DOCSLIB.ORG

T He E No Ree R Iver B Luew Ay

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
T He E No Ree R Iver B Luew Ay 82°12'30"W 82°10'0"W 82°7'30"W 82°5'0"W 82°2'30"W 82°0'0"W 81°57'30"W 81°55'0"W 81°52'30"W W / South Tyger River 0 E A N N D H I L 9 " " 5 Greenville N D B L Pelham Mill Park Mile 12 O N - 8 R U 0 0 - S T R 2 E County t L B T V . I 3 3 E 4 N T B E ' ' i 2770 E. Phillips Road, Greer, SC 29650 G - A n Pelham V R R L B g Y 7 2 T M j S e O S n r This park's focal point is the Enoree River O s D S C Mill Park S 2 R 4 5 R Visit www.upstateforever.org/ C u I R V y 6 T D r D ° ° E V O t and an overlook where visitors can view b e E T C A blueway-mapping for the A E e D I 4 4 n I R IN C n R D South Tyger River L L k architecturHal remains of one of the first textile Tyger River Blueway map. T R k E R u R a 3 3 zj z K L R T I e n t S Mile 10 E M o N A M edy r mills in Greenville County. River access is E North Tyger River D River 7 O - T C O a 1 A k R Mile 6 Enoree River downstream of the masonry dam, river-left. 4 S S D N N Pelham 4 p E il 1 R D G Mile 84 \ l S Y D k a R y I r Mill Dam W A R d D Gibbs w B k Gibbs H E S H I 31 C Shoals P R 2 r C OR S Shoals e C S / Class I e S M D k N k R B k Rapids E LACK k S E TOCK Enoree River / R 0 RD Class I G Àz / 9 Mile 82 6 D - 4 9 D R R South Tyger River North Tyger River Pelham Rapids 2 R E D 2 1 Z D 1 Mile 4 4 T d Mile 8 R Y E D I N Railroa 2 - Y k W G X Falls L R S O S 2 W L P R C E S W (stay left) H I N L V G U Y D k C A R D H D B R S I M E W D E K E N I C Enoree River N H North Tyger River E S R C A R Caution! Mile 80 P South Tyger River Mile 2 T D k O O T Y S A R N Mile 6 R k T The potential R U B D D W S N N R A S woody R WA H D " " Pelham DEL O D L P L debris K E RD South Tyger River D 0 0 LS 6 HIL B N S ' ' 9 C Tyger 10 R I Mill Dam 2 S G S Mile 4 ID 5 0 O C G V Y T D D Nature Park I H j\ T E 4 5 W Avoid the dam entirely. Portage R 7 H E D power W L E 1 ° ° N R R 4 Y Price Trail R around the dam is available C N lines O D E 4 4 S E 1 G k Y 01 House South Tyger River 3 3 B D river-left. Follow the path 175 I W jz S R Nature Mile 2 GETT H C AG RD yards and re-enter the river below B A B N potential Trail H South Tyger River D C S Àz Tyger River the dam. This is a lengthy portage, S X Mile 0 E woody O P RI R Spartanburg Mile 46 D S R be prepared to carry your boat. G O debris U R N a E Enoree River S I Tyger River i C R l D Mile 78 r E S D SC HWY 146 County, SC o R Mile 44 C E a S R W HW Enoree River R d M UT O potential R D LN Y k Mile 76 I A O 1 S Pete V A W D 46 C rs k woody E F E RD R / W HW debris R S OV Àz UF O Y Cr Enoree River R C H W GR F RD OD 14 eek D W IE RU 6 / Mile 74 Y 1 V Five FF power lines 01 K Tyger River Y XW RD D / S A Mile 42 C HW R C O AN S Forks, E power lines R KM E D HW R SHAW R Tyger River 296 D L lder P R Photo by Mickey Ocean WO D R SC IL Gi O Y SJ Y Mile 40 S k O E 1 HW FORK k V ree C G 4 D E ree S C ID 6 R V G ilder C E R S A Woodruff IN I N k B TA I F S T Van G Recreation T O S N N E C J Enoree River -4 E " " 2 R Mile 72 - R Patton Center R U / k 5 City of O 0 0 F 1 D Shoals S 7 D rocks E T F 3 3 1 D (Class II-III) ' ' L 4 R AN R U G A HM E Woodruff, E T 2 7 across Y N AC E E T O D À TA E C G N IN D I 4 4 N R O H SC H 418 / U N - W R river k Y F O R D R Woodruff High ° ° D Mills Mill SC O W I W 2 H G L E 4 4 McKinney Park G 6 N U R i School Trails k c Ball L G 3 3 C I R A k k Path 0.26 miles 0.86 and D S Field K I k Class II Shoals XW D V B Shoals C McKinney R S k r 0.97 miles E e D R Enoree River k B L e Park E L R L Laurens E Mile 70 k I k B P Enoree River E S e E H T D e H Mile 68 G C r A County, SC O Enoree River