Community Leadership for Tiger Conservation (Cltc) Kudremukh

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Community Leadership for Tiger Conservation (Cltc) Kudremukh COMMUNITY LEADERSHIP FOR TIGER CONSERVATION (CLTC) KUDREMUKH FINAL REPORT July 2001 – June 2002 Submitted to SAVE THE TIGER FUND A project of National Fish and Wildlife Foundation in partnership with EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION NIREN JAIN Kudremukh Wildlife Foundation Mangalore, Karnataka, India K. ULLAS KARANTH Wildlife Conservation Society Bangalore, India PRAVEEN BHARGAV Wildlife First Bangalore, India SANJAY GUBBI CENTRE FOR Centre for Wildlife Studies WILDLIFE STUDIES Bangalore, India CONTENTS 1. Executive Summary 3 2. Acknowledgements 4 3. Project Leaders 5 4. Collaborators and other Institutional Partners 5 5. Project Need 6 6. Description of Activities 8 7. Exploratory activities 10 8. Goals/activities for the next year 10 FINAL REPORT TO STF REPORTING PERIOD – 1ST July 2001 to 30th June 2002 PROJECT TITLE: Community Leadership for Tiger Conservation (CLTC) Kudremukh EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The precarious conservation status of the tiger has aroused global concern in recent years. Tigers are under threat from many factors include depletion of prey, direct killing and pressure on their habitat due to fragmentation and degradation of habitat quality. From 1998, the Karnataka Tiger Conservation Project (KTCP), supported by Save the Tiger Fund of the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation and Exxon Mobil Corporation and other Wildlife Conservation Society donors, attempted to address the threats. The long term conservation process evolved under KTCP have seamlessly continued at Kudremukh National Park under the Community Leadership for Tiger Conservation (CLTC) implemented by Niren Jain of the Kudremukh Wildlife Foundation from July 2001in association with Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS), India program. Community Leadership for Tiger Conservation (CLTC) aims to build upon the foundation laid by the earlier implemented Karnataka Tiger Conservation Project (KTCP). CLTC (Kudremukh) aims at the following • Reducing human pressures inside the park • Improving protection system through training and motivating field staff • Campaign against continuation of mining activity in the national park • Mobilise public support and build local conservation leadership for long-term conservation of the park • Explore opportunities for buying and consolidation of enclosures within the park 60 field-monitoring activities have been taken up to reduce human pressures and improve protection system. The project leader has continuously liased with senior forest department officials and the field staff to improve effectiveness of protection mechanism. 142 formal and informal meetings were held with forest department personnel to monitor and improve the effectiveness of protection mechanism. One training camp on effective use of wireless radios was organised under the project. To motivate the field staff 80 sets of field kits and 64 insurance policies were donated to the field protection staff. Five motivational awards were presented to field protection staff for exemplary protection work. The multi-pronged campaign against the continuation of iron ore mining in Kudremukh Reserve was carried on through intensive interactions with decision makers, community leaders and the media. The 12-minute video documentary earlier 2 Community Leadership for Tiger Conservation produced with funding from 21st Century Tiger is being effectively used to educate people about the negative impacts of mining. Several violations of wildlife and forest laws by the mining company were brought to the notice of the forest department resulting in initiation of action against the mining company. A hydrological study on sedimentation of River Bhadra due to mining has been taken up in collaboration with Centre for Wildlife Studies and hydrologist Jagdish Krishnaswamy of Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and Environment. Wildlife Conservation Society, India Program, funds this project. The CLTC project leader in association with government departments has carried out a detailed survey on the number of people living inside the reserve. This will form the basis in preparing the voluntary rehabilitation project proposal to consolidate tiger habitat. The project leader has already liaisoned with villagers inside the reserve about voluntary rehabilitation many of whom are willing to move out. The project leader has also initiated conflict resolution activities to negate the misinformation campaign about the reserve and voluntary rehabilitation. Over 250 families living inside the reserve have been reached through these conflict resolution meetings. Dialogue has been carried out with two prominent rural development organisations who have expressed support for the reserve and the voluntary rehabilitation project. The project leader has explored possibilities to acquire private land enclosures inside the reserve. A total of 400 ha of land has been identified by the project leader for land purchases to consolidate prime tiger habitat within the reserve. A detailed framework has been worked out in consultation with senior government officials. 