DOCSLIB.ORG

An Investigation of Severe Weather Environments in Atmospheric Reanalyses Austin Taylor King

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Investigation of Severe Weather Environments in Atmospheric Reanalyses Austin Taylor King University of North Dakota UND Scholarly Commons Theses and Dissertations Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects January 2018 An Investigation Of Severe Weather Environments In Atmospheric Reanalyses Austin Taylor King Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.und.edu/theses Recommended Citation King, Austin Taylor, "An Investigation Of Severe Weather Environments In Atmospheric Reanalyses" (2018). Theses and Dissertations. 2251. https://commons.und.edu/theses/2251 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects at UND Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UND Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AN INVESTIGATION OF SEVERE WEATHER ENVIRONMENTS IN ATMOSPHERIC REANALYSES by Austin Taylor King Bachelor of Science, University of Oklahoma, 2016 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of North Dakota in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Grand Forks, North Dakota May 2018 Copyright 2018 Austin King ii PERMISSION Title An Investigation of Severe Weather Environments in Atmospheric Reanalyses Department Atmospheric Sciences Degree Master of Science In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a graduate degree from the University of North Dakota, I agree that the library of this University shall make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for extensive copying for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professor who supervised my thesis work or, in his absence, by the Chairperson of the department or the dean of the School of Graduate Studies. It is understood that any copying or publication or other use of this thesis or part thereof for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. It is also understood that due recognition shall be given to me and to the University of North Dakota in any scholarly use which may be made of any material in my thesis. Austin Taylor King May 4, 2018 iv TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................... vii LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................ ix ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................................................. x ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................... xi CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... 1 Background .................................................................................... 1 Severe Weather in Atmospheric Reanalyses ...................... 1 Trends in Severe Weather Environments ........................... 4 Purpose of Study ............................................................................. 7 II. REANALYSIS DATASETS ..................................................................... 9 Overview ......................................................................................... 9 Details ........................................................................................... 10 NARR ............................................................................... 10 ERA-Interim ..................................................................... 10 MERRA2 .......................................................................... 11 JRA55 ............................................................................... 12 v 20CR ................................................................................. 12 CFSR ................................................................................ 13 III. METHODS .............................................................................................. 15 Reanalysis Comparison ................................................................ 15 Climatology .................................................................................. 19 IV. EXAMPLE CASES ................................................................................. 28 3 May 1999 OKC .......................................................................... 28 18 July 2004 GFK ......................................................................... 31 V. RESULTS ................................................................................................. 41 Reanalysis Performance and Comparison .................................... 41 Statistical Results ............................................................. 41 Comparison of Reanalyses to T03 and T07 ..................... 44 Climatology and Trends in Severe Weather Parameters .............. 47 Climatology ...................................................................... 48 Trends in Environments Favorable for Severe Weather .. 49 VI. DISCUSSION ........................................................................................... 76 Reanalysis Performance and Comparison .................................... 76 Climatology and Trends in Severe Weather Parameters .............. 79 VII. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ....................................................... 84 Reanalysis Performance and Comparison .................................... 84 Climatology and Trends in Severe Weather Parameters .............. 86 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................. 88 vi LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Box and whiskers plots of MLCAPE and ESRH for RUC-2 proximity soundings sorted by storm type .................................................................................... 27 2. Surface analyses for RUC-2 at 23 UTC 3 May 1999 and reanalyses at 00 UTC 4 May 1999 .................................................................................................... 34 3. 500 mb analyses for RUC-2 at 23 UTC 3 May 1999 and reanalyses at 00 UTC 4 May 1999 .................................................................................................... 35 4. Proximity soundings near Oklahoma City, OK for RUC-2 at 23 UTC 3 May 1999 and reanalyses at 00 UTC 4 May 1999 ................................................... 36 5. Observed sounding for Norman, OK (OUN) at 00 UTC 4 May 1999 ......................... 37 6. 00 UTC 19 July 2004 surface analyses for the reanalyses ........................................... 38 7. 00 UTC 19 July 2004 500 mb analyses for the reanalyses .......................................... 39 8. Proximity soundings near Grand Forks, ND for RUC-2 at 23 UTC 3 May 1999 and reanalyses at 00 UTC 19 July 2004 .................................................. 