1 1 Memo on the 2012 Gains Made by Jp Morgan Thanks to the « London

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1 1 Memo on the 2012 Gains Made by Jp Morgan Thanks to the « London 1 Memo on the 2012 gains made by Jp Morgan thanks to the « London Whale » event Introduction It will be one thing to show that the bank did make huge gains right when the “London Whale” event surged. Still it could have been a coincidence. It is another thing to prove that those gains were done thanks to this “London Whale-Loss at CIO” event specifically. The suspicion then would be easy if that was a crime novel: “see who profits from the crime” right? Beware of the smokes and mirrors now… It would be again one success to show what the close connection was between the CIO loss and the JMorgan massive gains. It would be quite another achievement to show that the bank top executives did act so that the loss at CIO would be as big as possible on well targeted positions. Even then, once this fact is ascertained, this would not prove that the bank senior management alone deliberately wanted to crash the CIO so scandalously. It would even less suggest that the bank was the one that misled investors and the markets on the way…. If the bank executives actually did so then and “in hindsight” too, they certainly bear a huge responsibility…. They might not be alone in that case though. Yet even if that had happened, it may still be possible that this course of events had indeed run out of their control and they had just tried their very best to save the bank here. And one must wonder how the regulators would have missed “that” too at the time given the intense scrutiny that they would profess with regards to their subsequent investigations. The bank executives may have been heroes actually for the country or the markets or both, acting as per the “superior interest of the nation” that was being dictated to them…. The purpose of this document is meant to address those points as granularly as possible. In particular the emphasis will be placed on the fact that this loss at CIO was under full control and profitable for the bank right through the events themselves. Some things indeed went out of control around Iksil’s communications and Drew’s reactions among other things. Not the least, the bank created as many distractions as possible for the public while observers tried to understand how profitable or un-profitable the whole operation had been. Carl Levin loudly complained that the light had not been made at all on the matter in September 2013. This conclusion of Levin prevails in September 2017 actually. Is it too late? This document may sound very “technical” from the start. It is needed unfortunately so in order to reconcile the facts with the accounting ledgers of the bank and dissolve the crowd of decoys that had been planted here on the front stage all along. For the sake of completeness the reader will first find below the many topics that have been analyzed. Yet, on what follows, not all of those items will be developed as otherwise the document would have taken really hundreds of pages. So there will be this quick “summarized plan” for the experts to see the overall framework that led to this memorandum on the gains that JpMorgan did make in the course of the “London Whale” event. Next there will be a detailed description of what happened and how this combined with key inferences to lead to a salient conclusion. The reader next should usefully read the “Var History” document. Thus a full picture will be accessible as to the last key point that is to determine whether the bank top executives did construct all this manipulation on purpose, aside from the bits and pieces that went out of their control in the process as they say. Summarized Plan: the essentials (they will not be all depicted here) 1- How to read through the 10-Q and 10-K reports? a. ‘identical underlying’, Gross amounts, netted amounts, ‘fair value’, ‘carrying value’ i. What is audited (net interest income) and what is not audited (trading related income) 1. Main reference tables present in the 10-Q reports a. GCB, DCM, CIO, treasury, liquidity reserve (not developed much) i. Mark to market, Measuring Fair value and fair value election 1 2 2- What is the actual bonanza brought up by the “London whale” event? a. Clearing the legend: Table on gross P&L balances i. Tangible equity history: the Ariane Thread since 1999 1. SFAS107 history and “other collateral”: the root cause for the scandal a. PWC vs JPM: the ongoing mismatch that cleared in 2012 i. Cost of assets and liabilities that eased in 2012 1. “other assets” that shrank in 2012 3- How did the