David Garrick

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

David Garrick /5W BOUGHT WITH THE INCOME FROM THE SAGE ENDOWMENT FUND THE GIFT OF menrg m. Sage X891 iZ(^/ r'ifi ' s ^r Thf date shpwp when +his Wrme wc' ' Date Due iiE- r^ ieoA, ^- " . i' w rm^ »»^»n Mmrw ^rntf— PRINTED IN U. 5. A, CAT. NO. 23233 cSf Cornell University Library PN 2598.G24K69 1894 David Garrick 3 1924 027 133 614 DAVID GARRICK The original of tliis book is in tlie Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924027133614 DAVID GARRICK from a painting by Gainsiorough in the posseseion of M''-? Kay. DAVID GARRICK JOSEPH KNIGHT, F.S.A. WITH ETCHED PORTRAIT BY W. BOUCHER From a Painting by Gainsborough in the possession of Mrs. Kay LONDON KEGAN PAUL, TRENCH, TRUBNER & CO., Ltd. Paternoster House, Charing Cross Road 1894 G^'^'^x^z PREFACE. Materials for a biography of Garrick overflow. Apart from the mass of letters edited in 1832 by Boaden, in two volumes, under the title of " The Private Correspondence of David Garrick," an im- mense amount of matter, much of it unedited and unused, is in the Forster Collection at South Ken- sington. These sources have been laid under contri- bution. Lives of Garrick have been written by Thomas Davies, the bookseller and actor (London, 2 vols., 1780, reprinted 1780, 178 1, 1784, and with notes by Stephen Jones, 1808) ; by Arthur Murphy, the dramatist (London, 2 vols., 8vo, 1801) ; by Boaden, prefixed to the correspondence mentioned above ; and by Mr. Percy Fitzgerald (London, 2 vols. life, long out of print, . Bvo, 1868). The last-named is inaccurate in some details, but is a work of much research and value, to which justice has not been done. What is almost a life is included in Forster's " Life and Times of Oliver Goldsmith " (London, 2 vols., 8vo, 1877, sixth edition). Shorter lives are •in existence in the "Dictionary of National Bio- graphy " and elsewhere. The literature and the memoirs of the second half of the last century are full of anecdote concerning Garrick or references to him. vi Preface. The chief difficulty of the biographer has been accordingly that of selection. Indebtedness in the compilation of the following monograph to the sources named, and especially to Mr. Percy Fitz- gerald, is fully acknowledged. Among those to whom a special debt is due, are Mr. Walter Herries Pollock, who has placed at the compiler's service materia] accumulated with a view to a work on Garrick which, unfortunately for the lovers of litera- ture and the stage, has not been written ; and Mr. Sketchley, the erudite and obliging Librarian of the Dyce and Forster Collection at South Kensington. Originally intended to form one of a series of lives of actors, the biography aims only at supplying the leading facts of Garrick's career, and makes no pre- tension to furnish full information concerning the scenes and characters amidst which he dwelt or to chronicle the stories that have been invented con- cerning him. 27, Camden Square, September, 1893. ERRATA. p. 56, 1. 6, after exist insert a full stop, p. 108, 1. 26, for Howard read Havard. p. 140, 1. (),for Fitzgerald read Fitzpatrick. p. 200, 1. tyfor Fitzgerald r«fli/ Fitzpatrick. g, 203, 1. 4, for couroune r^a^ couronne. DAVID GARRICK. CHAPTER I. Among those whom the repeal of the Edict of Nantes drove to seek shelter in England was a Huguenot gentleman of the name of David Garric, a member, it is said, of a noble family, De la Garrique, established near Saintonge, and connected by birth or marriage with the most illustrious families of L'An- goumois and Perigord. At the period of his flight David Garric was living in Bordeaux. So hard pressed was he in his efforts to escape that he left behind him his wife and child. By way of St. Malo he reached Guernsey, and on the 5th October, 1685, arrived in London. Here, two months later, he was joined by his wife, who, after escaping by sea from Bordeaux, had undergone imminent risk of ship- wreck and capture. Not until the 22nd May, 1687, were they gladdened by the arrival of their son Peter, an infant of two years, who came over in the charge of Mary or Marie Mongorier, a nurse. Other children were born to David Garric after his arrival in England, where he was joined by a brother and sister, fugitives like himself, who came to him from Rotterdam. Of the children born to David most B David Garrick. in died in infancy, his wife, whom he had married 1682, dying in 1694. Three, however, survived— David, Peter, who was put into the English army ; Portugal who took to the wine trade and settled in ; and Jane, who married an exile of the name of La Conde. Concerning the early career