DOCSLIB.ORG

Short-Range Numerical Weather Prediction Using Time-Lagged Ensembles

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Short-Range Numerical Weather Prediction Using Time-Lagged Ensembles 580 WEATHER AND FORECASTING VOLUME 22 Short-Range Numerical Weather Prediction Using Time-Lagged Ensembles CHUNGU LU,* HUILING YUAN,BARRY E. SCHWARTZ, AND STANLEY G. BENJAMIN NOAA/Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado (Manuscript received 3 February 2006, in final form 20 September 2006) ABSTRACT A time-lagged ensemble forecast system is developed using a set of hourly initialized Rapid Update Cycle model deterministic forecasts. Both the ensemble-mean and probabilistic forecasts from this time-lagged ensemble system present a promising improvement in the very short-range weather forecasting of 1–3 h, which may be useful for aviation weather prediction and nowcasting applications. Two approaches have been studied to combine deterministic forecasts with different initialization cycles as the ensemble mem- bers. The first method uses a set of equally weighted time-lagged forecasts and produces a forecast by taking the ensemble mean. The second method adopts a multilinear regression approach to select a set of weights for different time-lagged forecasts. It is shown that although both methods improve short-range forecasts, the unequally weighted method provides the best results for all forecast variables at all levels. The time- lagged ensembles also provide a sample of statistics, which can be used to construct probabilistic forecasts. 1. Introduction Brooks et al. (1995) examined the feasibility of SREF applications in NWP. Du et al. (1997) examined the Because of the uncertainties in the numerical impact of initial condition uncertainty on quantitative weather prediction (NWP) models, analyses, and fore- precipitation forecasts from SREFs based on a meso- casts, ensemble methods have been studied in the re- scale model. Hamill and Colucci (1997, 1998) evaluated search community quite extensively in recent years. the performance of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Many forecast centers around the world, such as the Administration (NOAA)/NCEP’s Eta Model– European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Fore- Regional Spectral Model (RSM) SREFs. Following casts (ECMWF) and the National Centers for Environ- these studies, an experimental SREF was developed at mental Prediction (NCEP), have also developed and NOAA/NCEP, and a series of studies were conducted implemented various ensemble forecast systems to gen- for evaluating this system (e.g., Stensrud et al. 1999; erate forecast references and guidelines in addition to Wandishin et al. 2001). The further development of this the deterministic ones. The short-range ensemble fore- system into operations has been described in Du and casts (SREFs) concern forecast lead times between 0 Tracton (2001), and the possibility of including mem- and 48 h, and typically use limited-area models with bers from the NOAA Rapid Update Cycle (RUC) fore- relatively fine spatial resolutions and frequent forecast cast system has been reported upon in Lu et al. (2004). outputs. With the advance of computational ability and A comprehensive verification of SREF was also con- the success of the medium-range ensemble forecasting, ducted in Hou et al. (2001) for the Storm and Mesoscale Ensemble Experiment (SAMEX). The NOAA RUC forecast system (Benjamin et al. 2004a,b; Bleck and Benjamin 1993) has been consis- * Additional affiliation: Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colo- tently putting out regional weather forecasts in the rado. short range over the years. Because the RUC system assimilates high-frequency observational data in an hourly cycle, its 1–12-h forecasts have provided a valu- Corresponding author address: Chungu Lu, NOAA/Earth Sys- tem Research Laboratory, 325 South Broadway, Boulder, CO able reference and complement to less frequently up- 80305. dated forecasts from other operational NOAA models. E-mail: [email protected] Also, because of the same reason, one may wonder how DOI: 10.1175/WAF999.1 © 2007 American Meteorological Society Unauthenticated | Downloaded 09/27/21 10:52 AM UTC WAF999 JUNE 2007 L U E T A L . 