Tobacco Or Health in the European Union

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tobacco Or Health in the European Union TOBACCO OR HEALTH IN THE EUROPEAN UNION PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE Prepared by the ASPECT Consortium with financing from the Directorate-General for Health and Consumer Protection European Commission Directorate-General for Health and Consumer Protection Manuscript completed in October 2004 This report was financed by and prepared for the use of the European Commission, Directorate-General for Health and Consumer Protection. It does not necessarily represent the Commission's official position. These views have not been adopted nor approved by the European Commission and should not be relied upon as a statement of the views of the DG Health and Consumer Protection or the European Commission. The European Commission does not accept responsibility for any use made of the information contained in the report. Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union New freephone number: 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server (http://europa.eu.int). Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2004 ISBN 92-894-8219-2 © European Communities, 2004 Reproduction is authorised, except for commercial purposes, provided the source is acknowledged. Printed in Belgium Foreword At a conservative estimate, tobacco kills over 650,000 people each year in the European Union. Fighting tobacco use has been a public health priority for the European Community since 1985 and the launch of the “Europe Against Cancer” Programme. Since those early days, Community tobacco control has developed into three broad areas - legislation; mobilising European and International action and programme actions. With the Products Directive in 2001, the Community has introduced strict regulation around the sale and marketing of tobacco products, becoming the first region in the world to ban the use of misleading descriptors on cigarette packets, such as “mild” or “light”. The European Community and its Member States can also boast the most comprehensive advertising legisla- tion for tobacco in the world. On an international stage, the European Community has been instrumental in designing and achieving consensus on the World Health Organization's Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, the world's first global health treaty. As this Report shows, there is evidence that these and other measures by the Community and within the Member States have had a positive impact on smoking rates.Nearly two decades ago smoking prevalence for males was often around 50%. Although results vary from country to country, many Member States have reduced their prevalence of male smokers - some by as much as 15-20%. This translates into thousands of lives saved and sends out the important message: tobacco control works. However,while we have won many individual battles, it is clear that we have yet to win the war. Smoking remains the largest single cause of preventable death and disease in Europe. Smoking rates for females are increasing in some Member States and the average age to start smoking is now 11 years in some European countries.The tobacco industry is increasingly aware of the 3 need to target children and young adults to assure its future market. Therefore, despite our many achievements, it is clear that we cannot afford to rest on our laurels.We must keep up the momentum. This Report fills an important gap in tobacco-control policy for Europe. It represents the first attempt to draw together in one comprehensive book an analysis of tobacco-control policy (past, present and future) in the European Union.The Report presents the extent of the public health and economic cost of smoking and tobacco to European society. It provides a review of the effectiveness of previous tobacco policies and an analysis of the extent to which the tobac- co industry has sought to undermine and influence political decision making at all levels. The evidence presented is built up from a review of the currently available science, expert analysis and from the findings of a number of expert workshops and international conferences, such as the Limerick Tobacco Control Conference “Change is in the Air” that took place in June 2004 under the Irish Presidency of the European Union. Most importantly, the Report presents a set of recommendations. I hope that these will feed into and inform policy discussions,at European level or within Member States,and help to define a European tobacco-control policy for the future. David Byrne European Commissioner for Health and Consumer Protection Consultation process for the ASPECT (Analysis of the Science and Policy for European Control of Tobacco) report The preparation and drafting of the ASPECT (Analysis