DOCSLIB.ORG

Recent Supercomputing Development in Japan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Recent Supercomputing Development in Japan Development of Supercomputers in Japan --From the Numerical Wind Tunnel to Fugaku-- Yoshio Oyanagi Science Advisor, RIST Kobe Center （高度情報科学技術研究機構） 2019/9/5 KSC 2019 1 How computers started in Japan PREHISTORY 2019/9/5 KSC 2019 2 “Computers” before WWII • Many Powers/Hollerith Punch Card Systems have been introduced to Japan since 1923 • The first one in universities: IBM Punch Card Systems in Kobe Univ. in 1941 • Since no PCS could be imported during WWII, Japan tried to copy the machine. • The next slide shows computer history exhibit of Kobe Univ. RIEB (Res. Inst. for Economics and Business Administration) . 2019/9/5 KSC 2019 3 2019/9/5 KSC 2019 4 Universities in 1950’s and 1960’s • Big computers were too expensive to buy with ordinary budget (we were poor, then!) • Some universities introduced small computers • Some universities developed computers by themselves – TAC 1952-1959 Univ. of Tokyo (Eng.) (with Toshiba) V – (no name) 1953-unfinished Osaka Univ. V – PC-1 1956- 1958 Univ. of Tokyo (Sci.) P – KDC-1 1958-1960 Kyoto Univ. (with Hitachi) T – SENAC-1 1956-1958 Tohoku Univ. (with NEC) P – K-1 1958-1960 Keio Univ. T • Those computers were open to teachers and students in the campus and were heavily used 2019/9/5 KSC 2019 5 PC-1 in Univ. of Tokyo (hand made) 2019/9/5 KSC 2019 6 Authorized Computer Centers • 1963/5/13 Recommendation of Science Council of Japan • 1963/7 Budget Proposal from Univ. of Tokyo • 1964/3 Accepted by government • Finalist computers were: – Hitachi HITAC 5020 (under development) – IBM 7094 II (popular but out-of-date) – CDC 3600 (new in Japan) • 1964/5 Committee selected HITAC 5020 – Rejected American computers 2019/9/5 KSC 2019 7 Computer Center, Univ. of Tokyo • 1965/4 Inauguration • 1965/7 Installed (main- and subsystems) • 1966/1 Service started (closed card system) • 1966/11 Main system was upgraded to HITAC 5020E 2019/9/5 KSC 2019 8 Seven Computer Centers Before 1971, seven centers started • Tohoku Univ.: NEAC 2200-500 • Kyoto Univ.: FACOM 230-60 • Osaka Univ.: NEAC 2200-200 • Kyushu Univ. : FACOM 230-60 • Hokkaido Univ. : FACOM 230-60 • Nagoya Univ.: FACOM 230-60 All were open to all teachers/staffs/graduate students in Japan They were upgraded every 4-6 years 2019/9/5 KSC 2019 9 In 1976 first Cray-1 was installed in LANL. We heard the news that computers with high speed were working in US, unfortunately they were beyond our reach. Japanese vendors tried to follow the Cray vector computers. FROM MAINFRAMES TO SUPERCOMPUTERS 2019/9/5 KSC 2019 10 75 80 85 90 95 00 05 0 I II III IV V Cray-1 205, XMP ETA10,YMP C90 T90 X1 Illiac IV CM-2 CM-5,Paragon SP-1/2, T3D T3E, Origin, Power APU, IAP S810 S820 S3800 SR2201/8000/11000 VP200 VP2600 VPP500 VPP300/700/5000 PP SX-1/2 SX-3 SX4 SX-5 SX-6/7/8 PAX-32 QCDPAX cp-pacs pacs-cs NWT ES MITI Supercomputer RWCP Project Fifth Generation Project 2019/9/5 KSC 2019 11 Historical Overview of Supercomputers ⚫ 1H of 1980’s: Japanese vectors comparable with American vectors ⚫ 2H of 1980’s: Japanese vectors supersede Americans. Trade conflicts (NCAR, MIT etc.) begin. ⚫ 1H of 1990’s: HPCC, NII start. MPP with Killer micros. Japan keeps vector architecture like NWT. ⚫ 2H of 1990’s: ASCI, PACI, PITAC in US ⚫ 1H of 2000’s: ES (“Computonik”), BG/L ⚫ 2H of 2000’s: Death and resurrection of the K. ASC, SciDAC, Teragrid and HPCS in US 2019/9/5 KSC 2019 12 ◆ ◆ 2019/9/5 KSC 2019 13 Observation (1/2) • Until late 1990’s, Japanese vendors focused to vector machines. • Users exploited the power of vectorization. • Vendors thought parallel machines were for specialized purposes (eg. image processing). Most users dared not try to harness parallel machines in the 80’s. • Users found difficulties in using message passing. • Softwares – Very good vectorizing compilers. – Users were spoiled by them. – HPF efforts for the Earth Simulator. 