When the French Army Invaded Germany in 1939 to Support Poland, All Did Not Go As Planned

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

When the French Army Invaded Germany in 1939 to Support Poland, All Did Not Go As Planned War History Online When The French Army Invaded Germany in 1939 To Support Poland, All Did Not Go As Planned Feb 17, 2018 Andrew Knighton French soldier at the German village of Lauterbach in Saarland. Hohum - CC BY-SA 3.0 Germany was not the first country to go on the offensive on the western front of World War Two. That first attack came from France, which launched a brief and ineffective invasion of Germany in September 1939. This 1 That first attack came from France, which launched a brief and ineffective invasion of Germany in September 1939. This attack, intended to help the far-away Poles, became an embarrassing defeat and a harbinger of what would follow when Germany invaded France. The Aim of Operation Saar Following the First World War, both France and Poland had reasons to fear future German military aggression. Since Prussia united the fractured German states under its leadership in the 1860s, German leaders had used military action against their neighbors to the east and west both as routes to territorial aggrandizement and a way to keep Germany united. Germany was a nation with a reputation for belligerence, whose troops had marched through both countries in the First World War. To counter this German belligerence, the French and the Polish governments agreed to a military treaty in 1921, binding them to support each other in any war against Germany. It was on the back of this treaty that, two days after the German invasion of Poland on 1 September 1939, France declared war on Germany. At the time, the declaration of war was a largely symbolic act. Like Britain, which had declared war on the same day, France was too far from Poland to offer real aid in driving back the invaders. But one possibility offered itself. An invasion of western Germany by French troops might draw soldiers away from the attack on Poland. Failing that, it would at least give France a head start in the war that must inevitably come her way. 2 The Saar Offensive French soldier at the German village of Lauterbach in Saarland. Hohum – CC BY-SA 3.0 What followed was Operation Saar, an invasion of the German region of Saarland. Unfortunately for the French, the restrictions that bound them to this plan would also ensure its failure. The French did not want to violate the neutrality of Belgium by taking armed forces across its territory. As a result, they could only attack Germany along a limited front. This front had been defined 125 years earlier, during the peace process following the Napoleonic wars, when the rest of Europe was concerned with containing French aggression. It gave the Germans the advantage of the defensive high ground. 3 German artillery on Siegfried Line. Bundesarchiv- CC-BY-SA 3.0 de. Still, the French had made a promise to Poland, and they lived up to it. On 7 September they invaded Saarland with a limited force, which was due to be followed by a full-scale invasion a few weeks later. Forty divisions were sent in, with 4,700 artillery and 2,400 tanks. Facing them were 22 divisions and less than 100 artillery pieces of the German 1st Army. 4 The Advance Stalls September 1939: french R-35 tanks (5th BCC) in the Warndt forest, during the short-lived offensive in the Sarre. The French advanced five miles into Germany, taking a few towns and villages. The Germans had evacuated this territory, pulling back to the prepared defenses of the Siegfried Line. They left behind minefields and booby-trapped houses to slow down and damage the advancing French. The French came unprepared, lacking mine detectors. Part of the problem was the French mobilization plan. They had been expecting to face an attack by Germany and were prepared for this. But despite their commitment to the Poles, they lacked an adequate plan for taking the war to Germany. 5 Maurice Gamelin, French Commander in Chief in 1939. What plans the French did have were outdated, relying on the strategies of the First World War, the slow and bloody advance of trench warfare and protracted bombardments. But as the Germans were showing in the east, this was a new age of warfare. Victory now relied on fast advances and swiftly flowing forces, using hard-hitting, swift-moving tanks and transport vehicles that had not existed during the First World War. Even for the plans they had in mind, the French mobilization system was outdated. They lacked the ability and the will to swiftly mobilize a large army and put it to effective use. The first steps towards mobilization had only started on 26 August, and full mobilization on 1 September, following the German invasion of Poland. As the French army dragged itself into action, its advancing formations came within artillery range of the Siegfried Line. Here they discovered the effectiveness of the German defenses and the ineffectiveness of the guns they had brought. 