Road Safety Country Overview – Romania

Traffic Safety Basic Facts 2013 - Main Figures

Traffic Safety Basic Facts 2015 RoadUrban Areas Safety Country Overview

Romania Road Safety Country Overview – Romania

Structure and Culture

Basic data

Table 1: Basic data of Romania in relation to the EU average Basic data of Romania EU average* - Population: 19,9 million inhabitants (2013) [2] 18,1 million (2013) - Area: 238.391 km2 (2013) 156.478 km2 (2013) (Water 3,56%) (2015)[4] 3% water (2013) - Climate and weather conditions (capital city; (2015) 2015) [3]: - Average winter temperature (Nov. to April): 8,5°C 14°C - Average summer temperature (May to Oct.): 21,4°C 18,9°C - Annual precipitation level: 595 mm 651 mm - Exposure: 73,3 billion vehicle km (2010) [5] 153,7 billion vehicle km (2012)1 - 0,28 vehicles per person (2013) [2] 0,65 (2013) Sources: [1] IRTAD; [2] EUROSTAT; [3] national sources; [4] CIA ; [5] DG MOVE Romania has a low GDP per capita and few vehicles per person. Country characteristics

Table 2: Characteristics of Romania in comparison to the EU average Characteristics of Romania EU average* - Population density: 84 inhabitants/km2 (2013) 115 inhabitants/km2 [2] (2013) - Population composition (2013) [2]: 15,5% children (0-14 years) 15,6% children 67,9% adults (15-64 years) 65,9% adults 16,6% elderly (65 years and over) 18,5% elderly (2015) [1,2] - Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita: €26.763 (2013) €7.234 (2013) [2] - 54,6% of population lives inside urban area 73% (2015) (2015) [4] - Special characteristics[4]: about 25% of the roads in Romania is well passable and the motorway network is small but still expanding Sources: [1] IRTAD; [2] EUROSTAT; [3] national sources; [4] CIA

*The European average is calculated based on the latest data available for the 28 EU countries 1 Based on 18 EU countries (excl. BG, ES, HR, IT, CY, LT, LU, HU, MT); data of EE, LV, PL, RO (2010); data of SK (2000); data of EL (1998)

- 2 - Road Safety Country Overview – Romania

Structure of road safety management Policy making is centralised in Romania.

The following key-actors are responsible for Road Safety (RS) policy making:

Table 3: Key actors per function in Romania Key functions Key actors

1. - The Sectoral Operational Programme "Transport" - Formulation of national - Romanian Road Authority RS strategy - Ministry of Transports and Infrastructure − - Setting targets Directorate for Road Transport Ministry of - Development of the RS Transports and Infrastructure programme - Directorate for Road Transport 2. Monitoring of the RS development in the - Romanian Road Authority country Road safety policy is 3. Improvements in road - Romanian Road Authority centralised in Romania. infrastructure

4. Vehicle improvement - Romanian Automotive Register 5. Improvement in road user education - Romanian Road Authority - Road Traffic Assistance Association

6. Publicity campaigns - Traffic Police

7. Enforcement of road - The Traffic Police (under Ministry of traffic laws Administration and Interior) 8. Other relevant actors

Sources: national sources

Attitudes towards risk taking As Romania is not part of the SARTRE surveys, there is no information on attitudes that is comparable to other European countries.

- 3 - Road Safety Country Overview – Romania

Programmes and measures

National strategic plans and targets - The national road safety plan of Romania has not yet been approved in parliament. The national road safety plan - Targets (referred to 2010): of Romania has not yet been approved. Table 4: Road safety targets for Romania Year Fatalities

2020 -50%

 Priority topics: - Measures based on human factor insights - Strengthening and consolidating the institutional capacity - Training and examination of drivers - Improving psychological evaluation - Law enforcement - Vehicle and road infrastructure safety - Mobility in transport

(Sources: DG-TREN, 2010; national sources)