loss spread into the book in 2012? In a well organized way actually a. Effect of Dec 15th 2011, next Feb 9th, March 12th, April 6th, May 10th 2012 i. Balance of losses during H1 2012: the trades were scrutinized 1. Drift of IG9 forward spread in 2012: the trades were well executed overall a. Long term history of skew: the trades were sensible i. Simulated Recovery: the trades were NOT flawed 4- How did the bank report the event itself? a. The actual $6 billion loss attribution: 100% senior management subjectivity i. RFS: complete distraction 1. Deferred tax “benefit” trick: what a unique reporting error a. Maiden Lane: playing with calendars i. Provisions: increased not released 5- Conclusion: the bank made huge gains, acted on purpose all along and hid them as much as possible a. The year 2012 vs the others….A damn good year! i. Initial descriptions of the firm: misleading at best 1. Restated numbers (through the restatement): what about 2011 then? a. Final comment on descriptions and restatement; that was a “tempest in a teapot” when all is told… Developed plan now…… 1- How to read through the 10-Q and 10-K reports? a. ‘identical underlying’, Gross amounts, netted amounts, ‘fair value’, ‘carrying value’ The reference document here is the 10-Q report filed on may 10th 2012 for the first quarter of 2012 The very start of this document is tough but necessary to grasp the picture of the backbone of the “London Whale” scandal. These are just 4 lines right below here that one should really take the time to understand…..This will open the way to address the question: “how did the performance of the “tranche book” of CIO (the SCP apparently for the bank) enter the firm-wide valuation process?”. 4 Stages will be shortly pictured on the follow: the “gross notional” step, the “netting” step, the “risk modeling based on identical underlying” step, the ALCO or “senior management” step. These four lines are describing the root of all the scandal that will surface under the banner “the London Whale”. The content will certainly look quite abstract and the reader is invited to revert as often as necessary in order to see that those 4 lines describe the “skew risk”. The “skew risk” is what bothered Dimon and the regulators as early as 2005. It had paved the way of JpMorgan the legendary Investment Bank for a decade already. It is the risk that is inherent to the CDS markets from their very start back in 1994. It is what will induce the creation of CIO in 2005. It is what will spark the birth of the future “tranche book” within CIO in 2006.Yet this big book could NOT have a name. This was also due to the very nature of the “skew risk” that is actually described opaquely in these 4 lines below (legal documentation issue). This “skew risk” is ALSO what will be the common denominator behind just all the hedging strategies 2 3 that will be deployed through the “tranche book” of CIO since 2007. It is also the “skew risk” that will spark the financial crisis in 2008 predictably so. It is what will prompt the “exotic credit wind down” plan of Dimon in 2010. It is what will delay for few more months in 2012 the quite seamless transfer of the “tranche book” towards the IB as a preliminary step to finalize this “wind down” plan. This delay here and the skew were known as such by all the regulators in late 2011. It is the price of this “skew risk” through the IG9 10yr index in 2012 that will determine the instant reported “tangible capital gain” that the firm will record starting in August 2012. The “skew risk” while being so truly central is nevertheless the risk that the bank and all the regulators will keep away from the public sight all along those years. One has just these basic 4 lines below….. There is just one Keyword in the “London Whale” scandal that matters : “Identical underlying” : ”(c) Represents the total notional amount of protection purchased where the underlying reference instrument is identical to the reference instrument on protection sold; the notional amount of protection purchased for each individual identical underlying reference instrument may be greater or lower than the notional amount of protection sold. “ The table above shows that about $3 trillion of “credit derivative” (or CDS for the sake of simplicity) protection is purchased on one type say “A” of CDS and an almost equivalent amount of $3 trillion of CDS protection is sold on a different CDS type called say “B”. These $3 trillion exposures are to sit one in front of the other every day at JpMorgan. They are NOT to be “fungible” in principle, ie to be collapsed altogether in the form of a much reduced net exposure any time soon in real life.
