NOAA TechnicalMemorandum NWS TPC-3

THE DEADLIEST, COSTLIEST, AND MOST INTENSE

UNITED STATES HURRICANES FROM 1900TO 2000

(AND OTHER FREQUENTLY REQUESTED HURRICANE FACTS)

Updated October 2001

Jerry D. Jarrell, TPC Miami (retired) Max Mayfield, TPC Miami Edward N. Rappaport, TPC Miami Christopher Landsea, HRD Miami

Tropical Prediction Center National Hurricane Center Miami, Florida

October 2001

UNITED STATES National Oceanicand AtmosphericAdministration National WeatherService DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE ConradC. Lautenbacher,Jr JohnJ. Kelly, Jr. Donald L. Evans, Secretary Under Secretaryand Administrator AssistantAdministrator for WeatherServices PREFACE

This version of the Deadliest, Costliest, and Most Intense United States Hurricanes from 1900 to 2000 extends the work of Hebert et al. (1997) through the 2000 season. Its also includes an estimate of the monetary loss that historical hurricanes could exact on the cun-entproperty-at-risk in the same location. Chris Landsea, of the NOAA Hurricane ResearchDivision of the Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory, hasjoined as a co-author to add this section. Ed Rappaport has also joined this effort, while Paul Hebert, in his retirement from NOAA, no longer contributes to this report. Infonnation for Hawaii, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands, given in Table 14. was provided by Hans Rosendal and Raphael Mojica of the Service ForecastOffices in Honolulu and San Juan, respectively.

This update was begun under the leadership of Jerry Jarrell until his retirement in early 2000. He continued to participate in retirement.

During 1995, the National Meteorological Center, which included the National Hurricane Center, was re-organized into the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP). Under NCEP, the National Hurricane Center becamethe Tropical Prediction Center (TPC), a name which more accurately reflects the broad scope of its responsibilities, and more formally publicizes that the majority of its operational products were for tropical weather events exclusive of hurricanes. The name "National Hurricane Center" was retained to apply to the hurricane operations desk at TPC. We will follow the convention where "NHC" refers to the previous National Hurricane Center, "TPC" refers to the current center and "TPC/NHC" refers to the hurricane operations desk ofTPC. THE DEADLIEST, COSTLIEST, AND MOST INTENSE UNITED STATES HURRICANES FROM 1900 TO 2000 (AND OTHER FREQUENTLY REQUESTED HURRICANE FACTS)

.by Jerry D. Jarrell(retired), Max Mayfield, and Edward N. Rappaport NOAA/NWSI Tropical Prediction Center Miami, Florida

ChristopherW. Landsea NOAA! AOML/Hurricane ResearchDivision Miami, Florida

ABSTRACT

This technical memorandum lists the thirty deadliest and costliest hurricanes in the United States from 1900-2000. The compilation ranks damage, as expressedby monetary losses, in three ways: 1) contemporary estimates; 2) contemporary estimates adjusted by inflation to 2000 dollars; and 3) contemporary estimates adjusted for inflation and the growth of population and personal wealth [pielke and Landsea, 1998]. In addition, the most intense (i.e., major) hurricanes to make landfall in the United States during the period 1900-2000 are listed. Some additional statistics on United Stateshurricanes of this and previous centuries, and tropical in general, are also presented.

1. INTRODUCnON

The staff of the Tropical Prediction Center receives numerous requests for statistical infontlation on deaths and damages,incurred during hurricanes affecting the United States. Infontlation about the intensity of these hurricanes is also frequently of interest. Estimates of these measures vary in the literature. Our hope is to present the best compilation of currently available estimates. In some instances, data in our lists representrevised estimates based on more complete infontlation received following earlier publications including previous versions of this technical memorandum.

There are other frequently asked questions about hurricanes, such as: What is the average number of hurricanes per year? What year(s) had the most and least hurricanes? What hurricane had the longest life? On what date did the earliest and latest hurricane occur? What was the most intense ? What was the largest number of hurricanes in existence on the same day? When was the last time a major hurricane or any hurricane hit a given community directly2? Answers to these and several other questions are provided in Section 3.

I A major hurricane is a category 3,4, or 5 hurricane on the Safflf/Simpson Hurricane Scale (see Table 1), and is comparable to a Great Hurricane in some other publications. 2 A direct hit means experiencing the core of strong winds and high tides of a hurricane.

1 Table 1. SaffirlSimpson Hurricane Scale [Simpson, R.H. (1974)].

Central Scale Number Pressure Winds Surge

1 >979 >28.91 74-95 4 to 5 Minimal

2 965-979 28.50-28.91 96-110 6 to 8 Moderate

3 945-964 27.91-28.47 111-130 9 to 12 Extensive

4 920-944 27.17-27.88 131-155 13to18 Extreme

5 < 920 < 27.17 > 155 >18 Catastrophic

2 2. BACKGROUND AND DEFINIllONS

Many of the statistics in this publication depend directly on the criteria used in preparing another study, "Hurricane Experience Levels of Coastal County Populations-Texas to Maine" [(Jarrell et al. (1992)]. The primary purpose of that study was to demonstrate, count)' by count)'. the lov.- hurricane experience level of a large majority of the population. Statistics show that the largest loss of life and, for the most part, property occur in locations experiencing the core of a categoI")" 3 or stronger hurricane.

The SafrIT/Simpsoncategory is defmed by pressure,wind, and stOmI surge. In nature, however. there is not a one-to-one relationship between these elements. Therefore, in practice, the TPC uses the maximum wind speed to establish the category. Operationally, however, the central pressure is often used to make a first estimate of the wind. Thereafter, available surface wind reports, aircraft reconnaissanceflight-level. winds (from which surface wind speed can be estimated), and dropwindsonde data are used to anchor the wind estimate. In post-stOmI analysis, the central pressure ranges of hurricanes on the SafrIT/SimpsonHurricane Scale will usually agree fairly well with the wind ranges in that category. On the other hand, the stOmI surge is strongly dependent on the slope of the continental shelf (shoaling factor). This can change the height of the surge by a factor of two for a given central pressure and/or maximum wind.

Heavy rainfall associated with a hurricane is nQ.tone of the criteria for categorizing.

The process of assigning a category number to a hurricane is subjective, as is TPC's estimate of a 's impact. It is made on a county by county basis. In this study, we applied the criteria for direct hit and indirect hit described in the work by Jarrell et at. (1992):

Direct Hit -Using "R" as the radius of maximum winds in a hurricane (the distance in miles from the storm's center to the circle of maximum winds around the center), all or parts of counties falling within approximately 2R to the right and R to the left of a storm's landfall point were usually considered to have received a direct hit (this assumesan observer at sea looking toward the shore.) If there was no landfall, the closest point of approach was used in place of the landfall point). On average, this direct hit zone extended about 50 miles along the coastline (R = 15 miles). Of course, some hurricanes were smaller than this and some, particularly at higher latitudes, were much larger. Cases were judged individually, and many borderline situations had to be resolved.

3 Indirect Hit -In general, areas on either side of the direct hit zone which received wind gusts of hurricane force and/or tides of at least 4 to 5 feet above non11alwere considered to have had an indirect hit. The evaluation subjectively incorporated a hurricane's strength and size, and the configuration of county coastlines.

The authors acknowledge that there are limitations to this technique. For example. the effect of an indirect hit by a large category 4 hurricane can be greater than that by a direct hit from a small category I hurricane.

Neumann et al. (1999) gives the variation in frequency along the United States coastline for all tropical storms and hurricanes, hurricanes only, and major hurricanes (category 3 or greater). In that study, counts were made of the number of tropical cyclones or hurricanes whose center passed within 75 nautical miles of the coastal location. This counting method thus includes near-misses, as well as direct and indirect hits as defined above.

