Ecology Assessment Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ecology Assessment Report Ecology Assessment Report Release Notice This document is available through the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Project controlled document system TeamBinder™. The responsibility for ensuring that printed copies remain valid rests with the user. Once printed, this is an uncontrolled document unless issued and stamped Controlled Copy. Third-party issue can be requested via the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Project Document Control Group. Document Conventions The following terms in this document apply: • Will, shall or must indicate a mandatory course of action • Should indicates a recommended course of action • May or can indicate a possible course of action. Document Custodian The custodian of this document is the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Project – Environmental Approvals – Team Leader. The custodian is responsible for maintaining and controlling changes (additions and modifications) to this document and ensuring the stakeholders validate any changes made to this document. Deviations from Document Any deviation from this document must be approved by the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Project – Environmental Approvals - Team Leader. Doc Ref: Q-4500-15-RP-0094 Revision: 0 Page 2 of 54 Environmental Approvals, Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Uncontrolled when printed unless issued and stamped Controlled Copy. Ecology Assessment Report Table of Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................ 6 1.1. Scope of Works ............................................................................................. 6 1.1.1. Ecological Assessment Field Survey Methodology .................................................... 6 1.1.2. Field Survey ................................................................................................ 7 1.2. Definitions & Abbreviations ............................................................................ 10 1.2.1. Definitions ............................................................................................... 10 1.2.2. Abbreviations ............................................................................................ 10 1.2.3. Document References .................................................................................. 11 2. Site context .......................................................................................... 14 2.1. Bioregion .................................................................................................. 14 2.2. Land Use ................................................................................................... 14 2.3. Soils and Geology ........................................................................................ 14 2.4. Climate .................................................................................................... 14 2.5. Site Description .......................................................................................... 14 3. Methodology ......................................................................................... 15 3.1. Desktop and Literature Review ....................................................................... 15 3.2. Field Survey ............................................................................................... 15 3.2.1. Vegetation Community Survey ........................................................................ 16 3.2.2. Habitat Surveys .......................................................................................... 16 3.2.3. Threatened Flora and Fauna Survey .................................................................. 17 3.2.4. Exotic Flora and Fauna Survey ........................................................................ 17 3.2.5. Disturbance Survey ..................................................................................... 17 3.2.6. Survey Limitations ...................................................................................... 17 4. Results and Discussions ............................................................................. 18 4.1. Desktop and Literature Review ....................................................................... 18 4.1.1. Commonwealth Environmental Matters .............................................................. 18 4.1.2. Queensland Environmental Matters .................................................................. 20 4.2. Field survey ............................................................................................... 24 4.2.1. Commonwealth Environmental Matters .............................................................. 24 4.2.2. Queensland Environmental Matters .................................................................. 29 4.2.3. Weeds and Pests ........................................................................................ 37 4.2.4. Watercourses and Wetland Ecosystems .............................................................. 38 4.2.5. Disturbance .............................................................................................. 38 5. Conclusions and Recommendations .............................................................. 41 6. Appendix A: Site Locality Map ..................................................................... 