Pharmacological Reports Copyright © 2013 2013, 65, 1506–1511 by Institute of Pharmacology ISSN 1734-1140 Polish Academy of Sciences

Review

IsthemGlu5receptorapossibletargetfornew drugs?

AgnieszkaPa³ucha-Poniewiera1,JoannaM.Wieroñska1,PiotrBrañski1, GrzegorzBurnat1,BarbaraChruœcicka1,AndrzejPilc1,2

1Institute of Pharmacology Polish Academy of Sciences, Department of Neurobiology, Smêtna 12, PL 31-343 Kraków, Poland

2Jagiellonian University, Collegium Medicum, Micha³owskiego 12, PL 31-126 Kraków, Poland

Correspondence: Agnieszka Pa³ucha-Poniewiera, e-mail: [email protected]

Abstract: The current treatment of depression, based on conventional antidepressant drugs that influence monoaminergic systems, is not satis- factory, and innovative antidepressant drugs are still needed. The next generation of treatments needs to be more effective, faster- acting and better tolerated than currently used . A growing body of evidence indicates that compounds that modulate the system may be a group of novel and mechanistically distinct agents for the treatment of depression. Both preclini- cal and clinical data show strong, rapid and sustained effects of the NMDA ketamine in treatment-resistant de- pression. However, ketamine cannot be considered as a novel antidepressant drug because of its side-effects and abuse potential. Because glutamatergic transmission is controlled not only by ionotropic but also by metabotropic glutamate receptors, their involve- ment in the etiology and the therapy of depression has also been postulated. Here, we review data supporting the potential antidepres- santactivityofmGlu5receptorantagonistsaswellastheinvolvementofmGlu5receptorsinthepathophysiologyofdepression.

Keywords: antidepressantdrugs,ketamine,mGlu5receptor,MTEP,MPEP,NMDA receptor

Abbreviations: AD – antidepressant drug, BDNF – brain de- theory of depression. One of the new leading hy- rived neurotrophic factor, FST – forced swim test, iGlu recep- potheses of depression is the glutamatergic hypothe- tor – ionotropic , mGlu receptor – meta- sis, which states that the main brain excitatory system botropic glutamate receptor, mTOR – mammalian target of ra- pamycin, NSF – novelty suppressed feeding test, OB – olfac- plays a role in the pathophysiology of depression and tory bulbectomy, PFC – prefrontal cortex, TRD – treatment re- suggests possible antidepressant activity of com- sistantdepression,TST –tailsuspensiontest pounds modulating glutamatergic neurotransmission via activation or inhibition of glutamatergic receptors [27, 31, 33]. Two distinct groups of glutamatergic re- ceptors have been described: ionotropic glutamate re- ceptors (iGlu receptors, including NMDA, AMPA and Introduction kainate receptors), which are coupled to ion channels, and metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptors, which It seems that a breakthrough in the therapy of depres- are a family of G-protein-coupled receptors [25] that sion will require going beyond a monoamine-based are classified into three groups according to their se-

1506 Pharmacological Reports, 2013, 65, 1506–1511 MGlu5receptor asatargetfor newantidepressants Agnieszka Pa³ucha-Poniewiera et al.