Road infrastructure

Table 5: Description of the road categories and their characteristics in Romania Road type General speed limits (km/h) Urban roads 50 Rural roads 90/100 Motorways 110/130 Source: EC DG-Move, 2015

 Special rules for: no information

 Guidelines and strategic plans for infrastructure: no information

Table 6: Obligatory parts of infrastructure management in Romania and other EU countries Obligatory parts in Romania EU countries with obligation

Romania has already Safety impact assessment: - 32% implemented road safety Road safety audits: yes 81% audits and inspections. Road safety inspections: yes 89% High risk site treatment: - 74% Sources: DG-TREN, 2010; national sources

 Recent activities of road infrastructure improvement have been addressing: no information

- 4 - Road Safety Country Overview – Romania

Traffic laws and regulations

Table 7: Description of the regulations in Romania in relation to the most common regulations in other EU countries Most common in EU Regulations in Romania [1] (% of countries) Allowed BAC2 level: 0,0‰ 0,5‰ (54%) - Novice drivers: 0,0‰ 0,0‰ (43%) - Professional drivers: 0,0‰ 0,2‰ (32%) and 0,0‰ (36%) Phoning: - Hand held: not allowed Not allowed (all countries) - Hands free: allowed Allowed (all countries) Use of restraint systems: Romania has a zero tolerance - Driver: obligatory Obligatory (all countries) for drink-driving. - Front passenger: obligatory Obligatory (all countries) - Rear passengers: obligatory Obligatory (all countries)

- Children: obligatory Obligatory (all countries) Helmet wearing: - Motor riders: Obligatory Obligatory (all countries) - Moped riders: Obligatory Obligatory (all countries) - Cyclists: not obligatory Not obligatory - Daytime running lights are mandatory on motorways, expressways and E-roads. - A demerit point system is in place. [2] Sources: [1] EC DG-Move, 2015; [2] WHO, 2013

Enforcement

Table 8: Effectiveness of enforcement effort in Romania according to an international respondent consensus (scale = 0-10) Score for Most common in EU Issue Romania (% of countries) Speed legislation enforcement 5 7 (43%) Child restraint and speed law Seat-belt law enforcement 7 7 (25%) and 8 (25%) enforcement are below Child restraint law enforcement 7 8 (39%) average in Romania. Helmet legislation enforcement 9 9 (50%)

Drink-driving law enforcement 8 8 (43%) Source: WHO, 2015

Road user education and training

Table 9: Road user education and training in Romania compared to the situation in other EU countries Most common in EU Education and training in Romania (% of countries) General education programmes: - Primary school: provided Compulsory (71%) - Secondary school: provided Compulsory (43%) Road user education in - Other groups: no special groups. - Romania is provided at schools, Driving licences thresholds: but it is not compulsory. - Passenger car: 18 years 18 years (79%) - Motorised two wheeler: 18-21 years 18 years (low categories) and higher ages (32%) - Buses and coaches: 21years 21 years (86%) - Lorries and trucks: 21 years 21 years (75%) Sources: [1] ROSE25, 2005; [2] ETSC; 2011; [3] national sources

2 Blood Alcohol Concentration - 5 - Road Safety Country Overview – Romania

Public Campaigns

Table 10: Public campaigns in Romania compared to the situation in other EU countries Most common issues in EU Campaigns in Romania (% of countries) Organisation: - CISR - CNADNR - The Traffic Police - NGOs Main themes: - speed - fatigue Drink-driving (96%) - children Seat-belt (79%) - drink-driving Speeding (86%) - seat-belts - vulnerable road users (pedestrians- cyclists) Sources: [1] SUPREME, 2005; [2] ETSC, 2011; [3] national sources

Vehicles and technology (national developments)

Table 11: Developments of vehicles and technology in Romania compared to the situation in other EU countries Most common in EU Mandatory technical inspections: (% of countries) No information is available on Passenger cars: no information Every 12 months (39%) the mandatory vehicle Motorcycles: no information Every 24 months (32%) inspection periods in Romania. Buses or coaches: no information Every 12 months (61%) Lorries or trucks: no information Every 12 months (68%) Sources: EC website; national sources