43 Doc Ref: Q-4500-15-RP-0094 Revision: 0 Page 3 of 54 Environmental Approvals, Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Uncontrolled when printed unless issued and stamped Controlled Copy. Ecology Assessment Report 7. Appendix B: Ecological Survey locations ........................................................ 44 8. Appendix C: EPBC Protected Matters Search results .......................................... 45 9. Appendix D: Wildlife Online database search results .......................................... 46 10. Appendix E: Environmentally sensitive areas mapping ........................................ 47 11. Appendix F: EHP Regional Ecosystems mapping ................................................ 48 12. Appendix G: Wetlands and Watercourses ....................................................... 49 13. Appendix H: Flora and Fauna recorded on Site ................................................. 50 14. Appendix I: Potential EPBC Threatened Ecological Communities ............................ 51 15. Appendix J: Threatened Species identified within the Site................................... 52 16. Appendix K: Ground Truthed Regional Ecosystems ............................................ 53 17. Appendix L: Recorded Declared Flora and Pest Fauna ........................................ 54 List of Tables Table 1: Definitions ............................................................................................... 10 Table 2: Abbreviations ............................................................................................ 10 Table 3: Associated Document References .................................................................... 11 Table 4: EPBC Act protected matters search tool results for threatened ecological communities potentially occurring on Site. ................................................................................... 18 Table 5: EPBC protected matters search tool results for threatened species potentially occurring on Site ............................................................................................................... 19 Table 6: NC Act (Wildlife online) search tool results for threatened species potentially occurring near Site ............................................................................................................. 20 Table 7: REs mapped as potentially present on Site ........................................................ 21 Table 8: REs mapped as potentially present on Site ........................................................ 22 Table 9: HVR mapped as potentially present on Site ....................................................... 22 Table 10: Weeds and pest fauna potentially present on Site .............................................. 22 Table 11: Threatened Ecological Communities identified during field survey .......................... 24 Table 12: EPBC protected flora species potential to occur on the Site. ................................. 25 Table 13: EPBC protected fauna species present or potentially present on Site based on field survey results ....................................................................................................... 26 Table 14: NC Act listed threatened flora potentially occurring on Site ................................. 29 Table 15: NC Act listed threatened fauna or its habitat identified on Site ............................. 30 Table 16: Endangered and of concern REs identified to be present on Site ............................ 34 Table 17: No concern at present REs identified to be present on Site ................................... 36 Table 18: HVR mapped on Site .................................................................................. 37 Table 19: Weed flora recorded during the ecological field survey on Site .............................. 37 Table 21: Disturbance type, age, severity and frequency of occurrence on the Site. ................ 39 Doc Ref: Q-4500-15-RP-0094 Revision: 0 Page 4 of 54 Environmental Approvals, Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Uncontrolled when printed unless issued and stamped Controlled Copy. Ecology Assessment Report Release Notice This document is available through the Australia Pacific LNG
Recommended publications
  • Winter Edition 2020 - 3 in This Issue: Office Bearers for 2017
    1 Australian Plants Society Armidale & District Group PO Box 735 Armidale NSW 2350 web: www.austplants.com.au/Armidale e-mail: [email protected] Crowea exalata ssp magnifolia image by Maria Hitchcock Winter Edition 2020 - 3 In this issue: Office bearers for 2017 ......p1 Editorial …...p2Error! Bookmark not defined. New Website Arrangements .…..p3 Solstice Gathering ......p4 Passion, Boers & Hibiscus ......p5 Wollomombi Falls Lookout ......p7 Hard Yakka ......p8 Torrington & Gibraltar after fires ......p9 Small Eucalypts ......p12 Drought tolerance of plants ......p15 Armidale & District Group PO Box 735, Armidale NSW 2350 President: Vacant Vice President: Colin Wilson Secretary: Penelope Sinclair Ph. 6771 5639 [email protected] Treasurer: Phil Rose Ph. 6775 3767 [email protected] Membership: Phil Rose [email protected] 2 Markets in the Mall, Outings, OHS & Environmental Officer and Arboretum Coordinator: Patrick Laher Ph: 0427327719 [email protected] Newsletter Editor: John Nevin Ph: 6775218 [email protected],net.au Meet and Greet: Lee Horsley Ph: 0421381157 [email protected] Afternoon tea: Deidre Waters Ph: 67753754 [email protected] Web Master: Eric Sinclair Our website: http://www.austplants.com.au From the Editor: We have certainly had a memorable year - the worst drought in living memory followed by the most extensive bushfires seen in Australia, and to top it off, the biggest pandemic the world has seen in 100 years. The pandemic has made essential self distancing and quarantining to arrest the spread of the Corona virus. As a result, most APS activities have been shelved for the time being. Being in isolation at home has been a mixed blessing.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology Assessment Report Pre-Clearance Survey Report
