8) Let ^ be a topology for X end let A£X. The closure of A is cA and the interior of A is Int A.
9) Let *¥ be a topology for X and let ^ be a topology for Y.
Let fsX—>Y. f :(X,1^) — Y/%) w ill mean that f is continuous.
10) Let be a topology for X and let Yi. be a topology for Y.
means that (Y,^) is a subspace of (X ,^).
11) Let Y be a topology for X and let A£X. A AY will denote the relative topology on A.
12) Let fsX-^Y and let'Y be a topology for Y. is the weak topology for X induced by f and Y , v 13) Let f:X—5-Y be onto and let be a topology for X. £(?¥) the quotient topology for Y induced by f and ^ .
Ill) Let d be a pseudo-metric for X. For xeX,
Sr(x)»fyjd(x,y) 0, V£ (or Vd^£) is £(x,y) jd(x,y)<,
uniformity with base ) £ >o}.
vi INTRODUCTION
Attempts to induce natural topological and uniform structures on
the hyperspace (power set) of a set began with Hausdorff’s metric on
the closed, bounded subsets of a metric space. In the case of a uniform space the Hausdorff metric had a natural generalization which has developed into the standard hyperspace of a uniform space. (See
Caufield [ 3]•) However, in the case of a topological space, there was no natural generalization. The finite or Vietoris topology (for a
comprehensive presentation see Michael [ 13]) is one acceptable generalization since, on the closed subsets of a compact metric space, it agrees with the topology induced by the Hausdorff metric. There
are, however, other possible lines of generalization, one of which was
the starting point for this paper.
The basic idea is the following: given a topological space, apply the standard uniform construction to the neighborhoods of the
diagonal and derive a hyperspace topology as if the resulting hyper
space structure were actually a uniformity. This can be viewed as
combining the modern formulation of the Hausdorff approach to the hyperspace with Davis1 idea [6j of studying "uniform-like” structures for arbitrary topological spaces. In this paper the "uniform-like"
structures which occur are the semi-uniform spaces (loosely, uniform
spaces without the triangle axiom; see Cech [l;]). The paper has four parts: a study of serai-uniform spaces
(Chapter I), the construction of the hyperspace of a semi-uniform space (Chapter II), a study of some aspects of the hyperspace topology described above (Chapters III and IV),and a list of un answered questions and conjectures which have good potential for further research (Chapter V).
The following two points are of special interest. First of all, semi-uniform spaces with property K are introduced (section 2 of
Chapter I). In these spaces, the serai-uniformity is closely connected to the topology which it induces. For example, each entourage sectioned at any point yields a neighborhood of the point. Semi uniform spaces with property K are also closely connected to stable topological spaces (see Friedman and Metzler [.71, Davis [6] and
Naimpolly [lit]) • Secondly, there are several good theorems on pseudo-metrizability of the hyperspace and pseudo-metrizability of fine uniformities (Chapter IV). CHAPTER I
SEMI-UNIFORM SPACES
I.. 1. General Facts About Semi-Uniform Spaces.
I. 1.1 Definition. Let X be a set. A. non-empty family is called a semi-uniformity for X if and only if
a) A £ U for every U ettj
b) if U£V£ X*X and Ue'U , then V tU ;
c) if U and V e. U , then UA V eU ;
d) i f Uall , th en U~'elL „
I f il is a semi-uniformity for X, the pair (X/ti) will be called a semi-uniform space.
There are many examples of semi-uniform spaces; in particular, every uniform spa.ce is a semi-uniform space. (Clearly, a semi uniform space need not be a uniform space; many examples of this phenomenon w ill appear.)
The following theorem yields a class of examples of primary interest in this paper. •
I. 1.2 Theorem. Let (X,T) be a topological space and let be the neighborhoods of A in the product topology. Then (X,is a semi-uniform space.
Proofs since X*XeiProperties a, b and c above hold for the neighborhoods of any set. If U £ (X) and xeX, (x,x)£ O-jx O^s U fo r some 0^, . Hence,
(x,x)e OgXO^lT* and so IT's V.dt)»
From this point on, given a topological space (X ,^, °IX(1X) w ill always denote the semi-uniformity just described.
I. 1.3 Definition. Let (X,T) be a semi-uniform space and «3 and
(2> subsets of % .
a) is a subbase for ii if and only if
% = {u|/5 Si£U€X*X for some S-^...,S n £ $ } .
b) S is a base for "2t if and only if
V ~ ■[ u] B£ US X*X fo r some B e 0 j .
The next two lemmas w ill be used frequently to construct exam ples.
I. l.ii Lemma. Let X be a set. Let 2 — X*X. Then there exists a unique semi-uniformity % with subbase J? if and only if
a) A £ S f o r ev ery S £ S j
b) f o r ev ery S , 3 S^, « ..,S n £ w ith A S ^ S -1 .
