Susan Rojas Malory's Gawain: Characterizing Fragmentation And

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Susan Rojas Malory's Gawain: Characterizing Fragmentation And Susan Rojas Malory’s Gawain: Characterizing Fragmentation and Unification Aquila – The FGCU Student Research Journal Volume 2 Issue 1 (2016) DOI 10.24049/aq.2.1.5 © 2016 Rojas Distributed under Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 OPEN ACCESS Aquila - The FGCU Student Research Journal 0DORU\¶V*DZDLQ&KDUDFWHUL]LQJ)UDJPHQWDWLRQDQG8QL¿FDWLRQ Susan Rojas: English In Geoffrey of Monmouth’s The History of the Kings that “Britains were better at boasting and making threats” of Britain, Gawain1 is portrayed as a respected warrior WKDQ ¿JKWLQJ DQG FXWV RII KLV KHDG LJQLWLQJ WKH FODVK and brave and valiant knight. His leadership in battle is between the Romans and Britains (241). This incident without question, and his troops are successful under his is also found in the Alliterative Morte (1263-76, 1352- command. The Quest of the Holy Grail, however, paints a 1354), and in both texts, after the beheading Gawain leads very different picture. This Gawain is much less noble, a his men skillfully, holding their own until reinforcements “bad and faithless” knight (77) so concerned with earthly arrive (Alliterative 1368-1405, Geoffrey 242). adventure and glory he cannot realize this spiritual lack In both The History and the Alliterative Morte, Gawain’s will cause him to fail in his quest. In what might be abilities as knight and leader are common knowledge described as a blend of the two, Sir Thomas Malory’s among his opponents, who savor the opportunity to Le Morte Darthur limns a very different Gawain, taking engage with him. Geoffrey does not stint in his praise of threads from The Quest, the Alliterative Morte Arthure, Gawain, stating “No better knights than Hoel and Gawain and the French The Death of King Arthur and intertwining have ever been born down the ages” (254), and calling them. When this Gawain dies, he has arguably become him “fearless” and “the bravest of all the knights,” as he a more honorable, noble, and introspective character “decimated the enemy” (254). These superlatives not only than the one found in either Geoffrey or The Quest. A GH¿QH*DZDLQ¶VDELOLWLHVEXWDOVRSODFHKLPDVDNQLJKW comparison of these sources with Le Morte Darthur of the highest order.2 Additionally, Geoffrey takes care to suggests that Malory employs aspects of several versions recount how easily Gawain orders his troops, as well as RIWKH*DZDLQFKDUDFWHUDYDLODEOHLQWKH¿IWHHQWKFHQWXU\ KRZVXFFHVVIXOO\WKH\¿JKWXQGHUKLVFRPPDQGREVHUYLQJ to skillfully renew and resituate the knight. Although re- “[Gawain’s troops] agreed to what he proposed. They all establishing Gawain as honorable and noble at the end of turned back and each of them killed his man” (242). He 0DORU\¶V ERRN UHÀHFWV D KRSH IRU UHVROXWLRQ RI FRQÀLFW notes that Lucius, commander of the Roman troops, is and forgiveness in the face of the disintegration of the ³NHHQ´WR¿JKWKDQGWRKDQGZLWK*DZDLQDQG³UHMRLFHG Round Table, the process also shows loyalty and valor that his opponent was so famous a man” (254). Although as attributes able to cut both ways: they may heal, but in Geoffrey’s history Lucius “fell dead, pierced through they may also harm, revealing through the fellowship by an unknown hand” (256), his pleasure in battling with of the knights the essence of Malory’s Arthurian world. Gawain makes clear that Gawain’s status as warrior knight ZDVVROLGDQGKLVUHSXWDWLRQIRU¿JKWLQJZHOONQRZQE\KLV GAWAIN IN GEOFFREY AND THE foes. This fame is echoed in the Alliterative Morte, where $//,7(5$7,9(0257(±9$/,$17.1,*+7 the knight is deemed “Sir Gawain the Good” (1368) and $1'67521*())(&7,9(/($'(5 “Sir Gawain the Gracious” (1468); it also chronicles the Critics disagree about evaluating Gawain