6 To fire on the Siegfried Line they had to bring their artillery within range the answering German firepower. The French had far more guns, and their bombardment fell both accurately and rapidly on the German positions, but the guns could not penetrate those defenses. Some fired 155mm shells, not heavy enough to make a real impression on the concrete bunkers. Those firing 220mm and 280mm shells might have done better, but their ammunition did not have delayed fuses, and so exploded on impact rather than penetrating the outer casements first. Explosives were hurled against the German line to little effect. Withdrawal 9th of September 1939: French soldiers of the 42nd infantry division in the German village of Lauterbach. On 12 September, the British and French met. They already believed that Poland was a lost cause, and so decided to halt all operations while a long-term plan was developed. Advancing troops stopped short of assaulting the Siegfried Line. The Poles, who had not been consulted on the decision, were told that the full assault on the western front was to be delayed until 20 September. On 17 September, the invasion of Poland by Russian forces ended any small hope that remained for the Poles. French forces withdrew from Saarland, leaving only a small holding force. The full assault was canceled. 7 With Poland defeated, German troops were sent west, and on 16 October they launched a counter-offensive in Saarland. As planned, the French troops withdrew, leaving the Germans to retake the captured territory. The French pulled back to defensive positions along the ill-fated Maginot Line. Little blood had been split over Saarland to distract the Germans. Even less effort had been expended. The French had shown that they were not prepared for an offensive war, and settled into a defensive position that they would also soon lose. ______________________________________ The Maginot Line – 11 Fascinating Facts About France’s Great Wall by MilitaryHistoryNow.com • 7 May, 2017 • 3 Comments FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditPinterestStumbleUponLinkedInEmailPrintFriendly 2 “Build a wall!” was more than just a 2016 presidential campaign slogan. It was in effect France’s military strategy for the years between the two World Wars. 8 “The Maginot Line has come to symbolize everything wrong with the Allied strategy in the years leading up to the Second World War… But was it really the disaster many have suggested?” WORLD WAR ONE shattered France. German troops invaded the country within weeks of the opening of hostilities in 1914. For the next four years, the enemy occupied roughly 8,000 square miles of French territory — an area roughly the size of Massachusetts and one that contained a quarter of the country’s steel manufacturing capacity, 40 per cent of its coal reserves and a whopping 64 per cent of pig iron production. Eight million citizens were mobilized to drive the Germans from France; an estimated 52 percent of them became casualties. In fact, fully five percent of the country’s total population perished in the war. Many of the conflicts’s deadliest battles, like the Somme, Verdun and Germany’s 1918 Spring Offensive were fought on French soil. Following the Armistice, France was determined to be ready for future wars. As the Weimar Republic began to rearm Germany in the late 1920s — a policy that later only accelerated under the Nazis — the French government set to work constructing an enormous defensive barrier along its eastern border to deter invasion. It was to be called the Maginot Line. A map of the Maginot Line. (Image source: WikiCommons) 9 Named for André Maginot, the French war minister who during the 1920s pressed the government to allocate money to border defences, this 280-mile long network of concrete bunkers, pill boxes and underground casemates certainly appeared formidable upon its completion. But it would turn out that France’s fixed defences, menacing as they were, would be famously outflanked by Germany’s Panzer divisions in 1940, who attacked France by way of neutral Belgium. Since then, the Maginot Line has come to symbolize everything wrong with the Allied strategy in the years leading up to the Second World War. But were France’s defences really the disaster many have suggested? Here are 10 facts about one of military history’s most impressive yet regrettable engineering feats. The Maginot Line was a 900-mile long network of underground bunkers, tunnels and concrete retractible gun batteries. Its heaviest defences were located along the 280-mile long border with Germany (Image source: WikiCommons) It was one of the most formidable military projects in history France’s Commission d’Organisation des Régions Fortifiées (CORF) spent 10 years designing, laying down, improving and extending the border fortifications that would eventually become known as the Maginot Line.