quence homology, effector coupling and agonist se- plies a functional relationship. It has been demon- lectivity: group I (mGlu1 and mGlu5), group II strated that activation of the mGlu5 receptor (mGlu2 and mGlu3) and group III (mGlu4, mGlu6, potentiates NMDA receptor activity and that antago- mGlu7andmGlu8)receptors[7]. nists of mGlu5 receptors decrease NMDA receptor Several studies have shown that functional antago- activation [2, 12]. Therefore, mGlu5 receptor antago- nists of NMDA receptors induce antidepressant-like nists may function as mild NMDA receptor negative effects in animal models of depression [33]. Some modulators(Fig.1;forreview,see [34]). clinical trials have also been undertaken. Although a low-affinity, uncompetitive, open-channel NMDA blocker, memantine, has not shown antidepressant ef- fects in humans [21, 40], studies on the uncompetitive AntagonistsofmGlu5receptorsinduce NMDA receptor-trapping blocker ketamine showed antidepressant-likeeffectsinanimal strong, rapid and sustained antidepressant effects in patients suffering from major treatment-resistant de- modelsofdepression pression (TRD) [4, 39], electroconvulsive shock- resistant major depression [17] and bipolar TRD [11]. Behavioral studies have provided some promising re- However, ketamine has significant limitations, includ- sults showing potential antidepressant-like effects of ing undesirable side effects, abuse potential and a lim- mGlu5 receptor antagonists such as MPEP (2- ited route of administration. In all clinical studies methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)pyridine) [14] and MTEP investigating the antidepressant activity of the drug, (3-[(2-methyl-1,3-thiazol-4-yl)ethynyl]pyridine) [8], ketamine was given intravenously by an anesthesiolo- which confirmed their possible application in the ther- gist and hospitalization for at least 24 h post-infusion apy of depression. Both compounds induced antide- was required [1]. Thus, ketamine cannot be consid- pressant-like effects in several models of depression, ered as a safe antidepressant drug (AD) for outpa- such as the forced swim test (FST) [3, 23], the tail tients. However, these studies have provided great hope that modulation of the glutamatergic system, in- cluding NMDA receptors, may lead to a new genera- tionofrapidandefficientADs.

mGlu5receptorligandsmodulateNMDA receptoractivity

Because the clinical value of ketamine and other NMDA receptor antagonists is limited, mGlu ligands have been considered as possible ADs. These com- pounds are free of most adverse effects and possess a fast onset of action [27]. mGlu5 receptors, which are functionally involved in the mild modulation of NMDA receptor activity, may become promising tar- gets for new and safer ADs. mGlu5 receptors pre- dominantly have a postsynaptic localization around iGlu receptors and are associated with the Homer family of proteins, which functionally link group I Fig. 1. Schematic representation of the mGlu5 receptor and NMDA receptor synaptic localization. The spatial proximity of NMDA and mGlu receptors with Shank proteins. Shank proteins, mGlu5 receptors implicates their functional relationship, i.e., mGlu5 on the other hand, function as a part of the NMDA receptors are functionally involved in the mild modulation of the activ- ity of NMDA receptors. Therefore, mGlu5 receptor antagonists may receptor-associated PSD-95 complex [36, 38]. The function as mild NMDA receptor negative modulators and, to some spatial proximity of NMDA and mGlu5 receptors im- extent, may imitate the action of NMDA receptor antagonists