in a positive ease with which Gawain dispatches the enemy and how or negative light, but clearly, labelling him as either/ ZHOOKHFRQGXFWVKLPVHOIRQWKH¿HOG RUGRHVQRWUHÀHFWDOODVSHFWVRIKLVFKDUDFWHU³9LOODQ\´ 1368-75). The poet recounts Lucius taunting Gawain to and “troublemaker” are words sometimes associated with ¿JKWKLP³:KDWZLOOWKRX:DZDLQ":RUNIRUWK\ZHSHQ"´ Gawain, yet so are descriptions such as “complex” and (2223); it does not appear they exchange blows, as Lionel “a valiant knight of great achievement, who can be both dispatches the commander (2226-29), but the fact that magnanimous and diplomatic” (McCarthy 12-13). To /XFLXV ZRXOG EH ³NHHQ´ DQG GHVLURXV RI ¿JKWLQJ ZLWK understand Malory’s Gawain, it is necessary to look at his Gawain is another indication of his respect and renown. direct source, the Alliterative Morte Arthure, as well as To battle a knight with no fame would bring no accolades, the book from which the Alliterative ultimately derives its but engaging one known for bravery and military prowess positive account of the knight, Geoffrey of Monmouth’s brings the possibility of greater glory and knightly status. The History of the Kings of Britain. Geoffrey’s Gawain is THE GAWAIN OF “THE QUEST” AND THE brave, commanding, and heroic; Thomas Hahn speaks of FRENCH DEATH OF ARTHUR - LOYAL, BUT his importance, noting the knight’s “stirring exploits” and “UNLUCKY” “preeminent role” (“Chivalric” 218-219). In The History, Gawain is one of Arthur’s high-ranking emissaries sending The Quest of the Holy Grail differs from Geoffrey and an ultimatum to Lucius Hiberius and his Roman troops: the Alliterative Morte in that the author implies Gawain OHDYH *DXO RU ¿JKW IRU SRVVHVVLRQ RI WKH ODQG *DZDLQ is not a knight to be emulated, despite his loyalty to however, takes offense when Lucius’s nephew mutters the king and desire for chivalric adventure3. Gawain’s 1 Throughout, I will use the spelling “Gawain” as it is found in 2 The “scale of merit” in Geoffroi de Charny’s Book of Chivalry the cited editions of Geoffrey, The Quest, and the French Death. .DHXSHU GHVFULEHVVXFFHVVDQGYDORULQDFWXDOFRQÀLFWDVWKHDSH[ The spelling of the knight’s name is highly inconsistent in both the of knightly attainment. Geoffrey’s and the Alliterative poet’s accounts Alliterative Morte and Malory, so for the ease of both author and of Gawain in battle show he earns this level of recognition. reader, I have selected a commonly used form. 3 In endnotes to his translation of The Quest, P.M.Matarasso also 33 Rojas DOI 10.24049/aq.2.1.5 military prowess and leadership are not described, but when Gawain and Hector encounter a hermit who tells his allegiance to Arthur is displayed early on through his them they are “most heinous sinners” and since they are obeying the command to attempt to draw the sword in in “mortal sin” should leave the quest (174). Gawain in the stone. Although Gawain originally will not make an particular is told he is an “old tree” who has done “little attempt, after Arthur says “You shall try all the same… enough for [his] Maker” since he was knighted (175). His not to win the sword, but because I ask it” (Quest 35), response, that he would “gladly” talk with the hermit, the knight immediately does, and fails. Lancelot tells but has to catch up with his companion (175), once more him he will regret the action, but Gawain replies he was shows his lack of concern for the condition of his soul and only following Arthur’s command, regardless of the spiritual life; his priorities are catching up with Hector and outcome (36), displaying the attributes of a good knight seeking adventure. The exchange not only foregrounds who obeys his king’s wishes despite the threat of personal Gawain “as the outstanding instance of relentless harm.4 It is perhaps this loyalty to Arthur and his court, devotion to physical