Iconographic Rendering of the Notion of Purification in two Elements Included in the Vignettes of Chapters 17 and 125 of the Book of the Dead Lucía DÍAZ-IGLESIAS LLANOS

The paper seeks to analyse the components of the group placed on the ceiling of the Hall of Judgment as well as the formal and essential relationship of this group with the scene of the Herakleopolitan lakes in BD 17. This analysis will be the basis for suggesting how some ancient Egyptian iconographic representations were subjected to a process of iconographic convergence. A similar image, adapted to the specificities of each context (negative confession and judgment after death; bathing in local ponds), was used to convey the same purpose: the rebirth of the deceased and his/her transformation into a divine being.

Representación Iconográfica de la noción de purificación en dos elementos incluidos en las viñetas de las recitaciones 17 y 125 del Libro de la Salida al Día El presente trabajo busca analizar los componentes de un grupo ubicado en el techo de la sala donde se celebra el juicio final y la relación de forma y contenido entre este grupo y la escena de los lagos heracleopolitanos incluida en LdSD 17. Este análisis será la base para sugerir cómo las representaciones pictóricas de los antiguos egipcios experimentaron un proceso de convergencia iconográfica. En virtud de este proceso una imagen similar, adaptada a las especificidades de cada contexto (confesión negativa y juicio postmortem; baño en los estanques locales) se usó para transmitir la misma idea: el renacimiento del finado y su transformación en un ser divino.

Keywords: Book of the Dead, justification, purification, iconographic convergence. Palabras clave: Libro de los Muertos, justificación, purificación, convergencia iconográfica.

This study is dedicated to Covadonga Sevilla, whose passion for Egyptology went hand-in-hand with her humility, and with her empathy and kindness towards her students. My memories of Cova bring painful yet joyful feelings, because of her too early departure and the wonderful times spent together in- and outside the classroom. This third and final article closes a triad centred on the Herakleopolitan lakes, the others of which were published in this journal (Díaz- Iglesias Llanos 2005, 2009), to which she devoted effort and care. I hope she will enjoy reading it in the Fields of Reeds.

..ancient Egypt, the notion or state of achievement of the former. In this sense, it is In ..purity1 and the physical act of clean- signi­ficant that the Egyptian word for pure ing by means of water, were strongly relat- (wab) was rendered with hieroglyphs that ed, to the point that in many texts the execu- represent water jars ( , ). There is also a tion of the latter became a metaphor for the close conceptual link between purification by

1 For purity in Egypt, see Meeks 1979 and, more recently, Quack 2013.

TdE 8 (2017) - Paginas: 117 - 162 Recepción: 22/11/2017 - Admisión: 5/1/2018 Lucía Díaz-Iglesias Llanos — [email protected] Instituto de Lenguas y Culturas del Mediterráneo y Oriente Próximo / Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas / Madrid http://doi.org/10.25145/j.TdE.2017.08.05

117 TdE82017 Iconographic Rendering of the Notion of Purification ...Lucía Díaz-Iglesias Llanos means of water and justification before a tri- maturity, and fertility, and should be taken­ bunal, the outcome of the trial being the emer- as personifications of the local pools (fig. 3). gence of a sinless and pure being. This link is They are shown standing or kneeling and per- expressed verbally in different types of fune­ form ritual acts (predominantly of protec- rary compositions, and iconographically in a tion) over two rectangular pools and a feath­ scene inserted in the vignette accompanying e­red eye, which is typically contained within Book of the Dead (hereafter BD) spell 125.2 an oval. This type of eye is used as a logogram The scene bears a close resemblance to the for the word jmAxw, and appears to stand as a ima­ge of the Herakleopolitan lakes depicted symbol for the resurrected deceased, who is in BD 17,3 a similarity upon which several re- worthy of veneration and is equated with the searchers have already drawn comparisons.4 sun-god Atum-Re. However, no attempt has hitherto been made The similarity in characters, attitudes, and Figure 1: The figure between the eyes crowns a chapel-like structure where the negative confession takes place. pLondon BM EA 10471 (after Faulkner et al. 2000: Pls. 28–29). to explore in depth this resemblance and its complements to the action in these elements wider implications. of the vignettes of BD 125 and 17 is not inci- The scene in BD 125 is central to a frieze dental, but rather indicates the existence of dered: location, type of figure, attitude (stand- like structure, the ceiling of which received an adorning the ceiling of a building where a relationship between the scenes. This rela- ing or kneeling and gesture executed with the elaborate frieze from the reigns of Thutmose judge­s listen to the negative confession uttered tionship rests on a convergence between the hands), and typology of accompanying ob- III/Amenhotep II onward.7 The earliest ex- by the deceased, and/or attend the weighing iconographic rendering of the status of purity jects. In total, there are ninety-three examples amples of the figure, which was placed in the of his or her heart (figs. 1, 2, 8). Despite the that the deceased has reached, either through of this scene, distributed among tombs, papy- middle of the frieze crowning this building, existence of small variations which will be ex- bathing in the Herakleopolitan lakes or by de- ri, coffins, and mummy shrouds, and the num- date to the Eighteenth Dynasty, and are relat- plored in Section 1, the central element of the nying having committed faults (the so-called ber of attestations increased over time as the ed to the negative confession. However, from group is a single kneeling male figure whose negative confession). Book of the Dead tradition developed.5 the Late Period onwards, the figure presides arms are extended in opposite directions. His I will begin by analysing the elements com- over the frieze of the hall where the weighing palms are generally turned down in a gesture prising the scene on the frieze of BD 125 and of the heart, or Judgement after Death (here- of protection over two eyes. The typology of reviewing any chronological or local modifi- 1. Iconographic analysis of the scene: after JaD), is enacted before Ra, Harakhthy, the latter exhibits some changes and they are cations. Their meaning will then be explored, location, components, variations Osiris, or the two Maat goddesses. In Late Pe- generally placed in ovals. This paper seeks to and a formal link that highlights both simi­ riod and Ptolemaic examples, the psychostasia analyse whether these small variations are sig- larities to and differences from the scene in- Spell BD 1256 is attested in some of the ear- takes pride of place in vignettes related to BD nificant in terms of chronology, local trends, serted in BD 17 will be tackled. Finally, I will liest examples of the new funerary corpus, and 125, and the forty-two juries are often incorpo- workshops, or the evolving meaning of the suggest an explanation for this association, the text was very soon accompanied by pic- rated into the scene, being placed in rows over scene. drawing attention to the conceptual connec- torial elements. Since the time of Hatshep- the scales where the heart is balanced against The scene illustrating the purification of the tion between the two mythological episodes sut/Thutmose III, the so-called negative con- a maat feather/goddess.8 The only known ex- deceased in the Herakleopolitan lakes in BD that underlie the two different acts of puri- fession recited by the deceased before forty- ample of the Twenty-fifth Dynasty (see table 5) 17 is, in general terms, composed of two indi- fication. An appendix includes a series of ta- two judges could be staged inside a chapel- follows the dominant model of the New King- viduals portrayed as male fecundity figures, bles upon which my assessment of the scene which represent the notions of abundance, in BD 125 is based. Several features are consi­

5 A greater number of attestations must have existed, but many manuscripts have come down to us in a poor state of preservation, so that parts of the decorated surface are lost. 2 The most thorough study of the vignettes of BD 125 was undertaken by Seeber 1976. See also Munro 1988: 105–114 6 The bibliography related to this spell is wide-ranging. A compilation of references can be found in Backes et al. and Milde 1991: 84–92. 20092: 185–195. The vignettes of this chapter have been dealt with by Seeber 1976; Saleh 1984: 63–71; Milde 1991: 3 For the formal aspect of this scene and the meaning of its components, see Díaz-Iglesias Llanos 2005, 2014: 244–270 84–92. (a revised and updated version of the previous article). 7 Munro 1988: 105–108. 4 Piankoff and Rambova 1957: 100, n. 8; Thausing and Goedicke 1971: 41; Seeber 1976: 65–66; Zivie 1979: 80–81, n. 8 Seeber’s type E, in which BD 125 B and the weighing of the heart are brought together in the same building, is (8); Baines 1985: 382, aa; Milde 1991: 53. attested from the Twenty-second/Twenty-fifth Dynasty onward, see Seeber 1976: 15, 48–49, 64, 138, Abb. 23–27.

118 119 TdE82017 Iconographic Rendering of the Notion of Purification ...Lucía Díaz-Iglesias Llanos dom and Third Intermediate Period recen- of the former. There are two exceptions to the sions, so that the revision of the scene should preva­lence of males. The first is the Rames­ have taken place during the Late Period. side pLondon BM EA 10470, where a male fe- In both cases, whether situated above the cundity figure is depicted (fig. 5). Although negative confession or the JaD scene, the figure the character lacks the swollen belly or over- occupies the axis of a frieze composed of maat sized breasts generally seen of such figures, feathers ( ) and uraei ( ), interspersed with he wears a short kilt and belt, and his body is braziers ( ) in the Late Period, and occasion- blue, which are typical for fecundity figures ally accompanied by baboons ( ) and scales (Type 1 in the tables). The second exception is ( ) that were placed in the corners (figs. 2, 8). in the Ptolemaic M. Princeton pharaonic roll None of these elements can be used as dating No 8, where a woman is included. The round- criteria,9 although they convey specific mean- ed breasts and belly, and the tight-fitting dress ings within the vignette that will be discussed displayed by the figure, correspond to -a fe below. As reflected in the appendix, only in male character (Type 4). two documents⎯(QV 66 of the New Kingdom, The protagonist of the scene is oriented to- and pCairo CG 40017 of the Third Intermedi- ward the right, following the direction faced Figure 2: The figure between the eyes crowns a chapel-like structure where the weighing of the heart is featured. pTurin 1791 ate Period)⎯does the figure not crown a cha- by the forty-two judges and the magistrate (after Lepsius Tb. Taf. L). pel-like structure. Despite being quite the ex- that heads the post-mortem tribunal. All of ception to the rule, the figure between the eyes these figures confront the deceased as he or in these two examples is still related to the idea she enters the broad hall where the judgement kle bands) or the wig were frequently omitted. appendix, during the New Kingdom wigs fre- of judgement by its context and accompanying takes place. Although Third Intermediate Peri- Wigs occasionally display some embellish- quently display blue, black, or green hues that images.10 od manuscripts display the opposite arrange- ments in the form of solar discs (pBerlin 3150 befit divine beings, and highlight the concepts The leading figure of the scene11 is, in most ment, with the male between the eyes facing A-D),13 bands (pLondon BM EA 10043, pLon- of life and rebirth. In Ptolemaic products cases, a male whose divine status or rank the magistrate, during the Ptolemaic Period don BM EA 10086, Deir el-Medina temple), where colours are used, several papyri opt for is marked by a curved beard (Type 2 in the there was a return to the unidirectional pat- or a renepet reed (pLondon BM EA 9946). The a black filling while only a few of them resort appen­dix tables, fig. 4a), although this ele­ tern in which the former and the latter both sit colourful representations of the New King- to yellow or red tones.14 ment was sometimes omitted (Type 3, fig. facing right, looking at the deceased.12 dom gave way to a plainer style of black line- The body of the central figure in BD 125/ 4b). In the New Kingdom, Third Intermedi- The protagonist is cladded in a short kilt drawings during the Saite Recension, in which JaD scenes is most frequently shown kneel- ate Period and the Twenty-fifth Dynasty, figu­ and his chest is either bare or is partially cov- some details were sometimes indicated using a ing, either with his two knees resting on the res with divine attributes were more com- ered by a vest or sash. Although New King- single colour. ground line (Type 2 in the appendix tables) mon than those without signs of divine rank. dom examples are rich in details, his appear- Most publications do not include informa- or with one leg bent in an attitude akin to the This tendency became less pronounced over ance later became highly schematised. The tion on skin or wig colours, or only contain sign Gardiner A1 ( , Type 1).15 His arms are the course of the Late Period, and du­ring limbs might be fully depicted in Ptolema- black-and-white photographs, which hinders completely or partially (with bent elbows) the Ptolemaic Period figures with or -with ic versions, but often overlooking anatomical the analysis of the meanings and implications stretched in opposite directions, with the out divine attributes appear in approximate- details, or simple stick-figures might be used, conveyed by hues. But, and as indicated in the palms of his hands usually turned down in a ly equal numbers, with a slight predominance while body ornaments (collars, arm and an-

13 In two New Kingdom papyri, a sun disc was drawn in the position assigned to the male figure in other manuscripts: pParis Louvre N. 3097 and pParis Louvre N. 3073. 9 Munro 1988: 108 for New Kingdom papyri. 14 The latter is the most frequently-used colour for details such as sun-disks, fire-signs, and other elements: see Mosher 10 See n. 4 and 10 to the appendix tables. 2016: 43, 47 for comments on the trend toward the limited use of colour in some documents of the Theban-x, 11 Among the sources collected in the appendix, the figure is only omitted in TT 296; see Feucht 1985: Taf. XVII, Szene 12. Theban-y, and Later HG traditions, either when enhancing the magical efficacy of the spells, or under the influence 12 For Saite and Ptolemaic Books of the Dead, the right-facing orientation is symbolic of the exalted status held by of older models. deities or demigods as beings who live in the West, and, in the case of Osiris and Re, it indicates their standing as 15 A standing figure (Type 3), as opposed to a kneeling one, is only attested in pLeiden T16, pParis Louvre N. 3089, beings who have “gone forth” or achieved resurrection after death (Mosher 2016: 48). and pParis Louvre N. 3153, which all date to the Ptolemaic Period.