Proof; The necessity of a and b is clear from the definitions of semi-uniformity and subbase. We show that a and b are sufficient. Let %= £U | A Us X*X for some S i,.. ,,Sn £ 2.J»
$ im p lies U^r C le a rly , il contains supersets of its members and is closed under finite intersections. Property a insures that
AS U for every DeU . Property b insures that S“ *£ i(. whenever
S 6% . Thus, since (A S.) = A S.”', U~,elL whenever U efy. , Thus, 1 Xsi i 11 is a semi-uniformity with subbase J . The uniqueness of follows from the definition of subbase. It is interesting to note that Kelley f10 J does not give a characterization of subbase for a uniform space.
I. 1.5 Lemma. Let X be a set. Let (&£X«X. Then there exists a unique semi-uniformity °U- with.base if and only if the following hold:
a) A £ B for every B c (S
b) for every B £. Q> , 3 B> £ /Swith Bs£ B
c) if B^ and B^e (5 ,3 B^£ CB> with B^z. B-jfi Bg.
Proof: The necessity of a, b and c-follows immediately from the definitions of semi-uniformity and base. That a, b and c are sufficient is shown as follows: Properties a and b together with the preceding lemma guarantee the existence of a unique semi-uniformity xd.th subbase(8 . Property c shows that <9 is in fact a base for1^ .
The next few definitions and theorems consist of standard uniform properties generalized to the semi-uniform case. The proofs are omitted, being exactly the same as in the case of uniform spaces.
(See Kelley [10]).
I. 1.6 Theorem. Let (XjlQ be a semi-uniform space. Then V. has a symmetric base.
I. 1.7 Theorem. Let (XfU.) be a semi-’uniform space and let Y£X
Let YxY/lW denote JlxYftuju c tt]. Then YxY A'U. is a semi-uniformity fo r Y.
I. 1.8 Definition. Let (Y,V) and (X/U) be semi-uniform spaces.
(Y,V) is a subspace of (X/U) if and only if Y^X and “V = YxY /)V.o
The notation (Y,V)£ (X,%) w ill mean that (YyY) is a subspace of (X/U)
I, 1.9 Definition. Let (XfU.) and (Y,*V) be semi-uniform spaces 6
and let f:X-*Y.
a) f is uniformly continuous if and only if Vc V implies
th at (fx'f)—1 [vj £°U . The n o ta tio n f : (X/U)-*(Y,V) w ill
mean that f is uniformly continuous.
b) f is a unimorphism if and only if f is 1-1, onto,
uniformly continuous and U cV. implies that fxf£u]cV.
I. 1.10 Theorem. Let (X3%) and (Y,V) be semi-uniform spaces;
let fsX-^Y. Then f : (X,^)-^(Y,V) if and only if, for every V£‘V,
3 such that (f*f)[u]£V.
I. 1.11 Theorem. Let (Xfii) and (Y,^) be semi-uniform spaces;
let f : (X$)-*(Y/V) b® I"-*- an<^ onto. Then f is a unimorphism if and
' only if f"1 : (Y,V)-Kx;U).
I. 1.12 Theorem. Let (X/U) be a semi-uniform space. Let
^(^) = [o^x|x£0^3 V etL with U£x]£ 0 . Then (X^CU)) is a
topological space.
From this point on, given a semi-uniform space (X/lX)y (X, ‘TX/1X))
w ill denote the topological space just constructed.
I. 1.13 Theorem. Let (X,iL) be a semi-uniform space. Then
0 £ *T(U) if and only if xeO 3 a symmetric U c'U such that
U fx ]£ 0 .
I. l.lli Theorem. Let X be a set with semi-uniformities % and
V. I f t y s V , th en (V ).
I. l.l£ Theorem. Let (X/U) and (Y,“V) be semi-uniform spaces;
l e t f : (X/U)-*( Y/V ). Then f : (X, ) )->{ Y, y;(V)). In addition, if
f is a unimorphism, f is also a homeomorphism.
Two standard uniform space theorems which fa il in the semi- uniform case are worth noting at once;
a) (Y/VOS (X#A) need not imply (Y,-T(V))^(X,''T(20).
b ) U ciL and xe.X need not imply that U[x3 is a
neighborhood of x.
Examples and a fu ll discussion of these phenomena w ill appear in
section two.
The next example shows that there need not be containment relations between a semi-uniformity H and ^ (U-)) « In particular, in the example, an entourage U^W-is not a neighborhood of A even
though UfxJ is a neighborhood of x for every x£X.
I. I«l6 Example. Let R be^the reals, let
X=-^(x,y)|-|x^y—2x and x> 0 ^ and l e t Y= |'(x ,y )J 2x^yLet B= R*{o^Uf 0p the y-axis and the points "between" the lines y = -|-x and y=2x).