exertion and knightly honor,” but as well as his desire for “adventure…the raison d’être of also “pays tribute to his unique stature and broad celebrity the kingdom at peace” (McCarthy 11), which prompts as the knight of adventure” (Hahn, “Chivalric” 220). *DZDLQWREHWKH¿UVWWRYROXQWHHUIRUWKH4XHVW 4XHVW Clearly, Gawain’s status and “celebrity” are not good 44). He certainly recognizes this adventure as primarily enough for the author of The Quest. Its Gawain episodes an opportunity for gaining personal glory and honor, surround the knight with settings and situations that yet participating will also bring prestige to the name of underscore his poor spiritual condition, as well as the Arthur and the Round Table (Hahn, “Romances” 2). idea that he is unworthy of and unable to understand the Arthur, however, sees the situation in a different light, sacred. In an “ancient chapel, set on an upland in between lamenting and accusing Gawain of “a mortal blow, for two crags, and seemingly abandoned and deserted” (163), you have deprived me of the best and truest companions Gawain and Hector unarm, kneel before the altar, and DPDQFRXOG¿QG´ 4XHVW *DZDLQZRXOGWKHQKDYH pray “as good Christians should,” then sit and “chat…of reneged on his promise, but “the occasion had been too this and that” (164). Their actions imply the poverty of public to permit it” (45), the implication being that his their faith, as it is clear that they go through the motions pride would not let him -- although Arthur’s unexpected RQO\ UDWKHU WKDQ WDNLQJ SUD\HUV WR KHDUW ZLWK UHÀHFWLRQ retort may also have caused him some guilt and shame. and meditation, they pray “as [they] should,” then fall Gawain’s decision not to go back on his vow helps into idle conversation. Gawain and Hector also choose to reveal the complexity of the character: a man of his shelter with a forester, rather than with a hermit (175), word, but somewhat “proud and frivolous” (Lacy & Ashe one of the only times in the text that questing knights do 136), foreshadowing both his failure in the Quest and not lodge in a castle, hermitage, or chapel. Per the OED, (by extension) his failure to be a solid and noble knight.
Recommended publications
  • Queen Guinevere
    Ingvarsdóttir 1 Hugvísindasvið Queen Guinevere: A queen through time B.A. Thesis Marie Helga Ingvarsdóttir June 2011 Ingvarsdóttir 2 Háskóli Íslands Hugvísindasvið Enskudeild Queen Guinevere: A queen through time B.A. Thesis Marie Helga Ingvarsdóttir Kt.: 060389-3309 Supervisor: Ingibjörg Ágústsdóttir June 2011 Ingvarsdóttir 3 Abstract This essay is an attempt to recollect and analyze the character of Queen Guinevere in Arthurian literature and movies through time. The sources involved here are Welsh and other Celtic tradition, Latin texts, French romances and other works from the twelfth and thirteenth centuries, Malory’s and Tennyson’s representation of the Queen, and finally Guinevere in the twentieth century in Bradley’s and Miles’s novels as well as in movies. The main sources in the first three chapters are of European origins; however, there is a focus on French and British works. There is a lack of study of German sources, which could bring different insights into the character of Guinevere. The purpose of this essay is to analyze the evolution of Queen Guinevere and to point out that through the works of Malory and Tennyson, she has been misrepresented and there is more to her than her adulterous relation with Lancelot. This essay is exclusively focused on Queen Guinevere and her analysis involves other characters like Arthur, Lancelot, Merlin, Enide, and more. First the Queen is only represented as Arthur’s unfaithful wife, and her abduction is narrated. We have here the basis of her character. Chrétien de Troyes develops this basic character into a woman of important values about love and chivalry.
