The Australian Flatback by M. A. Cohen
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
4.1.4.1 Western Swamp Turtle Findings Factsheet V4
Science for Saving Species Research findings factsheet Project 4.1.4.1 Assisted colonisation trials for the western swamp turtle to cooler southern wetlands In brief This study is a world-first trial of and growth rates over six months that spanned a 350 km latitudinal assisted colonisation of a vertebrate to individuals released at an existing gradient, and focused more closely species in response to the threat northern translocation site. on post-release behaviour and of climate change. growth. Growth rates at the northern We found that growth rates at the and southern extremes of this The Critically Endangered western two southern sites were different – gradient were very similar between swamp turtle (Pseudemydura only at one of the southern sites the first and second trials, and it umbrina) naturally occurs in one did juveniles grow as much as they became clearer that factors limiting small, now isolated, ephemeral and did in the north. While the positive growth in the south included both seasonal clay swamp complex near result at one site was encouraging, lower environmental temperatures Perth, Western Australia. The species further trials over longer periods and food availability. We conclude relies on a wet winter and spring were needed, especially as the that assisted colonisation to southern period to eat, grow and reproduce south-west of Western Australia coastal regions of Western Australia within the wetlands, and is then was unusually cool throughout could be considered in the near dormant (in aestivation) when the the winter and spring of 2016. future, provided that release areas wetlands dry out. -
Flatback Turtles Along the Stunning Coastline of Western Australia
PPRROOJJEECCTT RREEPPOORRTT Expedition dates: 8 – 22 November 2010 Report published: October 2011 Beach combing for conservation: monitoring flatback turtles along the stunning coastline of Western Australia. 0 BEST BEST FOR TOP BEST WILDLIFE BEST IN ENVIRONMENT TOP HOLIDAY © Biosphere Expeditions VOLUNTEERING GREEN-MINDED RESPONSIBLE www.biosphereVOLUNTEERING-expeditions.orgSUSTAINABLE AWARD FOR NATURE ORGANISATION TRAVELLERS HOLIDAY HOLIDAY TRAVEL Germany Germany UK UK UK UK USA EXPEDITION REPORT Beach combing for conservation: monitoring flatback turtles along the stunning coastline of Western Australia. Expedition dates: 8 - 22 November 2010 Report published: October 2011 Authors: Glenn McFarlane Conservation Volunteers Australia Matthias Hammer (editor) Biosphere Expeditions This report is an adaptation of “Report of 2010 nesting activity for the flatback turtle (Natator depressus) at Eco Beach Wilderness Retreat, Western Australia” by Glenn McFarlane, ISBN: 978-0-9807857-3-9, © Conservation Volunteers. Glenn McFarlane’s report is reproduced with minor adaptations in the abstract and chapter 2; the remainder is Biosphere Expeditions’ work. All photographs in this report are Glenn McFarlane’s copyright unless otherwise stated. 1 © Biosphere Expeditions www.biosphere-expeditions.org Abstract The nesting population of Australian flatback (Natator depressus) sea turtles at Eco Beach, Western Australia, continues to be the focus of this annual programme, which resumes gathering valuable data on the species, dynamic changes to the nesting environment and a strong base for environmental teaching and training of all programme participants. Whilst the Eco Beach population is not as high in density as other Western Australian nesting populations at Cape Domett, Barrow Island or the Pilbara region, it remains significant for the following reasons: The 12 km nesting beach and survey area is free from human development, which can impact on nesting turtles and hatchlings. -
06-Executive Summary