Statistics on tropical stOnIl and hurricane activity in the North Atlantic Ocean (which includes the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean Sea) can be found in Neumann et al. (1999). A stratification of hurricanes by category which have affected coastal counties of the Gulf of Mexico and North Atlantic Ocean can be found in Jarrell et al. (1992). Additional infonIlation about the impact of hurricanes can be found in annual hurricane seasonarticles in Monthly Weather Review and StOnIl Data .

4 3. DISCUSSION Part I The remainder of this memorandum provides answersto some of the most frequently asked questions about the characteristics and impacts of the tropical cyclones to affect the United States from 1900-2000.

(1) What have been the deadliest hurricanes in the United States? Table 2 lists the 30 deadliest tropical cyclones to strike the U.S. mainland 1900-2000. Three hurricanes prior to 1900, a tropical storm which affected southern California in 1939 and the deadliest Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands hurricanes are listed as an addendum.

(2)- What have been the costliest hurricanes in the United States? Table 3 lists the 30 costliest tropical cyclones (includes 5 tropical storms) to strike the U.S. mainland 1900-2000. Figures are not adjusted for inflation. Table 3a re-orders some of these plus several other hurricanes after adjusting to 2000 dollars3. Hawaiian, easternPacific, Puerto Rican and Virgin Island tropical cyclones are listed as addendato Tables 3 and 3a. Table 3a also lists the thirty costliest hurricanes 1900-2000 assuming that a hurricane having the same track, size and intensity as noted in the historical record would strike the area with today' s population and property-at-risk (see Pielke and Landsea 1998.)

(3) What have beenthe most intense hurricanes to strike the United States? Table 4 lists the 65 major hurricaneswhich have struckthe U.S. mainland1900-2000. Hurricanesare ranked by estimatedcentral pressure at time of landfall. Hawaiian,Puerto Rican and Virgin Island hurricanesare listed as an addendato Table4. Many of the island hurricanesare closepasses, as opposedto landfalls as definedabove.

A look at the lists of deadliest and costliest hurricanes 1900-2000 reveals several striking facts: (1) Ten of the twelve deadliest hurricanes were the equivalent of a category 4 or higher. (2) Large death totals were primarily a result of the 15 to 20 feet or greater rise of the ocean (storm surge) associated with many of these major hurricanes. All but six of the ~rty deadliest hurricanes were major hurricanes. Four of those six were the inland flood-producing hurricanes Agnes, Diane and Floyd and tropical storm Alberto. (3) A large portion of the damage in two of the eight costliest tropical cyclones (Table 3) resulted from inland flooding caused by torrential . (4) Half of the deadliest hurricanes were category four or higher, but only one-sixth of the costliest hurricanes (Table 3) met this criterion. (5) Only one of the deadliest hurricanes occurred during the past twenty five years in contrast to two-thirds of the costliest hurricanes (this drops to two-fifths after adjustment for inflation and to one quarter after adjustment for inflation, population, and personal wealth).

Addendato Tables2, 3 and 4 include somenoteworthy storms from before 1900, from the U.S. West coastand the Hawaiianislands, as well as in the U. S. Caribbeanislands. The rank representsthe position they would occupyif included in the main table. ~ J Adjusted to 2000 dollars on basis of U.S. Departtnent of Commerce Implicit Price Deflator for Construction Available index numbers are rounded to the nearest tenth This rounding can result in slight changes in the adjusted damage of one hurricane ~Iative to others.

5 Table 2. The thirty deadliest mainland United States tropical cyclones 1900-2000

1 TX (Galveston) 2 FL (SE/Lake 0 keechobee) 3 FL (Keys)/S TX 4 New England 5 FL (Keys) 6 AUDREY (SW LA/N TX) 7 NE U.S. 8 LA (Grand Isle) 9 LA () 10 TX (Galveston) 11 CAMILLE (MS/SE LANA) 12 FL (M iam I)/M SIAL/Pensacola 13 DIANE (NE U.S.) 14 SE FL 15 M SIAL/Pensacola 16 AGNES (FL/NE U.S.) 17 HAZEL (SC/NC) 18 BETSY (SE FL/SE LA) 19 CAROL (NE U.S.) 20 FLOYD (Mid Atlantic & NE U.S.) 21 SE FL/SE LA/MS 22 DONNA (FL/Eastern U.S.) 22 GA/SC/NC 24 CARLA (N & Central TX) 25 TX (Velasco) 26 TX (Freeport) 26 STX 28 HILDA (Central LA) 29 SW LA 30 SW FL 30 ALBERTO (NW FL,GA,AL)

ADDENDUM (Pre.1900 or Not Atlantic/Gulf Coast) 2 LA 1893 Unk 2000 2-3 SC/GA 1893 Unk 1000-2000 3 GA/SC 1881 2 700 9 Puerto Rico 1928 4 312 13 U SVI. Puerto Rico 1932 2 225 17 DONNA (St. Thomas. VI) 1960 4 107 25 Southern California 1939 TS .45 25 ELOISE(Puerto Rico) 1975 TS' 44

.Could be as high as 10,000 to 12.000 .Moving more than 30 miles per hour .Over 500 lost on ships at sea; 600-900 estimated deaths C Some 344 of these lost on ships at sea. & Only of Tropical Storm intensity. Unk Intensity not sufficiently known to establish category

6 Table 3. The thir1y costliest mainland United States tropical cyclones. 1900-2000.

RANK HURRICANE YEAR CATEGORY DAMAGE (U.S.) , -, 1 ANDREW (SE FUSE LA) 1992 4 $26,500,000,000 2 HUGO (SC) 1989 4 7,000.000.000 3 FLOYD (Mid Atlantic & NE U.S.) 1999 2 4,500,000,000 4 FRAN (NC) 1996 3 3,200,000,000 5 OPAL (NW FUAL) 1995 3 3,000,000,000 6 GEORGES (FL Keys, MS,AL) 1998 2 2,310,000,000 7 FREDERIC (AL, MS) 1979 3 2,300,000,000 8 AGNES (FL./NE U.S.) 1972 1 2,100,000,000 9 ALICIA (N TX) 1983 3 2,000,000.000 10 BOB (NC, NE U.S) 1991 2 1,500,000.000 10 JUAN (LA) 1985 1 1,500.000.000 12 CAMILLE (MS/SE lA/VA) 1969 5 1,420,700,000 13 BETSY (SE FUSE LA) 1965 3 1,420,500,000 14 ELENA (MS/AUNW FL) 1985 3 1,250,000,000 15 GLORIA (Eastem U.S.) 1985 3. 900,000,000 16 DIANE (NEU.S.) 1955 1 831,700,000 17 BONNIE (NC,VA) 1998 2 720,000,000 18 ERIN (NW FL) 1995 2 700.000,000 19 ALLISON (N TX) 1989 TS c 500,000.000 19 ALBERTO (NW FL,GA,AL) 1994 TS c 500,000,000 19 FRANCES (TX) 1998 TS c 500,000,000 22 ELOISE (NW FL) 1975 3 490,000,000 23 CAROL (NE U.S.) 1954 3. 461,000,000 24 CELIA (S TX) 1970 3 453,000,000 25 CARLA (N & Central TX) 1961 4 408,000,000 26 CLAUDETTE (N TX) 1979 TS c 400,000.000 26 GORDON (S & Cent FL,NC) 1994 TS C 400,000,000 28 DONNA (FUEastem U.S.) 1960 4 387,000,000 29 DAVID (FUEastem U.S.) 1979 2 320,000.000 30 1938 3 .306,000.000

