Kenya Kakamega Phase 1 Results Brief Draft 3

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

PERFORMANCE MONITORING FOR ACTION PLANNING FAMILY PMA KENya (Kakamega) Results from Phase 1 baseline survey November–December 2019 overall key findings There has been 49% of the women reported to 45% of the 77% of the users consistent decrease in have received comprehensive pregnancies obtained their current modern contraception methods information during were modern method from a use since 2016 for all the FP visit. unintended. women. public health facility SECTION 1: CONTRACEPTIVE USE, DYNAMICS, AND DEMAND MODERN CONTRACEPTIVE PREVALENCE CONTRACEPTIVE PREVALENCE by Percent of women age 15-49 currently using modern contraception (mCPR) by method type marital status Percent of women age 15-49 currently using contraception by method type (PMA Phase 1 n=723) 100 100 90 90 80 80 74 70 70 68 66 70 60 57 62 60 49 50 53 50 51 47 40 45 40 36 29 28 30 30 26 25 20 20 24 23 23 22 10 10 1 1 1 2 0 0 Dec Dec Dec Dec Dec Dec Dec Dec 2016 2018 2019 2017 2016 2017 2018 2019 PMA2020 survey rounds PMA PMA2020 survey rounds PMA Phase Married women (PMA Phase 1 n=457) Short-acting methods Phase 1 Unmarried, sexually active women (PMA Phase 1 n=44) Long-acting methods 1 All women (PMA Phase 1 n=723) Traditional methods modern contraceptive Method Use, Unmet Need, and Demand prevalence by county Satisfied by a Modern Method Percent of women age 15-49 currently using modern contraception by Percent of women age 15-49 using contraception by method type, unmet need, Kenya county and demand satisfied by a modern method (PMA Phase 1 n=723) 100 Bungoma 50 90 83 81 79 80 Nyamira 49 80 Nandi 49 70 60 4 5 6 7 4 Kakamega 47 7 6 1 1 5 50 1 2 Nairobi 47 40 30 Kiambu 53 51 47 49 20 47 43 Kericho 10 Kitui 41 0 Dec Dec Dec Dec 2016 2017 2018 2019 Siaya 41 PMA2020 survey rounds PMA Phase Kilifi 35 1 Modern method Unmet need for limiting West Pokot 19 Traditional method Demand satisfied by modern method Unmet need for spacing 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Demand satisfied by a modern method is use of modern contraceptive methods divided by the sum of unmet need plus total contraceptive use. TRENDS IN MODERN CONTRACEPTIVE MIX modern contraceptive method Percent distribution of modern contraceptive users age 15-49 by method and year (PMA Phase 1 n=340) mix Percent distribution of modern contraceptive users age 15-49 by method 1 2 6 36 41 6 45 46 30 Key for method mix charts: 30 3 Other modern methods 3 Emergency contraception 15 Male condom 33 Pill 30 28 39 Injectable (SC) Injectable (IM) 46 9 43 Implant 5 6 9 IUD 8 5 6 5 5 Female sterilization 6 5 4 5 ‘Other’ category includes 6 3 2 male sterilization, female 2 3 2 6 4 1 1 2 1 3 condoms, diaphragm, LAM, Dec Dec Dec Dec and standard days/cycle Married/in union Unmarried, beads. 2016 2017 2018 2019 women (n=280) sexually active PMA2020 survey rounds PMA women (n=30) Phase 1 Page 2 12-MONTH DISCONTINUATION RATE Among women who started an episode of contraceptive use within the two years preceding the survey, the percent of episodes discontinued within 12 months (n=378 episodes) 6% Reasons for discontinuation: Discontinued but discontinued to switched methods: become pregnant 3% 10% 12% experienced were concerned over had other fertility 22% 48% method failure side effects or health related reasons Switched discontinued for other reasons 4% 15% 4% other method- wanted a more other/don’t know related reasons effective method KEY FINDINGS for section 1: contraceptive use, Intention of Most Recent DYNAMICS, AND DEMAND Birth/Current Pregnancy Percent of women by intention of their most recent birth or • Implants is the most dominant method of current pregnancy (n=406) contraception among all, married and unmarried sexually 15%wanted no more children active women. • 54% of the time, methods were discontinued within one year of starting. 6% did so to become pregnant and 22% 30%wanted later switched to another method. • 45% of the pregnancies were unitended with 305 been mistimed and 15% not wanted at all 45% 55% of pregnancies were Intended unintended SECTION 2: QUALITY OF FP SERVICES AND COUNSELING Method information index plus (miI+) Percent of women who were told about side effects, what to do about side effects, of other methods, and the possibility of switching methods (n=336) When you obtained your method were Percent of women who responded “Yes” you told by the provider about side effects 34 66 to all four MII+ questions or problems you might have? Were you told what to do if you experienced side effects or problems? 9 92 Were you told by the provider about methods of FP other than the method you 28 72 received? 51% 49% Were you told that you could switch to a answered “No” answered “Yes” different method in the future? 