DOCSLIB.ORG

VBDO Responsible Supply Chain Benchmark 2011 - a Comparative Investigation Into CSR in the Supply Chain of 40 Multinationals

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
VBDO Responsible Supply Chain Benchmark 2011 - a Comparative Investigation Into CSR in the Supply Chain of 40 Multinationals VBDO Responsible Supply Chain Benchmark 2011 - a comparative investigation into CSR in the supply chain of 40 multinationals - Stefan Janssen MSc Robert Zwiers MSc Amara Goeree BSc December 14th, 2011 Vereniging van Beleggers voor Duurzame Ontwikkeling (Association of Investors for Sustainable Development) Pieterstraat 11 3512 JT Utrecht (t) +31 (0) 30 234 0031 [email protected] www.vbdo.nl www.duurzaamaandeel.nl - VBDO Responsible Supply Chain Management Benchmark 2011 - Foreword VBDO................................................................................................................. 4 Executive Summary............................................................................................................ 5 1. Introduction.................................................................................................................. 8 1.1. Mission and vision of the VBDO ......................................................................... 8 1.2. Vision on Corporate Responsibility...................................................................... 8 1.3. Vision on Responsible Supply Chain Management.............................................. 9 1.4. Key theme: Human Rights - “Protect, Respect and Remedy”............................ 10 1.5. Key theme: Scarcity and volatility of commodity markets ................................ 14 2. Method ....................................................................................................................... 16 2.1. The benchmark methodology ............................................................................. 16 2.2. Basic principles and demarcation ....................................................................... 17 2.2.1. Basic principles............................................................................................ 17 2.2.2. Demarcation................................................................................................. 18 2.3. Benchmark indicators ......................................................................................... 19 2.4. Qualitative and quantitative assessment ............................................................. 20 2.5. The role of the jury and the Award..................................................................... 20 2.6. Best Practices...................................................................................................... 20 3. Results – Company performance............................................................................... 22 3.1. ‘Foods’ ................................................................................................................ 22 3.1.1. Royal Ahold................................................................................................. 23 3.1.2. Heineken ...................................................................................................... 24 3.1.3. Unilever........................................................................................................ 25 3.1.4. CSM ............................................................................................................. 26 3.1.5. Royal Wessanen........................................................................................... 27 3.1.6. Sligro Food Group ....................................................................................... 28 3.1.7. Nutreco......................................................................................................... 28 3.2. ‘Electronics’........................................................................................................ 29 3.2.1. ASML .......................................................................................................... 30 3.2.2. Royal Philips................................................................................................ 31 3.2.3. TomTom ...................................................................................................... 32 3.2.4. ASM International ....................................................................................... 33 3.2.5. Royal KPN................................................................................................... 33 3.3. ‘Construction’ ..................................................................................................... 34 3.3.1. Wavin........................................................................................................... 35 3.3.2. Ballast Nedam.............................................................................................. 36 3.3.3. Royal BAM Group....................................................................................... 37 3.3.4. Heijmans ...................................................................................................... 38 3.3.5. Imtech .......................................................................................................... 39 3.4. ‘Chemicals & Industry’....................................................................................... 40 3.4.1. Royal DSM .................................................................................................. 41 3.4.2. AkzoNobel ................................................................................................... 42 3.4.3. ArcelorMittal................................................................................................ 43 3.4.4. Royal Vopak ................................................................................................ 