ADDENDUM (Rank is independent of other events in group) 4 GEORGES (USVI,PR) 1998 3 3,600,000,000 10 INIKI (Kauai. HI) 1992 Unk. 1,800,000.000 10 MARILYN (USVI, PR) 1995 2 1,500,000,000 15 HUGO (USVI, PR) 1989 4 1,000,000,000 19 HORTENSE (PR) 1996 1 500,000.000 29 LENNY (USVI. PR) 1999 4 330.000,000 29 OLIVIA (CA) 1982 T.D. & 325.000.000

30 IWA (Kauai, HI) 1982 Unk. 312,000,000 Notes: .Moving more than 30 miles per hour C Only of Tropical Storm intensity & Only a Tropical Depression

7 - .. 000000000000000000000000000000 c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o. o. o. ~ o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. c 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 = . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ c on . ~ O. O. O. O. O. O. O. O. O. ~ O. O. ~ O. ~ ~ O. O. O. O. O. O. O. O. O. O. O. O. O. ~ ..e - .!! ...~O O-~ -0 ~C"II)"'CII)N~ o eeo 0 ,,"'II)"'~ N ~ -c ~ C C C C') ..C') 01 N -0 C') 0 N -N e 01 -e C') ..01 eN.. C') -C') 01 ~ ~ - . ..; .c -CO-C')O~CII)NC~~CO~"",~II)O"C~O"""~OIC ~ ~~N~CC~..MNN~CC~~~~~~~...MMMNN (.)'C0Cc .c~0)0 0 e~~NNN Z 0~ ~C o..e0 ~ .c --Q. ~:: 'C Q) . P... ~:c . ... .!! II Q).!! CO) CO) ..CO) .."' CO) CO) CO) CO) CO) ..CO) N CO)N CO) CO) N - ~ -~Q) -~'C- 'D c -"' > C C C ~ Q)..e 0- ,,- "w . -~ C c co N 0 V) ...e e V) 0 0) N '" 0) V) 0) 0) 0) ...0) 0 ...e V) ...V) ~"5 .!! 0 No)O-"""NCOCOCO...V)eV).co"' eO)...~O)O)~e -~ C 0)0)00)0)0)0)0)0)0)0)0)0)0)0)0)0)0)0)0)0)0)0)0)0)0)0)0)0)0) :! ~ ~ ~ -~ --- _-~II ..! . UOO" ~ =Q..cCIIg.~ II"' 0. E _IIQ)-o~~~ 0 ~ m A. -g.-- 0 ~ e C 11- ,0 -m (.)O",~C 0 -0 .--: ,0- 0 C O=Q)onll~ - ':' 0 -'< .c~-~~:i (/)«/) «/)8m c-' -'~> -w-,~(,) 1-(,) -~ II",~-""Co "'on U D~ =:~~~~=~~-~~~~=~'" m2m Z~~~(,)~W~ >- ~>ee~a~- W --~ -.~~~e- -_ZZ~~ ~cEII- u .: .o~ ~c ~~..-W~(/)Z=WWOO~~W~Q~.~>~~~~O~~WmmoC~><-'~ ~~~~~~W~m Q ~..Joo- .. .~ C ~ 0 ~ 'D ~O88~~~I-Z~2~~~~~N~~W~~2o~~~~w~ oo>Ec00 0 - Co WZ~I-~~wwO<~~~~W~~WW~WI-~~WO~~~~ 0 0 ~ ~ .~ NN2c:1 "' -.. ~ 000.0 c O~O~m~NOOO~N~~O.~~~CN~mNOC~~m~ O~ON.C~cgOOcc~mo..oo~~~~cgoomcg~m OON...O ~ 0 ~ 0 0 ~ -~ ~ 0 0 0 -~ 0 0 C .N N N ~ ~ ~ N 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0. 0. ~ N. O. So ~oom~m~~OOmOMOO~mMM~NNMmO~NN~O 00001)0 .. NNOC.~N-COmcg.comc~~~c.~.~~.NmC 00-01)0 E C C ~ C .~ ~ C ~ .~ cg .~ C ~ C ~ ~ cg ~ 0 N GO N N ~ -0 - 0. tD.-."'. O. .~NmNO~mmOO~.o.m~~~.om.O~~~MOm mo.""" .. ~~o-m.cgcg.~NN~~GO-O--O-~..C~N-"'N mmNm- m~~~GO~GOcg~cg~.-~...OOOGO~~~..N-GOGO m. -.co. N. N. ~ .. .~mmm~...MMMMNNNNNNN~~~~~~~~ "'N--- 0 ~ u "f; :5 . ..~~~~~N~~~~~.N~.~~N...N~~~~.. "'..oN.. II .~ c .c ! ~ ... ~ .. ~N"'a."'~a.CCD""""-C"'OO"'-"CD"""""""""'O mNoI)O)m '" c. C"'CDCD"'...a a.a.C"'CDa.CCD"'Ca."'N-C"'C"~"O ~~~mN ~a.~~a.a.a.a.a.~a.a.~a.a.a.a.a.a.a.a.a.a.~a.a.a.a.~ ~~~O)~ .! 0 ~ I/) .c 0 .. 0 N .:m :::i ':; ... --w <.~ ~ .~ < < Z -U) U) -v, > -~~ :::i'" ~ ~ -~ -<- U) ~W w "...< -U -., C IV " Q: a- ..Z I/) I/) ...U) = IV >- ~ > -_ a- . c 4( -"W -~ ~ ~ > 0 :> 'U ...:> W_~C ...~C~ -zU) U- -C - --1£1- ~- ...~I/) "-..! < U)~ ., _-IVC ...~ -U) C >---Q: a: W U)"'- IV "':>U"O ~ X~O W Z...I/)~« "' -~U...X W-a-~ a: 1/)-- ~~-~~... -0- -X- -~""'~. <~ ~ :~>~(1)-- ~ (1)---(1) ~i -u~~-w2~~o~~~zU)-~~~z,~~~w~~ ~...~ I£I;~~~ ~~--~~~-=zz~--~S ~-U-E.~ ~WIV ~~>---= ~ I/)~w ~QC-- w~~-~ ~ZwlV~ ~~I/)~~~ ~O~I/)=~Q~W'Zw~Ow~'Z'Z~'Z-~~-~~~Q~'Z~~'Z~O~~~2~~O~'Zw~~N-X~OO~~"'x "w Q::-=O~ O~Q:~c 'Z~~~~~~w~~~w~~~~OWwO~...~Owww~w~ ~I£I~<~~ ~~~~UQ~~Z~O~UU~~QU~~~"'ZQ~~z~U)z ~~-~~cn ~ C z -N"'.. "'CD "'Ca. 0 -N"'" "'~...C a.O -N '" CD'" Ca. 0 zom",...m < NNNNNNNNNN... W--NNN ~ Q - ~ 16 a:= ~ '6 O~ c '"'"' "C.c . . .§ ~ WmMMMMMMMMMMMMMM~MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM ~ G> '" II) ~ ~0 -00) :s .5 G) 'Ui 5 .~ -; 0 N"'Il).C>"'~N--C')O~.-OO~Il)Il)C>~Il).C').~a: 1"'.C>NIl)C>-..C>CCIl)OCC~OC')C>O-"'C>CCIl).Il)C')C')Il)..~CC 0"'-0" E oC-oG)~c- ~ WC>C>C>C>C>C>C>C>C>C>C>C>C>C>C>C>C>C>C>C>C>C>C>C>C>C>C>C>C>C>C>C>C> ~._~"' > .~ 0.>-.-G)~E~ ~ :5 ~.cUi.. $-oG);:?:- ;a -~ c 81 G> -5'E i E!Eoo c °UiG)~ "'~",G) ~ < iij~ 5:- - c-~~ u _oJ _.="5>,:j' Zuj < "E Xiij >occ '"- _::J. <:: ~~~~ ~ w~=u -~~w >,:j' ~ ~~ xu~ ~ oCo"u .c z~c~~ xm~~ ->'"- ~w -~z'"- '"- -=.8z~ G) v . % ~~£~~ ;~~~ ~~~5 ~~ ~~~~~~~5w EQB-o~ Q)G) E O)~=-=~ >- CG)"'G) c ~~~~~~~~~~~~5;~5~ ~~x~x~~~~~~~2~2~ --oC "' 0. 0 ~W~~XW~~OI~~ II) x~~~~~~,"-uw~~w~u~~z,"-wzzz~wuQw ~ '" ;a ~~N~N~~O ~~O-NN~~~~~~~~~=~~~~~ .-OO~=.~ ~~~ONNN~~~~~~~~ N~.~~~~~ >-- 'C a:= c O.!! ~ ~-g .:0... ..+ C W~~~..."" "...~~""~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ...~~'G"~~ 16 '<"ii ZZ Z E U- ~~ ~ G> II) C