2019/9/5 KSC 2019 14 Observations (2/2) • Some computer scientists were interested in building parallel machines, but they were not used for practical scientific computing. • Practical parallel processing for scientific computing was started by application users: – qcd-pax (1989) for lattice QCD – NWT (1993) for fluid dynamics – cp-pacs (1996) for computational physics – GRAPE’s (1989- ) for astrophysics – Earth Simulator (2002) for climate, ocean, earthquake 2019/9/5 KSC 2019 15 Installation of SC’s in Japan (1987-8) • Cray Research (Cray-1, X-MP):10 (8 in com) • ETA (ETA-10): 1 • Hitachi (S810):15 (9 in com) • NEC (SX-1/2):7 (2 in com) • Fujitsu (VP-50, 100, 200, 400):36 (23 in com) – com: commercial sector (more than half) 2019/9/5 KSC 2019 16 US-Japan Trade Conflicts • 1985/9: Plaza Accord (G5) in NY • 1985: SX-2 was cancelled by NCAR after bidding • 1986/9: US-Japan Semiconductor Agreement • 1987: Japanese SC was cancelled by MIT after bidding 2019/9/5 KSC 2019 17 Super 301 Act • In 1989, US government decided to apply “Super 301 Act” (Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988) to Japan and identified three items including supercomputers. • Washington pressured Japanese governmental institutions to purchase US supercomputers. (Titech ETA10, ETL X-MP) • On the other hand, US governmental institutions had no Japanese supercomputers at all (yet now!). 2019/9/5 KSC 2019 18 HPCC in US • Blue Book (1991/2, G.W.Bush) – “Grand Challenges: High Performance Computing and Communications” • The High Performance Computing Act of 1991 • Trade conflicts: – “Japan should buy more US supers” (M. Kantor, 1993/4) Otherwise, possible retaliation. – 6 out of 11 in public sector bought US machines in the 1994 supplementary budget. • In Europe, Rubbia Report (1991/1) – European Teraflop Initiative 2019/9/5 KSC 2019 19 Japanese machines in Top 20 9306 9311 9406 9411 9506 9511 9606 9611 9706 9711 9806 9811 9906 9911 0006 0011 0106 0111 1 NWT NWT NWT NWT Todai cp-p 2 NWT NWT NWT cp-p 3 Todai NWT 4 Todai cp-p Todai 5 NEC ATP ATP KEK KEK Todai LRZ Todai 6 AES NEC Tsuku Tsuk Todai cp-p KEK 7 AES Riken Riken JAERI KEK NWT LRZ Todai 8 KEK ECMW Osak 9 NEC Kyush Todai KEK 10 Hitach Hitac NEC ECMW 11 Todai Todai JAERI Stutt 12 NEC Nagoy AES TAC ECMW LRZ Osak 13 Toho Toho Todai 14 ATP Gene JAERI Todai cp-p KEK 15 AES Tsuk ISS Nagoy NWT Kyoto 16 NEC Riken ECMW 17 Toho Toho Gene NEC Kyush TAC ISS Todai LRZ 18 AES Toho ISS Osaka KEK AES cp-p JMA 19 IMS AES ATP Osaka ECMW FZJ KEK 20 IMS Tsuk Stutt 2019/9/5 KSC 2019 20 US Trends in late 1990’s • ASCI Project (originally 1995-2004) – SC’s in LANL, LLNL, SNL – Red (1+), Blue (3+), White (10+), Q(30+), Purple (100+) --- every 2 years • PITAC (I:1997-2001, II: 2003-2005) – IT2 project • PACI (1997-2004) • Petaflops I in Pasadena (1994) Petaflops II in Santa Barbara (1999) 2019/9/5 KSC 2019 21 Japan Trends in early 2000’s • 2nd Five-year plan for science and technology (2001) • IT Strategic Headquarter (2001): e-Japan, but only network was emphasized. – At this stage, level up of supercomputers was to be promoted according to the needs of each field (not a national project). • Earth Simulator attained 36 Tflops (2002) • Information Science and Technology committee in Mext has been discussing the measures to promote computational science and technology since August 2004. 