40 9. Box and whiskers plots of MLCAPE, EFFSRH, SCP, and 0-1 km bulk shear for RUC-2 and the reanalyses ............................................................................ 58 10. Violin plots of MLCAPE for RUC-2 and the reanalyses .......................................... 59 11. Violin plots of EFFSRH for RUC-2 and the reanalyses ............................................ 60 12. Violin plots of 0-1 km bulk shear for RUC-2 and the reanalyses .............................. 61 13. Violin plots of SCP for RUC-2 and the reanalyses .................................................... 62 14. Violin plots of STP for RUC-2 and the reanalyses .................................................... 63 15. Average number of days during the period of 1986-2015 with 00 UTC NARR MUCAPE values exceeding 2000 J kg-1 and MLCAPE values exceeding 2000 J kg-1 ................................................................................................. 64 vii 16. Average number of days during the period of 1986-2015 with 00 UTC product of NARR MUCAPE and 0-6 km shear exceeding 20,000 ........................... 65 17. Average number of days during the period of 1986-2015 with 00 UTC NARR SCP exceeding 2 ............................................................................................ 66 18. Linear trend in days with NARR 00 UTC MLCAPE values exceeding 2000 J kg-1 for each season ........................................................................................ 67 19. Linear trend in days with NARR 00 UTC MUCAPE values exceeding 2000 J kg-1 for each season ........................................................................................ 68 20. Linear trend in days with NARR 00 UTC MLCIN values exceeding -75 J kg-1 for each season ........................................................................................... 69 21. Linear trend in days with NARR 00 UTC 0-6 km shear values exceeding 40 kts for each season ................................................................................................ 70 22. Linear trend in days with NARR 00 UTC SCP values exceeding 2 for each season ................................................................................................................. 71 23. Linear trend in days with NARR 00 UTC EFFSRH values exceeding 100 m2s2 for each season ............................................................................................ 72 24. Linear trend in days with NARR 00 UTC EBWD values exceeding 15 ms-1 for each season .............................................................................................. 73 25. Linear trend in days with MLCAPE
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Snow Modeling and Observations at NOAA's National Operational
    Snow Modeling and Observations at NOAA’S National Operational Hydrologic Remote Sensing Center Thomas R. Carroll National Operational Hydrologic Remote Sensing Center, National Weather Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Chanhassen, Minnesota, USA Abstract The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) National Operational Hydrologic Remote Sensing Center (NOHRSC) routinely ingests all of the electronically available, real-time, ground-based, snow data; airborne snow water equivalent data; satellite areal extent of snow cover information; and numerical weather prediction (NWP) model forcings for the coterminous United States. The NWP model forcings are physically downscaled from their native 13 kilometer2 (km) spatial resolution to a 1 km2 resolution for the coterminous United States. The downscaled NWP forcings drive the NOHRSC Snow Model (NSM) that includes an energy-and-mass-balance snow accumulation and ablation model run at a 1 km2 spatial resolution and at a 1 hour temporal resolution for the country. The ground-based, airborne, and satellite snow observations are assimilated into the model state variables simulated by the NSM using a Newtonian nudging technique. The principle advantages of the assimilation technique are: (1) approximate balance is maintained in the NSM, (2) physical processes are easily accommodated in the model, and (3) asynoptic data are incorporated at the appropriate times. The NSM is reinitialized with the assimilated snow observations to generate a variety of snow products that combine to form NOAA’s NOHRSC National Snow Analyses (NSA). The NOHRSC NSA incorporate all of the information necessary and available to produce a “best estimate” of real-time snow cover conditions at 1 km2 spatial resolution and 1 hour temporal resolution for the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Visibility Forecasts from the RUC20
    5.10 Visibility Forecasts from the RUC20 Tracy Lorraine Smith*, Stanley G. Benjamin, and John M. Brown NOAA Research – Forecast Systems Laboratory Boulder, CO 80305 USA *Also affliliated with the Cooperative Institue for Research in the Atmosphere * email – [email protected] 1. Introduction 2002. The primary model changes in the RUC20 include a new Grell convective parameterization, At least five characteristics of the new 20-km explicit clouds using mixed phase microphysics, Rapid Update Cycle (RUC20, Benjamin et al. an update to the RUC/MM5 Reisner level-4 2002a, this volume), being implemented at NCEP mixed-phase microphysics developed jointly by in April 2002, should contribute to improvements NCAR and FSL, and new land-surface in visibility forecasts. These include higher processes. RUC20 also assimilates GOES horizontal and vertical resolution (from 40 km to cloud-top data to assist in the description of initial 20 km, 40 to 50 levels), improved versions of the cloud/hydrometeor fields. The smaller grid size MM5/RUC mixed-phase cloud microphysics and also allows the RUC20 to resolve smaller areas RUC land-surface schemes, assimilation of of clouds and precipitation, which should benefit GOES cloud information modifying RUC 1-h visibility diagnoses. A more accurate diurnal hydrometeor forecasts (Benjamin et al. 2002b), cycle with a more frequent call to the shortwave and an improved RUC visibility algorithm radiation module should also make a minor (Smirnova et al. 2000), which was originally contribution toward diagnosis of fog/low-level based on the Stoelinga-Warner method. clouds. Ongoing 3-h verification against METAR visibility observations is being conducted for forecasts The visibility field from the RUC is output from a from both the RUC2 (called RUC40 in this paper) visibility translation algorithm that uses near- and the RUC20 to assess the impact of the surface hydrometeor (cloud water, rain water, changes.