Clearly, A £ B and B is not a neighborhood of (0,0) in the
usual topology on R^. Since B[0] = R, B[x3=|'yJ §x£- yf:2x^ if
x>0, and B[XI = ^yj2x^y£|'xj' if x<0, BfxJ is a neighborhood of
x for every x£R.
B = B“> is shown as follows: Let (x,y)cB.
If x=0 or y= 0, (y,x)£B. If (x,y)eX, then x> 0 and |x^y^2x which yields y> 0 and -|yt£x-£2y. Thus (y,x)e X^B. Similarly, if
(x,y)eY, (y,x)£Y.
Now l e t 'I' (x ,y )| |x -y |— € | for each C> 0 and l e t
B jk^o}-. Using A^B and B=B-1, it is easy to see that
& satisfies the requirements for a base given in Lemma 1.1.5* Thus
l e t V. be the semi-uniformity with base (8 . Let be the usual topology for R. Since j £ > Oj form a base for the usual uniformity on R, *¥ £ Let xcO g‘cT(^).
Then 3 C>0 such that (V6 H B)[x]£0. Since (VGn B)£x]=r V^x]/} B/>] and Bfx] is a ^-neighborhood of x, (Ve /I B)[x] is ^-neighborhood of x. Thus T = m > and so ‘^(■rc(‘^))= %(^)»
Since B is not a neighborhood of A , B U. s.s follows: Let Sn=^(x,y)| jx-y|<^ and x,ya[-n,nj^.
Let v==^ S n. Clearly, V£2/(^). Suppose B<=.V f o r some
0 < £ < 1. Pick n positive such that -fc < £ and pick x> n. Let y=x-*£ . Then •|x:£:ys=2x so that (x,y)£B. Also (x,y)eV£ and so
(x ,y )£ V. Hence, (x,y)£Sjq- f o r some N*^.n-»-l and so )x -y } ^ -^ -< £ .
Contradiction.
The next theorem leads naturally to the definition of stable topologies. (See Friedman and Metzler [7]j also Davis [6],)
I. 1.17 Theorem. Let (X,1^) be a topological space. Then
Proof; This holds since, for each x£X and Us^UCT), U[x] is a
“^-neighborhood of x.
I. 1.18 Corollary. Let (X,“U) be a semi-uniform space and let lL* = U('r(U )). Then
P ro o f; Take * T = ^(& ) in 1 .1 .1 7 .
I. 1.19 Definition. Let (X,^) be a topological space. (X/t') is stable if and only if lL{%))—*¥ .
The next theorem contains several interesting characterizations of stable topological spaces. The theorem is in part due to Friedman and Metzler (a<^e belowj [7])* in part to Davis (b^ej [6j), and in part to Levine (c<^e). I give a proof here for the sake of
convenience.
I, 1.20 Theorem. Let (X/^T) be a topological space. Then
the following are equivalent:
a) (X,^ is stable
b) for every xeX, c{x}= r\ -[UL'xjju £ c) f o r ev ery x,y<5"X, y e c{xj=^x d) for every xeX, c^x^ — f] fojx eO e.1^ 1
e) for every xcOe'T, cfxj^O
P ro o f: (a=^b) L et ye cfxl and Let V<£ be
symmetric with V£U. VfyQ is a neighborhood of y and so xeYCyl.
Thus y e V£xJ £U[x]. Now let y £ f\ [uCxjj U£ If y e 0 e fT t
3 U £ tHC£) with U symmetric and U[yj£0. Since y£U[x], x £-Ufyj£E 0.
Thus y e c^xj.
(b^c) Let x,y£X with y& c{x}. Let U £ Vi*?)* Choose with V symmetric and V£U. Since V[yJ is a neighborhood of y,
V£y]£U[y]. Thus x £ A{ufxl|u£ 2Z(^)l=cfy?.
(c=?d) Let yecifx? and let xe O e^. If y^CO, cfy^C o which is impossible since xecfyj. Thus yeO. Let y£/^ojxe 0 e
Then xecfy] and so yec£x^.
(d=^e) Clear.
(e=j>a) By 1 .1 .1 7 , i t i s n ecessary to show on ly - ‘ti t l d ’Z)) •
Let xeO g'T. Let U=-0*0 U £c[x$ x (?c{xj. Then, since c{x^S0,
U £41(2 ). Clearly, Upx] S 0.
I. 1.21 Definition. Let (X/t) be a topological space. (X,^) is semi-uniformizable if and only if 3 a semi-uniformity ‘U. for X with 10
I. 1.22 Theorem. Every stable topological space is semi- uniformizable.
Proof: This is immediate from the definition and 1.1.2.
The next two examples show that the converse of 1.1.22 is false and that not every topological space is semi-uniformizable. A characterization of semi-uniformizable spaces appears later in this s e c tio n .