G> ~8 ~-~~.~N~~~~OO~~.~~~~~~.~ ~~~N~ON~ :s $~~N~~O_~~~-N~ -~~N~.~~~~-~~~~.O~N~--~~ ~N~~~~~~ W~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ 'Ui > ~ ~ G> .c l- «--'":- '" x "8~ -a: - - ~ ..J -~ I- ~ '":- X -~ a: . WC C "'I- .~ G> '" ~E "'ffi ~ ~ Z Cii S -., 05 :c .., OC .=.., -.,. W a: ~ ~ w~ ~~ 0~ ~ '" ~~, ~ '" -~-=E-> I- ~~X~~--~ U~ ~G~ ~~~- :J:J a:- "'WI-Q)W~Q)tO "'Z.,. ~~~~-- < ~ ~ a: 05~~~~'" ~ ~ ~~",~2~~~05G~U~ ~~~~~~-g; W~ G ~O~~<~~<; u"'-~,,~<-".~~O_~"OOZ"'.- ~~~-- E -","'w ~z'->::,-oQ:.-~~~'~"'~- "'~-z Z-c ~",8.~~<~~w~~ <~ ~~jW~~~~~Q)SO~~:J --W"'ffi~~~w"'U>-:J~ ~< zC~O--~~Q: a:~~~~~~~~~Q:~~~~x~i~~~~~~~~~~~x~~x~~~~~~~ 0 ~~<~~~ox«<~~~wl-~~~xw~Q)Q:wuwwwl-"'Sl-o<~~~oo~w ~~t.)<~~QI-..J.JU"J:~"J:",z~O

The data indicate that an average of 2 major hurricanes every 3 years made landfall somewhere along the U.S. Gulf or Atlantic coast. (When all categories were combined, about 5 hurricanes made landfall every 3 years.)

One-of the greatest concerns of the National Weather Service's (NWS) hurricane preparednessofficials is that in a hurricane becauseof our advanced technolo~. Max Mayfield, spokesman for the NWS hurricane warning service and Director of TPC, as well as fonDer NHC Directors, have repeatedly emphasized the great danger of a catastrophic loss of life in a future hurricane if proper preparednessplans for vulnerable areas are not fonnulated, maintained and executed.

The study by Jarrell et al. (1992)used 1990 censusdata to estimatethat 85% of U.S. coastal residentsfrom Texasto Maine had ~ experienceda direct hit by a major hurricane. Many of those45 million residentshad movedto coastalsections during the pasttwenty-five years. Even the landfalls of Andrew, Hugo, Opal, Fran and Bret have not lessenedan ever growing concern broughtby the continuedincrease in coastalpopulations.

Table 5, which lists hurricanesby decadessince 1900,shows that during the twenty year period 1960-1979both the numberand intensityof landfalling U.S. hurricanesdecreased sharply! Basedon 1900-1959statistics, the expectednumber of hurricanesand major hUITicanesduring the period 1960-1979was 36 and 15, respectively. But, in fact, only 27 (or 75%) of the expected numberof hurricanesstruck the U.S. with only 10 major hurricanesor 67% of that expected number. The decadeof the eightiesshowed little changeto this trend. Even the decadeof the nineties,showed below averagelandfall frequencies.It could be noted that of the most recent four decades,only the 70's and 90's were significantly below nonnal.

On the average, a category 4 or stronger hurricane strikes the United States once every 6 years. Even though two category 4 hurricanes struck within three years, (Hugo in 1989 and Andrew in 1992), they represent the only category 4 hurricanes since 1969. Fewer hurricanes in a year do not necessarily mean a lesser threat of disaster, however. The 1919 hurricane, which is both the third deadliest and fourth most intense to strike the United States beginning 1900, occurred in a year which had a total of only three storms/hurricanes. Records for the most intense U.S. hurricane in 1935, and the costliest, Andrew in 1992, occurred in years which had only six tropical storms or hurricanes.

10 A large death toll in a U.S. hurricane is still Table 5. Number of hurricanes by category to strike the mainland U.S. possible. The decreased each decade. (Updated from Hebert et al.. 1997) death totals in recent years may be as much a result of ALL lack of major hurricanes Category ~ DECADE 1 2 3 4 5 1.2.3.4.5 3.4.5 striking the most vulnerable areas as they 1900-1909 5 4 4 2 0 15 6 are of any fail-proof 1910-1919 9 3 5 3 0 20 8 forecasting, warning, and 1920-1929 6 4 3 2 0 15 5 1930-1939 4 5 6 1 1 17 8 observing systems. 1940-1949 7 8 7 1 0 23 8 1950-1959 8 1 7 2 0 18 9 Continued coastal growth 1960-1969 4 5 3 2 1 15 6 and inflation will almost 1970-1979 6 2 4 0 0 12 4 certainly result in every 1980-1989 9 1 5 1 0 16 6 future major landfalling 1990-1999 3 6 4 1 0 14 5 hurricane (and even 2000-2009 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 weaker hurricanes and 1900-1999 61 39 48 15 2 165 65 tropical storms) replacing one of the current costliest Note: Only the highest category to affect the U.S. has beer) used hurricanes.

If warnings are heeded and preparednessplans developed, the death toll can be reduced. In the absence of a change of attitude or laws restricting building near the ocean, however, large property losses are inevitable.

11 Part II

This sectionanswers some frequently asked questions about tropical stonn and hunicane activity.

(1) What is the average TaJe 6. ~ ruTt8"ci trqJc3c.)OOe Mdl ~ starn~ number of hurricanes per h..ITica-e~ fcr vaia.6~. ~e:j frtm t..e.JTBm8 cI. (1~). year? Table 6 gives the average number of tropical cyclones which reached storm strength and hunoicanestrength during selected time periods. A total of ten tropical cyclones reaching storm strength with six of these becoming hunoicanesappears to be the best averagesto use based on the past 10 to 50 year time periods when adequate observing systems were in place.

(2) What year(s) have had the most Table7 Yearsmaximum and minimum tropical cyck>ne and hurrM;ane activity .? in theNonh Atlantic, Caribbean, and Gulf of Mexico1871.2000 Updated from and least hurncanes. Neumannetal. (1999) Note, some activity undoubtely not observed inearly Table 7 shows the years of maximum years. and minimum tropical cyclone and hurricane activity for the Atlantic hurricane basin. The only years after 1900 when a hurricane failed to strike the U.S. mainland were 1902, 1905, 1907, 1914, 1922, 1927, 1930, 1931, 1937, 1951, 1958, 1962, 1973, 1978,1981,1982,1990,1994 and 2000. Note that only twice has the U.S. mainland gone as long as two years without a hurricane. The most hurricanes to strike in one year were six in 1916 and 1985. There were five in 1933, and four in 1906, 1909, and 1964. Three hurricanes struck the U.S. in one year a total of sixteen times. Ten of these sixteen times occurred during the sixteen years from 1944 to 1959!