44 3.4.5. Royal Ten Cate ............................................................................................ 44 3.4.6. Aperam......................................................................................................... 45 2 - VBDO Responsible Supply Chain Management Benchmark 2011 - 3.4.7. Crown van Gelder........................................................................................ 46 3.4.8. Aalberts Industries ....................................................................................... 47 3.5. ‘Mining’ .............................................................................................................. 47 3.5.1. Fugro............................................................................................................ 48 3.5.2. Royal Boskalis Westminster........................................................................ 49 3.5.3. SBM Offshore.............................................................................................. 49 3.5.4. Royal Dutch Shell........................................................................................ 50 3.5.5. AMG ............................................................................................................ 51 3.6. ‘Media’................................................................................................................ 51 3.6.1. Reed Elsevier ............................................................................................... 52 3.6.2. Telegraaf Media Group................................................................................ 53 3.6.3. Wolters Kluwer............................................................................................ 54 3.7. The ‘Others’........................................................................................................ 55 3.7.1. TNT Express ................................................................................................ 56 3.7.2. PostNL ......................................................................................................... 57 3.7.3. Air France-KLM .......................................................................................... 58 3.7.4. Mediq ........................................................................................................... 59 3.7.5. Pharming...................................................................................................... 59 3.7.6. Macintosh Retail Group............................................................................... 60 3.7.7. Accell Group................................................................................................ 60 4. Ranking and Analysis ................................................................................................ 62 4.1. Ranking............................................................................................................... 62 4.2. Analysis............................................................................................................... 63 5. Summary and conclusions ......................................................................................... 66 6. Appendixes ................................................................................................................ 68 6.1. Appendix 1: Benchmark Criteria........................................................................ 68 6.2. Appendix 2: Criteria scores (per ‘sector’) .......................................................... 76 3 - VBDO Responsible Supply Chain Management Benchmark 2011 - FOREWORD VBDO When engaging with companies, the following questions often pop up. “Why should we make our processes more sustainable?” “How can a company address international issues?” “What does the concept of human rights exactly imply, notably from our Western perspective?” “How can we find the solutions to make our products ready to deal with future challenges and give our company a competitive edge?” Supply chain management has
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Remuneration Report
    REMUNERATION REPORT The first part of this report outlines the remuneration policy REMUNERATION POLICY for the Board of Management as it has been adopted over The main objective of Fugro’s remuneration policy is to time, while the second part contains details of the attract, motivate and retain qualified management that is remuneration in 2015 of the members of the Board of needed for a global company of the size and complexity of Management and of the Supervisory Board. Fugro. The members of the Board of Management are More information on remuneration and on option and share rewarded accordingly. Variable remuneration is an important ownership of members of the Board of Management is part of the total package. The remuneration policy aims at available in note 5.64.2 of the financial statements in this compensation in line with the median of the labour market annual report. This remuneration report is also available reference group. The current remuneration policy was on Fugro’s website. adopted by the AGM on 6 May 2014 and took effect retroactively as from 1 January 2014. As mentioned above, This report has been prepared by the remuneration the policy was amended in the AGM on 30 April 2015. Within committee of the Supervisory Board. The main function of the framework of the remuneration policy, compensation for this committee is to prepare the decision-making of the the Board of Management is determined by the Supervisory Supervisory Board regarding the remuneration policy for the Board on the advice of the remuneration committee. Board of Management and the application of this policy to the remuneration of the individual members of the Board of Labour market reference group Management.