Defining Turtle Diversity: Proceedings of a Workshop on Genetics, Ethics, and Taxonomy of Freshwater Turtles and Tortoises H. Bradley Shaffer, Nancy N. FitzSimmons, Arthur Georges, and Anders G.J. Rhodin, Eds. Chelonian Research Monographs 4:13–14 • © 2007 by Chelonian Research Foundation Defining Turtle Diversity: Proceedings of a Workshop on Genetics, Ethics, and Taxonomy of Freshwater Turtles and Tortoises EXECUTIVE SUMMARY H. BRADLEY SHAFFER, NANCY N. FITZSIMMONS, ARTHUR GEORGES, AND ANDERS G.J. RHODIN Genetic data, in combination with strong field studies, vidual paternity analysis to deep phylogenetics to identify- form one of the cornerstones of evolutionary, conservation, ing genes associated with unique phenotypes. Many of these and population biology. Turtles are particularly well suited newest tools are just being applied to turtles, and the possi- to benefit from the insights that genetics can bring to impor- bilities for asking and answering new questions are truly tant management issues. With only 313 currently recognized astonishing. As new genomic-level resources for turtles extant species worldwide, turtles are a manageable group become available, it should become both easier and less from a phylogenetic perspective, such that conservation and expensive to achieve these new research goals. The avail- management biologists are able to identify species com- ability of the first full genomic sequence for a turtle plexes that will benefit from additional genetic analyses. (Chrysemys picta, scheduled for delivery in 2008) will be a Additionally, field studies of threatened and endangered huge boost for this research agenda. turtles have identified conservation and management ques- The Turtle Taxonomy Working Group (TTWG) fo- tions needing genetic answers. -
15Th Annual Symposium on the Conservation and Biology of Tortoises and Freshwater Turtles
CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA 2017 15th Annual Symposium on the Conservation and Biology of Tortoises and Freshwater Turtles Joint Annual Meeting of the Turtle Survival Alliance and IUCN Tortoise & Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group Program and Abstracts August 7 - 9 2017 Charleston, SC Additional Conference Support Provided by: Kristin Berry, Herpetologiccal Review, John Iverson, Robert Krause,George Meyer, David Shapiro, Anders Rhodin, Brett and Nancy Stearns, and Reid Taylor Funding for the 2016 Behler Turtle Conservation Award Provided by: Brett and Nancy Stearns, Chelonian Research Foundation, Deb Behler, George Meyer, IUCN Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group, Leigh Ann and Matt Frankel and the Turtle Survival Alliance TSA PROJECTS TURTLE SURVIVAL ALLIANCE 2017 Conference Highlights In October 2016, the TSA opened the Keynote: Russell Mittermeier Tortoise Conservation Center in southern Madagascar that will provide long- Priorities and Opportunities in Biodiversity Conservation term care for the burgeoning number of tortoises seized from the illegal trade. Russell A. Mittermeier is The TSA manages over 7,800 Radiated Executive Vice Chair at Con- Tortoises in seven rescue facilities. servation International. He served as President of Conser- vation International from 1989 to 2014. Named a “Hero for the Planet” by TIME magazine, Mittermeier is regarded as a world leader in the field of biodiversity and tropical forest conservation. Trained as a primatologist and herpetologist, he has traveled widely in over 160 countries on seven continents, and has conducted field work in more than 30 − focusing particularly on Amazonia (especially Brazil The TSA-Myanmar team and our vet- and Suriname), the Atlantic forest region of Brazil, and Madagascar. -
TCF Summary Activity Report 2002–2018
Turtle Conservation Fund • Summary Activity Report 2002–2018 Turtle Conservation Fund A Partnership Coalition of Leading Turtle Conservation Organizations and Individuals Summary Activity Report 2002–2018 1 Turtle Conservation Fund • Summary Activity Report 2002–2018 Recommended Citation: Turtle Conservation Fund [Rhodin, A.G.J., Quinn, H.R., Goode, E.V., Hudson, R., Mittermeier, R.A., and van Dijk, P.P.]. 2019. Turtle Conservation Fund: A Partnership Coalition of Leading Turtle Conservation Organi- zations and Individuals—Summary Activity Report 2002–2018. Lunenburg, MA and Ojai, CA: Chelonian Research Foundation and Turtle Conservancy, 54 pp. Front Cover Photo: Radiated Tortoise, Astrochelys radiata, Cap Sainte Marie Special Reserve, southern Madagascar. Photo by Anders G.J. Rhodin. Back Cover Photo: Yangtze Giant Softshell Turtle, Rafetus swinhoei, Dong Mo Lake, Hanoi, Vietnam. Photo by Timothy E.M. McCormack. Printed by Inkspot Press, Bennington, VT 05201 USA. Hardcopy available from Chelonian Research Foundation, 564 Chittenden Dr., Arlington, VT 05250 USA. Downloadable pdf copy available at www.turtleconservationfund.org 2 Turtle Conservation Fund • Summary Activity Report 2002–2018 Turtle Conservation Fund A Partnership Coalition of Leading Turtle Conservation Organizations and Individuals Summary Activity Report 2002–2018 by Anders G.J. Rhodin, Hugh R. Quinn, Eric V. Goode, Rick Hudson, Russell A. Mittermeier, and Peter Paul van Dijk Strategic Action Planning and Funding Support for Conservation of Threatened Tortoises and Freshwater -
