DOCSLIB.ORG

Human Rights Defenders on the Frontlines of Freedom

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Human Rights Defenders on the Frontlines of Freedom SPECIAL CONFERENCE SERIES H UMAN R IGHTS HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDERS D EFENDERS ON THE ON THE FRONTLINES OF FREEDOM PROTECTING HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE WAR ON TERROR F RO NTLINES OF F REEDOM ONE COPENHILL 453 FREEDOM PARKWAY ATLANTA, GA 30307 (404) 420-5100 ◆ FAX (404) 420-5145 WWW.CARTERCENTER.ORG Waging Peace. Fighting Disease. Building Hope. THE CARTER CENTER STRIVES TO RELIEVE SUFFERING BY ADVANCING PEACE AND HEALTH WORLDWIDE; IT SEEKS TO PREVENT AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS, ENHANCE FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY, AND PROTECT AND PROMOTE HUMAN RIGHTS WORLDWIDE. HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDERS ON THE FRONTLINES OF FREEDOM Protecting Human Rights in the Context of the War on Terror CONFERENCE REPORT November 11-12, 2003 The Carter Center Atlanta ONE COPENHILL 453 FREEDOM PARKWAY ATLANTA, GA 30307 (404) 420-5171 FAX (404) 420-5196 WWW.CARTERCENTER.ORG MAY 2004 THE CARTER CENTER HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDERS ON THE FRONTLINES OF FREEDOM TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface by Jimmy Carter...............................................................................3 Executive Summary ....................................................................................6 Feature Presentations .................................................................................18 Welcome by Jimmy Carter .......................................................................18 Mr. Bertrand Ramcharan, United Nations Acting High Commissioner for Human Rights .....18 Ms. Hina Jilani, United Nations Special Representative of the Secretary-General on Human Rights Defenders .....................................................................22 Dr. Saad Eddin Ibrahim..........................................................................27 Dr. Willy Mutunga ...............................................................................30 Participant Testimonies...............................................................................36 Acknowledgments ....................................................................................87 Appendices ............................................................................................89 A. United Nations Declaration on Human Rights Defenders ...................................89 B. The Atlanta Declaration ......................................................................93 C. Participant Biographies .......................................................................96 D. Press Statements and Clippings..............................................................101 Dedication ...........................................................................................107 The Carter Center at a Glance ....................................................................108 Photos by Annemarie Poyo except where noted Visit the conference page on the Carter Center Web site for all conference documents: http://www.cartercenter.org/peaceprograms/showstaticdoc.asp?programID=13&docname= hrconference&submenu=peaceprograms 2 THE CARTER CENTER HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDERS ON THE FRONTLINES OF FREEDOM Preface PREFACE BY JIMMY CARTER n November 2003, we at The Carter Center Many of them have either spent time in prison or had the honor to bring together leading been the subject of harassment as a result of their Iactivists of the human rights and democracy work in holding their governments accountable to movements from 41 different countries. Before his international standards of human rights and the tragic death in Baghdad, the late United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Sergio Vieira de Mello and I had decided to con- vene this gathering because we consid- ered it to be very important to assess new challenges facing those on the front- line of the struggle for freedom. Human rights organizations such as Amnesty International, the Lawyers Committee for Human Rights President Carter and Bertrand Ramcharan co-chaired (now Human Rights First), and Human Rights the Human Rights Defenders conference. Watch had issued some disturbing reports con- cerning difficulties facing human rights defenders throughout the world as a result of the U.S.-led What we learned during our discussions both war on terror. We agreed that it would be impor- surprised and disturbed us. It is important to tant to bring together activists from the national realize that these are especially courageous level in order to hear directly from them. and effective activists who take great risks What we learned during our discussions both surprised and disturbed us. In weighing the views under difficult conditions to protect and expressed by participants, it is important to realize advocate the rights of others. Many of them that these are especially courageous and effective have either spent time in prison or been the activists who take great risks under difficult condi- subject of harassment as a result of their work. tions to protect and advocate the rights of others. 