120 121 TdE82017 Iconographic Rendering of the Notion of Purification ...Lucía Díaz-Iglesias Llanos gesture of protection (figs. 1, 2, 4, 5). This is figure is making an offering if an object was the same action as that performed by the per- placed above the hands, complementing the sonifications of the Herakleopolitan lakes in action,17 or if the palm is slightly cupped to BD 17. The attitude of the character in BD 125 represent a concave hand. If the fingers form changed by the end of the Dynastic Period, as a nearly straight line with the forearm and the his palms were upturned and objects placed thumbs protrude, I have taken these figures as atop of them, so that the depic­ted action examples of the new, forward facing gesture. switched from protection to offering (fig. 6). It The intent behind this new action could have is notable that this change coincides­ chrono­ been to render an act of recitation, following logically with the reinterpretation of the fig- the description offered for this gesture by Bri- ures of BD 17, which underwent the same gitte Dominicus: “Bei der Rede und Rezita- modification to adopt an attitude of offering. tion wird eine Hand mit dem Daumen hoch The new attitude was not the dominant one in nach vorn ausgestreckt ( ) . Der Arm the two vignettes examined here, being limit­ ist dabei angewinkelt ( ) bis gestreckt ed to very few of the extant manus­cripts.16 ( ), auch über Schulterhöhe hinaus er- Moreover, in the case of Ptolemaic documents hoben ( )”.18 containing BD 125/JaD, the offering ges- To complement the action performed by the ture alternates with a new attitude that is at- figure, two identical objects—a pair of eyes— Figure 3: Depiction of the Herakleopolitan lakes in BD 17 (after Taylor (ed.) 2010: 52). tested in twenty-five percent of the survi­ving are shown flanking it. When the action is pro- examples: the figure has outstretched arms tective or recitative, the objects are placed be- and his palms are turned toward the viewer low the palms; when the action is an offer- and a basin filled with vertical waves (pLon- ly associated with the sun and is a symbol of ( , fig. 7). Although the gesture resem- ing, they are situated above them.19 There are don BM EA 10470, fig. 5). The third variation everlastingness. The ovals encircling the eyes bles that of offering, the hands lack a concave three minor variations of this basic outline, omits all complements to the action (the Pto- protected by the figures embodying the Hera­ form, are not depicted in profile, and no ob- only docu­mented by a small number of docu­ lamaic pLeiden L.XII.2, pLeiden T16, pLon- kleopolitan lakes in BD 17 are also paint- ject is placed atop them. Some particular- ments. The first shows two pairs of eyes, with don BM EA 9946, pLeiden T21, and pLondon ed yellow or red, which reinforces their solar ly schematic images, where fingers are not in- one pair placed above and the other below BM EA 9963). Other than these three cases,­ connections. dicated, pose a problem because it is not pos- the palms (the Ptolemaic pNew York Amherst the pair of flanking eyes are symmetrical, ei- A wide typology of eyes is attested. Before sible to discern which attitude was intended. 35 and pLondon BM EA 10043). The second ther with their corners turned inwards (the the Ptolemaic Period, the feathered type In these examples, I have concluded that the depicts two different objects, a feathered eye converging model, typical for most cases) or ( ) was fashionable, whereas the simple eye outwards (the diverging model).20 ( ) and the wedjat ( ) were used less of- The eyes are placed inside ovals in more ten. This trend was reverted in later- docu than half of the available sources, though sev- ments, in which the wedjat type is predomi-

16 The change in the gesture (from protection to offering) is attested in five percent of the Late Period to Ptolemaic eral manuscripts bear witness to the use of nant, followed by the feathered eye (usual- documents of BD 125/JaD and in fifteen percent of the sources with BD 17 from the same periods. semicircles or the absence of surrounding ele­ ly not inserted in ovals) and, to a much less- 17 I follow the assessment of Wilkinson in relation to offering gestures: “the active, formal presentation of an object is ments. The rims of the ovals, if thick enough, er extent, by the simple one. In Ptolemaic ex- usually signified by the object’s being held on the outstretched, cupped hand” (1994: 195). can be painted blue or black, and the back- amples, the typology was extended with the 18 Dominicus 1994: 77–80, 89–91, 95, Abb. 17–18, 21–22. The author points out that the gesture (labelled by her as ground colour of the oval, if any, is normally introduction of simplified eyes, which were Redegeste or Rezitationsgeste) is characteristic in the Old Kingdom of tomb owners when making a speech, of priests white (in the New Kingdom and Third Inter- barely a schematic representation of the or- performing a ritual or making signals, and of doctors slaughtering animals for offering. During the New Kingdom, mediate Period), or yellow or red (in the Late gan, or where the eyes were omitted. This the recitation gesture is attested in similar contexts. From the Old Kingdom onward it is also found in a variety and Ptolemaic Periods). Whereas white stands change is also encountered in the vignette of of non-funerary scenes, such as in appeals to take counts or measurements, in songs accompanying the harvest or for purity and cleanliness, yellow is normal- the Herakleopolitan lakes in BD 17, in which musicians who are addressing those who play instruments. For this gesture see also Brunner-Traut 1977. For open palms see Baines 1992. 19 There are some exceptions to this pattern: in pParis Louvre AE/N 3068+3133 and pVatican 48832, the eyes are quite sizeable and they have been depicted beside the figure, not under his protective arms; for pNew York Amherst 35 and pLondon BM EA 10043, with two pairs of eyes each, see below. 20 The only exception is pDublin 1664, in which both eyes face right.

122 123 TdE82017 Iconographic Rendering of the Notion of Purification ...Lucía Díaz-Iglesias Llanos

than papyrus, with a corresponding reduction duced in the same workshop show a strong re- on the scenes’ details. semblance.25 The central element of the ceil- The data assembled in the appendix further ing in BD 125/JaD is not, however, identical provides information on workshops, the pro- in those papyri that form a particular subset duction of BD manuscripts, and the circula- within the N3089 tradition (pParis Louvre N. tion of Vorlage. For the latter aspect, and as has 3089, pParis Louvre N. 3248, and pParis Lou- been mentioned above, the Ptolemaic docu- vre N. 3272). This subset can be identified by ments from Memphis provide some hints of the use of textual variants and illustrations Figure 4: The central figure of a frieze crowning the Hall of Judgment. a. Bearing divine attributes (QV 66, after Thausing and Goedicke 1971: Pl. 24); b. Without divine attributes (pLondon BM EA 10471, after Faulkner et al. 1994: Pls. 28–29). a reintroduction of master copies in the last that are not found in other documents of the phases of BD production. Moreover, exam- same tradition.26 Moreover, despite deriving ples potentially derived from the same model from a very similar master source, pParis Lou- a wider variety of eye types was introduced male character-and-eyes motif is attested in or attributed to the same traditions or work- vre E. 7716 and pCologny CIV27 differ both in in later periods. Nonetheless, the feathered Memphite documents from the New King- shops can be compared to see how the figure style, using stick figures the former and fully eye was the most common in New Kingdom, dom and the Late Period, but disappeared between the eyes is rendered. In the case of drawn limbs the latter, and in details such as Third Intermediate Period, and Theban Late shortly thereafter in that area. To account for the Late and Ptolemaic traditions identified by the inclusion of ovals to enclose the eyes. Fi- and Ptolemaic examples of BD 17. this, one may suggest that the master copies Malcolm Mosher, such comparisons should nally, the versions of the illustrations shared In diachronic terms, there is a gradual in- from which the latter derive fell out of use dur- be made in the context of his conclusions re- by the BM 10086 group, the N3152 group, and crease in the number of documents that depict ing the Ptolemaic Period, when new models in garding vignettes, namely that artists worked the papyri pParis Louvre N. 3079 and pParis the figure between the two eyes in BD 125/JaD, which the figure was omitted were either gen- from a separate master source of illustrations Louvre N. 3144 also display small nuances.28 which reached its peak in the Ptolemaic Peri- erated or introduced from elsewhere (proba- that differed from the master source used for The examples cited in the previous para- od, as well as a tendency towards the region- bly Thebes). the texts.23 graph show that the presence or absence of alization of the scene’s features. Strikingly, The figure is also conspicuously absent The artists working in the tomb of Nefertari signs of divine status in the figure, of small the figure was typically absent from the mod- from other type of source bearing BD spells: (QV 66) were also engaged in the decoration embellishments in body or wig, and of ovals els (Vorlage) of the JaD scene that were used mummy bandages. Of the thirty-seven ex- of some Deir el-Medina tombs (TT 265 and surrounding the eyes and the typology of the to decorate the private tombs outside Thebes amples of psychostasia collected in the data- 290), and probably had access to the model­s latter, modify (within a frame of limited vari- during the New Kingdom,21 the royal­ tombs base of the Toten­buch-Projekt, only two bear an used for the queen’s monument.24 Therefore, ations) the basic common scheme. These ex- of Tanis in the Third Intermediate Period (Os- elaborate version of the frieze (with braziers, the compositions in the royal and the two pri- amples should be taken as a further evidence orkon II and Sheshonq III), and among those urae­i, and maat feathers) crowning the Hall vate funerary monuments show many of the that the use of the same Vorlage did not lim- circulating in Ptolemaic workshops in Mem- of Judgement. Of these two, only M. Prince­ same features, although the direction of the it the ‘creativity’ or ‘freedom of choice’ of a phis and Akhmin. This explanation is more ton pharaon­ic roll No 8 includes the figure. eyes can follow either the diverging (QV 66, scribe or draughtsman. Thus, products man- plausible than thinking that the figure was in- The reasons for such a limited number of at- TT 290) or converging (TT 265) pattern. ufactured in the same workshop or belong- cluded in the Vorlage and omitted during the testations include the uneven state of preser- Simi­larly, papyri considered to have been pro- ing to the same tradition could show small re- execution of the decoration of tomb walls and vation of bandages,22 and the fact that textiles papyri in these areas. It is noticeable that the are a rough material, more difficult to decorate

23 Mosher 2016: 42. 24 Hofmann 2004: 91. For similarities in Deir el-Medina examples and some royal tombs see also: Rößler-Köhler 1979: 139–140 and 1999: 17–18 and Abb. 25; Lüscher 2007. 21 The JaD scene was included in several non-Theban funerary monuments, in which the figure was omitted:the 25 Müller-Roth (2008: 154, Anm. 27) attributes pParis Louvre N. 3079, pMilano E. 1023, pParis Louvre N. 3144, and tomb of Jmn-Htp in Assiut, beginning of the Nineteenth Dynasty: Karig 1968; the tomb of Rw-dd-anx, Abydos v pCairo J.E. 97249 to the same workshop. A close resemblance between pChicago OIM 9787 and pBerlin P. 3058 is 40, Twentieth Dynasty: Ayrton et al. 1904: 9, 42, Pl. XXVI, Seeber 1976: Abb. 13; the tomb of Nxt-Mnw in Dehmit, also highlighted by Mosher (2016: 29–32). : Hermann 1936: 9, Taf. 4 a; the tomb of KA-kmwt in Aswan, Ramesside Period: Cecil 1903: 60–64, Pl. IV; the tomb of Pn-nwt, reign of Ramesses VI in Aniba; Steindorff 1937: II, 242–247, Pl. 104 a–b and Seeber 1976: Abb. 10; 26 Mosher 2016: 27. In the other documents attributed to this tradition, the group of figure-plus-eyes was not added to and the tomb of Mry, of the late Nineteenth Dynasty or early Twentieth Dynasty, also in Aniba: Steindorff 1937: II, the frieze. 212–215, Taf. 27 a–d. 27 Mosher 2016: 45. 22 In some cases, only the lower part of the JaD scene or a small portion of it is preserved. 28 Mosher 2016: 45.