Western Swamp Tortoise Pseudemydura Umbrina
Western Swamp Tortoise Pseudemydura umbrina Conservation Status: Critically Endangered Identification The western swamp tortoise Pseudomydura umbrina is Australia’s rarest reptile, found only in a small number of swamps near Perth in Western Australia. It is also notable as the smallest species belonging to the Australian Chelidae family of aquatic or semi-aquatic turtles. It is a short-necked, freshwater tortoise with a squarish shell that is brown above and white, yellow or olive-brown below. The neck is covered in tuberacles (knobbles). It has webbed toes with five claws on each foot. Females are smaller than males, and can be distinguished by the shape of the plastron (belly of shell) and the length of the tail. The western swamp tortoise is readily distinguished from other freshwater tortoises in south-west Western Australia Photos: Gerald Kuchling/DBCA by its short neck. Carapace (Shell) Length: maximum 15.5cm (males), 13.5cm (females), 2.4-2.9cm (hatchlings) Weight: maximum 550g (males), 410g (females), 3.2-6.6g (hatchlings) Taxonomy Family: Chelidae Genus: Pseudemydura Species: umbrina Other common names: western swamp turtle, short-necked tortoise, Yarkiny Distribution and Habitat The western swamp tortoise was thought to have been extinct for over 100 years prior to its rediscovery in 1953. Little is known about the species distribution prior to its rediscovery, but its possible former distribution was in ephemeral swamps on the clay soils of the Swan Coastal Plain between Mogumber in the north to Donnybrook in the south. Currently there are only two known wild populations near Perth, with two successfully translocated populations approximately 80km further north. -
Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual Symposium on Sea Turtle Biology and Conservation
NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFSC-602 PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-EIGHTH ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM ON SEA TURTLE BIOLOGY AND CONSERVATION 22 to 26 January 2008 Loreto, Baja California Sur, México Compiled by: Kama Dean & Melania C. López Castro U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service Southeast Fisheries Science Center 75 Virginia Beach Drive Miami, Florida 33149 March 2010 NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFSC-602 PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-EIGHTH ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM ON SEA TURTLE BIOLOGY AND CONSERVATION 22 to 26 January 2008 Loreto, Baja California Sur, México Compiled by: Kama Dean & Melania C. López Castro U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Gary Locke, Secretary NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION Dr. Jane Lubchenco, Under Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE Eric C. Schwaab, Assistant Administrator for Fisheries March 2010 This Technical Memorandum series is used for documentation and timely communication of preliminary results, interim reports, or similar special-purpose information. Although the memoranda are not subject to complete formal review, editorial control or detailed editing, they are expected to reflect sound professional work. NOTICE The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) does not approve, recommend or endorse any proprietary product or material mentioned in this publication. No references shall be made to NMFS, or to this publication furnished by NMFS, in any advertising or sales promotion which would imply that NMFS approves, recommends or endorses any proprietary product or proprietary material herein which has as its purpose any intent to cause directly or indirectly the advertised product to be use or purchased because of NMFS publication. -
Genetics and Molecular Biology, 43, 4, E20200213 (2020) Copyright © Sociedade Brasileira De Genética
