Introduction Chapter 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Introduction Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 A Introduction On the occurrence of the Indian Eagle Owl Bubo bengalensis it can be best said in the words of T. C. Jerdon (1862), 'There is not a rocky hill in the Camatic (present day Kamataka state in south India), nor a ravine in the Deccan, where this owl may not be seen on the summit of a Indian, or a ledge, till long after sunrise, and looming large against the clear sky looking more like a quadruped than a bird.' The only change unfortunately is that the owl is by no means that common today (Plate 1). Most owls are nocturnal while some species are crepuscular in habit. Though they are not easily seen, they have made a tremendous impact on human thinking. The owls have forward facing almost human like eyes, they can turn the head in almost foil circle in various planes, they have a silent flight, they are cryptically coloured and are difficulty to observe for a greater period of time and many owls utter an eerie call at night, hence they arouse a feeling of fear, awe and mystery and not surprisingly the owls are deeply shrouded in the fog of superstitions. Owls are persecuted and killed out of fear wrong beliefs. Therefore, owls are also relatively less studied birds. Rodents, shrews and other crop pests are recorded from the diet of owls and hence they are beneficial to the farmers. To throw hght on the life of one of the less studied owl species, I have undertaken the study of Indian Eagle Owl Bubo bengalensis. 1.1 B What is an owl? Owls are arboreal, chiefly nocturnal birds of prey, characterized by large, round heads, short necks, round long wings and comparatively short tail. They have large round forward facing eyes, large ears with acute hearing ability, aided by the round facial disc that helps focusing of sound in the asymmetrically placed ears. The bill is 1 short, hooked and partially covered with feathers. The tarsus and toes are feathered, outer toe is reversible and claws are strongly hooked. The plumage is cryptic in colour, the broad, rounded wings are soft, velvety and have serrated margins that impart the ability of silent and buoyant flight that is not swift. The food is principally rodents, they usually nest in hollows, the young are nidicolous and downy, and both parents attend the young (Ali and Ripley, 1969; Duncan, 2003). The word owl is derived from Middle English oule, from Old English ule, imitative in origin. So also in Sanskrit, the name Uluka for the owl is from its cry ululi. (Dave, 2007; Pande, Suruchi 2009). Owls are grouped under Order Strigiformes in the Family Strigidae and Family Tytonidae. Generally speaking the owls are nocturnal predatory birds. 1.2 Owls in the world The owls are found in almost all the habitats from tropical regions to the Arctic polar region. The owls are distributed in various zoogeographic zones of the world such as the Neotropical, the Ethiopian, Oriental and Australian zones, and also in the Palearctic and the Nearctic zones. In the analysis of 205 species of owls worldwide, there are 16 species of owls in the family Tytonidae and 189 species of owls in the family Strigidae; fiirther, the subfamily Striginae has 117 species and the tribe Bubonini has 25 species (Duncan, 2003). Since new species of owls continue to be discovered, presently, about 217 species of owls are recorded from the world (Rasmussen and Anderton, 2005). 1.3 Owls in the Indian Subcontinent About 38 species of owls (2 families and 12 genera) are recorded from the Indian Subcontinent. Further, Family Tytonidae has 5 and family Strigidae has 31 species of owls; 2 additional species {Strix seloputo from Nicobars and Strix hutleri from Mekran coast in Pakistan) are possibly recorded only once but there are no recent records. (Table 1) (Rasmussen and Anderton, 2005). 