3 THE CARTER CENTER HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDERS ON THE FRONTLINES OF FREEDOM principles of democracy. They are committed to well-developed, making the adoption of these laws Preface the nonviolent struggle for freedom, and it is vital doubly disturbing, especially after so many have sac- to all of us that they succeed in their efforts. rificed in these countries to struggle for democracy. These representatives from all regions of the The participants were in broad agreement that world told of a general retreat by governments recent actions by the United States, traditionally a from previous human rights commitments and a great champion of human rights, were being real danger of setting back democratic movements manipulated and abused by opportunistic govern- by decades in some countries. Participants ments to serve their own interests. Specifically, the explained that dictators have been emboldened to indiscriminate roundup in the United States of violate the human rights of their peoples under men from Middle Eastern countries after 9/11 the guise of joining the fight against terrorism and and the indefinite detention of soldiers and civil- that the same reason is used to deflect criticism ians at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, of people from other powers regarding their human rights captured in Afghanistan have been cited by gov- violations. We learned that in emerging and even ernments as a sign that human rights standards established democracies, hard-won human rights have been lowered and that no one, especially the principles are being eroded on these same United States, has the right to criticize their poli- grounds of emulating new U.S. policies. The con- cies. Though conference participants agreed that sequence is that many lawyers, professors, doctors, the United States does not bear all the responsibil- and journalists have been labeled as terrorists, ity for the abusive actions of other governments, often for merely criticizing a particular policy or there was consensus that the work of promoting carrying out their daily work. In India, for example, democracy and human rights has been set back advocates distributing leaflets with information significantly in this new environment. Participants about the rights of persons under arrest were asserted that the United States and other powerful incarcerated and charged with sedition. We heard democracies will become even less effective as about many cases involving human rights lawyers leaders on human rights and rule of law issues if being charged with abetting terrorists simply for there is no modification of current policies. defending an accused person. Also instructive was the observation from Perhaps most disturbing were the reports that those who came from Northern Ireland, Turkey, indicate that the United States is in some cases Colombia, Israel, the occupied Palestinian territo- contributing directly to an erosion of human ries, and other conflict-ridden societies that rights protection by pushing governments to adopt military approaches to the divisions within their regressive counterterrorism laws that lead to the countries did not create greater security and stabil- undermining of democratic principles and the ity in the medium and long term. They reflected rule of law. The Patriot Act has generated consid- on the lesson that a policy based on violence erable controversy within the United States, always results in escalation of violence and that including Congress and the federal courts, which peaceful political and societal approaches are nec- may roll back some aspects of the law that are essary to make progress toward the resolution of inconsistent with civil rights principles. In young differences. This is an important message for democracies, such checks and balances are not so Americans as we consider whether a military 4 THE CARTER CENTER HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDERS ON THE FRONTLINES OF FREEDOM Preface The leaders of the United States and Britain The participants were in broad agreement have taken the world into a war in Iraq that they that recent actions by the United States, say is necessary to promote freedom and democracy traditionally a great champion of human in the Middle East, and they claim that this effort will help spread freedom throughout the region. rights, were being manipulated and abused It is difficult to reconcile this idea with the reali- by opportunistic governments to serve their ties presented to us by the world’s foremost experts own interests. There was consensus that the on democracy and freedom — those who are on work of promoting democracy and human the frontlines of this movement throughout the rights
Load more

Recommended publications
  • UN75 Global Governance Forum DRAFT Agenda