581 forecasts from these hourly initializations vary, and, if examine the forecast variability among forecasts from there is some variability, how feasible and sensible an different initialization cycles. Next, we will describe ensemble forecast is by using these forecasts as a set of how to construct time-lagged ensembles using the eight ensemble members. available deterministic forecasts within a 12-h initializa- Time-lagged ensemble forecasting has been studied tion cycle, and briefly introduce the verification– and proposed for the medium range of 6–10 days (Hoff- observation data and method. In the next section, we man and Kalnay 1983; Dalcher et al. 1988; van den obtain time-lagged ensemble forecasts using a simple Dool and Rukhovets 1994). The concept has also been ensemble mean approach (equally weighted). These applied to the short-range forecast recently in Hou et time-lagged ensembles along with various deterministic al. (2001) and in Walser et al. (2004). We have experi- forecasts are verified against upper-air (rawinsonde) mented with the time-lagged ensemble approach using observations at station locations (section 3). To further the NOAA RUC for a number of years. The current reduce the ensemble forecast error, we construct time- study is a report on this effort. We believe that the lagged ensembles with unequal-weighted forecasts us- method we present in this study can be applied to any ing a multilinear regression method (section 4). In sec- rapid update data assimilation and forecast system. tion 5, we will conduct verifications of the probabilistic One reason to adopt the time-lagged ensemble tech- forecasts, constructed by time-lagged ensembles. Con- nique to the short-range forecasting is because a short- clusions will be provided in section 6. range forecast generally possesses a relatively strong dependency on the initial conditions. The forecast er- rors in the very short range may be strongly correlated 2. Time-lagged ensemble method to the uncertainties in the initial analysis. The time- a. Description of the forecast model lagged ensembles can be interpreted as forecasts ob- The NOAA RUC forecast/data assimilation system tained from a set of perturbed initial conditions (van was developed at the NOAA/Forecast Systems Labo- den Dool and Rukhovets 1994). Because these initial ratory (currently, the NOAA/Earth System Research perturbations are generated from different forecast ini- Laboratory/Global System Division), and has been tialization cycles, conceptually, time-lagged ensembles used as the operational forecast model for the Federal reflect the forecast error covariance with time-evolving Aviation Administration (FAA) and also been used as (flow dependent) information. In the very short range, the rapid update forecast and data assimilation system this flow-dependent forecast error can be, for example, at NOAA/NCEP. The model’s dynamical core is com- a result of an initial imbalance or a shock of model posed of a hybrid terrain-following sigma (at lower lev- fields due to various data being ingested at initialization els) and isentropic (at upper levels) vertical coordi- time and the ensuing adjustment of the model fields. nates, and a set of hydrostatic primitive equations. In In this study, we will report on how a time-lagged addition, there is a complete set of physical parameter- ensemble forecast system can be constructed using ization schemes, including those for the planetary forecasts from the RUC, and evaluate how much skill boundary layer, radiation, land surface physics, cumu- this type of ensemble forecast can provide over each lus convection, and explicit mixed-phase cloud physics, individual deterministic forecast for the very short to represent various physical processes in the model range weather prediction of 1–3 h. This type of short- and to close the model dynamic equations. The data range ensemble forecast system could be used in short- assimilation system includes a series of implementa- range decision support systems, such as those for avia- tions of optimal interpolation (OI), three-dimensional tion weather forecast applications including air traffic variational data assimilation (3DVAR) analysis, and management, in which case frequent updates to a fore- the nudging technique. The nudging technique is cast are needed. Analyses and verification of these mostly applied to the surface fields, while the main at- time-lagged ensemble systems, for both the ensemble mospheric fields are assimilated with the 3DVAR al- mean and probabilistic forecasts, will be conducted. We gorithm. The lateral-boundary conditions are given by will introduce two different approaches for the weight- NCEP Eta Model (for detail, see the aforementioned ing of RUC hourly forecasts, and compare the improve- references). ment of short-range forecasts by these two ensemble The RUC horizontal domain covers the contiguous systems. United States and adjacent areas of Canada, Mexico, The paper is organized as follows. In section 2, we and the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans. The operational will first give a brief description of the NOAA RUC RUC has been run at a series of horizontal grid spac- data assimilation and modeling system. We will then ings: 60, 40, 20, and 