of the Science and Policy for European Control of Tobacco) report has involved one of the most extensive consulta- tions and peer reviews ever undertaken in European tobacco control. A consortium created for the purpose of writing the report and consisting of GOPA- Cartermill (GC), the European Heart Network (EHN), the European Network for Smoking Prevention (ENSP) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS) convened an Expert Panel drawn from a wide range of relevant disciplines to provide expertise and peer review of the report.Tobacco control experts from the 28 countries covered in this report were appointed as National Counterparts to advise on matters of fact and accu- racy relating to their countries.Additionally, a panel of International Experts was appoint- ed to provide a global perspective and advice on the latest developments in other leading tobacco-control jurisdictions.A list of the Expert Panel and National Counterparts, as well as a list of International Experts can be found in Annexes 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The report was written and circulated for comment between March and September 2004. Five workshops were organised to identify state-of-the-art policy and research and to facil- itate discussion and consensus building: one on tobacco product regulation in Brussels in March 2004 and a second on smoking in the workplace in Kracow in May 2004.The three final workshops on tobacco-control research, civil society, and product regulation and harm reduction were organised jointly with the Office of Tobacco Control, the Irish Department 4 of Health and the European Commission and took place during the High Level conference on tobacco control held under the Irish Presidency in Limerick in June 2004.The timing of all five enabled extensive consultation on and discussion of the recommendations of the report to take place.A list of speakers and topics covered in these workshops can be found in Annexes 4, 5 and 6. Report Coordinators Scientific: Dr Ann McNeill Honorary Senior Research Fellow, University College London Editorial: Fiona Godfrey EU Policy Advisor, European Respiratory Society, Brussels Administrative: Walter Koehn Senior Consultant, GOPA-Cartermill, Brussels General: January to April 2004:Andrew Hayes, European Cancer Leagues April to October 2004: Fiona Godfrey, European Respiratory Society Chapter coordinators: Chapter 1 Dr Ann McNeill, Honorary Senior Research Fellow, University College London, London, UK Chapter 2 Dr Hana Ross, Economist, University of Illinois at Chicago, International Tobacco Evidence Network, Chicago, USA Chapter 3 Luk Joossens,Tobacco Control Manager, Belgian Cancer Federation, Consultant to the European Cancer Leagues, Brussels, Belgium Chapter 4 Luk Joossens, Brussels, Belgium Chapter 5 Dr Ann McNeill, London, UK Chapter 6 Professor Gerard Hastings, Director of Cancer Research UK Centre for Tobacco Control Research, University of Stirling and the Open University, Scotland Chapter 7 Fiona Godfrey, EU Policy Advisor, European Respiratory Society, Brussels, Belgium Dr Ann McNeill, London, UK About the contributors Kathryn Angus is Editorial Assistant at the Cancer Research UK Centre for Tobacco 5 Control Research, University of Stirling and the Open University, Scotland. She has contributed to volumes for the Food Standards Agency, the European Commission and the WHO and has also coordinated the peer-review process for a special issue of Marketing Theory. Kathryn Angus was instrumental in developing Europe's first online database of internal tobacco industry documents. The archive features documentation relating to the advertising and marketing activities of UK tobacco accounts: www.tobac- copapers.com. Fiona Godfrey is a lawyer and tobacco-control advocate. She qualified as a solicitor in England and specialised in occupational health and safety law, personal injury and criminal litigation. She now works as a consultant on European Union health policy to the European Respiratory Society in Brussels and has previously acted as a consultant on European tobacco-control policy to the European Commission, the International Union Against Cancer and the WHO. Prof. Gerard Hastings is the Director of the Cancer Research UK Centre for Tobacco Control Research, University of Stirling and the Open University, Scotland. He was the first UK Professor of Social Marketing; founder/director of the Centre for Tobacco Control Research, the first centre of its kind in Europe. He is a Principal investi- gator on the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Study; Special Advisor to the House of Commons Select Committee on Health and an advisor on tobacco to the Scottish, UK and European Parliaments,
Recommended publications
  • Project SUN: a Study of the Illicit Cigarette Market In