    2 Ecology Assessment Report Pre-clearance Survey Report Consultant/contractor and sub-contractor document review/approval 48DY69, 46DY69, 69DY97, 70DY97, 74DY99, 14DY67, 2RP840942, Warra-Kogan Road reserve, Lot no. Healey's Crossing Road reserve, Dalby-Kogan Road reserve Property name Various Disturbance Tracker no. DP139 Origin/Australia Pacific LNG document no. Q-4331-15-RP-001 Contractor internal reference no. (if 17BRI-7037 applicable) Submitted by (full name of author) Kate Brodie, Loren Appleby, Emma Blacklock Consultant/contractor N/A comments Pre-clearance Survey Report expiry N/A date Technical Revision Date Status Checked Q/A Review 1 12/12/2017 Issued for Use L Appleby L Appleby L Appleby 2 27/08/2018 Issued for Use Liz Fisher Liz Fisher Ailsa Kerswell pp. pp. pp. Template Ref: Q-LNG01-15-AQ-0225 Revision: 2 Approvals, Land and Stakeholder, Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Uncontrolled when printed unless issued and stamped controlled copy. Rev. 0 approved by (name and title) Signature Tim Collins Kainama Development (Stage 1) – Terrestrial Ecology Survey Report Prepared for Origin Energy th 27 August 2018 Kainama Stage 1 Terrestrial Ecology Assessment DOCUMENT TRACKING Item Detail Project Name Kainama Development Stage 1 Ecology Survey Project Number 17BRI-7037 Loren Appleby Project Manager 07 3239 9401 Level 5 / 12 Creek St Brisbane Qld 4000 Prepared by Kate Brodie, Loren Appleby, Emma Blacklock Reviewed by Liz Fisher, Alan House Approved by Ailsa Kerswell Status Final Version Number Revision 2 Last saved on 27th August 2018 Cover Photo Philotheca sporadica and Eucalyputs curtisii, Loren Appleby, 2017. This report should be cited as ‘Eco Logical Australia 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Amyema Quandang (Lindl.) Tiegh
    Australian Tropical Rainforest Plants - Online edition Amyema quandang (Lindl.) Tiegh. Family: Loranthaceae Tieghem, P.E.L. van (1894), Bulletin de la Societe Botanique de France 41: 507. Common name: Grey Mistletoe Stem Mistletoe, pendulous. Attached to branch by haustoria, epicortical runners (runners spreading across host bark) absent. Stems very finely white tomentose or scurfy with indumentum of very small,obscure, more or less stellate scales or hairs. Leaves Flowers. CC-BY: APII, ANBG. Leaves simple, opposite, sub-opposite or occasionally alternate. Stipules absent. Petiole 4-12 mm long. Leaf blade lanceolate to ovate, elliptic, sometimes falcate, 3-13 cm long, 0.8-4.5 cm wide, base ± cuneate or obtuse, margins entire, apex obtuse to acute. Longitudinally veined with 3 or 5 veins, obscure on both surfaces. White tomentose or scurfy on leaf surfaces with an indumentum of very small, obscure, more or less stellate scales/hairs, becoming sparse with age. Flowers Inflorescences axillary, flowers in umbel-like triads (groups of 3). Central flower sessile and lateral flowers stalked; pedicels 1-3 mm long. Flowers bisexual, actinomorphic, 5-merous. Calyx cupular about 1 mm long, entire without any lobing. Petals 5, free or shortly fused at base, becoming recurved at anthesis, 1.5-3 cm long, green, maroon to red tinged, with a short whit tomentum. Flowers in triads. CC-BY: APII, Stamens 5, epipetalous (attached to petals), red, anthers 2-4 mm long. Ovary inferior. ANBG. Fruit Fruit fleshy, a berry, ovoid, pear-shaped to globose, 6-10 mm long, greyish tomentose. Calyx remnants persistent at the apex forming an apical tube.
    [Show full text]
  • Grass Genera in Townsville
    Grass Genera in Townsville Nanette B. Hooker Photographs by Chris Gardiner SCHOOL OF MARINE and TROPICAL BIOLOGY JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY TOWNSVILLE QUEENSLAND James Cook University 2012 GRASSES OF THE TOWNSVILLE AREA Welcome to the grasses of the Townsville area. The genera covered in this treatment are those found in the lowland areas around Townsville as far north as Bluewater, south to Alligator Creek and west to the base of Hervey’s Range. Most of these genera will also be found in neighbouring areas although some genera not included may occur in specific habitats. The aim of this book is to provide a description of the grass genera as well as a list of species. The grasses belong to a very widespread and large family called the Poaceae. The original family name Gramineae is used in some publications, in Australia the preferred family name is Poaceae. It is one of the largest flowering plant families of the world, comprising more than 700 genera, and more than 10,000 species. In Australia there are over 1300 species including non-native grasses. In the Townsville area there are more than 220 grass species. The grasses have highly modified flowers arranged in a variety of ways. Because they are highly modified and specialized, there are also many new terms used to describe the various features. Hence there is a lot of terminology that chiefly applies to grasses, but some terms are used also in the sedge family. The basic unit of the grass inflorescence (The flowering part) is the spikelet. The spikelet consists of 1-2 basal glumes (bracts at the base) that subtend 1-many florets or flowers.