2019/9/5 KSC 2019 22 US Trends in early 2000’s • DOE: ASCI continues – BlueGene and Red Storm added – SciDAC (2001) • NSF: Teragrid (2001-15) • DOD: HPCS (High Productivity Computing Systems) – 2002: Phase I (IBM, Cray, Sun, HP, SGI) – 2003: Phase II (Cray, IBM, Sun) – 2006: Phase III (Cray: XC, IBM: PERCS) • HEC Revitalization Act of 2004 and 2005 • Exa started in “The Path to Extreme Computing” in Santa Fe (2004/10) 2019/9/5 KSC 2019 23 Sixth Generation (2H of 2000 and later) Japan US/Europe/China • 2006-12: K Computer P. • Cray XT/XE/XC – 2011: 10 PF attained • 2005: ASCI Purple (LLNL, IBM) • 2006: T2K open SC • 2006: Rangers (TACC) • 2007: NCSA, BlueWaters started – 2008: installed in 3 univ. (IBM→2011 Cray) • 2006: TSUBAME 1.0 • 2007: Kraken (Tennessee) – 2010: TSUBAME 2.0 • 2008: Roadrunner (LANL) • 2009: Fujitsu fx-1 to JAXA • 2010: Tianhe-1A (NUDT) • 2010: PRACE started • 2011: NSF, SXEDE • 2013 America COMPETES Act 2019/9/5 KSC 2019 24 After 5 consecutive top ranks of ES, Japan fell far behind. 0206 0211 0306 0311 0406 0411 0506 0511 0606 0611 0706 0711 0806 0811 0906 0911 1006 1 ES ES ES ES ES 2 3 ES 4 ES 5 6 NAL ES 7 Riken TIT 8 AIST 9 TIT 10 ES 11 JAXA 12 AIST 13 Todai TIT 14 LRZ Riken ES 15 JAERI AIST TIT Todai 16 17 KEK 18 KEK 19 Osak AIST 20 ES Tsuk 2019/9/5 KSC 2019 25 Most politicians thought “IT is network” (not HPC) Supercomputers were considered something like an F1 race car, a hobby of computer scientists. It was not easy to persuade them of the importance of supercomputers. HOW “K” COMPUTER WAS BORN 2019/9/5 KSC 2019 26 History of the K Computer • Recommendation to a Mext committee (2005): – Promote a national project to construct a leading edge supercomputer – Government decision (July 25, 2005) • Riken started the project (October 2005) • Mext funded four projects to promote “Element Technologies for Future Supercomputers” in 2005- 2007.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • File System and Power Management Enhanced for Supercomputer Fugaku
    File System and Power Management Enhanced for Supercomputer Fugaku Hideyuki Akimoto Takuya Okamoto Takahiro Kagami Ken Seki Kenichirou Sakai Hiroaki Imade Makoto Shinohara Shinji Sumimoto RIKEN and Fujitsu are jointly developing the supercomputer Fugaku as the successor to the K computer with a view to starting public use in FY2021. While inheriting the software assets of the K computer, the plan for Fugaku is to make improvements, upgrades, and functional enhancements in various areas such as computational performance, efficient use of resources, and ease of use. As part of these changes, functions in the file system have been greatly enhanced with a focus on usability in addition to improving performance and capacity beyond that of the K computer. Additionally, as reducing power consumption and using power efficiently are issues common to all ultra-large-scale computer systems, power management functions have been newly designed and developed as part of the up- grading of operations management software in Fugaku. This article describes the Fugaku file system featuring significantly enhanced functions from the K computer and introduces new power management functions. 1. Introduction application development environment are taken up in RIKEN and Fujitsu are developing the supercom- separate articles [1, 2], this article focuses on the file puter Fugaku as the successor to the K computer and system and operations management software. The are planning to begin public service in FY2021. file system provides a high-performance and reliable The Fugaku is composed of various kinds of storage environment for application programs and as- system software for supporting the execution of su- sociated data.