    [Show full text]
  • A North American Hourly Assimilation and Model Forecast Cycle: the Rapid Refresh
    APRIL 2016 B E N J A M I N E T A L . 1669 A North American Hourly Assimilation and Model Forecast Cycle: The Rapid Refresh STANLEY G. BENJAMIN,STEPHEN S. WEYGANDT,JOHN M. BROWN,MING HU,* CURTIS R. ALEXANDER,* TATIANA G. SMIRNOVA,* JOSEPH B. OLSON,* ERIC P. JAMES,* 1 DAVID C. DOWELL,GEORG A. GRELL,HAIDAO LIN, STEVEN E. PECKHAM,* 1 TRACY LORRAINE SMITH, WILLIAM R. MONINGER,* AND JAYMES S. KENYON* NOAA/Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado GEOFFREY S. MANIKIN NOAA/NWS/NCEP/Environmental Modeling Center, College Park, Maryland (Manuscript received 8 July 2015, in final form 8 December 2015) ABSTRACT The Rapid Refresh (RAP), an hourly updated assimilation and model forecast system, replaced the Rapid Update Cycle (RUC) as an operational regional analysis and forecast system among the suite of models at the NOAA/National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) in 2012. The need for an effective hourly updated assimilation and modeling system for the United States for situational awareness and related decision- making has continued to increase for various applications including aviation (and transportation in general), severe weather, and energy. The RAP is distinct from the previous RUC in three primary aspects: a larger geographical domain (covering North America), use of the community-based Advanced Research version of the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model (ARW) replacing the RUC forecast model, and use of the Gridpoint Statistical Interpolation analysis system (GSI) instead of the RUC three-dimensional variational data assimilation (3DVar). As part of the RAP development, modifications have been made to the community ARW model (especially in model physics) and GSI assimilation systems, some based on previous model and assimilation design innovations developed initially with the RUC.
    [Show full text]
  • COOPERATIVE INSTITUTE for RESEARCH in ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES University of Colorado at Boulder UCB 216 Boulder, CO 80309-0216
    CELEB ra TING 0 OF ENVI R ONMENT A L RESE arc H years 4 COOPERATIVE INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH ANNU A L REPO R T IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES University of Colorado at Boulder i 00 2 8 COOPERATIVE INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES University of Colorado at Boulder UCB 216 Boulder, CO 80309-0216 Phone: 303-492-1143 Fax: 303-492-1149 email: [email protected] http://cires.colorado.edu ANNU A L REPO R T ST A FF Suzanne van Drunick, Coordinator Jennifer Gunther, Designer Katy Human, Editor COVE R PHOTO Pat and Rosemarie Keough part of traveling photographic exhibit Antarctica—Passion and Obsession Sponsored by CIRES in celebration of 40th Anniversary ii From the Director 2 Executive Summary and Research Highlights 4 The Institute Year in Review 12 Contributions to NOAA’s Strategic Vision 13 Administration and Funding 16 Creating a Dynamic Research Environment 21 CIRES People and Projects 26 Faculty Fellows Research 27 Scientific Centers 58 Education and Outreach 68 Visiting Fellows 70 Innovative Research Projects 73 Graduate Student Research Fellowships 83 Diversity and Undergraduate Research Programs 85 Theme Reports 86 Measures of Achievement: Calendar Year 2007 146 Publications by the Numbers 147 Refereed publications 148 Non-refereed Publications 172 Refereed Journals in which CIRES Scientists Published 179 Honors and Awards 181 Service 185 Appendices 188 Governance and Management 189 Personnel Demographics 193 Acronyms and Abbreviations 194 CIRES Annual Report 2008 1 From the Director 2 CIRES Annual Report 2008 am very proud to present the new CIRES annual report for fiscal year 2008. It has been another exciting year with numerous accomplishments, Iawards, and continued growth in our research staff and budget.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wind Forecast Improvement Project (WFIP) Is a U