1.4 Genus Bubo Dumeril, 1806 Kingdom: Animalia, Phylum: Vertebrata, Class: Aves Order: Strigiformes, A] Family: Tytonidae (Bam, Grass and Bay owls) and B] Family: Strigidae (Owls, Owlets and allies), i) Subfamily: Striginae, Tribe: Bubonini (Eagle-Owls and dM\QS-Bubo (Table 2), Ketupa, Nyctea and Scotopelid). ii) Subfamily: Sumiinae, Tribes : Sumiini, Aaegolini, Ninoxini. iii) Subfamily: Asioninae. (The classification follows Ali and Ripley, 1969) The recent classification as per Wikipedia is as follows: Superregnum: Eukaryota Supergroup: Unikonta Cladus: Opisthokonta Regnum: Animalia Subregnum: Eumetazoa Cladus: Bilateria Cladus: Nephrozoa Cladus: Deuterostomia Phylum: Chordata Subphylum: Vertebrata Infraphylum: Gnathostomata Superclassis: Tetrapoda Classis: Aves Subclassis: Carinatae Infraclassis: Neomithes Parvclassis: Neognathae Ordo: Strigiformes Familia: Strigidae Subfamilia: Striginae Genus: Bubo The Genus Bubo is quite well distributed in the world with 23 species but the members are not represented in Australia, New Zealand and further south (Table 2). The genus has the most species diversity in Africa and Asia. Almost a fourth of all the species in the genus Bubo are represented in India (Table 2 and 3). In all, 6 species of Bubo owls are recorded from India, particularly Bubo bubo. Bubo bengalensis (Plate 1), Bubo nipalensis, Bubo coromandus, Bubo zeylonensis and Bubo flavipes. The comparative data about their distribution, status, habitat, size, plumage, call, biometry, predominant pellet contents, nest sites and eggs of each species are summarized in Table 3. 1.5 A. The Indian Eagle Owl Bubo bengalensis (Franklin, 1831) (Plate 1) 1.5 B. ETYMOLOGY Latin. Bubo, the eagle owl; Latin bengalensis, Related to Bengal, formerly denoting North-East India (Pande 2009). 1.6 NAMES 1.6 A. COMMON NAMES Indian Eagle-Owl Bubo bengalensis syn. Bubo bubo bengalensis (Franklin), is also called Indian Great Homed Owl, Eagle Owl, The Indian Homed Owl, Northem Eagle-Owl, Rock Eagle-Owl and Great Homed Owl. (Jerdon, 1862; Baker, 1922-1928; Ali and Ripley, 1969). 1.6 B. LOCAL NAMES Ghugu (Hindi); Gug (Sind); Hutom pecha (Bengal); Ghubad (Marathi); Ghuwad (Gujarati); Yerra gudla gubad (Telugu); Komban andai (Tamil); Komban munga (Malayalam). (Jerdon, 1862; Ali and Ripley, 1969). 1.6 C. SANSKRIT NAMES Uluka, Pechaka, Vayasarati, Divandha, Kausika, Ghuka, Divabhita, Nisatana Ghutkaraka, Hridilochana Naktachari, Kausi, Ghargaraka, Bhiru, Kakasatru, Pingala, Dudula, Vrksarayi, Brhadravin, Pingalaksha, Bhyankara, Tamasa, Kuvi, Ulukceti, Hikka, Kankasi, Kontha, Kakari, Harilocana, Nisadarsi, Bahusvana, Mahapakshi, Krsna, Naktaka, and Krtamalaka. (Dave, 1985; Pande, Sumchi, 2007). 1.7 A. ZOOLOGICAL NOMENCLATURE Kingdom: Animalia, Phylum: Vertebrata, Class: Aves, Order: Strigiformes, Familiy : Strigidae (Owls, Owlets and allies). Subfamily: Striginae, Tribe : Strigini. (Eagle-Owls and dMiQS-Bubo, Ketupa, Nyctea and Scotopelid). Genus: 5w6oDumeril, 1806, Zool. Ananlytique : 34. Type by tautonymy, Strix bubo Linnaeus. Bubo bubo (Linnaeus) Cf. Vaurie, C, 1963, American Mus. Novitates, No. 2132:1- 10. Bubo bubo bengalensis (Franklin) Otus bengalensis Franklin, 1831 (1830-31), Proc. Zool. Soc. London:! 15. (The Ganges between Calcutta and Benares and in the Vindhyan Hills between the latter place and Gurra Mundela) Baker FBI No. 1660, Vol. 4:414 (Ali and Ripley, 1969). 1.7 B. CHRONOLOGICAL HISTORY OF NOMENCLATURE Otus bengalensis Franklin, 1831 (1830-31) Proc, Zool. Soc. London: 115. Baker, FBI No. 1660, Vol. 4-414. P.Z.S. 1831-Sydes, Cat. 18-Grould, Cent. Him. Birds, PI. 3- Blyt, Cat. 143-Hors., Cat 88-Jerdon, Cat. 43-U. Cavearia, Hodgson. Urrua bengalensis, Franklin(Jerdon, 1862). 