    UN75 Global Governance Forum 16-17 September (with community-driven sessions on 18 September) DRAFT Agenda *All times are listed in Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) (New York) **Please check the forum website for regular updates of the agenda ***Translation will be provided for the languages listed as follows: Arabic, Bengali, Chinese (Simplified & Traditional), Dutch, French, German, Hindi, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Polish, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish, Tamil and Vietnamese. Day 1 – Wednesday, 16 September Opening Plenary – 9:00am - 10:30am Livestream Link: https://livestream.com/accounts/22723452/UN75GGForumSept16 Translation Link: https://attend.wordly.ai/join/REUF-0065 Video Welcome Remarks by Maryam Nemazee, Al Jazeera Newshour Anchor, Opening Plenary Moderator Opening Comments on “Where We’ve Been, What We Hope to Accomplish” by Maureen Connolly, Forum Director Statement of Appreciation by H.E. Volkan Bozkir, President of the General Assembly, UNGA 75th Session Preceded by a brief presentation by Cristina Petcu, Research Associate, The Stimson Center, of the Roadmap for the Future We Want & UN We Need: A Vision 20/20 for UN75 & Beyond Opening Panel on The Future We Want, The United Nations We Need Speakers: Ban Ki-Moon, Eighth UN Secretary-General, Deputy Chair of The Elders, and President & Chair, Global Green Growth Institute Aya Chebbi, African Union Envoy on Youth Tijjani Muhammad-Bande, out-going President of the General Assembly and Permanent Representative of Nigeria to the United Nations (tbc) Gro Harlem Brundtland, Co-Chair,
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Anti-Semitism: an Urgent Challenge
    Contemporary Anti-Semitism: An Urgent Challenge MARY ROBINSON Director Ethical Globalization Initiative An Interview with Priya Bindra, Jesse Finkelstein, and Julia Kay; and an Abridged Transcript Brown University, 8 November 2004 The Honorable Mary Robinson was the first female President of Ireland, serving from 1990 to 1997, and the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, from 1997 to 2002. She is currently Director ofthe Ethical Globalization Initiative, which aims to foster more equitable international trade and development, strengthen responses to HIV/AIDS in Africa, and shape more humane miration policies. Brown Journal of World Affairs: You are speaking today about contemporary anti- Semitism in Europe. Do you think this is a global phenomenon, or is it solely a Euro- pean problem? Mary Robinson: I think it a global phenomenon. It just happens to be particularly virulent in Europe, and I have been conscious of that for a number of years. This is not the first time I am speaking about this; as Commissioner, I wrote to the foreign minis- tries of a number of European governments in 2002 asking them to take more active steps. It was of course the Nazi period in Europe that was one ofthe darkest moments of anti-Semitism, and was what led to global recognition ofthe problem. It prompted the recognition that the world needed a United Nations Charter, and I recall that the Jewish community here in the United States played a very significant role in the draft- Copyrigbt © 2005 by the Brown Journal of World Affairs WINTER/SPRING 2005 • VOLUME XI, ISSUE 2 MARY ROBINSON ing of that charter.
    [Show full text]
  • Opening Adress of Bertrand Ramcharan, Acting United Nations
    Opening Adress of Bertrand Ramcharan, Acting United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights At a Conference organized by the International Commission of Jurists Geneva, 23 October, 2003 The subject we have come here today to discuss is indeed an important and topical one: human rights, counter-terrorism, and international monitoring systems. I am pleased to be with you on this occasion and greet you warmly on behalf of all my colleagues in the Office of High Commissioner for Human Rights. Having been a Commissioner of the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) before becoming a United Nations human rights Commissioner, you will understand my pleasure and gratitude, that this conference is being organized by the ICJ, with whom we have had a long and fruitful partnership for human rights going back for years. Some years ago, the ICJ did an important study on human rights and states of emergency and, more recently, it has done an important study on human rights and terrorism. The ICJ has thus made foundation contributions to the topics of interest to us today for which we are all grateful. I should like, in these opening remarks, to take each of the topics of our conference in turn: human rights, counter-terrorism, and international monitoring systems. First, human rights. What are the considerations that should be in our minds today as we commence this conference? It would be important, I believe, to remind ourselves of the international code of human rights that all Governments are pledged to live by. Can one say that the basic norms of international human rights law are in fact influencing all countries and that they are seeking in good faith to implement those norms? Many countries are indeed striving, in sometimes difficult circumstances, to follow the human rights path.