25 75 to at least one to all four MII+ MII+ question questions No Yes Page 3 Discussed FP in the past year client exit interviews with provider/CHW Percent of female clients age 15-49 who said yes to the following questions (n=449) Percent of women who received FP information from a provider or community health worker (CHW), by age During today’s visit, did the provider tell 48% you the advantages/disadvantages of the 52% FP method? 1% 7% During today’s visit, did you obtain the method of FP you wanted? 92% 3% 40 29 Were you satisfied with FP services you 15 received today at this facility? 97% 15-19 20-24 25-49 (n=158) (n=128) (n=437) Yes No Neither (follow-up visit) Yes No Clients were interviewed immediately following their health facility visit to obtain FP counseling or services. KEY FINDINGS for section 2: QUALITY OF FP SERVICES AND COUNSELING • 97% of the clients reported satisfaction with FP services they received, however 48% reported that the provider did not discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the chosen method. • Adolescent girls are least likely to have discussed FP with their health provider or CHW in the past year. SECTION 3: PARTNER DYNAMICS partner involvement in FP Percent of women who are Percent of women who are not currently using FP and agree with currently using FP and agree with decisions the following statements (n=350) the following statements (n=331) Percent of women who are currently using modern, female controlled methods and agree with the following statements (n=336) Would you say Would you say that using FP is that not using Does your partner Before you started using this mainly your FP is mainly know that you are method had you discussed decision? your decision? using this method? the decision to delay or avoid pregnancy with your partner? 11% 49% 4% 15% 20% 29% 5% 40% 76% Yes <1% Joint decision 81% No 72% Mainly respondent Modern, female controlled methods Includes all modern methods except male Mainly partner sterilization and male condoms Other KEY FINDINGS for section 3: partner dynamics • Among women using a modern method that can be concealed, 20% report that their partner does not know that they are using contraception. • 11% of women who are using contraceptive method report that it is mainly their partner’s decision. • 15% of the decisions not to use and 49% of the decisions to use FP are jointly made. Page 4 SECTION 4: WOMEN AND GIRLS’ EMPOWERMENT agreement with family planning empowerment statements Percent of all women who strongly agree to strongly disagree with each statement Exercise of choice (self-efficacy, negotiation) for family planning (n=720) I feel confident telling my provider what is important when selecting an FP method. 10 4 2 15 69 I can decide to switch from one FP method to another if I want to. 12 4 2 14 68 Existence of choice (motivational autonomy) for family planning (n=713) If I use FP, my body may experience side effects that will disrupt relations with my partner. 52 11 4 14 20 If I use FP, my children may not be born normal. 72 9 2 7 9 There will be conflict in my relationship/marriage if I use FP. 64 14 3 7 13 If I use FP, I may have trouble getting pregnant the next time I want to. 62 12 3 8 15 If I use FP, my partner may seek another sexual partner. 69 14 2 6 9 Strongly disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree Women's and Girls' Empowerment (WGE) Sub-Scale for Family Planning The Women's and Girls' Empowerment (WGE) Index examines existence of Mean WGE score, by education Mean WGE score, by age choice, exercise of choice, and achievement of choice domains across pregnancy, family planning, and sex Overall 4.1 Overall 4.1 outcomes. Presented results are only for the Tertiary 4.4 existence of choice and exercise of choice education 25-49 4.2 domains for family planning. Scores from the above family planning Secondary 4.2 20-24 4.0 empowerment statements were summed education and divided by number of items (7) for average WGE family planning score across both domains . None/ Primary 4.0 15-19 3.9 education Range for the combined WGE family planning score is 1-5, with a score of 5 21 3 54 21 3 54 indicating highest empowerment. Page 5 mCPR and intent to use contraception, mCPR and intent to use KEY FINDINGS for by categorical WGE score contraception, by employment section 4: Percent of women using a modern method of contraception Percent of women using a modern method of Women and girls’ and percent of women who intend to use contraception in contraception and percent of women who the next year by categorical WGE score (n=723) intend to use contraception in the next year by empowerment employment status (n=723) • Women who score 100 100 higher on the empowerment scale 80 80 are much more likely to be using a modern 12 60 60 11 contraceptive method 12 7 12 or intend to use in 40 15 40 Intent to use contraception the future.
Recommended publications
  • County Urban Governance Tools

