arXiv:1608.07862v1 [quant-ph] 28 Aug 2016 nefrmtr ntereprmn,a lcrcdipole electric an experiment, their moment an In using by atom interferometer. polarized electrically Lepoutre an S. for Recently, effect can shift. the phase of et.al. nontrivial varying a time in the result that out pointed was in- Wilkens by the first induced in is out [ of pointed these property was which of dynamical moment, dipole inevitable One the of moments. fluence dipole dipole permanent for induced effects and shift phase the in differences non- with pos- atom Dowling by applied, [ accumulated polarizability are electric be vanishing fields can shift magnetic phase and sible electric the both to due observed been monopole. magnetic not of has pos- absence effect the the this through However, the- effect electromagnetic AC ory. in the symmetry to symmetry—dual related sible is effect This interfer- atom and [ the experiments by ence [ confirmed 1984 by been in moment also (AC) dipole Casher par- and magnetic spinor [ Aharonov non-vannishing neutral level for with macroscopic proposed the ticle was at effect tested same been Nearly also This has prediction. theoretical effect the and shift phase measured ymgei oooewssgetdb eadMcKel- and He [ by generated suggested lar a was fields of monopole magnetic magnetic moment and by dipole electric -1/2 between neutral interaction the to hf a rdce yAaoo n om(B n1959 in (AB) phase Bohm and topological [ Aharonov first by The predicted was unique. shift most exper- the interference were in wave iment matter topo- on effects the Particularly, phase logical . internal composite the measuring of as accurately properties viewed in been tequniqe powerful has most perturbations experi- external interference to matter-wave ments of mechanics. quantum sensitivity of high test The important most the been has field 11 1 ,ada xeln gemn a on ewe the between found was agreement excellent an and ], nteohrhn,i a one u htwhen that out pointed was it hand, other the On h nefrnebsdo h aentr fmatter of nature wave the on based interference The n ute icse yHrlyadBbkr[ Babiker and Horsley by discussed further and ] 7 [ E 13 [ Wilkens by independently later year a and ] on eotdta hyhv eetdapaeshift phase a detected have they that reported ] d et.al. colo hsc cec,SaniUiest fTechnolog of University Shaanxi Science, Physics of School 7 4 = iao [ atom Li ewrs oooia hss tminterference Atom phases, Topological 03.75.Dg Keywords: 14.80.Hv, dependen decisiv 03.65.Vf, velocity a numbers: the PACS have measure to to order necessary phas is in total it that the phases, indicates two therefore feature moment, This dipole phase. magnetic by induced ssonta h hs hf eevdb nue lcrcdi electric induced by received shift phase the that shown is h unu hs ffcsfridcdeeti n antcd magnetic and electric induced for effects phase quantum The nfrhr[ further in πε 0 α 4 yido unu hssfrIdcdDpl Moments Dipole Induced for Phases Quantum of Hybird – E 6 14 .Psil oooia hs due phase topological Possible ]. sidcdb napidelectric applied an by induced is .Te,isitrcinwt ap- with interaction its Then, ]. 10 .Hwvr hr r some are there However, ]. 9 ,adepoe yJ P. J. by explored and ], 3 .Ti ffc has effect This ]. Dtd uut1 2018) 1, August (Dated: 12 .It ]. a Ma Kai 8 2 ]. ]. ou ntepaeeet o atom. for will effects we elec- phase discussions, large the following on with the focus atom In Nevertheless, for moment. significant dipole one. tric be magnetic may the mixing by the dominated phase small the is then extremely moment, shift is dipole magnetic moment its to dipole comparing electric and mo- the as dipole neutron, such magnetic particles, and “fundamental” hybrid For electric magnetic the ments. for nonzero in phases of originates quantum result of possibility be This may errors, it polarizability. systematic that show uncontrolled yet will we as possiblly some difference this form 31% While comes by value. differs theoretical phase its the from of value measured the However, h arnincnb rte as, and written fields, be electric dipole can and magnetic Lagrangian magnetic the induced external This the the by to frame. felted couples rest fields its magnetic in effective particle the to due ization hsdpl oetcntttstoprs h rtone first The parts. two m constitutes moment dipole This le antcfield magnetic plied h eodone second The ozr antcpolarizability magnetic nonzero rmti arninoecnoti h aoia mo- canonical the obtain can mentum, one Lagrangian this From lcrmgei edwt velocity with field electromagnetic ioemmn.I h etfaeo atce ti given is it particle, of frame rest magnetic induced the by, an In carry moment. hence and dipole polarized be will it ∗ R e sfis osdranurlpril fmass of particle neutral a consider first us Let ≡ ,Hnhn 200 hax,P .China R. P. Shaanxi, 723000, Hanzhong y, L κ eo h bevdphase. observed the of ce B P = esrmn nete n fthese of one either on measurement e oehstesm omwt h one the with form same the has pole sahbi fteetotpsof types two these of hybrid a is e = sdet h tnadmgei . magnetic standard the to due is 2 1 pl oet r netgtd It investigated. are moments ipole m ∂ ∂ v L v ∆ 2 m = φ + m E M m κ 2 B = = ( v − ≡ B nue nnnrva hs shift, phase nontrivial an induces κ ~ 1 + ( − B I m κ v c − c d v c R r × × v c × · ( E × E d E κ ) v hni oe in moves it When . E × · tnsfrtepolar- the for stands + ( ntelbayframe, library the in ) B B . m ) − c . M v c × × E E . ) m . with (1) (2) (4) (3) 2