13 km. In this study, we use the Unauthenticated | Downloaded 09/27/21 10:52 AM UTC 582 WEATHER AND FORECASTING VOLUME 22 40-km resolution analyses and forecasts during Novem- ered for the ensemble member pool. Figure 3 shows ber and December of 2003. There are 24 runs per day, schematically a time-lagged ensemble forecast system. but we only use the forecasts that are initialized within Because the forecast data from the hourly initialization 12 h previously. The hourly runs of the operational for operational 40-km RUC runs were archived up to 6 RUC 40-km data are archived for only the first 6 h, with h, after that only the forecast data with 3-hourly initial- the longer archives limited to the 3-hourly runs (e.g., izations were archived, the maximum size of the time- 0000, 0300, 0600 UTC, etc.).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Snow Modeling and Observations at NOAA's National Operational
    Snow Modeling and Observations at NOAA’S National Operational Hydrologic Remote Sensing Center Thomas R. Carroll National Operational Hydrologic Remote Sensing Center, National Weather Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Chanhassen, Minnesota, USA Abstract The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) National Operational Hydrologic Remote Sensing Center (NOHRSC) routinely ingests all of the electronically available, real-time, ground-based, snow data; airborne snow water equivalent data; satellite areal extent of snow cover information; and numerical weather prediction (NWP) model forcings for the coterminous United States. The NWP model forcings are physically downscaled from their native 13 kilometer2 (km) spatial resolution to a 1 km2 resolution for the coterminous United States. The downscaled NWP forcings drive the NOHRSC Snow Model (NSM) that includes an energy-and-mass-balance snow accumulation and ablation model run at a 1 km2 spatial resolution and at a 1 hour temporal resolution for the country. The ground-based, airborne, and satellite snow observations are assimilated into the model state variables simulated by the NSM using a Newtonian nudging technique. The principle advantages of the assimilation technique are: (1) approximate balance is maintained in the NSM, (2) physical processes are easily accommodated in the model, and (3) asynoptic data are incorporated at the appropriate times. The NSM is reinitialized with the assimilated snow observations to generate a variety of snow products that combine to form NOAA’s NOHRSC National Snow Analyses (NSA). The NOHRSC NSA incorporate all of the information necessary and available to produce a “best estimate” of real-time snow cover conditions at 1 km2 spatial resolution and 1 hour temporal resolution for the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Visibility Forecasts from the RUC20
    5.10 Visibility Forecasts from the RUC20 Tracy Lorraine Smith*, Stanley G. Benjamin, and John M. Brown NOAA Research – Forecast Systems Laboratory Boulder, CO 80305 USA *Also affliliated with the Cooperative Institue for Research in the Atmosphere * email – [email protected] 1. Introduction 2002. The primary model changes in the RUC20 include a new Grell convective parameterization, At least five characteristics of the new 20-km explicit clouds using mixed phase microphysics, Rapid Update Cycle (RUC20, Benjamin et al. an update to the RUC/MM5 Reisner level-4 2002a, this volume), being implemented at NCEP mixed-phase microphysics developed jointly by in April 2002, should contribute to improvements NCAR and FSL, and new land-surface in visibility forecasts. These include higher processes. RUC20 also assimilates GOES horizontal and vertical resolution (from 40 km to cloud-top data to assist in the description of initial 20 km, 40 to 50 levels), improved versions of the cloud/hydrometeor fields. The smaller grid size MM5/RUC mixed-phase cloud microphysics and also allows the RUC20 to resolve smaller areas RUC land-surface schemes, assimilation of of clouds and precipitation, which should benefit GOES cloud information modifying RUC 1-h visibility diagnoses. A more accurate diurnal hydrometeor forecasts (Benjamin et al. 2002b), cycle with a more frequent call to the shortwave and an improved RUC visibility algorithm radiation module should also make a minor (Smirnova et al. 2000), which was originally contribution toward diagnosis of fog/low-level based on the Stoelinga-Warner method. clouds. Ongoing 3-h verification against METAR visibility observations is being conducted for forecasts The visibility field from the RUC is output from a from both the RUC2 (called RUC40 in this paper) visibility translation algorithm that uses near- and the RUC20 to assess the impact of the surface hydrometeor (cloud water, rain water, changes.