    WFIP NOAA Final Report - Page i TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................. i Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................. 1 1. Project Overview .................................................................................................................................. 4 1.1 Goals and Key Tasks ........................................................................................................................ 4 1.2 Team Partners, Two Study Areas ....................................................................................................... 8 2. WFIP Observations ............................................................................................................................. 11 2.1 Instrumentation ............................................................................................................................ 11 2.2 Site Selection and Preparation, Leases, Data Transmission and Handling ............................................. 21 2.3 Data Quality Control and Instrument Performance ........................................................................... 22 2.3 Instrument Inter-comparisons ........................................................................................................ 31 3. NOAA Models ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NAEFS Status and Future Plan
    NAEFS Status and Future Plan Yuejian Zhu Ensemble team leader Environmental Modeling Center NCEP/NWS/NOAA Presentation for International S2S conference February 14 2014 Warnings Warnings Coordination Coordination Assessments Forecasts Guidance Forecasts Guidance Watches Watches Outlook Outlook Threats & & Alert Alert Products Forecast Lead Time Minutes Minutes Life & Property NOAA Hours Hours Aviation Days Days Spanning 1 Maritime 1 Week Week Seamless 2 Space Operations 2 Week Week Fire Weather Fire Weather Months Months Emergency Mgmt Climate/Weather/Water Commerce Suite Benefits Seasons Seasons Energy Planning Hydropower of Reservoir Control Forecast O G O O H C U D R C R D Y L T P S Agriculture I Years Years Recreation Weather Prediction Climate Prediction Ecosystem Products Health Products Uncertainty ForecastForecast Uncertainty Forecast Uncertainty Environment Warnings Warnings Coordination Coordination Assessments Forecasts Guidance Forecasts Guidance Watches Watches Outlook Outlook Threats & & Alert Alert Forecast Lead Time Products Service CenterPerspective Minutes Minutes Life & Property NOAA Hours Hours Aviation Days Days 1 1 Maritime Spanning Week Week Seamless SPC 2 Space Operations 2 Week Week Fire Weather HPC Fire Weather Months Months Emergency Mgmt AWC Climate/Weather Climate OPC Commerce Suite Linkage Benefits Seasons Seasons SWPC Energy Planning CPC TPC Hydropower of and Reservoir Control Forecast Reservoir Control Fire WeatherOutlooks toDay8 Week 2HazardsAssessment Winter WeatherDeskDays1-3 Seasonal Predictions NDFD,
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for the Preparation of Final Papers for EUMETSAT Conferences
    Proceedings for the 13th International Winds Workshop 27 June - 1 July 2016, Monterey, California, USA STATUS OF THE OPERATIONAL SATELLITE WINDS PRODUCTION AT CPTEC/INPE AND IT USAGE IN REGIONAL DATA ASSIMILATION OVER SOUTH AMERICA Renato G. Negri, Luiz F. Sapucci, Lucas Avanço, Nelson Ferreira, Luiz G. G. Gonçalves National Institute for Space Research, Center for Weather Forecasting and Climate Research, Rod. Pres. Dutra, km 40, Cachoeira Paulista, SP, 12.630-000, Brazil Abstract Tropospheric winds are estimated using satellite imagery since late 60's and today they are a very important source of information for numerical weather forecasts. The CPTEC/INPE has being producing Atmospheric Motion Vectors (AMV), operationally, since early 2000's, using GOES satellites. The typical spatial coverage is the South America and surrounding oceans covered by the GOES satellites. The wind extraction at CPTEC/INPE is done using the visible, near infrared (3.9 µm) water vapor absorption (6.7 µm) and window infrared (10.2 µm) channels. The visible and 3.9 µm are used only to estimate the low level winds for day and night only respectively, 6.7 µm allows to estimate winds at middle and high troposphere and 10.2 µm is used to estimate the wind at all tropospheric layers. This algorithm makes use of triplets of successive GOES images with at least 30 minutes between each pair, which allow having a new wind field at least half hour. The quality control applied to the wind fields is based on developed at EUMETSAT where each AMV receive a quality indicator and the final users can choose what level is more suitable to their application.