1.7 C. SUBSPECIES OR RACES Four subspecies are described (Ali and Ripley, 1969) on the basis of colouration and wing lengh: Bubo bubo bengalensis (Franklin) : darkest, richly coloured and wing 370-433 mm. B.b. tibetanus Bianchi: dark and browner with wing 420-465 mm. B.b. turcomanus (Eversmann): paler, grayer, feathered toes hide claws; wing 435-513 mm. B.b. hemanchalana Hume : palest, sharp streaks on hind crown, wing 433-508 mm. 1.7 D. BUBO BENGALENSIS RECOGNIZED AS A SPECIES The races Bubo bubo turcomanus (Turkestan Homed or Eagle-Owl), B.b. tibetanus (Tibetan Homed or Eagle Owl) and B. b. hemachalana (Himalayan Homed or Eagle Owl) (Plate 2) (vide AH and Ripley, 1969, Synopsis nos. 625-626a and Vaurie, 1965) are now grouped under a separate species Bubo bubo. The Eurasian Eagle-Owl and race Bubo bubo bengalensis is elevated to a species rank as Indian Eagle-Owl {B.bengalensis) (Buceros, 1988 Vol. 3, August, No.2). So also, on the basis of DNA classification, Indian Eagle-Owl Bubo bengalensis and Eurasian Eagle-Owl Bubo bubo are designated as separate species (Wink and Heidrich, 1999). 1.8 STATUS AND KNOWN DISTRIBUTION The Indian Eagle Owl Bubo bengalensis syn. Bubo bubo bengalensis, Franklin, is endemic resident of the Indian subcontinent and is found from coastal regions up to 1500 m altitude and rarely up to 2400 m altitude in Western Himalayas. From Kashmir, in India (with adjacent Punjab province and Kohat, Peshawar and Rawalpindi districts in Pakistan), it extends eastwards up to West-Central Nepal. It is not reported from Sikkim, Bhutan or North East Frontier Agency, but may be found there. It occurs from Rajasthan state in the west, across Gangetic Plain to the states of Assam, Nagaland and Manipur, through Bangladesh and also Myanmar. Southward it is found in Peninsular India up to Kanyakumari in suitable habitats. It is not recorded from Sri Lanka and Andaman and Nicobar Islands (Jerdon, 1862; Baker, 1922-1928; Ali and Ripley, 1969; Duncan, 2003). 1.9 FIELD IDENTIFICATION 1.9 A. Based on appearance: The large size with the overall height similar to the village hen, the 'horn-like' erect feather tufts on the crown, the 'cat-like' round face, the yellow iris, the vertical stance and the cryptic brown-buff plumage with streaks on the chest and belly are helpftil to identify this owl in the field. (Table 3) (Plates 1, 2) (Ali and Ripley, 1969).
Recommended publications
  • Rediscovery, Biology, Vocalisations and Taxonomy of Fish Owls in Turkey
    Rediscovery, biology, vocalisations and taxonomy of fish owls in Turkey Arnoud B van den Berg, Soner Bekir, Peter de Knijff & The Sound Approach n the Western Palearctic (WP) region, Brown Distribution and traditional taxonomy IFish Owl Bubo zeylonensis is one of the rarest Until recently, fish owls were grouped under the and least-known birds. The species’ range is huge, genus Ketupa. However, recent DNA research has from the Mediterranean east to Indochina, but it is shown that for reasons of paraphyly it is better to probably only in India and Sri Lanka that it is include this genus together with Scotopelia and regularly observed. In the 19th and 20th century, Nyctea in Bubo. Former Ketupa species, Brown a total of c 15 documented records became known Fish Owl, Tawny Fish Owl B flavipes and Buffy of the westernmost and palest taxon, semenowi, Fish Owl B ketupu cluster as close relatives of and no definite breeding was described for the Asian Bubo species like Spot-bellied Eagle-Owl WP. These records included just one for Turkey in B nipalensis and Barred Eagle-Owl B sumatranus the 20th century, in 1990. However, while the (König et al 1999, Sangster et al 2003, Knox 2008, species appears to be extinct in other WP coun- Wink et al 2008, Redactie Dutch Birding 2010). tries, several pairs have been found in southern Based on external morphology and geography, Turkey since 2004. New findings in 2009-10 cre- four subspecies of Brown Fish Owl are tradition- ated a rapid increase in our understanding of the ally recognized.