    Project SUN A study of the illicit cigarette market in the European Union, Norway and Switzerland 2017 Results Executive Summary kpmg.com/uk Important notice • This presentation of Project SUN key findings (the ‘Report’) has been prepared by KPMG LLP the UK member firm (“KPMG”) for the Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies (RUSI), described in this Important Notice and in this Report as ‘the Beneficiary’, on the basis set out in a private contract dated 27 April 2018 agreed separately by KPMG LLP with the Beneficiary (the ‘Contract’). • Included in the report are a number of insight boxes which are written by RUSI, as well as insights included in the text. The fieldwork and analysis undertaken and views expressed in these boxes are RUSI’s views alone and not part of KPMG’s analysis. These appear in the Foreword on page 5, the Executive Summary on page 6, on pages 11, 12, 13 and 16. • Nothing in this Report constitutes legal advice. Information sources, the scope of our work, and scope and source limitations, are set out in the Appendices to this Report. The scope of our review of the contraband and counterfeit segments of the tobacco market within the 28 EU Member States, Switzerland and Norway was fixed by agreement with the Beneficiary and is set out in the Appendices. • We have satisfied ourselves, so far as possible, that the information presented in this Report is consistent with our information sources but we have not sought to establish the reliability of the information sources by reference to other evidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Cig Post Office London 1534 Cigarette Manufacturers
    CIG POST OFFICE LONDON 1534 CIGARETTE MANUFACTURERS. Roar Robt. Hy. & Oo. 6 Princes st. Caven­ Shipman Jacob, 15 Warren st. Fitzroy sq W Wills W. D. & H. 0. Branch of the Imperial ABDULLA& eo. LTD; 168 New Bond st W; dish sq W; sole makers of the "Parascho Simmons Henry, 8 Great Pultenev street W Tobacco Company (of Great Britain & factory & offices, 48 & 49 Wells street, Club" cigarette, registered-T A '"Para­ SMITH FORBES t.UGARD, 10 Burlington Ireland) Ltd. 53, 54 & 65HolbornviaductE C Oxford street W & 32, 33,34 & 35 Union scho, Wesdo"; T N 3153 Mayfair gardens W; factory, 30 & 32 Foubert's pi. (T N 2616 Holborn [2 lines]) & 31, 32 & SS street, Oxford street W Hodgson George Wm. 4 Holies st. Oxford st W Regent st W; warehouses, Xanthi, Turkey Snow hill EC Telegrams, " Abdul, Ox, London " Hopton M. & · Oo. Ltd. 29 Colvestone cres­ in Europe-T A " Cigarranda" ; T N's 1588 Wilson,Windham&Co.Ltd.50&51Hi.HlbnWC Tel. Nos. 1663, 1664 & 1665 Gerrard cent, Dalston NE & 5155 Mayfair Wix J. & Sons, 30A, Commercial road east E Adkin & Sons, Branch of the Imperial To. Hovenden R .. & Sons Ltd. 29, 30, 31, 32 & 33 Smith Philip & Co. 20 Piccadilly arcade SW & 175 & 176 PiccadillyW bacco Oo. (of Great Britain & Ireland)Ltd. Berners st W & 89, 91, 93 & 95 City road E C Societe Job (incorporating Bardou, Job & Wood John & Son (Cigar& Tobacco Importers) Yorkrd. factory, Dingley rd.St.Luke'sE C­ Ionides & Co. 2 Royal Opera arcade SW Pauilhac), 3 Denman st Ltd. 23 & 25 Queen Victoria street E C ; TA' 'Nutbrown,Isling";TN1502London Wall Janizaries & Cie.
    [Show full text]
  • Rotational Health Warnings for Cigarettes File No
    United States ofAmerica FEDERAL TRADE COM.MISSION Washington, D.C. 20580 Division of Advertising Practices l\1EMORANDUM TO: Public Records Office of the Secretary FROM: Bonnie McGregor Division ofAdvertising Practices DATE: December 22, 2015 SUBJECT: Rotational Health Warnings for Cigarettes File No. P854505 Please place the attached documents on the public record in the above-captioned matter. 1. December 18, 2014 letter from Karen E Delaney, Goodrich Tobacco Company, LLC to Mary K. Engle. 2. January 5, 2015 letter from Mary K. Engle to Karen E Delaney, Goodrich Tobacco Company, LLC. 3. December 23, 2014 letter from Anoush Sarkisyan on behalfof U.S. Cigaronne, Inc. to Mary K. Engle and William Ducklow. 4. January 9, 2015 letter from Mary K. Engle to Anoush Sarkisyan on behalf ofU.S. Cigaronne, Inc. 5. January 26, 2015 letter from Victoria Spier Evans, Vector Tobacco Inc. to Mary K. Engle. 6. February 3, 2015 letter from Mary K. Engle to Victoria Spier Evans, Vector Tobacco Inc. 7. February 3, 2015 letter from Eric F. Facer on behalf of Great Swamp Enterprises, Inc. to Mary K. Engle. 8. February 5, 2015 letter from Mary K. Engle to Eric F. Facer on behalfof Great Swamp Enterprises, Inc. Public Records December 22, 2015 Page 2 9. January 9, 2015 letter from Henry C. Roemer, III on behalf ofKretek International, Inc. to Mary K. Engle. 10. February 9, 2015 letter from Mary K. Engle to Henry C. Roemer, III on behalf of Kretek International, Inc. 11. February 5, 2015 letter from Silvia B. Pifiera-V azquez on behalf of R.G.
