Sandstone Units of the Lee Formation and Related Strata in Eastern Kentucky

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sandstone Units of the Lee Formation and Related Strata in Eastern Kentucky GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER Prepared in cooperation with the Kentucky Geological Survey Sandstone Units of the Lee Formation and Related Strata in Eastern Kentucky By CHARLES L. RICE With a section on Lee and Breathitt Formations along the northwestern part of the eastern Kentucky coal field By CHARLES L. RICE and GORDON W. WEIR CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE GEOLOGY OF KENTUCKY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1 1 51-G Prepared in cooperation with the Kentucky Geological Survey Descriptions of the Lee Formation with a discussion of related stratigraphic units and the paleogeography of eastern Kentucky and adjoining areas of Early and Middle Pennsylvanian Ages UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1984 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WILLIAM P. CLARK, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Rice, Charles L. Sandstone units of the Lee formation and related strata in eastern Kentucky. (Geological Survey professional paper ; 1151 - G) Bibliography: p. Supt. of Docs, no.: 119.16:1151 - G 1. Sandstone Kentucky. 2. Geology, Stratigraphic Pennsylvanian. I. Kentucky Geological Survey. II. Title. III. Series. QE471.15.S25R53 1983 552'.5 82-600381 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract ____________________________________ Gl Pennington and Lee Formations in the area of the Cumberland Introduction __________________________________ 2 overthrust sheet Continued Purpose and scope of study ____________________ 2 Lee Formation Continued Previous work _____________________________ 3 Hensley Member ______-_______--.-----_. G23 Geographic setting __________________________ 3 Bee Rock Sandstone and Naese Sandstone Members . 25 Acknowledgments ---.-.____-________________ 8 Lee and Breathitt Formations along the northwestern part of the Geologic setting ____________________________ 8 eastern Kentucky coal field by C. L. Rice and G. W. Weir _ 27 Lower boundary of the Pennsylvanian System ________ 11 Livingston Conglomerate Member of the Lee Formation and General Outline of the Pennsylvanian System in eastern the related sandstone units _____--__--__--_-__ 29 Kentucky __________________________________ 16 Rockcastle Conglomerate Member of the Lee Formation _ 32 Pennington and Lee Formations in the area of the Cumberland Unnamed quartzose sandstone units below the Corbin overthrust sheet _____________________________ 18 Sandstone Member along the Pottsville Escarpment _ _ 33 Pennington Formation ________________________ 18 Corbin Sandstone Member of the Lee Formation ______ 34 Lee Formation _____________________________ 18 Grayson sandstone bed of Whittington and Ferm _____ 37 Pinnacle Overlook Member __________________ 18 Environment of deposition of sandstone units in the Lee Chadwell Member --_._--.____-___________ 20 Formation _______________-___-___-__-__-._. 39 White Rocks Sandstone Member ______________ 21 Paleogeography ______________________-__-.---. 41 Dark Ridge Member ______________________ 21 Problems related to the Lee Formation deserving further study _ 49 Middlesboro Member ______________________ 21 References cited _______--__-_----------.----_-- 50 ILLUSTRATIONS FIGURE 1. Quadrangle index _________________________________________.---------_---_- G4 2. Physiographic diagram of Kentucky __________________________-___-__--_.-_-----------------_- 9 3. Geographic Setting of Eastern Kentucky _______________________________--_-_-_--_--_-----_----- 10 4. Geologic map of the sub-Pennsylvanian surface ________________________-__--__--_.--_------------- 12 5. Generalized section showing remnant northwest-facing cuestas ___-____-__-_--___-__------------------_ 13 6. Contour map of the base of the Pennsylvanian System ______________________-___--_-_------------_- 15 7. Geologic map of the Pennsylvanian formations of eastern Kentucky __________-___-__--_----_-----_-----_ 17 8. Correlation chart of the Pennington, Lee, and Hance Formations in the Cumberland overthrust sheet ____--_-..