Pharmacological Reports, 2013, 65, 1506–1511 1507 suspension test (TST) [3, 26, 35], the olfactory bul- rone concentration and that this effect was blocked bectomy (OB) model of depression [26, 30, 37] and with a 5-HT1A antagonist. Moreover, desensitization the novelty-suppressed feeding (NSF) test [18]. More of the HPA-axis to stimulation with a 5-HT1A agonist recently, Hughes et al. [16] confirmed and extended after repeated 5-day treatment with MPEP was re- these results, showing potential antidepressant-like ported [6]. Such effects of MPEP are typical of effects of the mGlu5 receptor negative allosteric monoamine-based ADs and suggest the involvement modulator GRN-529 using a battery of animal models of the serotonergic system in the action of MPEP. The of depression and the co-morbid symptoms overrepre- results of a recent behavioral study by Pa³ucha- sented in TRD, namely anxiety and pain. The authors Poniewiera et al. [28] showed that the mGlu5 receptor concluded that the broad-spectrum efficacy profile of antagonist MTEP, similar to fluoxetine used as a ref- GRN-529 indicated that this drug could represent an erence AD, did not induce antidepressant-like effects innovative therapeutic approach to the treatment of in mice pretreated with the tryptophan hydroxylase TRD[16]. inhibitor, PCPA (para-chlorophenylalanine). This re- Behavioral studies have also shown antidepressant- sult showed that the pharmacological depletion of se- like effects of a functional NMDA and mGlu5 recep- rotonin can completely block the antidepressant-like tor antagonist, acamprosate [15], which has been used activity of MTEP in the TST. Furthermore, the therapeutically in human alcoholics as an anti-craving 5HT2A/2C antagonist ritanserin, but not the 5-HT1A an- drug and is considered as a safe substance [5]. The re- tagonist WAY100635, 5HT1B antagonist SB224289 or sults of in vivo studies using the TST suggested that 5HT4 antagonist GR125487, reversed the antidepres- NMDA and mGlu5 receptors were crucial targets of sant- like effects of MTEP in the TST, indicating acamprosateinitsantidepressant-likeactivity[29]. a role of 5HT2A/2C receptors in the antidepressant-like activity of the mGlu5 antagonist. Furthermore, a sub- effective dose of MTEP co-administered with a sub- effective dose of citalopram induced an antidepres- Neuronalandmolecularmechanism sant-like effect in the TST in mice. Such an effect suggests the synergistic action of the SSRI and the oftheantidepressant-likeactivity mGlu5 receptor antagonist, indicating that both com- ofmGlu5receptorantagonists pounds act at different targets to stimulate the same pathway. Several studies have been performed to investigate The mechanism of mGlu5 antagonist antidepres- the mechanism of the antidepressant-like activity of sant-like activity may also be related to the activity of mGlu5 antagonists. The results of behavioral studies the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and have suggested that the interaction between the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)-dependent mGlu5 receptor and NMDA receptor plays an impor- signaling pathways, which have been proposed in the tant role in the antidepressant-like action of mGlu5 antidepressant effects of ketamine [22, 24]. Recent antagonists (Fig. 1). MTEP activity in the FST in mice studies by Duman’s group showed that the NMDA re- depended on NMDA receptor activity [32]. Similar ceptor antagonist ketamine induced rapid activation effects were observed when the antidepressant-like ef- of the mTOR signaling pathway, leading to neuroplas- fects of acamprosate were investigated using the TST tic processes involving increased levels of synaptic in mice [29]. The study by Cowen et al. [9], who signaling proteins and an increased number of func- showed that repeated administration of MTEP de- tional new spine synapses in the prefrontal cortices creased the expression of NMDA receptor NR1 (PFCs) of rats [22]. Seeing that activation of the subunit mRNA in the rat cerebral cortex, may also mTOR signaling pathway may be a key mechanism of suggest the importance of a functional relationship the rapid ketamine antidepressant effect, the possible between mGlu5 receptors and the NMDA receptor involvement of mTOR pathway activation in the anti- complex. depressant effects of mGlu receptor ligands should It has also been found that the antidepressant-like also be considered. It has been shown that the group II activity of mGlu5 antagonists depended on serotoner- mGlu receptor antagonists MGS0039 and LY341495 gic system activation. Bradbury et al. [6] showed that induce antidepressant-like effects using a mechanism a single dose of MTEP increased plasma corticoste- that involves increased mTOR pathway activity [13,

1508 Pharmacological Reports, 2013, 65, 1506–1511 MGlu5receptor asatargetfor newantidepressants Agnieszka Pa³ucha-Poniewiera et al.

19]. In contrast, mTOR activation seems to not be in- Conclusions volved in the antidepressant-like activity of the mGlu5 receptor antagonist MPEP in the NSF test in mice [18]. However, a protein synthesis inhibitor ani- Glutamate receptors have become new important tar- somycin blocked the sustained effects of MPEP, sug- gets for medication development for the treatment of gesting the involvement of new protein synthesis. depression. Among mGlu receptors, the mGlu5 recep- Furthermore, the role of BDNF activity in the mecha- tor seems to be a good target for a novel AD. Numer- nism of MPEP antidepressant activity has been ex- ous preclinical data indicate that antagonists of plored. On the one hand, it has been shown that the mGlu5 receptors induce antidepressant-like effects. Trk (tyrosine kinase) inhibitor K252a did not block However, most of the compounds that exhibited bene- the sustained effect of MPEP in the NSF test in mice, ficial properties in the animal models of depression suggesting that BDNF–Trk B receptor signaling may have never been tested in humans. Currently, the not play a role in the activity of MPEP [18]. On the clinical trials of new mGlu5 antagonists are underway other hand, the study by Legutko et al. [20] showed that, in the next few years, should bring results that that MPEP, similar to the classic AD desipramine, in- determine the potential for clinical application of creased BDNF mRNA levels in the rat hippocampus mGlu5antagonists. after chronic administration, suggesting that the blockade of mGlu5 receptors may induce expression of BDNF via the reduction of glutamatergic neuro- Acknowledgment: transmission that may finally result in the antidepres- ThisworkwassupportedbythegrantPOIG.01.01.02-12-004/09 “Depression-Methods-Therapy”,task.3.7. santeffect.