    County Urban Governance Tools

    County Urban Governance Tools This map shows various governance and management approaches counties are using in urban areas Mandera P Turkana Marsabit P West Pokot Wajir ish Elgeyo Samburu Marakwet Busia Trans Nzoia P P Isiolo P tax Bungoma LUFs P Busia Kakamega Baringo Kakamega Uasin P Gishu LUFs Nandi Laikipia Siaya tax P P P Vihiga Meru P Kisumu ga P Nakuru P LUFs LUFs Nyandarua Tharaka Garissa Kericho LUFs Nithi LUFs Nyeri Kirinyaga LUFs Homa Bay Nyamira P Kisii P Muranga Bomet Embu Migori LUFs P Kiambu Nairobi P Narok LUFs P LUFs Kitui Machakos Kisii Tana River Nyamira Makueni Lamu Nairobi P LUFs tax P Kajiado KEY County Budget and Economic Forums (CBEFs) They are meant to serve as the primary institution for ensuring public participation in public finances in order to im- Mom- prove accountability and public participation at the county level. basa Baringo County, Bomet County, Bungoma County, Busia County,Embu County, Elgeyo/ Marakwet County, Homabay County, Kajiado County, Kakamega County, Kericho Count, Kiambu County, Kilifi County, Kirin- yaga County, Kisii County, Kisumu County, Kitui County, Kwale County, Laikipia County, Machakos Coun- LUFs ty, Makueni County, Meru County, Mombasa County, Murang’a County, Nairobi County, Nakuru County, Kilifi Nandi County, Nyandarua County, Nyeri County, Samburu County, Siaya County, TaitaTaveta County, Taita Taveta TharakaNithi County, Trans Nzoia County, Uasin Gishu County Youth Empowerment Programs in urban areas In collaboration with the national government, county governments unveiled
  • Kakamega National Reserve Is Accessible by All Vehicles All Year Round