- 6 - Road Safety Country Overview – Romania

Road Safety Performance Indicators

Speed

Table 12: Number of speed tickets per population in Romania versus the EU average Average EU Measure 2007 2011 annual average change (2011) Number of speed tickets/ The number of speed tickets 49 50 1% 108 per population in Romania is 1000 population Sources: [1] ETSC, 2010; [2] ETSC, 2015 lower than the EU average. Table 13: Percentage of speed offenders per road type in Romania compared to the EU average Average Road type 2004 2012 annual EU average change Motorways n/a n/a n/a n/a Rural roads n/a n/a n/a n/a Urban roads n/a n/a n/a n/a Sources: [1] ETSC, 2010; [2] ETSC, 2015

Table 14: Mean speed per road type in Romania compared to the EU average Average Road type 2004 2012 annual EU average change Motorways n/a n/a n/a n/a Rural roads n/a n/a n/a n/a Urban roads n/a n/a n/a n/a Sources: [1] ETSC, 2010; [2] ETSC, 2015

Alcohol

Table 15: Road side surveys for drink-driving in Romania compared to EU average Average EU average Measure 2006 2010 annual (2010) change Amount of tests/1000 There is no information on n/a n/a n/a 154 drink-driving in Romania. population % tested over the limit n/a n/a n/a 2,8% Sources: [1] ETSC, 2010; [2] ETSC, 2015

- 7 - Road Safety Country Overview – Romania

Vehicles

Table 16: State of the vehicle fleet in Romania compared to the EU average Vehicles EU average

The share of cars newer than 2 Cars per age group (2009): Passenger cars (2009) years in Romania is lower than - 3% ≤ 2 years 11% ≤ 2 years the EU average. - 12% 3 to 5 years 18% 3 to 5 years - 31% 6 to 10 years 26% 6 to 10 years

- 53% > 10 years 45% >10 years

EuroNCAP occupant protection score of cars (new cars sold in 2008): - 5 stars: no information 5 stars: 49% - 4 stars: no information 4 stars: 35% - 3 stars: no information 3 stars: 6% - 2 stars: no information 2 stars 1%3 Sources: ETSC, 2009; national sources

Protective systems

Table 17: Protective system use in Romania versus the average in EU Protective systems EU average4 Daytime seat-belt wearing in cars and vans (2014) (2010) [1]: - 49% front 93% front Helmet wearing rate for PTW - 47% driver not available riders is quite high in Romania, - no information on % front passenger not available but seat-belt wearing rates are - no information on % rear 63% rear low. Helmet use (2010) [1]: not available - 89% motor drivers - 76% motor passengers - no information on % cyclists Source: WHO, 2013

3 Based on data of 27 countries (excl. CY, IS and MT). 4 Based on data of 17 EU countries; data of AT, IE, LT, PL, SE, UK (2014); data of DE, FI, HU, PT (2013); data of CZ, DK, EE, ES, FR, LV (2012) - 8 - Road Safety Country Overview – Romania

Road Safety Outcomes

General positioning Romania is the country with the second highest fatality rate among the European countries, roughly 80% higher than the EU average. At 91 killed per million population (2014), no substantial improvement has been achieved between 2001 and 2014. Moreover, the rate peaked to nearly 150 in 2008.

Figure 1: Fatalities per million inhabitants in 2014 with EU average

EU average 120

100

Fatalities per million inhabitants

Romania is the country with 0

HU MT the second highest fatality rate NO among the European countries, Country roughly 80% higher than the Sources: CARE, Eurostat EU average.

Figure 2: Development of fatalities per million inhabitants between 2001 and 2014 for Romania and the EU average

Sources: CARE, Eurostat

- 9 - Road Safety Country Overview – Romania

Transport mode At 38% in 2014, the share of pedestrian fatalities is significantly higher than the EU average. Between 2001 and 2014 the average annual reduction of pedestrian fatalities was only 3%.

