DOCSLIB.ORG

Cliff Kincaid

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cliff Kincaid Daniel D. New The father of Army Specialist Michael G. New, Daniel is a Christian without apology, and a fifth generation Texan without apology. Until recent years, he was an American without apology, but out so-called "leaders" have become a world-wide embarrassment to any decent American traveling abroad. Daniel writes and lectures extensively on a wide variety of topics. He and his wife, Suzanne, have homeschooled their seven children (a medium-sized family) while living in Texas, Papua New Guinea, New Zealand and The Philippines. He is an ornamental horticulturist by training, an amature linguist, an avid gardener and poultryman by avocation, a patent-holding inventor, and an avid student of the "Literature of Freedom". The Michael New Action Fund is responsible for the legal defense for Michael New, as well as a world-wide public education effort to teach concerned citizens about what is happening to national sovereignty. They have one documentary video available, GOOD CONDUCT, The Story of Michael New. To contact Daniel or Michael New: Michael New Action Fund P.O. Box 100 Iredell, Texas 76649 Visit MNAF on-line at: http://www.mikenew.com/ E-mail Daniel at: [email protected] 2 Cliff Kincaid President of America's Survival Director, American Sovereignty Action Project A veteran journalist and commentator, Cliff Kincaid, 46, has been based in the Washington, D.C.-area for more than twenty years. He is the chief organizer of the Coalition for the American Sovereignty and Bill of Rights, which includes more than 50 organizations opposes the International Criminal Court. He lectures widely and serves as a consultant on international affairs. Cliff is the author or co-author of six books, including Michael New: Mercenary or American Soldier, which examines the case of the U.S. soldier court-martialed for refusing to wear a U.N. uniform; The United Nations' Global Welfare Giveaway, on the push for Third World "debt relief;" and The Playboy Foundation: A Mirror of the Culture? (Capital Research Center), on the harmful influence of Hugh Hefner, his magazine and corporation on American society and culture. In addition to writing the Washington Watch column for the American Legion Magazine, Cliff interviewed Senator Strom Thurmond and Rep. Christopher Cox for the publication. He previously served as an aide to Oliver North, former National Security Council staffer, at Freedom Alliance, a group based in Virginia. A recognized and respected figure in the conservative movement, Cliff has been a featured speaker at such events as the Conservative Political Action Conference, the Conservative Leadership Conference, and regular AIM conferences. A controversial and frequent guest on radio and television, Cliff was a guest co-host on CNN's Crossfire until he was banned from the program for talking tough to the Ambassador from Libya back in the 1980s. Kincaid challenged the ambassador to explain Libya's role in international terrorism. Kincaid's article in the Washington Post was just as controversial, challenging Rush Limbaugh's conservative credentials and authenticity. As president of America's Survival, a public policy organization, he directs a national educational campaign to expose threats to America's sovereignty and the liberties guaranteed by the Constitution. America's Survival has achieved national press attention for having pressed for the release of secret State Department documents in the Pan Am 103 terrorism case. Visit Cliff’s web site at: http://www.usasurvival.org Email Cliff at [email protected] 3 Contents Introduction Chapter 1: “ I Think I’m Going To Be Court-Martialed” Chapter 2: “Obey God, Serve Mankind, Oppose Tyranny” Chapter 3: “Resistance To Illegal Orders” Chapter 4: “Mercenary Army” Chapter 5: War Crimes: The International Criminal Court Chapter 6: “Impeachment” Appendices Oaths of Allegiance Letter To Chain of Command PDD 25 Homecoming Speech 4 Introduction On October 10, 1995, the 1/15 Battalion of the 3rd infantry Division of the U.S. Army came to attention at 0900 in Schweinfurt, Germany. All but one of the 550 soldiers were wearing a sky-blue baseball-style cap with a United Nations insignia on the front. One was wearing the olive-drab flat cap that is authorized to be worn with the Battle Dress Uniform. With this simple act of disobeying a direct order, Spc. 4 Michael New set the stage for a legal battle that has profound implications for the future of American soldiers into service of the United Nations without the constitutional permission of Congress. America stands at a crossroads in history. Will we face the future as an independent Republic? Or will our grandchildren grow up in a New World Order governed from New York City, where we as a Member State, can be consistently outvoted by a hundred other countries who do not share our hertitage, our values, and our interest? This legal case may well determine the future of our nation. Michael and Claudia New with Michael’s attorney retired Col. Henry Hamilton. 