Recommended publications
  • Global Events
    GLOBAL EVENTS Education • Professional Leverage • Networking • Philanthropy Industry Icons Sep 18, 2013 New York: A Conversation With Adena T. Friedman, Chief Financial Officer, The Carlyle Group Adena Friedman, Chief Financial Officer, The Carlyle Group Bill Stone, Founder and CEO, Moderator, SS&C Technologies Jun 3, 2013 Washington: Conversation with David M. Rubenstein, Co-Founder, The Carlyle Group David M. Rubenstein, Co-Founder, The Carlyle Group Jeffrey R. Houle, Moderator, Partner, DLA Piper Apr 3, 2013 New York: Fireside Chat with Saba Capital's Boaz Weinstein Boaz Weinstein, Founder & CIO, Saba Capital Stephanie Ruhle, Moderator, Anchor, Bloomberg Oct 30, 2012 Newport Beach: A Conversation with Dr. Mohamed El-Erian of PIMCO: Investing in a Zero-Interest Rate Environment Dr. Mohamed El-Erian, Chief Executive Officer and Co-CIO, PIMCO Lupin Rahman, Moderator, Executive Vice President, PIMCO Marc Seidner, Managing Director and Generalist Portfolio Manager, PIMCO Qi Wang, Managing Director and Portfolio Manager, PIMCO Oct 16, 2012 New York: Know Yourself and Your Decision-Making Process: A Conversation with Nobel Laureate Dr. Daniel Kahneman Dr. Daniel Kahneman, Eugene Higgins Professor of Psychology and Professor of Public Affairs Emeritus, Princeton University Jason Zweig, Moderator, Columnist, Wall Street Journal Sep 19, 2012 New York: Conversation with Eric E. Schmidt, Executive Chairman of Google Eric E. Schmidt, Executive Chairman, Google Apr 30, 2012 New York: An Armchair Discussion with John J. Mack on Leadership John J. Mack, former Chairman and CEO, Morgan Stanley Joanne Pace, Moderator, former Chief Operating Officer, Morgan Stanley Investment Management Jan 25, 2012 Geneva: Philippe Jabre Talks Markets Philippe Jabre, Chief Investment Officer, Jabre Capital Partners Dec 8, 2011 Los Angeles: Dinner Event with Howard Marks, Chairman, Oaktree Capital Oct 26, 2011 Los Angeles: Renee Haugerud, Founder, CIO & Managing Principal, Galtere, Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Bloomberg Briefs: Hedge Funds
    Tuesday March 7, 2017 March 7, 2017 Alaska's Wealth Fund Seeks 11 Funds for Investments Number of the Week By Hema Parmar Alaska’s $55.4 billion wealth fund is seeking up to 11 hedge funds for allocations, following its decision in May to redeem from its funds of hedge funds and invest in $1.06 Billion managers directly. The Alaska Permanent Fund Corp. prefers experienced managers that have a track Net inflows into macro hedge funds in record of producing returns of at least inflation plus 5 percent, according to public January, according to eVestment. documents from its quarterly board of trustees meeting. Alaska is seeking funds with low correlation to equity markets, "appropriate" risk controls as measured by historical drawdowns and volatility and that can show they have protected capital during down Inside markets, the documents from the Feb. 22-23 board meeting show. Equity-focused Viking Global saw a Marcus Frampton, Alaska’s director of private markets, declined to comment. slight loss in February, while Alaska currently has nine managers in its program that invests directly in hedge funds. Renaissance's equities fund gained It plans to invest a total 5 percent of the firm’s assets, or about $2.8 billion, in managers in the month: Returns in Brief via that program, the documents said. As of Dec. 31, Alaska had a 4.5 percent exposure to commingled funds, either directly Macro funds run by Prologue and or via the funds of hedge funds from which it is redeeming. The move to allocate to State Street are closing: Closures managers directly will save Alaska $15 million a year, according to the documents, as it allows the wealth fund to cut the layer of fees paid to funds of funds for making Ray Dalio jolts Bridgewater as Jon investments.
    [Show full text]
  • Credit Default Swaps: Indices, Curves and Their Relationship to Volatility
    Find our latest analyses and trade ideas on bsic.it Credit Default Swaps: indices, curves and their relationship to volatility Introduction Credit Default Swaps (CDSs) have had an interesting trajectory to say the least, starting out as a niche derivative, they rose to prominence after the Russian financial crisis of 1998, ballooning into a market worth an enormous $62.2 trillion in 2007. In 2008, this market promptly collapsed, producing a mushroom cloud worthy of Warren Buffet’s designation of CDSs as ‘financial weapons of mass destruction.’ However, the CDS market is far from finished, standing at $8.8 trillion in the first half of 2020 according to the Bank for International Settlements. In this article we’ll give a quick primer on the theory underpinning these derivatives and explore CDS indices and their arbitrage, curve trades, and the relationship between credit risk and equity volatility, proposing a pairs trade. What are Credit Default Swaps and how do they work? Credit Default Swaps are over the counter financial contracts that allow investors to regulate their exposure to credit risk. While the most straightforward use of credit derivatives is to hedge the risk derived from investing in bonds or other credit securities, they are also used to express views on the creditworthiness of one or more entities (i.e., the governments or corporations who issue the bonds.) Beyond taking a simple directional bet in the form of buying/selling a single-name CDS, investors can express their view on the relative value of two different credits (pairs trading), the time when an entity will default (curve trading), the capital structure of the entity etc.