    [Show full text]
  • 1994 Foundation of Nutreco
    ‘11 CONTENTS CONTENTS Overview Operations and and strategy 2 business performance 32 OVERVIEW AND STRATEGY OPERATIONAL DEVELOPMENTS Our track record and ambitions 2 Premix and Feed Specialties 34 Statement by the Chief Executive Officer 4 Fish Feed 36 Profile & financial highlights 6 Animal Nutrition Canada 38 Key figures 8 Compound Feed Europe 40 Report of the Executive Board 10 Meat and Other 42 Operating result 13 Strategic agenda 2012 14 Innovation 46 Strategy 17 Sustainability 56 Strategic objectives and highlights 24 Human Resources 60 Information about the Nutreco share 27 OPERATIONS GOVERNANCE OVERVIEW AND AND BUSINESS AND FINANCIAL STRATEGY PERFORMANCE COMPLIANCE STATEMENTS 1 Governance Financial and compliance 64 statements 91 Risk management 64 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Management review and reporting 73 Corporate governance 74 Consolidated financial statements 92 Remuneration Report 79 Notes to the consolidated financial statements 98 Report of the Supervisory Board 85 Company’s financial statements 182 Notes to the company’s financial statements 183 Other information 185 Independent auditor’s report 186 Ten years of Nutreco 188 ADDENDUM Executive Board 190 Supervisory Board 191 Business Management & corporate staff 193 Participations of Nutreco N.V. 194 2 OUR TRACK RECORD AND AMBITIONS Our track record and ambitions AquaVision and Agri Vision Annual international conference organised by Nutreco since 1996, Sustainability bringing multiple stakeholders together • First Sustainability Report in 2000. at a professional, non-political forum to • Establishment of Innovation and discuss challenges and opportunities Sustainability Committee in in agriculture and aquaculture. About Supervisory Board in 2009 and 5,000 delegates have attended. performance targets on sustainability for top management since 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report Capturing Growth, Delivering Value How to Read This Report
    Annual Report Capturing growth, delivering value How to read this report Management summary Readers looking for the highlights of 2020 are advised to read chapter 1 until 6, and the first pages of chapter 7 until 10. Report of the Board of Management The report of the Board of Management consists of the following sections: • Introduction • Business Report • Governance, chapter 16 until 19 Forward-looking statements This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements. Readers should not put undue reliance on these statements. These provide a snapshot on the publication date of this report. In addition, future actual events, results and outcomes likely differ from these statements made. Chapter ‘Non-financial statements’, section ‘Safeguarding report quality’ provides more information on forward-looking statements. Contents 8 Message from Herna Verhagen 24 How we create value 30 Our strategy 72 Financial value Introduction Governance 1 At a glance 4 12 Board of Management 92 2 Message from Herna Verhagen 8 13 Supervisory Board 94 3 Our operating context 12 14 Report of the Supervisory Board 96 4 Impact of Covid-19 20 15 Remuneration report 102 16 Corporate governance 110 17 Our tax policy and principles 120 Business Report 18 PostNL on the capital markets 122 5 How we create value 24 19 Statements of the Board of Management 126 6 Our strategy 30 7 Customer value 40 8 Social value 54 Performance statements 9 Environmental value 64 20 Financial statements 129 10 Financial value 72 21 Non-financial statements 213 11 Risk and opportunity
    [Show full text]
  • Dorien Fransens, Secretary General, Europeanissuers