5 Chapter 1 “I Think I’m Going to be Court-Martialed.” August 21, 1995 The call was unexpected. Michael, calling from Germany, where he was stationed, had phoned us over the weekend, and we didn’t think he would be calling again on a Monday morning. “Dad,” he said, “I think I’m going to be court-martialed.” These words stuck into me like a knife. “What on earth have you done,” I asked. “I haven’t done anything,” he said. “It’s for something I’m not going to do. They’ve told me that I have to wear the United Nations uniform on our coming deployment into Macedonia, and I told them I have a problem with that order.” Later, he added, “You know, Dad, if they can force me to wear that blue helmet in Europe, then what’s to keep them from forcing me to wear it someday in Texas or some other state? The real question is one of authority -- where do they get it?” These statements put Michael right in the middle of a debate which continues over the meaning of his oath, which consists of the following: “I do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the uniform code of military justice. So help me God.”1 I’m often asked if we are bitter or angry over our son Michael being prosecuted for refusing to wear a United Nations uniform and refusing to report to a foreign military commander. Some people think we ought to be completely disgusted with a system that punished my son, a soldier with an excellent service record and a promising military career, for standing up for America, his oath, and against United Nations control of our troops. I wouldn’t be honest if I didn’t say that I’ve shaken my head in disbelief, even dismay, over how our nation has come to this point. But we hope and pray that the case of Army Specialist Michael New can help to turn our country around. It will take years, but I’m convinced that if the American people appreciate and understand this case, there will be a growing tide of opposition against the pretenders in power who are subverting our constitutional republic. My own father, Clyde New,2 used to emphasize that standing up for freedom is the responsibility of all citizens, and is not an action or an event – that it is instead a lifestyle – a commitment upon which our national freedom depends. If enough citizens just go along to get along, “go with the flow,” and take the easy road, then this Republic will die. These are not empty words. They are a recognition of what this case represents. All of our most cherished values -- freedom, family, service, sacrifice, sovereignty and independence - are wrapped up in this case. I recognize there are those who believe that it simply involves a case of a soldier who was punished for disobeying an order. But I challenge those holding this belief to take another look – to understand who Michael is, and who we are – his family, friends, allies and supporters. We are the American people. And we want our country back. There are those who expect that the treatment of Michael has shaken our faith in America and its institutions. But, because our faith is in a Supreme Creator, and because we understand the sinful nature of a fallen mankind, we are not surprised when men assume power and then quickly find themselves wallowing in the corruption which Lord Acton so accurately predicted. 1 “Your Oath. Defending the Constitution. Our Common Bond.” Deputy Chief of Staff for Personnel, The Pentagon, Washington, D.C. 20310. 2 Clyde Wayne New, USMC 1942-1945. American patriot. Eighty years old as this book is written. 6 The arrogance of this administration in turning over our sovereignty is not the only controversy that has drawn attention to the fact that corruption has infected our governmental institutions. It would take more than a chapter just to list them, and there are books upon books available on that subject. The Clinton-Gore Administration has raised arrogant lawlessness to an unprecedented level. What has happened to Michael New is part of a pattern. An Administration which orders a young soldier to report to the U.N. will sell our sovereignty to the United Nations and security to China.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • My Lai Massacre 1 My Lai Massacre