    [Show full text]
  • How Profitable Is Capital Structure Arbitrage?
    How ProÞtable Is Capital Structure Arbitrage? Fan Yu1 University of California, Irvine First Draft: September 30, 2004 This Version: January 18, 2005 1I am grateful to Yong Rin Park for excellent research assistance and Vineer Bhansali, Nai-fu Chen, Darrell Duffie, Philippe Jorion, Dmitry Lukin, Stuart Turnbull, Ashley Wang, Sanjian Zhang, Gary Zhu, and seminar participants at UC-Irvine and PIMCO for insightful discussions. The credit default swap data are acquired from CreditTrade. Address correspondence to Fan Yu, UCI-GSM, Irvine, CA 92697-3125, E-mail: [email protected]. How ProÞtable Is Capital Structure Arbitrage? Abstract This paper examines the risk and return of the so-called “capital structure arbitrage,” which exploits the mispricing between a company’s debt and equity. SpeciÞcally, a structural model connects a company’s equity price with its credit default swap (CDS) spread. Based on the deviation of CDS market quotes from their theoretical counterparts, a convergence-type trading strategy is proposed and analyzed using 4,044 daily CDS spreads on 33 obligors. We Þnd that capital structure arbitrage can be an attractive investment strategy, but is not without its risk. In particular, the risk arises when the arbitrageur shorts CDS and the market spread subsequently skyrockets, resulting in market closure and forcing the arbitrageur into liquidation. We present preliminary evidence that the monthly return from capital structure arbitrage is related to the corporate bond market return and a hedge fund return index on Þxed income arbitrage. Capital structure arbitrage has lately become popular among hedge funds and bank proprietary trading desks. Some traders have even touted it as the “next big thing” or “the hottest strategy” in the arbitrage community.
    [Show full text]
  • Carefully Consider the Fund's Investment Objectives, Risk Factors
    Saba Capital Management, L.P. (“Saba”) Launches an ETF Focused on Closed-End Funds, Including a Rates Hedge (Bats: CEFS) March 20, 2017 Saba launches CEFS, an actively managed ETF that seeks to generate high income by investing in closed-end funds trading at a discount to net asset value (“NAV”) and hedging the ETF’s risk to rising interest rates. This is Saba’s first ETF; Saba is a well-known alternative investment products firm. Closed-end funds are listed investment vehicles that trade at a premium or discount to NAV as a result of market technicals and sentiment. Saba specializes in fixed income and equity closed-end funds trading at a discount to NAV, given they typically offer higher yield and return potential than the underlying securities. A small portion of that excess return is utilized to finance the portfolio’s interest rate hedge. “Many closed-end funds are trading at an attractive discount to their net asset value,” said Boaz Weinstein, Founder and Chief Investment Officer at Saba. “In an environment where investors are searching for yield, we believe closed-end funds offer high income and a margin of safety due to the discount.” The ETF offers access to Saba Capital’s portfolio managers who have years of experience trading and hedging closed-end funds. Saba Capital’s investment process includes proprietary models that dynamically rank closed-end funds across a variety of factors, including yield, discount to NAV and quality of underlying securities. In addition, CEFS seeks to outperform index-based closed-end fund products by actively trading the portfolio in an attempt to capture the widening and narrowing of discounts to net asset value.