References:

PossibleclinicalapplicationsofmGlu5 1. AanHetRotM,ZarateCA Jr,CharneyDS,MathewSJ: receptorantagonistsinthetherapy Ketaminefordepression:wheredowegofromhere? ofdepression BiolPsychiatry,2012,72,537–547. 2. AwadH,HubertGW,SmithY,LeveyAI,ConnPJ:Acti- vationofmetabotropicglutamatereceptor5hasdirect excitatoryeffectsandpotentiatesNMDA receptorcur- An important role for mGlu5 receptors in depression rentsinneuronsofthesubthalamicnucleus.JNeurosci, has been suggested by studies in humans. Post- 2000,20,7871–7879. 3. mortem analyses of prefrontal cortices from major de- BelozertsevaIV,KosT,PopikP,DanyszW,Bespalov AY:Antidepressant-likeeffectsofmGluR1andmGluR5 pression disorder (MDD) subjects showed lower lev- antagonistsintheratforcedswimandthemousetailsus- els of mGlu5 protein expression in the prefrontal cor- pensiontests.EurNeuropsychopharmacol,2007,17, tex relative to controls [10]. Furthermore, positron 172–179. emission tomography (PET) studies in humans 4. BermanRM,CappielloA,AnandA,OrenDA,Heninger showed lower levels of mGlu5 binding in several GR,CharneyDS,KrystalJA:Antidepressanteffectsof ketamineindepressedpatients.BiolPsychiatry,2000, brain regions of unmedicated patients with MDD 47,351–354. comparedtohealthycontrolsubjects[10]. 5. BoothbyLA,DoeringPL:Acamprosateforthetreatment Preclinical studies investigating the potential anti- ofalcoholdependence.ClinTher,2005,27,695–714. depressant effects of mGlu5 receptor antagonists led 6. BradburyMJ,GiracelloDR,ChapmanDF,HoltzG, SchaffhauserH,RaoSP,VarneyMA, AndersonJJ: to the introduction of two different mGlu5 receptor Metabotropicglutamatereceptor5antagonist-induced antagonists, namely RG7090 (RO4917523, Roche) stimulationofhypothalamic-pituitary-adrenalaxisactiv- and AZD2066 (Astra-Zeneca), into Phase II trials in ity:interactionwithserotonergicsystems.Neuropharma- patients with TRD or MDD. Currently, a Phase II cology,2003,44,562–572. 7. study with RG7090 is underway as adjunctive therapy ConnPJ,PinJP:Pharmacologyandfunctionsofmeta- botropicglutamatereceptors.AnnRevPharmacolToxi- in patients with MDD (see http://www.clinicaltri- col,1997,37,205–237. als.gov/ct2/show/NCT01437657?term=RO4917523& 8. CosfordND,TehraniL,RoppeJ,SchweigerE,Smith rank=6). ND,AndersonJ,BristowL etal.:3-[(2-Methyl-1,3-