    5+ aitbl - ivzw RucBelliard 4 6 Tel| +32(012 289 25 70 info@europeafi issuers,eu 8-1040BRUSSEIs Fax:+32 (0)2 512 l5 60 wM/w.€uropeanitsuers,eu U.S.Securftles and Exchange Commission Tothe att. of Ms.Nancv M. Morris Secretary1.00 F Street, NE washington,D.c. 20549-9303 U5A r.iFcH!l/HD MAY13 2008 Brussels,8 May 2008 Re: Commentson ProposedAmendments to RulesRelating to ForeignPrivate lssuer Reportingunder the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 FileNo. 57-05-08 DearMs. Morris, We are submittingthis letter in responseto the requestof the Securitiesand Exchange Commission(the "Commission") for commentson the Commission'sproposal to amendthe rulesand forms that governreporting by foreignprivate issuers under the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934,as amended(the "ExchangeAct"). The proposalis discussedin ReleaseNo. 33-8900; 34-57409i International series Release No. 1308; File No. 57-05-08 (the "Release"), Europeanlssuers'has for severalyears supported the effortsof the Commissionto review the applicationof the U.S.securities laws and regulations to non-U.S.issuers. These efforts haveresulted in substantialimprovements to the U.S.regulatory regime in the pastfew years,including the modernizationof the rulesgoverning deregistration and the elimination of U.S.GAAP reconciliation for companiesthat publishIFRS financialstatements. Unfortunately,we cannotsupport the Commission'sproposal to requirelarge non-U.S. issuersto file their annualreports on Form20-F within 90 daysof the end of their fiscal years. We regardthis proposalas a step in the oppositedirection compared to the I Europeanlssuersis a pan Europeanorganisation that representsthe vast majority of publicly quoted companiesin Europe. Europeanlssuerswas formed when EALIq the EuropeanAssociation of Listed Companies,and UNIQUE, the Unionof lssuersQuoted in Europe,combined their organisations in early 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hague, April 2009 Dsec\2009\Minutes\Ava\Ava 2009 2
    Minutes of the General Meeting of Shareholders of Wereldhave N.V., held on Thursday 2 April 2009 at 11:00 a.m. in the Kurhaus Hotel in Scheveningen (Municipality of The Hague, the Netherlands) Opening Mr C.J. de Swart , Chairman of the Supervisory Board, opened the Meeting at 11:00 a.m. and welcomed all those present. He noted that the Meeting had been convened in accordance with the statutory requirements and the requirements of the Articles of Association, by means of notices in the editions of De Telegraaf, Het Algemeen Dagblad (The Hague edition) and De Officiële Prijscourant of Euronext Amsterdam and in France in La Tribune and Les Echos, all on 12 March 2009. Issues verifying the inclusion of the notices are held by the Secretary for inspection. Documents to be discussed in this Meeting were submitted in the prescribed manner; according to the attendance list, ordinary shareholders present are entitled to 7,357,901 votes, preference shareholders present are entitled to 1,438,433 votes and priority shareholders present are entitled to 11 votes. Those shareholders who were unable to attend the meeting were given the option of granting a voting proxy to the civil-law notary, Mr. R.J. Lijdsman via the internet. In total, holders of 836,596 ordinary shares availed of the option of submitting their votes via the internet, which represents 13% of the present ordinary share capital, entitled to 921,361 votes. Mr De Swart raised for discussion Agenda Item 2 The Minutes of the General Meeting of Shareholders on 27 March 2008 The minutes of the Meeting held on 27 March 2008 were published via Wereldhave's website within a month after the Meeting and were sent upon request at no cost.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Reporting As a Driver for Integrated Thinking?