124 125 TdE82017 Iconographic Rendering of the Notion of Purification ...Lucía Díaz-Iglesias Llanos

ceased prior to their rebirth.30 However, the elements integrated in the frieze of the build- enabled the deceased to rise as a sinless and di- whitish, yellowish, reddish, or neutral colour ing’s ceiling), to seek the relationships be- vine being. The recitation gesture could be un- of the ovals’ filling, the absence of waves sug- tween the vignette and the textual content of derstood along these same lines, as an action gesting the presence of water, and even the spell BD 125, and to explore the formal and se- undertaken by the deceased⎯a negative decla- omission of the ovals themselves call his sug- mantic similarities between this scene and the ration of sins⎯in order to prove his or her pu- gestion into question. Moreover, these local image of the Herakleopolitan lakes in BD 17. rity. Alternatively, the figure could represent a bodies of water are not mentioned in the text I here endorse the opinion of several authors male character of the hereafter who, by means of BD 125 and the only instance where a lake that have called attention to the relationship of the protective gesture he makes, acts in fa- Figure 5: The central figure is depicted as a fecundity is depicted in the vignettes (pLondon BM EA between the vignettes of these two chapters vour of a deceased individual who is in the figure between a feathered eye and a pool. pLondon BM EA 10471 (after Faulkner et al. 1994: Pl. 31). 10470, fig. 5) is an exceptional case for which because of their shared ideas of purification, throes of final judgement. an alternative explanation can be offered (see destruction of evil, and rebirth.33 The eyes play a crucial role in this scene, below). The figure analysed in this article lacks dis- with the two dominating typologies being workings of gestures, omission, or addition of For Erika Schott, the two eyes are the sym- tinctive elements that provide clues to his the feathered and the wedjat eyes. According details, but respect the traditions or rules that bols of the two Maat goddesses, who often su- identity. He does not wear a specific head- to Christine Seeber, the feathered eyes were ensured that the scene would be recognisable. pervised the judgement from one of the cor- dress, grasp any characteristic object in his symbols of the solar god in two moments of Alternatively, the person who executed the fi- ners of the Hall, while the figure placed be- hands, nor are symbolic colours used for his his cosmic and vital cycle, namely at dawn as nal pro­duct might have combined several of tween the eyes could have been Osiris or Re, body or labels written with his name (mytho­ the rising sun and at dusk as the setting sun. the copie­s available at the workshop, giving in-so-far as these two deities are often called logical or otherwise). Moreover, he is not Insofar as the deceased is assimilated to this rise to a unique composition.29 “Lord of the two Maat”.31 One may concede mentioned directly in the accompanying text, god, the presence of two eyes could point to that many Egyptian goddesses who were re- be it the so-called negative confession or the the daily and recurrent rebirth of the former, garded as daughters of Re, as Maat herself captions to the JaD. I therefore think that who is purified of all his sins and justified -be 2. Meaning of the figure between the was, can be represented as eyes and emana- the identity that some researchers have estab- fore the deity that heads the tribunal to decide eyes in BD 125 and JaD, and their relation- tions of the sun.32 However, Schott’s hypothe­ lished for this fi­gure, equating him with the upon his or her fate.36 With regards to the ren- ship with the scene of the Herakleopolitan sis was based on a single manuscript of the Heh gods,34 is not well grounded. Instead, dering of solar deities’ names, while the cre- lakes in BD 17 Ptolemaic Period and does not take into ac- I suggest that the figure could represent the ator solar god could adopt the appearance of a count the fact that many examples display deceased,35 or rather a stereotyped image of wedjat eye, which could even function as a de- Several researchers have offered differing ex- the figure placed between the eyes without the deceased, given that no gender distinction terminative in one of the sun-god’s names in planations for the meaning of, and symbolism divine attribute (Type 3 in the tables), a fact is visible between male and female owners in the Litany of Re, the feathered eye is only at- behind, the figure-plus-eyes-in-ovals group that would make equating it with Osiris or Re manuscripts that were made to order. I inter- tested in the orthography of a word that refers in BD 125/JaD, or of some of its components. doubtful. pret the divine attributes borne by the figure to Atum (jmAxw).37 Alberto Siliotti and Chris- Henk Milde considered that the ovals are de- In my opinion, in order to grasp the mean- as a sign of the result expected from BD 125: a tian Leblanc have suggested that the two eyes pictions of the two Herakleopolitan lakes, ing of the scene it is crucial to understand the positive verdict in the post-mortem judgement could be cryptographic forms of rendering the mentioned and illustrated in BD 17 as pla­ces symbolism of the eyes, to analyse the group in that would provide access to the beyond, and two ancient Egyptian conceptions of time and for the ritual cleaning of the sun and the de- its closest iconographic context (the rest of the

33 Seeber 1976: 66; Milde 1991: 85; Taylor (ed.) 2010: 207. 29 For these two options, see: Lucarelli 2006: 237; Taylor 2006: 280 (on the “individual graphic hallmarks” incorporated 34 Munro 1988: 107. by draughtsmen and scribes to the fundamental design); Backes 2010: 13; Mosher 2016: 48. 35 An idea already suggested by Botti 1964: 52. 30 Milde 1991: 91, n. 34. The same idea was earlier advanced by Seeber 1976: 66. 36 Seeber 1976: 66. 31 Schott 1992: 37. For the function and symbolism of the two Maat goddesses, see Griffiths 1960: 55–57; Yoyotte 1961: 37 Díaz-Iglesias Llanos 2005: 59–60; 2014: 269. The wedjat eye as a symbol of the sun-god is present in many 61–63; Grieshammer 1970: 89–90; and Seeber 1976: 140–145. representations of the horizon (Lapp 2015: 11–12, Abb. 11c, 19, Abb. 26b and 27c) and the sun-disc (2015: 37, Abb. 32 According to a passage of BD 125, the deceased addresses those in the hall with the following words: mk sAty(=f), 57b, 51, Abb. 81a, see also Koemoth 1996: 205–206, Fig. 1). Symmetrical compositions of two wedjat in some coffins mrty(=f), jrty=f, nb mAaty rn=k, “See, (his) two daughters, (his) beloved ones, his two eyes, Lord of the Two Maat is and stelae are interpreted by Lapp as depictions of the east/morning/sun and west/evening/moon (2015: 29–31, 36, your name”. For New Kingdom versions of this passage, see Lapp 2008: 16–17a. see also Aufrère 2015: 36–37) or of the east-sun (=Re) and west-sun (=Osiris) by Radwan (2015: 353–357).

126 127 TdE82017 Iconographic Rendering of the Notion of Purification ...Lucía Díaz-Iglesias Llanos

bolism attached to the wedjat as a metaphor such as ostrich feathers, upright cobras, and for the complete being and divine order, as a braziers, are mentioned in a dialogue between sign of the east/sun/day/Re and west/moon/ Thoth and the deceased that is included in BD night/Osiris when paired, and as a power- 125: ful mecha­nism of protection, it becomes an smj=j jrf tw n-mj? appropriate element in the context of trial and justification, and the expected outcome smj=k wj n hAyt m sDt, jnb m jarwt anxw(w)t, wnn sAtw (rebirth).45 pr=f m nwy, Several explanations could be posited to sw pw? account for the presence of two eyes. First, Wsjr pw and owing to the importance of the symmet- “To whom should I announce you then?” rical pattern that governs the scene, one could “You shall announce me to Him whose roof is fire, Figure 6: The central figure depicted making the gesture of offering. pLeiden T1 (after Germer 1997: 42, fig. 43). think that the paired (and converging or di- whose walls are living rising-cobras, the floor of verging) eyes highlight the composition’s ba­ whose house is water”. lance on the frieze, whose axis is the kneeling “Who is that?” figure. Second, the coupled eyes could be an eternity, nHH and Dt.38 However, I have found pair above the scales, in the upper part of the “It is Osiris”.47 apotropaic symbol, similar to that found on no examples in which feathered or wedjat eyes chapel, or presiding over the whole scene.41 tomb entrances from the Old Kingdom on- According to this passage, Osiris is envis- are used in the orthography of these words. The addition of wedjat eyes in the context of ward, on Middle Kingdom coffins and - ste aged as a god surrounded and protected in For Sydney Aufrère, the feathered eye express- the weighing of the heart could be due to the lae, and on New Kingdom sarcophagi. Third, his chapel by a barrier of flames and fiery ser- es the “potentialités anthropomorphiques du fact that one of the meanings of this word, ʻto it might combine one meaning of wedjat— pents, a barrier which is iconographically ren- demiurge, considéré sous l’aspect d’un Fal- be truthʼ or ʻto lack faultsʼ (mAa),42 perfectly as lacking faults (see above)—and the inter- dered as a frieze of cobras and braziers crown- conide cosmique”,39 but besides the solar con- suits the idea of a judgement of the deceased’s pretation of a feathered eye within an oval in ing the architectural structure. The liquid nections highlighted by several authors, John behaviour on earth.43 In this sense, referen­ the depiction of the Herakleopolitan lakes in mentioned could be related either to the pool Baines has pointed out that the sign could be ce is made in CT 691 (later incorporated in- BD 17 as a symbol of the justified and venera- from which a lotus with the four Horus’ sons used as a logogram for the word jmAxw (a re­ to BD 71), to the “night of counting the wed- ble deceased (=jmAxw).46 In the latter case, the rises,48 or with the decoration of the podium surrected being, venerable and commanding jat eye” against the backdrop of the post-mor- duali­ty of the eyes could be related to the fact below the throne of Osiris that is comprised adoration).40 Attention will be paid to this tem judgement: “O those seven knots, shoul- that the deceased denies having committed of ankh-signs and was-sceptres49 (fig. 8). In sphere of meaning below. ders of the balance on this night of calculat- punisha­ble actions in two different declara- both cases, the Nuu is evoked as the medium It is worth highlighting that wedjat eyes ing the wedjat eye, who slice off heads, and sev- tions (the so-called sections BD 125 A and 125 of creation and rebirth, so that the podium were a recurring element in the psychostasia. er necks, who seize hearts, and snatch fore- B), and that the hall in which the action takes and throne of Osiris become a version of the They can be included alone or as symmetrical hearts”.44 Furthermore, given the general sym- place is called “Hall of the two Maat”. primeval hill that emerged out of the initial The remainder of the elements that- sur aquatic chaos.50 The mention of water might round the central group of figure-plus-eyes, also recall the importance of this element as a 38 Siliotti and Leblanc, 1993: 130. 39 Aufrère 2015: 43. 40 Baines 1985: 327. 45 Wilkinson 1992: 42–43; Aufrère 2015: 34–44. 41 Seeber 1976: 70–71 and Anm. 254, Abb. 15, 17. 46 Díaz-Iglesias Llanos 2005: 60, 2014: 269–270. See also n. 40 above. 42 For wDAt bearing the meaning of mAa, see Wb. I, 400, 3; with the meaning of wDA and mAat, see Daumas 1988: 152 (149). Several examples of the use of the word mAa in relation to the judgement were collected by Seeber 1976: 71, 47 BD 125 C § S 8. Lapp (2008: 268d–273d) collects the New Kingdom versions of this passage. 79, 111. In one papyrus, the name given to the hall where judgement is enacted (wsxt) includes the wedjat eye as a 48 Servajean 2001: 275–276 § 15 and Tbl. III, IV. determinative (pParis Louvre E. 17401, Seeber 1976: 71, Anm. 253; Piankoff and Rambova 1957: 104–108, n º 9). 49 A combination commonly used to evoke the water from the Nww which covers the valley when the inundation arrives: 43 A near homophone of the word wDAt, wDA, bears the meaning of ‘remain over, of balance in calculation’ (Faulkner Gabolde 1995: 236 a; Servajean 2001: 276. The latter points out that one of the meanings of the throne’s podium 1962: 75), which is also suitable for the context of judgment after death. I owe this reference to Andrés Diego (mAa) is ‘shore of a water course’. The name could thus evoke the aquatic medium necessary for the emergence of the Espinel. lotus or the beginning of the inundation (itself equated with the humours flowing from Osiris’ corpse). 44 CT VI, 323 q–t [691] = BD 71 § S 8 (Quirke 2013: 171). 50 According to Seeber (1976: 126), the continuous regeneration in the primeval hill and Osiris’ rebirth are linked to-