Pharmacological Reports, 2013, 65, 1506–1511 1509 thiazol-4-yl)ethynyl]-pyridine:apotentandhighlyselec- 20. LegutkoB,SzewczykB,Pomierny-Chamio³oL,Nowak tivemetabotropicglutamatesubtype5receptorantago- G,PilcA:EffectofMPEP treatmentonbrain-derived nistwithanxiolyticactivity.JMedChem,2003,46, neurotrophicfactorgeneexpression.PharmacolRep, 204–206. 2006,58,427–430. 9. CowenMS,DjoumaE,LawrenceAJ:Themetabotropic 21. LenzeEJ,SkidmoreER,BegleyAE,NewcomerJW, glutamate5receptorantagonist3-[(2-methyl-1,3- ButtersMA,WhyteEM:Memantineforlate-lifedepres- thiazol-4-yl)ethynyl]-pyridinereducesethanolself- sionandapathyafteradisablingmedicalevent:a12- administrationinmultiplestrainsofalcohol-preferring week,double-blindplacebo-controlledpilotstudy.Int ratsandregulatesolfactoryglutamatergicsystems. JGeriatrPsychiatry,2012,27,974–980. JPharmacolExpTher,2005,315,590–600. 22. LiN,LeeB,LiuRJ,BanasrM,DwyerJM,IwataM, 10. DeschwandenA,KarolewiczB,FeyissaAM,TreyerV, LiXY etal.:mTOR-dependentsynapseformationunder- AmetameySM,JohayemA,BurgerCetal.:Reduced liestherapidantidepressanteffectsofNMDA antago- metabotropicglutamatereceptor5densityinmajorde- nists.Science,2010,329,959–964. pressiondeterminedby[11C]ABP688PET andpostmor- 23. LiX,NeedAB,BaezM,WitkinJM:Metabotropicglu- temstudy.AmJPsychiatry,2011,168,727–734. tamate5receptorantagonismisassociatedwith 11. DiazgranadosN,IbrahimL,BrutscheNE,NewbergA, antidepressant-likeeffectsinmice.JPharmacolExp KronsteinP,KhalifeS,KammererWA etal.:A random- Ther,2006,319,254–259. izedadd-ontrialofanN-methyl-D-aspartateantagonist 24. LiuRJ,LeeFS,LiXY,BambicoF,DumanRS, intreatment-resistantbipolardepression.ArchGenPsy- AghajanianGK:Brain-derivedneurotrophicfactor chiatry,2010,67,793–802. Val66Metalleleimpairsbasalandketamine-stimulated 12. DohertyAJ,PalmerMJ,BortolottoZA,HargreavesA, synaptogenesisinprefrontalcortex.BiolPsychiatry, KingstonAE,OrnsteinPL,SchoeppDDetal.:A novel, 2012,71,996–1005. competitivemGlu5 receptorantagonist(LY344545) 25. NakanishiS:Moleculardiversityofglutamatereceptors blocksDHPG-inducedpotentiationofNMDA responses andimplicationsforbrainfunction.Science,1992,258, butnottheinductionofLTP inrathippocampalslices. 597–603. BrJPharmacol,2000,131,239–244. 26. Pa³uchaA,BrañskiP,SzewczykB,WieroñskaJM, 13. DwyerJM,LepackAE,DumanRS:mTORactivationis K³akK,PilcA:Potentialantidepressant-likeeffectof requiredfortheantidepressanteffectsofmGluR2/3 MTEP,apotentandhighlyselectivemGluR5antagonist. blockade.IntJNeuropsychopharmacol,2012,15, PharmacolBiochemBehav,2005,81,901–906. 429–434. 27. Pa³uchaA,PilcA:Metabotropicglutamatereceptor 14. GaspariniF,LingenhöhlK,StoehrN,FlorPJ,Heinrich ligandsaspossibleanxiolyticandantidepressantdrugs. M,VranesicI,BiollazMetal.:2-Methyl-6-(phenylethy- PharmacolTher,2007,115,116–147. nyl)-pyridine(MPEP),apotent,selectiveandsystemi- 28. Pa³ucha-PoniewieraA,BrañskiP,WieroñskaJM, callyactivemGlu5receptorantagonist.Neuropharma- StachowiczK,S³awiñskaA,PilcA:Theantidepressant- cology,1999,38,1493–1503. likeactionofmGlu5receptorantagonist,MTEP,in 15. HarrisBR,PrendergastMA,GibsonDA,RogersDT, thetailsuspensiontestinmiceisserotonindependent. BlanchardJA,HolleyRC,FuMC:Acamprosateinhibits Psychopharmacology,2013,doi:10.1007/s00213-013- thebindingandneurotoxiceffectsoftrans-ACPD,sug- 3206-6. gestinganovelsiteofactionatmetabotropicglutamate 29. Pa³ucha-PoniewieraA,PilcA:InvolvementofmGlu5 receptors.AlcoholClinExpRes,2002,26,1779–1793. andNMDA receptorsintheantidepressant-likeeffectof 16. HughesZA,NealSJ,SmithDL,SukoffRizzoSJ,Puli- acamprosateinthetailsuspensiontest.ProgNeuropsy- cicchioCM,LotarskiS,LuS.:Negativeallostericmodu- chopharmacolBiolPsychiatry,2012,39,102–106. lationofmetabolicglutamatereceptor5resultsinbroad 30. PilcA,K³odziñskaA,BrañskiP,NowakG,Pa³uchaA, spectrumactivityrelevanttotreatmentresistantdepres- SzewczykB,TatarczyñskaE:MultipleMPEP admini- sion.Neuropharmacology,2012,66,202–214. strationsevokeanxiolytic-andantidepressant-likeef- 17. IbrahimL,DiazgranadosN,LuckenbaughDA, fectsinrats.Neuropharmacology,2002,43,181–187. Machado-VieiraR,BaumannJ,MallingerAG,Zarate 31. PilcA,WieroñskaJM,SkolnickP:Glutamate-basedan- CA Jr:Rapiddecreaseindepressivesymptomswithan tidepressants:PreclinicalPsychopharmacology.Biol N-methyl-D-aspartateantagonistinECT-resistantmajor Psychiatry,2013,73,1125–113. depression.ProgNeuropsychopharmacolBiolPsychia- 32. Pomierny-Chamio³oL,PoleszakE,PilcA,NowakG: try,2011,35,1155–1159. NMDA butnotAMPA glutamatergicreceptorsarein- 18. IijimaM,FukumotoK,ChakiS:Acuteandsustainedef- volvedintheantidepressant-likeactivityofMTEP dur- fectsofametabotropicglutamate5receptorantagonist ingtheforcedswimtestinmice.PharmacolRep,2010, inthenovelty-suppressedfeedingtest.BehavBrainRes, 62,1186–1190. 2012,235,287–292. 33. SkolnickP:Antidepressantsforthenewmillennium.Eur 19. KoikeH,IijimaM,ChakiS:Involvementofthemam- JPharmacol,1999,375,31-40. maliantargetofrapamycinsignalinginthe 34. SzewczykB,Pa³ucha-PoniewieraA,PoleszakE,PilcA, antidepressant-likeeffectofgroupIImetabotropicgluta- NowakG:InvestigationalNMDA receptormodulators matereceptorantagonists.Neuropharmacology,2011, fordepression.ExpertOpinInvestigDrugs,2012,21, 61,1419–1423. 91–102.