The last two terms of this canonical momentum give rise where to the minimal coupling which can be seen in the corre- v 1 sponding Hamiltonian, A˜ = −(E + × B) × B , V˜ = − E2 (11) c 2 1 κ H = (P − A)2 + κV , (5) Effectively, this Hamiltonian describes the interaction of 2m c a “matter particle” with effective charge χ and “electro- ˜ where magnetic field” with vector potential A and scalar po- tential V˜ = −E2/2. Just as in the AB and AC effect, v 1 A = (B − × E) × E , V = − κB2 (6) possible nontrivial phase shift can be generated by re- c 2 quiring that in the region of particle moving the effective Effectively, this Hamiltonian describes the interaction of magnetic and electric fields vanishing, a “matter particle” with effective charge κ and “electro- ˜ ˜ ˜ ˜ magnetic field” with vector potential A and scalar poten- Be = ∇× A =0 , Ee = −∇V =0 . (12) tial V = −B2/2. Just as in the AB and AC effect [15], Similar to the phase (8), the second term in (10) has no possible nontrivial phase shift can be generated by re- contribution for an enclosed path with constant magnetic quiring that in the region of particle moving the effective field over the path. magnetic and electric fields vanishing, For a particle which processes both nonzero the mag-

Bm = ∇ × A =0 , Em = −∇V =0 . (7) netic and electric polarizibilities, the combined phase shift is, Then, the nontrivial phase shifts are, κ + χ r B E κ κ φt = φm + φe = ~ d · × (13) ∆φS = dr · A , ∆φT = − dtV . (8) I   ~c I ~ I In the general case, if there are both electric and mag- If the electric field is constant over the two arms of netic field in the space region of particle moving, the interferometer, the second term in (8) will be zero due total phase for permanent electric and to cancellation between the contributions of two arms. moments is, The first term which is proportional to the magnetic and E B E B electric fields can generate a phase effect analogy to the ∆φperm = ∆φAC + ∆φAC + ∆φHMW + ∆φHMW . (14) ordinary AC effect with the replacement µr = κB. It is worthy to point out that, at a first glance, this par- In the case that the particle has both nonzero the mag- tial phase shift is not dispersionless due to the explicit netic and electric polarizibilities, and one provides that d E dependence of particle velocity. In fact, however, it is the atom has induced electric dipole p = χ for elec- E B dispersionless. This feature can be understand from that tric field and induced magnetic dipole µp = κ , then while one shifts the velocity of particle, the contribution the total phase can be obtained by replacing the perma- from this change are attributed to the first term in (8). nent electric and magnetic dipole in (14) with the total By requiring the external electromagnetic field satis- quantities, fies the condition (7), this effect can be force free. The d = d + d , µ = µ + µ , (15) simplest solution is that both electric and magnetic field 0 p 0 p are constant. However, as we have mentioned, to gener- where d0 and µ0 are the permanent electric and magnetic ate a nontrivial and measurable phase shift for enclosed dipole moments, respectively. Then one can get the total path, the effective magnetic field Bm must be nonzero, phase received by the atom, Bm =6 0, at some space region enclosed by the particle trajectory. With straightforward calculation, under the ∆φind = ∆φperm + ∆φmix + ∆φS + ∆φZ , (16) condition ∇ · B = 0, one can conclude that the only possible configuration is that particle trajectory encloses where, nonzero electric charge distributions. χ − κ Similar results can be obtained for the electric dipole ∆φmix = (E × B) · dr, (17) ~ I moment induced by external electric field, which is de- scribed by the Lagrangian, χ 2 κ 2 1 χ v v ∆φS = E dt, ∆φZ = B dt. (18) L˜ = mv2 + (E + × B) · (E + × B) . (9) ~ I ~ I 2 2 c c Usually, the Stark and Zeeman phases shifts can be ad- Then, the nontrivial phase shifts are, justed to zero by arranging the experiments such that χ χ the integrands on the two path are equal. The interest- ∆φ˜S = dr · A˜ , ∆φ˜T = − dtV˜ . (10) ~c I ~ I ing thing is the phase shift (17). 3