128 129 TdE82017 Iconographic Rendering of the Notion of Purification ...Lucía Díaz-Iglesias Llanos purifying agent, a recurrent factor in BD 125, politan lakes in BD 17 (fig. 3). Perhaps the as will be discussed below. most striking similarity is the gesture of pro- Feathers, uraei, and braziers are further tection made by the protagonist (or protago- closely related to the concepts of truth, puri- nists) of each scene. With outstretched arms fication, and destruction of evil,51 ideas that and palms turned down, the figure is shown are akin to the context of BD 125. The ostrich protecting the objects placed beneath. More- feather ( ) is frequently used as a symbol of over, the two scenes underwent a contempo- the goddess Maat, who represents the con- raneous change, in which the attitude of pro- cepts of truth, justice, and order. Uraei ( ), or tection was modified to that of offering. This upright cobras, are well-known for their mag- change was limited in the two spells discussed ical capacity to spit fire, and have a scorching here to a minor percentage of the extant doc- breath that keeps the enemies of the gods and uments. Furthermore, in both cases, the com- the pharaoh at a distance.52 They are thus ele- plements to the action performed by the cha­ ments of rejection and defence, which not only­ racters are different types of eyes, with a prefe­ repel the evil pertaining to the deceased but rence for the feathered type in earlier phases Figure 7: The central figure depicted making the gesture of recitation. pVatican 38604 (after Gasse 1993: Pl. XXXVIII). also protect the Hall of Judgement and hinder of production. the entrance of impure beings. The same dis- There are also differences; the elements of suasive and threatening role is fulfilled by bra- BD 125/JaD discussed in this article are attest- Notwithstanding, male characters are also an intermediate link in the process, because ziers ( ), which serve as reminders of the po- ed less often than those of the scene integrated­ attes­ted in the vignette of the Herakleopolitan it is the only one that shares elements­ charac- tential punishment involving destruction by into BD 17. Not only are the number of attes­ lakes in occasional New Kingdom examples, teristic of both chapters: a fecundity figure, a fire that awaits those who have acted against tations lower, but they also appear on fewer and in most known Third Intermediate Period feathered eye, and a pool of water. This seems maat.53 Braziers simultaneously bear a posi­ surfaces,54 given that the figure between the ones. Finally, watery extensions (in the form to be a hybrid composition, which mixes ele- tive value for the deceased due to their apo- eyes is frequently lacking in the decoration of of rectangles, sometimes filled in with blue ments of BD 17 and 125, and may be unique. tropaic side. Although the figure that stands in the frieze in the Hall of Judgement. Whereas or green colours or featuring waves) are not It may well have been created by mistake—a the midst of all these symbols of rectitude and the protagonist in BD 125/JaD is a male figu­ present in BD 125/JaD, while they form a very slip of the mind by the scribe or draughtsman purification is not mentioned in the text, he re who may or may not have borne signs of di- prominent element in the Herakleopolitan in charge of the vignettes, who erroneous- does not seem to be separated from this same vine status (mainly a curved beard), the lo- scene of BD 17. ly mixed elements of the two (rather similar) conceptual context. cal pools in BD 17 are most often personified The formal relationship between the groups scenes. There are a number of conspicuous similar- as fecundity figures. The election of the latte­r depicted in BD 125 and BD 17 is striking. Au- Another hypothesis, which accords with ities, but also differences, between this scene typology owes to the blatant relationship be- thors such as Milde have suggested that the characteristic traits of Egyptian thought pat- from BD 125/JaD and the vignette that in- tween fecundity figures and water, which mytheme of bathing the deceased in the He­ terns, such as the multiplicity of approaches, cludes the personifications of the Herakleo- is the main component of the local lakes. rakleopolitan lakes formed the backdrop to is to consider the formal similarity of the two the image in BD 125. However, the idea that vignettes to be the result of iconographic con- the local lakes are featured in the scene of BD vergence. This is the process by which similar 125 was rejected above and there are also some iconographic motifs serve to represent differ- gether. Water also plays a vital role in Osirian tombs; textual, pictorial, and archaeological sources (specially from chronological problems. The vignettes of BD ent, but essentially related, ways of conceiv- the New Kingdom onward) show water surrounding in a symbolic or real manner the nucleus of the god’s tomb, featured as a hill atop an island (Einaudi 2007). 125 are attested from the reigns of Hatshep- ing the same idea. The single male character sut/Thutmose III–Amenhotep II onward, and that protects two eyes within ovals in BD 125/ 51 Seeber 1976: 65. therefore predate the oldest developed image­s JaD, and the two fecundity figures that protect 52 Wilkinson 1992: 108–109. of BD 17, which only date to the post-Amarna an eye within an oval (and two pools) in BD 53 Wilkinson 1992: 160–161. Feathers, braziers, and baboons are also present in other important hallmarks of the period. Given this, the iconographic transfer 17, illustrate the common theme of purifica- beyond, such as the Lake of Fire (BD 126): Seeber 1976: 184–186. could have worked in the opposite direction, tion, as well as the related ideas of justification 54 The male figure between eyes is not incorporated into the iconographic repertoire of Third Intermediate and Late Period coffins, despite the fact that the Judgement after Death is frequently attested on coffin boards (Seeber 1976: from BD 125 to BD 17. The image in pLondon of the deceased and rebirth as a divine being. 44–48; Niwinski 1985: 202–203, fig. 2 a, 2006: 248–254, 260). As mentioned above, the scene is not attested in BM EA 10470 (fig. 5), a Ramesside manuscript This mythical argument (=mytheme) unfolds private tombs outside Thebes and is only documented in one mummy bandage. that belonged to Any, might conceivably be in the purification, elimination of sins, and

130 131 TdE82017 Iconographic Rendering of the Notion of Purification ...Lucía Díaz-Iglesias Llanos

The iconographic resemblance between My purity is the purity of this great benu-heron these elements of BD 17 and BD 125/JaD which is in Herakleopolis Magna.58 strengthens the conceptual or essential link that exists between both compositions. This jnk wab r, wab awy, Ddw n=f: jj wy sp 2 m Htp jn mAAyw sw link has already been suggested by authors I am pure of mouth, pure of arms, one to whom such as Hermann Kees, Joachim Spiegel, is told: “come, come in peace” by those who see Rein­hard Grieshammer, Christine Seeber, or him.59 Henk Milde55 and will be explored in this fi- nal part of the article through their content wab=kw, HAt=j m wab, pHy=j twr, Hr(y)-jb=j and spatial distribution in a given media. m Sdyt mAat, nn at jm=j Sw=t(j) m mAat, wab=j m Sdyt According to BD 17, bathing in the Hera­ rsy(t), Htp=j m Hm mHt(y)t, m sxt snHmw, wab jst Ra kleopolitan lakes enables the deceased to pre­ jm=s m wnwt twy n(yt) grH hrw sent him or herself before the tribunal that am pure, my breast in purity, my rear cleansed, punishes culprits as a being who is free of my middle in the pool/site of Maat, there is no sins,56 and thus to gain access to Osiris’ dwell- limb in me that is void of maat. I purify myself in ing, a sacred space that requires absolute puri- the southern site/pool, I rest in the northern settle- ty. Significantly, BD 125 is headed by the title ment, in the marsh of locusts, in which the crew of Ddwt xft spr r wsxt tn n(y)t mAaty, pxA NN m xww Re purifies at this hour of the night and day.60 nb jr-n=f, mAA Hrw nTrw,57 “what is said upon arrival to this Hall of the two Maat, purify NN Mj mj, jn ©Hwty, jj-n=k r mj? jj-n=j r smjt, ptr xrt n=k? of all the evil he has committed, see the face of jw=j wab=kw m xww, xw-n(=j) wj m Sntwt n(y)t jmjw the gods”. It can be concluded that the same hrw=sn topics, notably dispelling faults and having Figure 8: Elements that complement the meaning of the figure between eyes in pBerlin P. 3008 (modified, after BonnetRÄRG : 338, fig. 82). “Come, please!” says Thoth, “Why have you come?” access to the gods, are dealt with in both BD “I have come to report”. “What is your condition?” 17 and 125. “I am purified from prohibited things, (I) have pro- In BD 125, the deceased that must prove assi­milation to the sun through bathing in the turing two eyes in BD 125/JaD, the draftsman tected myself from the quarrels of those that are in his or her innocence in the trial insists several their days (on duty)”.61 Herakleopolitan lakes (in BD 17), and in the could maintain symmetry in a motif that oc- times on his or her purity by means of a wide two declarations of innocence recited by the cupies the axis of the ceiling of the Hall of variety of statements. In some of these, water If purity is clearly reflected in the transla­ted deceased in the Hall of the Two Maat, which Judgement, the decoration of which is mir- plays a major role: passages of BD 125, it should be recalled that turn him or her into a justified being and an rored on both sides of the central figure. This the deceased expects to obtain the same result jw=j wab=kw, sp 4 Oiris-NN (in BD 125). Water and verbal nega- notwithstanding, the depiction of two feath- by bathing in the Herakleopolitan lakes in BD abw=j abw bnw pwy aA nty m Nn-nswt tion are the two agents that, in each context, ered or wedjat eyes could be also related to 17. Some excerpts will suffice to illustrate this allow the deceased to do away with his or her the fact that the deceased needed to recite two I am pure, (repeat) four times. desire: “my wrongdoing has been done away faults, and to reach the state of a justified and confession­s in order to do away with his or her divine being. faults and thus be turned into a purified wDA( Within this process of convergence, the with the sense of mAa), justified, and venerable two vignettes are not identical but display dis- being (an jmAxw). tinct aspects that result from the speci­fic traits As part of the process of iconographic con- 55 Kees 1956: 98–99; Spiegel 1935: 44–51, and 45 Anm. 2; Grieshammer 1970: 63; Seeber 1976: 66; Milde 1991: 53, 83–84, 91. of each situation. In BD 17, the dua­lity of the vergence, the Egyptians appear to have con- 56 BD 17 § S 13, Quirke 2013: 58–59 (Section 20). Hera­kleopolitan lakes and their regenerative sidered that the scenes of BD 125/JaD and BD 57 BD 125 a § P. Lapp (2008: 4a–7a) for the New Kingdom sources of this statement. capacity is reflected in the depiction of two 17 were related. As a result, both underwent 58 BD 125 a § S 3. For parallels, see Lapp 2008: 50c–53c (the version translated of all quoted passages is that of TT 82). pools and the two beings that embody them, similar modifications over time, such as the 59 BD 125 c § S 4. For parallels, see Lapp 2008: 180–181a–c. and in the decision to employ the physiogno- change from a protective to an offering ges- 60 BD 125 c § S 5–6. For parallels, see Lapp 2008: 194c–201c. my of fecundity figures for the latter.­ By fea- ture performed by the protagonist(s). 61 LdSD 125 c § S 8. For parallels, see Lapp 2008: 262e–269a (translation of pCairo CG 24095).