    [Show full text]
  • A North American Hourly Assimilation and Model Forecast Cycle: the Rapid Refresh
    APRIL 2016 B E N J A M I N E T A L . 1669 A North American Hourly Assimilation and Model Forecast Cycle: The Rapid Refresh STANLEY G. BENJAMIN,STEPHEN S. WEYGANDT,JOHN M. BROWN,MING HU,* CURTIS R. ALEXANDER,* TATIANA G. SMIRNOVA,* JOSEPH B. OLSON,* ERIC P. JAMES,* 1 DAVID C. DOWELL,GEORG A. GRELL,HAIDAO LIN, STEVEN E. PECKHAM,* 1 TRACY LORRAINE SMITH, WILLIAM R. MONINGER,* AND JAYMES S. KENYON* NOAA/Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado GEOFFREY S. MANIKIN NOAA/NWS/NCEP/Environmental Modeling Center, College Park, Maryland (Manuscript received 8 July 2015, in final form 8 December 2015) ABSTRACT The Rapid Refresh (RAP), an hourly updated assimilation and model forecast system, replaced the Rapid Update Cycle (RUC) as an operational regional analysis and forecast system among the suite of models at the NOAA/National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) in 2012. The need for an effective hourly updated assimilation and modeling system for the United States for situational awareness and related decision- making has continued to increase for various applications including aviation (and transportation in general), severe weather, and energy. The RAP is distinct from the previous RUC in three primary aspects: a larger geographical domain (covering North America), use of the community-based Advanced Research version of the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model (ARW) replacing the RUC forecast model, and use of the Gridpoint Statistical Interpolation analysis system (GSI) instead of the RUC three-dimensional variational data assimilation (3DVar). As part of the RAP development, modifications have been made to the community ARW model (especially in model physics) and GSI assimilation systems, some based on previous model and assimilation design innovations developed initially with the RUC.
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigation of Severe Weather Environments in Atmospheric Reanalyses Austin Taylor King
    University of North Dakota UND Scholarly Commons Theses and Dissertations Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects January 2018 An Investigation Of Severe Weather Environments In Atmospheric Reanalyses Austin Taylor King Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.und.edu/theses Recommended Citation King, Austin Taylor, "An Investigation Of Severe Weather Environments In Atmospheric Reanalyses" (2018). Theses and Dissertations. 2251. https://commons.und.edu/theses/2251 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects at UND Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UND Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AN INVESTIGATION OF SEVERE WEATHER ENVIRONMENTS IN ATMOSPHERIC REANALYSES by Austin Taylor King Bachelor of Science, University of Oklahoma, 2016 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of North Dakota in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Grand Forks, North Dakota May 2018 Copyright 2018 Austin King ii PERMISSION Title An Investigation of Severe Weather Environments in Atmospheric Reanalyses Department Atmospheric Sciences Degree Master of Science In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a graduate degree from the University of North Dakota, I agree that the library of this University shall make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for extensive copying for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professor who supervised my thesis work or, in his absence, by the Chairperson of the department or the dean of the School of Graduate Studies.