    [Show full text]
  • The Big Shorts Saba Capital Netflix Drama
    THE 2020 ADVISER AWARDS THE BIG SHORTS SABA CAPITAL NETFLIX DRAMA ACTIVIST INSIGHT MONTHLY VOLUME 9 ISSUE 11 | DECEMBER 2020 CONTENTS ACTIVIST INSIGHT MONTHLY, DECEMBER 2020. 03 EDITOR’S LETTER | JASON BOOTH, ACTIVIST INSIGHT 04 FEATURE: THE 2020 ADVISER AWARDS 18 THE TERMINATORS | ACTIVIST IN FOCUS: SABA CAPITAL | JASON BOOTH, ACTIVIST INSIGHT 22 NETFLIX DRAMA | IURI STRUTA, ACTIVIST INSIGHT 25 ESG GOES TO WASHINGTON | ESG CORNER | ELEANOR O’DONNELL, ACTIVIST INSIGHT 27 DISCOVERY TIME | VULNERABILITY REPORT: DISCOVERY INC | IURI STRUTA, ACTIVIST INSIGHT 30 THE BIG SHORTS | IBM | ELEANOR O’DONNELL, ACTIVIST INSIGHT 32 SHORT NEWS IN BRIEF 33 NEW SHORT INVESTMENTS 34 NEWS IN BRIEF 38 NEW INVESTMENTS 40 MONTHLY SUMMARY All rights reserved. The entire contents of Activist Insight Monthly are the Copyright of Activist Insight Ltd. No part of this publication may be reproduced without the express prior written approval of an authorized member of the staff of Activist Insight Ltd, and, where permission for online publication is granted, contain a hyperlink to the publication. The information presented herein is for information purposes only and does not constitute and should not be construed as a solicitation or other offer, or recommendation to acquire or dispose of any investment or to engage in any other transaction, or as advice of any nature whatsoever. PUBLISHED BY: 4 Old Park Lane Image credits (All Shutterstock.com) Activist Insight Ltd Mayfair, London, W1U 6PZ Page 7: Evergy, APNPhotography; Page 9: HP, Tomasz +44 (0) 20 7129 1314 Wozniak;
    [Show full text]
  • Filed: New York County Clerk 12/06/2016 12:16 Pm Index No
    FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/06/2016 12:16 PM INDEX NO. 653216/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 102 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/06/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x PUBLIC- SECTOR PENSION INVESTMENT BOARD, : Plaintiff, : Index No. 653216/2015 - against - : AMENDED COMPLAINT SABA CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.P., : SABA CAPITAL OFFSHORE FUND, LTD. and BOAZ WEINSTEIN, : Defendants. : - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x - Plaintiff Public Sector Pension Investment Board ("PSP"), by its attorneys, for its Amended Complaint against defendant Saba Capital Offshore Fund, Ltd. (the "Feeder Fund" or "Fund"), alleges upon knowledge with respect to itself and its own acts, and upon information and belief with respect to all other matters, as follows: SUMMARY OF THIS ACTION 1. PSP brings this action to recover the damages it has suffered as a result of the Feeder Fund's breach of the contractual duties it owed to PSP as an investor in the Feeder Fund, a hedge fund managed by Saba Capital Management, L.P. ("Saba Management") and controlled by Boaz Weinstein ("Weinstein," together with Saba Management, "Saba"). The Fund engaged in this wrongdoing by artificially manipulating the value of PSP's investments in the Fund in order to benefit Saba at the expense of PSP. 2. As part of a master/feeder hedge fund structure, the Feeder Fund allocated substantially all of its assets to a master hedge fund (the "Master Fund"), also managed by Saba Management, that invested in securities across the capital structure of a 1 of 12 number of different companies. Under governing Fund organizational documents, the securities in the Master Fund's investment portfolio were to be valued by Saba in good faith in accordance with an applicable valuation policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Fy 2020In Review
    FY 2020 IN REVIEW 26 years of helping families and individuals fleeing domestic violence by connecting them to safe, affordable housing and services New Building Opens Supporting our 500+ 42 households moved into The Jennings, our most recently completed service-enriched affordable parents and children project, including 23 households headed by Our Family Support Program (FSP) staff provided domestic violence survivors who were in shelter. ongoing support to over 500 adults and children living in our six service-enriched affordable housing developments. This included on-site services like safety planning, case management, job readiness and vocational counseling, as well as off-site services such as behavioral health counseling, legal assistance and job training programs provided by trusted partner agencies. While in-person assistance ceased in March, the support did not. The FSP team worked tirelessly to help our families continue to find stability and to help them navigate the effects of the pandemic. Ribbon cutting for The Jennings Rapid Rehousing Program Ramps Up HousingLink, our innovative rapid rehousing program, connected 25 domestic violence survivors to safe, affordable apartments during the year, despite the challenges posed when the pandemic ended the provision of in-person services. Our HUD-funded rapid rehousing program has now connected over 130 survivors to high-quality apartments and with new staff will be able to Apartment interior – The Jennings help more survivors during the coming year. A testament to the effectiveness of the program’s aftercare support is that 100% of survivors placed Safe at Last in apartments during the year remained stable in 95% of domestic violence survivors in our their homes.