132 133 TdE82017 Iconographic Rendering of the Notion of Purification ...Lucía Díaz-Iglesias Llanos with, my evil has been dispelled, the falseness 2. Nineteenth to Twentieth Dynasties: papyri indicates other references that describe and to damage or loss). that adhered to me has been removed. I have 3. Nineteenth to Twentieth Dynasties: royal discuss different aspects of the source. Where ∅. Omitted. bathed/purified myself in those two great and private tombs all relevant literature is cited by the Toten­buch- and stately lakes which are in He­rakleopolis 4. Twenty-first Dynasty: papyri Projekt (totenbuch.awk.new.de/), the biblio­ Attitude of the figure Magna”.62 The insistence on purification con- 5. Twenty-fifth Dynasty: tomb graphy is kept to a minimum. Only those titles . Protection forms to the requirement that bein­g physical- 6. Late Period to early Ptolemaic Period: pa- not recorded there or lengthier discussions on . Offering ly and morally clean is crucial to achieving re- pyri dating and transmission issues are cited. . Recitation. Extended arms with open birth. 7. Ptolemaic Period, Thebes: papyri and tem- The tables below include the following ca­ palms and thumbs pointing upwards My assessment is that the conceptual asso­ ples tegories: – . Cannot be determined with certainty (due ciation between the two chapters is further to damage or loss) graphically and spatially strengthened in sev- 8. Ptolemaic Period, Memphis: mummy ban- Location ∅ . Omitted eral sources. As explored in another article, dages Two positions predominate, albeit with some BD 17 and 125 are located on the superim- 9. Ptolemaic–Roman Period, Middle Egypt: Object protected or offered posed or opposing registers of walls in a num- papyri exceptions that will be mentioned in each sec- ber of tombs at Thebes (QV 66, TT 265), on a 10. Ptolemaic Period, unknown provenance: tion: Indications are provided for the typology of sarcophagus (of PA-Sdw in TT 3), and in a tem- papyri Above BD 125 B indicates that the figure is eyes (feathered or , the latter lacking the ple (the Osireion at Abydos), each of which placed above the scene of the so-called nega- vertical addition, wedjat ; and simple ), were constructed at different times, and in This catalogue of sources is structured ac- tive confession, which is uttered before forty- the presence of ovals surrounding them, and which a specific selection and distribution of cording to media, provenance, and chronolo- two judges. orientation. The eyes always appear in pairs BD chapters was chosen.63 The two chapters gy. For Ptolemaic examples, papyri belonging Above JaD (=Judgement after Death) indi- and are situated on either side of the central are thus linked in vertical or horizontal axes to the traditions or groups established by M. cates that the figure is located above the scene figure. that visually underscore all the shared connec- Mosher (2016) are further grouped together. of the weighing of the heart. tions highlighted here. Each entry includes the following infor- Abbreviations This analysis of the group depicted on the mation: inventory number; name of muse- Type of figure F. Fringe; ceiling of the Hall of Judgement (BD 125) and um/collection; owner; date; extra sources­ 1. Male fecundity figure B. Background the scene of the Herakleopolitan lakes (BD 17) (othe­r docu­ments that belong to the same 2. Male figure bearing a feature of divinity suggests that there was a relationship between manuscript); provenance (if placed between (typically a curved beard) the two. Each depicts concepts of purity, either squared brackets, origin has been deduced 3. Male figure without feature of divinity 1. Eighteenth Dynasty: papyri physical or spiritual, of judgement, and of trans- from internal data); and state of preservation 4. Female figure formation and rebirth. Although they appear to (three categories are distinguished: good state –. Cannot be determined with certainty (due Thebes have come from different traditions, they even- of preservation, if the vignette is wholly pre- to damage or loss) tually came to be regarded as related through a served; damaged image, if the image is par- ?. The figure does not appear in published pCairo CG 24095 (=JE 338844); Egyptian process of iconographic convergence. tially damaged, but all its elements are recog- ima­ges and may have been omitted, but this Museum; MAj-Hr-prj; Amenhotep II; KV 35; nisable; fragmentary state, if some of the ele- cannot be demonstrated good state of preservation. ments are blurred or have disappeared owing ∅. Omitted Munro 1994: Taf. 60. Appendix to the presence of lacunae). Seeber 1976: 201 (1), dates it to the reigns of Key to the tables Two symbols are used in the bibliographi- Body posture Amenhotep II and Thutmose IV; Luft 1977: cal references: 1. Seated with arms extended in different di- 70; Bellion 1987: 105, places it in the 21st Dy- The appendix is comprised of the following ta- indicates publications or websites where rections, one knee bent upwards as in the sign nasty; Munro 1988: 278 (Kat. a. 19), dates bles: the vignette is included (as an image or as a Gardiner A1 ). it to the time of Amenhotep II; Totenbuch- 1. Eighteenth Dynasty: papyri description); 2. Seated with arms extended in different di- projekt, TM 134265 . 3. Standing with arms extended in different di- 62 BD 17 a § S 8. rections. pParis Louvre AE/N 3068 + 3113; Musée du 63 Díaz-Iglesias Llanos 2013. –. Cannot be determined with certainty (due Louvre; Nb-qd; Thutmose IV–Thutmose IV/

134 135 TdE82017 Iconographic Rendering of the Notion of Purification ...Lucía Díaz-Iglesias Llanos

Amenhotep III; good state of preservation. (Kat. a. 38), dates it to the time of Thut- 2. Nineteenth to Twentieth Dynasties: ty and pLondon BM EA 10473 to the be- Devéria 1872: Pl. VIII. mose III/Amenhotep II–Amenhotep II; papyri ginning of the 19th Dynasty; Seeber 1976: Seeber 1976: 204 (9), dates it to the 19th Totenbuchprojekt, TM 134314 . Thebes3 belonging to the 18th Dynasty; Luft 1977: the 19th Dynasty; Rössler-Köhler 1999: 52, 71, dates it to the 19th Dynasty; Be­ 33; Totenbuchprojekt, TM 133550 . snj; Thutmose IV; good state of preservation. 19th Dynasty; good state of preservation. Sety I; Munro 1988: 300 (Kat. b. 20), pla­ Naville Tb., A.a., Taf. 134–135; Lapp 2004: Pl. Seeber 1976: 66, fig. 13; Faulkneret al. 1994: ces it in the 19th–20th Dynasties; Quirke Memphis 90. Pl. 31; http://www.british museum.org 1993: 47 (119), 77, n. 121, dates pLondon Seeber 1976: 201 (2); Luft 1977: 71; Mun- Shorter 1938: 12; Luft 1977: 68; Totenbuch- BM EA 10471 to the 18th Dynasty; Toten­ pTübingen 2003 a–k; Ägyptische Sammlung ro 1988: 281 (Kat. a. 28), suggests a date projekt, TM 134357 . nrw.de/objekt.tm133529>. III/Amenhotep II–Amenhotep II; [Mem- dates it between the reigns of Thutmose phis]; fragmentary state. IV and Amenhotep III and suggests that pLondon BM EA 10471 + Leather Roll BM Unknown provenance Brunner-Traut and Brunner 1981: 289–292, the owner was the copyist of the papyrus; EA 10473; British Museum; Nxt; end of 18th Taf. 106–107; Buroh et al. 1985: 47, 1 Pl. e. Munro 2006; Lüscher 2010: 110; Toten­ Dynasty–beginning of 19th Dynasty; good pLondon BM EA 10466; British Museum; PA-sr; Seeber 1976: 204 (12), dates it to the 19th buchprojekt, TM 134286 . Faulkner et al. 1994: Pls. 28–29; http:// mentary state (image in fragments 14 and 19). www.british museum.org Totenbuchprojekt, TM 133518 , proposes a Body Object protected/ BM EA 10471 to the end of the 18th Dynas- date in the reign of Amenhotep II. Nº Inv / Provenance Location Type of figure Attitude posture offered

Nº Inv / Body Object protected/ pCairo CG 24095...... 2 Location Type of figure Attitude Above 125 B 1 Provenance posture offered Thebes Blue wig F: blue; B: white

pLondon BM EA Above 125 B and 1 pParis Louvre AE/N 10470.... 1 JaD Green wig 3068+3113..... Above 125 B 2 1 1 Thebes Thebes

pLondon BM EA pTübingen 2003 10471 + Leather 2 3 a–k.. Above 125 B 1 Roll BM EA Above 125 B 1 Black wig ?, –2 Blue wig [Memphis] 10473..... F: blue; B: white Thebes

pLondon BM EA 9900.... Above 125 B 2 1 pLondon BM EA 2 Memphis 10466...... Above 125 B 1 Blue wig Unknown F: dark; B: white

1 Inserted in semicircles. 2 Only half of the right oval is preserved. The form of the left eye is not well defined and resembles a mixture of a 3 The central part of the architrave in pBruxelles E. 5043 + pPhiladelphia E 2775, 16720–22 is lost and the presence of feathered and an wedjat eye. a figure between eyes cannot be demonstrated (Milde 1991: 89).

136 137 TdE82017 Iconographic Rendering of the Notion of Purification ...Lucía Díaz-Iglesias Llanos

3. Nineteenth to Twentieth Dynasties: Assmann 1991: I, 109, II, Taf. 8 (Wandplan TT 305; tomb of PA-sr; Ramesside Period; Dra Saleh 1984: 97, 100, passim; Totenbuch- Tombs 7, Sz. 99), LVI a. Abu el-Naga. projekt, TM 135066 . Thebes awk.nrw.de/objekt.tm134991>.

Body Object protected/ TT 265; tomb of Jmn-m-Jpt; Sety I or Ramess- Nº Inv / Provenance Location Type of figure Attitude KV 11; tomb of Ramesses III; fifth chamber, posture offered left wall; Valley of the Kings; good state of es II; Deir el-Medina; fragmentary state. KV 11..... preservation. PM I2: I, 346 (4) II; Saleh 1984: 70, Abb. 11 Above 125 B 2 1 ? ? 5 KV Lefebure 1889: 107–108; Abitz 1995: 186– and 75. 187. Saleh 1984: 96–97, 99, passim, dates it to In lintel giving ac- QV 66.-.... 2 cess to side 1 PM I2, 2, 518–527; www.thebanmapping- the reign of Sety I; Rößler-Köhler 1979: QV Black wig chamber project.com; Totenbuchprojekt, TM 139–140 and 1999: 12–13 and Abb. 25, F: black; B: white 135123 . reign; Lüscher 2007: 21, highlights that Deir el-Medina Blue wig the walls are decorated as if a papyrus was F: blue; B: white QV 66; tomb of Nefertari (reign of Ramesse­s unrolled on them; Totenbuchprojekt, TM TT 41.... 135047 . state of preservation ...... 8 2 PM I2: 2, 763 (11); Thausing and Goedicke TT 290; tomb of Jrj-nfr; Ramesses II; Deir el- TT 265..... Above 125 B 1 Deir el-Medina Blue wig 1971: Pl. 1–3, 24; Siliotti and Leblanc 1993: Medina; good state of preservation F: blue; B: white 130. PM I2: I, 372 (9)–(11) II; Saleh 1984: 70, Hofmann 2004: 91, suggests that the same Abb. 76 b. TT 290..... 2 Above 125 B 1 passim Deir el-Medina Dark wig F: blue; B: white; pu- artists that took part in the decoration of Saleh 1984: 97, 100, ; Lüscher 2007: pil: yellow; eyelash: red tombs TT 1, 290, and 265 at Deir el-Medi­ 21, dates it to an early phase in the reign and black na were involved in the decoration of QV of Ramesses II; Totenbuchprojekt, TM 66 (see also Milde 1991: 238–239); Toten- 135060 . Khokha pupil: yellow; eyelash: nrw.de/ objekt.tm135127>. TT 296; tomb of Nfr-sxrw; middle or second TT 305.... Above 125 B and half of the reign of Ramesses II; Khokha; frag- 2 ? ? ? 9 Sarcophagus of TT 3 (present whereabouts Dra Abu el-Naga JaD ? unknown, but perhaps inside TT 3); PA-Sdw; mentary state. early reign of Ramesses II; Deir el-Medina; Feucht 1985: Taf. XVII, Szene 12. good state of preservation. Saleh 1984: 97, 100, passim; Niwiński 1989: Zivie 1979: 80–81, fig. 3, Pl. 27. 33; Hofmann 2004: 41, TT 178 and 296 Totenbuchprojekt, TM 135507 . with distribution and content, and could 6 The weighing of the heart, within a chapel presided over by Osiris (Assmann 1991: II, Taf. 9, Sz. 89), is found in have been executed by the same artists; the southern part of the same wall upon which the scene is depicted. Because the central part of the structure’s architrave is lost, the presence or absence of the figure analysed cannot be determined. The negative confession was TT 41; tomb of Jmn-m-jpt; -Sety I; Totenbuchprojekt, TM 135062 . 7 Assmann (1991: II, Taf. 41) does not specify the presence of this element in the line drawing of the scene. However, one can see a deteriorated simple eye on the photograph (1991: II, Taf. LVI a). 8 Only the oval is preserved, while the eye inside it is damaged. 4 Neither BD 125 B nor the scene of the JaD were included among the decoration in the side rooms. However, on the 9 Only Saleh’s description of this scene is available (1984: 70). The author mentions the presence of a squatting god, walls flanking the bay above which is the lintel bearing the figure between eyes, Anubis and Osiris are depicted. flanked by two wedjat eyes. Most authors interpret the feathered eye as a wedjat eye ( ), although in BD 17 V the Both gods play an important role in the post-mortem judgement. typical curved end of the eye ( ) only appears in the 26th Dynasty. It may be that a feathered eye was depicted here.