of Peter Garric history is all but silent, and the name of the regiment which he joined is unknown. All that is known is that the young officer, whose first commission is dated 1 2th May, 1706, was quartered in Lichfield, where he married, on the 13th November, 1707, a Miss Arabella Clough, a lady of Irish descent, the daughter of a vicar-choral of the cathedral in that city. Promotion followed, and before the birth of his first son, Peter, 24th September, 17 10, Peter Garric was a lieutenant. A daughter, Magdalene, arrived 29th April, 1715; and on 19th February, 17^, a second son, David. Captain Garrick was then quartered in Hereford on recruiting service, and it was in the Angel Inn, in that city, that David Garrick, the future actor, first saw the light. Nine days later he was christened at All Saints' Church, in the same city, the register giving the name Garrick, as it is now spelt. Other children followed: Jane, born ist April, 1718; William, 8 th March, 1720; George, 22nd August, 1723; and Merriall, 19th December, 1724; besides Daniel, Arabella, and Anna Maria, all of whom died in infancy. At ten years of age David was put into the David Garrick. Grammar School at Lichfield. The head-master of this establishment at that time was Hunter, a man the severity of whose discipline has been commemorated by Samuel Johnson, the immediate predecessor of Garrick. Johnson charges Hunter with brutality, and with failure to distinguish between want of knowledge and neglect of knowledge. Men of this stamp were common at this time, and for a century later. His capacity to teach was owned by Johnson, who more than once spoke of him as a good master. The under-masters were, moreover, men of ability, and the school, on the whole, contrasted favourably with most schools of its epoch. Young David was not, however, destined to enjoy an un- broken course of tuition. He had, as may be sup- posed, from the first, much vivacity and a certain amount of mimetic power. A bent to the stage was acquired while he was still in his first years at school. A visit was paid to Lichfield by a company of stroll- ing players, whose performances were witnessed by the boy. A result of their visit was an amateur per- formance, of which he was the director, of "The Recruiting Officer " of Farquhar. That this piece should have commended itself to a youth whose earliest recollections of his father were as a recruiting officer is natural. In the representation Garrick played Sergeant Kite. Who were Captain Plume and Captain Brazen, Worthy, Melinda, and Sylvia history does not record. Lucy, the chambermaid, was assigned to one of Garrick's sisters. As the per- formance is reported to have come off about 1727, B 2 4 David Garrick. when the Sergeant Kite was ten years old, it may any well have been his earliest . appearance upon stage. Not long afterwards an invitation for David Garrick was received from his uncle David, now established as a prosperous wine merchant in Lisbon, to join him for the purpose of learning the business. An offer such as this was too good not to meet with immediate acceptance from Captain Garrick, who had now exchanged into a marching regiment, the same, it is said, once commanded by the infamous Colonel Kirke, and who subsequently found himself compelled to go on half-pay. In Lisbon the success of young David appears to have been social rather than commercial. We hear of his declaiming to the English community speeches from plays, and delighting them with exhibitions of mimicry and sprightly sallies of various kinds. Some aristocratic acquaintances were contracted, and the youth records his intimacy with the Duke d'Aveiro, who subsequently, on the 13th January, 1759, was broken on the wheel and then burnt alive for con- spiracy. Neither now, however, nor when he subse- quently adopted it, had the profession of wine merchant much attraction for the mercurial youth, who was found too volatile for trade, and was sent back to resume his studies under Hunter. An opportunity of exchanging his half pay for full pay and foreign service now presented itself to the captain, who, in 1731, proceeded to Gibraltar, the garrison of which had been largely augmented. Upon his progress to London he was accompanied by Mrs. — David Garrick. Garrickj whose health at this period was infirm, and who was for some time unable to return to Lichfield. David now presents himself in an engaging light. He corresponded constantly with his father, supplying him with the domestic particulars which are of keenest interest to an exile, and displaying a gaiety of spirits and a keenness of perception not wholly removed from humour.