-_- 19 9. View of Pinnacle Overlook Member of the Lee Formation ____________________-__-._._--_--_- 20 10. Ripple bedding in upper part of the Pinnacle Overlook Member _______-___--_--__--_--__--__--_--_---- 20 11. Map showing the distribution of the Dark Ridge Member of the Lee Formation ____________________________ 22 12. View of dipping strata of the Middlesboro Member of the Lee Formation _______________-___-____-------._ 23 13. Map showing thickness contours of the Middlesboro Member of the Lee Formation __________________________ 24 14. Basal conglomeratic beds of the Middlesboro Member of the Lee Formation. ________________.___--__---___ 25 15. View of Hanging Rock on U.S. Highway 421 near Harlan, Ky ____________________--_--__--------_--_- 25 16. Map showing the thickness contours for the Bee Rock and Naese Sandstone Members ______-__-_-_--_--_---__ 26 17. Map showing the distribution of the Livingston and Rockcastle Conglomerate and Corbin Sandstone Members ________ 28 18. Schematic cross section showing relations of major members of the Lee Formation _____________-__---_.-.--- 29 19. Outlier of the Pottsville Escarpment showing the Livingston Conglomerate Member of the Lee Formation ______.-_. 30 20. Maps showing the Livingston channel and thickness of the Livingston Conglomerate Member ___________.__---_. 31 21. Planar sets of beds in the Livingston Conglomerate Member showing stringers and lenses of pebbles along bedding planes _ 32 22. View of the edge of a sandstone- and conglomerate-filled channel cut into Newman Limestone _-____-____-_--.--. 33 23. Massive quartz-pebble conglomerate on Pilot Knob ____________________-__--__---_--_-------_------ 34 24. Crossbedded conglomerate and conglomeratic sandstone on Pilot Knob _____--__--__-_----_--_-------_--_ 35 25. Cross sections showing relations of sandstone units on west edge of the Cumberland Plateau _-___-._-----__-.-- 36 26. Cliffs developed in the Corbin Sandstone Member of the Lee Formation ______________--___--.--_--__-___ 37 27. Map showing thickness contours of the Corbin Sandstone Member ___________________-__---_-_--__--.-_ 38 m IV CONTENTS 28. Dip-directions of crossbeds in the Corbin Sandstone Member ........_....____...__.__...__-.__------- G40 29. Trough sets of crossbeds in the Corbin Sandstone Member of the Lee Formation .__..._......_..___.____-.. 41 30. Map showing outcrop of Pennsylvanian rocks and limits of Mississippian carbonate formations .....__..__.____... 42 31. Map showing locations of Pennsylvanian channels in areas other than eastern Kentucky .__.__._.........___... 43 32. Map of pre-Pennsylvanian streams and rivers ___----------..------------------------------------ 44 33. Map showing breaching of drainage divide in Early Pennsylvanian time _---.----------------------------- 45 34. Map showing major stream captures _________________------.---------------------------------- 46 35. Map showing westward migration of distributaries in Early Pennsylvanian time .......---_--------...------ 47 36. Map showing the configuration of the Sharon drainage system in early Middle Pennsylvanian time ......__.____... 48 TABLE Page TABLE 1. List of U.S. Geological Survey Geologic Quadrangle (GQ) maps for eastern Kentucky .........._----_...---.-. G5 CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE GEOLOGY OF KENTUCKY SANDSTONE UNITS OF THE LEE FORMATION AND RELATED STRATA IN EASTERN KENTUCKY By CHARLES L. RICE ABSTRACT bers commonly are bimodal, resultant transport directions for both marine and terrestrial members are southwesterly as determined by Most of the Cumberland Plateau region of southeastern Kentucky crossbedding. is underlain by thick sequences of quartzose sandstone which are as­ Thickness variations of the Middlesboro Member in the Cumber­ signed for the most part to the Lee Formation. Much new informa­ land overthrust sheet suggest that it represents fills of at least three tion has been gathered about the Lee and related strata as a result major southwesterly trending paleovalleys. Thickness variations of of the cooperative mapping program of the U.S. Geological Survey the Bee Rock Sandstone Member east of Rocky Face fault and the and the Kentucky Geological Survey between 1960 and 1978. This re­ combined Bee Rock and Naese Sandstone Members west of Rocky port summarizes the age, lithology, distribution, sedimentary struc­ Face fault suggest that these members represent fills of at least two tures, and stratigraphic relations of the sandstone units of the Lee major southwesterly trending paleovalleys. East of Rocky Face fault, within and between each of three major outcrop belts in Kentucky: the Bee Rock is generally the uppermost member of the