12 slide talks and other community education programs were taken up under the project to reach out to students, school children and teachers living around the reserve. This will mobilise community support for the reserve. Five field exposure visits to journalists were carried on to sensitise journalists about the reserve. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Community Leadership for Tiger Conservation (Kudremukh) was made possible with the funding support from Save the Tiger Fund of National Fish and Wildlife Foundation created in partnership with Exxon Mobil Corporation. The project team wishes to thank all the donors. The project team also wishes to thank the Chief Wildlife Warden, Reserve Warden, Kudremukh National Park and all other staff of the Karnataka Forest Department for their kind co-operation. 3 Community Leadership for Tiger Conservation PROJECT LEADERS: Project Design and Overall Guidance: K.Ullas Karanth, Conservation Zoologist, Wildlife Conservation Society, New York. Project Co-ordination: Praveen Bhargav, Wildlife First Sanjay Gubbi, Centre for Wildlife Studies Project Leader: Niren Jain, Kudremukh Wildlife Foundation COLLABORATORS AND OTHER INSTITUTIONAL AFFILIATIONS: I. Wildlife Conservation Society – India Program II. Centre for Wildlife Studies, Bangalore. III. Wildlife First, Bangalore IV. Nagarahole Wildlife Conservation Education Project (NAWICOED) V. Nature Conservation Guild, Chikmagalur VI. Wild Cat-C, Chikmagalur VII. Nature Conservation Foundation, Mysore VIII. Arohana, Mangalore IX. Dharmasthala Rural Development Project PROJECT DURATION: Start date : July 01, 2001, End date : June 30, 2002 PROJECT BUDGET: $ 14,500 4 Community Leadership for Tiger Conservation PROJECT NEED: The Kudremukh National Park is the largest declared wildlife Protected Area (600 sq. km) of a tropical wet evergreen type of forest in the Western Ghats. The Western Ghats is one of the twenty-five hot spots identified for bio-diversity conservation in the world (Myers Norman et. al., 1988, Conservation International). The Kudremukh National Park comes under the Global Tiger Conservation Priority I, TCU-55 (Wikramanayake E.D. et. al., 1998), under the format developed jointly by Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) and World Wide Fund-USA. The western & southern sides of the Park form a steep slope with an altitude varying from 100m - 1880m. This has made the forest difficult to access and consequently has not been subjected to intensive human exploitation or clear felling to make space for cultivation in its more remote parts. The main vegetation type in the Park (Pascal J.P., Meher-Homji, 1982) is mainly evergreen or semi-evergreen climax & potentially related forests. The central, northern & eastern portions of the Park comprise a formation of rolling hills with a mosaic of grasslands and sholas. The northern end of the Park borders on the Someshwara Wildlife Sanctuary and the southern end is linked to Pushpagiri Wildlife Sanctuary through a narrow stretch of Reserved Forests. A diverse assemblage of endangered large mammals is found in the Park supporting three large mammal predator species Tiger (Panthera tigris-EN as listed in the IUCN threatened species list, EN- Endangered) Leopard (Panthera pardus) and Wild Dogs (Cuon alpinus-VU, Vulnerable). The important tiger prey base found within the Park are Gaur (Bos gaurus-VU), Sambar (Cervus Unicolor), Wild Pig (Sus scrofa), Muntjac (Muntiacus muntjac), Chevrotain (Tragulus memmina), Bonnet Macaque (Macaca radiata), Common Langur (Presbytis entellus -LR, Lower Risk) and the Lion Tailed Macaque (Macaca silenus - EN). In 1916 the Government declared the area as Reserved Forest, to stop rampant slash and burn cultivation practices. Later, the Government of Karnataka declared these Reserved Forests as a National Park in 1987 based on the presence of the highly endangered Lion Tailed Macaques in these forests (Karanth K.U., 1985). Threats to tigers and its habitat 1. Poisoning Tiger Kills: Livestock depredation by tigers from human settlements within the Park and in the villages surrounding the Park, have driven people to taking preventative measures by eliminating the large predators through poisoning the half eaten kill. Such acts pose a threat to the tiger population over the years. 2. Threat to Tiger's Prey Base: Hunting of large mammals by the local community mainly for meat, has substantially depleted the tiger prey population in the Park. Hunting intensities in Kudremukh National Park have been estimated as 218