Recommended publications
  • Shearer West Phd Thesis Vol 1
    THE THEATRICAL PORTRAIT IN EIGHTEENTH CENTURY LONDON (VOL. I) Shearer West A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of St. Andrews 1986 Full metadata for this item is available in Research@StAndrews:FullText at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/2982 This item is protected by original copyright THE THEATRICAL PORTRAIT IN EIGHTEENTH CENTURY LONDON Ph.D. Thesis St. Andrews University Shearer West VOLUME 1 TEXT In submitting this thesis to the University of St. Andrews I understand that I am giving permission for it to be made available for use in accordance with the regulations of the University Library for the time being in force, subject to any copyright vested in the work not being affected thereby. I also understand that the title and abstract will be published, and that a copy of the I work may be made and supplied to any bona fide library or research worker. ABSTRACT A theatrical portrait is an image of an actor or actors in character. This genre was widespread in eighteenth century London and was practised by a large number of painters and engravers of all levels of ability. The sources of the genre lay in a number of diverse styles of art, including the court portraits of Lely and Kneller and the fetes galantes of Watteau and Mercier. Three types of media for theatrical portraits were particularly prevalent in London, between ca745 and 1800 : painting, print and book illustration.
    [Show full text]
  • Romeo Revived .Pdf
    McGirr, E. (2017). "What's in a Name?": Romeo and Juliet and the Cibber Brand. Shakespeare. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450918.2017.1406983 Peer reviewed version Link to published version (if available): 10.1080/17450918.2017.1406983 Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Taylor and Francis at http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17450918.2017.1406983. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research General rights This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/red/research-policy/pure/user-guides/ebr-terms/ Elaine M. McGirr Reader in Theatre & Performance Histories University of Bristol “What’s in a name?”: Romeo and Juliet and the Cibber brand Abstract: The 1744 and 1748/50 performances of Romeo and Juliet by Theophilus Cibber, Jenny Cibber and Susannah Cibber explain the significance of the play’s return to the repertory, uncover the history of rival interpretations of Juliet’s character, and make sense of the careers and reputations of the theatrical Cibbers. The “Cibberian” airs of all three Cibbers were markedly different, as were their interpretations of Shakespeare’s star-crossed lovers. Keywords: Shakespearean adaptation, performance history, celebrity, authorial reputation, repertory In Romeo and Juliet, Juliet apostrophizes Romeo to deny thy father and refuse thy name, assuring her (supposedly) absent lover that a rose by any other name would smell as sweet.