    [Show full text]
  • Xinya (Leah) Zhao Abdulahi Abu Outline
    K-Computer Xinya (Leah) Zhao Abdulahi Abu Outline • History of Supercomputing • K-Computer Architecture • Programming Environment • Performance Evaluation • What's next? Timeline of Supercomputing Control Data The Cray era Massive Processing Petaflop Computing Corporation (1960s) (mid-1970s - 1980s) (1990s) (21st century) • CDC 1604 (1960): First • 80 MHz Cray-1 (1976): • Hitachi SR2201 (1996): • Realization: Power of solid state The most successful used 2048 processors large number of small • CDC 6600 (1964): 100 supercomputers in history connected via a fast three processors can be computers were sold at $8 • Vector processor dimensioanl corssbar harnessed to achieve high million each • Introduced chaining in network performance • Gained speed by "farming which scalar and vector • ASCI Red: mesh-based • IBM Blue Gene out" work to peripheral registers generate interim MIMD massively parallel architecture: trades computing elements, results system with over 9,000 processor speed for low freeing the CPU to • The Cray-2 (1985): No compute nodes and well power consumption, so a process actual data chaning and high memory over 12 terabytes of disk large number of • STAR-100: First to use latency with deep storage processors can be used at vector processing pipelinging • ASCI Red was the first air cooled temperature ever to break through the • K computer (2011) : 1 teraflop barrier fastest in the world K Computer is #1 !!! Why K Computer? Purpose: • Perform extremely complex mathematical or scientific calculations (ex: modelling the changes
    [Show full text]
  • Toho Co., Ltd. Agenda
    License Sales Sheet October 2018 TOHO CO., LTD. AGENDA 1. About GODZILLA 2. Key Factors 3. Plan & Schedule 4. Merchandising Portfolio Appendix: TOHO at Glance 1. About GODZILLA About GODZILLA | What is GODZILLA? “Godzilla” began as a Jurassic creature evolving from sea reptile to terrestrial beast, awakened by mankind’s thermonuclear tests in the inaugural film. Over time, the franchise itself has evolved, as Godzilla and other creatures appearing in Godzilla films have become a metaphor for social commentary in the real world. The characters are no longer mere entertainment icons but embody emotions and social problems of the times. 2018 © TOHO CO., LTD. All rights reserved/ Confidential & Proprietary 4 About GODZILLA | Filmography Reigning the Kaiju realm for over half a century and prevailing strong --- With its inception in 1954, the GODZILLA movie franchise has brought more than 30 live-action feature films to the world and continues to inspire filmmakers and creators alike. Ishiro Honda’s “GODZILLA”81954), a classic monster movie that is widely regarded as a masterpiece in film, launched a character franchise that expanded over 50 years with 29 titles in total. Warner Bros. and Legendary in 2014 had reintroduced the GODZILLA character to global audience. It contributed to add millennials to GODZILLA fan base as well as regained attention from generations who were familiar with original series. In 2017, the character has made a transition into new media- animated feature. TOHO is producing an animated trilogy to be streamed in over 190 countries on NETFLIX. 2018 © TOHO CO., LTD. All rights reserved/ Confidential & Proprietary 5 Our 360° Business Film Store TV VR/AR Cable Promotion Bluray G DVD Product Exhibition Publishing Event Music 2018 © TOHO CO., LTD.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogen and Fuel Cells in Japan