    [Show full text]
  • Gtr Pnw343.Pdf
    Abstract Marcot, Bruce G. 1995. Owls of old forests of the world. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW- GTR-343. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 64 p. A review of literature on habitat associations of owls of the world revealed that about 83 species of owls among 18 genera are known or suspected to be closely asso- ciated with old forests. Old forest is defined as old-growth or undisturbed forests, typically with dense canopies. The 83 owl species include 70 tropical and 13 tem- perate forms. Specific habitat associations have been studied for only 12 species (7 tropical and 5 temperate), whereas about 71 species (63 tropical and 8 temperate) remain mostly unstudied. Some 26 species (31 percent of all owls known or sus- pected to be associated with old forests in the tropics) are entirely or mostly restricted to tropical islands. Threats to old-forest owls, particularly the island forms, include conversion of old upland forests, use of pesticides, loss of riparian gallery forests, and loss of trees with cavities for nests or roosts. Conservation of old-forest owls should include (1) studies and inventories of habitat associations, particularly for little-studied tropical and insular species; (2) protection of specific, existing temperate and tropical old-forest tracts; and (3) studies to determine if reforestation and vege- tation manipulation can restore or maintain habitat conditions. An appendix describes vocalizations of all species of Strix and the related genus Ciccaba. Keywords: Owls, old growth, old-growth forest, late-successional forests, spotted owl, owl calls, owl conservation, tropical forests, literature review.
    [Show full text]
  • Tc & Forward & Owls-I-IX
    USDA Forest Service 1997 General Technical Report NC-190 Biology and Conservation of Owls of the Northern Hemisphere Second International Symposium February 5-9, 1997 Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada Editors: James R. Duncan, Zoologist, Manitoba Conservation Data Centre Wildlife Branch, Manitoba Department of Natural Resources Box 24, 200 Saulteaux Crescent Winnipeg, MB CANADA R3J 3W3 <[email protected]> David H. Johnson, Wildlife Ecologist Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife 600 Capitol Way North Olympia, WA, USA 98501-1091 <[email protected]> Thomas H. Nicholls, retired formerly Project Leader and Research Plant Pathologist and Wildlife Biologist USDA Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station 1992 Folwell Avenue St. Paul, MN, USA 55108-6148 <[email protected]> I 2nd Owl Symposium SPONSORS: (Listing of all symposium and publication sponsors, e.g., those donating $$) 1987 International Owl Symposium Fund; Jack Israel Schrieber Memorial Trust c/o Zoological Society of Manitoba; Lady Grayl Fund; Manitoba Hydro; Manitoba Natural Resources; Manitoba Naturalists Society; Manitoba Critical Wildlife Habitat Program; Metro Propane Ltd.; Pine Falls Paper Company; Raptor Research Foundation; Raptor Education Group, Inc.; Raptor Research Center of Boise State University, Boise, Idaho; Repap Manitoba; Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada; USDI Bureau of Land Management; USDI Fish and Wildlife Service; USDA Forest Service, including the North Central Forest Experiment Station; Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife; The Wildlife Society - Washington Chapter; Wildlife Habitat Canada; Robert Bateman; Lawrence Blus; Nancy Claflin; Richard Clark; James Duncan; Bob Gehlert; Marge Gibson; Mary Houston; Stuart Houston; Edgar Jones; Katherine McKeever; Robert Nero; Glenn Proudfoot; Catherine Rich; Spencer Sealy; Mark Sobchuk; Tom Sproat; Peter Stacey; and Catherine Thexton.