Genetics and Molecular Biology, 43, 4, e20200213 (2020) Copyright © Sociedade Brasileira de Genética. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2020-0213 Research Article Animal Genetics Heterochromatin and microsatellites detection in karyotypes of four sea turtle species: Interspecific chromosomal differences Caroline Regina Dias Machado1, Camila Domit2, Marcela Baer Pucci3, Camilla Borges Gazolla1, Larissa Glugoski4, Viviane Nogaroto5 and Marcelo Ricardo Vicari1,5 1Universidade Federal do Paraná, Centro Politécnico, Departamento de Genética, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Genética, Curitiba, Ponta Grossa, PR, Brazil. 2Universidade Federal do Paraná, Laboratório de Ecologia e Conservação, Pontal do Paraná, PR, Brazil. 3Universidade Nove de Julho, Departamento de Saúde II, Bauru, SP, Brazil. 4Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Genética Evolutiva e Biologia Molecular, São Carlos, SP, Brazil. 5Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa, Departamento de Biologia Estrutural, Molecular e Genética, Ponta Grossa, PR, Brazil. Abstract The wide variation in size and content of eukaryotic genomes is mainly attributed to the accumulation of repetitive DNA sequences, like microsatellites, which are tandemly repeated DNA sequences. Sea turtles share a diploid number (2n) of 56, however recent molecular cytogenetic data have shown that karyotype conservatism is not a rule in the group. In this study, the heterochromatin distribution and the chromosomal location of microsatellites (CA)n, (GA)n, (CAG)n, (GATA)n, (GAA)n, (CGC)n and (GACA)n in Chelonia mydas, Caretta caretta, Eretmochelys imbricata and Lepidochelys olivacea were comparatively investigated. The obtained data showed that just the (CA)n, (GA)n, (CAG)n and (GATA)n microsatellites were located on sea turtle chromosomes, preferentially in heterochromatic regions of the microchromosomes (mc). -
Reproductive Biology of the Flatback Turtle Natator Depressus in Western Australia
Vol. 23: 115–123, 2014 ENDANGERED SPECIES RESEARCH Published online February 28 doi: 10.3354/esr00569 Endang Species Res FREEREE ACCESSCCESS Reproductive biology of the flatback turtle Natator depressus in Western Australia Kellie L. Pendoley*, Catherine D. Bell, Rebecca McCracken, Kirsten R. Ball, Jarrad Sherborne, Jessica E. Oates, Patrick Becker, Anna Vitenbergs, Paul A. Whittock Pendoley Environmental Pty Ltd, 2/1 Aldous Place, Booragoon, WA 6154, Australia ABSTRACT: In contrast to the circumglobal nesting distributions and well-described reproductive biology of most marine turtle species, all known records of flatback turtle Natator depressus nest- ing have occurred within Australia and are relatively underreported; the species is listed as ‘Data Deficient’ by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN). We report important baseline data on the breeding biology of flatback turtles at 3 rookeries in the Pilbara region of Western Australia, an area subject to increasing coastal development due to rapid expansion of the resources sector. Barrow Island and Mundabullangana support substantial reproductive pop- ulations; over the 6 season sampling period from 2005/06 to 2010/11, ~4000 and ~3500 turtles were tagged at each location, respectively. Over 2 seasons of monitoring in 2009/10 and 2011/12 at Cemetery Beach, a smaller rookery in Port Hedland, ~350 flatback turtles were tagged. We detected variation in parameters of reproductive biology between island and mainland rookeries. Mean remigration interval at Barrow Island (1.9 yr) was significantly shorter than at mainland Mundabullangana (2.2 yr) and may reflect differences in location and characteristics of remote foraging habitats in turtles returning to mainland versus offshore rookeries. -
Flatback Sea Turtle (Natator Depressus) Eggs by Varanid Lizards in Northern Australia
Chekntitu Contemiliut tiltd Biolog)', 2003. l(31:557-5r O 2003 by Chelonian Research Foundation Influence of Nest Site Selection on Predation of Flatback Sea Turtle (Natator depressus) Eggs by Varanid Lizards in Northern Australia Snan J. Br,Arunnsr, Mrcnlnl L. GunvnazrAND RoBEnr I.T. PnrNcn3 tHeydon-l,aurence Building A08, School of Biological Science, Universi^, of Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Austalia I E-mail : s _blamires@ hotmail.cottt] ; 2 F ac ulty of S c i e nc e, I nfo rmat i on Te c hno I o gt' and Educ at i on, Northern Territory Universiq', Darwin, Northern Tenitom 0909, Australia I E-mail : michael. guine a@ ntu. e du. au ] : tDepartment of Conservation and Land Management, Wildlife