    [Show full text]
  • Acacia Burrowii Maiden
    WATTLE Acacias of Australia Acacia burrowii Maiden Source: Australian Plant Image Index Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: Australian Plant Image Index (dig.23654). Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com (dig.23655). ANBG © M. Fagg, 2012 J. & M. Simmons J. & M. Simmons ANBG © M. Fagg, 2012 Source: Australian Plant Image Index Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. (dig.23656). Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com ANBG © M. Fagg, 2012 Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com J. & M. Simmons Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Acacia burrow ii occurrence map. O ccurrence map generated via Atlas of Living Australia (https://w w w .ala.org.au). Common Name Burrow’s Wattle Family Fabaceae Distribution Occurs on the North Western Plains of N.S.W. from Cobar-Nyngan area N to Yetman (including the Pilliga Scrub), and in south-eastern Qld from the Goodiwindi– Moonie area N to Eidsvold, W of 151ºE. Description Tree to 13 m high, single-stemmed. Bark ribbony, grey. Branchlets angular towards apices, red-brown, scurfy, glabrous, ±resinous. Phyllodes narrowly to very narrowly elliptic, flat, straight or slightly curved, (2–) 3–11 cm long, (2–) 4–10 mm wide (juveniles to 14 mm wide and scurfy), coriaceous, with 1–3 slightly prominent main nerves; minor nerves 8–10 per mm, parallel, not anastomosing; gland 1, basal, to 1 mm above pulvinus.
    [Show full text]
  • NEWSLETTER No -70 MARCH 1992
    AlAstraliaYJ S~stematic · · . BotaVl~ 5ociet~ . NEWSLETTER No -70 MARCH 1992 Dodonaea heteromorpha West . Price: $5.00 Registered by Australia Post Publication No. NBH 8068 ~ . , ISSN 1034-1218 AUSTRALIAN SYSTEMATIC BOTANY SOCIETY INCORPORATED . Office Bearers Pre~ide-nt Dr J.G. West Australian National Herbarium GPO ~Box 1600 CANBERRAACT2601 - Tel (06) 246 5113 Fax (06) 246 5000 Vice Pr-esident Secretary-~ Treasurer Dr G.P. Guymer Dr B.J. Conn Dr D.B. Foreman Queensland Herbarium National Herbarium of NSW · National Herbarium of Victoria Meiers Road Mrs Macquaries Road Birdwood Avenue INDOOROOPILLY QLJ:) 4068 SYDNEY NSW 2000 . SOU'I;H YARRAVIC3141 Tel (07) 377 9320 - Tel (02) 231 8131 Tel (03) 655 23oo Fax-(07) 870 327§ Fax (02) 251 4403 Fax (03) 650 5917 Councillors Dr J.A. Chappill Dr J.M. Powell DepartmentofBotany National Herbarium of NSW University of Western Australia Mrs MadJQaries Road NEDLANDS WA 6009 .SYDNEY NSW 2000" _'Tel (09) 380 2212 · Tel (02) 2:U 8135t . Fax (09) 380 1001, · FaJS (02) 251 4403 _ Affiliated So~iety ·Papua New Guinea Botanical Society Australian Botanical Liais-on Officer Dr P.S. Short Royal Botanic Gardens Kew Richmond, s'urrey. TW9 JAB. ENGLAND. Tel 44-81-940-1171 Fax 44-81C::B2-5278 Austral. Syst. Bot. Soc. Newsletter 70 (March 1992) 1 EDITORIAL It seems to me that systematics is at a cross­ slide, if not reverse the trend entirely. roads. During most of this century, taxonomy has There have been a couple of recent publications been on the decline from its pre-eminent position in discussing the details of these issues that are worth the biology of the previous two centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vegetation of the Western Blue Mountains Including the Capertee, Coxs, Jenolan & Gurnang Areas
    Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW) The Vegetation of the Western Blue Mountains including the Capertee, Coxs, Jenolan & Gurnang Areas Volume 1: Technical Report Hawkesbury-Nepean CMA CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY The Vegetation of the Western Blue Mountains (including the Capertee, Cox’s, Jenolan and Gurnang Areas) Volume 1: Technical Report (Final V1.1) Project funded by the Hawkesbury – Nepean Catchment Management Authority Information and Assessment Section Metropolitan Branch Environmental Protection and Regulation Division Department of Environment and Conservation July 2006 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This project has been completed by the Special thanks to: Information and Assessment Section, Metropolitan Branch. The numerous land owners including State Forests of NSW who allowed