Recommended publications
  • Hampi, Badami & Around
    SCRIPT YOUR ADVENTURE in KARNATAKA WILDLIFE • WATERSPORTS • TREKS • ACTIVITIES This guide is researched and written by Supriya Sehgal 2 PLAN YOUR TRIP CONTENTS 3 Contents PLAN YOUR TRIP .................................................................. 4 Adventures in Karnataka ...........................................................6 Need to Know ........................................................................... 10 10 Top Experiences ...................................................................14 7 Days of Action .......................................................................20 BEST TRIPS ......................................................................... 22 Bengaluru, Ramanagara & Nandi Hills ...................................24 Detour: Bheemeshwari & Galibore Nature Camps ...............44 Chikkamagaluru .......................................................................46 Detour: River Tern Lodge .........................................................53 Kodagu (Coorg) .......................................................................54 Hampi, Badami & Around........................................................68 Coastal Karnataka .................................................................. 78 Detour: Agumbe .......................................................................86 Dandeli & Jog Falls ...................................................................90 Detour: Castle Rock .................................................................94 Bandipur & Nagarhole ...........................................................100
    [Show full text]
  • Bhadra Voluntary Relocation India
    BHADRA VOLUNTARY RELOCATION INDIA INDIA FOREWORD During my tenure as Director Project Tiger in the Ministry of Environment and Forests, Govt. of India, I had the privilege of participating in voluntary relocation of villages from Bhadra Tiger Reserve. As nearly two decades have passed, whatever is written below is from my memory only. Mr Yatish Kumar was the Field Director of Bhadra Tiger Reserve and Mr Gopalakrishne Gowda was the Collector of Chikmagalur District of Karnataka during voluntary relocation in Bhadra Tiger Reserve. This Sanctuary was notified as a Tiger Reserve in the year 1998. After the notification as tiger reserve, it was necessary to relocate the existing villages as the entire population with their cattle were dependent on the Tiger Reserve. The area which I saw in the year 1998 was very rich in flora and fauna. Excellent bamboo forests were available but it had fire hazard too because of the presence of villagers and their cattle. Tiger population was estimated by Dr. Ullas Karanth and his love for this area was due to highly rich biodiversity. Ultimately, resulted in relocation of all the villages from within the reserve. Dr Karanth, a devoted biologist was a close friend of mine and during his visit to Delhi he proposed relocation of villages. As the Director of Project Tiger, I was looking at voluntary relocation of villages for tribals only from inside Tiger Reserve by de-notifying suitable areas of forests for relocation, but in this case the villagers were to be relocated by purchasing a revenue land which was very expensive.
    [Show full text]
  • Bi-Monthly Outreach Journal of National Tiger Conservation Authority Government of India
    BI-MONTHLY OUTREACH JOURNAL OF NATIONAL TIGER CONSERVATION AUTHORITY GOVERNMENT OF INDIA Volume 3 Issue 2 Jan-Feb 2012 TIGER MORTALITY 2011 AS REPORTED BY STATES Natural & other cause Accident Seizure Inside tiger reserve Outside tiger Eliminated by dept Poaching No. of tiger deaths reserve UTTARAKHAND 14 1 1 1 — 17 8 9 KERALA 3 — — 1 — 4 2 2 ASSAM 3 — — 2 1 6 4 2 MADHYA PRADESH 5 — — — — 5 4 1 RAJASTHAN 1 — — — — 1 1 — ORISSA 1 — — — — 1 1 — TAMIL NADU 3 — — — — 3 1 2 WEST BENGAL 3 — — — — 3 2 1 KARNATAKA 3 — — 3 — 6 6 — MAHARASHTRA 2 — 1 2 1 6 1 5 UTTAR PRADESH — — 1 — — 1 1 — CHHATTISGARH — — — 2 — 2 — 2 BIHAR 1 — — — — 1 — 1 TOTAL 39 1 3 11 2 56 31 25 * One old tiger trophy was seized in Delhi Volume 3 Evaluation Protocol EDITOR Issue 2 Status of Dr Rajesh Gopal Jan-Feb Monitoring tigers in Phase-IV 2012 Western EDITORIAL in tiger Ghats COORDINATOR reserves & Landscape S P YADAV source areas Pg 4 Pg 15 CONTENT COORDINATOR Inder MS Kathuria Photo Tiger FEEDBACK Feature Soldiers Assessment Annexe No 5 Camera Protection Management Bikaner House traps at force gets Effectiveness Shahjahan Road New Delhi work in going in Evaluation Kalakad TR Bandipur, P8 [email protected] Pg 14 Nagarhole Cover photo Pg 18 Bharat Goel BI-MONTHLY OUTREACH JOURNAL OF NATIONAL TIGER CONSERVATION AUTHORITY GOVERNMENT OF INDIA n o t e f r o m t h e e d i t o r THE new year, with all its freshness, tigers and its prey in each tiger reserves which would commenced with a new set of initiatives complement the once in four year snapshot assess- from NTCA.