    My Lai Massacre 1 My Lai Massacre Coordinates: 15°10′42″N 108°52′10″E [1] My Lai Massacre Thảm sát Mỹ Lai Location Son My village, Son Tinh District of South Vietnam Date March 16, 1968 Target My Lai 4 and My Khe 4 hamlets Attack type Massacre Deaths 347 according to the U.S Army (not including My Khe killings), others estimate more than 400 killed and injuries are unknown, Vietnamese government lists 504 killed in total from both My Lai and My Khe Perpetrators Task force from the United States Army Americal Division 2LT. William Calley (convicted and then released by President Nixon to serve house arrest for two years) The My Lai Massacre (Vietnamese: thảm sát Mỹ Lai [tʰɐ̃ːm ʂɐ̌ːt mǐˀ lɐːj], [mǐˀlɐːj] ( listen); /ˌmiːˈlaɪ/, /ˌmiːˈleɪ/, or /ˌmaɪˈlaɪ/)[2] was the Vietnam War mass murder of between 347 and 504 unarmed civilians in South Vietnam on March 16, 1968, by United States Army soldiers of "Charlie" Company of 1st Battalion, 20th Infantry Regiment, 11th Brigade of the Americal Division. Victims included women, men, children, and infants. Some of the women were gang-raped and their bodies were later found to be mutilated[3] and many women were allegedly raped prior to the killings.[] While 26 U.S. soldiers were initially charged with criminal offenses for their actions at Mỹ Lai, only Second Lieutenant William Calley, a platoon leader in Charlie Company, was convicted. Found guilty of killing 22 villagers, he was originally given a life sentence, but only served three and a half years under house arrest.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politicization of University Schools of Education the Long March Through the Education Schools Jay Schalin
    The Politicization of University Schools of Education The Long March through the Education Schools Jay Schalin FEBRUARY 2019 The Politicization of University Schools of Education EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Few institutions receive more attention and more funding than our education system. And it certainly warrants that attention; after all, education plays a big part in determining the future. Reformers abound, for both higher education and the K-12 system. But they have largely missed one of the most crucial components of education, our schools of education, where future teachers are trained. They are out of sight and unapproachable for the K-12 reformers, and too technical and too much on the periphery for those who focus on higher education’s shortcomings. That has proven a grave error. Education schools are fundamental to all education. They are serving the nation badly, and it’s not just about test scores and graduation rates. Teacher education has become one of the most politicized corners of academia, an institution that is already out of step with the rest of the country politically. Education schools are leading the charge to “transform” the nation, and that transformation is not leading us to a better, freer, more prosperous, more humane society. This politicization of the education schools is not new, it is not invisible, and it is not occurring through random happenstance or by good ideas pushing out bad ones. It started over 100 years ago in the Progressive era, when the education schools first emerged as a body of experts who focused on “teaching” as a science; many of those experts were socialists who were open about their intentions to change the nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from Others for Future U.S. Army Operations in and Through the Information Environment CASE STUDIES
    C O R P O R A T I O N Lessons from Others for Future U.S. Army Operations in and Through the Information Environment CASE STUDIES Christopher Paul, Colin P. Clarke, Michael Schwille, Jakub P. Hlávka, Michael A. Brown, Steven S. Davenport, Isaac R. Porche III, Joel Harding For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR1925z2 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-0-8330-9997-6 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2018 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover photos (clockwise from top left): Giorgio Montersino via Flickr (CC BY-SA 2.0); U.S. Air Force photo by Airman 1st Class Adawn Kelsey; U.S. Air Force photo by Tech Sgt John Gordinier; U.S. Air National Guard photo by Master Sgt Andrew J. Moseley; Russian Ministry of Defence (CC BY 4.0); North Korean national media Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous.