    [Show full text]
  • 1835. EXECUTIVE. *L POST OFFICE DEPARTMENT
    1835. EXECUTIVE. *l POST OFFICE DEPARTMENT. Persons employed in the General Post Office, with the annual compensation of each. Where Compen­ Names. Offices. Born. sation. Dol. cts. Amos Kendall..., Postmaster General.... Mass. 6000 00 Charles K. Gardner Ass't P. M. Gen. 1st Div. N. Jersey250 0 00 SelahR. Hobbie.. Ass't P. M. Gen. 2d Div. N. York. 2500 00 P. S. Loughborough Chief Clerk Kentucky 1700 00 Robert Johnson. ., Accountant, 3d Division Penn 1400 00 CLERKS. Thomas B. Dyer... Principal Book Keeper Maryland 1400 00 Joseph W. Hand... Solicitor Conn 1400 00 John Suter Principal Pay Clerk. Maryland 1400 00 John McLeod Register's Office Scotland. 1200 00 William G. Eliot.. .Chie f Examiner Mass 1200 00 Michael T. Simpson Sup't Dead Letter OfficePen n 1200 00 David Saunders Chief Register Virginia.. 1200 00 Arthur Nelson Principal Clerk, N. Div.Marylan d 1200 00 Richard Dement Second Book Keeper.. do.. 1200 00 Josiah F.Caldwell.. Register's Office N. Jersey 1200 00 George L. Douglass Principal Clerk, S. Div.Kentucky -1200 00 Nicholas Tastet Bank Accountant Spain. 1200 00 Thomas Arbuckle.. Register's Office Ireland 1100 00 Samuel Fitzhugh.., do Maryland 1000 00 Wm. C,Lipscomb. do : for) Virginia. 1000 00 Thos. B. Addison. f Record Clerk con-> Maryland 1000 00 < routes and v....) Matthias Ross f. tracts, N. Div, N. Jersey1000 00 David Koones Dead Letter Office Maryland 1000 00 Presley Simpson... Examiner's Office Virginia- 1000 00 Grafton D. Hanson. Solicitor's Office.. Maryland 1000 00 Walter D. Addison. Recorder, Div. of Acc'ts do..
    [Show full text]
  • Shakespeare and London Programme
    andShakespeare London A FREE EXHIBITION at London Metropolitan Archives from 28 May to 26 September 2013, including, at advertised times, THE SHAKESPEARE DEED A property deed signed by Mr. William Shakespeare, one of only six known examples of his signature. Also featuring documents from his lifetime along with maps, photographs, prints and models which explore his relationship with the great metropolis of LONDONHighlights will include the great panoramas of London by Hollar and Visscher, a wall of portraits of Mr Shakespeare, Mr. David Garrick’s signature, 16th century maps of the metropolis, 19th century playbills, a 1951 wooden model of The Globe Theatre and ephemera, performance recording and a gown from Shakespeare’s Globe. andShakespeare London In 1613 William Shakespeare purchased a property in Blackfriars, close to the Blackfriars Theatre and just across the river from the Globe Theatre. These were the venues used by The Kings Men (formerly the Lord Chamberlain’s Men) the performance group to which he belonged throughout most of his career. The counterpart deed he signed during the sale is one of the treasures we care for in the City of London’s collections and is on public display for the first time at London Metropolitan Archives. Celebrating the 400th anniversary of the document, this exhibition explores Shakespeare’s relationship with London through images, documents and maps drawn from the archives. From records created during his lifetime to contemporary performances of his plays, these documents follow the development of his work by dramatists and the ways in which the ‘bardologists’ have kept William Shakespeare alive in the fabric of the city through the centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • 'The Little-Ingenious Garrick and the Ingenious Little Hogarth'
    Video transcript 'The little-ingenious Garrick and the ingenious little Hogarth' Robin Smith Honorary Professor of English, University College London and William Chubb Actor The Queen’s Gallery, Buckingham Palace Wednesday, 23 April 2014 ROBIN SIMON: In July 1746 the great actor David Garrick wrote a reply to an invitation from the reverend John Hoadly – [CAPTION: The Revd John Hoadly (right) detail from double portrait with Dr Maurice Greene, 1747, National Portrait Gallery] WILLIAM CHUBB: Your invitation to the Old Alresford I most cordially accept of and the little ingenious Garrick with the ingenious little Hogarth will get up on a horseblock. Mount a couple of quadrupeds, or one if it carries double and high away to the reverend Rigdom Funnydose there to be merry, facetious, mad and nonsensical. ' ROBIN SIMON: Well they were certainly facetious. The house party acted, at least to their great enjoyment, what was described as a little bawdy play by Garrick, entitled Rag-and-jaw – rag and jaw. At this stage I think I ought to make one thing clear about Georgian life and humour, it’s, well how shall we put it, very down to earth. And so if you wish you may put your hands over your ears now. Rag-and-jaw is a skit upon the relationship between Brutus and Cassius in Julius Caesar, only now of course inevitably the characters are Brute-arse and Cassy-arse. I didn't say that Georgian, Georgian hjour was subtle. <Footer addr ess> Accompanied by Lucius, oh sorry Loose-arse. Garrick played Cassy-arse and the reverend John Hoadly was Brute-arse.