    Kakamega National Reserve Is Accessible by All Vehicles All Year Round

    CAMPING For the more adventurous visitors, camping can never be wilder here. With guaranteed round the clock security, every second would be worth your money. Visitors can camp at the nearby Udo campsite. A number of campsites are located in the park. Please contact the warden or call KWS HQfor more information WHEN TO GO Kakamega National Reserve is accessible by all vehicles all year round. However to enjoy the beauty of the park visitors are advised to walk through the forest. WHAT TO TAKE WITH YOU Drinking water, picnic items and camping gear if you intend to stay overnight. Also useful are binoculars, camera, hat, and hiking boots. Visitors should be prepared for wet weather and wear footwear adequate for muddy and uneven trails. PLEASE RESPECT THE WILDLIFE CODE Respect the privacy of the wildlife, this is their habitat. Beware ofthe animals, they are wild and can be unpredictable. Don't crowd the animals or make sudden noises or movements. Don't feed the animals, it upsets their diet and leads to human dependence. Keep quiet, noise disturbs the wildlife and may antagonize your fellow visitors. Never drive off-road, this severely damages the habitat. When viewing wildlife keep to a minimum distance of 20 meters and pull to the side of the road so as to allow others to pass. KENYA WILDLIFE SERVICE PARKS AND RESERVES Leave no litter and never leave fires unattended or discard burning objects. • ABERDARE NATIONAL PARK. AMBOSELI NATIONAL PARK. ARABUKO SOKOKE NATIONAL RESERVE. Respect the cultural heritage of Kenya, nevertake pictures of the local people or • CENTRAL & SOUTHERN ISLAND NATIONAL PARK.
  • The Evolution of Mumias Settlement Into an Urban Centre to Circa 1940 Godwin Rapando Murunga

    The Evolution of Mumias Settlement Into an Urban Centre to Circa 1940 Godwin Rapando Murunga

    The evolution of Mumias settlement into an urban centre to circa 1940 Godwin Rapando Murunga To cite this version: Godwin Rapando Murunga. The evolution of Mumias settlement into an urban centre to circa 1940. Geography. 1998. dumas-01302363 HAL Id: dumas-01302363 https://dumas.ccsd.cnrs.fr/dumas-01302363 Submitted on 14 Apr 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. THE EVOLUTION OF MUMIAS SETTLEMENT INTO AN URBAN CENTRE TO CIRCA 1940 BY GODWIN RAPANDO MURUNGA A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE MASTER OF ARTS DEGREE AT KENYATTA UNIVERSITY IFRA 111111111111111111111111111111111111 1 IFRA001481 No. d'inventaire Date te0 Cote August 1998 .1 •MS,Har,f..42G. , , (1. R Y 001 l°\1)..j9". E DECLARATION This thesis is my original work, and to the best of my knowlehe, has not been submitted for a degree in any university. GODWIN RAPANDO MURUNGA This thesis has been submitted with my approval as a University supervisor. .4010 PROF.ERIC MASINDE ASEKA iii DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to my wife Carolyne Temoi Rapando and to my sons Tony Wangatia Rapando and Claude Manya Rapando for their patience and constant understanding during the long years of working.
  • Check-List of the Butterflies of the Kakamega Forest Nature Reserve in Western Kenya (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea)

    Check-List of the Butterflies of the Kakamega Forest Nature Reserve in Western Kenya (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea)

    Nachr. entomol. Ver. Apollo, N. F. 25 (4): 161–174 (2004) 161 Check-list of the butterflies of the Kakamega Forest Nature Reserve in western Kenya (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea) Lars Kühne, Steve C. Collins and Wanja Kinuthia1 Lars Kühne, Museum für Naturkunde der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Invalidenstraße 43, D-10115 Berlin, Germany; email: [email protected] Steve C. Collins, African Butterfly Research Institute, P.O. Box 14308, Nairobi, Kenya Dr. Wanja Kinuthia, Department of Invertebrate Zoology, National Museums of Kenya, P.O. Box 40658, Nairobi, Kenya Abstract: All species of butterflies recorded from the Kaka- list it was clear that thorough investigation of scientific mega Forest N.R. in western Kenya are listed for the first collections can produce a very sound list of the occur- time. The check-list is based mainly on the collection of ring species in a relatively short time. The information A.B.R.I. (African Butterfly Research Institute, Nairobi). Furthermore records from the collection of the National density is frequently underestimated and collection data Museum of Kenya (Nairobi), the BIOTA-project and from offers a description of species diversity within a local literature were included in this list. In total 491 species or area, in particular with reference to rapid measurement 55 % of approximately 900 Kenyan species could be veri- of biodiversity (Trueman & Cranston 1997, Danks 1998, fied for the area. 31 species were not recorded before from Trojan 2000). Kenyan territory, 9 of them were described as new since the appearance of the book by Larsen (1996). The kind of list being produced here represents an information source for the total species diversity of the Checkliste der Tagfalter des Kakamega-Waldschutzge- Kakamega forest.
  • KENYA POPULATION SITUATION ANALYSIS Kenya Population Situation Analysis