    [Show full text]
  • How Geoffrey of Monmouth Influenced the Story of King Arthur
    Western Oregon University Digital Commons@WOU Student Theses, Papers and Projects (History) Department of History 6-10-2019 The Creation of a King: How Geoffrey of Monmouth Influenced the Story of King Arthur Marcos Morales II [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wou.edu/his Part of the Cultural History Commons, Medieval History Commons, and the Medieval Studies Commons Recommended Citation Morales II, Marcos, "The Creation of a King: How Geoffrey of Monmouth Influenced the Story of King Arthur" (2019). Student Theses, Papers and Projects (History). 276. https://digitalcommons.wou.edu/his/276 This Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of History at Digital Commons@WOU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Theses, Papers and Projects (History) by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@WOU. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. The Creation of a King: How Geoffrey of Monmouth Influenced the Story of King Arthur. By: Marcos Morales II Senior Seminar: HST 499 Professor David Doellinger Western Oregon University June 05, 2019 Readers Professor Elizabeth Swedo Professor Bau Hwa Hsieh Copyright © Marcos Morales II Arthur, with a single division in which he had posted six thousand, six hundred, and sixty-six men, charged at the squadron where he knew Mordred was. They hacked a way through with their swords and Arthur continued to advance, inflicting terrible slaughter as he went. It was at this point that the accursed traitor was killed and many thousands of his men with him.1 With the inclusion of this feat between King Arthur and his enemies, Geoffrey of Monmouth shows Arthur as a mighty warrior, one who stops at nothing to defeat his foes.
    [Show full text]
  • Having Ado with Lancelot
    Having Ado with Lancelot: A Chivalric Reassessment of Malory's Champion by Jesse Michael Brillinger Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts (English) Acadia University Fall Convocation 2010 © Jesse Michael Brillinger 2010 This thesis by Jesse M. Brillinger was defended successfully in an oral examination on ___________. The examining committee for the thesis was: ________________________ Dr. Barb Anderson, Chair ________________________ Dr. Kathleen Cawsey, External Reader ________________________ Dr. Patricia Rigg, Internal Reader ________________________ Dr. K. S. Whetter, Supervisor _________________________ Dr. Herb Wyile, Acting Head This thesis is accepted in its present form by the Division of Research and Graduate Studies as satisfying the thesis requirements for the degree of Master of Arts (English). …………………………………………. ii I, Jesse M. Brillinger, grant permission to the University Librarian at Acadia University to reproduce, loan or distribute copies of my thesis in microform, paper or electronic formats on a non‐profit basis. I, however, retain the copyright in my thesis. ______________________________ Jesse M. Brillinger ______________________________ K.S. Whetter, Supervisor ______________________________ Sep. 19, 2010 iii Table of Contents Introduction: Malory, Chivalry and Lancelot ............................................................................... 1 Chapter 1: Medieval Chivalry in Literature and Life ............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • King Arthur: Legend of the Sword (Movie Review)
    Digital Collections @ Dordt Faculty Work Comprehensive List 5-31-2017 King Arthur: Legend of the Sword (Movie Review) Donald Roth [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcollections.dordt.edu/faculty_work Part of the American Film Studies Commons Recommended Citation Roth, D. (2017). King Arthur: Legend of the Sword (Movie Review). Retrieved from https://digitalcollections.dordt.edu/faculty_work/725 This Blog Post is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Collections @ Dordt. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Work Comprehensive List by an authorized administrator of Digital Collections @ Dordt. For more information, please contact [email protected]. King Arthur: Legend of the Sword (Movie Review) Abstract "First, I really liked this movie, and, second, I think it says something really interesting about the nature of evil." Posting about the movie King Arthur: Legend of the Sword from In All Things - an online journal for critical reflection on faith, culture, art, and every ordinary-yet-graced square inch of God’s creation. http://inallthings.org/king-arthur-legend-of-the-sword/ Keywords In All Things, movie review, King Arthur, Legend of the Sword Disciplines American Film Studies Comments In All Things is a publication of the Andreas Center for Reformed Scholarship and Service at Dordt College. This blog post is available at Digital Collections @ Dordt: https://digitalcollections.dordt.edu/faculty_work/725 King Arthur: Legend of the Sword inallthings.org/king-arthur-legend-of-the-sword/ May 31, 2017 Donald Roth With the movie looking to be one of the biggest financial flops in recent cinema history, and with iAt’s resident snarky film critic, Josh Matthews, out of town, you might wonder why I would be volunteering to write a review of this movie (aside from a borderline-pathological need to write that makes this my 50th piece for iAt).