D C R N D S D n O Mile 66 L I H Y i C C e A l UNOFFICIAL: Kilgore Bridge Road C O R p R S Class II-III I d H W e C H S W s D W i X B r Y G o 4 Rapids/ ne River Access and Roadside Parking Y Y H 1 R 8 R 1 Wofford C a 4 Shoals r 6 1 T O i e l 2790 Kilgorer eBerkidge Road, Woodruff, SC 29388 C z r C e 4 L w / Shoals EN E o om ile CROSS ANCHOR RD LL k a H D I A d Roadside parking is available on both sides of the road GIA R S B (Class II) G U RD U OR E R E north of the river (river-left). Follow the dirt trail below E DG GE N Enoree River BRI S I S N E D R D 7 O D H C J R R Mile 64 the bridge to the sandy beach. This access is unofficial 1 K W W H T L C N 2 R W 4 L T Y I I / 2 G but widely used. Use at your own risk. E H 1 H D Y Y M Y C N D N R H T 1 S A O I R E 1 K W R O P N 0 TO 4 S H E A S L 1 S 6 R T S C D T T N N S L Y N A A " " Hors / UNOFFICIAL: Fountain Inn ep C A T e K U W 0 0 n C D potential A W ' ' reek R R E D O T O R Road / SC 418 River Access woody H 0 5 E - KS C H O M A O 4 4 I C 2199 Fountain Inn Road, debris A 2 C R S ° ° G 6 R GE RD Woodruff, SC 29388 S T UNOFFICIAL: D 4 4 BRI E O power wo 3 3 G Unload boats and put-in downstream of the mileC Union Highway / SC 49 E line r Class I e bridge, river right. Cars can be parked Enoree River crossing e k River Access and Roadside Parking H R D k Rapid k Mile 62 e Durb upstream, river left away from the bridge. E in D US 2470 Union Highway, Enoree, SC 29335 O H e W GIA J E W R r O G k R O k W N Creek Do not block the road, driveways, or park Du Y XW e r R 2 Put-in downstream of the Union Hghway bridge, e D b C E D r A E i large rock 2 R n C on private property. I n E 1 h G rbi S ek O river-left.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Life in the Queensborough Township: Data Recovery at Hannah's Quarter
    Life in the Queensborough Township: Data Recovery at Hannah’s Quarter, Site 9Jf195, Jefferson County, Georgia Front Cover: Hannah Tartan and Hannah Family Badge Life in the Queensborough Township: Data Recovery at Hannah’s Quarter, Site 9Jf195, Jefferson County, Georgia GDOT Project FLF-540(28); PI Number 222295 By Daniel T. Elliott and Rita F. Elliott with contributions by Linda Scott Cummings, Susan Scott Jackson, Andrea Shea, and Debra J. Wells Prepared for: Earth Tech 701 Corporation Center Drive, Suite 475 Raleigh, North Carolina 27607-5074 and Georgia Department of Transportation Office of Environment/Location 3993 Aviation Circle Atlanta, Georgia 30336-1593 Prepared by: Southern Research, Historic Preservation Consultants, Inc. P.O. Box 250 Ellerslie, Georgia 31807 Principal Investigator, Daniel T. Elliott _________________________________ April 2002 Abstract Archaeological data recovery at the Hannah’s Quarter site (9Jf195) in rural Jefferson County, Georgia was conducted by Southern Research Historic Preservation Consultants in 2001. This project was performed for the Georgia Department of Transportation through a contract with Earth Tech in Raleigh, NC as Section 106 compliance in advance of the Fall Line Freeway construction. The archaeological study uncovered a small residential compound from the late eighteenth through early nineteenth centuries. Three dwelling loci and one possible outbuilding locus were delineated. The occupation at this site was evidenced by a series of cultural features, including pits, posts, and cellars and extremely sparse material culture evidence. The settlement began as part of the Queensborough Township, which was populated by Scots-Irish Presbyterians from northern Ireland from about 1768 to 1772. William Hannah was identified as a strong candidate for being the original owner of the property at 9Jf195.