I. 1.23 Lemma. Let (X/T) be a topological space. For
■x.e.Q&'Y, let S ^ 0= 0x0 U C2£x5 and let J5 = -^Sx^q|x£0<£
Then a) is a subbase for a semi-uniformity U.
b)
Proof: Each Sx^q contains A since x eO. Clearly, each Sx^q is symmetric. Thus, b y l.l.lj, i is a subbase for some semi uniformity U . L et x eO Then Sx q [x ] = 0. Thus 0 £ ^(H) and
L e v i t t ) - I. 1.2li Lemma. Let (X/7) be a topological space. Let xl,..*,xn£ X and xi€®i each i. Let Sv. n. be as in 1.1.23. Let x a) /~\ S„ Q [x]= 0-F where and FS{x->, .. .,x ^ /t x i } i b) x ^ F if and only if x^O.^.
Proof: For each i, 0^ i f x = x ^
X i f x £ 0. and x^ix. SX i,0i [ ^ x x i f x ^ 0j_
Let F be the set of x^ such that S^q.LX] ~ 9 (^his yields "b11 im m ed iately .) Let 0 — A q^L^I | Then it is clear that I. 1.25 Example« Let X be infinite and let A be a proper infinite subset of X. Let or A ^o}. For any x£ A, c(£x})-=X. Then xt'A e'T but c(fx})^A. Thus (X/T) is not stable.
Now l e t U. be the semi-uniformity constructed in 1.1.23. It is sufficient to show that <> Let x eO f^ ). There exist
X p...,xn<= X and Op ...,0 n£ ^ such that/1 SXijOiLxJ^°* By I.1.2I;
3. 0* £ 15 such that 0*-F£0 where x^£ F<=^? x
F is finite, there exists ye A /0. Then there are m x and °l s u c h that /3 ^jO iTyJ-0* fiy i «i »^ 3 O’c such that yeO’-F'SlO where y^e F'^y^O |. Since ye A and each OjN£jzf, clearly F' = ^. Since O1^ ^ , A<=.O's.0. Thus Oe1/.
I. 1.26 Example. Let X — {a,b}; let {V, fa^,x|. (X/£) is not semi-uniformizable: Deny. Then there exists a semi-uniformity
*U such that :u) = T - Let V = /l{ u } u e %/j . V is symmetric and Ve2l.
Since {a'le'Y, V[a] = f a j , Since j[b3 4 ^ t V[b]=^a,b}. But then
V[a3 = J a ,b J • C o n tra d ic tio n .
I. 1.27 Definition. Let (X/ti) be a semi-uniform space. For each Ae X, le t k(A)-= £xju [x]/lA^=^ Vu clV.'}, The operator k will be called the weak closure associated with °li .
From this point on, given a semi-uniform space (X,^0, "k" w ill denote the weak closure associated with and "c" will denote the clo su re in th e to p ology 'VC 11)* As later examples will show, these operators may be different.
I. 1.28 Theorem. Let (X,fy.) be a semi-uniform space. Let A, 12
b) A £k(A )
c) if AsB; then k(A)^k(B)
d) k(AUB)=k(A)l/k(B)
e) k(A)gc(A)
Proof: a) Clear.
b) Let a eA® Since A £. U for every U e^JL , a e UCaJA A
for every TK'U . Thus aek(A).
c) Suppose A<£B and xek(A). For every
UelL ,jif^Utx]AAc{J[x]AB. Thusxek(B).
d) By (c), k(A)Uk(B)^k(AUB). Let xe k(AUB). If
x f k(A)Uk(B), 3 U e such that U(_x3A A= and
3 V ell such that V[x]/)B = Then
(U/1V)[xJA(AUB)=^ contradicting xek(AUB). Thus
x £ k(A)t>k(B).
e) Let xek(A) and let xe 0 6 Then 3 U € V. such
that U£xO£0. Since U fxJ/lA ^, then O/lA^k^. Thus
x e c(A ).
I. 1.29 Theorem. Let (X,^.) be a semi-uniform space and let
ASX. Then k(A) = A fuj>] )u£^^.
Proof: Let xek(A) and let V eil . There exists a symmetric
V e°U. such that VSU. Since Y[x]/"| A,£^, 3 aaA such that (x,a)e V.
Then (a,x)eV£U so that xeU[A]. Let xe /3 [u[A]\u , l e t U e U and l e t VellU. be symmetric with V£U. Since x
I. 1.30 Theorem. Let (X,K.) be a semi-uniform space and let
F£X. Then F is closed in (X,^(^)) if and only if k(F)-Fe Proofs Suppose F is closed. Then, using 1.1.28,
F£k(F)£c(F)nF.