    [Show full text]
  • Actions Héroïques
    Shadows over Camelot FAQ 1.0 Oct 12, 2005 The following FAQ lists some of the most frequently asked questions surrounding the Shadows over Camelot boardgame. This list will be revised and expanded by the Authors as required. Many of the points below are simply a repetition of some easily overlooked rules, while a few others offer clarifications or provide a definitive interpretation of rules. For your convenience, they have been regrouped and classified by general subject. I. The Heroic Actions A Knight may only do multiple actions during his turn if each of these actions is of a DIFFERENT nature. For memory, the 5 possible action types are: A. Moving to a new place B. Performing a Quest-specific action C. Playing a Special White card D. Healing yourself E. Accusing another Knight of being the Traitor. Example: It is Sir Tristan's turn, and he is on the Black Knight Quest. He plays the last Fight card required to end the Quest (action of type B). He thus automatically returns to Camelot at no cost. This move does not count as an action, since it was automatically triggered by the completion of the Quest. Once in Camelot, Tristan will neither be able to draw White cards nor fight the Siege Engines, if he chooses to perform a second Heroic Action. This is because this would be a second Quest-specific (Action of type B) action! On the other hand, he could immediately move to another new Quest (because he hasn't chosen a Move action (Action of type A.) yet.
    [Show full text]
  • Prisons and Punishments in Late Medieval London
    Prisons and Punishments in Late Medieval London Christine Winter Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University of London Royal Holloway, University of London, 2012 2 Declaration I, Christine Winter, hereby declare that this thesis and the work presented in it is entirely my own. Where I have consulted the work of others, this is always clearly stated. Signed: Date: 3 Abstract In the history of crime and punishment the prisons of medieval London have generally been overlooked. This may have been because none of the prison records have survived for this period, yet there is enough information in civic and royal documents, and through archaeological evidence, to allow a reassessment of London’s prisons in the later middle ages. This thesis begins with an analysis of the purpose of imprisonment, which was not merely custodial and was undoubtedly punitive in the medieval period. Having established that incarceration was employed for a variety of purposes the physicality of prison buildings and the conditions in which prisoners were kept are considered. This research suggests that the periodic complaints that London’s medieval prisons, particularly Newgate, were ‘foul’ with ‘noxious air’ were the result of external, rather than internal, factors. Using both civic and royal sources the management of prisons and the abuses inflicted by some keepers have been analysed. This has revealed that there were very few differences in the way civic and royal prisons were administered; however, there were distinct advantages to being either the keeper or a prisoner of the Fleet prison. Because incarceration was not the only penalty available in the enforcement of law and order, this thesis also considers the offences that constituted a misdemeanour and the various punishments employed by the authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release for the Book of Mordred Published by Houghton
    New from Houghton Mifflin Books for Children FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: Children’[email protected] The famed knight Mordred comes to life in a riveting epic novel, taking another look at his crucial role in the rise and fall of Camelot. The Book of Mordred Written by Vivian Vande Velde # “Vande Velde’s finely crafted diction never falters as the plot builds to its inevitable tragic end.” ––Kirkus Reviews, starred review Dark forces are taking hold in the kingdom of Camelot: King Arthur struggles to keep his knights in line as they steadily divide them- selves into factions; the great Merlin has vanished at the hands of his lover and pupil, Nimue; wizards all over the countryside battle for whatever measures of power they can find. At the center of the mael- strom stands Keira, an innocent girl who possesses the ability to foretell the fate of her world. When Keira is kidnapped from her vil- lage home, her mother, Alayna, flees to Camelot and finds Mordred, an enigmatic knight who will ultimately become Keira’s greatest champion, Alayna’s greatest love, and King Arthur’s greatest enemy. In the tradition of Arthurian legend, Mordred has been characterized as a buffoon, a false knight, and a bloodthirsty traitor. The Book Mordred reveals a mysterious man through the eyes of three woman who love him. This is Vivian Vande Velde’s twenty-fifth book for young readers. She lives in Rochester, New York. More praise for The Book Of Mordred: “[A] richly imagined retelling of traditional lore.”––Booklist “[A]n engrossing read.”––The Bulletin “Fans of traditional Arthurian legend as well as readers unfamiliar with the classic tales should relish this compelling re-imagining of the Arthurian world.”––Voya The Book Of Mordred = August 2005 = Fiction Ages 12 and up = 352 pages = $18.00 = ISBN 0-618-50754-X Available wherever books are sold or by calling 1-800-225-3362 Houghton Mifflin Company • 222 Berkeley Street • Boston, MA 02116 • www.houghtonmifflinbooks.com www.houghtonmifflinbooks.com 1 of 1 Copyright © 2005 Houghton Mifflin Company.