    [Show full text]
  • Black English in Britain in the Eighteenth Century
    Black English in Britain in the Eighteenth Century David Paisey for Ziggi Alexander and Audrey Dewjee Historians have added in various ways to our knowledge of the black presence in Britain during the eighteenth century, but one aspect has not figured largely in the accumulated evidence, namely records of how black people, a distinct underclass, spoke to each other and to all classes of the native white population. In a period long before sound recording, we are obviously dependent on written sources for indications of how lower-class groups spoke, that is to say their deviations in vocabulary, grammar, syntax and pronunciation from what we must call standard English, itself a construct from written sources. Accessible Court records from the period, of testimony by black defendants and witnesses, seem not to have been verbatim,1 and there is no key which might lead us to potential untapped sources in private manuscripts. It is also the case that works actually written and published by literate members of all ethnic groups generally aimed at the standard: this certainly applies to the published works of well- known black writers such as Ignatius Sancho (c. 1729-1780), Olaudah Equiano (c. 1745-1797), Ottobah Cugoano (c. 1757-after 1791) and the African-American Phyllis Wheatley (c. 1753- 1784). There are exceptions, however, in various works of imaginative literature by non-black writers, and these will provide all my evidence here. Amongst these, drama looms large, since the words given to some (though not all) of its black characters constitute an attempt to provide non-speakers of Black English (the actors of the day) with what must have been thought a believable likeness of the real thing.
    [Show full text]
  • A Room of His Own: a Literary-Cultural Study of Victorian Clubland
    &A Room of His Own A Literary-Cultural Study of Victorian Clubland B ARBARA BLACK ohio university press • athens Contents List of Illustrations vii Acknowledgments ix Prologue 1 Introduction The Man in the Club Window 5 Chapter 1 A Night at the Club 33 Chapter 2 Conduct Befitting a Gentleman Mid-Victorian Clubdom and the Novel 88 Chapter 3 Clubland’s Special Correspondents 112 Chapter 4 Membership Has Its Privileges The Imperial Clubman at Home and Away 147 Chapter 5 The Pleasure of Your Company in Late-Victorian Pall Mall 175 Chapter 6 A World of Men An Elegy for Clubbability 201 Epilogue A Room of Her Own 219 Notes 239 Bibliography 277 Index 293 v Illustrations P.1. “The Guys Who Look Remarkably Alike Club,” by Hilgerdt, 2007 4 I.1. “The Man in the Club Window,” frontispiece for Hogg’s Habits of Good Society, 1859 13 I.2. Frequency of use of club and gentlemen’s club, 1800–2000 29 1.1. Travellers’ Pie recipe 35 1.2. Cotelettes de Mouton à la Reform recipe 35 1.3. Garrick Club Beefsteak dinner menu, 1890 36 1.4. Garrick Club dinner menu featuring turtle soup, 1899 37 1.5. Garrick Club dinner bill of James Christie, 1892 38 1.6. Garrick Club dinner bill of James Christie, 1891 39 1.7. Garrick Club dinner bill of Mr. Kemble, 1893 39 1.8. Illustrated Garrick Club house dinner menu, 1913 40 1.9. Garrick Club menu card (autographed), 1880 41 1.10. “The Smoking Room at the Club,” by Doyle, 1862 43 1.11.