Lee; west Cumberland Mountain, Pine Mountain, and the Pottsville Escarp­ of the fault, the overlying Naese is at the top. The Naese may range ment area. in age from Early to Middle Pennsylvanian and is partly or wholly The Lee Formation generally has been regarded as Early Pennsyl- equivalent to the Rockcastle Sandstone member of the Lee Forma­ vanian in age and separated from Mississippian strata in Kentucky by tion in the area of the Pottsville Escarpment. The Mississippian- an unconformity. However, lithostratigraphic units included in the Pennsylvanian systemic boundary in the area of the Cumberland formation as presently defined are broadly time-transgressive and overthrust sheet in most places has been placed at an unconformity range in age from Late Mississippian in parts
Recommended publications
  • East and Central Farming and Forest Region and Atlantic Basin Diversified Farming Region: 12 Lrrs N and S
    East and Central Farming and Forest Region and Atlantic Basin Diversified Farming Region: 12 LRRs N and S Brad D. Lee and John M. Kabrick 12.1 Introduction snowfall occurs annually in the Ozark Highlands, the Springfield Plateau, and the St. Francois Knobs and Basins The central, unglaciated US east of the Great Plains to the MLRAs. In the southern half of the region, snowfall is Atlantic coast corresponds to the area covered by LRR N uncommon. (East and Central Farming and Forest Region) and S (Atlantic Basin Diversified Farming Region). These regions roughly correspond to the Interior Highlands, Interior Plains, 12.2.2 Physiography Appalachian Highlands, and the Northern Coastal Plains. The topography of this region ranges from broad, gently rolling plains to steep mountains. In the northern portion of 12.2 The Interior Highlands this region, much of the Springfield Plateau and the Ozark Highlands is a dissected plateau that includes gently rolling The Interior Highlands occur within the western portion of plains to steeply sloping hills with narrow valleys. Karst LRR N and includes seven MLRAs including the Ozark topography is common and the region has numerous sink- Highlands (116A), the Springfield Plateau (116B), the St. holes, caves, dry stream valleys, and springs. The region also Francois Knobs and Basins (116C), the Boston Mountains includes many scenic spring-fed rivers and streams con- (117), Arkansas Valley and Ridges (118A and 118B), and taining clear, cold water (Fig. 12.2). The elevation ranges the Ouachita Mountains (119). This region comprises from 90 m in the southeastern side of the region and rises to 176,000 km2 in southern Missouri, northern and western over 520 m on the Springfield Plateau in the western portion Arkansas, and eastern Oklahoma (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • The Logan Plateau, a Young Physiographic Region in West Virginia, Kentucky, Virginia, and Tennessee
    The Logan Plateau, a Young Physiographic Region in West Virginia, Kentucky, Virginia, and Tennessee U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1620 . II • r ,j • • ~1 =1 i1 .. ·~ II .I '1 .ill ~ I ... ... II 'II .fi :. I !~ ...1 . ~ !,~ .,~ 'I ~ J ·-=· ..I ·~ tJ 1;1 .. II "'"l ,,'\. d • .... ·~ I 3: ... • J ·~ •• I -' -\1 - I =,. The Logan Plateau, a Young Physiographic Region in West Virginia, Kentucky, Virginia, and Tennessee By WILLIAM F. OUTERBRIDGE A highly dissected plateau with narrow valleys, steep slopes, narrow crested ridges, and landslides developed on flat-lying Pennsylvanian shales and subgraywacke sandstone during the past 1.5 million years U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1620 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL HODEL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1987 For sale by the Books and Open-File Reports Section, U.S. Geological Survey, Federal Center, Box 25425, Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Outerbridge, William F. The Logan Plateau, a young physiographic region in West Virginia, Kentucky, Virginia, and Tennessee. (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1620) Bibliography: p. 18. Supt. of Docs. no.: I 19.3:1620 1. Geomorphology-Logan Plateau. I. Title. II. Series. QE75.B9 no. 1620 557.3 s [551.4'34'0975] 84-600132 [GB566.L6] CONTENTS Abstract 1 Introduction 1 Methods of study 3 Geomorphology 4 Stratigraphy 9 Structure 11 Surficial deposits 11 Distribution of residuum 11 Depth of weathering 11 Soils 11 Landslides 11 Derivative maps of the Logan Plateau and surrounding area 12 History of drainage development since late Tertiary time 13 Summary and conclusions 17 References cited 18 PLATES [Plates are in pocket] 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 08 Wv History Reader Fain.Pdf