    Integrated Reporting as a driver for Integrated Thinking? Maturity of <IR> in the Netherlands 2015 Contributors Patrick Seinstra Jennifer Muller Royal BAM Group: Barry Oesman Partner Integrated & Sustainability Deloitte Audit Master Student at London School of Economics and Group Controller Political Science Anneke Sipkens DSM: Kimberley Chan Director Sustainability Deloitte Risk Services Michiel van der Valk Sustainability Manager Master Student Sustainable Business & Innovation at Udeke Huiskamp Utrecht University Nutreco: Jose Villalon Senior Manager Sustainability Deloitte Risk Services Corporate Sustainability Director CSR the Netherlands (MVO Nederland) Erica Kostense-Smit Willem Lageweg Nutreco: Sigrid van Amerongen Manager Sustainability Deloitte Risk Services CEO CSR The Netherlands (MVO Nederland) CSR Manager Ashley Myers Vincent van Marle Heineken International: Jan-Willem Vosmeer Manager Sustainability Deloitte Risk Services Manager CSR Manager Frank Geelen Interviewees Delta Lloyd: David Hoppe Partner CFO Services & Finance Transformation NS: Carola Wijdoogen Communications Advisor Deloitte Consulting Director Sustainable Business Ministry of Economic Affairs: Martin Lok Marco van der Vegte KPN: Hans Koeleman Program Manager Natural Capital Managing Partner Audit and Member Executive Board Director Corporate Communications & CSR Deloitte Holding Avans Hogeschool: Marleen Janssen Groesbeek KPN: Brechtje Spoorenberg Professor Sustainable Finance and Accounting Olivier van Thuijl Manager CSR Senior Manager CFO Services Deloitte
    [Show full text]
  • VBDO Responsible Supply Chain Benchmark 2012
    VBDO Responsible Supply Chain Benchmark 2012 a comparative investigation into CSR in the supply chain of 40 multinationals Pieterstraat 11 3512 JT Utrecht T +31 (0) 30 234 00 31 [email protected] www.vbdo.nl VBDO Responsible Supply Chain Benchmark 2012 a comparative investigation into CSR in the supply chain of 40 multinationals A research paper by VBDO (Dutch Association of Investors for Sustainable Development) VBDO: Chris Bres Philip Cotterell Rukiye Kaya Saskia Verbunt November 2012 This report has been made possible by ICCO. The contents, conclusions and recommendations are, however, the sole responsibility of the VBDO. © VBDO report by the Dutch Association of Investors for Sustainable Development (Vereniging van Beleggers voor Duurzame Ontwikkeling) Disclaimer VBDO will assume no responsibility or legal liability for incorrect or misleading information provided by the sources used for this report. THE DUTCH A SSOCIATION OF INVESTO2RS FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT 2 Contents Foreword 5 Executive Summary 6 Chapter 1 Introduction 8 1.1 Mission and vision of the VBDO 8 1.2 Vision on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) 8 1.3 Vision on Responsible Supply Chain Management (RSCM) 10 Chapter 2 Method 12 2.1 Introduction to the method 12 2.2 Basic principles and demarcation 13 2.2.1 Basic principles 13 2.2.2 Demarcation 13 2.3 Benchmark indicators 14 2.4 Modifications in the benchmark criteria 2012 16 2.5 Scoring in practice 17 2.6 Role of the jury and the Award 18 Chapter 3 Results - Company Performance 19 3.1 Chemicals 19 AkzoNobel 19 DSM 20
    [Show full text]
  • Transparency Benchmark 2015 the Crystal 2015 in Cooperation with The
    Transparency Benchmark 2015 The Crystal 2015 In cooperation with the Netherlands Institute of Chartered Accountants (NBA) Transparency Benchmark 2015 The Crystal 2015 In cooperation with the Netherlands Institute of Chartered Accountants (NBA) Transparency Benchmark 2015 The Crystal 2015 1 1 The Transparency Benchmark Ladder The Transparency Benchmark Ladder provides an overview of the total scores of the participating organizations, including the sub scores concerning 8 different criteria categories. The organizations that are included in the Transparency Benchmark are ranked in different groups: Frontrunners, Followers, Peloton, Laggards and organizations with zero scores Category transparancy ladder 2015 Ranking Positions Leaders 1 - 20 Followers 21 - 70 Peloton 71 - 213 Laggards 214 - 