    [Show full text]
  • Geoffrey of Monmouth and the English Past
    Chapter 3 Geoffrey of Monmouth and the English Past Rebecca Thomas Geoffrey does not grant much space to the English in the De gestis Britonum. In one respect, this is unsurprising: Geoffrey’s history extends back to the origins of the Britons in Troy, spending a significant amount of time in pre-Roman Britain, and as such the English enter the narrative rather late in the day. Even after their arrival, however, the English do not appear in the way which we might expect. The traditional narrative of the development of the English kingdoms, pioneered by sources such as Bede’s Ecclesiastical History and the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, and accepted and reproduced by many of Geoffrey’s contemporary Anglo-Norman historians, has no place in the DGB. With his strikingly different version of events, Geoffrey certainly cannot be accused of lacking originality in his treatment of English history. The way in which he approached this subject is highly significant not only for our understanding of his attitude toward the English, but also for the composition of the DGB more generally. There was no shortage of contemporary historians writing of the English past, such as Henry of Huntingdon, the first version of whose History of the English, with which Geoffrey was most likely familiar, was completed by 1130. Henry presents us with a conventional account of English history, drawing heavily on Bede and the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle.1 Hengist and Horsa arrive in Britain in 449, and after recounting their dealings with the Britons, Henry pro- ceeds through the various other Saxon settlers of the 5th and 6th centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction: the Legend of King Arthur
    Department of History University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire “HIC FACET ARTHURUS, REX QUONDAM, REXQUE FUTURUS” THE ANALYSIS OF ORIGINAL MEDIEVAL SOURCES IN THE SEARCH FOR THE HISTORICAL KING ARTHUR Final Paper History 489: Research Seminar Professor Thomas Miller Cooperating Professor: Professor Matthew Waters By Erin Pevan November 21, 2006 1 Copyright for this work is owned by the author. This digital version is published by McIntyre Library, University of Wisconsin – Eau Claire with the consent of the author. 2 Department of History University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire Abstract of: “HIC FACET ARTHURUS, REX QUONDAM, REXQUE FUTURUS” THE ANALYSIS OF ORIGINAL MEDIEVAL SOURCES IN THE SEARCH FOR THE HISTORICAL KING ARTHUR Final Paper History 489: Research Seminar Professor Thomas Miller Cooperating Professor: Matthew Waters By Erin Pevan November 21, 2006 The stories of Arthurian literary tradition have provided our modern age with gripping tales of chivalry, adventure, and betrayal. King Arthur remains a hero of legend in the annals of the British Isles. However, one question remains: did King Arthur actually exist? Early medieval historical sources provide clues that have identified various figures that may have been the template for King Arthur. Such candidates such as the second century Roman general Lucius Artorius Castus, the fifth century Breton leader Riothamus, and the sixth century British leader Ambrosius Aurelianus hold high esteem as possible candidates for the historical King Arthur. Through the analysis of original sources and authors such as the Easter Annals, Nennius, Bede, Gildas, and the Annales Cambriae, parallels can be established which connect these historical figures to aspects of the Arthur of literary tradition.
    [Show full text]
  • Writing and Literary Study Spring 2010 the Chivalrous Sir Gawain If
    Ahmed 1 Sarin Taslima Ahmed College Writing II: Writing and Literary Study Spring 2010 The Chivalrous Sir Gawain If a man does not open the door for a woman, she may think chivalry is dead or forget that it ever existed at all. Today's woman is not a damsel in distress, but rather stands on equal ground with her masculine counterpart. She has no need to acknowledge that there was ever a time when men lived and died for the sake of honor. However, around 1066 a.d. to 1485 a.d., that was exactly what European knights, and those around the world, did (Achlin). Of these brave soldiers, the most famous were the Knights of the Round Table, subjects of Camelot and King Arthur. Perhaps the most acclaimed knights are dubbed Sir Lancelot and Sir Gawain. Lancelot is still known as the greatest of all knights, the perfect knight, but based on Gawain's actions in Sir Gawain and the Green Knight by the Pearl Poet and those of Lancelot in The Once and Future King by T.H. White, I've come to the conclusion that Gawain is a greater model of chivalry than Lancelot. Following the code of chivalry, Gawain is faithful to God, his King, and he is respectful to women. Lancelot is very talented, but he does not feel the need to follow the laws of knighthood, and ends up disregarding King Arthur, Queen Guinevere and even God because of it. "Two virtues above all else were held to mark the good knight and bring him honor.