13 (3) When did the earliest and latest hurricanes occur? The hurricane seasonis defined as June 1 through November 30. An early hurricane can be defmed as occurring in the three months prior to the start of the season,and a late hurricane can be defined as occurring in the three months after the season. With these criteria the earliest observed hurricane in the Atlantic was on March 7, 1908, while the latest observed hurricane was on December 31. 1954. the second "Alice" of that year which persisted as a hurricane until Janu8r)' 5, 1955. The earliest hurricane to strike the United States since 1900 was Alma which struck northwest Florida on June 9. 1966. The latest hurricane to strike the United States was late on November 30, 1925 near Tampa. Florida.

(4) What were the longest-lived and shortest-lived hurricanes? Ginger in 1971 holds the recor.d for most days as a hurricane (20) and tropical cyclone (28) (includes depression stage). Many tropical cyclones remained at hurricane intensity for 12 hours or less.

(5) What were the strongest and weakesthurricanes? In termsof centralpressure (and probablywinds), the strongestobserved hurricane in the Atlantic basin was Gilbert in 1988with a pressureof 888 millibars in the northwestCaribbean. The 1935 Labor Day hurricanein the Florida Keys, with a pressureof 892 millibars, was the most intensehurricane to strike the United States. Numeroushurricanes have reached only the Ininimum wind speednear 74 miles per hour and severalhave struckthe United States.

(6) How many hurricanes have there been in each month? Table 8, adapted from Neumann et al. (1999), shows the total and average number of tropical cyclones, and those which became hum canes, by month, for the period 1944-2000. It also shows the monthly total and average number of hum canes to strike the United States since 1900 (updated from Hebert et aI., 1997).

Table 8. Tropical storms and hurricanes in the Atlantic. Caribbean and Gulf of Mexico by month of origin, (updated from Neumann et al. (1999)]. and for hurricanes striking the U.S. mainland 1900-2000 (updated from Hebert et al. (1997)].

1944-2000 1944-2000 1900-2000 TROPICAL STORMS HURRICANES U.S. HURRICANES AND HURRICANES

MONTH Total Average Total Average Total Average JANUARY-APRIL 3 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.00 MAY 8 0.1 2 .0 0.00 JUNE 31 0.5 11 0.2 11 0.11 JULY 50 0.9 22 0.4 18 0.18 AUGUST 151 2.6 95 1.6 42 0.42 SEPTEMBER 198 3.5 129 2.3 65 0.64 OCTOBER 100 1.8 60 1.1 25 0.25 NOVEMBER 26 0.5 16 0.3 4 0.04 DECEMBER 4 0.1 2 .0 0.00

YEAR 571 10.0 337 5.9 165 1.63

Includes subtropical storms after 1967 ~)ee Neumann et al. (1999) for details .Less than 0.05.

14 (7) What was the largest number of hurricanes in the Atlantic Ocean at the same time? According to information on the current version of the master data file of Neumann et al. (1999). until September25, 1998 there had not been four hurricanes in the North Atlantic at the same time in over 100 years. Hurricanes Georges, Ivan, Jeanneand Karl persisted into September2Th. 1998 as hurricanes. One hundred five years earlier, on August 22, 1893 four hurricanes co-existed, one of them killing an estimated 1,000-2,000 people in Georgia-South Carolina. On September 11, 1961, three hurricanes and possibly a fourth occurred simultaneously. The onl)" other years after 1900 with three hurricanes on the map at the same time were 1950 and 1967" In 1971 from September 10 to 12, there were five tropical cyclones at the same time; however. while most of these ultimately achieved hurricane intensity, there were never more than two hurricanes at anyone time.

(8) How many direct hits by hurricanes of various categorieshave affected eachstate? Table 9, updatedfrom Hebertet al. (1997),shows the numberof hurricanesaffecting (direct hits) the United Statesand individual states. The'table shows that, on the average,close to ~ hurricaneseveD: three years (1.63 per year)strike the United States,while two major hurricanes crossthe U.S. coast everythree years (0.64 per year). Othernoteworthy facts, updatedfrom Hebertet al. (1997),are: 1.) Thirty-six percentof all U.S. hurricaneshit Florida; 2.) Seventy- six percentof category4 or higherhurricanes have hit eitherFlorida or Texas; 3.) Approximately half the hurricanesto strike the middle Gulf coast,southern Florida and New York were major hurricanes.

Tab Ie 9. H u rric 8 n e dire c I hils 0 n Ih e m 8 in 18 n d U. S co 8 I Ilin e 8 n d fo r in d iv id U 8 I I la Ie S 1900 -2 0 0 0 by Sa ffirlS im pion C a Ie gory. Up d 8 Ie d fro m H e b e rl e I a I. (1887)

MAJOR CATEGORY NUMBER ALL HURRICANES AREA 1 2 3 4 5

U.S(TexastoMaine) 61 39 46 15 2 165 65

Texas 12 9 10 6 0 37 16 (N 0 rth) 7 3 3 4 0 17 7 (Central) 2 2 1 1 0 6 2 (South) 3 4 6 1 0 14 7 Louisiana 9 5 8 3 1 26 12 Mississippi 1 2 5 0 1 9 6 A la b a m a 5 2 5 0 0 1 2 5 Florida 19 17 17 6 1 60 24 (Northwest) 10 8 7 0 0 25 7 (N ortheast) 2 7 0 0 0 9 0 (Southwest) 7 3 6 2 1 19 8 (Southeast) 6 11 7 4 0 28 11 G eo rg ia 1 4 0 0 0 5 0 Sou th C a ro lin a 6 4 2 2 0 1 4 4 North C a ro lin a 1 0 6 1 0 1. 0 27 1 1 Virginia 2 1 1. 0 0 4 1 . Maryland 0 1. 0 0 0 1 .0 De la w 8 re 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 New J e r. e y 1. 0 0 0 0 1 .0 New York 3 l' 5. 0 0 9 5 . Connecticut 2 3' 3. 0 0 8 3 . Rhode 1.land 0 2. 3. 0 0 5 .3 . Massachusetts 2 2' 2. 0 0 6 2 . New Hampshire 1.1.0 0 0 2. 0 M a in e 5. 0 0 0 0 5 0 Note s .Indicate. all hurricane. in this group were moving faster than 30 m ph. State totals will not equal U S totals. and Texas or Florida totals will not nece.s8rlly equ81sum of section81 tot8ls.

15 (9) When are the m!i..qr hurricanes likely to strike given areas? Table 10 shows the incidence of major hurricanes by months for the U.S. mainland and individual states. For the United States, September has had more major hurricanes than all other months combined. However, four of the most devastating hurricanes did D.Q!occur in September--Andrew (August 1992), Camille (August 1969), Audrey (June 1957), and Hazel (October 1954). Only in Texas and Louisiana are major hurricanes in August and September almost an equal threat. Most major October hurricanes occur in southern Florida.

Table 10. Incidence of major hurricane direct hits on the U.S. mainland and individual states, 1900-2000, by Saffir/Simpson category. Updated from Hebert et al. (1997).