    [Show full text]
  • Golden Bat PDF Book
    GOLDEN BAT PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Sandy Fussell,Rhian Nest James | none | 01 May 2011 | Walker Books Australia | 9781921529474 | English | Newtown, Australia Golden Bat PDF Book The packages historically featured a golden bat on a moss green background. Incidentally it was 4 sen 0. Kills in Nyzul Isle will not count toward this trial; it must be defeated in Valkurm Dunes. Electronic cigarettes. Photo Gallery. Looking for something to watch? Antispam by CleanTalk. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. As part of the plans for the exploitation of China, during the thirties and forties the subsidiary tobacco industry of Mitsui had started production of special "Golden Bat" cigarettes using the then popular in the Far East trademark. External Sites. Edit Did You Know? Anime and manga portal. The mastermind of the plan, the General of the Imperial Japanese Army Kenji Doihara was later prosecuted and convicted for war crimes before the International Military Tribunal for the Far East sentenced him to death, but no actions ever took place against the company which profited from their production. After a quick fight, the underwater people kidnap Terry and flee inside a nearby puddle; Gaby tells this to Dr. MediaWiki spam blocked by CleanTalk. Erich Nazo. Company Credits. The design was also changed along with it. User Ratings. The only clip available of "Phantoma Phantaman" on the internet. Start a Wiki. It's worthy to note that the series was actually translated in Spanish as " Fantasmagorico ", with surviving episodes and official VHS releases found around the Internet. Sign In Don't have an account? Emily Paird Andrew Hughes Categories :.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual-Report-2020.Pdf
    LAPORAN TAHUNAN LAPORAN TAHUNAN 2020 ANNUAL REPORT 2020 ANNUAL REPORT ANNUAL Kantor Pusat Headquarters Jl. Rungkut Industri Raya No.18 Surabaya 60293, Indonesia Telephone: +62-31-8431-699 Tbk. PT HM SAMPOERNA Facsimile: +62-31-8430-986 Kantor Perwakilan di Jakarta Corporate Representative Office in Jakarta One Pacific Place, 18th Floor Sudirman Central Business District (SCBD) Jl. Jend. Sudirman Kav.52-53 Jakarta 12190, Indonesia PT HM SAMPOERNA Tbk. Telephone: +62-21-5151-234 Facsimile: +62-21-5152-234 Website: www.sampoerna.com 2020 Email: [email protected] LAPORAN TAHUNAN | ANNUAL REPORT LAPORAN TAHUNAN LAPORAN TAHUNAN LAPORAN TAHUNAN 2020 ANNUAL REPORT 2020 ANNUAL REPORT ANNUAL Kantor Pusat Headquarters Jl. Rungkut Industri Raya No.18 Surabaya 60293, Indonesia Telephone: +62-31-8431-699 PT HM S Facsimile: +62-31-8430-986 Kantor Perwakilan di Jakarta Corporate Representative Office in Jakarta AMPOERNA One Pacific Place, 18th Floor Sudirman Central Business District (SCBD) Jl. Jend. Sudirman Kav.52-53 Jakarta 12190, Indonesia Telephone: +62-21-5151-234 Tbk. Facsimile: +62-21-5152-234 Website: www.sampoerna.com Email: [email protected] 2020 LAPORAN TAHUNAN | ANNUAL REPORT Daftar Isi Contents Ikhtisar Highlights Sekilas Sampoerna 4 Sampoerna at a Glance Fakta-fakta Penting 2020 6 2020 Key Facts Ikhtisar Utama 2020 8 Key Highlights 2020 Kinerja Utama dan Ikhtisar Keuangan 14 Key Performance and Financial Highlights Ikhtisar Saham 15 Stock Highlights Penghargaan dan Sertifikasi 16 Awards and Certifications
    [Show full text]
  • Tobacco Securitization