    [Show full text]
  • Graduate Student Summer Fieldwork Award Report, October 2019
    Institute for Regional and International Studies (IRIS) Graduate Student Summer Fieldwork Award Report, October 2019 Quantifying forest loss in the Nethravathi watershed, India Deepika Guruprasad, Environmental Observation and Informatics Master’s Program Nelson Institute, UW Madison. The Western Ghats is a mountain range which runs parallel to the western coast of India. It is a global biodiversity hotspot which is home to several endangered and endemic mammals, birds and plant species. Many life-sustaining rivers originate here and provide several irreplaceable ecosystem services. The Nethravathi river is one of the major west flowing rivers whose tributaries originate in these mountains. Its watershed has some of the last untouched tropical forests which are key to maintaining connectivity between two protected areas, Kudremukh National Park in the North and Pushpagiri Wildlife sanctuary in the South. In the last 20 years, this region has seen a rapid loss of forests due to ill-planned linear infrastructure projects such as pipelines, roads, hydroelectric, and river diversion dams. These projects have and continue to fragment the landscape as new projects are proposed and implemented with little or no impact assessment. Land use change alters a homogenous landscape into heterogeneous patches, which leads to habitat fragmentation. My summer leadership placement was with the wildlife advocacy non-profit, Wildlife First. The objective of this placement was to map and quantify forest loss due to linear infrastructure projects in the Nethravathi river watershed. Filling in data gaps using reliable land use maps and forest loss statistics is key to make evidence-based policy recommendations. The first part of my project was to map land use of the region using satellite imagery.
    [Show full text]
  • Correlates of Hornbill Distribution and Abundance in Rainforest Fragments in the Southern Western Ghats, India
    Bird Conservation International (2003) 13:199–212. BirdLife International 2003 DOI: 10.1017/S0959270903003162 Printed in the United Kingdom Correlates of hornbill distribution and abundance in rainforest fragments in the southern Western Ghats, India T. R. SHANKAR RAMAN and DIVYA MUDAPPA Summary The distribution and abundance patterns of Malabar Grey Hornbill Ocyceros griseus and Great Hornbill Buceros bicornis were studied in one undisturbed and one heavily altered rainforest landscape in the southern Western Ghats, India. The Agasthyamalai hills (Kalakad-Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve, KMTR) contained over 400 km2 of continuous rainforest, whereas the Anamalai hills (now Indira Gandhi Wildlife Sanctuary, IGWS) contained fragments of rainforest in a matrix of tea and coffee plantations. A comparison of point-count and line transect census techniques for Malabar Grey Hornbill at one site indicated much higher density estimates in point-counts (118.4/km2) than in line transects (51.5/km2), probably due to cumulative count over time in the former technique. Although line transects appeared more suitable for long-term monitoring of hornbill populations, point-counts may be useful for large-scale surveys, especially where forests are fragmented and terrain is unsuitable for line transects. A standard fixed radius point-count method was used to sample different altitude zones (600–1,500 m) in the undisturbed site (342 point-counts) and fragments ranging in size from 0.5 to 2,500 ha in the Anamalais (389 point-counts). In the fragmented landscape, Malabar Grey Hornbill was found in higher altitudes than in KMTR, extending to nearly all the disturbed fragments at mid-elevations (1,000–1,200 m).