Now let k(F)=rF and let x cCF, By 1.1.29, 3 a symmetric
U such that x^UfF]. Then U(XJ<^£F. Thus £F and F is
c lo se d .
The next few lemmas lead to a characterization of the semi-
uniformizable topological spaces.
I. 1.31 Lemma. Let (X/U) be a semi-uniform space. Then, for
every x eX, k{x} £ C\ { o jx £ 0 &
Proofs Let xtXj let xtO e-^ ) . Then there exists Ve'U such
t h a t V[x]Q0» Since k[x} = f\ [u[x] )u G-ilu } s k{x}G V(.'xJ^ 0.
I. 1.32 Definition. Let (X,1^) be a topological space. Let
-[A^xtX^be a family of subsets of X. ^A^xe X? is an open-
determining family provided that the following holds s 0* Q,*X. i f and
only if x£ 0* implies 3 0 £ and a finite subset F£X such that
xeO-FgO^.and x^Ay for every y^F.
While the last definition is unusual, the next lemma shows that
open-determining families arise naturally in semi-uniformizable
topological spaces.
I. 1.33 Lemma. Let (X,“U) be a semi-uniform space. For each
xeX, let Ax=-kfx}. Then ^A ^xeX ^is an open-determining family for
(X,W)).
Proof: Let 0 € 't (i(). For each xeO, let F=^. Then xeO-PsO
and yaF implies x^A • Let 0*^X and suppose xeO* implies 3 y •8* / and a finite subset F£X such that xc 0-F£0 and xf A for every , U = ( /ifU y/y £F^)/^Uo0 Since this intersection is finite, UfeK.
Then U£xj£ 0-F£0*. Thus 0 *6^ (U),
I. l»3h Lemma. Let (X/O be a topological space; let Proof; By 1.1.23, it is only necessary to show that *T (^0.
L et 0* G ^(U) and let xeO*. Then 3 x^, o ..,^£ X and 0]_, ...,0 such that A Sx^i0j>CxD -0^• By 1.1.21;, A SXij0^[xlrrO-F where
0 G°t and F is a finite subset o ff1 x^, ...,x ^ . Moreover, by 1.1.21;,
Xj_£F if and only if x^O^. Thus, since A^cO^ for each i, x^^e F implies x^A ^. By the defining property of an open- determining family,
I. 1.3^ Theorem. Let (X,^) be a topological space. Then (X,^) is semi-uniformizable if and only if there exists an open-determining family { x £ X^ such that Ax^a£o)x£ O e 't'l for each xeX.
Proof; 1.1.31; shows the sufficiency of the condition. On the other hand, if V is a semi-uniformity such that ‘TCV )='*£', let
Ax=kfx£. The remainder of the theorem now follows from 1.1.33 and 1.1.31.
I. I.36 Corollary. Let (X/t) be a topological space and let it be the semi-uniformity as in 1.1.23. Then (X,°£) is semi- uniformizable if and only if CX.~CZ(ti).
P ro o f; Assume (X/<0 i s sem i-uniform izable and l e t °li* be a 15
semi-uniformity which generates 'T „ For each x, let Ax— k*{x]' 0
Then, applying 1.1.31* 1*1.33 and I.1.3U* — ‘Tfyi) • The converse i s
c le a r .
I. 1.37 Corollary. Let (X^T) be a semi-uniformizable
topological space. Let ^eX . If A*[o|xoe 0 is finite, then
A - f o ) x 0e 0 Proof; Let F*= A{o|xq£0 e and let 0^= C A By 1.1.31;,
3 an open-determining family { A IxeX^with A Q /^loJx e 0£ ^ fo r "■ X each x. Since F* is finite, F* — xQ,x^,...,xn . Let ye 0*. Then
ye. X-{xQ,X p.. .,Xh] = 0* and, since A^S. F* for each i, y^ Ax^ for each i. Thus 0* .
I. 1.38 Corollary. Let (X/^) be a topological space with X
finite. Then (X/*) is semi-uniformizable if and only if (X/V) is
s ta b l e .
Proof; This immediate from 1.1.22, 1.1.37 and I.1.20e.
It is interesting to note that this last fact becomes false if
"compact" replaces "finite". An example w ill appear later.
The next example shows that a family { A^ x e X^ as in 1.1.35 need not arise via the weak closure of some semi-uniformity.
I. 1.39 Example. Let X be infinite and let A be a proper infinite subset of X. Let *'T-=£o|0 or ASO^. For each xeX, let
Ax= A. Clearly, A^c H {o |x £ 0 £ T 1 for every x. is an
open-determining family for ^ as follows; Let xeO eT . Taking
F = ^, xeO-FsO and ye F implies x^A . Now let X and suppose that xe 0* implies 3 a finite set F and 0 such that xeO -F irO * and x ^A y f o r each y e F . Assume 0 * ^ and let x£ 0#, There exist 0 C°X and a finite set F such that XG.O-FSO* and x^Ay for each yeF. Since A£0 and F is finite, there exists zeA/10# and, for z, there exist O’ and F* finite such that zcO'-F'sO* and zNow l e t %i be any semi-uniformity with . For any x^A, since fx^ is closed, k( jx |)—fx^. For such x, k(^xj )f\ A^=- $<,
I . 2. Semi-Uniform Spaces With Property K.