Recommended publications
  • A HISTORICAL JOURNEY HISTORY NOTEBOOK Culture Science Education Services Name:
    HISTORY NOTEBOOK FROM YEARS 9OLD A HISTORICAL JOURNEY First Name: .............................................. Name: ...................................................... PRIMARY Culture Science Education Services www.memorial-caen.com WELCOME TO THE CAEN MÉMORIAL This museum opened in 1988 will take you through the history of the 20th century. Your booklet will guide you through the various spaces in the Mémorial that are dedicated to the Second World War. Flags of countries that fought during Building in the shape of a limestone rock Fault symbolising PRIMARY the Battle of Normandy. broken in two, symbolising the damage the breach opened by suffered by the city of Caen. the Allies during D-Day. On each page of this booklet, you will find: The French Resistance 1 In the orange square: A photo of the room YEARS FRANCE IN THE DARK where you have to go. Look for this Name: photograph in the room and write down the name Using information ………………...........................……......................... of this Resistance fi ghter. from the text, give a name to this photo. 2 In the speech-bubbles: Questions. Stones Non-Violence Phrase by Paul Dorey, from Caen, and messages is a sculpture made by the Swedish speaking in the name of Normandy given by various Carl Fredrik Reuterswärd. One of the « Pain crushed me, fraternity put me In a rectangle: A text that countries when copies of this piece was installed on the back up, a river of freedom gushed 3 will help you answer the questions, the Mémorial forecourt of the UN headquarters in from my wound ». opened in 1988. New York. or that you can read after the visit of the museum.
    [Show full text]
  • World War II and Australia
    Essay from “Australia’s Foreign Wars: Origins, Costs, Future?!” http://www.anu.edu.au/emeritus/members/pages/ian_buckley/ This Essay (illustrated) also available on The British Empire at: http://www.britishempire.co.uk/article/australiaswars9.htm 9. World War II and Australia A. September 3, 1939, War 1 (a) Poland Invaded, Britain Declares War, Australia Follows (b) Britain continues ‘Standing By’ – the Phoney War (c) German U-boat and Air Superiority B. Early Defeats 5 (a) Norway, then France, Fall (b) A British Settlement with Hitler? (c) Challenge to Churchill’s leadership fails C. Germany invades Russia 11 (a) Germany Invades Russia, June 22, 1941 (b) Churchill and Roosevelt Meet – the Atlantic Charter D. Japan Enters WWII 16 (a) Early lightning gains – with historical roots (b) Singapore Falls; facing invasion, Australia fights back (c) Midway Battle turns the Naval Tide (d) Young Australians repel forces aimed at Port Moresby (e) Its Security Assured, how then should Australia have fought the Pacific War? E. Back to ‘Germany First’& further delaying the Second Front 30 (a) The Strategy and Rationale (b) Post-Stalingrad Eastern Front: January 1943 – May 1945 (c) Britain’s Contribution to ‘Winning the War against Germany’ F. The Dominions and the RAF’s Air War on Germany (a) The Origins of the ‘Empire Air Training Scheme’ (EATS) 35 (b) EATS and the Defence of Australia - any Connection? (c) Air Operations – Europe (d) Ill-used Australian Aircrew (e) RAF Bomber Command and its Operations – (see Official UK, US Reports!) (f) A contrast: US Air Force’s Specific Target Bombing from mid-1944 G.
    [Show full text]
  • NARVIK – Norwegian Eldorado for Wreck-Divers Wrecks of Narvik
    NARVIK – Norwegian Eldorado for wreck-divers Wrecks of Narvik Text by Erling Skjold (history and diving) and Frank Bang (diving) Underwater photography by Frank Bang Ship photography by Erling Skjolds, NSA collection Translation by Michael Symes Dieter von Roeder The port of Narvik in north Norway was established around the export of iron-ore from Sweden. This was due to the very good harbour and its ice-free con- ditions. At the outbreak of World War II, Narvik was a strategically important harbour, and during the first few days of the war a very intense battle was fought out here between German, Norwegian and British naval forces. During this fighting several ships were sunk, both warships and civil merchant ships. Narvik harbour was transformed into a great ship ceme- tery, with wrecks sticking up out of the water every- where. Several of the ships were later salvaged, but many wrecks still remained. With its high density of wrecks, Narvik is an eldorado for wreck divers. A diver explores the wreck of the German destroyer Hermann Künne in Trollvika 61 X-RAY MAG : 5 : 2005 EDITORIAL FEATURES TRAVEL NEWS EQUIPMENT BOOKS SCIENCE & ECOLOGY EDUCATION PROFILES PORTFOLIO CLASSIFIED features Narvik Wrecks www.navalhistory.net Narvik harbour Maps outline battles in Narvik and around Norway during World War II Narvik harbour The importance of Narvik as a strate- Attack on April 9th the Eidsvold in just a few seconds. The that it was British gic harbour increased immediately at The German attack was a great surprise German ships could thereafter sail into forces that were the outbreak of World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • The Old Pangbournian Record Volume 2