AREA JUNE JULY AUG. SEPT. OCT. ALL

U.S. (Texas to Maine) 2 3 16 36 8 65

Texas 1 1 8 6 16 (North) 1 1 3 2 7 (Central) 1 1 2 (South) 4 3 7 Louisiana 2 4 5 1 12 Mississippi 1 1 4 6 Alabama 1 4 5 Florida 1 2 15 6 24 (Northwest) 1 5 1 7 (Northeast) 0 (Southwest) 1 5 3 9 (Southeast) 2 7 2 11 Georgia 0 South Carolina 3 1 4 North Carolina 2 8 1 11 Virginia 1 1 Maryland 0 Delaware 0 New Jersey 0 New York 1 4 5 Connecticut 1 2 3 Rhode Island 1 2 3 Massachusetts 2 2 New Hampshire 0 Maine 0

Note: State totals do not equal U.S. totals and Texas or Florida totals do not necessarily equal the sum of sectional entries.

16 10 ) How long has it been since a hurricane or a major hurricane hit a given communif.'"? A chronological list of all hurricanes to strike the United States 1900 through 1990 including month, states affected by category, and minimum sea level pressure at landfall can be found in Jarrell et al. (1992). Table 11 extends that listing through 2000. Table 12 summarizes the occurrence of the last major hurricane or of any hurricane to directly hit the more populated coastal communities from Brownsville, Texas to Eastport, Maine. In addition. if a hurricane indirectly affected a community:gf!g the last direct hit, it is listed in the last column of the table. In order to obtain the same type of information listed in Table 12 for the remaining coastal communities, the reader is again referred to Jarrell et al. (1992).

Table 11 C hronologicallist of all hurricanes which affected the U.S. 1991-1999. including category by state. This is a continuation of a comparable table covering the years 1900- 1990 given in Jarrell et al (1992)

There many illustrative examples of the uncertainty of when a hurricane might strike a given locality. After a period of nearly 70 years without a direct hit, Pensacola, Florida was hit directly by hurricane Erin and indirectly by major hurricane Opal during a two month period in 1995.

Miami, which expects a major hurricane every nine years, on average, was struck by a major hurricane in 1992 for the first time since 1950. Tampa hasn't experienced a major hurricane since 1921 years. Many locations along the Gulf and Atlantic coasts have not experienced a major hurricane during the period 1900-2000 (see Table 12).

(11) What is the total United States damage (before and after adjustment for inflation) and death toll for each year since 1900? Table 13 summarizes this infonnation. Table 13a ranks the top 30 years by deaths, by unadjusted damage and by adjusted damage. In most years the death and damage totals are the result of a single, major hurricane. Gentry (1966) gives damages adjusted to 1957-59 costs as a base for the period 1915-1965. For the most part, death and damage totals for the period 1915-1965 were taken from Gentry's paper, and for the remaining years from the Monthly Weather Review. Adjusted damageswere converted to 2000 dollars by the factors used in Table 3a.

17 II) III 'C 'c "C .~ II) Ia o"E "&; .!! ~ >- "> .c C)c ~ >- N .c IV ~ 0 ~ Q) Q) ..2 Ia "'ii 0 .Q :I: c C Q m :%:0 0 " ~ m m ~ -~u- Q) II) co.. .: ~ 0) "O-J .--0) ~ m ~ 10 ~ :2:2 0"'Qj"C"C >-"c.c ~ ~~ ~~~~ ~ CIOIOC -- ~~=~oo> > DIN >->-= e 00>-C "C .c .:; "C .c .c § "C .:; 'E m >- 000 .20.2.2000.2.20) -, C)C)C) OO:l::I:~~UJ~U "C)""C)C)O""" E ~ 0 in .:: IV '0~ -JI -; ~ '0 I c. ~ u C/O !! 'in is ~ --fa .c &~CC~ 0 0 c "E ~ ~caeeE jijjij-g ~ "iij _ZZu.u.w (,)(,)w ~. ~ -- c. in ooooooo~~~~~~~oooooooo MMMMMOOOO .E cg OOOOOOO~~~~~M~OOOOOOOO ==;;:-;;:-;;:-0000 .c -I ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ MM It) It) It) a> a> a> a> Co >. v v v v v v v ~~~~~~~ v v v v v v v V. a>a>a>a>a> ...vvvv E 0 0 01 .Co M ~ U >-"'.Co.Co;?;o -; .CoG) m .Co ~cau U -§C Gi U u.E.!?ca '0 u u~ca >- mC ;?;oU-OC G) .Co > m~~.E~.Co ~ § ~ §'O~~ ~ c.Co 0 ~U~ ~ 0 E 'O ~~ u'O ~ ca~c'O-ca--m-caca u -0;; C Oco O'O~ 01 C/O c: ! "> "E 0 ~ ~ 8{~~~~~~~~{~~i~~!~I~~~i~~i~~~~~~~ oca_~G)2ca=.Co>-s:oca,:oucaG»ca=Q)~cc"Ce:caoooca E u uc~~u.m~zu~>~u>zOm~>uzzm~um~~w E '0 !! 8 ca ca >- ~ C :E -G) U ca '" m ,§ ~ 'O!! ~-E= "Ui Q. "in ~ 0 0 ca C ca G) 0 U -E m e' ~ ~ c ~ ~ ~ >- ~ ~1Ii caG) 0 .. u .!!I~ 0 U u "61 ~ ~ ~ ~ C 0'" Z.E GI c. ..: ca C G) C 0 ~ ca .ca '0 S..Q -0 ~ (/)LL (!) U) ~ ~ ~ 0 Z Z U ~~ z~ z -; "5 00 c. - c.0

c U) S ~ > C iij m :I: c ~fa C- C- ~u -10 -. o o Q) III -; .: 10 ~ ~-I c C m .g~ .c

.2- m > E ~ m c( 0 in CD ~ --'I c !J .g ~ :f .c u >. ~ c >-~c&1 &1&1 >-Ialalala Ia Iala ~&1 m ~ >. ~~~~~~ -6-6EE?cCCC "i6c~ §§-6° .c 5 =&1&1~== :OCIa&1.9l.J!.9l..9l. c..9l.1a 00 c.E ~ ~°iij' UI """ """ >-la" 'Om C :0 ~Ia .2:' c"3 Ia ~-Ia:O ..~ IV -u; ~~"'~ C --laC "S IaU8"'.g ~ -~E ~u GI m E .oJ .:;C;i5t:.sc66~1a~~ & 81a:E~~ -5~WI~ i~ ~~ 0 0 e:o3:E..J_t:Q:~ Q) co.. ~e-t:SG>:?:o~E..:o~>-S",:Ccc"i6EQ..E!2t:Q.>-Iat:fI)~t:.. .- ~ .-v ~ (3 muQ..~~~zmu~zzmmQ..~Q..Q..~~>eoo~!!caO&1Ia~O&1ca=Ia~"Iac.o":la~oca&1~o~.3oG) :E m I- Ia Q. IaC .g.'" IaEla ;,; Q) ;" ~:0 ~'" 2.~_ I) E G> 0.- ~ -0 "0 ffl 1 ~ od:~ z 19 Table 13a. As in Table 13. but for the thii1y deadliest and costliest years from 1900-2000.