access to their Section Head, Information and Assessment properties. Julie Ravallion The Department of Natural Resources, Forests NSW and Hawkesbury – Nepean CMA for Coordinator, Bioregional Data Group comments on early drafts. Daniel Connolly This report should be referenced as follows: Vegetation Project Officer DEC (2006) The Vegetation of the Western Blue Mountains. Unpublished report funded by Greg Steenbeeke the Hawkesbury – Nepean Catchment Management Authority. Department of GIS, Data Management and Database Environment and Conservation, Hurstville. Coordination Peter Ewin Photos Kylie Madden Vegetation community profile photographs by Greg Steenbeeke Greg Steenbeeke unless otherwise noted. Feature cover photo by Greg Steenbeeke. All Logistics
    [Show full text]
  • Eriachne Triseta Nees Ex Steud
    Grasses of Cape Yorkork - Quinkan Country Eriachne triseta Nees ex Steud. This species is very widespread and common across northern Australia. It is an erect to sometimes drooping, tufted perennial between 60 cm and 120 cm high (Fig. 1). Plants are mostly glabrous with the base of the plant slightly thickened or knotty, and pubescent (softly hairy). Leaf blades are thin and bristle like to 25 cm long, with the flowering branch sparse and often drooping. Eriachne triseta has two bisexual florets (modified flowers) per spikelet (the basic flowering unit), each floret is distinctly, although shortly, three awned, a rare occurrence in the genus (Figs. 2a & b). Fig. 1. Habit of Eriachne triseta FACT SHEET: GRASSES OF CAPE YORK - QUINKAN COUNTRY - Eriachne triseta | PAGE 1 of 3 > BOTANICAL DESCRIPTION Spikelets are few per branch, each spikelet is defined A perennial species 60-120 cm high. The leaves and by two glumes 8-15 mm long, and contains two culms are mostly glabrous with the base of plant bisexual florets, the florets are shorter than the slightly thickened or knotty, pubescent. The leaf glumes. The lemma of each floret is awned, the lemma sheaths are usually half as long as the culm internode, awn is 8-14 mm long, with the palea of each floret and the blades are up to 25 cm long, are convolute, splitting to form two awns slightly shorter than the setaceous (bristle like), finely pointed and often lemma awn, between 6-11.5 mm long (Fig. 2a & b). flexuose (bent from side to side or curved).
    [Show full text]
  • Inquiry Into Ecosystem Decline in Victoria
    LC EPC Inquiry into Ecosystem Decline in Victoria Submission 100 Inquiry into Ecosystem Decline in riverside woodland each spring, to follow up the major project, and that is very impressive. Victoria Pre-Europeans, there was a significant population of The extent of the decline of Victoria’s biodiversity Manna Gum in the area, but the last big old tree died Vegetation: trees and collapsed five years ago, so my group has planted about 10 as the start of an effort to reintroduce this In 1993 Randall Robinson was employed by Heidel- species. berg Council to develop a flora species list for Wilson Reserve, Ivanhoe East. He identified 172 species, of Shrubs which 101 were weeds, some of them very minor but The pre-European landscape in Ivanhoe included many of them very serious threats to the riverside about 10 shrub species (up to 10 m tall), but after habitats. In the 27 years since then, especially since many decades of the Yarra’s north bank being the council amalgamations in 1996, Banyule Council devoted to dairy farming, to the 1930s, only two have has somewhat increased its commitment to habitat survived: Tree Violet and Prickly Currant Bush, both management and restoration. But very large parts of of which are super-abundant, far more than would be the Yarra riverside environment within Banyule are the case in a healthy mixed-species ecosystem. So my not managed at all and Banyule has made it clear it Friends group has, among other things, planted has no intention of managing it. hundreds of shrub seedlings of the species that went The unmanaged sections are as a result overwhelmed missing: Blackwood wattle, Prickly Moses wattle, by a variety of weed species: trees, shrubs, ground- Hazel pomaderris, Victorian Christmas Bush, Hop covers, grasses, climbing creepers.