    [Show full text]
  • Piedmont Ecoregion Aquatic Habitats
    Piedmont Ecoregion Aquatic Habitats Description and Location The piedmont ecoregion extends south of Blue Ridge to the fall line near Columbia, South Carolina and from the Savannah River east to the Pee Dee River. Encompassing 24 counties and 10,788 square miles, the piedmont is the largest physiographic province in South Carolina. The piedmont is an area with gently rolling hills dissected by narrow stream and river valleys. Forests, farms and orchards Pee Dee-Piedmont EDU dominate most of the land. Elevations Santee-Piedmont EDU Savannah-Piedmont EDU range from 375 to 1,000 feet. The Piedmont Ecoregion cuts across the top of three major South Carolina drainages, the Savannah, the Santee and the Pee Dee, forming three ecobasins: the Savannah-Piedmont, Santee-Piedmont and Pee Dee-Piedmont. Savannah-Piedmont Ecobasin The Savannah River drainage originates in the mountains of North Carolina and Georgia. The Savannah River flows southeast along the border of South Carolina and Georgia through the piedmont for approximately 131 miles on its way to the Atlantic Ocean. Major tributaries to the Savannah River in the South Carolina portion of this ecobasin include the Tugaloo River, Seneca River, Chauga River, Rocky River, Little River and Stevens Creek. The ecobasin encompasses 36 watersheds and approximately 2,879 square miles. The vast majority of the land is privately owned with only 239 square miles protected by federal, state and private entities. Most of the protected land (192 square miles) occurs in Sumter National Forest. The ecobasin contains 3,328 miles of lotic habitat with 143 square miles of impoundments.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Broad River Development from Henderson Island to Hampton Island
    History of the Broad River Development From Henderson Island to Hampton Island Prepared For: South Carolina Electric & Gas Company 220 Operation Way Cayce, South Carolina 29033-3701 Prepared By: 521 Clemson Road Columbia, South Carolina 29229 December 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 2 DEVELOPMENTAL HISTORY 3 Early Settlement 3 The Revolutionary War 4 Civil War 5 Reconstruction – 20th Century 7 HYDROELECTRIC DEVELOPMENT 9 HISTORIC SITES 14 Parr Shoals 14 Fairfield Pumped Storage 19 Lyles Ford 22 REFERENCES 23 INTRODUCTION The existing Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) license for the Parr Hydroelectric Project (FERC Project No. 1894) expires on June 30, 2020. As a result, cultural resources investigations were conducted to assist the South Carolina Electric & Gas Company (SCE&G) in complying with the FERC relicensing process for the Parr Hydroelectric Project. The Parr Hydroelectric Project is located in central South Carolina along the Broad River in eastern Newberry County and western Fairfield County. The project includes both the Parr Shoals Development and the Fairfield Pumped Storage Facility Development. The total project area encompasses 4,400 acres on the Broad River and its tributaries between Henderson Island to the north and Hampton Island to the south, and Monticello Reservoir. As part of the FERC relicensing process, a Phase I cultural resources survey of the Parr Hydroelectric Project was completed in 2013 and 2014. Additional Phase II archaeological investigations were conducted in 2016 at two archaeological sites, 38NE8 and 38NE10. As a result of these investigations, four resources were identified as being eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP): the Parr Shoals Development, the Fairfield Pumped Storage Facility, Lyles Ford; and archaeological site 38NE8.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality
    3. Existing Conditions and WaterEnvironmental Quality Consequences 3.6 Water Quality 3.6.1 CHANGES TO THIS CHAPTER SINCE THE DEIS Since the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) the acreage of water resources in the project area have been updated to reflect the design changes resulting in the Refined Recommended Preferred Alternative (RPA); impacts resulting from the Refined RPA; and reflect the impacts to impervious and pervious surface areas of the Refined RPA. 3.6.2 HOW IS WATER QUALITY ASSESSED? The Clean Water Act (CWA) of 1972 requires that each state set water quality standards for all contaminants in surface waters. These standards are typically based on criteria recommended by the US Environmental In South Carolina, the SCDHEC Protection Agency (USEPA). The CWA also regulates the discharge of is responsible for monitoring pollutants into our state’s waters. In South Carolina, the USEPA has and regulating water quality delegated the responsibility of monitoring and regulating water quality for the USEPA. to the Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC). Many factors can affect water quality, including pesticides, heavy metals, livestock waste, litter, oils and grease, and other chemicals. Water from rain and runoff collect these pollutants and carry them into creeks and rivers. Natural resources and processes can also affect water quality. The amount of tree cover over streams and rivers can affect the temperature of the water, thereby affecting the habitat for other plants, fish, and insects. Additionally, sediment from erosion can wash downstream and impact the depth and important substrate within the stream. Existing Conditions and Environmental Consequences Water Quality FEIS May 2019 Page 3-237 3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historic South Carolina Floods of October 1–5, 2015