245 Organisations with zero scores 246 - 461 2 Transparency Benchmark 2015 The Crystal 2015 The Transparency Benchmark Ladder Organisation Pos. Cat. Total score AKZO Nobel N.V. | ¥¥¦ ¦¯« Koninklijke Philips N.V. | ¥¥§ ¦¯ª Unilever N.V. | ¥¥¨ ¦¯© NS | ¥¥© ¦¯© Royal BAM Group | ¥¥ª ¦¯¨ KPN | ¥¥« ¦¯§ Schiphol Group | ¥¥¬ ¦¯¦ Havenbedrijf Roerdam N.V. | ¥¥® ¦¯¦ LEADERS Alliander N.V. | ¥¥¯ ¦®¯ Siemens Nederland | ¥¦¥ ¦®¯ Vodafone | ¥¦¦ ¦®« Aegon N.V. | ¥¦§ ¦®ª Heineken N.V. | ¥¦¨ ¦®§ ING Groep | ¥¦© ¦®¦ Nederlandse Gasunie N.V. | ¥¦ª ¦®¦ Van Lanschot Bankiers | ¥¦« ¦®¥ DSM N.V. | ¥¦¬ ¦¬¯ Bank Ned. Gemeenten N.V. | ¥¦® ¦¬¯ PostNL | ¥¦¯ ¦¬¬ Vitens N.V. | ¥§¥ ¦¬¬ ANWB B.V. | ¥§¦ ¦¬« Achmea | ¥§§ ¦¬© De Nederlandsche Bank N.V. | ¥§§ ¦¬© Ernst & Young Nederland | ¥§§ ¦¬© TenneT Holding B.V. | ¥§§ ¦¬© Heijmans | ¥§« ¦¬¨ SNS Bank N.V. | ¥§¬ ¦¬§ ABN AMRO Group N.V. | ¥§® ¦¬¦ Koninklijke Ten Cate N.V. | ¥§® ¦¬¦ NV NOM Investerings- en Ontwikkelingsmaatschappij voor Noord-Nederland | ¥§® ¦¬¦ MN | ¥¨¦ ¦¬¥ Nederlandse Waterschapsbank NV | ¥¨¦ ¦¬¥ Q Park N.V. | ¥¨¦ ¦¬¥ Rabobank | ¥¨© ¦«¯ Koninklijke Ahold N.V. | ¥¨ª ¦«® Royal Imtech N.V. | ¥¨ª FOLLOWERS ¦«® Holding Nationale Goede Doelen Loterijen N.V. | ¥¨¬ ¦«¬ Kendrion N.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Historyeurex14e 08-03-28 Dezimalerweiterung
    Contract Specifications for Futures Contracts and Eurex14 Options Contracts at Eurex Deutschland and Stand March 278, 2008 Eurex Zürich Seite 1 [….] Annex A in relation to subsection 1.6 of the contract specifications: Futures on Shares of Produkt- Group Cash Contract Minimum Price Currency ID ID** Market- Size Change* ID** AEGON N.V. AENF NL01 XAMS 100 0.00010.01 EUR Koninklijke Ahold N.V. AHOG NL01 XAMS 100 0.00010.01 EUR Akzo Nobel N.V. AKUF NL01 XAMS 100 0.00010.01 EUR ASML Holding N.V. ASMG NL01 XAMS 100 0.00010.01 EUR Koninklijke BAM Groep N.V. BGPF NL01 XAMS 100 0.00010.01 EUR Corporate Express N.V. BUHF NL01 XAMS 100 0.00010.01 EUR Corio N.V. CL6F NL01 XAMS 50 0.0010.01 EUR CSM N.V. CSMF NL01 XAMS 50 0.0010.01 EUR Koninklijke BAM Groep N.V. DSMF NL01 XAMS 100 0.00010.01 EUR Reed Elsevier ELVF NL01 XAMS 100 0.0010.01 EUR Reed Elsevier N.V. ELVG NL01 XAMS 100 0.00010.01 EUR Fortis N.V. FO4G NL01 XAMS 100 0.00010.01 EUR Fugro N.V. FUGF NL01 XAMS 100 0.0010.01 EUR Heineken Holding N.V. HEHF NL01 XAMS 100 0.00010.01 EUR Hagemeyer N.V. HMYF NL01 XAMS 100 0.00010.01 EUR Heineken N.V. HNKF NL01 XAMS 100 0.00010.01 EUR SBM Offshore N.V. IHCG NL01 XAMS 100 0.00010.01 EUR ING Groep N.V. INNF NL01 XAMS 100 0.00010.01 EUR Koninklijke KPN N.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Contracts and Eurex14e Options Contracts at Eurex Deutschland and Eurex Zürich As of 22.01.2018 Page 1
    Contract Specifications for Futures Contracts and Eurex14e Options Contracts at Eurex Deutschland and Eurex Zürich As of 22.01.2018 Page 1 ********************************************************************************** AMENDMENTS ARE MARKED AS FOLLOWS: INSERTIONS ARE UNDERLINED DELETIONS ARE CROSSED OUT ********************************************************************************** 1. Part: Contract Specifications for Futures Contracts […] 2. Subpart: Contract Specifications for Index Options […] 2.6.11 Price Gradations The price of a stock option or LEPO will generally be quoted with three or four decimal place. The smallest price change (Tick) shall be EUR 0.0005, EUR 0.001, EUR 0.01 or CHF 0.01 or GBX* 0.5, GBX 0.25 or USD 0.01. For stock options with group ID NL11, NL12 and NL13, the tick size will increase to EUR 0.05 for contracts with a premium above a predefined threshold stipulated in Annex B (Premium Threshold). The Management Boards of the Eurex Exchanges shall determine the relevant decimal place and the smallest price change (Tick) and shall notify all Exchange participation of any such decision. 