Table 18: Reported fatalities by mode of transport in Romania compared to the EU The share of pedestrian average of the last year available Average EU fatalities is significantly higher Share Transport mode 2001 2014 annual average in 2014 than the EU average. change (2014) Pedestrians 1.088 697 -3% 38% 22% Car occupants 933 724 -2% 40% 45% Motorcyclists 9 45 13% 2% 15% Mopeds 4 30 17% 2% 3% Cyclists 145 151 0% 8% 8% Bus/coach 15 9 -4% 0% 1% occupants Lorries or truck 145 84 -4% 5% 5% occupants Sources: CARE, national sources

Age, gender and nationality

Table 19: Reported fatalities by age, gender and nationality in Romania compared to the EU average of the last year available Average EU Share Age and gender 2001 2014 annual average in 2014 change (2014) Females 0 - 14 years 67 37 -4% 2% 1% 15 – 17 years 21 16 -2% 1% 1% 18 – 24 years 75 33 -6% 2% 3% 25 – 49 years 172 101 -4% 6% 6% 50 – 64 years 87 108 2% 6% 4% 65+ years 157 162 0% 9% 9% Males 0 - 14 years 120 54 -6% 3% 1% 15 – 17 years 35 21 -4% 1% 2%

18 – 24 years 236 144 -4% 8% 12% Fatalities among people aged 25 – 49 years 835 523 -4% 29% 29% 50 to 64 years old are over- 50 – 64 years 385 360 -1% 20% 15% represented in Romania. 65+ years 260 258 0% 14% 16% Nationality of driver or rider killed National 2.408 1.787 -2% 98% n/a Non-national 42 31 -2% 2% n/a Sources: CARE, national sources

- 10 - Road Safety Country Overview – Romania

Location Fatalities in built-up areas are substantially over-represented in Romania compared to the EU average.

Table 20: Reported fatalities by location in Romania compared to the EU average of Fatalities in built-up areas are the last year available over-represented in Romania. Average EU Share in Location 2001 2014 annual average 2014 change (2014) Built-up areas 1.841 1.146 -4% 63% 38% Rural areas 603 651 1% 36% 54% Motorways 6 21 10% 1% 7% Junctions 71 175 7% 10% 19% Sources: CARE, national sources

Lighting and weather conditions

Table 21: Reported fatalities by lighting and weather conditions in Romania compared to the EU average of the last year available Average EU Share Conditions 2001 2014 annual average in 2014 change (2014) Lightning conditions During daylight 1.130 1.007 -1% 55% 49% During night-time 1.149 669 -4% 37% 30% Weather conditions While raining 88 225 7% 12% 9% Sources: CARE, national sources

Single vehicle accidents

The share of fatal accidents Table 22: Reported fatalities by type in Romania compared to the EU average of the while raining is higher in last year available Romania than on average in Average EU Share EU. Accident Type 2001 2014 annual average in 2014 change (2014) Single vehicle n/a n/a - - 40% accidents Sources: CARE, national sources

Under-reporting of casualties - Fatalities: 100% (2009), due to improvements of the data recording systems. - Hospitalised: no studies with quantitative information exist.

- 11 - Road Safety Country Overview – Romania

Risk figures

Figure 3: Fatalities by vehicle type in Romania in 2012

In Romania, the fatality risk is extremely high for riders of mopeds and mofas. Sources: CARE, UNECE

Figure 4: Fatalities by million inhabitants in Romania in 2014

Sources: CARE, EUROSTAT

- 12 - Road Safety Country Overview – Romania

Social Cost

- The total cost of road accident casualties (fatalities and injuries) is estimated at 48,5 billion euros (2014). - The following costs are an update of the values in Table 5.3 of the HEATCO Deliverable D5 (2006) to base year 2010. Each figure includes the value of safety per se (VSL5 for fatality, 13% of VSL for severe, 1% for light injury) and the value of direct and indirect economic costs (10% of VSL for fatality, severe and slight injury based on HEATCO (2005)). EU average based on the VSL of €1.7 million. - The costs per casualty for 2010 are as follows:

Estimated costs of road Table 23: Cost (€) per injury type in Romania versus the EU average accident casualties are lower in Romania than on average in Country Fatality Severe injury Slight injury EU. Austria 2.395.000 327.000 25.800 Belgium 2.178.000 330.400 21.300 Bulgaria 984.000 127.900 9.800 Croatia 1.333.000 173.300 13.300 Cyprus 1.234.000 163.100 11.900 Czech Republic 1.446.000 194.300 14.100 Denmark 2.364.000 292.600 22.900 Estonia 1.163.000 155.800 11.200 Finland 2.213.000 294.300 22.000 France 2.070.000 289.200 21.600 Germany 2.220.000 307.100 24.800 Greece 1.518.000 198.400 15.100 Hungary 1.225.000 164.400 11.900 Ireland 2.412.000 305.600 23.300 Italy 1.916.000 246.200 18.800 Latvia 1.034.000 140.000 10.000 Lithuania 1.061.000 144.900 10.500 Luxembourg 3.323.000 517.700 31.200 Malta 2.122.000 269.500 20.100 Netherlands 2.388.000 316.400 25.500 Poland 1.168.000 156.700 11.300 Portugal 1.505.000 201.100 13.800 Romania 1.048.000 136.200 10.400 Slovakia 1.593.000 219.700 15.700 Slovenia 1.989.000 258.300 18.900 Spain 1.913.000 237.800 17.900 Sweden 2.240.000 328.700 23.500 Great Britain 2.170.000 280.300 22.200 EU average 1.870.000 243.100 18.700 Source: Update of the Handbook on External Costs of Transport. Final Report. Report for the European Commission: DG MOVE. Ricardo-AEA/R/ ED57769 Issue Number 1; 8th January 2014

5 Value of Statistical Life - 13 - Road Safety Country Overview – Romania

Synthesis

Safety position - Romania is the country with the second highest fatality rate among the European countries, roughly 80% higher than the EU average.

Scope of problem - The highest shares of road fatalities in Romania are among the car occupants and the pedestrians. Pedestrians are significantly over- represented compared to the EU average. Motorcycle and pedestrian - Moped and motorcycle fatalities have significantly increased between safety are major issues in 2001 and 2014, and the risk of those groups is extremely high. Romania. - Fatalities among people aged 50 to 64 years are over-represented in Romania. More or less especially the elderly have the highest risk to die as a result of a road crash in Romania. - Much more fatalities in Romania occur inside built-up areas. - The share of fatal accidents while raining is higher in Romania than on average in EU. - Seat-belt wearing rates are low in Romania.

Recent progress - At 91 killed per million population (2014), no substantial improvement has been achieved between 2001 and 2014 in Romania. Moreover, the rate peaked to nearly 150 in 2008.

Remarkable road safety policy issues - The national road safety plan of Romania has not yet been approved. - Romania has already implemented road safety audits and inspections. - Romania has a zero tolerance for drink-driving. - Child restraint and speed law enforcement are below average in Romania.