Ranked on Ranked on Ranked by Ranked on Deaths Unadjusted Damage Adjusted1 Damage NormalizedL Damage y~ ($ Millions) . Year Deaths Year ($ Millio~ Year ~ Millions) 8.000 + 1 1900 11926 89,676 2 1928 1.836 21992 39,896 3 1938 600 3 1900 32,090 4 1915 550 41915 28,503 5 1935 414 5 1944 28,322 6 1909 406 6 1954 21,121 7 1957 400 71938 20,057 .8 1906 298 81928 16,632 9 1919 91955 15,906 10 1926 269 10 1965 15,308 11 1969 256 11 1960 14,717 12 1955 218 12 1969 13,219 13 1954 193 13 1947 12,990 14 1972 122 141972 12,923 15 1916 107 151989 12,422 16 1965 75 161979 10,414 17 1960 65 171961 8,635 18 1944 64 18 1945 8,512 19 1933 63 19 1964 8.499 20 1999 62 201903 8,317 21 1989 56 21 1985 7,921 22 1966 54 221949 7,443 23 1947 53 231919 6,448 24 1940 51 24 1999 5,753 25 1964 49 251906 4,906 26 1961 46 261983 4,890 27 1932 40 271995 4,493 28 1994 38 281916 4,340 29 1978 36 29 1996 4,201 30 1996 36 301933 4,182

+ Could have been as high as 10,000 to 12,~)Q. 1 Adjusted to 2000 dollars based on U.S. De~)artment of Commerce Implicit Price Deflator for Construction. 2 Using 1915 cost adjustment -none available prior to 1915. 3 Considered too high in 1915 reference. S Figures do not agree with Table 2 because deaths at sea are not included here. L Landsea normalization reflects inflation, chclnges in personal wealth and coastal county population

to 2000 (Pielke and Landsea 1998).

20 12) Are there hurricane cycles? Figures 1 through 10 show the landfalling portion of the tracks of major hurricanes that have struck the United States 1900-1999 (there were no major hurricane strikes on the United States in 2000). The reader might note the tendency for the major hurricane landfalls to cluster in certain areas during certain decades. Another interesting point is the tendency for this clustering to occur in the latter half of individual decadesin one area and in the first half of individual decadesin another area. During the very active period of the thirties this clustering is not apparent.

A comparison of twenty-year periods b,:ginning in 1901 indicates that the major hurricanes tended to be in the western Gulf Coast states at thle beginning of the 20thcentury, shifting to the easternGulf Coast states and Florida during the neX1:twenty years, then to Florida and the Atlantic Coast states during the forties and fifties, and back to the western Gulf Coast states in the sixties and seventies.

(13) What are the death and damage statistics for Hawaii, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands? Table 141ists some of the de~ldlie~t,costliest and most intense tropical cyclones to affect the islands. The Saffir/Simpson hurric2lnescale and the empirical Atlantic wind pressure relationship do not strictly apply in the Hawaiian arc~a,and thus, hurricanes are not readily comparable to those of the Atlantic basin. In both island areas, some minimum pressure values appear inconsistent with the given wind values. This is largely attributable to the given minimum and maximum winds not necessarily being the extremes in the htlrricane.

21 1000W 95°W 900W 85°W 8COW 75°W 700W 65°W 6COW 45°N 45°N

(~ CATEGORY 3) 1901.1910 .l ~

400N I 40orIJ

-"1"

35°N 35°N ~~-:...J..J 1906' .

190~- ~ 300N 300N "':" . 1909 : :\\:

~ L 25°N ... 25°N ... ..- 200N 200N 100oW 95°W 900W 85DW 8COW 75DW 700W 65°W 60oW

Figure 1. Landfa11ingUnited Statesmajor hurricanes(stronger than or equalto a category3) during the period 1901-1910.

1000W 95°W 90oW 85°W 80oW 75°W 70oW 65°W 60oW 45°N I I "'" I vr r~ 1 I ..45°N MAJORU.S. HURRICANES.J . (~ CATEGORY 3) 1911-1920 ::jJ 400N 400N

35°N 35°N

300N 300N 1911 /.~ 1916~ \ -""'...J 25°N ~} l '., , 25°N 1916 " - , d :~:,". 20oN 20oN 100oW 9SoW 90oW 8SoW 80oW 7SoW 70-W 6S.W 60.W

Figure 2. Landfalling United States major hurricanes (stronger than or equal to a category 3) during the period 1911-1920.

22 1000W 95°W 900W 85°W 800W 75°W 7QOW 65DW 600W 45°N i 145°N ~ (~ CATEGORY 3) 1921-1930

400N 400N I Or I

...~ *'f' 35°N 35°N u 300N 300N

1926 25°N 25°N -r1~.o~ , T )'-1126' ,~ \ I 0,".,... ~ '~o 0" .-]. : od ' J"- 200N 200N 100oW 95°W 90.W 85°W 8COW 75°W 70.W 65°W 60oW

Figure 3. Landfalling United States major hurricanes (stronger than or equal to a category 3) during the period 1921-1930.

1000W 95°W 900W 85°W 8COW 75°W 700W 65°W 6COW

45°N 1938(' 45°N ..-Mi

400N 400N ilJ:' 19331

35°N 1938 35°N

1933

300N 300N ~ ...".. 19:16 ," " ." .. 1933 .1834 25°N 1832 2SDN

'J"- . .:~ .d .,' 200N 20"N 100oW 95°W 900W 85°W scow 75°W 700W 65°W 60oW Figure4. Landfalling United Statesmajor hurricanes(stronger than or equalto a category3) during the period 1931-1940.

23

+-1921 1000W 95DW 900W 85°W 8COW 75°W 70.W 65°W 600W 45°N f- I~/~~. 45°N

(~ CATEGORY 3) 1941-1950 400N 400N

35°N 35°N 19~9

300N 300N

~ ~. . 25°N -1M7 25°N I '... ..1942 ,;~" 1841\ ~-..-.1948

20oN -..'..';' EASY I ~~~. .d.~: "": I ..20oN

100oW 9S.W 90-W 8SoW SooW 7S.W 70.W 6S.W 60oW

Figure 5. Landfalling United States major hurricanes (stronger than or equal to a category 3) during the period 1941-1950.

700W 6S.W 600W 4soN

1954

400N

"..," " 35°N '"'""" ~ 35°N

Figure 6. Landfalling United States major hunicanes (stronger than or equal to a category 3) during the period 1951-1960.

24 ~I 1000W 95°W 900W 85"W 8COW 75°W 700W 65°W 600W 45°N 45°N

400N 400N

35°N 35°N

300N 300N CELI~ 1&70 , ~H~ BEUL .I" "'"- 0 196 r .~ .I 0 .,~ Srny . 25°N -1 ~ " I ~ .1966 .\ I .0 .~~~ 25°N BEULAH ~.., 0 .0' .. 1HZ, ...0 0 0 -~. ..0'. \ ~.-:~. .J ~ 20oN ".""--'":";l..'..J.' ,.d.. 20oN 100oW 9S.W 90oW 8S.'W 80.W 7S.W 70.W 6S.W 60oW

Figure 7. Landfalling United Statesmajor hurricanes(stronger than or equal to a category3) during the period 1961-1970.

100.W 95°W 900W 8S.W 80.W 75°W 70.W 65°W 600W 4S.N .. 45°N

(~ CATEGORY 3) 1971-1980 ::-r

400N 40DN

35°N 35°N CARMEN""-"'-'

1974 ...9- 300N 300N ALLEN;../ 1980 .~ ~ ~.. ) &c 25°N I , .. 25°N ELOISE. ~-- . 1976 . .:.~ ... .0 .,' 200N n. 200N 100oW 95°W 900W 85C'W 8COW 75°W 7QOW 65°W 60oW

Figure 8. Landfa1ling United States major humcanes (stronger than or equal to a category 3) during the period 1971.-1980.

25 Figure 9. Landfalling United States major hurricanes (stronger than or equal to a category 3) during the period 1981..1990.

700W 65°W 600W 45°N ~

40DN

35°N ~ 18.. 300N ~~ I BRET 300N

1999

~: ANDREW 25°N 1992 25°N ..I; ...~~',' ..,~ ~~'=-; ~ OPAl!. '9911 , ...'1' .'. , . BREi' .I I -~, ,. ..', I "'- :~: 20oN ,'~;:i.'~~'I...:: ",-.d,-. 20oN

100oW 95°W 90OW 85°1N 80oW 75°W 70oW 65°W 60oW

Figure 10. Landfalling United Statc,smajor hurricanes (stronger than or equal to a category 3) during the period 1991..2000.