    KENYA POPULATION SITUATION ANALYSIS Kenya Population Situation Analysis

    REPUBLIC OF KENYA KENYA POPULATION SITUATION ANALYSIS Kenya Population Situation Analysis Published by the Government of Kenya supported by United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) Kenya Country Oce National Council for Population and Development (NCPD) P.O. Box 48994 – 00100, Nairobi, Kenya Tel: +254-20-271-1600/01 Fax: +254-20-271-6058 Email: [email protected] Website: www.ncpd-ke.org United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) Kenya Country Oce P.O. Box 30218 – 00100, Nairobi, Kenya Tel: +254-20-76244023/01/04 Fax: +254-20-7624422 Website: http://kenya.unfpa.org © NCPD July 2013 The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the contributors. Any part of this document may be freely reviewed, quoted, reproduced or translated in full or in part, provided the source is acknowledged. It may not be sold or used inconjunction with commercial purposes or for prot. KENYA POPULATION SITUATION ANALYSIS JULY 2013 KENYA POPULATION SITUATION ANALYSIS i ii KENYA POPULATION SITUATION ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................iv FOREWORD ..........................................................................................................................................ix ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ..........................................................................................................................x EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................xi
  • Usg Humanitarian Assistance to Kenya

    Usg Humanitarian Assistance to Kenya

    USG HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE TO KENYA 35° 36° 37° 38° 39° 40°Original Map Courtesy 41° of the UN Cartographic Section 42° SUDAN The boundaries and names used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance Todenyang COUNTRYWIDE by the U.S. Government. Banya ETHIOPIA Lokichokio KRCS Sabarei a UNICEF 4° F 4° RIFT VALLEY Banissa WFP Ramu Mandera ACTED Kakuma ACRJ Lokwa UNHCR Kangole p ManderaMandera Concern CF Moyale Takaba IFRC North Horr Lodwar IMC F MoyaleMoyale 3° El NORTHWak EASTERN 3° Merlin F Loiyangalani FH FilmAid TurkanaTurkana Buna AC IRC MarsabitMarsabit Mercy USA F J j D Lokichar JRS k WASDA J j Marsabit WajirWajir Tarbaj CARE LWR ikp EASTERNEASTERN Vj J 2° Girito Salesian Missions Lokori Center for 2° S Victims of Torture k Baragoi EASTERN World University Laisamis Wajir of Canada V FH FilmAid WestWest AC PokotPokot NORTHNORTH Handicap Int. RIFTR I F T VALLEYVA L L E Y SamburuSamburu EASTERNEASTERN IRC UGANDA Tot j D Maralal TransTrans NzoiaNzoia MarakwetMarakwet Archer's LWR 1° MtMt Kitale BaringoBaringo Dif ikp 1° Kisima Post Habaswein ElgonElgon NRC LugariLugari Lorule S I WESTERNWESTERN UasinUasin SC BungomaBungoma GishuGishu Mado Gashi G TesoTeso Marigat IsioloIsiolo Busia Webuye Eldoret KeiyoKeiyo Isiolo World UniversityLiboi KakamegaKakamega Lare Kinna of Canada V Burnt Nyahururu LaikipiaLaikipia BusiaBusia Kakamega Forest Butere NandiNandi KoibatekKoibatek (Thomson's Falls) MeruMeru NorthNorth Nanyuki Dadaab SiayaSiaya VihigaVihiga Subukia Mogotio Meru 0° Kipkelion MeruMeru 0° Londiani a KisumuKisumu
  • County Name County Code Location