    [Show full text]
  • New Birds in Africa New Birds in Africa
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NEWNEW BIRDSBIRDS ININ AFRICAAFRICA 8 9 10 11 The last 50 years 12 13 Text by Phil Hockey 14 15 Illustrations by Martin Woodcock from Birds of Africa, vols 3 and 4, 16 reproduced with kind permission of Academic Press, and 17 David Quinn (Algerian Nuthatch) reproduced from Tits, Nuthatches & 18 Treecreepers, with kind permission of Russel Friedman Books. 19 20 New birds are still being discovered in Africa and 21 elsewhere, proof that one of the secret dreams of most birders 22 23 can still be realized. This article deals specifically with African discoveries 24 and excludes nearby Madagascar. African discoveries have ranged from the cedar forests of 25 northern Algeria, site of the discovery of the Algerian Nuthatch 26 27 (above), all the way south to the east coast of South Africa. 28 29 ome of the recent bird discoveries in Africa have come case, of their discoverer. In 1972, the late Dr Alexandre 30 Sfrom explorations of poorly-known areas, such as the Prigogine described a new species of greenbul from 31 remote highland forests of eastern Zaïre. Other new spe- Nyamupe in eastern Zaïre, which he named Andropadus 32 cies have been described by applying modern molecular hallae. The bird has never been seen or collected since and 33 techniques capable of detecting major genetic differences Prigogine himself subse- quently decided that 34 between birds that were previously thought to be races of the specimen was of a melanis- 35 the same species. The recent ‘splitting’ of the Northern tic Little Greenbul Andropadus 36 and Southern black korhaans Eupodotis afraoides/afra of virens, a species with a 37 southern Africa is one example.
    [Show full text]
  • Thailand Highlights 14Th to 26Th November 2019 (13 Days)
    Thailand Highlights 14th to 26th November 2019 (13 days) Trip Report Siamese Fireback by Forrest Rowland Trip report compiled by Tour Leader: Forrest Rowland Trip Report – RBL Thailand - Highlights 2019 2 Tour Summary Thailand has been known as a top tourist destination for quite some time. Foreigners and Ex-pats flock there for the beautiful scenery, great infrastructure, and delicious cuisine among other cultural aspects. For birders, it has recently caught up to big names like Borneo and Malaysia, in terms of respect for the avian delights it holds for visitors. Our twelve-day Highlights Tour to Thailand set out to sample a bit of the best of every major habitat type in the country, with a slight focus on the lush montane forests that hold most of the country’s specialty bird species. The tour began in Bangkok, a bustling metropolis of winding narrow roads, flyovers, towering apartment buildings, and seemingly endless people. Despite the density and throng of humanity, many of the participants on the tour were able to enjoy a Crested Goshawk flight by Forrest Rowland lovely day’s visit to the Grand Palace and historic center of Bangkok, including a fun boat ride passing by several temples. A few early arrivals also had time to bird some of the urban park settings, even picking up a species or two we did not see on the Main Tour. For most, the tour began in earnest on November 15th, with our day tour of the salt pans, mudflats, wetlands, and mangroves of the famed Pak Thale Shore bird Project, and Laem Phak Bia mangroves.
    [Show full text]
  • Buffy Fish Owl Ketupa Ketupu Breeding in Sundarbans Tiger Reserve, India Manoj Sharma, Soma Jha & Atul Jain
    SHARMA ET. AL.: Buffy Fish Owl 27 Photos: Praveen ES 26. Short-tailed Shearwater in flight. 27. Wedge-tailed Shearwater. Though it is considered to be a vagrant in India, there are of these birds. We are grateful to Nameer P. O., College of Forestry, Kerala Agricultural reports of regular sightings of these birds off the western coasts University, for his support, and Social Forestry, Kerala Forest Department, for organising of the Malayan peninsula (Giri et al. 2013). This sighting from the trip. We wish to thank participants from the College of Forestry, Kerala Agricultural the Arabian Sea, first off the Kerala coast, together with the ones University; Sree Sankaracharya University, Kalady; Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Pookode; and Kerala Forest Research Institute, Peechi. mentioned earlier, suggests that some birds drift off from their normal course of migration, in the western Pacific, to cross the Indian Ocean during their spring migration. References On our return journey we photographed a Wedge-tailed BirdLife International. 2014. BirdLife International Species factsheet: Puffinus tenuirostris. Shearwater A. pacifica [27], which had been earlier recorded Website: http://www.birdlife.org/datazone/home. [Accessed on 10 June 2014.] from the seas off Kannur, in Kerala, in May 2011(Praveen et al. Giri, P., Dey, A., & Sen, S. K., 2013. Short-tailed Shearwater Ardenna tenuirostris from 2013). This is the second photographic record of this species Namkhana, West Bengal: A first record for India. Indian BIRDS 8 (5): 131. from India. Praveen J., Jayapal, R., Pittie, A., 2013. Notes on Indian rarities—1: Seabirds. Indian BIRDS 8 (5): 113–125.