    [Show full text]
  • Landslide Near Eravikulam National Park
    Landslide near Eravikulam National Park drishtiias.com/printpdf/landslide-near-eravikulam-national-park Why in News Recently, landslides have been reported at the Nayamakkad tea estate at Pettimudy which is located about 30 km from Munnar, adjacent to the Eravikulam National Park (ENP), Kerala. Key Points Features of ENP: It is located in the High Ranges (Kannan Devan Hills) of the Southern Western Ghats in the Devikulam Taluk of Idukki District, Kerala. It spreads over an area of 97 square km and hosts South India's highest peak, Anamudi (2695 m), in its southern area. The Rajamalai region of the park stays open to the public for tourism. History: The Government of Kerala acquired the area from the Kannan Devan Hills Produce Company under the Kannan Devan Hill Produce (Resumption of lands) Act 1971. It was declared as Eravikulam-Rajamala Wildlife Sanctuary in 1975 and was elevated to the status of a National Park in 1978. Topography: The main body of the park comprises a high rolling plateau (plateau at different elevation or with varying heights) with a base elevation of about 2000 m from mean sea level. Three major types of plant communities found in the park are: Grasslands, Shrub Land and Shola Forests (mosaic of montane evergreen forests and grasslands). The park represents the largest and least disturbed stretch of unique Montane Shola-Grassland vegetation in the Western Ghats. 1/4 Flora: It houses the special Neelakurinji flowers (Strobilanthes kunthianam) that bloom once every 12 years and the next sighting is expected to be in 2030. Apart from that, it has rare terrestrial and epiphytic orchids, wild balsams, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Divergent Views on the Project Emerge at Meet
    Divergent views on the project emerge at meet http://www.deccanherald.com/content/97146/divergent-views-project-em... Login | Register News updated at 9:32 AM IST RSS Weather SEARCH Max: 27°C In Bangalore Min : 21°C Rain lightly Wednesday 6 October 2010 Home News Business Supplements Sports Entertainment Opinion Columns Analysis Feedback Archives Jobs Stuck in Afghanistan powerful Pentagon leans before Pak Army BBMP warns penalty on filthy vacant sites Fresh revolt brews in Chennai against BSY You are here: Home » State » Divergent views on the project emerge at meet Related News Rs 43,000-cr power generation plan in the pipeline Divergent views on the project emerge at meet Inquiry ordered into coal buy CM praises KPCL for highest turnover Hongadahalla, Hassan district, Sept 16, DH News Service: KPCL defends power plants at Yedlapur, Yeramaras 'If Hassan can generate 200 MW of power using windmills, why cannot the Videos Karnataka Power Corporation Limited (KPCL) look for alternative steps to produce 400 MW of power, instead of destroying the precious Western Ghat region,' questioned Mohan, the honorary wildlife warden of Hassan district. Deposing his views before the Western Ghats Ecology Expert Panel Chairman Prof Madhav Gadgil and other members, at a public meet organised by Malenadu Janapara Horata Samithi at Hongadahalla on Thursday, he requested the KPCL not to take the project as a prestige issue. He also requested the panel to take steps to stop mini hydel projects, as nearly 40 mini hydel projects are coming up in the Western Ghats region alone. Samiti President H A Kishore Kumar, in his submission to the panel, stated that the project is against the Supreme Court guidelines which states that no mega project Aussies impressed with games preps and term it should come up in 10 km vicinity of wildlife sanctuary.