    [Show full text]
  • A Welsh Classical Dictionary
    A WELSH CLASSICAL DICTIONARY DACHUN, saint of Bodmin. See s.n. Credan. He has been wrongly identified with an Irish saint Dagan in LBS II.281, 285. G.H.Doble seems to have been misled in the same way (The Saints of Cornwall, IV. 156). DAGAN or DANOG, abbot of Llancarfan. He appears as Danoc in one of the ‘Llancarfan Charters’ appended to the Life of St.Cadog (§62 in VSB p.130). Here he is a clerical witness with Sulien (presumably abbot) and king Morgan [ab Athrwys]. He appears as abbot of Llancarfan in five charters in the Book of Llandaf, where he is called Danoc abbas Carbani Uallis (BLD 179c), and Dagan(us) abbas Carbani Uallis (BLD 158, 175, 186b, 195). In these five charters he is contemporary with bishop Berthwyn and Ithel ap Morgan, king of Glywysing. He succeeded Sulien as abbot and was succeeded by Paul. See Trans.Cym., 1948 pp.291-2, (but ignore the dates), and compare Wendy Davies, LlCh p.55 where Danog and Dagan are distinguished. Wendy Davies dates the BLD charters c.A.D.722 to 740 (ibid., pp.102 - 114). DALLDAF ail CUNIN COF. (Legendary). He is included in the tale of ‘Culhwch and Olwen’ as one of the warriors of Arthur's Court: Dalldaf eil Kimin Cof (WM 460, RM 106). In a triad (TYP no.73) he is called Dalldaf eil Cunyn Cof, one of the ‘Three Peers’ of Arthur's Court. In another triad (TYP no.41) we are told that Fferlas (Grey Fetlock), the horse of Dalldaf eil Cunin Cof, was one of the ‘Three Lovers' Horses’ (or perhaps ‘Beloved Horses’).
    [Show full text]
  • Malory's Launcelot and Guinevere Abed Togydirs Betsy Taylor
    Malory's Launcelot and Guinevere abed togydirs Betsy Taylor In Malory's account of the ambush of Launcelot in Guinevere's chamber he obliquely denies the authority of his sources: For, as the Freynshhe booke seyth, the quene and sir Launcelot were k>gydirs. And whether they were abed other at other maner of disportis, me lyste nat thereof make no mencion, for love that tyme was nat as love ys nowadayes.1 · Both his sources put Launcelot and Guinevere abed,2 but Malory says he prefers not to discuss the matter ('me lyste nat thereof make no mencion'); instead he links the lovers' activities here with the love he anatomizes, however cumbersomely, at the beginning of 'The Knight of the Cart' episode: But the olde love was nat so. For men and women coude love togydirs seven yerys, and no lycoures lustis was betwyxte them, and than was love trouthe and faythefulnes. And so in lyke wyse was used such love in kynge Arthurs dayes. (p. 1120, II. 2...{1) The benefit of Malory's reticence is twofold: he places (or attempts to place) the lovers beyond contemporary criticism, 'for love that tyme was nat as love ys nowadayes'; and he ensures that the image of Launcelot which dominates in this episode is that of the 'noble knyght' who 'toke hys swerde undir hys arme, and so he walked in hys mantell ... and put hymselff in grete jouparte' (p. 1165, 11. 5-7). In Malory's version of the episode we pass from this image to 'Madame,' seyde sir Launcelot, 'ys there here ony armour within you that myght cover my body wythall?' (p.
    [Show full text]