    HYDROGEN AND FUEL CELLS IN JAPAN JONATHAN ARIAS Tokyo, October 2019 EU-Japan Centre for Industrial Cooperation ABOUT THE AUTHOR Jonathan Arias is a Mining Engineer (Energy and Combustibles) with an Executive Master in Renewable Energies and a Master in Occupational Health and Safety Management. He has fourteen years of international work experience in the energy field, with several publications, and more than a year working in Japan as an energy consultant. He is passionate about renewable energies, energy transition technologies, electric and fuel cell vehicles, and sustainability. He also published a report about “Solar Energy, Energy Storage and Virtual Power Plants in Japan” that can be considered the first part of this document and is available in https://lnkd.in/ff8Fc3S. He can be reached on LinkedIn and at [email protected]. ABOUT THE EU-JAPAN CENTRE FOR INDUSTRIAL COOPERATION The EU-Japan Centre for Industrial Cooperation (http://www.eu-japan.eu/) is a unique venture between the European Commission and the Japanese Government. It is a non-profit organisation established as an affiliate of the Institute of International Studies and Training (https://www.iist.or.jp/en/). It aims at promoting all forms of industrial, trade and investment cooperation between the EU and Japan and at improving EU and Japanese companies’ competitiveness and cooperation by facilitating exchanges of experience and know-how between EU and Japanese businesses. (c) Iwatani Corporation kindly allowed the use of the image on the title page in this document. Table of Contents Table of Contents ......................................................................................................................... I List of Figures ............................................................................................................................ III List of Tables ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • (52) Cont~Ol Data
    C) (52) CONT~OL DATA literature and Distribution Services ~~.) 308 North Dale Street I st. Paul. Minnesota 55103 rJ 1 August 29, 1983 "r--"-....." (I ~ __ ,I Dear Customer: Attached is the third (3) catalog supplement since the 1938 catalog was published . .. .·Af ~ ~>J if-?/t~--62--- G. F. Moore, Manager Literature & Distribution Services ,~-" l)""... ...... I _._---------_._----_._----_._-------- - _......... __ ._.- - LOS CATALOG SUPPLEPtENT -- AUGUST 1988 Pub No. Rev [Page] TITLE' [ extracted from catalog entry] Bind Price + = New Publication r = Revision - = Obsolete r 15190060 [4-07] FULL SCREEN EDITOR (FSEDIT) RM (NOS 1 & 2) .......•...•.•...•••........... 12.00 r 15190118 K [4-07] NETWORK JOB ENTRY FACILITY (NJEF) IH8 (NOS 2) ........................... 5.00 r 15190129 F [4-07] NETWORK JOB ENTRY FACILITY (NJEF) RM (NOS 2) .........•.......•........... + 15190150 C [4-07] NETWORK TRANSFER FACILITY (NTF) USAGE (NOS/VE) .......................... 15.00 r 15190762 [4-07] TIELINE/NP V2 IHB (L642) (NOS 2) ........................................ 12.00 r 20489200 o [4-29] WREN II HALF-HEIGHT 5-114" DISK DRIVE ................................... + 20493400 [4-20] CDCNET DEVICE INTERFACE UNITS ........................................... + 20493600 [4-20] CDCNET ETHERNET EQUIPMENT ............................................... r 20523200 B [4-14] COMPUTER MAINTENANCE SERVICES - DEC ..................................... r 20535300 A [4-29] WREN II 5-1/4" RLL CERTIFIED ............................................ r 20537300 A [4-18] SOFTWARE
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial Report (C) JETRO Japan Economic Monthly, August 2005