    [Show full text]
  • COOPERATIVE INSTITUTE for RESEARCH in ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES University of Colorado at Boulder UCB 216 Boulder, CO 80309-0216
    CELEB ra TING 0 OF ENVI R ONMENT A L RESE arc H years 4 COOPERATIVE INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH ANNU A L REPO R T IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES University of Colorado at Boulder i 00 2 8 COOPERATIVE INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES University of Colorado at Boulder UCB 216 Boulder, CO 80309-0216 Phone: 303-492-1143 Fax: 303-492-1149 email: [email protected] http://cires.colorado.edu ANNU A L REPO R T ST A FF Suzanne van Drunick, Coordinator Jennifer Gunther, Designer Katy Human, Editor COVE R PHOTO Pat and Rosemarie Keough part of traveling photographic exhibit Antarctica—Passion and Obsession Sponsored by CIRES in celebration of 40th Anniversary ii From the Director 2 Executive Summary and Research Highlights 4 The Institute Year in Review 12 Contributions to NOAA’s Strategic Vision 13 Administration and Funding 16 Creating a Dynamic Research Environment 21 CIRES People and Projects 26 Faculty Fellows Research 27 Scientific Centers 58 Education and Outreach 68 Visiting Fellows 70 Innovative Research Projects 73 Graduate Student Research Fellowships 83 Diversity and Undergraduate Research Programs 85 Theme Reports 86 Measures of Achievement: Calendar Year 2007 146 Publications by the Numbers 147 Refereed publications 148 Non-refereed Publications 172 Refereed Journals in which CIRES Scientists Published 179 Honors and Awards 181 Service 185 Appendices 188 Governance and Management 189 Personnel Demographics 193 Acronyms and Abbreviations 194 CIRES Annual Report 2008 1 From the Director 2 CIRES Annual Report 2008 am very proud to present the new CIRES annual report for fiscal year 2008. It has been another exciting year with numerous accomplishments, Iawards, and continued growth in our research staff and budget.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wind Forecast Improvement Project (WFIP) Is a U
    WFIP NOAA Final Report - Page i TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................. i Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................. 1 1. Project Overview .................................................................................................................................. 4 1.1 Goals and Key Tasks ........................................................................................................................ 4 1.2 Team Partners, Two Study Areas ....................................................................................................... 8 2. WFIP Observations ............................................................................................................................. 11 2.1 Instrumentation ............................................................................................................................ 11 2.2 Site Selection and Preparation, Leases, Data Transmission and Handling ............................................. 21 2.3 Data Quality Control and Instrument Performance ........................................................................... 22 2.3 Instrument Inter-comparisons ........................................................................................................ 31 3. NOAA Models ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NAEFS Status and Future Plan
    NAEFS Status and Future Plan Yuejian Zhu Ensemble team leader Environmental Modeling Center NCEP/NWS/NOAA Presentation for International S2S conference February 14 2014 Warnings Warnings Coordination Coordination Assessments Forecasts Guidance Forecasts Guidance Watches Watches Outlook Outlook Threats & & Alert Alert Products Forecast Lead Time Minutes Minutes Life & Property NOAA Hours Hours Aviation Days Days Spanning 1 Maritime 1 Week Week Seamless 2 Space Operations 2 Week Week Fire Weather Fire Weather Months Months Emergency Mgmt Climate/Weather/Water Commerce Suite Benefits Seasons Seasons Energy Planning Hydropower of Reservoir Control Forecast O G O O H C U D R C R D Y L T P S Agriculture I Years Years Recreation Weather Prediction Climate Prediction Ecosystem Products Health Products Uncertainty ForecastForecast Uncertainty Forecast Uncertainty Environment Warnings Warnings Coordination Coordination Assessments Forecasts Guidance Forecasts Guidance Watches Watches Outlook Outlook Threats & & Alert Alert Forecast Lead Time Products Service CenterPerspective Minutes Minutes Life & Property NOAA Hours Hours Aviation Days Days 1 1 Maritime Spanning Week Week Seamless SPC 2 Space Operations 2 Week Week Fire Weather HPC Fire Weather Months Months Emergency Mgmt AWC Climate/Weather Climate OPC Commerce Suite Linkage Benefits Seasons Seasons SWPC Energy Planning CPC TPC Hydropower of and Reservoir Control Forecast Reservoir Control Fire WeatherOutlooks toDay8 Week 2HazardsAssessment Winter WeatherDeskDays1-3 Seasonal Predictions NDFD,
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for the Preparation of Final Papers for EUMETSAT Conferences
    Proceedings for the 13th International Winds Workshop 27 June - 1 July 2016, Monterey, California, USA STATUS OF THE OPERATIONAL SATELLITE WINDS PRODUCTION AT CPTEC/INPE AND IT USAGE IN REGIONAL DATA ASSIMILATION OVER SOUTH AMERICA Renato G. Negri, Luiz F. Sapucci, Lucas Avanço, Nelson Ferreira, Luiz G. G. Gonçalves National Institute for Space Research, Center for Weather Forecasting and Climate Research, Rod. Pres. Dutra, km 40, Cachoeira Paulista, SP, 12.630-000, Brazil Abstract Tropospheric winds are estimated using satellite imagery since late 60's and today they are a very important source of information for numerical weather forecasts. The CPTEC/INPE has being producing Atmospheric Motion Vectors (AMV), operationally, since early 2000's, using GOES satellites. The typical spatial coverage is the South America and surrounding oceans covered by the GOES satellites. The wind extraction at CPTEC/INPE is done using the visible, near infrared (3.9 µm) water vapor absorption (6.7 µm) and window infrared (10.2 µm) channels. The visible and 3.9 µm are used only to estimate the low level winds for day and night only respectively, 6.7 µm allows to estimate winds at middle and high troposphere and 10.2 µm is used to estimate the wind at all tropospheric layers. This algorithm makes use of triplets of successive GOES images with at least 30 minutes between each pair, which allow having a new wind field at least half hour. The quality control applied to the wind fields is based on developed at EUMETSAT where each AMV receive a quality indicator and the final users can choose what level is more suitable to their application.