Recently, by using an atom interferometer, S. Lepoutre where E′ = B × v is the electric field in the rest frame of et.al.[13] reported that they detected a nontrivial phase particle. This mean that the relation (24) is consistent 7 shift for atom Li. The result was parametrized by eq. under the identification µ =4πε0αB. Thus the measured (1) which can also be written as, quantum phase could be a mixture of the phases induced by electric and magnetic dipole moments. 4πα ∆φexp = dr · (E × B) In summary, we have demonstrated clearly that the ~ I total quantum phase in a general case is a mixture of the 1 S B E phases induced by electric and magnetic dipole moments. = ~ d · (4πε0α )(∇ · ). (19) ZΩ And this could be a possible reason of the 31% offset observed in Lepoutre et.al.’s experiment [13]. One can clearly see that nonzero phase shift implies K. M. is supported by the China Scholarship Council nonzero electric charge distribution enclosed by the tra- and the Hanjiang Scholar Project of Shaanxi University jectory of particle, and vice verse. This is just the dis- of Technology. tinctive feature of AC effect. Further, one can make an identification,

µ =4πµ0αB. (20) ∗ Electronic address: [email protected] Then this phase is exactly the phase shift for an induced [1] Y. Aharonov, D. Bohm, Significance of Electromagnetic magnetic dipole moment µ with polarizibility κ =4πµ0α. Potentials in the Quantum Theory. Phys. Rev. 115, So, to identify the observed phase shift ∆φexp as the one 485(1959). induced by , one must exclude the [2] A. Caprez, B. Barwick, and H. Batelaan, Macroscopic 99 possibility of a nonzero induced magnetic dipole moment. Test of the Aharonov-Bohm Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. , 210401(2007). In Lepoutre et.al.’s paper [13], the electric dipole was de- [3] Y. Aharonov, A. Casher, Topological Quantum Effects for tected by using the atom interferometer with the follow- Neutral Particles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 319(1984). ing parametrization of potential enegy [14], [4] A. Cimmino, et.al., Observation of the topological Aharonov-Casher phase shift by neutron interferometry. 2 U = −2πε0α(E) , (21) Phys. Rev. Lett. 63 380(1989). [5] B. E. Allman et.al., Scalar Aharonov-Bohm experiment for an electric dipole moment d = 4πε0αE. And the with . Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2409(1992); Erratum: phase shift was parametrized as, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 250(1993). [6] K. Sangster, E. A. Hinds, S. M. Barnett, E. Riis, Mea- 2 ′ 2πε0α (E) surement of the Aharonov-Casher phase in an atomic sys- ∆φ = dr . (22) tem. Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3641(1993). ~ ZC v [7] X-G He, B. H. J. McKellar, Topological phase due to elec- However, assuming the atom has nonzero magnetic po- tric dipole moment and interaction Phys. Rev. A47, 3424(1993). larizability κ, then according to eq.(8), there will be an- [8] M. Wilkens, Quantum phase of a moving dipole. Phys. other phase shift, Rev. Lett. 72, 5(1994). [9] Haiqing Wei, Rushan Han, Xiuqing Wei, Quantum Phase κ ∆φm = − dr · ((v × E) × E) (23) of Induced Moving in a . Phys. ~ I Rev. Lett. 75, 2071(1995). [10] J. Dowling, C. Williams, J. Franson, Maxwell Duality, Making a transformation Lorentz Invariance, and Topological Phase. Phys. Rev. 83 ′ ′ Lett. , 2486(1999). d = µ × v (24) [11] M. Wilkens, Time, Phys. Rev. A47, 671(1993). [12] S. A. R. Horsley and M . Babiker, Topological Phases on eq.(22), then, for Composite Particles with Dynamic Properties, Phys. Rev. Lett 99, 090401(2007). ′ 1 ′ 1 ′ ′ [13] S. Lepoutre, A. Gauguet, G. Tr´enec, M. B¨uchner, J. ∆φ = dt(µ × v) · E = dtµ · B , (25) ~ ZC ~ ZC Vigu´e, He-MeKellar-Wilkens Topological Phase in Atom Interferometry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 120404(2012). where B′ = v × E is the magnetic field in the rest frame [14] A. Miffre, M. Jacquey, M. B¨uchner, G. Tr´ence, J. Vigu´e, of particle. This means that the observed phase shift can Atom interferometry measurement of the electric polariz- ability of lithium D38 also be identified as the non-vanishing magnetic dipole Eur. Phys. J. , 353(2006). ′ d′ ′ v [15] S. Dulat, K. Ma, The Topological Aharonov-Casher and moment µ with the relation = µ × . Now, back to Scalar Aharonov-Bohm Phases Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, B the previous identification µ =4πε0α and substitute it 319(2012). ′ with µ = µ/2 [16] into this relation, one has, [16] This is because that different normalizations in papers [13] and [14] have been used. This difference also can be ′ ′ d =2πε0αB × v =2πε0αE , (26) seen in Eqs. (26) and (21).