    [Show full text]
  • Eric James CIRES Associate Scientist III NOAA/ESRL, R/GSD1 325 Broadway Boulder, CO 80305-3328 Office Phone (303) 497-4278 [email protected]
    Eric James CIRES Associate Scientist III NOAA/ESRL, R/GSD1 325 Broadway Boulder, CO 80305-3328 Office Phone (303) 497-4278 [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0002-6507-4997 ResearcherID: C-7713-2015 Scopus ID: 55434490100 ________________________________________________________________________________________________ Education M.S. in Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, 2009. B.S. in Meteorology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2006. B.S. in Geography, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2006. Work Experience Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, 216 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309. Professional Research Assistant, May 2010 to present. Helped with the development, maintenance, testing of high-resolution short-range numerical weather prediction models in preparation for operational implementation. Full time. Salary $72,000. Supervisor Dr. Stan Benjamin (303) 497-6387, [email protected]. Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, 1371 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80526. Research Associate, June 2009 to April 2010. Undertook research in mesoscale meteorology, prepared related papers for publication. Full time. Salary $26,000. Supervisor Dr. Richard Johnson (970) 491-8321, [email protected]. Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University. 1371 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80526. Graduate Research Assistant, August 2006 to May 2009. Conducted thesis research in mesoscale meteorology, prepared related presentations and papers. 40 hours/week. $12.50/hour. Supervisor Dr. Richard Johnson (970) 491-8321, [email protected]. The Forge for Families. 3150 Yellowstone Blvd., Houston, TX 77054. Group Leader, June to July 2006. Supervised fund-raising car washes by inner city youth. 20 hours/week.
    [Show full text]
  • An Improved Weighting Method of Time-Lag-Ensemble Averaging for Hourly Precipitation Forecasts and Its Application in a Typhoon-Induced Heavy Rainfall Event
    atmosphere Article An Improved Weighting Method of Time-Lag-Ensemble Averaging for Hourly Precipitation Forecasts and Its Application in a Typhoon-Induced Heavy Rainfall Event Li Zhou 1,2, Lin Xu 1,2,*, Mingcai Lan 1,2 and Jingjing Chen 1,2 1 Hunan Meteorological Service, Changsha 410118, China; [email protected] (L.Z.); [email protected] (M.L.); [email protected] (J.C.) 2 Key Laboratory of Preventing and Reducing Meteorological Disaster in Hunan Province, Changsha 410118, China * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-731-8560-0016 Abstract: Heavy rainfall events often cause great societal and economic impacts. The prediction ability of traditional extrapolation techniques decreases rapidly with the increase in the lead time. Moreover, deficiencies of high-resolution numerical models and high-frequency data assimilation will increase the prediction uncertainty. To address these shortcomings, based on the hourly precipitation prediction of Global/Regional Assimilation and Prediction System-Cycle of Hourly Assimilation and Forecast (GRAPES-CHAF) and Shanghai Meteorological Service-WRF ADAS Rapid Refresh System (SMS-WARR), we present an improved weighting method of time-lag-ensemble averaging for hourly precipitation forecast which gives more weight to heavy rainfall and can quickly select the optimal ensemble members for forecasting. In addition, by using the cross-magnitude weight (CMW) Citation: Zhou, L.; Xu, L.; Lan, M.; method, mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE) and correlation coefficient Chen,
    [Show full text]
  • Tropospheric Parameter Estimation Based on GNSS Tracking Data of A
    DISSERTATION Tropospheric delay parameters derived from GNSS-tracking data of a fast-moving fleet of trains Ausgeführt zum Zwecke der Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der technischen Wissenschaften unter der Leitung von Ao.Univ.Prof. Dipl.