138 139 TdE82017 Iconographic Rendering of the Notion of Purification ...Lucía Díaz-Iglesias Llanos

4. Twenty-first Dynasty: papyri 2nd World War); good state of preservation. 6. Late Period to early Ptolemaic Period: Persian Period; [Memphis]; good state of pre­ Niwiński 1989: Pl. 9B. papyri servation. Thebes Seeber 1976: 210 (1); Munro 2001: 124 Gasse 2001: cover. (198); Tawfik 2008: 239 (Kat. 37); Len- Thebes Allen 1960: 40–41, dates it to the Persian– pCairo CG 40006 (= S.R. VII 11488); Egyp- zo 2010: 64–67, fig. 1; Totenbuchprojekt Ptolemaic Period; Yoyotte 1971: 18–20, sug- tian Museum; PAj-nDm I; beginning of the 21st Bonn, TM 133525, . riano Egizio; Ns-pAwty-tAwy; 30th Dynasty–early Bellion 1987: 315, follows the suggestion of Deir el-Bahari; good state of preservation. Ptolemaic Period; extra sources: pAms­terdam UB Yo­yotte; Mosher 1992: 151, n. 40 (style 2); Saleh and Sourouzian 1987: Nr. Cat. 235. Unknown provenance 26 (A, Universiteitsbibliotheek), pDallas­ Pub- Gasse 1993: 35–36 (nº 23), dates it to the Seeber 1976: 210 (2); Rössler-Köhler 1979: lic Library, pLecce PUL inv. I 4 (Centro di Studi last indigenous dynasties; Verhoeven 1993: 130–131, 138; Munro 2001: 115 (65); Toten- pCairo CG 40017 (S.R: VII. 11493); Egyptian Papirologico dell’Università di Lecce), pLondon 42, considers it belongs to the late 26th Dy- buchprojekt, TM 134432 . nasty; good state of preservation. preservation. ing in the late Saite Period or early Persian Piankoff and Rambova 1957: 100, fig. 40. Gasse 1993: Pl. XXXI, lower image. Period; Tawfik 2008: 243 (Kat. 48); Mosh- pParis Louvre E. 6258; Musée du Louvre; Bellion 1987: 109–110; Niwiński 1989: 294 Totenbuchprojekt Bonn, TM 57075, . phite tradition; Toten­buchprojekt Bonn, Pinedjem I); Royal Cache in Deir el-Bahari; 116 (72); Totenbuchprojekt Bonn, TM TM 56970, . Museum) and pMünchen ÄS 825 (lost during tm134711>. d’Art et d’Histoire; Jpt-wrt; Late Period–early Ptolemaic Period; fragmentary state. Unknown provenance Limme 1983: fig. 3. Nº Inv / Provenance Location Type of figure Body posture Attitude Object protected/ offered Totenbuchprojekt Bonn, TM 56943, . Ast-wrt; Late Period–Ptolemaic Period; frag- Royal Cache Deir el- Above 125 B 2 Dark wig Bahari F: dark; B: white mentary state. pCairo JE 95707 (=S.R. IV. 639); Egyptian Muse- Leemans 1840: 248; Coenen 1999a: 74, sug- pParis Louvre E. 6258...... Above 125 B and um; ¦A-wnt/¦A-wn-Axw; Late Period–early Ptolema- gests a dating in the 26th Dynasty¸ Toten- 2 1 Royal Cache Deir el- JaD ic Period; [Thebes]; good state of pre­servation. buchprojekt Bonn, TM 56988, . pCairo CG 40017..... Totenbuchprojekt Bonn, TM 57442, . pRodez; Musée Fenaille, Musée d’Archéologie et d’Histoire du Rourgue; Late Period–Ptole- pSt Petersburg 3531; State Hermitage Museum; maic Period; fragmentary state (unrolled). Ns-Mnw/PA-Mnw; 4th century BC; [Thebes]; good Totenbuchprojekt Bonn, TM 134899, . Dynasty; el-Asasif; fragmentary state. Piotrovsky 1974: Pl. 135. Thebes Reference kindly provided by Silvia Einaudi. Bellion 1987: 146, dates it to the Persian–Ptole- pVaticano 38604 (=Vaticano 34) + pTorino maic Period; Tawfik 2008: 277 (Kat. 127); 1815; Museo Gregoriano Egizio and Museo Nº Inv / Provenance Location Type of figure Body posture Attitude Object protected/ offered Mosher 2016: 12–15; Totenbuchprojekt Bonn, Egizio; Late Period–early Ptolemaic Period; TM 57202, . Gasse 1993: Pl. XXXVIII. Bellion 1987: 278, 318, dates it to the 26th Memphis Dynasty; Totenbuchprojekt Bonn, TM 10 The figure hovers in front of the judge that presides over the judgement session, and above other symbols that are 57078, , opts for a dating in the Ptolema- knots, djed-pillar. riano Egizio; PA-Srj-n-tA-jHt Dd PsmTk; Saite– ic Period.

140 141 TdE82017 Iconographic Rendering of the Notion of Purification ...Lucía Díaz-Iglesias Llanos

Body Object protected/ Budek 2008: 24, assigns it a Theban ori- Mosher 1990: Pl. 151. Nº Inv / Provenance Location Type of figure Attitude posture offered gin; Tawfik 2008: 281 (Kat. 140); Mosher­ Allen 1960: 17, indicates that it could have pVaticano 38571...... 2010: 137 and 2016: 25–27, includes it in shared master copy with pChicago OIM Above JaD? 2 1 Thebes 11 the tradition of the “N3089 group” and 9787 in the texts’ selection and distribu- suggests a dating between 280 BC and tion, on XXIV–XXV he points to a date pBruxelles MRAH E. the middle of the 3rd century BC; Toten­ in the Persian–Ptolemaic Period; Goyon 8389 1...... Above JaD 2 2 Thebes buchprojekt Bonn, TM 56600,

pCairo JE 95707...... ch.awk.nrw.de/objekt/tm56600>. gy; Munro 1973: 244, points to a date in Above JaD 2 1 [Thebes] the mid or late Ptolemaic Period due to pParis Louvre N. 3248; Musée du Louvre; ¦jj- its similarity with the stela Turin 1599; pSt Petersburg 3531...... Above JaD 2 1 bX/¦jj-bA-Axt; [Thebes]; good state of preserva- Moshe­r 1990: 61–65, 451–452, 507, 519, [Thebes] tion. 533, 645, Pl. 32, suggests a date ca. 280–

pVaticano 48832...... Mosher 1990: Pl. 163. 250 BC (style 1, group A) and highlights Above JaD 3 1 12 Memphis Mosher 1990: 107–109, 455, 507, 547, 648, its similarity to the vignettes of pPari­s Pl. 37, suggests dating it ca. 250–200 BC, Louvre N. 3144; Mosher 1992: 146, fig. 1, pLeiden T21...... 2 or 3 Above JaD – Unknown Dark wig ? – (style 1, group B); Mosher 1992: 151, n. 42, 151 (style 1); Verhoeven 2001: 226–227, 158, n. 69, 159, fig. 7; Budek 2008: 25–26; points to a date in the end of the 3rd centu- pRodez pRodez...... ? 3 2 13 Tawfik 2008: 287 (Kat. 158); Mosher 2010: ry or the beginning of the 2nd century BC; Unknown ? F: dark; B: yellow 137 and 2016: 25–27, assigns it to the tra- Budek 2008: 23; Mosher 2008: 245–248, pVaticano 38604...... 3 dition of the “N3089 group”; Totenbuch- fig. 4, indicates that the dating suggestion Above JaD 2 Unknown Dark wig projekt Bonn, TM 56756, . ler-Roth 2008: 154, Anm. 27, considers that pParis Louvre N. 3079 belongs to the pParis Louvre N. 3272; Musée du Louvre; same workshop as pMilano E. 1023, pPa­ 7. Ptolemaic Period, Thebes: papyri, pLeiden L.XII.2; Rijksmuseum van Oud- ¦A-xAbs/¦A-(w)-gS; [Thebes]; good state of ris Louvre N. 3144, and pCairo J.E. 97249 ©d-¡rw; temples heden; ca. 350–300 BC; [Thebes]; preservation. (papyrus 17); Tawfik 2008: 289 (Kat. 162); fragmentary state. Mosher 1990: Pl. 164. Mosher 2010: 137, 144–145, 147, and 2016: • Papyri Tawfik 2008: 288 (Kat. 161). Totenbuch- Bellion 1987: 215, dates it to the Late Pe- 23–25, assigns it to the tradition of the projekt Bonn, TM 57014, . The papyrus be- ban origin on account of the owner’s title brid product of several traditions. He al- um; PA-dj-¡rw-pA-xrd; 4th century BC; [The- longs to the same workshop than pStock- and because it follows Mosher style 1, on- so discusses different chronological attri- bes]; good state of preservation. holm MME 1981: 22 according to the data- ly attested in Thebes in the Ptolemaic Pe- butions and dates it ca. 270–240 BC; To- Curtis, Kockelmann, Munro 2005: fig. 1. base. riod; Tawfik 2008: 285 (Kat. 151); Mosher­ tenbuchprojekt Bonn, TM 56591, . 69, point out that pParis Louvre N. 3152 pParis Louvre N. 3089; Musée du Louvre; tradition of the “N3089 group”; Toten­ is a close parallel to this manuscript; To- ^Snq; early 3rd century BC; [Thebes]; good buchprojekt Bonn, TM 56766, . d’Art et d’Histoire; PA-Srj-(n)-Mnw Dd-tw n=f buch.awk.nrw.de/objekt/tm108931>.14 Mosher 1990: 794, 1992 : 151, n. 42, style 1; Wsjr-wr; early Ptolemaic Period; [Thebes]; ex- pParis Louvre N. 3079; Musée du Louvre; tra sources: pParis Louvre N. 3129, E. 4890 ©d-¡rw; 3rd century BC; Armant; good state B + N. 3096 (Musée du Louvre), pKraków 11 Only the upper half of the scene, with the heads of the judges within the chapel, is preserved. It is probable that the of preservation. XI 1503–06.1508–11 (Czartoryski Museum), scene depicted Judgement after Death instead of a negative confession. 12 The eyes contained within ovals have thick eyebrows and are larger than the figure itself, so that they have been depicted on both sides of the latter and not under his protective arms. 14 Mosher postulates the presence of several groups in the Theban production area during the Ptolemaic Period (2010: 13 The papyrus remains unrolled and no details of the figure’s hands are visible. 137–138; complemented in 2016: 19–34).