    [Show full text]
  • Retrospective
    Theodore Ruger, Dean and Bernard G. Segal Professor of Law, University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School Penn Law builds bridges with leading international organizations, legal institutions, world leaders, and policymakers that deepen our engagement with pressing global issues. At a time of great geopolitical upheavals, Penn Law's engagement with transnational leaders has helped strengthen our students’ shared commitments to multilateralism, strong international institutions, and diversity in leadership. In an age of intense inquiry of equal representation of gender and race in global decision- making, these portraits and perspectives showcase a few of the global voices that have influenced Penn Law's inclusive vision of global justice. Rangita de Silva de Alwis, Associate Dean of International Affairs, University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School ___ "In the course of history, there comes a time when humanity is called upon to shift to a new level of consciousness to reach a higher moral ground — that is where we are now." -Mary Robinson, President of Ireland; Penn Law Commencement Speaker 2017 “The number of women who have come forward as a result of the #MeToo movement has been astonishing. My hope is not just that it is here to stay, but that it is as effective for the woman who works as a maid in a hotel as it is for Hollywood stars." -Justice Ginsburg at Penn Law Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court; Penn Law Roberts Lecture, 2018 "Let it be said that human rights are women's rights, and women's rights are human
    [Show full text]
  • United States of America
    United Nations A/HRC/16/11 General Assembly Distr.: General 4 January 2011 Original: English Human Rights Council Sixteenth session Agenda item 6 Universal Periodic Review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review* United States of America * Previously issued as document A/HRC/WG.6/9/L.9. The annex to the present report is circulated as received. GE.11-10069 A/HRC/16/11 Contents Paragraphs Page Introduction............................................................................................................. 1–4 3 I. Summary of the proceedings of the review process................................................ 5–91 3 A. Presentation by the State under review........................................................... 6–7 3 B. Interactive dialogue and responses by the State under review........................ 8–91 4 II. Conclusions and/or recommendations..................................................................... 92–94 13 Annex Composition of the delegation ......................................................................................................... 29 2 A/HRC/16/11 Introduction 1. The Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review (UPR), established in accordance with Human Rights Council resolution 5/1, held its ninth session from 1 to 12 November 2010. The review of the United States of America was held at the 9th meeting, on 5 November 2010. The delegation of the United States of America was headed jointly by the Honourable Esther Brimmer, Assistant Secretary, Bureau of International
    [Show full text]
  • Reforming Myanmar's Military
    Reforming Myanmar’s Military BY ERIN MURPHY, MATTHEW TURPIN, AND PETER KUCIK he developing relationship between the U.S. and Myanmar represents one of the most positive foreign policy shifts in recent memory. Myanmar is one of few former despotic T nations to have “unclenched its fist” and now enjoys generally positive international sup- port. With the U.S. actively engaged in civil capacity building efforts, the people of Myanmar are testing their new freedom of speech to debate nearly all facets of their public and private sectors. The path to democratic and economic reform, begun in 2011, will likely be rocky, but the positive momentum is clear. There is however one glaring omission in U.S. efforts to help Myanmar: assistance in reform- ing its military institutions. Critics of comprehensive military assistance suggest that conducting military-to-military engagement offers something for nothing, as the Myanmar military has shown few signs of reform. With ongoing human rights abuses, the U.S. should not provide any benefits to Myanmar’s military through enhanced ties. Additionally, some critics believe that U.S. military assistance will simply result in making Myanmar’s military better at abusing the civilian popula- tion and will give them the tools to undermine democratic and economic reforms. While these are legitimate concerns, direct military-to-military engagement with Myanmar is a critical part of the overall reform effort. Ignoring this crucial segment of Myanmar’s society risks undermining the long-term stability and development of the country. As the military is Myanmar’s most powerful institution, the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Dear Friends
    Dear Friends, Greetings from the Project on Middle East Democracy! Last week, Syrian violence and repression continued as Secretary Clinton announced President Assad had lost his legitimacy. Secretary Clinton also announced U.S. recognition of the Transitional National Council in Libya. Analysts debated the legitimacy of the National Dialogue in Bahrain amidst continued government repression. Meanwhile, popular frustration continues to mount in Egypt at the slow pace of reform. Look for next week to be dominated by increased international pressure on President Assad in Syria, as well as working toward a negotiated settlement in Libya. For more detailed coverage of the debates surrounding U.S. foreign policy and the prospects for democracy in the Middle East, be sure to check out our blog, the POMED Wire. Also, POMED's Weekly Wire is now available in Arabic - to register to receive the Arabic version by email, please click here. The Weekly Wire July 18, 2011 Legislation No relevant legislation was discussed this week. Committee Hearings The Subcommittee on the Middle East and South Asia held the first of two hearings on “Promoting Peace? Re-examining U.S. Aid to the Palestinian Authority.” The hearing was presided over by Chairman Steve Chabot (R-OH), and ranking member Gary Ackerman (D- NY). The witnesses were Jacob Walles, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State, Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs; Lieutenant General Michael Moeller; and George A. Laudato, USAID Administrator’s Special Assistant for the Middle East. The U.S. House of Representatives Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission held a hearing on human rights in Syria.