    The Old Pangbournian Record Volume 2 Casualties in War 1917-2020 Collected and written by Robin Knight (56-61) The Old Pangbournian Society The Old angbournianP Record Volume 2 Casualties in War 1917-2020 Collected and written by Robin Knight (56-61) The Old Pangbournian Society First published in the UK 2020 The Old Pangbournian Society Copyright © 2020 The moral right of the Old Pangbournian Society to be identified as the compiler of this work is asserted in accordance with Section 77 of the Copyright, Design and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, “Beloved by many. stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any Death hides but it does not divide.” * means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior consent of the Old Pangbournian Society in writing. All photographs are from personal collections or publicly-available free sources. Back Cover: © Julie Halford – Keeper of Roll of Honour Fleet Air Arm, RNAS Yeovilton ISBN 978-095-6877-031 Papers used in this book are natural, renewable and recyclable products sourced from well-managed forests. Typeset in Adobe Garamond Pro, designed and produced *from a headstone dedication to R.E.F. Howard (30-33) by NP Design & Print Ltd, Wallingford, U.K. Foreword In a global and total war such as 1939-45, one in Both were extremely impressive leaders, soldiers which our national survival was at stake, sacrifice and human beings. became commonplace, almost routine. Today, notwithstanding Covid-19, the scale of losses For anyone associated with Pangbourne, this endured in the World Wars of the 20th century is continued appetite and affinity for service is no almost incomprehensible.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Air Force Historical Society Journal 46
    ROYAL AIR FORCE HISTORICAL SOCIETY JOURNAL 46 2 The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the contributors concerned and are not necessarily those held by the Royal Air Force Historical Society. First published in the UK in 2009 by the Royal Air Force Historical Society All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from the Publisher in writing. ISSN 1361 4231 Printed by Windrush Group Windrush House Avenue Two Station Lane Witney OX28 4XW 3 ROYAL AIR FORCE HISTORICAL SOCIETY President Marshal of the Royal Air Force Sir Michael Beetham GCB CBE DFC AFC Vice-President Air Marshal Sir Frederick Sowrey KCB CBE AFC Committee Chairman Air Vice-Marshal N B Baldwin CB CBE FRAeS Vice-Chairman Group Captain J D Heron OBE Secretary Group Captain K J Dearman FRAeS Membership Secretary Dr Jack Dunham PhD CPsychol AMRAeS Treasurer J Boyes TD CA Members Air Commodore G R Pitchfork MBE BA FRAes *J S Cox Esq BA MA *Dr M A Fopp MA FMA FIMgt *Group Captain A J Byford MA MA RAF *Wing Commander P K Kendall BSc ARCS MA RAF Wing Commander C Cummings Editor & Publications Wing Commander C G Jefford MBE BA Manager *Ex Officio 4 CONTENTS OPENING ADDRESS – Air Chf Mshl Sir David Cousins 7 THE NORTHERN MEDITERRANEAN 1943-1945 by Wg 9 Cdr Andrew Brookes AIRBORNE FORCES IN THE NORTH MEDITERRANEAN 20 THEATRE OF OPERATIONS by Wg Cdr Colin Cummings DID ALLIED AIR INTERDICTION
    [Show full text]
  • Western Europe 1939-1945 1941-1945
    WESTERN EUROPE 1939-1945 1941-1945 1939 1941 http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/education/ Page 1 WESTERN EUROPE 1939-1945 Transcript (1939-1941) 0:00 After the First World War the Treaty of Versailles placed strict terms on Germany to prevent it from threatening its neighbours. From 1933 the new German leader, Adolf Hitler, began to challenge these restrictions which created a growing level of tension in Europe. First he moved troops back into the Rhineland area of Germany in March 1936 – this was supposed to be a demilitarised area between Germany and France. 0:28 Next in 1938 he took over neighbouring areas countries which had German- speaking populations, including Austria, Memel and then the Sudetenland region of Czechoslovakia. By 1939 the whole of Czechoslovakia was under German control, either directly or through puppet leaders whom Hitler controlled. By the autumn of 1939 he had his eyes on Poland. On September 1st German forces invaded Poland. Two days later Britain and France declared war on Germany. They had promised to defend Poland against German attack. 1:09 In reality, Britain and France could do little to help Poland. German forces used tactics known as Blitzkrieg, or Lightning War. Tanks, aircraft and motorised vehicles co-ordinated by radio allowed the Germans to make rapid advances. When the USSR invaded Poland from the East on September 17th, it was only a matter of time before the country was carved up between the two invaders. 1:36 The Polish capital, Warsaw, fell on September 27th. After the fall of Poland there was a relatively quite period sometimes called the Phoney War.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Aspects Spanish Civil