The example which opens this section shows that three basic uniform space theorems fail in the more general context of semi uniform spaces.
I. 2.1 Example. Let X={1,2,3} «
Let B= AL/{(1,2), (2,1), (2,3), (3,2)|o By 1.1.5, 3 a semi uniformity 2^1 with base B .
a) k(k jl3)^k{l}. (Thus k is not the closure operator
in (X,Y(«0)0 By 1.1.29, k[l}= B[l] ={l,2] and k£l,2l=Bfl,2l]=fl,2,3l.
b) Let T={l,3l and let V = Y*YAU . (Y,^CV)) is not
a subspace of (X ,^(^)): Since B[l]—{1,2},
B[2]= fl,2,3} and B [3]-{2, 3}, it is clear that
Moreover, Bf\Y*Y — Ay so that -fAyl is
a base for V . Thus, (Y,^CV)) is discrete.
c) B[l] is not a neighborhood of 1: As above,
^(20={^,x} and B[l]={l,2}.
This last example, together with 1.1.28, shows that, if k is a weak closure associated with some semi-uniformity, k satisfies 17 all the properties used by Kuratowski to characterize topological closures except (perhaps) k(k(A))= k(A)» This leads naturally to the next definition,
I. 2.2 Definition. Let (X,V.) be a semi-uniform space. (X,%) has property K if and only if k(k(A))=k(A) for every ASX.
I. 2.3 Theorem. Let (X}U) be a semi-uniform space. Then (X,U) has property K if and only if for every ASX, k(A) = c(A).
Proof; Suppose (X,%) has property K and let AsX. By I.1.28,
ASk(A)£c(A). Since k(k(A))= k(A), k (A) is closed by 1.1.30.
Thus c(A)£k(A). Suppose now that k(A) = c(A) for every ASX. Then k(k(A))=c(c(A))=c(A) = k(A) for every ASX.
I . 2,h Theorem. Let (X,U.) be a semi-uniform space. Then (X,U) has property K if and only if UCxJ is a neighborhood of x for each x£X and each U e% .
Proof; Let (X,&) have property K, let U <£ *U and let xeX.
Let A = CU[x7. Then, since x^k(A)=c(A). Thus x e. (5cA^U(V]. On the other hand, suppose U[x] is a neighborhood of x for every x £X and every U e il, Let ASX. By 1.1.28, k(A)*== c(A).
Let xccA. For every Ue'R, U£xJ a neighborhood of x so that
Thus xek(A).
I. 2.^ Corollary. Let (X/U.) be a semi-uniform space. Then
(X,U) has property K if and only if, for every ASX,
Int A= j'xj U[x]SA for some UcttJ •
Proof; Suppose Int A=|x)u£x3SA for some U e ■a? holds for every ASX. Then, given U and xe X, x e l n t U£xJ. Thus (X,^) has property K. Now suppose (XstQ has property K and let ASX. For any 18 xGlnt A, 3 U such that U[x]^Int ASA. Thus
I n t A£=|x ]u [xlI£LA for some U If U[x]I. 2,6 Corollary. Let (X/fc*) be a stable topological space.
Then (X, ^(^)) has property K.
Proof; Since *£( %.&))■=*£ and U.M is the set of neighborhoods of A , clearly Ufx] is a neighborhood of x for every xeX and Ue % ? £ ).
The last corollary im plicitly contains the fact that a semi uniformity with property K need not be a uniformity.
I. 2.7 Example. Let %L be the semi-uniformity for R constructed in I.1.16. Recall that V. has a base of the form
[v £ A B |t>0 and that Va [ x] and BtX^are -neighborhoods of x for each x and each £ ?0 . Thus, applying 1.2.It and the fact that
(V£ A B)[x}= [ x j AB [x ], (R,%) is a semi-uniform space with property K. However, as was shown in 1.1.16, and
^i')) ^.°ii o In particular a semi-uniformity with property K is not necessarily a subset of the neighborhoods of A .
I. 2.8 Example. Let Xsjajb^ and let >[a}, X^. Then t ( =|xxXjL Thus (X/T) is not stable and (X, WX)) has property K.
I. 2.9 Example. Let Xs-^ajb,^ and let
^=^,-[a^,^a,b}, fa,c]r, X^. has base /B^ where
B- fa,b}x^a,b} L>-[a,c}x ^a,c£ . B[c3 = ^a,c^ and B [a]-^a,b,c^ so that k(k/c5)^kjc5. Thus (XfllCt)) does not have property K.