1510 Pharmacological Reports, 2013, 65, 1506–1511 MGlu5receptor asatargetfor newantidepressants Agnieszka Pa³ucha-Poniewiera et al.

35. TatarczyñskaE,K³odziñskaA,Chojnacka-WójcikE, ofgroup1metabotropicglutamatereceptorswithmulti- Pa³uchaA,GaspariniF,KuhnR,PilcA:Potentialanxio- valentcomplexesofhomer-related,synapticproteins. lytic-andantidepressant-likeeffectsofMPEP,apotent, Neuron,1998,21,707–716. selectiveandsystemicallyactivemGlu5receptorantago- 39. ZarateCA Jr,SinghJB,CarlsonPJ,BrutscheNE,Ameli nist.BrJPharmacol,2001,132,1423–1430. R,LuckenbaughDA,CharneyDS, ManjiHK: A ran- 36. TuJC,XiaoB,NaisbittS,YuanJP,PetraliaRS,Brake- domizedtrialofanN-methyl-D-aspartateantagonistin manP,DoanA etal.:CouplingofmGluR/Homerand treatment-resistantmajordepression.ArchGenPsychia- PSD-95complexesbytheShankfamilyofpostsynaptic try,2006,63,856–864. densityproteins.Neuron,1999,23,583–592. 40. ZarateCA Jr,SinghJB,QuirozJA,DeJesusG, 37. WieroñskaJM,SzewczykB,BrañskiP,Pa³uchaA,Pilc DenicoffKK,LuckenbaughDA,ManjiHK, Charney A:Antidepressant-likeeffectofMPEP,apotent,selec- DS: A double-blind,placebo-controlledstudyofmeman- tiveandsystemicallyactivemGlu5receptorantagonist tineinthetreatmentofmajordepression.AmJPsychia- intheolfactorybulbectomizedrats.AminoAcids,2002, try,2006,163,153–155. 23,213–216. 38. XiaoB,TuJC,PetraliaRS,YuanJP,DoanA,Breder Received: July 18, 2013; in the revised form: September 20, 2013; CD,RuggieroA etal.:Homerregulatestheassociation accepted: September 23, 2013.

Pharmacological Reports, 2013, 65, 1506–1511 1511