    Early Black Migration and the Post-emancipation Black Community in Cabell County,West Virginia, 1865-1871 Cicero Fain ABSTRACT West Virginia’s formation divided many groups within the new state. Grievances born of secession inflamed questions of taxation, political representation, and constitutional change, and greatly complicated black aspirations during the state’s formative years. Moreover, long-standing attitudes on race and slavery held great sway throughout Appalachia. Thus, the quest by the state’s black residents to achieve the full measure of freedom in the immediate post-Civil War years faced formidable challenges.To meet the mandates for statehood recognition established by President Lincoln, the state’s legislators were forced to rectify a particularly troublesome conundrum: how to grant citizenship to the state’s black residents as well as to its former Confederates. While both populations eventually garnered the rights of citizenship, the fact that a significant number of southern West Virginia’s black residents departed the region suggests that the political gains granted to them were not enough to stem the tide of out-migration during the state’s formative years, from 1863 to 1870. 4 CICERO FAIN / EARLY BLACK MIGRATION IN CABELL COUNTY ARTICLE West Virginia’s formation divided many groups within the new state. Grievances born of secession inflamed questions of taxation, political representation, and constitutional change, and greatly complicated black aspirations during the state’s formative years. It must be remembered that in 1860 the black population in the Virginia counties comprising the current state of West Virginia totaled only 5.9 percent of the general population, with most found in the western Virginia mountain region.1 Moreover, long-standing attitudes on race and slavery held great sway throughout Appalachia.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Devonian Marcellus Shale—Valley and Ridge Province
    Geology of the Devonian Marcellus Shale—Valley and Ridge Province, Virginia and West Virginia— A Field Trip Guidebook for the American Association of Petroleum Geologists Eastern Section Meeting, September 28–29, 2011 Open-File Report 2012–1194 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Geology of the Devonian Marcellus Shale—Valley and Ridge Province, Virginia and West Virginia— A Field Trip Guidebook for the American Association of Petroleum Geologists Eastern Section Meeting, September 28–29, 2011 By Catherine B. Enomoto1, James L. Coleman, Jr.1, John T. Haynes2, Steven J. Whitmeyer2, Ronald R. McDowell3, J. Eric Lewis3, Tyler P. Spear3, and Christopher S. Swezey1 1U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA 20192 2 James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA 22807 3 West Virginia Geological and Economic Survey, Morgantown, WV 26508 Open-File Report 2012–1194 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Ken Salazar, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate of the Southeast United States
    N$%"',$! C!"#$%& A++&++#&,% R&."',$! T&/),"/$! I,0*% R&0'1% S&1"&+ C!"#$%& '( %)& S'*%)&$+% U,"%&- S%$%&+ VARIABILITY, CHANGE, IMPACTS, AND VULNERABILITY Edited by: Keith T. Ingram Kirstin Dow Lynne Carter Julie Anderson Climate of the Southeast United States Variability, Change, Impacts, and Vulnerability © 2013 Southeast Climate Consortium All rights reserved under International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions. Reproduction of this report by electronic means for personal and noncommercial purposes ȱĴȱȱȱȱȱ ȱȱǯȱȱȱȱȱ ¢ȱȱȱȱȱ ȱȱȱȱ ȱȱȱ ȱ ȱȱȱ Ĵȱȱȱȱǯ ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱǯ Printed on recycled, acid-free paper ȱȱȱȱȱȱ Citation: ǰȱ ǯǰȱ ǯȱ ǰȱǯȱǰȱ ǯȱǰȱǯȱŘŖŗřǯȱȱȱȱȱ ȱDZȱ¢ǰȱǰȱǰȱȱ¢ǯȱȱDZȱ ȱǯ Keywords:ȱȬĴȬȱǰȱǰȱǰȱȱ¢ǰȱ ǰȱǰȱȱǰȱ¢ǰȱȱ ǰȱȱǰȱ climate impacts, climate modeling, climate variability, coastal, drought, education, electric ȱǰȱ¡ȱ ǰȱĚǰȱȱǰȱ£ǰȱȱȱǰȱ ȱ ǰȱǰȱȬȱǰȱǰȱǰȱǰȱȱȱ ǰȱȱęǰȱȱǰȱǰȱȱǰȱǰȱȬ ȱ intrusion, sea level rise, silviculture, social vulnerability, Southeast, storm surge, tropical ǰȱǰȱ¢ǰȱǯǯȱȱ ǰȱȬȱǰȱ ȱǰȱ ǰȱ ę ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ ¢ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ¢ȱȱ¢ȱǰȱǰȱǰȱȱ Tribal Government or Non-governmental entity. Front Cover