    [Show full text]
  • And Now for Capital Structure Arbitrage Go to Our Specialist Pages on Source: Euromoney Markets and Products and Regions
    And now for capital structure arbitrage Go to our specialist pages on Source: Euromoney markets and products and regions. December 2002 Search for related Euromoney publications Antony Currie and and events Jennifer Morris Markets have crushed banks this year but now some see a profit to be made in arbitraging debt against equity. It’s a smart trick. Turning it into a sustainable business will be even smarter. Household is about to default on its bonds. Or at least that’s what might be inferred by looking at its spreads towards the end of October. The US consumer finance company’s benchmark 10-year bonds, launched last year at a spread of 155 basis points over US treasuries, had hit 800bp over. Default swap prices were even wider at 900bp over. Yet Household still had its single-A rating and its equity price, though way down on its high of $63.25 in April 2002, was still trading steadily at between $22 and $28. Was this really a company about to go bust, or one suffering from the fear and loathing of big debt issuers that has gripped credit investors for much of this year? It sounds like the perfect opportunity for taking a bet on the company’s future by loading up on its bonds at those juicy wide spreads. But wait – what if Household’s bond investors had correctly sensed it was on the point of meltdown and it was the equity investors who were over-optimistic about the company? You would not be able to hedge that long bond position when the default swap was at even wider levels than the bonds.
    [Show full text]
  • The Quants: How a New Breed of Math Whizzes Conquered Wall
    Acad. Quest. (2010) 23:506–514 DOI 10.1007/s12129-010-9189-4 REVIEW ESSAY The Quants: How a New Milken, Warren Buffett.1 In the Breed of Math Whizzes “quant” revolution on Wall Street Conquered Wall Street and that took place over the past twenty Nearly Destroyed It, by Scott years, in which mathematical and Patterson. New York: Crown scientific experts created new high-tech Publishing, 2010, 352 pp., investment strategies, we put the $27.00 hardbound. two together. Everyone from Barney Frank to Ben Bernanke to Fannie My Life as a Quant: Mae to the heads of the Harvard and Reflections on Physics and Yale endowment funds to the chief Finance, by Emanuel Derman. executives of the world’slargest Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & banks and investment banking Sons, 2007, 292, pp., $16.95 houses—even average investors in paperback. many cases—fell under the spell of the quants. The Crash of the Quants It turns out that Roger Lowenstein’s very fine When Genius Failed was Wight Martindale, Jr. wildly mistaken2—so-called “genius” Published online: 27 October 2010 did not fail, it returned with a # Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010 vengeance to create even greater havoc. These two books, The Quants: Americans have long been mesmerized How a New Breed of Math Whizzes by scientific genius. Think Thomas Conquered Wall Street and Nearly Edison and Albert Einstein. We are Destroyed It, by Scott Patterson, and equally fascinated by financial My Life as a Quant: Reflections on wizards: J. P. Morgan, Michael Physics and Finance, by Emanuel Derman, provide contrasting insights Wight Martindale, Jr., is an adjunct professor in both the business school and the college of arts and sciences at Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA 18015; 1 ’ [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • In Association With