    [Show full text]
  • Linley Sambourne's Diary 1898
    LINLEY SAMBOURNE'S DIARY 1898 Entries in front of Diary: Mrs Annie Hall Morgan, 96 Beaufort St, Elm Park Gardens. F. MODELS ADDRESS. (Derben) Mrs K Lawford, 112 George's Road, Newcastle on Tyne. Marie Bowey, 75 Disraeli Road, Putney. Tall very pretty model age 20. Kitty Linnington, 17 Danvers St, Paulton Square, Chelsea. Aged 17. Dark girl, good looking. Good figure. L.Cooke, 21. 2 Thanet Street, Euston Road. Tall, fair, good looking, good figure. Also sister age 19. Tall, fair, slim. A.E.Green, 3 Queens Buildings, High St, Cheltenham. L.G.Griffin, 5 Park Crescent Mews West. P.P. L.Jessop, Holly Lodge, Forest Rd, Walthamstow. Auguste Mani, 19 Adelaide Road, Richmond S.W. A. Fletcher, 60 Frederick St, Grays Inn Road. Annie Price (age 22) 2 Goodson Rd, Fulham. Mrs Sands, 82 Gloucester Terrace W. L.Griffin, Weaveland Road, Tisbury, Wilts. 1 Montpelier Row, Knightsbridge S.W. Daisy Williams, 3 Winchester Terrace, Putney. 19 Clonmore Street, Southfields, S.W. C.Powell, 27 Rupert St, Shaftesbury Avenue. C.Richards, 48 Achilles Rd, Fortune Green, West Hampstead, N.W. or Bolson Rd. 19 Bolton Road, Abbey Rd, N.W. S.Bakewell, Burlington Hotel. RAILWAY MANAGERS. Joe Wilkinson, Genl Manager G.W.Rly. J.Gooday, new Manager, L.B & S.C Rly. C.I.Owens Esqre, London & S.W.Rly, General Managers Off, H.Liddell Esqr, Waterloo St, S.E. W.R.Stevens Esqre, S.E.Rly Secretary's & Chief Office London Bridge Station S.E. C.Sheath, Depy Secy. The Decorations Company, 10 Green St, Leicester Square. Met at the Hickmans, 1st May; M.A.
    [Show full text]
  • The English-Speaking Aristophanes and the Languages of Class Snobbery 1650-1914
    Pre-print of Hall, E. in Aristophanes in Performance (Legenda 2005) The English-Speaking Aristophanes and the Languages of Class Snobbery 1650-1914 Edith Hall Introduction In previous chapters it has been seen that as early as the 1650s an Irishman could use Aristophanes to criticise English imperialism, while by the early 19th century the possibility was being explored in France of staging a topical adaptation of Aristophanes. In 1817, moreover, Eugene Scribe could base his vaudeville show Les Comices d’Athènes on Ecclesiazusae. Aristophanes became an important figure for German Romantics, including Hegel, after Friedrich von Schlegel had in 1794 published his fine essay on the aesthetic value of Greek comedy. There von Schlegel proposed that the Romantic ideals of Freedom and Joy (Freiheit, Freude) are integral to all art; since von Schlegel regarded comedy as containing them to the highest degree, for him it was the most democratic of all art forms. Aristophanic comedy made a fundamental contribution to his theory of a popular genre with emancipatory potential. One result of the philosophical interest in Aristophanes was that in the early decades of the 18th century, until the 1848 revolution, the German theatre itself felt the impact of the ancient comic writer: topical Lustspiele displayed interest in his plays, which provided a model for German poets longing for a political comedy, for example the remarkable satirical trilogy Napoleon by Friedrich Rückert (1815-18). This international context illuminates the experiences undergone by Aristophanic comedy in England, and what became known as Britain consequent upon the 1707 Act of Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Why This? the Quarterly Newsletter of the University Club of Toronto
    The quarterly newsletter of the University Club of Toronto September, 2016 Editor: Donald Rumball As the quartet’s residency coincides with their project to perform all of Beethoven’s string quartets, we are the beneficiaries of an extraordinary learning opportunity. Prior to each concert, the quartet introduces us to the music we are about to hear by playing extracts and illustrating how the piece is put together. They show us how experimental Beethoven was in his time, and how startlingly modern some of his work still sounds. We also get a sense of how the quartet functions as individual voices within the strict discipline of the string quartet idiom, giving credence to a comment often attributed to Goethe, “One hears four intelligent people conversing with one another, and believes one might learn something from their discourse.” Tapestry Opera We will continue to collaborate with Tapestry Opera, who presented two opera evenings last season: one featuring opera Diana Wiley introducing the New Orford String Quartet stars mezzo-soprano Krisztina Szabó and tenor David at a concert held in the lounge Pomeroy, who filled the Library with thrilling sounds in an evening of best-loved opera arias; and the other a working Music programming @uct rehearsal with the full orchestra and cast of a brand new opera that was performed to critical acclaim a week later. By Diana Wiley Over the past few years, we have been building an exceptional Jazz evenings music program, with classical, opera and jazz concerts Part of the fun of the music evenings is that they include performed by world class musicians.