Images: ȱǰȱ ǰȱ¢ȱȱȱȱȱȱ ȂȱȱǻǼǯȱȱȱ¢ȱ ȱȱȱȱDZȱ ȱ¢ȱȱȱ ȱǰȱ¢ȱȱȱȱȱDzȱ¢ȱȱ ȱȱ ȱȱȱǰȱȱ ǯȱDzȱȱȱȱǰȱ¢ȱȱ ȱȱȱȱȱDzȱȱ ȱȱȱǻǼȱȱȱ ȱǰȱ ¢ȱȱDzȱȱĚ ȱȱȱȱȱǰȱ¢ȱȱȱȱ ȱDzȱȱȱȱǰȱǰȱǰȱȱĴǯ About This Series This report is published as one of a series of technical inputs to the Third National ȱȱǻǼȱǯȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ ȱȱ ȱȱȱȱȱŗşşŖǰȱ ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ and Congress every four years on the status of climate change science and impacts. The NCA informs the nation about already observed changes, the current status of the climate, and anticipated trends for the future. The NCA report process integrates ęȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ¢ȱęȱȱ ęȱȱȱȱ ǯȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ- ȱȱȱȱȱ¢ȱǯǯȱ£ǰȱȱȱȱȱ¢ȱȱ ȱȱȱ¢ȱȱȱȱȱȂȱǯ ȱȱȱŘŖŗŗǰȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ¡ȱȱ ǰȱȱ¢ǰȱȱȱȱǰȱȬȱ£- ǰȱȱǰȱȱȱǰȱ ȱȱȱȱȱȱ Ĵȱȱȱȱȱǯȱ ȱǰȱȱȱȱǰȱȱ ȱȱ ȱȱȱȱȱȱǰȱ ȱȱȱȱȱ input reports highlighting past climate trends, projected climate change, and impacts ȱęȱȱȱȱǯȱȱȱȱȱ ȱȱȱ- ing this technical input.
    [Show full text]
  • The Weather and Climate of West Virginia
    ISTOCKPHOTO/CARROLLMT West Virginia by Dr. Kevin T. Law and H. Michael Mogil The Tibbet Knob overlook in George Washington National Forest. est Virginia is a geographically moves a direct Atlantic Ocean influence from its small state that only covers about weather and climate and ensures that the state’s 24,000 square miles. However, climate is more continental than maritime. The due to two distinct two pan- Allegheny Mountains run north to south along Whandles that protrude to the north and east, the the Virginia border and are largely responsible for state’s dimensions are actually 200 miles square. the state’s east-to-west climatological changes. The northern tip extends farther north than The highest point in the state, Spruce Knob, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, while the eastern tip has an elevation of 4,863 feet above sea level. is only 60 miles from Washington, D.C. In ad- In fact, the mean elevation in the state is about dition, the southernmost point is farther south 1,500 feet, which is the highest for any state east than Richmond, Virginia, while the westernmost of the Mississippi River. This is more than 500 point is farther west than Port Huron, Michigan. feet higher than Pennsylvania, the second high- The unusual shape and location of the state has est mean elevation for a state. The topography coined the phrase, “West Virginia is the most varies greatly by county, with some individual southern of the northern states, the most north- counties exhibiting elevation changes of more ern of the southern states, and the most western than 3,000 feet.
    [Show full text]
  • CONTROLS on DOLOMITIZATION of the UPPER ORDOVICIAN TRENTON LIMESTONE in SOUTH-CENTRAL KENTUCKY COLLIN JAMES GRAY Department Of
    CONTROLS ON DOLOMITIZATION OF THE UPPER ORDOVICIAN TRENTON LIMESTONE IN SOUTH-CENTRAL KENTUCKY COLLIN JAMES GRAY Department of Geological Sciences APPROVED: Dr. Katherine Giles, Ph.D., Chair Dr. Richard Langford, Ph.D. Dr. Matthew Johnston, Ph.D. Charles Ambler, Ph.D. Dean of the Graduate School Copyright © by Collin James Gray 2015 Dedication I dedicate my thesis work to my family. My dedicated and loving parents, Michael and Deborah Gray have always supported me and provided words of encouragement during the struggles of my research. The support provided was second to none and I could not imagine reaching this point in my education without them. I also dedicate this thesis to my two brothers, Michael and Nathan Gray and my sister Nicole Gray. Without these role models I cannot imagine where my education would have ended. I will always appreciate the support provided by all three of you and consider you to be role models that I can always look up to. CONTROLS ON DOLOMITIZATION OF THE UPPER ORDOVICIAN TRENTON LIMESTONE IN SOUTH-CENTRAL KENTUCKY by COLLIN JAMES GRAY, B.S. GEOLOGY THESIS Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at El Paso in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Geological Sciences THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO December 2015 Acknowledgements I wish to thank my committee whose time and expertise provided excellent input into my research. Dr. Katherine Giles, my M.S. supervisor provided guidance and provided endless suggestions and recommendations throughout my research while continuously motivating me to continue my education.