    Memorandum Office of Jenine Windeshausen Treasurer-Tax Collector To: The Board of Supervisors From: Jenine Windeshausen, Treasurer-Tax Collector Date: October 27, 2020 Subject: Tobacco Securitization Action Requested a) Adopt a resolution consenting to the issuance and sale by the California County Tobacco Securitization Agency not to exceed $67,000,000 initial principal amount of tobacco settlement bonds (Gold Country Settlement Funding Corporation) Series 2020 Bonds in one or more series and other related matters; authorizing the execution and delivery by the county of a certificate of the county; and authorizing the execution and delivery of and approval of other related documents and actions in connection therewith. b) Direct that eligible proceeds from the Series 2020 Bonds be expended on infrastructure improvements at the Placer County Government Center, construction of the Health and Human Services Building and other Board approved capital facilities projects. Background October 6, 2020 Board of Supervisors Meeting Summary. Your Board received an update regarding the County’s prior tobacco securitizations and information on the potential to refund the Series 2006 Bonds to receive additional proceeds for capital projects. Based on that update, the Board requested the Treasurer to return to the Board on October 27, 2020 with a resolution approving documents and other matters to proceed with refunding the Series 2006 Bonds. In summary from the October 6, 2020 meeting, the County receives annual payments in perpetuity from the 1998 Master Settlement Agreement (MSA). The MSA payments are derived from a percentage of cigarette sales. Placer County issued bonds in 2002 and 2006 to securitize a share of its MSA payments.
    [Show full text]
  • Take a Stand Against Illegal Tobacco
    Take a stand against Illegal Tobacco The current state of play Illegal tobacco sales in the UK continue to undermine legitimate business whilst providing criminals with huge profits. The continued availability of cheap illegal tobacco in communities across the country undermines attempts to prevent underage people accessing tobacco as illegal tobacco sellers do not care who they sell to. The smuggling of tobacco is a multibillion pound industry for criminals. The high level of tax in the UK, the large difference in the tax rates between the UK and other countries, and the openness of international borders creates the perfect environment for criminals to operate. Criminal organisations and opportunist smugglers are targeting the lucrative UK tobacco market. HM Revenue & Customs' 2012/13 estimates show that revenue theft could be as much as £2.9 billion.1 For a criminal, tobacco smuggling is relatively easy. Tobacco products come in small packages, are highly valuable and easy to transport; whilst the risks of detection, prosecution and conviction, though improving, are low relative to the huge profits. For example, a single container of illegal cigarettes can provide criminals with a profit of up to £2 million.2 It's clear more needs to be done! Did you know? HM Revenue & Customs estimates show that revenue A single container of illegal theft could be as cigarettes can provide criminals much as £2.9 billion1 with a profit of up to £2 million Illegal Tobacco Explained What is NUKDP? Non-UK duty paid (NUKDP) is a catch-all phrase used to describe cigarettes and roll your own tobacco (RYO) found in the UK that has not incurred UK taxes.