    Industrial Report (C) JETRO Japan Economic Monthly, August 2005 Trends in the Pharmaceutical Industry Japanese Economy Division Summary The nature of Japan’s pharmaceutical market is changing. The market for generic drugs in Japan has been expanding in recent years. Major Japanese pharmaceutical companies have undertaken mergers and restructuring, and an increasing number of foreign pharmaceutical companies have entered the Japanese market recently by establishing joint ventures with Japanese drug companies or granting distribution rights for their products to Japanese firms. 1. Market Overview The Japanese pharmaceutical industry, buoyed by a rise in income levels and growing awareness about hygiene after World War II, has grown gradually in line with Japanese industry. The introduction of universal health insurance coverage in April 1961 triggered a soaring increase in domestic demand for medicines. The brisk development of new medicines based on technologies introduced from the West has enabled the industry to respond more quickly to market needs. As a result, the Japanese pharmaceutical industry is now second only to that of the United States. In recent years, however, Fig. 1-1 Japanese Market Share of Generic Drugs (GE/total drugs) the financial situation (%) Value Quantity basis surrounding health insurance has (Drug price basis) become strained due to increasing 1999 4.7 10.8 medical costs shouldered by the 20024.8 12.2 2003 5.2 16.4 government, owing to the aging Source: Japan Generic Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association population, advances in medical Fig. 1-2 Market Shares of Generic Drugs in Main Countries technology and the development (2002) of new medical equipment.
    [Show full text]
  • Parallelization Hardware Architecture Type to Enter Text
    Parallelization Hardware architecture Type to enter text Delft University of Technology Challenge the future Contents • Introduction • Classification of systems • Topology • Clusters and Grid • Fun Hardware 2 hybrid parallel vector superscalar scalar 3 Why Parallel Computing Primary reasons: • Save time • Solve larger problems • Provide concurrency (do multiple things at the same time) Classification of HPC hardware • Architecture • Memory organization 5 1st Classification: Architecture • There are several different methods used to classify computers • No single taxonomy fits all designs • Flynn's taxonomy uses the relationship of program instructions to program data • SISD - Single Instruction, Single Data Stream • SIMD - Single Instruction, Multiple Data Stream • MISD - Multiple Instruction, Single Data Stream • MIMD - Multiple Instruction, Multiple Data Stream 6 Flynn’s Taxonomy • SISD: single instruction and single data stream: uniprocessor • SIMD: vector architectures: lower flexibility • MISD: no commercial multiprocessor: imagine data going through a pipeline of execution engines • MIMD: most multiprocessors today: easy to construct with off-the-shelf computers, most flexibility 7 SISD • One instruction stream • One data stream • One instruction issued on each clock cycle • One instruction executed on single element(s) of data (scalar) at a time • Traditional ‘von Neumann’ architecture (remember from introduction) 8 SIMD • Also von Neumann architectures but more powerful instructions • Each instruction may operate on more than one data element • Usually intermediate host executes program logic and broadcasts instructions to other processors • Synchronous (lockstep) • Rating how fast these machines can issue instructions is not a good measure of their performance • Two major types: • Vector SIMD • Parallel SIMD 9 Vector SIMD • Single instruction results in multiple operands being updated • Scalar processing operates on single data elements.