I. 2.10 Theorem. Let (X/£) be a topological space. Then
(X/fc) is stable if and only if there exists a semi-uniform space ^ 19 w ith p r o p e r ty K such that rT(‘k)~ ^ .
Proof: The necessity of the condition follows from the
definition of stable and 1.2.6. Now let %L be. a sem i-u n ifo rm ity w ith property K such that . By 1.1.31# for each xeX,
c^'x^kfxI^/O l'oJxeO e'T j. Thus (X/fc“) is stable by I.1.20e.
The next few results concern subspaces; in particular, the subspace difficulties pointed out in 1.2.1 disappear in the context of semi-uniform spaces with property K.
I. 2.11 Lemma. Let (Y,V)£~ (X,?0 be semi-uniform spaces. Then
(A) Y/1 (A) for every AS Y.
P ro o f: For A s Y, y e k y (A)^>y£ Y and (Y*Yft U)[$Afor ev ery
U C.V.
^ y £ Y and U£y]A A£ for every U 6 'U
^yeY /lku(A)
I. 2.12 Theorem. Let (Y,^)^ (X,U) be semi-uniform spaces. Let
(X,%) have property X. Then has property K.
Proofs Let A«E Y. Then, using 1.1.28 and 1.2.11,
kv (A )^k^(kv (A))= kv (Y/}k^ (A))
= YAk^(YAky(A))
£ Yf>k^(Y)Ak^ (ku (A))
~ YAku (A)=k^(A)
Thus ( Y,V) has p ro p e rty K.
I. 2.13 Theorem. Let (X/U) be a semi-uniform space and let
Y £X . Then YrfC(U) £ ^ (Y * Y A U ) .
Proof: Let ycO’e Y C\T(U)9 Then 0*=YA0 for some O ^fcO .
Thus there exists Ue ‘Us U£yl so o'e^CYxY^U). I. 2.llj Theorem,, let (X,tO be a semi-uniform space and let
Y£X; let V= YxYr\U o Then (YS^CV))£(X,^C&)) if and only if
A—YAk^ (A) implies A=YA c^(A ).
Proof: Suppose ‘T (V) = X AT(fy) and let A=YAk^(A). Then
A£Y and k^ (A)= Y/l lc^ (A)^ A. Hence, by I d .30, A is closed
relative to <^'(ty)s= Y so that there exists F closed in
(U) such that A= YAF. Then c^(A )e.F and so A«=LYA c^(A)£ YAF=A®
Now suppose A-YA k^(A) implies At;YAc.^(A) and le t A be closed in
^ (y ). Then A= k^y (A) =rYnkcy (A) so that A=YftC^(A)« Thus A is
closed in Y (2i) and so ^ (V)<^ Y/A *^(20 • Thus, u sin g 1 .2 .1 3 ,
(Y,r(V))e(X,'T(^)).
I. 2.15 Corollary. Let (X,“iO be a semi-uniform space and let
YSSX be closed in (X,^(&)). Let V= YdTVU . Then
(Y ,w ))s(x,ra»- Proof: Let A=YAk(A). Then A^Y and so k(A)sk(Y)=Y. Thus
k(A) = A and A = YAc(A). By 1.2.11; (Y,^*CV))^(X,-T(^)).
I. 2.16 Theorem. Let (X,%) be a semi-uniform space. Then (X,%)
has property K if and only if (Y,^(YxY/lfy.))£- (X,*^^)) for every
YSX.
P ro o f: Suppose (X,V) has property K, le t Y<= X and let
A-=YAk^(A). Then by 1.2.3 A^YAc^A) so that
(Y, ^(YxY/1^ )) Sr(X,AT(£0). Now suppose that
• (Y,^'(YxYn^))c(x,^(‘^)) for every YSX. Let A<=X and let
Y= X-(k^(A)-A). Clearly, A = YAk^(A) so that, by 1.2.11;,
A=YAc^(A). Let xec^(A), If x^k^(A), then x£Y by the 21
definition of Y. But then x g YPI c^ (A)= A£k^(A). Thus
k «^(A)=: c ^ ( A ) and so (X,fy) has p ro p e rty K.
The next theorem contains a property which can be considered as
a weakening of the triangle inequality for semi-uniform spaces with
property K.