    Service Assessment The Historic South Carolina Floods of October 1–5, 2015 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service Silver Spring, Maryland Cover Photograph: Road Washout at Jackson Creek in Columbia, SC, 2015 Source: WIS TV Columbia, SC ii Service Assessment The Historic South Carolina Floods of October 1–5, 2015 July 2016 National Weather Service John D. Murphy Chief Operating Officer iii Preface The combination of a surface low-pressure system located along a stationary frontal boundary off the U.S. Southeast coast, a slow moving upper low to the west, and a persistent plume of tropical moisture associated with Hurricane Joaquin resulted in record rainfall over portions of South Carolina, October 1–5, 2015. Some areas experienced more than 20 inches of rainfall over the 5-day period. Many locations recorded rainfall rates of 2 inches per hour. This rainfall occurred over urban areas where runoff rates are high and on grounds already wet from recent rains. Widespread, heavy rainfall caused major flooding in areas from the central part of South Carolina to the coast. The historic rainfall resulted in moderate to major river flooding across South Carolina with at least 20 locations exceeding the established flood stages. Flooding from this event resulted in 19 fatalities. Nine of these fatalities occurred in Richland County, which includes the main urban center of Columbia. South Carolina State Officials said damage losses were $1.492 billion. Because of the significant impacts of the event, the National Weather Service formed a service assessment team to evaluate its performance before and during the record flooding.
    [Show full text]
  • Union County, South Carolina Comprehensive Plan 2040
    UNION COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2040 A SHARED VISION FOR OUR TOMORROW JANUARY 26, 2021 DRAFT ADOPTED (INSERT DATE) UNION COUNTY | COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 1 This page left blank intentionally. 22 UNION COUNTY | COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................9 CHAPTER 2 THE VISION .................................................................................................................. 17 CHAPTER 3 POPULATION .............................................................................................................. 23 CHAPTER 4 LAND USE ..................................................................................................................... 31 CHAPTER 5 TRANSPORTATION .................................................................................................... 43 CHAPTER 6 HOUSING ..................................................................................................................... 55 CHAPTER 7 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT .................................................................................. 63 CHAPTER 8 CULTURAL RESOURCES .......................................................................................... 85 CHAPTER 9 NATURAL RESOURCES ............................................................................................ 93 CHAPTER 10 COMMUNITY FACILITIES .....................................................................................107 CHAPTER 11
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Memorandum
    Technical Memorandum To: South Carolina Department of Natural Resources (DNR) South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC) From: CDM Smith Date: January 2015 Subject: Methodology for Unimpaired Flow Development Saluda River Basin, South Carolina (Prepared as part of the South Carolina Surface Water Quantity Modeling Program) 1.0 Background and Objectives for Unimpaired Flows Unimpaired Flow (UIF) describes the natural hydrology of a river basin. UIFs quantify streamflows throughout a river basin in the absence of human intervention in the river channel, such as storage, withdrawals, discharges, and return flows. From this basis, modeling and decision making can be compared with pristine conditions. This memorandum explains the methods that will be employed to develop UIFs for South Carolina’s Saluda River basin. It describes data needs, methods for filling data gaps, and issues specific to the Saluda River basin. Once developed, UIFs will be input to the Simplified Water Allocation Model (SWAM) to evaluate surface water hydrology and operations throughout the basin. The UIFs for the Saluda Basin will extend from 1925-2013. UIFs will serve two purposes: ° UIFs will be the fundamental input to the model at headwater nodes and tributary nodes upstream of historic management activity, representing naturally occurring water in the riverways. Current and future management practices such as storage, withdrawals, and discharges will be superimposed on the UIFs. ° UIFs will provide a comparative basis for model results. The impacts of current and future management practices on flow throughout the river network can be compared to the natural conditions represented by the UIFs, and decisions about relative impacts can be well informed.