    [Show full text]
  • UNICOS® Installation Guide for CRAY J90lm Series SG-5271 9.0.2
    UNICOS® Installation Guide for CRAY J90lM Series SG-5271 9.0.2 / ' Cray Research, Inc. Copyright © 1996 Cray Research, Inc. All Rights Reserved. This manual or parts thereof may not be reproduced in any form unless permitted by contract or by written permission of Cray Research, Inc. Portions of this product may still be in development. The existence of those portions still in development is not a commitment of actual release or support by Cray Research, Inc. Cray Research, Inc. assumes no liability for any damages resulting from attempts to use any functionality or documentation not officially released and supported. If it is released, the final form and the time of official release and start of support is at the discretion of Cray Research, Inc. Autotasking, CF77, CRAY, Cray Ada, CRAYY-MP, CRAY-1, HSX, SSD, UniChem, UNICOS, and X-MP EA are federally registered trademarks and CCI, CF90, CFr, CFr2, CFT77, COS, Cray Animation Theater, CRAY C90, CRAY C90D, Cray C++ Compiling System, CrayDoc, CRAY EL, CRAY J90, Cray NQS, CraylREELlibrarian, CraySoft, CRAY T90, CRAY T3D, CrayTutor, CRAY X-MP, CRAY XMS, CRAY-2, CRInform, CRIlThrboKiva, CSIM, CVT, Delivering the power ..., DGauss, Docview, EMDS, HEXAR, lOS, LibSci, MPP Apprentice, ND Series Network Disk Array, Network Queuing Environment, Network Queuing '!boIs, OLNET, RQS, SEGLDR, SMARTE, SUPERCLUSTER, SUPERLINK, Trusted UNICOS, and UNICOS MAX are trademarks of Cray Research, Inc. Anaconda is a trademark of Archive Technology, Inc. EMASS and ER90 are trademarks of EMASS, Inc. EXABYTE is a trademark of EXABYTE Corporation. GL and OpenGL are trademarks of Silicon Graphics, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Through the Years… When Did It All Begin?
    & Through the years… When did it all begin? 1974? 1978? 1963? 2 CDC 6600 – 1974 NERSC started service with the first Supercomputer… ● A well-used system - Serial Number 1 ● On its last legs… ● Designed and built in Chippewa Falls ● Launch Date: 1963 ● Load / Store Architecture ● First RISC Computer! ● First CRT Monitor ● Freon Cooled ● State-of-the-Art Remote Access at NERSC ● Via 4 acoustic modems, manually answered capable of 10 characters /sec 3 50th Anniversary of the IBM / Cray Rivalry… Last week, CDC had a press conference during which they officially announced their 6600 system. I understand that in the laboratory developing this system there are only 32 people, “including the janitor”… Contrasting this modest effort with our vast development activities, I fail to understand why we have lost our industry leadership position by letting someone else offer the world’s most powerful computer… T.J. Watson, August 28, 1963 4 2/6/14 Cray Higher-Ed Roundtable, July 22, 2013 CDC 7600 – 1975 ● Delivered in September ● 36 Mflop Peak ● ~10 Mflop Sustained ● 10X sustained performance vs. the CDC 6600 ● Fast memory + slower core memory ● Freon cooled (again) Major Innovations § 65KW Memory § 36.4 MHz clock § Pipelined functional units 5 Cray-1 – 1978 NERSC transitions users ● Serial 6 to vector architectures ● An fairly easy transition for application writers ● LTSS was converted to run on the Cray-1 and became known as CTSS (Cray Time Sharing System) ● Freon Cooled (again) ● 2nd Cray 1 added in 1981 Major Innovations § Vector Processing § Dependency
    [Show full text]
  • DE86 006665 Comparison of the CRAY X-MP-4, Fujitsu VP-200, And
    Distribution Category: Mathematics and Computers General (UC-32) ANL--85-1 9 DE86 006665 ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY 9700 South Cass Avenue Argonne, Illinois 60439 Comparison of the CRAY X-MP-4, Fujitsu VP-200, and Hitachi S-810/20: An Argonne Perspcctive Jack J. Dongarra Mathematics and Computer Science Division and Alan Hinds Computing Services October 1985 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency o h ntdSae Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency of the United States employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes ancy thereof, nor any of their bility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any informany legal liability or responsi- process disclosed, or represents that its use would nyinformation, apparatus, product, or ence enceherinherein tooay any specificcomriseii commercial rdt not infringe privately owned rights. Refer- product, process, or service by trade name, trademak manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply itsenrme, r ark, mendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any ag endorsement, recom- and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily st agency thereof. The views United States Government or any agency thereof.ry to or reflect those of the DISTRIBUTION OF THIS DOCUMENT IS UNLIMITE Table of Contents List of Tables v List of Figures v Abstract 1 1. Introduction 1 2. Architectures 1 2.1 CRAY X-MP 2 2.2 Fujitsu VP-200 4 2.3 Hitachi S-810/20 6 3. Comparison of Computers 8 3.1 IBM Compatibility