    [Show full text]
  • THOMPSON, HUGH, 1943-2006. Hugh Thompson and Lawrence Colburn Collection, 1967-2006
    THOMPSON, HUGH, 1943-2006. Hugh Thompson and Lawrence Colburn collection, 1967-2006 Emory University Stuart A. Rose Manuscript, Archives, and Rare Book Library Atlanta, GA 30322 404-727-6887 [email protected] Descriptive Summary Creator: Thompson, Hugh, 1943-2006. Title: Hugh Thompson and Lawrence Colburn collection, 1967-2006 Call Number: Manuscript Collection No. 1056 Extent: 4 linear ft. (4 boxes) and AV Masters: .25 linear feet (1 box) Abstract: Materials relating to the life and careers of Hugh Thompson and Lawrence Colburn, United States Army soldiers during the Vietnam War, from 1967-2006. Language: Materials entirely in English. Administrative Information Restrictions on Access Special restrictions apply: Use copies have not been made for audiovisual material in this collection. Researchers must contact the Rose Library at least two weeks in advance for access to these items. Collection restrictions, copyright limitations, or technical complications may hinder the Rose Library's ability to provide access to audiovisual material. Terms Governing Use and Reproduction All requests subject to limitations noted in departmental policies on reproduction. Source Gift, 2006. Citation [after identification of item(s)], Hugh Thompson and Lawrence Colburn collection, Stuart A. Rose Manuscript, Archives, and Rare Book Library, Emory University. Processing Unprocessed collection. Emory Libraries provides copies of its finding aids for use only in research and private study. Copies supplied may not be copied for others or otherwise distributed without prior consent of the holding repository. Hugh Thompson and Lawrence Colburn collection, 1967-2006 Manuscript Collection No. 1056 This finding aid may include language that is offensive or harmful. Please refer to the Rose Library's harmful language statement for more information about why such language may appear and ongoing efforts to remediate racist, ableist, sexist, homophobic, euphemistic and other oppressive language.
    [Show full text]
  • Brookings/Pew Research Center Forum
    1 BROOKINGS/PEW RESEARCH CENTER FORUM THE BIENNIAL PEW MEDIA SURVEY: HOW NEWS HABITS CHANGED IN 2004 Tuesday, June 8, 2004 10:00 - 11:30 a.m. Washington, D.C. [TRANSCRIPT PRODUCED FROM A TAPE RECORDING] 2 C O N T E N T S Moderator: RON NESSEN Journalist in Residence, The Brookings Institution Presentation: ANDREW KOHUT Director, The Pew Research Center for the People and the Press Panelists: STEPHEN HESS Senior Fellow, Governance Studies, The Brookings Institution SUSAN PAGE Washington Bureau Chief, USA Today TOM ROSENSTIEL Director, Project for Excellence in Journalism 3 P R O C E E D I N G S MR. NESSEN: Good morning. Welcome to the Brookings Institution and welcome to this morning's forum, at which the Pew Research Center's biennial survey of the media habits of Americans is being released and discussed. This survey of 3,000 Americans was conducted between April 19th and May 12th. And we want to give a special welcome this morning to those who are watching the forum on C-SPAN. In case anyone here in the audience didn't get one, there are copies of the survey just outside--embargoed for 10 o'clock, and it is 10 o'clock, so the embargo has been lifted. For those of you who are watching at home, the results are available on the Pew Web site. You can link to it from the Brookings Web site. And also, by this afternoon, you'll find on the Brookings Web site a full transcript of this forum. Our format this morning will be, first of all, Andy Kohut, the director of the Pew Research Center for People and the Press, will announce and explain the findings of the survey.
    [Show full text]
  • June 2015 Honoring M
    The Schwarz Report Dr. Fred Schwarz Volume 55, Number 6 Dr. David Noebel June 2015 Honoring M. Stanton Evans by Cliff Kincaid Those who assembled on March 12 at St. John the Apostle Catholic Church in Leesburg, Virginia, to celebrate the life of conservative thinker and writer M. Stanton Evans heard several references to his monumental 1994 work, The Theme is Freedom. This book is worth remembering and re-reading as we are being treated repeatedly to the spectacle in the media of “conservatives” endorsing gay rights and gay marriage. In an illustration of what Stan called the “pagan ethic,” he cites on page 128 “the campaign to change societal views of homosexuality—to treat it as an ‘alternative lifestyle,’ as valid in its way as heterosexual conduct.” Stan comments, “Among other things, this is a reversion to pagan ways of thinking.” He cites acceptance of homosexuality in ancient civilizations such as Babylon and notes, “All of this was unequivocally condemned by the religion of the Bible.” Yet, as Austin Ruse points out in his Breitbart article, “GOP Elite Ask Supreme Court to Impose Gay Marriage on America,” a brief to celebrate homosexual “marriage” as equal to traditional marriage has been submitted to the court and signed by 300 conservatives and/or Republicans, including no less than 26 former senior Mitt Romney staffers. These so-called “conservatives,” who are not conservative in any real sense, are part of a “Project Right Side” that is designed to confuse the public about the meaning of the term. The “media” section of the website tells us how news organizations have covered the “conservative case for gay marriage.” But there is nothing “conservative” about asking the Supreme Court to impose homosexual marriage on all 50 states.