    [Show full text]
  • 4-H Canning Label Found at Under “State Fair” Or Located Below
    DIVISION 6036 - 4-H FOOD PRESERVATION EXHIBITS—2016 Sandra Bastin – Food & Nutrition Specialist Martha Welch – 4-H Youth Development Specialist 1. Classes in Division: 861-865. 2. Number of Entries Permitted: a. County may submit ONE entry per class. b. A member may enter one class in the Food Preservation division. (This means: a member’s name should appear only one time on the county’s Food Preservation Division invoice sheet.) 3. General Rules: a. See “General Rules Applying to All 4-H Exhibitors in the Kentucky State Fair” at www.kystatefair.org Click on “Compete,” then “Premium Book”, then “4-H Exhibits.” b. Items must meet the requirements for the class; otherwise, the entry may be disqualified. c. Items entered must have been completed by the exhibitor within the current program year. d. The decision of the judges is final. 4. Unique Rules or Instructions: a. Recipes: Entries are to be made using recipes found in the 2016 4-H Fair Recipe Book at http://4- h.ca.uky.edu/content/food-and-nutrition or contact your county Extension agent for 4-H YD. b. Canned entries must be prepared from raw produce. c. Re-canning of commercially processed foods is not permitted. d. Helpful Information for the following classes can be found on the National Center for Home Food Preservation website. e. Jars not processed by the correct method will not be judged. Open kettle processing is not acceptable for any product. f. Jars must be clear, clean STANDARD jars specifically designed for home canning. If mayonnaise or similar non-standard jars are used, the product will not be judged or awarded a premium.
    [Show full text]
  • When One Person's Habit Becomes Everyone's Problem: the Battle Over Smoking Bans in Bars and Restaurants
    Volume 14 Issue 1 Article 5 2007 When One Person's Habit Becomes Everyone's Problem: The Battle over Smoking Bans in Bars and Restaurants Marot Williamson Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/mslj Part of the Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons Recommended Citation Marot Williamson, When One Person's Habit Becomes Everyone's Problem: The Battle over Smoking Bans in Bars and Restaurants, 14 Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports L.J. 161 (2007). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/mslj/vol14/iss1/5 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal by an authorized editor of Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. Williamson: When One Person's Habit Becomes Everyone's Problem: The Battle ov WHEN ONE PERSON'S HABIT BECOMES EVERYONE'S PROBLEM: THE BATTLE OVER SMOKING BANS IN BARS AND RESTAURANTS I. INTRODUCTION For many, smoking a cigarette while enjoying a drink while out at a bar or restaurant are activities that go hand in hand.1 Despite the social popularity of this duo, recent smoking bans around the country are putting an end to smoking in bars and restaurants. 2 Scientists have found that smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those surrounding the smoker.3 Although society once consid- ered smoking a fashionable and generally acceptable activity, knowledge of its health risks is compelling lawmakers to pass laws prohibiting smoking in public places.
    [Show full text]
  • Tobacco Control Survey, England 2019-2020
    www.tradingstandards.uk TOBACCO CONTROL SURVEY ENGLAND 2019/20 Jane MacGregor, MacGregor Consulting Limited for the Chartered Trading Standards Institute 18 1 Tobacco Control Survey, England 2019/2020: A Report of Trading Standards Service Activity CONTENTS Summary 4 Premises where products were Figure 7: Percentage of test purchase Introduction 4 non-compliant with SPoT 26 operations resulting in illegal sales Context 5 Actions taken 27 between 2008/09 and 2019/20 12 Methodology 5 Actions taken UAS tobacco 28 Figure 8: Underage sales: tobacco - Actions taken UAS NIPs 28 proportion of test purchase operations Tobacco control activities 6 by type of premises 13 Actions taken illicit tobacco 29 Priority given to tobacco control activities 6 Figure 9: Underage sales: nicotine Tobacco control activities 8 Actions taken TRPRs tobacco 29 inhaling