    [Show full text]
  • Avian Diversity in Mizoram University Campus, Aizawl, Mizoram
    Science and Technology Journal, Vol. 7 Issue: 1 ISSN: 2321-3388 Avian Diversity in Mizoram University Campus, Aizawl, Mizoram Lalawmawia Sailo1, G.S. Solanki2* and C. Lalhruaizela3 1,2Department of Zoology, Mizoram University 3Department of Journalism & Mass Communication, Mizoram University E-mail: *[email protected] Abstract—We conducted an avian survey to assess the avian diversity of Mizoram University campus, Aizawl for a period of 24 months. During the study a total of 3,555 no of individuals of 189 species of birds belonging to 43 families were recorded. The family Muscicapidae represented the highest species composition with 28 species followed by family Timaliidae and of MZU campus and its adjacent area, 31 (16.4%) species are winter visitors, 15 (7.9%) species are summer visitor, and two species namely, Hooded pitta (Pitta sordid) and Forest wagtail (Dendronanthus indicus) are passer migrants. The variation calculated was 3.286 and species evenness index was 0.62. The detailed of avian fauna of campus recoded and the need of conservation actions are discussed in length. INTRODUCTION (Shankar Raman et al. 1998, Chettri et al. 2001, Shankar Raman, 2011) because they respond to habitat structure Mizoram falls within the northeast bio-geographical (MacArthur and MacArthur, 1961) and represent several zone and is a part of Indo-Mynmar biodiversity hotspot; trophic groups or guilds (Steele et al. 1984). Mizoram has a encompasses rich biodiversity. Several factors and variability within habitat such as topographical, climatic, Indo-Myanmar Hotspot region. Bird community plays an and forest category have contributed to avian species important role in forest ecosystem.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology and Conservation of the Cactus Ferruginous Pygmy-Owl in Arizona
    United States Department of Agriculture Ecology and Conservation Forest Service Rocky Mountain of the Cactus Ferruginous Research Station General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-43 Pygmy-Owl in Arizona January 2000 Abstract ____________________________________ Cartron, Jean-Luc E.; Finch, Deborah M., tech. eds. 2000. Ecology and conservation of the cactus ferruginous pygmy-owl in Arizona. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-43. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 68 p. This report is the result of a cooperative effort by the Rocky Mountain Research Station and the USDA Forest Service Region 3, with participation by the Arizona Game and Fish Department and the Bureau of Land Management. It assesses the state of knowledge related to the conservation status of the cactus ferruginous pygmy-owl in Arizona. The population decline of this owl has been attributed to the loss of riparian areas before and after the turn of the 20th century. Currently, the cactus ferruginous pygmy-owl is chiefly found in southern Arizona in xeroriparian vegetation and well- structured upland desertscrub. The primary threat to the remaining pygmy-owl population appears to be continued habitat loss due to residential development. Important information gaps exist and prevent a full understanding of the current population status of the owl and its conservation needs. Fort Collins Service Center Telephone (970) 498-1392 FAX (970) 498-1396 E-mail rschneider/[email protected] Web site http://www.fs.fed.us/rm Mailing Address Publications Distribution Rocky Mountain Research Station 240 W. Prospect Road Fort Collins, CO 80526-2098 Cover photo—Clockwise from top: photograph of fledgling in Arizona by Jean-Luc Cartron, photo- graph of adult ferruginous pygmy-owl in Arizona by Bob Miles, photograph of adult cactus ferruginous pygmy-owl in Texas by Glenn Proudfoot.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimations Relative to Birds of Prey in Captivity in the United States of America
    ESTIMATIONS RELATIVE TO BIRDS OF PREY IN CAPTIVITY IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA by Roger Thacker Department of Animal Laboratories The Ohio State University Columbus, Ohio 43210 Introduction. Counts relating to birds of prey in captivity have been accomplished in some European countries; how- ever, to the knowledge of this author no such information is available in the United States of America. The following paper consistsof data related to this subject collected during 1969-1970 from surveys carried out in many different direc- tions within this country. Methods. In an attempt to obtain as clear a picture as pos- sible, counts were divided into specific areas: Research, Zoo- logical, Falconry, and Pet Holders. It became obvious as the project advanced that in some casesthere was overlap from one area to another; an example of this being a falconer working with a bird both for falconry and research purposes. In some instances such as this, the author has used his own judgment in placing birds in specific categories; in other in- stances received information has been used for this purpose. It has also become clear during this project that a count of "pets" is very difficult to obtain. Lack of interest, non-coop- eration, or no available information from animal sales firms makes the task very difficult, as unfortunately, to obtain a clear dispersal picture it is from such sourcesthat informa- tion must be gleaned. However, data related to the importa- tion of birds' of prey as recorded by the Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife is included, and it is felt some observa- tions can be made from these figures.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Profile of Afghanistan