    [Show full text]
  • Supercomputer Fugaku
    Supercomputer Fugaku Toshiyuki Shimizu Feb. 18th, 2020 FUJITSU LIMITED Copyright 2020 FUJITSU LIMITED Outline ◼ Fugaku project overview ◼ Co-design ◼ Approach ◼ Design results ◼ Performance & energy consumption evaluation ◼ Green500 ◼ OSS apps ◼ Fugaku priority issues ◼ Summary 1 Copyright 2020 FUJITSU LIMITED Supercomputer “Fugaku”, formerly known as Post-K Focus Approach Application performance Co-design w/ application developers and Fujitsu-designed CPU core w/ high memory bandwidth utilizing HBM2 Leading-edge Si-technology, Fujitsu's proven low power & high Power efficiency performance logic design, and power-controlling knobs Arm®v8-A ISA with Scalable Vector Extension (“SVE”), and Arm standard Usability Linux 2 Copyright 2020 FUJITSU LIMITED Fugaku project schedule 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Fugaku development & delivery Manufacturing, Apps Basic Detailed design & General Feasibility study Installation review design Implementation operation and Tuning Select Architecture & Co-Design w/ apps groups apps sizing 3 Copyright 2020 FUJITSU LIMITED Fugaku co-design ◼ Co-design goals ◼ Obtain the best performance, 100x apps performance than K computer, within power budget, 30-40MW • Design applications, compilers, libraries, and hardware ◼ Approach ◼ Estimate perf & power using apps info, performance counts of Fujitsu FX100, and cycle base simulator • Computation time: brief & precise estimation • Communication time: bandwidth and latency for communication w/ some attributes for communication patterns • I/O time: ◼ Then, optimize apps/compilers etc. and resolve bottlenecks ◼ Estimation of performance and power ◼ Precise performance estimation for primary kernels • Make & run Fugaku objects on the Fugaku cycle base simulator ◼ Brief performance estimation for other sections • Replace performance counts of FX100 w/ Fugaku params: # of inst. commit/cycle, wait cycles of barrier, inst.
    [Show full text]
  • Cray Research Software Report
    Cray Research Software Report Irene M. Qualters, Cray Research, Inc., 655F Lone Oak Drive, Eagan, Minnesota 55121 ABSTRACT: This paper describes the Cray Research Software Division status as of Spring 1995 and gives directions for future hardware and software architectures. 1 Introduction single CPU speedups that can be anticipated based on code per- formance on CRAY C90 systems: This report covers recent Supercomputer experiences with Cray Research products and lays out architectural directions for CRAY C90 Speed Speedup on CRAY T90s the future. It summarizes early customer experience with the latest CRAY T90 and CRAY J90 systems, outlines directions Under 100 MFLOPS 1.4x over the next five years, and gives specific plans for ‘95 deliv- 200 to 400 MFLOPS 1.6x eries. Over 600 MFLOPS 1.75x The price/performance of CRAY T90 systems shows sub- 2 Customer Status stantial improvements. For example, LINPACK CRAY T90 price/performance is 3.7 times better than on CRAY C90 sys- Cray Research enjoyed record volumes in 1994, expanding tems. its installed base by 20% to more than 600 systems. To accom- plish this, we shipped 40% more systems than in 1993 (our pre- CRAY T94 single CPU ratios to vious record year). This trend will continue, with similar CRAY C90 speeds: percentage increases in 1995, as we expand into new applica- tion areas, including finance, multimedia, and “real time.” • LINPACK 1000 x 1000 -> 1.75x In the face of this volume, software reliability metrics show • NAS Parallel Benchmarks (Class A) -> 1.48 to 1.67x consistent improvements. While total incoming problem re- • Perfect Benchmarks -> 1.3 to 1.7x ports showed a modest decrease in 1994, our focus on MTTI (mean time to interrupt) for our largest systems yielded a dou- bling in reliability by year end.
    [Show full text]