    County Name County Code Location

    COUNTY NAME COUNTY CODE LOCATION MOMBASA COUNTY 001 BANDARI COLLEGE KWALE COUNTY 002 KENYA SCHOOL OF GOVERNMENT MATUGA KILIFI COUNTY 003 PWANI UNIVERSITY TANA RIVER COUNTY 004 MAU MAU MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL LAMU COUNTY 005 LAMU FORT HALL TAITA TAVETA 006 TAITA ACADEMY GARISSA COUNTY 007 KENYA NATIONAL LIBRARY WAJIR COUNTY 008 RED CROSS HALL MANDERA COUNTY 009 MANDERA ARIDLANDS MARSABIT COUNTY 010 ST. STEPHENS TRAINING CENTRE ISIOLO COUNTY 011 CATHOLIC MISSION HALL, ISIOLO MERU COUNTY 012 MERU SCHOOL THARAKA-NITHI 013 CHIAKARIGA GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL EMBU COUNTY 014 KANGARU GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL KITUI COUNTY 015 MULTIPURPOSE HALL KITUI MACHAKOS COUNTY 016 MACHAKOS TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE MAKUENI COUNTY 017 WOTE TECHNICAL TRAINING INSTITUTE NYANDARUA COUNTY 018 ACK CHURCH HALL, OL KALAU TOWN NYERI COUNTY 019 NYERI PRIMARY SCHOOL KIRINYAGA COUNTY 020 ST.MICHAEL GIRLS BOARDING MURANGA COUNTY 021 MURANG'A UNIVERSITY COLLEGE KIAMBU COUNTY 022 KIAMBU INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY TURKANA COUNTY 023 LODWAR YOUTH POLYTECHNIC WEST POKOT COUNTY 024 MTELO HALL KAPENGURIA SAMBURU COUNTY 025 ALLAMANO HALL PASTORAL CENTRE, MARALAL TRANSZOIA COUNTY 026 KITALE MUSEUM UASIN GISHU 027 ELDORET POLYTECHNIC ELGEYO MARAKWET 028 IEBC CONSTITUENCY OFFICE - ITEN NANDI COUNTY 029 KAPSABET BOYS HIGH SCHOOL BARINGO COUNTY 030 KENYA SCHOOL OF GOVERNMENT, KABARNET LAIKIPIA COUNTY 031 NANYUKI HIGH SCHOOL NAKURU COUNTY 032 NAKURU HIGH SCHOOL NAROK COUNTY 033 MAASAI MARA UNIVERSITY KAJIADO COUNTY 034 MASAI TECHNICAL TRAINING INSTITUTE KERICHO COUNTY 035 KERICHO TEA SEC. SCHOOL
  • Kenya IDP Transit Sites, Rift Valley Province Molo, Uasin Gishu, Kwanza, Trans Nzoia West & Koibatek Districts

    Kenya IDP Transit Sites, Rift Valley Province Molo, Uasin Gishu, Kwanza, Trans Nzoia West & Koibatek Districts

    UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, Kenya Kenya IDP Transit Sites, Rift Valley Province Molo, Uasin Gishu, Kwanza, Trans Nzoia West & Koibatek Districts Go-down: West Pokot Distrib.P.* SalamNa N Kenya Provinces GSUNKimondo N N Matumbee NNChepkoilel TobooN Gathata Geta Farm Kalaha N N Patwaka Trans Marakwet EASTERN N Nasianda Nzoia N Gatina Village RIFT VALLEY NORTH EASTERN N Gitwamba WESTERN N Kokwet N CENTRAL Mt. NYANZA Elgon NAIROBI Sirikwa N Moiben- Mafuta COAST N Moiben BenmNoi Farm !(Kimilili Ziwa Rayfarm machine Moiben Bungoma N N Baringo WESTERN Soy Soy TransitN!( Turbo Uasin !( Gishu Gilgil- Maili Tarigo Chepkanga Nne/Kambi N transit Thomas N N Kimumu Huruma N Transit N !(Eldoret Yamumbi Kipkaren Kabarnet N Keiyo !( Mkt RIFT !( Ndeffo N!(Marigat KasarinaN VALLEY Losuru Jasho & Kiamba MalelN NNOutspan Kaptagat Geticha Kihingo Lugaria !( N N Kabiyet Transit Kamwaura N !(Mkt Nyakinyua N Matunda Langwenda N N Beestone Grassland N Njokerio N N Kipkabus/waunifor N Kuresoi Sasumua Baringo BN Kio Farm Centre N Bindura N N Sosiot Usalama !(Kakamega Kimkaza Farm N N N (&Nyakinyua) Kakamega Rurigi N N Geti Cheptiret BF Town !( N NFarm Kamuyu Center Lessos BurnNt Ngarua Kapsabet !( Farm !( !( N FoNrNest Farm N N Nandi KondoN-N Kondo- 7 Farm Center NSDA N N & Bisaria Kio Farm BaptisNtNNPAG N Charismata Chavakali Kuresoi CeNnatnredi Molo !( Hills Baraka Police Rongai Koibatek !( N N Kapdening N Kahuho N Mbale Vihiga Matharu NVillage N !( Center !(Timboroa Eldama Majengo Usalama (&Nyakinyua) ravine !( Rurigi N NKangema BodeniN!(
  • Change-Detection in Western Kenya

    Change-Detection in Western Kenya

    CHANGE-DETECTION IN WESTERN KENYA – THE DOCUMENTATION OF FRAGMENTATION AND DISTURBANCE FOR KAKAMEGA FOREST AND ASSOCIATED FOREST AREAS BY MEANS OF REMOTELY-SENSED IMAGERY T. Lung, G. Schaab * Department of Geoinformation, Karlsruhe University of Applied Sciences, Moltkestr. 30, D-76133 Karlsruhe, Germany, [email protected] KEY WORDS: Remote Sensing, Multisensor Imagery, Landsat, Classification, Land Cover, Change-Detection, GIS ABSTRACT: In order to understand causes and effects of disturbance and fragmentation on flora and fauna, a time series on land cover change is needed as basis for the BIOTA-East Africa project partners working in western Kenya. For 7 time steps over the past 30 years Land- sat data were collected for Kakamega Forest and its associated forest areas. Preprocessing involved georeferencing and radiometric corrections. In a first step the time series is evaluated via a threshold analysis distinguishing between “forest” and “non-forest”. Even though a temporally changing pattern of forest losses and replanting is observed, in total no major change in forest-covered area is revealed. Therefore, a supervised multispectral classification is performed distinguishing between classes at the ecosystem level. Ground truthing for the historical imagery is done with the help of maps showing vegetation types or land cover. Actual land cover verification is based on amateur photographs taken from an aeroplane as well as on terrain references. For classification the maxi- mum-likelihood decision rule is applied considering bands 3, 4, 5, 7 plus 7/2 for TM/ETM+ imagery and 1, 2, 3 and 4 for MSS-data, repectively. If available, scenes from both the rainy and dry seasons are made use of.
  • Know Your Tribunals