    [Show full text]
  • Translating Allusions: the Case of Dubliners by James Joyce / S
    590 / RumeliDE Journal of Language and Literature Studies 2020.18 (March) Translating allusions: The case of Dubliners by James Joyce / S. Tekalp (pp. 590-609) Translating allusions: The case of Dubliners by James Joyce1 Selen TEKALP2 APA: Tekalp, S. (2020). Translating allusions: The case of Dubliners by James Joyce. RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, (18), 590-609. DOI: 10.29000/rumelide.706407 Abstract Intertextuality refers to the relation of a text to other texts. Although the notion has connections with many fields of art such as painting, sculpture, architecture, cinema and theatre, in this study it is examined as a literary concept within the framework of translation studies. Intertextual devices such as quotations, citations and allusions pose great challenge for translators as they require an extensive cultural knowledge and an awareness of the extratextual relations of the text. These relations can be built by author’s use of allusions, quotations, translation, pastiche, parody and other intertextual elements. However, the analysis of all these elements seems to be compelling for a translator. Therefore, to investigate how intertextuality is treated in the Turkish translations of Dubliners, the scope has been restricted to the allusions. Allusion is described as an indirect reference to a literary work, a person, place or thing that is already known. In Dubliners, Joyce uses multiple allusions dedicated to literary texts, historical and political figures and events. The case study has been carried out by examining the allusions separately in all fifteen stories within the book. After that, the Turkish translations performed by Murat Belge and Merve Tokmakçıoğlu were analysed, and the Turkish counterparts of the detected allusions were listed for each story.
    [Show full text]
  • Furbish'd Remnants
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles “Furbish’d Remnants”: Theatrical Adaptation and the Orient, 1660-1815 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in English by Angelina Marie Del Balzo 2019 Ó Copyright by Angelina Marie Del Balzo 2019 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION “Furbish’d Remnants”: Theatrical Adaptation and the Orient, 1660-1815 by Angelina Marie Del Balzo Doctor of Philosophy in English University of California, Los Angeles, 2019 Professor Felicity A. Nussbaum, Chair Furbish’d Remnants argues that eighteenth-century theatrical adaptations set in the Orient destabilize categories of difference, introducing Oriental characters as subjects of sympathy while at the same time defamiliarizing the people and space of London. Applying contemporary theories of emotion, I contend that in eighteenth-century theater, the actor and the character become distinct subjects for the affective transfer of sympathy, increasing the emotional potential of performance beyond the narrative onstage. Adaptation as a form heightens this alienation effect, by drawing attention to narrative’s properties as an artistic construction. A paradox at the heart of eighteenth-century theater is that while the term “adaptation” did not have a specific literary or theatrical definition until near the end of the period, in practice adaptations and translations proliferated on the English stage. Anticipating Linda Hutcheon’s postmodernist theory of adaptation, eighteenth-century playwrights and performers conceptualized adaptation as both process and product. Adaptation created a narrative mode that emphasized the process and labor of performance for audiences in order to create a higher level of engagement with ii audiences.
    [Show full text]