Research Cente, P.O. Box 51, Wanneroo, Western Austalia 6946, Australia I E-mail : bobp @ c alm.wa. gov. au ] Ansrnlcr. - We examined nest site selection of flatback sea turtles (Natator depressrs) at two sites: Fog Bay, Northern Territory, and Mundabullangana, Western Australia. Nesting at Fog Bay occurred predominantly at the dune base. The dunes at Fog Bay are tall and steep, while the dune slopes at Mundabullangana are less severe and their crests are more accessible. Apart from afternoon nesting at Mundabullangana, N. depressus nesting procedure was similar at both sites: nesting around high tide, with reasonably direct crawls up the beach and the choice of nesting site unaffected by turtle size. At Fog Bay attempts to climb the dune usually resulted in no nesting and gradient of the dunes appeared to confine nesting to the dune base. -
IUCN TORTOISE and FRESHWATER TURTLE SPECIALIST GROUP NEWSLETTER Issue Number 2
IUCN TORTOISE AND FRESHWATER TURTLE SPECIALIST GROUP NEWSLETTER Issue Number 2 Group CO-Chairmen: Peter C. H. Pritchard - Ian Swingland Editor for Issue 2: Edward O. Moll December 1987 Editorial Much of what we do to conserve chelonians today is based on what is practical and/or what seems logical. In truth .. there H are few -tried ana proven methods for rebuilding depleted chelonian populations. Many of our methods are used because they are traditional. For example we establish hatche~~es because sea turtle workers have hatcheries, etc. In 1983 Nicholas Mrosovsky wrote a controversial booklet entitled Conserving Sea Turtles in which he raised many questions concerning the traditional methods. It is quite possible that much of what we have done in the past has been worthless or even worse may have exacerbated the problem (eg. widespread adoption of styrofoam boxes for incubation). A solution to the problem of determining which techniques work and which do not is to monitor the success .(or lack of success) of .ongoing programs. The problem with the solution is few programs have been in existence for long enough periods to produce any definite results. The turtles with which we are concerned are typically slow maturing animals. Any seeds of conservation sewn for such beasts may require years/decades to germinate and grow. One of the longest running conservation programs for a freshwater turtle is the river terrapin program on the Perak River of Malaysia. This program, begun by Mohamed Khan (now Director General of the Dept. of Wildlife and National Parks) in 1967, presently includes a hatchery along with facilities fer headstarting and captive breeding. -
Dermatemys Mawii , Bajo Condiciones De Cautiverio
El Colegio de la Frontera Sur Manejo, salud y dieta en tortuga blanca, Dermatemys mawii , bajo condiciones de cautiverio TESIS presentada como requisito parcial para optar al grado de Doctorado en Ciencias en Ecología y Desarrollo Sustentable por Judith Andrea Rangel Mendoza 2014 A mi hijo, Marco Julián, que llegó a mi vida durante el proceso de estudios de este doctorado Mi grado de madre, te amo! AGRADECIMIENTOS A El Colegio de la Frontera Sur (ECOSUR), que volvió a apoyarme en mis metas de crecimiento personal y profesional al brindarme la posibilidad de realizar mis estudios de doctorado. Con especial agradecimiento hacia al área de posgrado de las Unidades Campeche y Villahermosa del ECOSUR. A mi tutor, Manuel Weber Rodríguez, por su compromiso, su enseñanza y amistad. A los miembros de consejo tutelar: David González Solís, Gerardo Suzán y Carlos Alfonso Álvarez González, por su asesoría y acompañamiento durante este proceso de formación. Especial gratitud a Alfonso por la acogida en su laboratorio de Bioquímica, la financiación de los estudios de bioquímica digestiva y el estímulo constante a continuar y pensar más allá. A los evaluadores de mi protocolo de tesis, todos los miembros de mi consejo tutelar y como externos al Eduardo Jorge Naranjo Piñera, Amaury Cordero Tapia y Ramón Isaac Rojas González. A los evaluadores de mi examen predoctoral: Mircea Hidalgo Mihart, León David Olivera, David González Solis y Manuel Mendoza Carranza. A los sinodales en mi examen de titulación, mi consejo tutelar en compañía de Eduardo Naranjo, Rogelio Cedeño Vázquez y Claudia Elena Zenteno Ruiz. Al Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT), quien brindó una beca de manutención y salud, a través de ISSSTE, durante cuatro años de estudios.