    [Show full text]
  • Eric James CIRES Associate Scientist III NOAA/ESRL, R/GSD1 325 Broadway Boulder, CO 80305-3328 Office Phone (303) 497-4278 [email protected]
    Eric James CIRES Associate Scientist III NOAA/ESRL, R/GSD1 325 Broadway Boulder, CO 80305-3328 Office Phone (303) 497-4278 [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0002-6507-4997 ResearcherID: C-7713-2015 Scopus ID: 55434490100 ________________________________________________________________________________________________ Education M.S. in Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, 2009. B.S. in Meteorology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2006. B.S. in Geography, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2006. Work Experience Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, 216 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309. Professional Research Assistant, May 2010 to present. Helped with the development, maintenance, testing of high-resolution short-range numerical weather prediction models in preparation for operational implementation. Full time. Salary $72,000. Supervisor Dr. Stan Benjamin (303) 497-6387, [email protected]. Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, 1371 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80526. Research Associate, June 2009 to April 2010. Undertook research in mesoscale meteorology, prepared related papers for publication. Full time. Salary $26,000. Supervisor Dr. Richard Johnson (970) 491-8321, [email protected]. Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University. 1371 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80526. Graduate Research Assistant, August 2006 to May 2009. Conducted thesis research in mesoscale meteorology, prepared related presentations and papers. 40 hours/week. $12.50/hour. Supervisor Dr. Richard Johnson (970) 491-8321, [email protected]. The Forge for Families. 3150 Yellowstone Blvd., Houston, TX 77054. Group Leader, June to July 2006. Supervised fund-raising car washes by inner city youth. 20 hours/week.
    [Show full text]
  • An Improved Weighting Method of Time-Lag-Ensemble Averaging for Hourly Precipitation Forecasts and Its Application in a Typhoon-Induced Heavy Rainfall Event
    atmosphere Article An Improved Weighting Method of Time-Lag-Ensemble Averaging for Hourly Precipitation Forecasts and Its Application in a Typhoon-Induced Heavy Rainfall Event Li Zhou 1,2, Lin Xu 1,2,*, Mingcai Lan 1,2 and Jingjing Chen 1,2 1 Hunan Meteorological Service, Changsha 410118, China; [email protected] (L.Z.); [email protected] (M.L.); [email protected] (J.C.) 2 Key Laboratory of Preventing and Reducing Meteorological Disaster in Hunan Province, Changsha 410118, China * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-731-8560-0016 Abstract: Heavy rainfall events often cause great societal and economic impacts. The prediction ability of traditional extrapolation techniques decreases rapidly with the increase in the lead time. Moreover, deficiencies of high-resolution numerical models and high-frequency data assimilation will increase the prediction uncertainty. To address these shortcomings, based on the hourly precipitation prediction of Global/Regional Assimilation and Prediction System-Cycle of Hourly Assimilation and Forecast (GRAPES-CHAF) and Shanghai Meteorological Service-WRF ADAS Rapid Refresh System (SMS-WARR), we present an improved weighting method of time-lag-ensemble averaging for hourly precipitation forecast which gives more weight to heavy rainfall and can quickly select the optimal ensemble members for forecasting. In addition, by using the cross-magnitude weight (CMW) Citation: Zhou, L.; Xu, L.; Lan, M.; method, mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE) and correlation coefficient Chen,