    Naval Aspects of the Spanish Civil War (1936 – 1939) Presented at HMGS Cold Wars 2005 by Admiralty Trilogy Background of the Spanish Civil War ◆ Apr 1931 – End of Spanish Monarchy, Socialist Government in power ◆ Nov 1933 – Conservatives in power: revoking social reforms ◆ Nov 1936 – Social Revolutionaries back in power: collectivizing farms, attack church institutions ◆ 17 Jul 1936 – Revolt by Moroccan Garrison to put down ‘social revolution’ as letting the nation fall apart – become known as ‘Nationalists’ ◆ The remaining government forces which remained loyal to the Republic became known as ‘Republican’ 2 Division of the Spanish Fleet ◆ Most of the officers were Nationalists, most of crew were Republican ◆ Most of the ships were Republican ◆ Never any prolonged or massive engagement during the war – usually just skirmishes ◆ Most naval activity was convoy warfare, shore bombardment, port blockade and counter-blockade operations Nationalist Heavy Cruiser Baleares 3 Division of the Spanish Fleet Nationalists Republicans Battleship 1 1 Heavy Cruiser 2 Light Cruiser 2 3 Destroyer 5 16 Torpedo Boat 5 7 Gun Boat 5 1 Mine Layer 3 - Patrol Craft 4 5 Submarine 2 12 Men 7,000 13,000 4 International Conflict ◆ Nationalists supported by Italy and Germany — Both send arms, supplies, advisors and volunteers to assist. ◆ Both recognize Franco’s government - Nov 18, 1936 ◆ Italians initiate submarine campaign Nov 36 – Feb 37: Italian sub, Italian crew, single Spanish officer ◆ Republicans supported by Soviet Union and France — Soviet support is arms, munitions, advisors, — French support is aircraft and artillery. Government is pro-Republic, but general population is divided ◆ Lyon Conference 1936: Need to stop support to both sides before civil war becomes general European war.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle of Britain, 1945–1965 : the Air Ministry and the Few / Garry Campion
    Copyrighted material – 978–0–230–28454–8 © Garry Campion 2015 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No portion of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, Saffron House, 6–10 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TS. Any person who does any unauthorised act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The author has asserted his right to be identified as the author of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published 2015 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN Palgrave Macmillan in the UK is an imprint of Macmillan Publishers Limited, registered in England, company number 785998, of Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS. Palgrave Macmillan in the US is a division of St Martin’s Press LLC, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010. Palgrave Macmillan is the global academic imprint of the above companies and has companies and representatives throughout the world. Palgrave® and Macmillan® are registered trademarks in the United States, the United Kingdom, Europe and other countries. ISBN 978–0–230–28454–8 This book is printed on paper suitable for recycling and made from fully managed and sustained forest sources. Logging, pulping and manufacturing processes are expected to conform to the environmental regulations of the country of origin. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
    [Show full text]
  • 2499 Prelims 7/4/03 2:40 Pm Page I
    Atkin 2 colours 30/4/03 4:54 pm Page 1 It is widely assumed that the French in the Cover illustration: A French soldier and two of his British Isles during the Second World War comrades, coming from Dunkirk, receive a snack THE were fully-fledged supporters of General after landing in Great Britain, 1940. Courtesy of Photos12.com – Oasis de Gaulle, and that across the channel at FORGOTTEN least, the French were a ‘nation of THE ATKIN resisters’. This highly provocative study reveals that most exiles were on British FORGOTTEN FRENCH soil by chance rather than by design, and Exiles in the British Isles, 1940-44 many were not sure whether to stay. FRENCH Overlooked by historians, who have Exiles in the British Isles, 1940-44 concentrated on the ‘Free French’ of de Gaulle, these were the ‘Forgotten French’: The forgotten French refugees swept off the beaches of Dunkirk; servicemen held in camps after the Franco-German armistice; Vichy consular officials left to cater for their compatriots; and a sizeable colonist community based mainly in London. This is a really interesting and important work, which will Drawing on little-known archival sources, this study examines the hopes and fears of be of interest to scholars of twentieth-century Britain and these communities who were bitterly France because it throws light on so many other issues. divided among themselves, some being attracted to Pétain as much as to de Dr Richard Vinen, King’s College, London Gaulle. It also looks at how they fitted into British life and how the British in turn responded.