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLOGIC SUMMARY of the APPALACHIAN BASIN, with REFERENCE to the SUBSURFACE DISPOSAL of RADIOACTIVE WASTE SOLUTIONS by George W
    TEI-791 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY" GEOLOGIC SUMMARY OF THE APPALACHIAN BASIN, WITH;REFERENCE TO THE SUBSURFACE DISPOSAL OF RADIOACTIVE WASTE SOLUTIONS* By George W. Colton June 1961 Report TEI-791 This report is preliminary and ha^;not been edited for conformity with G^logical Survey format and nomenclature. ?1 ^Prepared on behalf of the U. S. Atomic Energy Commission. CONTENTS Abstract* .......................... 5 Introduction. ........................ 7 Purpose of report. ................... 7 Organization of report .................. 7 Location and extent of area. .............. Q Acknowledgments. .................... 10 Geologic framework. ..................... 10 Depositional framework ................. 10 Structural framework .................. llj. Stratigraphy. ........................ 17 Late Precambrian stratified sequence .......... 17 Early Cambrian clastic sequence. ............ 18 Thickness and depth ................ 22 Cambrian-Ordovician carbonate sequence ......... 23 Thickness and depth . , ........... 35 Late Ordovician clastic sequence ............ 35 Thickness and depth ................ Mi- Early Silurian clastic sequence. ............ kk Thickness and depth ................ 51 Silurian-Devonian carbonate sequence .......... 52 Thickness and depth ................ 62 Devonian classic sequence. ............... 63 Thickness and depth ................ 69 Mississippian sequence ................. 70 Thickness and depth ................ 79 Pennsylvanian sequence ................. 79 Waste
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Sources of Native Grass Seed for Revegetation in Florida by Mary J
    Developing Sources of Native Grass Seed for Revegetation in Florida By Mary J. Williams, Janet Grabowski, and Brandee Williams ing, From Dusty Trails to Waning Wetlands.i In this article, we On the Ground provide some background for this effort and its current status. • As with much of the eastern United States, the na­ tive plant communities present in Florida when Euro­ History of “Improvements” in Florida pean settlers arrived have been converted to crop­ Unlike most of the eastern United States, which was heav­ land, pastureland, and industrial forest production. ily wooded when European settlers arrived, early settlers • Increasingly, both public and private entities have in Florida were confronted with almost 34 million acres of been making efforts to restore some of the con­ native range vegetation.1 The native vegetation on Florida verted acreage to a semblance of the original rangelands included grasses and grasslike species (e.g., sedges plant community for reasons of water quality, wild­ and rushes), forbs, and shrubs suitable for grazing and brows­ life habitat, and aesthetics. ing use by livestock and wildlife. An overstory of trees was • The lack of a commercial source of seed for Florida found on some range sites, whereas others were composed of ecotypes of native grasses is one of the main costs mostly herbaceous plants. Currently, only about seven million associated with current revegetation efforts. acres of native rangeland remain in the state. • A long-term program, by the USDA, NRCS, In Florida, inadvertent loss of the native rangeland veg­ Brooksville Plant Materials Center and various etation through improper grazing management often neces­ cooperating public and private institutions, has sitated “improvements” to maintain adequate forage produc­ fostered the development of a commercial, native tion.