    Know Your Tribunals

    Know your Tribunals KNOKNOWW YYOUROUR TRIBUNALSTRIBUNALS Article 1(3) (c) of the Constitution recognizes the Judiciary and independent tribunals as State organs to which sovereign power is delegated by the people of Kenya. According Article 159 (1) of the Constitution, judicial authority vests in and is to be excised by courts and tribunals established by or under the Constitution. Article 169 (1) further defines subordinate courts under the Judiciary to include local tribunals as may be established by an Act of Parliament. Out of the over 50 tribunals in Kenya, 20 have been transited to the Judiciary in compliance with the Constitution. Below are the 20 tribunals under the Judiciary and their respective jurisdictions. Tribunals are now coordinated through the office of Registrar Tribunals established by the Judicial Service Commission. BUSINESS PREMISES RENT TRIBUNAL COMPETITION TRIBUNAL Establishment Establishment Business Premises Rent Tribunal is established under Section 11 of the Landlord and Tenants (Shops, Hotels The Competition Tribunal is established under Section 71(1) of the Competition Act, Cap 504 Laws of Kenya. and Catering Establishments) Act ,Cap .301 Laws of Kenya. Jurisdiction Jurisdiction The Tribunal has Jurisdiction to hear and determine the following : • To protect the Tenant from arbitrary eviction and exploitation. • Matters referred to it for review of the Competition Authority’s decision on mergers and acquisition • To ensure that the Landlord gets returns for his investment. under the Act; • Timely hearing and determination of tenancy disputes in controlled tenancies. • Appeals from the decisions of the Authority; • To create a conducive environment for business to thrive. • To handle termination of tenancies in business premises under controlled tenancies.
  • Land Evaluation in Kakamega District. Part 1

    Land Evaluation in Kakamega District. Part 1

    KE I33o. 06 Land evaluation in Kakamega District. A qualitative and quantitative land evaluation : for Soy and Lumakanda Locations, West Kenya. Part 1: Text. Rene PM van Dongen & Joris Frenke! University of Utrecht Faculty of Geographical Sciences April 1390 •* : ;' " Scanned from original by ISRIC - World Soil Information, as ICSU World Data Centre for Soils. The purpose is to make a safe depository for endangered documents and to make the accrued information available for consultation, following Fair Use Guidelines. Every effort is taken to respect Copyright of the materials within the archives where the identification of the Copyright holder is clear and, where feasible, to contact the originators. For questions please contact soil.isricfflwur.nl indicating the item reference number concerned. 32? 'Listen Ocol my old friend. The ways of your ancestors are good, their customs are solid and not hollow. They are not thin, not easily breakable. They can not be blown away by the winds because their roots reach deep into the soil.' Okot p'Bitek 'Song of Lawino1 ? ! CONTENTS. pag. ACKNOWLEX3DEMENTS , 5 IJST OF FIGURES AND TABLES 6 LIST OF MAPS AND APPENDICES IN PART 2 8 CHAPTER I: LAND EVALUATION IN KAKAMEGA DISTRICT. 1. 1 Introduction to Land Evaluation in Kakamega District 11 CHAPTER 2: GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE RESEARCH AREA. 2. 1 Physical Geographical Land Unit Mapping. 17 2. 1. 1 Introduction. 17 2. 1. 2 Climate and Agro-Ecological Zones 18 2. 1. 3 Geology 22 2. 1. 4 Land use ,. 22 2. 1. 5 The physical-geographical landunit map 23 2. 1. 5. 1 Source maps 23 2.
  • East and Southern Africa Faith Based Organizations Male Circumcision Consultation

    East and Southern Africa Faith Based Organizations Male Circumcision Consultation

    East and Southern Africa Faith Based Organizations Male Circumcision Consultation Male Adolescent Circumcision for HIV PPPreventionPrevention and asasas an Entry Point for Sexual aaandand Reproductive HealthHealth:::: TTTheThe Role of FBOs Brakenhurst Conference Centre Limuru, Kenya 20-21 September 2007 Meeting Summary Report With the technical and financial support of WHO & in collaboration with UNAIDS, UNFPA & UNICEF Table of Contents List of abbreviations and Acronyms ................................................................................................. 2 Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 3 1. Background................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 2. Purpose........................................................................................................................................ 7 3. Participants .................................................................................................................................. 8 4. Summary of meeting agenda....................................................................................................... 8 5. Opening Remarks ........................................................................................................................ 9 6. Key Presentations on Male Circumcision, HIV Prevention and Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health........................................................................................................................