142 143 TdE82017 Iconographic Rendering of the Notion of Purification ...Lucía Díaz-Iglesias Llanos pNew York Amherst 30 (Pierpont Morgan Li- pParis Louvre N. 3152; Musée du Louvre; lar source to pParis Louvre E. 7716; Toten­ 1 and to the “BM 10086” tradition, a tradi- brary); good state of preservation. ¥Snq; early 3rd century BC; [Thebes]; good buchprojekt Bonn, TM 134874, . 3rd century BC and many of whose textu- Mosher 1990: 93–95 (style 1, group B), 507 Mosher 1990: Pl. 159. al versions resurface again in the late Ptole- (suggests dating it between 250–200 BC), Munro 1973: 243; Bellion 1987: 205, dates it pParis Louvre E. 7716; Musée du Louvre; ¦A- maic Period; Totenbuchprojekt Bonn, TM 647, pl. 35; Barwik 1995, prefers a dating to the Third Intermediate Period; Mosher­ xjj-bjAt; [Thebes]; good state of preservation. 57229, . maic Period on account of its palaeogra- gests dating it between the Saite Period (?) Mosher 1990: 116, 454, 468, 507, 551, 649, phy and its similarity to pChicago OIM and the Ptolemaic Period (style 1, group Pl. 33, suggests a date between the Saite pMilano E. 1023; Civiche Raccolte Archeolo­ 9787; Budek 2008: 24; Tawfik 2008: 267 A); Mosher 1992: 146, n. 24 and 2001: 12, (?) and the early Ptolemaic Period and as- giche e Numismatiche, Castello Sforzesco; (Kat. 97); Mosher 2010: 137 and 2016: n. 42; Budek 2008: 25; Tawfik 2008: 282 signs it to style 1 (group A); Mosher 1992: ¡rw-nfr; 300–250 BC; [Thebes]; extra source: 23–25, includes it in the tradition of the (Kat. 141); Mosher 2010: 137 and 2016: 21– 146, n. 24; Budek 2008: 22; Tawfik 2008: pVaticano 38572/3 (Museo Gregoriano Egi­ “N3079 group”; Totenbuchprojekt Bonn, 22, assigns it to the tradition of the “N3152 285 (Kat. 152); Mosher 2010: 137 and 2016: zio); fragmentary state. TM 56940, . the first decade of the rd3 century BC; To- “N3152 group” and indicates that it derives Gasse 1993: 45 (n º 56); Müller-Roth 2008: tenbuchprojekt Bonn, TM 56656, . CIV; Totenbuchprojekt Bonn, TM 56844, 1023 belongs to the same workshop as pPa- Musée du Louvre; ¡rw-sA-Ast; damaged image. . ris Louvre N. 3079, pParis Louvre N. 3144, Mosher 1990: Pl. 157. pBoston MFA 92.2582; Museum of Fine Arts; and pCairo J.E. 97249 (papyrus 17); Mo­ Bellion 1987: 204, dates it between the 26th ¦A-nt-Jmn; [Thebes]; good state of preserva- pParis Louvre N. 3143 + pGenf D 29; Mu- sher 2010: 127, fig. 13–14, and 2016: 20–21, Dynasty and the Ptolemaic Period; Mosher tion. sée du Louvre and Musée d’Art et d’Histoire; assigns it to style 1 and to the “BM 10086” 1990: 451–452, 507, 544, suggests a dating Smith 1960: fig. 101; Mosher 1990: Pl. 168. Wsjr-wr; 1st century BC; [Thebes]; good state group; Totenbuchprojekt Bonn, TM ca. 280–250 BC and highlights its similar- Smith 1960: 163–165, fig. 101; D’Auria et al. of preservation. 56966, . Mosher 1992: 151, n. 42 (style 1); Budek nance from Saqqara; Mosher 1990: 532; Wild 1972: 36–39, Pl. VIII; Bellion 1987: 2008: 24; Mosher 2016 : 23–25, assigns it Budek 2008: 9; Mosher 2016: 21–22, pla­ 204, dates it to the Late Period; Mosher pParis Louvre N. 3087; Musée du Louvre; to the tradition of the “N3079 group” and ces it within the “N3152 tradition”; Toten- 1990: 453, 507, 453, assigns it to ca. 280– NHm=s-Rat-tAwy; [Thebes]; good state of pre­ suggests a date ca. 270–240 BC; Toten­ buchprojekt Bonn, TM 56938, . and 2016: 21–22, assigns it to the tradition Mosher 1990: Pl. 153. ch.awk.nrw.de/objekt/tm56648>. of the “N3152 group”; Totenbuchprojekt Bellion 1987: 197, dates it between the 26th pCologny CIV; Biblioteca Bodmeriana, Fon- Bonn, TM 57401, and Totenbuchprojekt sher 1990: 81–82, 454, 507, 538, 646, Pl. 32, Ast-wrt; 4th–3rd century BC; good state of pres- [Thebes]; good state of preservation. Bonn, TM 56738, . the early Ptolemaic Period and assigns it Leemans 1842–1905: Pl. XXVI. Coenen 2001: 72–79, indicates a date in to style 1 (group A); Mosher 1992: 147, fig. Leemans 1840: 243–247; Mosher 1992: 146, the late 3rd or early 2nd century BC; Mun- pLondon BM EA 10086; British Museum; ¦A- 2; Budek 2008: 23–24; Tawfik 2008: 276 151, n. 42, n. 89 and 97 (style 1); Verhoeven­ ro 2001: 113, points to a date in the first half nt-Jmn-jj; [Thebes]; damaged image. (Kat. 123); Mosher 2010: 128, 137, 147–148, 1993: 43; Albert 2006: 40–41, fig. 5, sug- of the 2nd century BC; Valloglia 2001: 139– http://www.british museum.org passim, assigns it to the tradition of “pLon- gests a date in the 30th Dynasty or the 3rd 140, 142, photos 121, 123, 130, suggests dat- Faulkner and Andrews 2000 [1985]: 9, sug- don BM EA 10086 group”, although it century BC; Budek 2008: 13; Tawfik 2008: ing it between the 1st century BC and the gests a dating ca. 250–150 BC, 52–53, 60, has textual features of other Theban tradi- 268 (Kat. 99); Mosher 2010: 137, 145 and 2nd century AD; Budek 2008: 11, points to 65, 71, 114; Mosher 2008: 242–245, fig. 3; tions; Mosher 2016: 19, 37, highlights that 2016: 23–25, assigns it to the tradition of a date ca. 200–150 BC; Tawfik 2008: 271 Budek 2008: 16; Tawfik 2008: 284 (Kat. although the texts can follow other tradi- the “N3079 group”; Totenbuchprojekt (Kat. 107); Mosher 2016: 21–22, 45, pla­ 149), dates it between the Late and the tions, the illustrations are nearly always Bonn, TM 56985, . dicates that it derives from a very simi- figs. 1–2 and 2016: 19–20, assigns it to style N3152 groups; Totenbuchprojekt Bonn,

144 145 TdE82017 Iconographic Rendering of the Notion of Purification ...Lucía Díaz-Iglesias Llanos

TM 56598, . it to the “Theban-y Tradition”; Totenbuch- Ptolemy III (245–222 BC) or later; extra U. Luft 1974: 8; Seeber 1976: 222 (3), dates it projekt Bonn, TM 57104, . um); good state of preservation. ic Period; Bellion 1987: 24–25; Budek 2008: und Papyrussammlung; ¦A-rmT-nt-BAstt; 320– Newberry 1899: 52–53, Nr. XXXV, Pl. XX- 7; Tawfik 2008: 264 (Kat. 92), dates it to the 306 BC; good state of preservation. pChicago OIM 9787 (=pRyerson); Oriental IV, dates it to the 22nd Dynasty; Bellion 2nd century BC; Mosher 2016: 33–34, assigns Munro 1973: Abb. 60. Institute Museum, University of Chicago; Nsj- 1987: 8, 57, dates the New York papyrus to it to the tradition of the “Late­r HG Set”; Munro 1973: 58, 150 Anm. 4, suggests a Sw-tfnt; [Thebes]; extra source: pNew York 784 the 22nd Dynasty and the one in London Totenbuch­projekt Bonn, TM 57089, . 1974: 44; Bellion 1987: 32; Budek 2008: preservation. 74, n. 80, points out that the New York pa- 7; Mo­sher 2016: 29–32, assigns it to the Allen 1960: Pl. XXXIV–XXXV; Mosher pyrus belongs to the same owner than the pLondon BM EA 10017; British Museum; ©d- “Theban-y Tradition” and indicates that 1990: Pl. 166; Teeter 2003: Cat. Nr. 51, 98– London manuscript, but was probably a ¡rw; damaged image. it shares common features with pChica- 99, Pl. in 99 and 118. second roll introduced in the burial assem- Mosher 1992: 158, n. 69, 172, n. 129; Budek go OIM 9787 in the layout and the use of Allen 1960: 16–39, Pls. 13–50, suggests blage; Mosher 2001: 85, n. 37 and 39, 2008: 2008: 15; Tawfik 2008: 264 (Kat. 91), dates colour vignettes and also with pTorino it comes from Edfu (n. 12), dates it to the 258, suggests a dating in the second half of it to the late Ptolemaic Period; Mosher 1833; Totenbuchprojekt Bonn, TM 56975, Persian–Ptolemaic Period, and indicates the 3rd century BC; Budek 2008: 15; Tawfik 2010: 138, includes it in the tradition of the . that it could have shared master copy with 2008: 280 (Kat. 136); Mosher 2016: 28–29, “Hieroglyphic group”, whereas in 2016: 33– pParis Louvre N. 3079 in the selection and assigns it to the “Theban-x tradition; To- 34, he includes it in the tradition of the “Lat- pLausanne Inv. 3389; Antiken Museum Basel distribution of texts; Mosher 1990: 118– tenbuchprojekt Bonn, TM 48381, . ond half of the 3rd century BC; Totenbuch- extra source: pParis Louvre E. 4890 (Musée 250–200 BC), 651, pl. 37 (style 1, group B); projekt Bonn, TM 57215, , gives a date in the Wiese 2001: 204 (c). around 200 BC (contra Quaegebeur 1979: state of preservation. early Ptolemaic Period. Budek 2008: 22; Tawfik 2008: 267 (Kat. 38, n. 3, 39, who dates it to the early Ptole- Lepsius Tb., Taf. L; Seeber 1976: 226 (74), fig. 98); Mosher 2016: 29–32, assigns it to the maic Period); Verhoeven 1993: 43; Budek 12, Abb. 25; Mosher 1990: Pl. 167. pParis BN 1/19 (=pCadet); Bibliothèque Na- “Theban-y Tradition”; Totenbuchprojekt 2008: 10; Müller-Roth 2009: 126, argues Bellion 1987: 275, dates it to the Saite Pe- tionale; PA-dj-Jmn-nb-nswt-tAwy; early Ptole­ Bonn, TM 56832, . 137 and 2016: 27–28, includes it in the tra- tween 200–100 BC; Mosher 1990: 120 (in n. http://gallica.bnf.fr dition of the “Ryerson group” and suggests 137 and 507 points out that it probably dates Mosher 1992: 149, 172 (style 3); Coenen pTorino 1833; Museo Egizio; &Aj-s-nxt; good a dating in the mid or second half of the 3rd to the 2nd or 1st century BC), 457, 651, pl. 38 1999b: 455–457, higlights the similiraty state of preservation. century BC. He points out that it shares (style 2, group B); Mosher 1992: 172, n. 127 between this papyrus and pOxford MS Budek 2008: 28; Tawfik 2008: 283 (Kat. common features with pBerlin P. 3058 in (style 3); Verhoeven 1993: 43; Albert 2006: Egypt. a. 42 (P) and suggests that they 146); Mosher 2016: 29–32, assigns it to the the layout and the use of colour vignettes; 40–41, dates it to the end of the 3rd century or were produced from the same master copy “Theban-y Tradition” and indicates that Totenbuchprojekt Bonn, TM 48470, . a date in the 2nd–1st century BC; Tawfik 2008: son; Coenen 2000: 85; Budek 2008: 20– 3058; Totenbuchprojekt Bonn, TM 57577, 266 (Kat. 96); Mosher 2010: 138, assigns it to 21; Mo­sher 2016: 33–34, assigns it to the . pParis Louvre N. 3153; Musée du Louvre; Nsj- the tradition of the “Hieroglyphic Group”, tradition of the “Later HG Set”; Toten­ pA-mdw; [Thebes]; good state of preservation. whereas in 2016: 33–34, he includes it in the buchprojekt Bonn, TM 44389, . und Papyrussammlung; PA-dj; good state of Mosher 1990: 507, 546, suggests a dating­ projekt Bonn, TM 57201, . pVaticano 38569 (=Vaticano 59); Museo Gre- Bellion 1987: 33; Budek 2008: 8, suggests a Budek 2008: 25; Mosher 2016: 27–28, goriano Egizio; Ast-wrt; early Ptolemaic Peri- Theban provenance on account of the own- assigns­ it to the “Ryerson Tradition”; To- pBerlin P. 3008; Ägyptisches Museum und od; [Thebes]; good state of preservation. er’s title and because it follows Mosher tenbuchprojekt Bonn, TM 44551, . good state of preservation. Mosher 2016: 92, assigns it to the tradition