    [Show full text]
  • (Foram in Ifers, Algae) and Stratigraphy, Carboniferous
    MicropaIeontoIogicaI Zonation (Foramin ifers, Algae) and Stratigraphy, Carboniferous Peratrovich Formation, Southeastern Alaska By BERNARD L. MAMET, SYLVIE PINARD, and AUGUSTUS K. ARMSTRONG U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 2031 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Robert M. Hirsch, Acting Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government Text and illustrations edited by Mary Lou Callas Line drawings prepared by B.L. Mamet and Stephen Scott Layout and design by Lisa Baserga UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1993 For sale by Book and Open-File Report Sales U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center, Box 25286 Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Mamet, Bernard L. Micropaleontological zonation (foraminifers, algae) and stratigraphy, Carboniferous Peratrovich Formation, southeastern Alaska / by Bernard L. Mamet, Sylvie Pinard, and Augustus K. Armstrong. p. cm.-(U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 2031) Includes bibtiographical references. 1. Geology, Stratigraphic-Carboniferous. 2. Geology-Alaska-Prince of Wales Island. 3. Foraminifera, Fossil-Alaska-Prince of Wales Island. 4. Algae, Fossil-Alaska-Prince of Wales Island. 5. Paleontology- Carboniferous. 6. Paleontology-Alaska-Prince of Wales Island. I. Pinard, Sylvie. II. Armstrong, Augustus K. Ill. Title. IV. Series. QE75.B9 no. 2031 [QE671I 557.3 s--dc20 [551.7'5'097982] 92-32905 CIP CONTENTS Abstract
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Ground- Water Resources of the Paducah Area Kentucky
    Geology and Ground- Water Resources of the Paducah Area Kentucky By H. L. FREE, JR., W. H. WALKER, and L. M. MAcCARY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1417 Prepared in cooperation with the Agricultural and Industrial Development Board, Commonwealth of Kentucky UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON i 1957 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRED A. SEATON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. CONTENTS Page Abstract _____---._--__ _--___--_---___ __ 1 Introduction. _______ __________________-_--_------_-----__-_ 2- Purpose and'scope of investigation.- _____-_____-------------_--_ 2 Location and extent of area__________ ____-_---_ -_-_----_-_ 4 Previous investigations-.________________-____-_--_---_-------_- 4 Methods of investigation and presentation of data. ________ 5 Well-numbering system _______________________-_-__-__--_--_ 5 Acknowledgments_ _______-______-__--_---_------------_------ 7 Geography ___________ _____________________________________ 7 Natural features of the region __________--_---_------_--_-- -- 7 Topography and drainage____________________---_-_ - -_ 7 Climate __________-______>.____ ___________________ 8 Vegetation.____ _-______-__--_-__------_------_--__-__----- 11 Natural resources...-._______-_______-__-__-_----_------- __ 11 Development. __ __________________________-______-__-__--_-.-_ 11 Population______________________________________________ 11 Industries_____________________-___-____--_-______---_-_
    [Show full text]
  • Redox Changes in the Deep Shelf of the East Baltic Basin in the Aeronian and Early Telychian (Early Silurian)
    Proc. Estonian Acad. Sci. Geol., 2004, 53, 2, 94–124 Redox changes in the deep shelf of the East Baltic Basin in the Aeronian and early Telychian (early Silurian) Enli Kiipli Institute of Geology at Tallinn University of Technology, Estonia pst. 7, 10143 Tallinn, Estonia; [email protected] Received 27 March 2003, in revised form 11 February 2004 Abstract. Aeronian black shales and overlying Telychian greenish-grey and red claystones of the deep shelf of the East Baltic Basin indicate different synsedimentary redox conditions of the bottom water of the sea. In the Aeronian, the primary bioproductivity rise caused accumulation of organic- rich black shale in deep shelf and formation of microcrystalline limestone with chertification, chert nodules, and barite in shoreward areas. In the early Telychian, the bioproductivity decreased, as concluded from the absence of indicators of high primary bioproductivity in the Aeronian. The suggested mechanism regulating primary bioproductivity and oxygen content of bottom waters of deep shelf was a change from wind-induced upwelling in the Aeronian to downwelling in the Telychian. The sedimentation rate did not influence the change in the redox regime of the deep shelf sediment, as it was low for both the Aeronian and Telychian. Key words: Aeronian, Telychian, East Baltic deep shelf, redox conditions, up- and downwellings. INTRODUCTION Differences in lithology, mineralogy, and rock chemistry evidence changes at the Aeronian–Telychian boundary. The changes concern sea water chemistry and early diagenesis of sediments with implication on hydrodynamic and atmospheric circulation, and palaeogeography. The area of investigation is southwest Estonia and west Latvia, which form a central, deeper part of the Palaeozoic East Baltic basin, treated here as the deep shelf.
    [Show full text]