    [Show full text]
  • Kofi Annan Anuncia a Dos Nuevos Elders: Hina Jilani Y Ernesto Zedillo
    Kofi Annan anuncia a dos nuevos Elders: Hina Jilani y Ernesto Zedillo Hina Jilani y Ernesto Zedillo (Crédito: Jeff Moore/The Elders; Harold Shapiro) 11 de julio de 2013 PARA PUBLICACIÓN INMEDIATA Hina Jilani, defensora de los derechos humanos reconocida internacionalmente, originaria de Pakistán, y Ernesto Zedillo, ex-Presidente de México, han pasado a formar parte de The Elders, un grupo de líderes independientes que trabajan en pro de la paz, la justicia y los derechos humanos. Su nombramiento fue anunciado el día de hoy por Kofi Annan, Presidente del grupo que fue convocado por primera vez por Nelson Mandela en 2007. Kofi Annan, ex-Secretario de la ONU y Presidente de The Elders, dijo: "Estoy muy contento de que Hina Jilani y Ernesto Zedillo hayan aceptado unirse a nuestro grupo. Su sabiduría y experiencia serán bienes preciados para nuestra labor futura. Sus carreras son modelos de liderazgo ético y firme compromiso con los valores democráticos. Estoy convencido de que nos ayudarán a inspirarnos y promover estos principios y nos acercarán a nuestro objetivo de superar los desafíos prioritarios de The Elders: combatir las causas fundamentales del conflicto y construir un mundo más justo e inclusivo". Hina Jilani es abogada de la Corte Suprema de Pakistán. En dicha capacidad ha llevado muchos casos históricos, estableciendo nuevas normas en Pakistán en materia de derechos de la mujer, de minorías, la infancia y prisioneros - incluyendo prisioneros políticos. Ella fundó el primer bufete de abogados integrado en su totalidad por mujeres en Pakistán, y fue co-fundadora del primer centro de asistencia jurídica.
    [Show full text]
  • Hina Jilani Pioneering Lawyer and Pro-Democracy Campaigner; a Leading Activist in Pakistan's Women's Movement and International Champion of Human Rights
    Hina Jilani Pioneering lawyer and pro-democracy campaigner; a leading activist in Pakistan's women's movement and international champion of human rights. ● Founded Pakistan’s first all-women law firm, 1980 ● Co-founder of Pakistan’s National Human Rights Commission, 1986 ● Appointed advocate of the Supreme Court of Pakistan, 1992 ● UN Special Representative on Human Rights Defenders, 2000-2008 ● Awarded the Millennium Peace Prize for Women, 2001 ● Joined The Elders, 2013 ● Appointed Co-chair of the Taskforce on Justice, 2018 “I always had this feeling that if you see injustice, you have to speak out against it; otherwise you are not in a position to complain.” Work with The Elders Hina Jilani has been a member of The Elders since 2013. Together with The Elders she has travelled to Myanmar, France, Thailand, Argentina, South Africa, Saudi Arabia, and several visits to the US and the UN in New York. She har participated in world conferences – from the Munich Security Conference in 2017 to the Women Deliver Conference in Denmark in 2016 – and has spoken at numerous high-level events about ensuring access to justice, achieving gender equality and the importance of civil society as well as the need for an effective multilateral institutional framework that respects human rights. Hina Jilani is especially passionate about women and girls’ rights and women’s role in justice and peace-making, defending human rights defenders and the fair treatment and protection of refugees. Pioneering lawyer and activist A renowned lawyer and civil society activist, Hina Jilani has dedicated her life to fighting for human rights and democracy in Pakistan and around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Rule of Law Commodity Derivatives
    The rule of law Robert A Stein University of Minnesota Law School The essence of the rule of law, as originally attributed to Aristotle, is a “government by laws and not by men”.1 Scholars, judges and organisations in various countries, particularly in recent years, have laboured to define in greater detail the meaning of this concept.2 There is wide agreement that the concept is difficult to define in a way that captures all of its significant meaning.3 US Supreme Court Justice Anthony M Kennedy has observed: “The term Rule of Law is often invoked yet seldom defined.”4 A good starting point in examining the concept is the definition of the rule of law set forth in the 2004 Report of the Secretary General of the United Nations, entitled The Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies: [The rule of law] refers to a principle of governance in which all persons, institutions and entities, public and private, including the State itself, are accountable to laws that publicly promulgated, equally enforced and independently adjudicated, and which are consistent with international human rights norms and standards. It requires, as well, measures to ensure adherence to the principles of supremacy of law, equality before the law, accountability to the law, fairness in the application of the law, separation of powers, participation in decision-making, legal certainty, avoidance of arbitrariness and procedural legal transparency.5 The principles constituting the rule of law identified in this definition are both procedural and substantive. The rule of law principles are procedural, for example, in that the laws must be the supreme law of the land, publicly promulgated, equally enforced, and adjudicated by an independent judiciary.