    [Show full text]
  • Columbia Conference Active Community Guide
    COLUMBIA CONFERENCE Schools, Parks, and Recreation Facilities It’s your active community! Chester, Edgefield, Fairfield, Kershaw, Lancaster, Lexington, Newberry, Richland, Union Being active at home is great. There are also many places ready to help you be active, right outside your door! So, get out and see your community. Your new active lifestyle may help you see things you never knew were there. Below is a list of free and low-cost (most less than $5/entry) activities in your area, from parks & recreation facilities, to beaches, riverwalks & school yards. Look by county or by places most interesting to you. Take a walk somewhere new, everyday! Let’s Get Moving! Schools can be great neighborhood sites for community physical activity. On weekends and after school hours, neighborhoods may have access to safe playgrounds, and track and field space. Contact your areas schools for more information. School District Offices - Contact Information Chester County Schools Edgefield County Schools 109 Hinton Street, Chester, SC 29706 3 Par Drive, Edgefield , SC 29824 (803) 385 – 6122 (803) 279 – 5123 http://www.chester.k12.sc.us http://www.edgefield.k12.sc.us Fairfield County Schools Kershaw County Schools 1226 US Highway 321 By-Pass South, 1301 DuBose Court, Camden, SC 29020 Winnsboro, SC 29180 (803) 432 – 8416 (803) 635 – 4607 http://www.kershaw.k12.sc.us http://www.fairfield.k12.sc.us Lancaster County Schools Lexington County Schools – District 1 300 Catawba Street, Lancaster, SC 29720 100 Tarrar Springs Road, Lexington, SC 29072 (803) 286
    [Show full text]
  • Low-Flow Characteristics of Streams in South Carolina
    Prepared in cooperation with the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control Low-Flow Characteristics of Streams in South Carolina Open-File Report 2017–1110 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover. South Carolina Botanical Garden, Clemson, South Carolina. Photograph by Toby D. Feaster. Low-Flow Characteristics of Streams in South Carolina By Toby D. Feaster and Wladmir B. Guimaraes Prepared in cooperation with the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control Open-File Report 2017–1110 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior RYAN K. ZINKE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey William H. Werkheiser, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2017 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit https://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https://store.usgs.gov. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. Suggested citation: Feaster, T.D., and Guimaraes, W.B., 2017, Low-flow characteristics of streams in South Carolina: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2017–1110, 161 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20171110.
    [Show full text]
  • Spartanburg County
    SPARTANBURG COUNTY Location of survey: Landrum vicinity Report title: Cultural Resources Survey of the S-128 North Pacolet River Bridge Replacement, Spartanburg County, South Carolina. Date: August 2009 Surveyor: Brockington and Associates (Scott Butler) Number of sites: 1 SHPO site number: 0738 Description: Report (38 pp., including appendices) includes project description, environmental and cultural setting, identification of archaeological and architectural resources, a geomorphology report, artifact catalog, maps, and photographs; no site forms; one item correspondence. Location: S108043, Box #26, Folder #757 Location of survey: Moore vicinity Report title: Phase 1 Cultural Resources Survey S-64, Anderson Mill Road, Bridge Over the North Tyger River Improvements Corridor, Spartanburg County, South Carolina. Date: August 2009 Surveyor: Brockington and Associates (C. Scott Butler and Michael Reynolds) Number of sites: 5 SHPO site numbers: 0351, 0205, 1010-1012 Description: Report (46 pp., including appendices) includes project description, environmental and cultural setting, identification of archaeological and architectural resources, a geomorphology report, artifact catalog, maps, and photographs; six page addendum report; five site forms with photographs; one item correspondence. Location: S108043, Box #26, Folder #753 Location of survey: Greer vicinity Report title: Cultural Resources Survey of the Proposed Improvements to the Intersection of SC 357 at Gap Creek Road, Spartanburg County, South Carolina. Date: March 2007 Surveyor: Brockington and Associates (Edward Salo) Number of sites: 3 SHPO site numbers: 759 - 761 SPARTANBURG COUNTY-1 Description: Report (8 pp., includes appendices) includes project description, environmental setting, identification of historic resources, maps, and photographs; zero site forms with photographs; two items correspondence. Location: S108043, Box #24, Folder #716 Location of survey: Spartanburg Report title: Phase 1 Archaeological and Architectural Survey of the Matthew J.