    [Show full text]
  • No 7: 'Weather Services at War' by K D Anderson
    OCCASIONAL PAPERS ON METEOROLOGICAL HISTORY No.7 WEATHER SERVICES AT WAR by K D Anderson Published by THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY’S History of Meteorology and Physical Oceanography Special Interest Group JANUARY 2009 PUBLISHED ONLINE ONLY 104 OXFORD ROAD – READING – RG1 7LL – UNITED KINGDOM Telephone: +44 (0)118 956 8500 Fax: +44 (0)118 956 8571 E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.rmets.org Registered charity number 208222 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 1 FRIDAY 10 MAY 1940 ........................................................................................................................... 2 MONDAY 13 MAY 1940 ......................................................................................................................... 4 TUESDAY 14 MAY 1940........................................................................................................................ 6 WEDNESDAY 15 MAY 1940.................................................................................................................. 7 THURSDAY 16 MAY 1940 ..................................................................................................................... 7 FRIDAY 17 MAY 1940............................................................................................................................ 8 SATURDAY 18 MAY 1940 ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Fall of France 1940 1St Edition Pdf, Epub, Ebook
    THE FALL OF FRANCE 1940 1ST EDITION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Andrew Shennan | 9781315293684 | | | | | The Fall of France 1940 1st edition PDF Book The British garrison there surrendered on 25 May, although 4, men were evacuated by Royal Navy ships. One assault lasted for eight hours on the extreme north of the line, costing the Germans 46 dead and wounded, while just two French were killed one at Ferme-Chappy and one at Fermont fortress. Weygand had only 64 French divisions and the 51st Highland Infantry Division available. GQG considered that the Second and Ninth armies had the easiest task of the army group, dug in on the west bank of the Meuse on ground that was easily defended and behind the Ardennes, a considerable obstacle, the traversing of which would give plenty of warning of a German attack in the centre of the French front. France mobilised about one-third of the male population between the ages of 20 and 45, bringing the strength of its armed forces to 5,, Germany : 27, dead [e] , wounded 18, missing [6] [7] [8] 1, aircrew killed [9] 1, aircraft lost [6] [10] — [11] tanks lost [f] , total casualties Italy : 6,—6, [g]. In two days, the bomber force had been reduced from to Find out more on Wikipedia's Sister projects. It flew 1, bombing and 1, fighter sorties. Italy entered the war on 10 June Huntziger considered this at least a defensive success and limited his efforts to protecting the flank. The French Army consisted of three army groups. Air War Over France, — Readers also enjoyed.
    [Show full text]
  • Enduring the Battle of Britain and the Blitz
    Running head: ENDURING THE BATTLE OF BRITAIN AND THE BLTIZ 1 Enduring the Battle of Britain and the Blitz Perseverance of the British Home Front from 1940-1941 Tyler Smith A Senior Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation in the Honors Program Liberty University Fall 2016 ENDURING THE BATTLE OF BRITAIN AND THE BLITZ 2 Acceptance of Senior Honors Thesis This Senior Honors Thesis is accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation from the Honors Program of Liberty University. ______________________________ David Snead, Ph.D. Thesis Chair ______________________________ Michael Davis, Ph.D. Committee Member ______________________________ Andrea Beam, Ed.D. Committee Member ______________________________ Brenda Ayres, Ph.D. Honors Director ______________________________ Date ENDURING THE BATTLE OF BRITAIN AND THE BLITZ 3 Abstract The Blitz was a roughly nine-month mass bombing of London and other cities in Great Britain by the German Luftwaffe in 1940-1941. It was a time of great destruction and death but also of unity and courage among the British people. After the war had ended, Winston Churchill described how “for a year, all alone, the people of this island defied the tyrants of the world and held the fort for freedom until other great nations, themselves assailed, came into the line of battle.”1 The Germans aimed to achieve a decisive defeat of Britain. They believed that by attacking the civilian population, the people would be miserable and desperate enough to sue for peace. Instead, the opposite occurred. Great Britain unified and defied the conventional expectations, not only resisting defeat but eventually even convincing the Germans that the effort was futile.
    [Show full text]