-Ing. Dr.techn. Robert Weber am E 120-4 Department für Geodäsie und Geoinformation eingereicht an der Technischen Universität Wien Fakultät für Mathematik und Geoinformation von Matthias Aichinger-Rosenberger Matr.Nr: 00926550 Ried 14/7 6306 Söll Wien, Februar 2021 (Unterschrift Verfasser/in) (Unterschrift Betreuer/in) i “Wonach du sehnlich ausgeschaut, Es wurde dir beschieden. Du triumphierst und jubelst laut Jetzt hab ich endlich Frieden! Ach, Freundchen, rede nicht so wild, Bez¨ahme deine Zunge! Ein jeder Wunsch, wenn er erf¨ullt, Kriegtaugenblicklich Junge.” —Wilhelm Busch (1832-1908) ii Acknowledgements Theverse on the previous page, composed by thefamousGermanwriterWilhelm Busch, Ihad stumbled upon awhile agoinsomeold bookathome. From there on,I knew thatIneeded to add it to this thesis as an opening line since there’spractically no better way of describing myacademiccareer over the years. And as I’mwriting this and therebyfinish this chapter,there’s already somethingnew and exciting coming up forthe future. Nevertheless before that is nowthe time to thank everybodywho made this thesis and my PhD studies possible. First and foremost, Iwouldliketothank Prof. Robert Weber, who served as my supervisorand mentor not only forthis thesis but at allaspectsofuniversitylife. Thanks forgiving me the opportunity to jointhe research divisionand pursue such an interesting PhDstudy. Furthermore thanks to: Johannes B¨ohm,again forthe chance to start an academic career at TU Wien and forcompetent advice with his expertknowledge in atmosphericmodelling and space geodesy.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of an International Conference on Transport, Atmosphere and Climate (TAC) Oxford, United Kingdom, 26Th to 29Th June 2006
    Proceedings of an International Conference on Transport, Atmosphere and Climate (TAC) Oxford, United Kingdom, 26th to 29th June 2006 Edited by Robert Sausen, Anja Blum, David S. Lee and Claus Brüning 2 Proceedings of the TAC-Conference, June 26 to 29, 2006, Oxford, UK http://www.pa.op.dlr.de/tac/proceedings.html Edited by Robert Sausen1, Anja Blum1, David S. Lee2 and Claus Brüning3 Oberpfaffenhofen, September 2007 1 Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre, Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V., Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany 2 Dalton Research Institute, Manchester Metropolitan University, Department of Environmental and Geographical Sciences, United Kingdom 3 European Commission, DG Research, Directorate Environment, Unit 'Climate Change and Environmental Risks’, Brussels, Belgium Proceedings of the TAC-Conference, June 26 to 29, 2006, Oxford, UK 3 Foreword The "International Conference on Transport, Atmosphere and Climate (TAC)" held in Oxford (United Kingdom), 2006, was organised with the objective of updating our knowledge on the at- mospheric impacts of transport, three years after the "European Conference on Aviation, Atmos- phere and Climate (AAC)" in Friedrichshafen (Lake Constance, Germany). While the AAC conference concentrated on aviation, the scope was widened to include all modes of transport in order to allow a equitable comparison of the impacts on the atmospheric composition and on climate. In particular, the conference covered the following topics: - engine emissions (gaseous and particulate), - emission scenarios and emission
    [Show full text]
  • Assimilation of Lightning Data Using a Diabatic Digital Filter Within the Rapid Update Cycle
    Assimilation of lightning data using a diabatic digital filter within the Rapid Update Cycle Stephen S. Weygandt, Ming Hu, Stanley G. Benjamin, Tanya G. Smirnova, Kevin J. Brundage, John M. Brown NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory – Global Systems Division Boulder, CO 1. INTRODUCTION Driven by society’s need for accurate thunderstorm prediction guidance and the ever increasing capacity of supercomputers, efforts to improve the assimilation and modeling of thunderstorms have continued to accelerate over the past decade. The efforts have included improvements to the operational models (run with horizontal resolutions of order 10 km, requiring the use of cumulus paramterizations) and to experimental models (run with resolutions of 4-km or less, explicitly resolving convective storms). A key focus for these efforts has been the data assimilation systems for the mesoscale convective environment and the direct assimilation of convective-scale data. The assimilation of convective scale date has focused primarily on the use of radar data (reflectivity and radial Fig. 1. Diagram showing the horizontal domains of the velocity), but awareness of the utility of current NCEP operational 13-km hourly cycled RUC model, real-time 13-km Rapid Refresh domain currently lightning data as a supplementary data source running with a 1-h cycle at GSD (and scheduled to has been increasing within the data replace the RUC at NCEP in 2009-2010), and the assimilation community. Presently a number of experimental 3-km High Resolution Rapid Refresh efforts to assimilate lightning data are domain currently running hourly at GSD. underway. Within the NOAA Rapid-Update Cycle cover all of North America and adjacent (RUC) model assimilation system (Benjamin et waters, with a considerable portion of the al., 2004a,b), lightning data have been used in domain not covered by a radar network.
    [Show full text]