    [Show full text]
  • Groups Top 1000
    SPECIAL ISSUE IntelligencepubliShed by Spring 2011 | iSSue 141 The SouThern poverTy law CenTerReport THE YEAR IN HATE & EXTREMISM HATE GROUPS TOP 1000 Led by antigovernment ‘Patriot’ groups, the radical right expands dramatically for the second year in a row EDITORIAL The Arizonification of America By Mark Potok, Editor when even leading conser- As we explain in this issue, this dramatic growth of the rad- vatives worry out loud about the ical right for the second consecutive year is related to anger right-wing vitriol and demoniz- over the changing racial make-up of the country, the ailing ing propaganda so commonplace in economy and the spreading of demonizing propaganda and contemporary America, you’ve got other kinds of hate speech in the political mainstream. to be concerned about where our The white-hot political atmosphere is not limited to hard- country is headed. line nativist politicians, conspiracy-mongering cable news This January, former President hosts, or even openly radical hate groups. During the same George W. Bush, speaking in a month when most of these conservative commentaries were question-and-answer session written, the nation witnessed an extraordinary series of at Texas’ Southern Methodist events that highlighted the atmosphere of political extremism. University, warned that the nation seemed to be reliving its On Jan. 8, a Tucson man opened fire in a parking lot on worst anti-immigrant moments. “My point is, we’ve been U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, Democrat of Arizona, killing six through this kind of period of isolationism, protectionism, people, critically wounding the congresswoman and badly nativism” before, he said.
    [Show full text]
  • “You Probably Don't Know Who Or What You Are Talking About”: Cultural and Moral
    Brown et al. Justice Policy Journal, Spring 2015 “You probably don't know who or what you are talking about”: Cultural and Moral Incompetence in Evaluating the Veteran in the Criminal Justice System William Brown1, Robert Stanulis2, Misty Weitzel3 and Kyle Rodgers4 Justice Policy Journal Volume 12, Number 1 (Spring) © Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice 2015 www.cjcj.org/jpj Abstract The topic veterans entangled in criminal justice is not novel. Veterans have often been used to occupy jail cells and fill empty prison beds since at least the end of the Civil War. Massive numbers of World War I veterans made the transition from war to prison. While there are no specific data regarding World War II veterans and criminal justice encounters, the Vietnam War produced many veterans who landed in prison. Today many Iraq and Afghanistan veterans are beginning the long process from war to jail and prison. Historically, the criminal justice system, along with much of the general public, has ignored the intricate details of military culture and the impact that culture plays on veterans trying to find their place in the civilian culture. The primary purpose of this article is to awaken and educate those in the criminal justice system about the importance of cultural competency when it comes to processing veterans through the criminal justice system. We also introduce the 1 Department of Criminal Justice, Western Oregon University 2 Clinical Psychologist, Veterans Advisory Board, Western Oregon University 3 Department of Criminal Justice, Western Oregon University 4 Department of Criminal Justice, Western Oregon University Corresponding Author: William Brown Email: [email protected] or [email protected] Phone: 503-269-6065 “You probably don’t know who or what you are talking about” 1 importance of employing a multidisciplinary approach to enable a comprehensive understanding of the plight of veterans as they attempt to re-acculturate back into civilian communities.