I. 2.17 Theorem, Let (X,fy) be a semi-uniform space. Then
(1M) has property K if and only if for .every U and xe X3 VelA.
such that yt£V(x] implies 3 Uy£% with Uy£y]c U£x]o
Proofi The condition is shown to be sufficient as follows: let
ASX and let xtk(k(A))« Suppose 3 U £*U such that U[x]r\A=^. Let
MeK be such that yeV£x} implies 3 Uy£ ‘U. with Uy[y3£U/XJ. Thus
y e V£.x] im p lies Uy[yj/) A= ^ so th a t Vfxlfl k (A )= ^ . But th is
contradicts x£k(k(A)). Thus k(k(A))=k(A) and so (X/U) has property
K. Now suppose (X,^) has property K, Let Ue'U and xeX, Since
UCx] is a neighborhood of x, 3 0 such that xeO£U£x]. Then
3 V such that V[x]€0, For each yeVfusf y6 0 so that 3 Uy£% w ith Uy[y3& 0 £UCx3 .
The next example points out a significant difference between
uniform spaces and semi-uniform spaces with property K: there may be
several semi-uniformities with property K which generate a given
compact, stable topological space. As a result, f:(X/£'(20)'-*(X/fctV)) with (X,*T(«0) compact need not imply f:(X,'20-»(Y,'V) for semi-uniform
/ spaces with property K.
I. 2.18 Example. Let (R,U) be the semi-uniform space
constructed in 1.1.16. By 1.1.16, (ii) is the usual topology for R
and by 1.2.7 (Rj^O has property K. Let X= [0 ,lj and let °V — X*Xf)lL . 22
By 1.2*12 (X,Y) has property K and by 1.2.16 ^ (V) is the usual topology for [0,l]. Recall that B (consisting of the x-axis, the y-axis and the points between the lines y=ijx and y=2x) is an entourage in °li • Then clearly XxXAB is not a neighborhood of (0,0) and so V is not the usual uniformity for X.
The next few results point out some situations in which uniformly continuous maps preserve property K.
I. 2.19 Example. Let (X,y) be a semi-uniform space without property K. Let V— {'xxxj and let Y/ be all supersets of A . Let
IsX-S-X be the identity map. Then I:(X/U)—»(X/V) since and
I:(X,V)-»(X/U) since . Both (X/V) and (X,V) have property K while (X,*U) does not*
It is worth summarizing the last example as follows? Let f: (X,fy)-? (Y/Y) be 1-1 and onto. Then (Xyfr) may have K without (Y£V) having K and (Y/V) may have X without (X/U) having K.
I. 2.20 Theorem. Let (X/K) and (Y/V) be semi-uniform spaces and l e t f : (X/U)~*( Y/y) be onto. Suppose that f is open relative to
(U) and‘T(V) and that (X,U) has property K. Then (Y,i/) has p ro p e rty K.
Proof: Let V ey and yeY. Then 3 xeX such that f(x) = y.
Let U=(f*f )“*!>]. Since (X/R) has K, a 0 such that x £ OSUCxl. Then y=f(x)e f[0] £ f[utxi] • Since f is open it is sufficient to show that ffutx]]^ Vfy]. Let y‘e f^UtxQj . Then
3 x'fcUJx] such that yft=f(x'). Then (x,x')eU and so
(f(x),f(x‘))= (y,y')£V. Thus y*£ Vfy],
I. 2.21 Corollary. Let (X/U.) and (Y,V) be semi-uniform spaces 23 and le t fs (X^)-^(Y/V) be a unimorphism. Then (X,*W) has property K if and only if (Y/y) has K.
Proof; Using 1.1.15, both f and f '* are uniformly continuous, open and onto. Thus the result follows immediately from 1.2.20.
I. 2.22 Lemma. Let (X/U.) and (Y//) be semi-uniform spaces and let f :(X,fy.)-*(Y/V). Then f[k ^ (A)] £ k^ (f[A]) for every ASX.
Proof; Let y£f jk^(A)J and let Ve V • There exists x£k<^(A) such that y=f(x). Let U= (f^f)-1 [vj. Then U[x3flAjfc^ since x£k^(A ). Let aaUCxjflA. Then (x,a)aU so that
(f(x),f(a))= (y,f(a))<£ V. Thus f(a) e VCyJ/1 ffAl and so y ck v (ilA]).
I. 2.2 3 Theorem. Let (X/U) and (Y,V) be semi-uniform spaces and let fs(X/H)-*(Y/V) be onto. Suppose that f is closed relative to
(X,T(2t)) and (Y,0f CV)) and that (X/U.) has property K. Then (Y,V) has property K.
Proof; Let AS X. Then k^(A) is closed and so f[k^(A)J is closed. Thus, since f[A ]£f[k^(A )], k1.2.21 f [k^ (A)|= key (f[A] ). Now let BsY and le t A=f~f[B], Then f [aQ — B and f[k ^ (A )|- k.ki/(k1/(B ))=kv (f[k%(A)]') = f[k%k(Y,V) has property K.
I. 2.20 and I. 2.23 naturally suggest the following question:
I f f : (X,ii)-^(Yf/ ) , f : ( X , (1t))~^(Ys