products - total number of test Underage sales 9 Actions taken TRPRs NIPs 30 purchase operations and sales made 15 Tobacco products 10 Actions taken SPoT 31 Figure 10: Underage sales: nicotine Complaints and enquiries received 10 Conclusion 31 inhaling products - percentage visits Complaints and enquiries received by Underage sales: tobacco products 31 resulting in illegal sale 15 premises type 10 Underage sales: NIPs 32 Figure 11: Underage sales: nicotine Test purchase operations for tobacco 11 Illicit tobacco products 32 inhaling products - proportion of test purchase operations by type of premises 16 Number of test purchase operations Tobacco and Related Products resulting in illegal sale 11 Regulations
    [Show full text]
  • Qualitative Research Into Ryo Habits and Attitudes
    Colgithomi Associates Market Research Consultants QUALITATIVE RESEARCH INTO RYO HABITS AND ATTITUDES THE DEBRIEF PRESENTATION DOCUMENT Prepared by : Colquhoun Associates Prepared for: Patrick Roozeman, Gallaher Ltd Project Tri,/9834/ GC March 1998 82 Surhiton Hill Park, Surbiton, Surrey KT5 SER Tcl: 0181 399 2741 Fax: 0181 399 7159 Mobile : 0830 256137 Page Number I BACKGROUND 1 II RESEARCH OBJECTIVES III METHOD AND SAMPLE 3 IV MAIN FINDINGS 4 I . Tar and Nicotine 1 .1 Current Perceptions 1 .2 Expectations 5 1 .3 Overall 6 1 .4 Reactions to Levels 7 2 . Tar/Nicotine Matrix 8 2.1 Expectations 2.2 TN Matrix 9 2._'.1 Initial Responses 2.2.2 Subsequent Understanding 10 2.2.3 Summary of Understanding 3 . New Low Tar Proposition 11 4. Tobacco Characteristics 12 4.1 Overview 4.2 Arrival at Preferred Brand 13 4.3 Preferred Brands 4 .3.1 Old Holbom 4.3.2 Golden Virginia 14 4 .3.3 Drum 4.3.4 Samson continental 4.4 Birds Eye Stem 15 4.4.1 Old Holbom Loyalists 4.4.2 Drurn/Samson continental 16 4.5 Moisture Levels 17 4.6 Drum/Samson continental -Potential 19 4.6.1 BES 4.6.2 Moisture Level 5 . Packaging 20 5 .1 Old Holborn 5.1 .1 Pack Shape ". 1 .2 Pack Feel 5.1 .3 Seal 21 I ." Extemal Seal 5.1 .6 Cellophane Proposition _' Golden Virginia 2 3 5.2.1 Pack Shape 2. 2 Pack Feel Wrap Cellophane .3 2 . 5 5 .2 .4 Double Wrap Seal External 5 .3 Drum/ Samson continental 5.3 .1 Pack Shape 5.3 ? Pack Feel 5.3 .3 External Seal 5 .3 .4 Wrap 6.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Industry Investments, Impact and Influence in the Former Soviet Union a B Gilmore, M Mckee
    136 Tob Control: first published as 10.1136/tc.2002.002667 on 2 June 2004. Downloaded from RESEARCH PAPER Tobacco and transition: an overview of industry investments, impact and influence in the former Soviet Union A B Gilmore, M McKee ............................................................................................................................... Tobacco Control 2004;13:136–142. doi: 10.1136/tc.2002.002667 Objectives: To quantify the contribution the tobacco industry has made to foreign direct investment (FDI) in the former Soviet Union (FSU) as an indicator of its political and economic leverage; to explore the impact this has had on production capacity and tobacco control in the region. Design: Data on industry investment and its impact on cigarette production capacity were collated from industry journals, reports, and websites. Data on total FDI were obtained from the European Bank of See end of article for Reconstruction and Development. authors’ affiliations Results: By the end of 2000, transnational tobacco companies (TTCs) had invested over US$2.7 billion in ....................... 10 countries of the FSU. Tobacco money as a proportion of FDI varies from 1% to over 30% in Uzbekistan. Correspondence to: Cigarette production capacity in the factories receiving investments tripled from 146 to 416 billion Dr A Gilmore, European cigarettes per annum and the TTCs’ market share has increased from nothing to between 50–100% in the Centre on Health of Societies in Transition, markets in which they invested. Findings suggest that the effectiveness of national tobacco control London School of Hygiene measures corresponds broadly to the nature of the political and economic transition in each country and and Tropical Medicine, the size of industry investment, which is determined in part by the political context.
    [Show full text]