    [Show full text]
  • Tropospheric Parameter Estimation Based on GNSS Tracking Data of A
    DISSERTATION Tropospheric delay parameters derived from GNSS-tracking data of a fast-moving fleet of trains Ausgeführt zum Zwecke der Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der technischen Wissenschaften unter der Leitung von Ao.Univ.Prof. Dipl.-Ing. Dr.techn. Robert Weber am E 120-4 Department für Geodäsie und Geoinformation eingereicht an der Technischen Universität Wien Fakultät für Mathematik und Geoinformation von Matthias Aichinger-Rosenberger Matr.Nr: 00926550 Ried 14/7 6306 Söll Wien, Februar 2021 (Unterschrift Verfasser/in) (Unterschrift Betreuer/in) i “Wonach du sehnlich ausgeschaut, Es wurde dir beschieden. Du triumphierst und jubelst laut Jetzt hab ich endlich Frieden! Ach, Freundchen, rede nicht so wild, Bez¨ahme deine Zunge! Ein jeder Wunsch, wenn er erf¨ullt, Kriegtaugenblicklich Junge.” —Wilhelm Busch (1832-1908) ii Acknowledgements Theverse on the previous page, composed by thefamousGermanwriterWilhelm Busch, Ihad stumbled upon awhile agoinsomeold bookathome. From there on,I knew thatIneeded to add it to this thesis as an opening line since there’spractically no better way of describing myacademiccareer over the years. And as I’mwriting this and therebyfinish this chapter,there’s already somethingnew and exciting coming up forthe future. Nevertheless before that is nowthe time to thank everybodywho made this thesis and my PhD studies possible. First and foremost, Iwouldliketothank Prof. Robert Weber, who served as my supervisorand mentor not only forthis thesis but at allaspectsofuniversitylife. Thanks forgiving me the opportunity to jointhe research divisionand pursue such an interesting PhDstudy. Furthermore thanks to: Johannes B¨ohm,again forthe chance to start an academic career at TU Wien and forcompetent advice with his expertknowledge in atmosphericmodelling and space geodesy.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of an International Conference on Transport, Atmosphere and Climate (TAC) Oxford, United Kingdom, 26Th to 29Th June 2006
    Proceedings of an International Conference on Transport, Atmosphere and Climate (TAC) Oxford, United Kingdom, 26th to 29th June 2006 Edited by Robert Sausen, Anja Blum, David S. Lee and Claus Brüning 2 Proceedings of the TAC-Conference, June 26 to 29, 2006, Oxford, UK http://www.pa.op.dlr.de/tac/proceedings.html Edited by Robert Sausen1, Anja Blum1, David S. Lee2 and Claus Brüning3 Oberpfaffenhofen, September 2007 1 Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre, Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V., Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany 2 Dalton Research Institute, Manchester Metropolitan University, Department of Environmental and Geographical Sciences, United Kingdom 3 European Commission, DG Research, Directorate Environment, Unit 'Climate Change and Environmental Risks’, Brussels, Belgium Proceedings of the TAC-Conference, June 26 to 29, 2006, Oxford, UK 3 Foreword The "International Conference on Transport, Atmosphere and Climate (TAC)" held in Oxford (United Kingdom), 2006, was organised with the objective of updating our knowledge on the at- mospheric impacts of transport, three years after the "European Conference on Aviation, Atmos- phere and Climate (AAC)" in Friedrichshafen (Lake Constance, Germany). While the AAC conference concentrated on aviation, the scope was widened to include all modes of transport in order to allow a equitable comparison of the impacts on the atmospheric composition and on climate. In particular, the conference covered the following topics: - engine emissions (gaseous and particulate), - emission scenarios and emission
    [Show full text]