    NEPA Biodiversity Profile of Afghanistan An Output of the National Capacity Needs Self-Assessment for Global Environment Management (NCSA) for Afghanistan June 2008 United Nations Environment Programme Post-Conflict and Disaster Management Branch First published in Kabul in 2008 by the United Nations Environment Programme. Copyright © 2008, United Nations Environment Programme. This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. UNEP would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the United Nations Environment Programme. United Nations Environment Programme Darulaman Kabul, Afghanistan Tel: +93 (0)799 382 571 E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.unep.org DISCLAIMER The contents of this volume do not necessarily reflect the views of UNEP, or contributory organizations. The designations employed and the presentations do not imply the expressions of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP or contributory organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or its authority, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Unless otherwise credited, all the photos in this publication have been taken by the UNEP staff. Design and Layout: Rachel Dolores
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Distribution of the Elf Owl in California
    STATUS AND DISTRIBUTION OF THE ELF OWL IN CALIFORNIA MARY D. HALTERMAN, Department of BiologicalSciences, California State University,Chico, California95929 STEPHEN A. LAYMON, Departmentof Forestryand ResourceManagement, 145 Mulford Hall, Universityof California, Berkeley, California94720 MARY J. WHITFIELD, Department of BiologicalSciences, California State University,Chico, California95929 In California,the Elf Owl (Micrathenewhitneyi) has been found only in riparianhabitats and scatteredstands of Saguaro(Carnegiea gigantea) along the lower Colorado River and at a few desert oases (Grinnell and Miller 1944). Although the specieshas never been numerousin California, there hasapparently been a populationdecline. Surveys in 1978 and 1979 located 11 and 6 pairsof Elf Owls, respectively,at two locationsalong the lower Col- orado River (Cardiff1978, 1979). Cardiff's(1978) completerecord of the 28 Elf Owl sightingsmade in California prior to 1978 identified eight locations where the specieshas been found. We gathered10 additionalrecords made since 1979 (Table 1). All recent records were for either Soto Ranch or near Water Wheel Camp. Since 1979, habitatdestruction has continued, resulting in the loss of much of the remainingcottonwood-willow and mesquite bosques(C. Hunter and B. Andersonpers. comm.). This lossis due to the proliferationof tamarisk (Tamarix chinensis),agricultural clearing, bank stabilizationprojects, urbanization, and recentsustained flooding (Laymon and Halterman1987). This lossand itspotential effect on Elf Owlsprompted thissurvey
    [Show full text]
  • OWLS of OHIO C D G U I D E B O O K DIVISION of WILDLIFE Introduction O W L S O F O H I O
    OWLS OF OHIO c d g u i d e b o o k DIVISION OF WILDLIFE Introduction O W L S O F O H I O Owls have longowls evoked curiosity in In the winter of of 2002, a snowy ohio owl and stygian owl are known from one people, due to their secretive and often frequented an area near Wilmington and two Texas records, respectively. nocturnal habits, fierce predatory in Clinton County, and became quite Another, the Oriental scops-owl, is behavior, and interesting appearance. a celebrity. She was visited by scores of known from two Alaska records). On Many people might be surprised by people – many whom had never seen a global scale, there are 27 genera of how common owls are; it just takes a one of these Arctic visitors – and was owls in two families, comprising a total bit of knowledge and searching to find featured in many newspapers and TV of 215 species. them. The effort is worthwhile, as news shows. A massive invasion of In Ohio and abroad, there is great owls are among our most fascinating northern owls – boreal, great gray, and variation among owls. The largest birds, both to watch and to hear. Owls Northern hawk owl – into Minnesota species in the world is the great gray are also among our most charismatic during the winter of 2004-05 became owl of North America. It is nearly three birds, and reading about species with a major source of ecotourism for the feet long with a wingspan of almost 4 names like fearful owl, barking owl, North Star State.
    [Show full text]