26 r Cl.':E"~~1()1()~0 05 ~ ~ ~ co I() co I() iii ~--'-'O'>O'>O'>O'> "0 ~~§§~~~~@~@~~~~~ C ro "Ui ~ c c- "OJ ... ~ ~ ~ ~-a.~~01()00 co ~ ~ ~ N NOM ~ ~ 0) ~ In In :> 0) ~ ., 0) ~ 0) M ~ , In M 0 ~ ~ In co-x~=>=>O'>;:O'>~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ :) aI :5 In "0 .c~~ C inN In~ , ~ "tJ ro 76cc~o~~ a.> Q)=>=> ~N~NN~COO~~""'In~~OOM N::)~~"'::) ~ ~ 8 0 :c E ~ 0 0 (.) 1: aI ... '-a.> ~ C\1 0 0 M ~ 0 c.. -c ~ 0)~1n ~ 0 1n00)00M (.) ~O , NI() ": ~O)O~~~In~~~In~NOO)M Q):=~~NMCO -.." .v. CO -~ ~ ..In .N a.> "ffi -COccNM - V. ~I 0) N .~ -~ ~ ~ .~ 0 .In . In~=>=> -,..:M o~ C ~ M ~ ~~~M~::)~::)::)::)O)o)COM~N ~ ~- I() N , ~ ~ N ~ M. ""'.~ 0).~ ~ :r: < -- ~ ~ ~ ~ LL. "tJ~ ~ C\1 == ro "tJ 'S: P. 0- C\1 o~ 0 0 Q) 0 0 0 § ~- 0 0 0 0 000080 E N --1n~~ § § 8 8 8 ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ 8. ~ 0 0 Q) o~ C coo.8 8° 8 -8. 8-~ '- r--. I c)~=>=>N .N - IJ"i NO::) 0 ::) ::) ::) In 0 8 0 0 COCO co~ ~ ~'~ M ~ N 0 In ~ M In N 0 E C M 0') ~ --In 'M CO => ~ ~ ~ ~ .- "'ffi 0 ~ E In "-e !3 °ffi °ffi 0- 8 U) 8 8 In ~ ~ ~ CO "tJ aI .c~co ~ C C ...COCO~ CO 0'-08 0~0~8 ~._~~ C\1 0 0 O:I: 0- ~ 0- .~ ~ .~ .-g: x .~ 0 .~ 0 .-~ c.. ~ c.. c.. U >- ~.g~~ 'e~~~'t:~c..wo~~ ~ r.J ~'-"1:-1: ~1:>--Q)-- E "'ffi E ~ ~ Q) a: Q) Q) cn ...Q)cn cn Q) c.. Q) cn > a: >cn > ro ~ E E °E ~ ~~::) ~~~ ~::)cn cn r.J 0 "5- c..~c..c.. c.. c..oc.. ::)~::)::) 0 ~88 I() cn ~. '" ~~ N c.. cn cn ~ >. "Ui .~ N N C\1 ~ "tJ I;J) "Ui «) 0, O'>N ~ 0 MI()I()I()«) COCO~~No)COOlno)o)o)InCO~o) r.J 0'>0'>0'>0'>0'> 0)~NNMM~InCO~"""""~o)o)o)o) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) CJ) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) "0 Q)~~~~'- ~.NNN~~NN~O~,:t)O~~~N~ ~MM ~. ~.0 ~.co ~.~ ~.N ~.In In or-.c~ ~.~ ~-~ ~-co ~-0 ~, ~ C ro 76ailriNfliri O~~OON S a.> "Ui C) C) Co) C) > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~> ~~Q)~ 0 ~ ~ Q) Q) Q) Q) ~ Q) Q) ~ Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) 0 "~ < ~ C/) cn cn cn < cn cn .~ cn cn cn cn cn z :5 'E «O. "tJ U) a.> a> ~ C "Qi ~ .5 .- 0 CD -:- aI U 0 U) --cn 'E >- 0 :c == .Q Q) ~ ffi g ~ uS t-= (.) ro (,) 0 0 .9- 8 .~ --t-= -;:;- Q) U) In I- ~ .9- .D iii .-.9- ro U -.~ ~ cn Q) Co U J:::JLL.ZU~ ro ~ Q).~ Q) o.:?:;o~ ~>. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'E ~ .~o '> ~Q) ~'S 1: 0 § ~ ~~._CO-co~CO 0 ~ 05 0 ~ .- ro ro ro ro ro ro ro 0 -ro ~ ~ .w 0 Q) Q) w Z~:I:ZO_..5 cn cn cn cn cn cn cn 0 W I:) LL. J: ~ J: <-' -J SUMMARY

In virtually every coastal city of any size from Texas to Maine, the present Tropical Prediction Center Director, Max Mayfield, or former National Hurricane Center Directors, have stated that the United States is building toward its next hurricaJle disaster. The population growth and low hurricane experience levels indicated in Hebert et al. (1984), together with updated statistics presented b)" Jarrell et al. ( 1992), form the basis for their statements. The areas along the United States Gulf and Atlantic coasts where most of this country's hurri,canerelated fatalities have occurred are also now experiencing the country's most signific~mt growth in population. This situation, in combination with continued building along the coast, will lead to serious problems for many areas in hurricanes. Because it is likely that people will alwa~{sbe attracted to live along the shoreline, a solution to the problem lies in education, preparedness~md mitigation.

The messageto coastal residents is: Become familiar with what hurricanes can do, and when a hurricane threatens your area, increase your chances of survival by moving away from the water until the hurricane has passed! Unless this messageis clearly understood by coastal residents through a thorough and continuing preparednesseffort, disastrous loss of life is inevitable in the future.

Acknowledgments:Paul Hebert,J.G. Ta~'lorand R.A. Case,co-authors of previous versionof this paper,are recognizedfor their enduringc:ontributions to this work. JoanDavid draftedthe figures.

28 REFERENCES

Gentry,R.C., 1966:Nature and ScopeofHwricane Damage,American Societ)' for Oceanograph)' Hwricane Symposium,Publication Number One, 344p.

Hebert, P.J., J.G. Taylor, and R.A. Case, 1984: Hurricane Experience Levels of Coastal Coun~. Populations -Texas to Maine, NOAA, Technical Memorandum NWS-NHC-24, 127pp.

Hebert,P.J., J.D. Jarrell, and B.M. Mayfield, 1997:The Deadliest,Costliest and Most IntenseUnited StatesHurricanes of this Century(and OtherFrequently Requested Hurricane Facts). NOAA. TechnicalMemorandum NWS-TPC-l, 30 pp.

Jarrell, J.D., P.J. Hebert, and B.M. Mayfield, 1992: Hurricane Experience Levels of Coastal Count)' Populations-Texas to Maine, NOAA, Technical Memorandum NWS-NHC-46, 152 pp.

Neumann, C.l., B.R. Jarvinen, C.l. McAdie, and G.R. Hammer, 1999:Tropical Cyclones of the North Atlantic Ocean, 1871-1998, NOAA, Historical ClirnatoQV Series 6-2.

Pielke,Jr., R.A., and C.W. Landsea,1998: Nonnalized U.S. HurricaneDamage. 1925-1995, Weather and Forec~, 13,621-631.

Simpson,R.H., 1974:The HurricaneDisaster Potential Scale. Weatherwise. 27,169,186. u.s. WeatherBureau: Climatological Data and Stonn Data,various volumes, various periods, National and StateSummaries (National WeatherService 1971-1998). u.s. WeatherBureau: Monthlv WeatherReview, 1872-1970(National WeatherService 1971-1973, and AmericanMeteorological Society 1974-2001).

29