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns of Flammability Across the Vascular Plant Phylogeny, with Special Emphasis on the Genus Dracophyllum
    Lincoln University Digital Thesis Copyright Statement The digital copy of this thesis is protected by the Copyright Act 1994 (New Zealand). This thesis may be consulted by you, provided you comply with the provisions of the Act and the following conditions of use: you will use the copy only for the purposes of research or private study you will recognise the author's right to be identified as the author of the thesis and due acknowledgement will be made to the author where appropriate you will obtain the author's permission before publishing any material from the thesis. Patterns of flammability across the vascular plant phylogeny, with special emphasis on the genus Dracophyllum A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of philosophy at Lincoln University by Xinglei Cui Lincoln University 2020 Abstract of a thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of philosophy. Abstract Patterns of flammability across the vascular plant phylogeny, with special emphasis on the genus Dracophyllum by Xinglei Cui Fire has been part of the environment for the entire history of terrestrial plants and is a common disturbance agent in many ecosystems across the world. Fire has a significant role in influencing the structure, pattern and function of many ecosystems. Plant flammability, which is the ability of a plant to burn and sustain a flame, is an important driver of fire in terrestrial ecosystems and thus has a fundamental role in ecosystem dynamics and species evolution. However, the factors that have influenced the evolution of flammability remain unclear.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vegetation of Granitic Outcrop Communities on the New England Batholith of Eastern Australia
    547 The vegetation of granitic outcrop communities on the New England Batholith of eastern Australia John T. Hunter and Peter J. Clarke Hunter, John T. and Clarke, Peter J. (Division of Botany, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2350) 1998. The vegetation of granitic outcrop communities on the New England Batholith of eastern Australia. Cunninghamia 5 (3): 547–618. The vegetation of 22 areas of granitic outcrops on the New England Batholith has been surveyed using semi-quantitative quadrat sampling. In total 399 0.1 ha quadrats were placed on 216 outcrops. Twenty-eight plant communities in nine major groups and an additional unsurveyed community are circumscribed. A high number of nationally rare or threatened taxa, many of which are restricted to outcrop areas, have been found in these communities along with many taxa of special note. Previous studies have over-emphasised structure which can vary considerably with negligible floristic change. Suggestions are made on potential areas for reservation. Introduction Studies concentrating on the vegetation of granitic outcrops have been undertaken throughout the world (e.g. Whitehouse 1933; Oosting & Anderson 1937; McVaugh 1943; Keever et al. 1951; Keever 1957; Hambler 1964; Murdy et al. 1970; Sharitz & McCormick 1973; Rundel 1975; Shure & Fagsdale 1977; Wyatt 1977; Phillips 1981; Phillips 1982; Wyatt 1981; Baskin & Baskin 1982; Walters 1982; Burbanck & Phillips 1983; Wyatt 1984a, b; Uno & Collins 1987; Baskin & Baskin 1988; Houle & Phillips 1988; Houle & Phillips 1989a, b; Houle 1990; Porembski et al. 1994; Ibisch et al. 1995; Porembski 1995; Porembski et al. 1996). Research into outcrops, and in particular granitic outcrops, has culminated in the formation of the ‘Inselberg-Projeckt’ supported by the Deutsche Forschungsge-meinschaft (Porembski et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Delayed Colonisation of Acacia by Thrips and the Timing of Host
    McLeish et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2013, 13:188 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/13/188 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Delayed colonisation of Acacia by thrips and the timing of host-conservatism and behavioural specialisation Michael J McLeish1*, Joseph T Miller2 and Laurence A Mound3 Abstract Background: Repeated colonisation of novel host-plants is believed to be an essential component of the evolutionary success of phytophagous insects. The relative timing between the origin of an insect lineage and the plant clade they eat or reproduce on is important for understanding how host-range expansion can lead to resource specialisation and speciation. Path and stepping-stone sampling are used in a Bayesian approach to test divergence timing between the origin of Acacia and colonisation by thrips. The evolution of host-plant conservatism and ecological specialisation is discussed. Results: Results indicated very strong support for a model describing the origin of the common ancestor of Acacia thrips subsequent to that of Acacia. A current estimate puts the origin of Acacia at approximately 6 million years before the common ancestor of Acacia thrips, and 15 million years before the origin of a gall-inducing clade. The evolution of host conservatism and resource specialisation resulted in a phylogenetically under-dispersed pattern of host-use by several thrips lineages. Conclusions: Thrips colonised a diversity of Acacia species over a protracted period as Australia experienced aridification. Host conservatism evolved on phenotypically and environmentally suitable host lineages. Ecological specialisation resulted from habitat selection and selection on thrips behavior that promoted primary and secondary host associations. These findings suggest that delayed and repeated colonisation is characterised by cycles of oligo- or poly-phagy.
    [Show full text]