    ALI AKAY DANIELE BENATOFF JOHN BURBANK MARK CARHART TONY CHEDRAOUI NEIL CHRISS CHASE COLEMAN STEPHEN CZECH DEREK DUNN JOHN ECKERSON JEFFREY ENSLIN LOIC FERRY BRIAN FRANK CARL STEPHEN GEORGE ROB GIBBONS KAY HAIGH JOHN HO CARL HUTTENLOCHER RAY IWANOWSKI LOREN KATZOVITZ MASSI KHADJENOURI W. VIVIAN LAU BEN LEVINE GREG LIPPMAN JONATHAN MARTIN MARK MCGOLDRICK SAM MORLAND PETER MULLER MICHAEL PASCUTTI GUILLAUME RAMBOURG GERARD SATUR JENS-PETER STEIN MORGAN SZE GEORGE TAYLOR GALIA VELIMUKHAMETOVA JAIME VIESER BOAZ WEINSTEIN MICHAEL WEINSTOCK DANNY YONG JOE ZHOU ALI AKAY DANIELE BENATOFF JOHN BURBANK MARK CARHART TONY CHEDRAOUI NEIL CHRISS CHASE COLEMAN STEPHEN CZECH DEREK DUNN JOHN ECKERSON JEFFREY ENSLIN LOIC FERRY BRIAN FRANK CARL STEPHEN GEORGE ROB GIBBONS KAY HAIGH JOHN HO CARL HUTTENLOCHER RAY IWANOWSKI LOREN KATZOVITZ MASSI KHADJENOURI W. VIVIAN LAU BEN LEVINE GREG LIPPMAN JONATHAN MARTIN MARK MCGOLDRICK SAM MORLAND PETER MULLER MICHAEL PASCUTTI GUILLAUME RAMBOURG GERARD SATUR JENS-PETER STEIN MORGAN SZE GEORGE TAYLOR GALIA VELIMUKHAMETOVA JAIME VIESER BOAZ WEINSTEIN MICHAEL WEINSTOCK DANNY YONG JOE ZHOU ALI AKAY DANIELE BENATOFF JOHN BURBANK MARK CARHART TONY CHEDRAOUI NEIL CHRISS CHASE COLEMAN STEPHEN CZECH DEREK DUNN JOHN ECKERSON JEFFREY ENSLIN LOIC FERRY BRIAN FRANK CARL STEPHEN GEORGE ROB GIBBONS KAY HAIGH JOHN HO CARL HUTTENLOCHER RAY IWANOWSKI LOREN KATZOVITZ MASSI KHADJENOURI W. VIVIAN LAU BEN LEVINE GREG LIPPMAN JONATHAN MARTIN MARK MCGOLDRICK SAM MORLAND PETER MULLER MICHAEL PASCUTTI GUILLAUME RAMBOURG GERARD SATUR JENS-PETER STEIN MORGAN SZE GEORGE TAYLOR GALIA VELIMUKHAMETOVA JAIME VIESER BOAZ WEINSTEIN MICHAEL WEINSTOCK DANNY YONG JOE ZHOU ALI AKAY DANIELE BENATOFF JOHN BURBANK MARK CARHART TONY CHEDRAOUI NEIL CHRISS CHASE COLEMAN STEPHEN CZECH DEREK DUNN JOHN ECKERSON JEFFREY ENSLIN LOIC FERRY BRIAN FRANK CARL STEPHEN GEORGE ROB GIBBONS KAY HAIGH JOHN HO CARL HUTTENLOCHER RAY IWANOWSKI LOREN KATZOVITZ MASSI KHADJENOURI W.
    [Show full text]
  • New Signatory
    Newsletter November 2013 Dear All, Below is our November report on the developments at the HFSB. New Signatory We are delighted to welcome a new addition to the HFSB family: Saba Capital Management, L.P. (USA) HFSB Annual North American Stakeholder Event The HFSB held its annual North American Stakeholder Forum on 25th November 2013 in New York City. The event was hosted by KPMG and included a roundtable where the HFSB Signatories, Investor Chapter members and Core Supporters presented case studies on topics ranging from AIFM-D Third Country rules, dealing with insider trading to discovering conflicts in fund documentation, corporate governance and analysing fund expenses. The keynote speech was made by Marc Wyatt, Senior Specialized Examiner, Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations, U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission. He highlighted that “investors play an important role in driving better standards in the industry and the HFSB created a helpful mechanism for collaboration between managers and investors”. Carlos Ferreira of PAAMCO, who was one of the presenters, noted: “This HFSB event provided a great platform for a useful dialogue between managers and investors. It has been educational, constructive and to the point. We need more events like this”. Upcoming Institutional Investor Roundtable in the Nordic Region The HFSB is holding its second annual Nordic event in Helsinki on 4 December 2013. The event will be hosted by Varma Mutual Pension Insurance Company and will include a roundtable where practical case studies will be presented by the HFSB Core Supporters Towers Watson, Unigestion and PAAMCO, HFSB Signatory Matterhorn Investment Management and Varma Mutual Pension Insurance Company.
    [Show full text]