    [Show full text]
  • F.No.Lo-6/2016-IA.III Sm: 'Improvement of Shanivarasanthe
    F.No.lO-6/2016-IA.III Government of India Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate Change (IA.III Section) Indira Paryavaran Bhawan, Jor Bagh Road, New Delhi - 3 Dated: 29th February, 2016 To The Project Director, Kamataka State Highways Improvement Project, Project Implementation Unit, 1st Floor, PWD Offices Annexe Building, K R Circle, Bangalore - 1 (Karnataka) Sm: 'Improvement of Shanivarasanthe - Madikeri Section of SH-27 and Somwarpet to Kodagu District Border Section of SH-85' in the State of Karnataka by Karnataka State Highways Improvement Project Implementation Unit - Terms of Reference - reg. Si, This has reference to your application NO.PIU jKSHIP-IIIjMOEF-ECj Sringeri­ H.andij2015-16j6861 dated 30.12.2015 submitted the above mentioned proposal tc this Ministry for seeking Terms of Reference (ToR) in terms of the provisions of th Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification, 2006 under the Elvironment (Protection) Act, 1986. 2 The proposal for 'Improvement of Shanivarasanthe - Madikeri Section of 81-27 and Somwarpet to Kodagu District Border Section of SH-85' in the Sate of Karnataka by Karnataka State Highways Improvement Project Inplementation Unit, was considered by the Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) in fe Ministry for Infrastructure Development, Coastal Regulation Zone, Buildingj CJnstruction and Miscellaneous projects, in its 156th meeting held on 28-29 dnuary, 2016. ~, The details of the project, as per the documents submitted by the Project lroponents (PP), and also as informed during the above said EAC meeting, are eported to be as under:­ I) The proposal involves improvement of Shanivarasanthe - Madikeri Section of :H-27 and Somwarpet to Kodagu District Border Section of SH-85 in the State of :arnataka by Karnataka State Highways Improvement Project Implementation Unit.
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Ecology of the Nilgiri Tahr in the Mukurthi National Park, South India
    Status and Ecology of the Nilgiri Tahr in the Mukurthi National Park, South India by Stephen Sumithran Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Fisheries and Wildlife Sciences APPROVED James D. Fraser, Chairman Robert H. Giles, Jr. Patrick F. Scanlon Dean F. Stauffer Randolph H. Wynne Brian R. Murphy, Department Head July 1997 Blacksburg, Virginia Status and Ecology of the Nilgiri Tahr in the Mukurthi National Park, South India by Stephen Sumithran James D. Fraser, Chairman Fisheries and Wildlife Sciences (ABSTRACT) The Nilgiri tahr (Hemitragus hylocrius) is an endangered mountain ungulate endemic to the Western Ghats in South India. I studied the status and ecology of the Nilgiri tahr in the Mukurthi National Park, from January 1993 to December 1995. To determine the status of this tahr population, I conducted foot surveys, total counts, and a three-day census and estimated that this population contained about 150 tahr. Tahr were more numerous in the north sector than the south sector of the park. Age-specific mortality rates in this population were higher than in other tahr populations. I conducted deterministic computer simulations to determine the persistence of this population. I estimated that under current conditions, this population will persist for 22 years. When the adult mortality was reduced from 0.40 to 0.17, the modeled population persisted for more than 200 years. Tahr used grasslands that were close to cliffs (p <0.0001), far from roads (p <0.0001), far from shola forests (p <0.01), and far from commercial forestry plantations (p <0.001).
    [Show full text]
  • Plants from Nilgiri, Kanuvai and Madukkarai Forests of Southern Western Ghats, India
    JoTT NOTE 4(15): 3436–3442 collapse, about 1500 species have a Western Ghats Special Series highly fragmented population and at least 50 endemic species have Validation and documentation of rare not be relocated after repeated endemic and threatened (RET) plants surveys (Nayar 1998). from Nilgiri, Kanuvai and Madukkarai The current paper is an attempt to study the forests of southern Western Ghats, conservation assessment of rare, endemic and India threatened species (RET) of the southern Western Ghats. As part of the Nilgiri Landscape Restoration K.M. Prabhu Kumar 1, V. Sreeraj 2, Binu Thomas 3, Programme conducted by the British Council K.M. Manudev 4 & A. Rajendran 5 International Climate Champions in association with the Tamil Nadu Forest Department, (Nilgiris North & 1,2,3,5 Department of Botany, Bharathiar University, Tamil Nadu 641046, India South Divisions), British Council India, Earth Trust 4 Department of Botany, St. Joseph’s College Devagiri, Kozhikode, Nilgiris, Edhkwelynawd Botanical Refuge, Nilgiris; Kerala 673008, India Email: 1 [email protected], 2 [email protected], the first author visited and validated the RET plants of 3 [email protected] (corresponding author), 4 [email protected], 5 [email protected], Kolikorai, Melcoupe, Ammagal, Mukurthy National Park (MNP) and Doddabetta forests of the Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve. After that a detailed field survey According to Nayar (1996) there are 60 endemic was carried out by the authors in Kolikorai, Melcoupe, genera and 2,015 species of flowering plants endemic Kil Kothagiri, Longwood Shola and Kothagiri forests to peninsular India. The Western Ghats possess a high of Nilgiris with the help of Earth Trust Nilgiris, and percentage of endemic species, about 48% of 4000 many plants were identified and documented.