    [Show full text]
  • Predictive Modeling: an Archeolgical Assessment of Duke Power Company's Proposed Cherokee Transmission Lines Veletta Canouts
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Archaeology and Anthropology, South Carolina Research Manuscript Series Institute of 10-1981 Predictive Modeling: An Archeolgical Assessment of Duke Power Company's Proposed Cherokee Transmission Lines Veletta Canouts Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/archanth_books Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Canouts, Veletta, "Predictive Modeling: An Archeolgical Assessment of Duke Power Company's Proposed Cherokee Transmission Lines" (1981). Research Manuscript Series. 173. https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/archanth_books/173 This Book is brought to you by the Archaeology and Anthropology, South Carolina Institute of at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Research Manuscript Series by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Predictive Modeling: An Archeolgical Assessment of Duke Power Company's Proposed Cherokee Transmission Lines Keywords Excavations, Duke Power Company, Transmission lines, Cherokee County, South Carolina, Archeology Disciplines Anthropology Publisher The outhS Carolina Institute of Archeology and Anthropology--University of South Carolina Comments In USC online Library catalog at: http://www.sc.edu/library/ This book is available at Scholar Commons: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/archanth_books/173 PREDICTIVE MODELING: AN ARCHEOLOG~CAL ASSESSMENT OF DUKE POWER COMPANY'S PROPOSED CHEROKEE TRANSMISSION LINES by Veletta Canouts Research Manuscript Series 181 With Contributions by Paul E. Brockington, Jr. and Tommy Charles INSTITUTE OF ARCHEOLOGY AND ANTHROPOLOGY UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA 29208 October 1981 The University of South Carolina offers equal opportunity in its employment, admissions and educational activities, in accordance with Title IX, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and other civil rights laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper French Broad Water Quality Management Plan
    UPPER FRENCH BROAD RIVER WATERSHED (06010105) OF THE TENNESSEE RIVER BASIN WATERSHED WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION DIVISION OF WATER POLLUTION CONTROL WATERSHED MANAGEMENT SECTION UPPER FRENCH BROAD RIVER WATERSHED WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Glossary Summary Chapter 1. Watershed Approach to Water Quality Chapter 2. Description of the Upper French Broad River Watershed Chapter 3. Water Quality Assessment of the Upper French Broad River Watershed Chapter 4. Point and Nonpoint Source Characterization of the Upper French Broad River Watershed Chapter 5. Water Quality Partnerships in the Upper French Broad River Watershed Chapter 6. Restoration Strategies Appendix I Appendix II Appendix III Appendix IV Appendix V Glossary GLOSSARY 1Q20. The lowest average 1 consecutive days flow with average recurrence frequency of once every 20 years. 30Q2. The lowest average 3 consecutive days flow with average recurrence frequency of once every 2 years. 7Q10. The lowest average 7 consecutive days flow with average recurrence frequency of once every 10 years. 303(d). The section of the federal Clean Water Act that requires a listing by states, territories, and authorized tribes of impaired waters, which do not meet the water quality standards that states, territories, and authorized tribes have set for them, even after point sources of pollution have installed the minimum required levels of pollution control technology. 305(b). The section of the federal Clean Water Act that requires EPA to assemble and submit a report to Congress on the condition of all water bodies across the Country as determined by a biennial collection of data and other information by States and Tribes.
    [Show full text]