    [Show full text]
  • NPRC) VIP List, 2009
    Description of document: National Archives National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) VIP list, 2009 Requested date: December 2007 Released date: March 2008 Posted date: 04-January-2010 Source of document: National Personnel Records Center Military Personnel Records 9700 Page Avenue St. Louis, MO 63132-5100 Note: NPRC staff has compiled a list of prominent persons whose military records files they hold. They call this their VIP Listing. You can ask for a copy of any of these files simply by submitting a Freedom of Information Act request to the address above. The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Networks for Hate Speech Commercial Talk Radio and New Media
    CSRC WORKING PAPER JULY 2012 AN OCCASIONAL SERIES AVAILABLE IN ELECTRONIC FORMAT SOCIAL NETWORKS FOR HATE SPEECH COMMERCIAL TALK RADIO AND NEW MEDIA CHON A. NORIEGA AND FRANCISCO JAVIER IRIBARREN WITH ROSS LENIHAN, ANDREW YOUNG, AND HÉCTOR PEÑA RAMÍREZ FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT: UCLA Chicano Studies Research Center • 193 Haines Hall • Los Angeles, CA 90095-1544 Phone: 310-825-2642 • Fax: 310-206-1784 • E-Mail: [email protected] The center’s books and journals are sold at www.store.chicano.ucla.edu Editor: Chon A. Noriega • Senior Editor: Rebecca Frazier • Developmental Editor: Rebecca Epstein • Production: William Morosi MISSION STATEMENT The UCLA Chicano Studies Research Center supports interdisciplinary, collaborative, and policy-oriented research on issues critical to the Chicano community. The center’s press disseminates books, working papers, and the peer-reviewed Aztlán: A Journal of Chicano Studies. CSRC WORKING PAPER JULY 2012 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION The impact of Geller’s and other U.S. blogs with an anti-Islam message came under question following This study analyzes how social networks that Today’s new media provide opportunities for individuals and organizations to share and spread infor- the attacks by Anders Behring Breivik, who killed form around the hosts of commercial talk radio mation more quickly and more democratically than seventy-seven people in Norway in July 2011. The New York Times reported that Breivik had been shows can propagate messages targeting vulner- ever before. Data gathered for the Pew Internet and American Life Project show that 77 percent of adults “deeply influenced” by several blogs, including Jihad able groups.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 Annual Report Celebrating Our 40Th Year As America’S Original Media Watchdog
    2009 Annual Report Celebrating our 40th year as America’s original media watchdog A Message from the Chairman Accomplishments in 2009 • Through the American Journalism Center (AJC), our internship program, AIM provided 16 aspiring conservative journalists with the training they will need to compete in the media marketplace. • AIM honored independent journalists with our annual Reed Irvine Accuracy in Media Awards. M. Stanton Evans received the award for Investigative Journalism, and Karl Denninger received the award for Grassroots Journalism. • Our new book, Voodoo Anyone? How to Understand Economics Without Really Trying, makes basic free-market economic principles accessible to reporters. With our sister organization, AIM Chairman Don Irvine, right, with U.S. Congressman Lamar Smith Accuracy in Academia, we are working to provide (R-Texas) at Accuracy in Media’s 40th anniversary conference copies to journalism schools to be used as a textbook. In 2009, Accuracy in Media commemorated its 40th • We published I Can’t Believe You Said That! anniversary. We’ve come a long way since my father, Hundreds of Liberals Speak Their Minds, a book Reed Irvine, founded the organization in 1969. that highlights a media double standard that lets liberals regularly get a free pass from the press for We celebrated this milestone with an all-day outrageous comments. conference in Washington, DC. Rep. Lamar Smith, Tony Blankley, Andrew C. McCarthy, Jonah Goldberg, Lord • AIM sponsored the first-ever Conservative Christopher Monckton, John Fund and Trevor Loudon Leadership Summit to Confront Media Bias on were among the speakers. C-SPAN aired the full May 8, 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • CSMUN-HISTORICAL-CRISIS-WAR-CRIMES.-MY-LAI.Pdf
    Campion School MUN 2018 HISTORICAL CRISIS WAR CRIMES OF MY LAI MASSACRE President: Antonia Dalla Deputy-President: Roy Malta Deputy-President: Phoevos Goudas International Memorable Challenges Community Experience Skills Historical Crisis: My Lai Massacre Campion School MUN 2018 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................................ 3 DEFINITIONS OF KEY TERMS ......................................................................................................................................... 4 TIMELINE ........................................................................................................................................................................... 5 INTRODUCTION OF TOPIC .............................................................................................................................................. 8 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND .......................................................................................................................................... 9 POSSIBLE VERDICTS .................................................................................................................................................... 10 MAJOR PARTIES INVOLVED......................................................................................................................................... 13 TOPIC DISCUSSION ......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]