    [Show full text]
  • A Record of Brown Mongoose Herpestes Fuscus in Pampadum Shola National Park, Southern Western Ghats, India
    SHORT COMMUNICATION A record of Brown Mongoose Herpestes fuscus in Pampadum Shola National Park, southern Western Ghats, India S. NIKHIL 1 http://www.smallcarnivoreconservation.org ISSN 1019-5041 1. Munnar Wildlife Division, Kerala Forest Departmant, Abstract. Munnar, Kerala, India An individual of Brown Mongoose Herpestes fuscus was recorded using camera trapping technique in Pampadum Shola National Park, near Bison swamp area. There Correspondence: are a few records of Brown Mongoose from the state so far and hence is considered as S. Nikhil a rare species. [email protected] Keywords: Camera trapping, high-altitude, shola- grassland ecosystem, small carnivore. Associate editor: Divya Mudappa Brown Mongoose is a comparatively large forest mongoose, which is characterised with yellowish-brown coloured fur, black feet and short bushy tail which tapers to a conical point (Menon 2014). Details regarding the behaviour of this species are still unknown and the species is currently classified as Least Concern by the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (Mudappa & Jathanna 2015). Pampadum Shola is one of the three Shola National Parks in Kerala and is a part of Munnar Wildlife Division. It is a montane grassland shola habitat and is a rich abode of biodiversity. There are a few records of this species prior to the present one from this part of the world. Mudappa et al. (2008) recorded this from Peeramedu, Idukki district. It was also recorded from Parambikulam Tiger Reserve and Eravikulam National Park by Sreehari et al. (2013). The record from Eravikulam National Park was at an elevation of 2,032 m asl and the one from Parambikulam Tiger Reserve was at 492 m asl which explained the altitudinal range of the species.
    [Show full text]
  • Chennai-Kanyakumari Industrial Corridor Power Sector Investment
    Initial Environmental Examination (Draft) Project Number: 51308-001 May 2019 India: Chennai-Kanyakumari Industrial Corridor: Power Sector Investment Project Prepared by Tamil Nadu Transmission Company (TANTRANSCO), Government of Tamil Nadu (Department of Energy) for the Asian Development Bank. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 27 May 2019) Currency unit – Indian rupee (₹) ₹1.00 = $.01441 $1.00 = ₹69.37450 ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank ACSR – aluminium conductor steel reinforced AMSL – average mean sea level CEA – Central Electricity Authority CPCB – Central Pollution Control Board, Government of India DPR – detailed project report EIA – environmental impact assessment EMoP – environmental monitoring plan EMP – environmental management plan EHV – extra high voltage EPC – engineering, procurement and commissioning GCC General Construction Circle of TANTRANSCO GHG – green house gases GoTN – Government of Tamil Nadu GoI – Government of India GRM – grievance redressal mechanism CKIC – Chennai-Kanyakumari Industrial Corridor TNPCB – Tamil Nadu State Pollution Control Board TANTRANSCO – Tamil Nadu Power Transmission Corporation Limited TNEB – Tamil Nadu Electricity Board IEE – initial environmental examination IFC International Finance Corporation/World Bank LILO – line-in-line-out MFF – multi-tranche financing facility MOEFCC – Ministry of Environment, Forests & Climate Change, Government of India PCB – poly chlorinated biphenyl PGCIL – Power Grid Corporation of India Limited RoW – right of way WEIGHTS AND MEASURES ha (hectare) – 10,000 sq m km (kilometer) – 1,000 m kV – kilovolt (1,000 volts) kW – kilowatt (1,000 watts) kWh – kilowatt-hour MVA – Megavolt-Amperes MW – Mega Watt This initial environmental examination is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature.
    [Show full text]