Ranking of Districts According to Rural Backwardness and Potential for Fisheries Development - State Punjab
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Ranking of Districts according to Rural Backwardness and potential for Fisheries Development - State Punjab Gross Cropped Ratio of Irrigated AG Dairy Inland Fish Area per Rural GCA Milch Animals Per SL.No District area in NAS Development Development Production population Index 1000 Rural Persons (Irrigation Index) Index Index (MT) (Per 1000) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 Gurdaspur 254.98 0.30 1.00 0.77 8.80 0.06 7170 2 Nawanshahr 390.03 0.47 1.00 0.83 34.18 0.23 3045 3 Barnala 595.24 0.74 1.00 0.91 40.69 0.27 2256 4 Moga 485.60 0.60 1.00 0.87 51.85 0.35 4055 5 Muktsar 664.39 0.83 1.00 0.94 43.64 0.29 4317 6 SAS Nagar 237.65 0.28 1.00 0.76 95.84 0.64 2781 7 Kapurthala 494.30 0.61 1.00 0.87 33.40 0.22 8637 8 Hoshiarpur 275.64 0.33 1.00 0.78 103.72 0.69 7645 9 Firozepur 270.12 0.32 1.00 0.78 224.48 1.00 6650 10 Tarn Taran 382.37 0.46 1.00 0.82 97.25 0.65 6710 11 Faridkot 597.65 0.74 1.00 0.91 68.89 0.46 4093 12 Amritsar 347.51 0.42 1.00 0.81 125.74 0.84 7541 13 Rupnagar 276.87 0.33 1.00 0.78 57.21 0.38 7642 14 Sangrur 543.68 0.67 1.00 0.89 302.22 1.00 6306 15 Mansa 574.05 0.71 1.00 0.90 62.69 0.42 8362 16 Jalandhar 399.79 0.49 1.00 0.83 204.95 1.00 7107 17 Fatehgarh Sahib 451.20 0.55 1.00 0.85 111.91 0.75 3980 18 Ludhiana 406.44 0.50 1.00 0.83 448.19 1.00 10780 19 Bathinda 614.70 0.76 1.00 0.92 203.48 1.00 6356 20 Patiala 435.72 0.53 1.00 0.84 184.93 1.00 9910 Distwise Ranking on Rural Backwardness 1 NFDB Ranking of Districts according to Rural Backwardness and potential for Fisheries Development - State Punjab Annual Inland Fish Area under Inland Fishery Index of Overall Index of Overall Backwardness Backwardness Production per Rural Ponds and SL.No District Development Development Backwardness Rank Rank Person Tanks Index (ID) (1-ID) within State All India (Kgs) (Ha) 1 2 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1 Gurdaspur 4.32 0.01 0.09 0.91 1 278 2066 2 Nawanshahr 6.33 0.02 0.16 0.84 2 502 912 3 Barnala 5.40 0.02 0.16 0.84 3 509 1236 4 Moga 5.16 0.02 0.17 0.83 4 519 2173 5 Muktsar 6.41 0.02 0.18 0.82 5 529 2101 6 SAS Nagar 6.22 0.02 0.22 0.78 6 559 1586 7 Kapurthala 15.98 0.05 0.22 0.78 7 561 1687 8 Hoshiarpur 6.01 0.02 0.22 0.78 8 565 1572 9 Firozepur 4.32 0.01 0.22 0.78 9 568 1536 10 Tarn Taran 6.51 0.02 0.23 0.77 10 571 1735 11 Faridkot 9.86 0.03 0.24 0.76 11 575 1621 12 Amritsar 6.32 0.02 0.24 0.76 12 578 2678 13 Rupnagar 14.90 0.05 0.25 0.75 13 580 1801 14 Sangrur 5.40 0.02 0.25 0.75 14 581 2266 15 Mansa 13.36 0.04 0.26 0.74 15 584 2169 16 Jalandhar 6.88 0.02 0.27 0.73 16 585 1697 17 Fatehgarh Sahib 9.40 0.03 0.27 0.73 17 587 1327 18 Ludhiana 7.39 0.02 0.27 0.73 18 588 2609 19 Bathinda 7.00 0.02 0.28 0.72 19 589 3264 20 Patiala 8.43 0.03 0.29 0.71 20 593 2479 Distwise Ranking on Rural Backwardness 2 NFDB Ranking of Districts according to Rural Backwardness and potential for Fisheries Development - State Punjab Rank based on Rank based on Area under Water Potential Area under Inland fishery Inland fishery Other Water productivity Index for SL.No District Reservoir development development Bodies per 1 MT of Inland (Ha) potential potential (Ha) Fish Sector with in State All India 1 2 17 18 19 20 21 22 1 Gurdaspur 64 0 0.29 0.00 11 423 2 Nawanshahr 0 0 0.30 0.00 10 419 3 Barnala 0 0 0.55 0.00 2 336 4 Moga 0 0 0.54 0.00 3 338 5 Muktsar 0 0 0.49 0.00 5 353 6 SAS Nagar 0 0 0.57 0.00 1 330 7 Kapurthala 0 0 0.20 0.00 20 479 8 Hoshiarpur 561 0 0.21 0.00 19 471 9 Firozepur 0 0 0.23 0.00 18 452 10 Tarn Taran 0 0 0.26 0.00 13 436 11 Faridkot 0 0 0.40 0.00 6 366 12 Amritsar 0 0 0.36 0.00 8 386 13 Rupnagar 40 0 0.24 0.00 17 448 14 Sangrur 0 0 0.36 0.00 7 380 15 Mansa 0 0 0.26 0.00 12 435 16 Jalandhar 0 0 0.24 0.00 16 446 17 Fatehgarh Sahib 0 0 0.33 0.00 9 397 18 Ludhiana 0 0 0.24 0.00 15 445 19 Bathinda 0 0 0.51 0.00 4 344 20 Patiala 0 0 0.25 0.00 14 441 Distwise Ranking on Rural Backwardness 3 NFDB.