3. Part: Contracts Off-Book […] Contract Specifications for Futures Contracts and Eurex14e Options Contracts at Eurex Deutschland and Eurex Zürich As of 22.01.2018 Page 2 3.3.4.2 Annex B: in relation to Subsection 2.6 of the Contract Specifications: […] Options on shares of Product-ID Group ID Minimum price Premium Minimum price change below Threshold change above threshold threshold Aalberts Industries N.V. AAI NL12 0.01 0.5 0.05 ABN AMRO Group AAR NL11 0.01 5 0.05 AEGON N.V. AEN NL11 0.01 5 0.05 Koninklijke Ahold NL11 Delhaize N.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Remuneration Report
    REMUNERATION REPORT The first part of this report outlines the current remuneration ■ Performance related conditional shares and performance policy as adopted by the Annual General Meeting (AGM) on related conditional options as part of the long-term 6 May 2014. The second part contains details of the incentive instead of unconditional options. remuneration in 2014 of the members of the Board of Management and of the Supervisory Board. More The remuneration policy is also applicable to members of the information on remuneration and on share and option Executive Committee who are not a member of the Board of ownership of members of the Board of Management is Management. available in note 5.63 of the financial statements in this annual report. This remuneration report is also available on The revised remuneration policy was adopted by the AGM Fugro’s website. on 6 May 2014 and took effect retroactively as from 1 January 2014. This report has been prepared by the remuneration committee of the Supervisory Board. The main function of Labour market reference group this committee is to prepare the decision-making of the In preparing the revised remuneration policy, the Supervisory Board regarding the remuneration policy for the remuneration committee used external benchmark Board of Management and the application of this policy to information to assess market comparability of the the remuneration of the individual members of the Board of remuneration. The labour market reference group consists of Management. The remuneration policy will be reviewed every 14 Dutch listed companies of comparable scope with highly three years to verify its market conformity.
    [Show full text]
  • 150903 Fungible6&7 TOMTOM
    FINAL TERMS DATED 3 SEPTEMBER 2015 BNP Paribas Arbitrage Issuance B.V. (incorporated in The Netherlands) (as Issuer) BNP Paribas (incorporated in France) (as Guarantor) (Warrant and Certificate Programme) EUR "Open End Turbo" Certificates relating to a Share In respect of Series Number NL0011247176 (Royal BAM Group N.V.) 50,000 Certificates are to be consolidated on 1 June 2015 and form a single series with the current outstanding amount of the 50,000 Certificates issued on 20 May 2015 and the 50,000 Certificates issued on 12 May 2015. In respect of Series Number NL0011247515 (ING Groep N.V.) 200,000 Certificates are to be consolidated on 16 June 2015 and form a single series with the current outstanding amount of the 100,000 Certificates issued on 15 June 2015 and the 100,000 Certificates issued on 12 May 2015. In respect of Series Number NL0011247507 (ING Groep N.V.) 100,000 Certificates are to be consolidated on 20 August 2015 and form a single series with the current outstanding amount of the 100,000 Certificates issued on 12 May 2015. In respect of Series Number NL0011247804 (TomTom International B.V.) 50,000 Certificates are to be consolidated on 3 September 2015 and form a single series with the current outstanding amount of the 100,000 Certificates issued on 12 May 2015. In respect of Series Number NL0011247796 (TomTom International B.V.) 50,000 Certificates are to be consolidated on 3 September 2015 and form a single series with the current outstanding amount of the 100,000 Certificates issued on 12 May 2015.
    [Show full text]