    [Show full text]
  • Geneva, June 16Th, 2003 Bertrand Ramcharan Deputy High
    Geneva, June 16th, 2003 Bertrand Ramcharan Deputy High Commissioner for Human Rights United Nations Geneva, Switzerland RE: Human Rights and the World Summit on the Information Society Your Excellency Mr. Bertrand Ramcharan, The under-signed civil society organizations strongly encourage your active participation in the preparatory committee and summit meeting of the World Summit on the Information Society, taking place in September and December 2003, respectively. Human rights are an essential requirement of the Information Society, as elaborated in the draft declaration of the WSIS (WSIS/PCIP/DT/1-E): 10. The essential requirements for the development of an equitable Information Society include: The respect for all internationally recognized human rights and fundamental freedoms. Notably the right to freedom of opinion and expression, including the right to hold opinions without interference and seek to, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers in accordance with article 19 of the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights and to unhindered access by individuals to communication media and information sources… As the United Nations highest human rights official, your good offices are needed to ensure that human rights language in the WSIS process is comprehensive, strong and consistent with resolutions and decisions adopted by the Commission on Human Rights and build upon human rights language developed through the various UN world summits and conferences. Civil society organizations view ICTs as having both tremendous applications that enhance human rights, such as through the rapid dissemination of action alerts and instant access to human rights information, and disturbing capacities to greatly diminish human rights, such as by providing governments with means enabling intrusive surveillance and monitoring and therefore, repression.
    [Show full text]
  • APWLD Herstory 1986-2017 APWLD HERSTORY
    APWLD Herstory 1986-2017 APWLD HERSTORY Published by Asia Pacific Forum on Women, Law and Development (APWLD) 1986-2017 2019 Chiang Mai, Thailand Celebrating over 30 years of advocacy, activism and movement ISBN: 978-616-92225-4-5 building to advance women’s human rights in the Asia Pacific Region Asia Pacific Forum on Women, Law and Development 4 5 Writers and editors: Judy M. Taguiwalo and Trimita Chakma Contributors: Sanam Amin, Ya Gan, Marion Cabrera and Prisana Booth Layout designer: Aileen Familara Photos: Margaret Schuler’s website, The Story of Women, Law and Development (https://www.wld-history.net) and APWLD archive. Foreword from APWLD Regional Coordinator Notes from the Editors As I read through the publication, I could not stop picturing the very first Judy Taguiwalo APWLD Member and consultant meeting of our founding members. I felt like I could feel their breath, hear their voices and see their facial expressions as they critically understand, analyse and envision a new feminist future for women in Asia Pacific, and APWLD’s Herstory was initially about documenting the stories collectively chart out feminist strategies to realise that vision. It is very of the organisation’s founding members in time for its 30th clear that APWLD was founded based on the firm feminist principles and anniversary in 2016. But it took almost five years for the project the trust in the power of grassroots, people’s movements and solidarity. I to be completed and the story has expanded beyond the stories of have never realised how radical APWLD’s founding commitment to use the founding mothers.
    [Show full text]