- 14 - Road Safety Country Overview – Romania

References

1. CARE database (2015). 2. CIA database (2015). 3. DG-TREN (2010). Technical Assistance in support of the Preparation of the European Road Safety Action Program 2011-2020. Final Report. DG- TREN, Brussels. 4. European Commission website (2015). http://europa.eu/youreurope/citizens/vehicles/registration/formalities/in dex_en.htm 5. European Commission DG Move website (2015). http://ec.europa.eu/transport/road_safety/index_en.htm 6. ETSC (2009). Boost the market for safer cars across Europe. + Background tables PIN Flash no. 13. ETSC, Brussels. 7. ETSC (2010). Road Safety Target in Sight: Making up for lost time. + Background tables 4th Road Safety PIN report. ETSC, Brussels. 8. ETSC (2014). Ranking EU progress on car occupant safety. + Background tables PIN Flash no. 27. ETSC, Brussels. 9. ETSC (2015). Enforcement in the EU-Vision 2020. + Background tables. ETSC, Brussels. 10. ETSC (2015). Making walking and cycling on Europe's roads safer. + Background tables PIN Flash no. 29. ETSC, Brussels. 11. ETSC (2015). Ranking EU progress on improving motorway safety. + Background tables PIN Flash no. 28. ETSC, Brussels. 12. Eurostat database (2015). 13. European Commission (2014). Handbook on External Costs of Transport. Final Report. Ricardo-AEA/R/ ED57769 Issue Number 1; 8th January 2014. 14. European Commission (2015). Road Safety in the European Union: Trends, statistics and main challenges. European Commission, Mobility and Transport DG, Brussels. 15. National Sources (2015): via national CARE experts and official national sources of statistics. 16. OECD/ITF (2014). Road Safety Annual Report 2014. OECD Publishing, Paris. 17. OECD/ITF (2015). Road Safety Annual Report 2015. OECD Publishing, Paris. 18. OECD/ITF (2015). Road Infrastructure Safety Management. OECD Publishing, Paris. 19. ROSE25 (2005). Inventory and compiling of a European good practice guide on road safety education targeted at young people. Final report. KfV, Vienna. 20. SARTRE (2010). European road users' risk perception and mobility. SARTRE 4 survey. 21. SUPREME (2007) Final Report Part F1. Thematic Report: Education and Campaigns. European Commission, Brussels. 22. WHO (2013). Global status report on road safety 2013: supporting a decade of action. World Health Organisation, Geneva. 23. WHO (2015) Global status report on road safety 2015. World Health Organisation, Geneva. 24. UNECE database (2015).

- 15 - Road Safety Country Overview – Romania

Notes

1. Country abbreviations

Belgium BE Italy IT Romania RO Bulgaria BG Cyprus CY Slovenia SI Czech Republic CZ Latvia LV Slovakia SK Denmark DK Lithuania LT Finland FI Germany DE Luxembourg LU Sweden SE Estonia EE Hungary HU United Kingdom UK Ireland IE Malta MT Greece EL Netherlands NL Iceland IS Spain ES Austria AT Liechtenstein LI France FR Poland PL Norway NO Croatia HR Portugal PT Switzerland CH

2. Sources: CARE (Community database on road accidents), EUROSTAT, ITF-IRTAD, National sources. The full glossary of definitions of variables used in this Report is available at: http://ec.europa.eu/transport/road_safety/pdf/statistics/cadas_glossary.pdf

3. Data available in September 2015.

4. Average annual change is calculated as follows: a) when data for all years are available, then the average annual change is calculated as the arithmetic mean of all annual changes, b) when data for all years are not available, then the average annual change is calculated with the power function between the first and last years [aac = (b/a)1/n-1, where aac: annual average change, a: first year value, b: last year value, n: number of years].

5. Explanation of symbols in Tables: n/a: not available "-": not applicable (e.g. calculation cannot be performed)

6. This 2015 edition of Road Safety Country Overviews updates the previous version produced in 2012 within the EU co-funded research project DaCoTA.

7. Disclaimer This report has been produced by the National Technical University of Athens (NTUA), the Austrian Road Safety Board (KFV) and the European Union Road Federation (ERF) under a contract with the European Commission. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure that the information presented in this report is relevant, accurate and up-to- date, the Partners cannot accept any liability for any error or omission, or reliance on part or all of the content in another context. Any information and views set out in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the Commission. The Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this study. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for the use that may be made of the information contained therein.

8. Please refer to this Report as follows: European Commission, Road Safety Country Overview – Romania, European Commission, Directorate General for Transport, October 2015.

- 16 - Road Safety Country Overview – Romania

- 17 -