146 147 TdE82017 Iconographic Rendering of the Notion of Purification ...Lucía Díaz-Iglesias Llanos

of the “Later HG Set” (quoted under the of the “Later HG Set”; Totenbuchprojekt pLondon BM EA 10370 B; British Museum; pTorino 1794; Museo Egizio; ¦A-rd-Srj/¦A-Xrd; siglum Vatican # 56); Totenbuchprojekt Bonn, TM 57529, . tion. Tawfik 2008: 283 (Kat. 145); Totenbuch- objekt/tm 57633>. http://www.british museum.org projekt Bonn, TM 57581, . pLondon BM EA 9909; British Museum; ¦Aj- und Papyrussammlung; PA-¡rw; [Thebes]; projekt Bonn, TM 134918, . pTorino 1799; Museo Egizio; NHm=s-Rat-tAwy; Budek 2008: 14; Tawfik 2008: 245 (Kat. U. Luft 1974: 22; Mosher 1992: 151, n.2 [Thebes]; good state of preservation. 55); Mosher 2016: 92, assigns it to the tra- (style 1); Budek 2008: 8, suggests a Theban pLondon BM EA 73671; British Museum; PA- Donadoni-Roveri 1989: 123 (8). dition of the “Later HG Set”; Totenbuch- origin; Tawfik 2008: 246 (Kat. 61); Toten- dj-¢nsw; [Thebes]; good state of preservation. Tawfik 2008: 276 (Kat. 124); Totenbuch- projekt Bonn, TM 57491, . awk.nrw.de/objekt/tm57105>. tenbuch.awk.nrw. de/objekt/tm57524>. nrw.de/objekt/tm 56956>. pLondon BM EA 9923; British Museum; Jrtj- pDublin 1664; Trinity College Library; ¦A- pParis Louvre N. 3088; Musée du Louvre; §A- pTorino 1808; Museo Egizio; ¡rw; [Thebes]; r-w; [Thebes]; good state of preservation. Mnw; [Thebes]; extra source: pBristol H960; Srjt-n-tA-jht; [Thebes]; good state of preserva- good state of preservation. Budek 2008: 14; Tawfik 2008: 245 (Kat. good state of preservation. tion. Donadoni-Roveri 1988: 196, Nr. 269. 55); Mosher 2016: 90, assigns it to the tra- Totenbuchprojekt Bonn, TM 57425, . Totenbuchprojekt Bonn, TM 56599, . projekt Bonn, TM 57491, . nrw.de/objekt/tm57491>. pDublin 1669 + pUnknown provenance; Tri­ pLiverpool 1978.291.264; World Museum; ©d- nity College Library; ¦A-br; [Thebes]; fragmen- pUnknown provenance Irti-rw; Jrtj-rw; good ¡rw; Hissaya; good state of preservation. pLondon BM EA 9946; British Museum; anx- tary state. state of preservation. Bienkowski and Tooley 1995: 33, Pl. 39. Hp/¡apj-anx; extra sources: pCambridge (Mass, Totenbuchprojekt Bonn, TM 57426, . Kockelmann 2008 : II, 191, Anm. 3; Toten- tenbuch.awk. nrw.de/objekt/tm57300>. Centre, Swansea University); good state of buchprojekt Bonn, TM 57133, . • Temples http://www.british museum.org wAt/Ast-wrt; [Thebes]; good state of preservation. Budek 2008: 15; Tawfik 2008: 270 (Kat. (No author) 1981: 44, nº 117, Taf. 26. pToulouse 73.1.6 (=pVarille); ¦A-nt-Jmn; good Temple of Hathor at Deir el-Medina; south- 106); Mosher 2016: 91, assigns it to the tra- Budek 2008: 11; Tawfik 2008: 247 (Kat. state of preservation. ern sanctuary, South wall; Ptolemy VI; good dition of the “Later HG Set”; Totenbuch- 63); Totenbuchprojekt Bonn, TM 57435, Guillevic and Ramond 1975: 26–27 (vi- state of preservation. projekt Bonn, TM 57076, . gnette nº 4). PM II: I, 405–406 (27); LD IV, 16 b; nrw.de/objekt/ tm57076>. Budek 2008: 27, suggests a Theban origin Kákosy 1979: 124–125, figs. 6 and 8; Du pLeiden T1; Rijksmuseum van Oudheden; Ns- based on the owner’s name; Tawfik 2008: Bourget and Gabolde 2002: 303, Pl. 57– pLondon BM EA 9976; British Museum; PA- (nA)-nxt; [Thebes]; damaged image. 285 (Kat. 150); Totenbuchprojekt Bonn, 58. ¡rw; good state of preservation. Leemans 1842–1905: Pl. X; http://www. TM 57178, . tenbuch.awk.nrw.de/objekt/tm135131>. of the “Later HG Set”; Totenbuchprojekt Leemans 1840: 224–228; Budek 2008: 13; Bonn, TM 57503, . projekt Bonn, TM 56976, . offered pLondon BM EA 75042; British Museum; ©Hwty-rx-sw; [Thebes]; good state of preserva- pLondon BM EA 10043; British Museum; pAberdeen ABDUA tion. ¡rw-sA-Ast; [Thebes];good state of preservation. 84022.... Above JaD 3 1 [Thebes] http://www.british museum.org Totenbuchprojekt Bonn, TM 57222, .

148 149 TdE82017 Iconographic Rendering of the Notion of Purification ...Lucía Díaz-Iglesias Llanos

pLeiden L.XII.2...... pMilano E. 1023...... Above JaD 3 1 ∅ Above JaD?16 – 1 [Thebes] [Thebes] –

pParis Louvre pParis Louvre N. 3087.... Above JaD 2 1 N.3089...... Above JaD 3 3 Thebes Thebes pBerlin P. 3058 A–I...... 2 pParis Louvre Above JaD 2 Black wig N. 3248...... Above JaD 2 or 3 1 B: yellow [Thebes] pLausane Inv. 3389...... Above JaD 2 2 pParis Louvre [Thebes] N. 3272.... Above JaD 2 or 3 1 [Thebes] 2 pTorino 1833...... Above JaD 2 Bright wig Paris Louvre 3 N. 3079...... Above JaD 3 2 pBerlin P. 3150 A–D...... Above JaD Sun disk over 1 Armant [Thebes] wig pBruxelles MRAH E. pChicago OIM 9787 4976...... Above JaD 2 2 3 (pRyerson)...... Above JaD 2 [Thebes] Black wig [Thebes] B: red pParis Louvre pParis Louvre N. 3144 + N. 3153 ...... Above JaD 3 1 N. 3198 + N. 3250...... Above JaD 2 or 3 2 [Thebes]

pNew York 17 pLeiden T16...... Above JaD 2 1 . Above JaD 2 3 ∅ Amherst 35......

pTorino 1791...... pParis Louvre Above JaD 2 2 N. 3152 ..... Above JaD 2 1 [Thebes] pBerlin P. 3008...... 3 Above JaD 1 Black wig pBoston MFA F: no color 92.2582..... Above JaD 2 115 [Thebes] pLondon BM 2 Above JaD 2 EA 10017...... Bright wig B: yellow pCologny CIV...... Above JaD 3 2 [Thebes] pParis BN 1/19...... 2 Above JaD 1 Yellow wig B: yellow18 pParis Louvre E. 7716 ...... Above JaD 3 2 pVaticano 38569...... Above JaD 2 2 [Thebes] [Thebes]

pParis Louvre N. 3143 + pLondon pGenf D 29 ...... Above JaD 2? 1 BM EA 9909...... Above JaD 3 2 ? [Thebes] [Thebes] –

pLondon BM 2 EA 10086...... Above JaD Ribbon across 1 [Thebes] red wig B: red 16 Only the upper part of the scene is preserved, and shows two rows of deities and the tip of the Osiris crown. It is probable that the lower half bore the weighing of the heart scene. 17 The hands are inserted between two pairs of eyes, so that twowedjat eyes lay atop of them and two feathered eyes lay beneath them. 15 The leg is not bent at 90º, but protrudes forward. 18 The eyes point in different directions, looking outwards.

150 151 TdE82017 Iconographic Rendering of the Notion of Purification ...Lucía Díaz-Iglesias Llanos

pLondon BM EA pToulouse 73.1.6...... Above JaD 2 2 9923 ... Above JaD 3 2 [Thebes] [Thebes]

pLondon BM EA 3 pTorino 1794...... Above JaD 2 or 3 2 – 9946..... Above JaD rnpt-sign over 1 ∅ wig pTorino 1799...... 2 pLondon BM EA Above JaD or Above JaD 2 2 2 [Thebes] Dark wig 9976...... 125 B19 B: bright

pLondon BM EA pTorino 1808...... 3 Above JaD 2 75042...... Above JaD 2 2 [Thebes] Black wig [Thebes] B: yellow pBerlin P. 3151 pLiverpool A–E ...... Above JaD 3 2 ...1978.291.264 Above JaD 3 2 [Thebes] Hissaya

pDublin 1664...... Temple of Deir Above JaD 3 1 [Thebes] el-Medina Above JaD 3 1 22 Thebes pDublin 1669 + pUnknown 2 or 3 Above JaD 1 Provenance...... Black wig [Thebes] 8. Ptolemaic Period, Memphis: mummy http://libweb2.princeton.edu/rbsc2/papy- pGenf 23464/1–6...... Above JaD 2 2 bandages ri/ BookoftheDeadRoll8.html. [Thebes] Kockelmann 2008: II, 269–270, Anm. 236; pLeiden T1...... 3 Totenbuchprojekt Bonn, TM 14129, ,.a 26th Dynasty date is given. pLondon BM EA 3 20 10043...... Above 125 B 1 Band across wig ...... [Thebes] Object protected/ Nº Inv / Provenance Location Type of figure Body posture Attitude offered pLondon BM EA Above JaD or 125 10370 B...... 3 1 ? –? M. Princeton pha­ B21 raonic roll No 8 Above JaD 4 2 [Thebes] B: red [Memphis] pLondon BM EA 73671...... Above JaD 2 2 [Thebes] 9. Ptolemaic– Roman Period, Middle 458, 460, 462–463, 496, 507 (suggests pParis Louvre N. 3088 ...... Above JaD 3 3 Egypt: papyri date between 200 BC and the Roman Pe- [Thebes] riod), 650 (style 2), points to its similari- pUnknown prove- pChicago OIM 10486 (= pMilbank); Oriental ty to pNew York MMA 35.9.21, from Meir; nance Irti-rw...... Above JaD 3 1 ? Institute Museum, University of Chicago; Jrtj- Mosher 2001: 20, n. 119 and 23 n. 134, sug- w-r-w; Ptolemaic–Roman; Middle Egypt (?). gests that pChicago OIM 10486, pLon- Allen 1960: Pl. LXXX–LXXXI. don BM EA 10558, and pNew York MMA Bellion 1987: 129; Mosher 1990: 116–117, 35.9.20 belong to a common tradition of

19 Only the upper half is preserved. 20 The hands are inserted between two pair of eyes, so that the wedjat eyes are atop them, and the feathered eyes are beneath them. 22 The whole of an almond shape eye, and not only the pupil, has been represented. The image reproduced by Lepsius 21 Only the upper half is preserved. (LD IV, 16 b) is not accurate.

152 153 TdE82017 Iconographic Rendering of the Notion of Purification ...Lucía Díaz-Iglesias Llanos

Middle Egypt, based on Memphite pro- rus (or at least its master copy) originat- http://www.british museum.org Dynasty and the Ptolemaic Period; Taw- totypes with additional Theban elements ed in Meir; Totenbuchprojekt Bonn, TM Totenbuchprojekt Bonn, TM 57241, . Bonn, TM 56950, . objekt/tm56950>. pNew York MMA 66.9.142; Metropolitan Mu- PA-dj-wnwt Object protected/ seum of Art; 332–320 BC; damaged image. pTorino 1812; Museo Egizio; ; good Nº Inv / Provenance Location Type of figure Body posture Attitude offered Totenbuchprojekt Bonn, TM 57354, . Néret 2002 [1995]: 250–251 (A. Vol. II, Pl. pChicago OIM 23 10486...... Above 125 2 1 72). pParis BN 47–51; Bibliothèque Nationale; Totenbuchprojekt Bonn, TM 57593, . damaged image. 10. Ptolemaic Period, pBerlin P. 3015 A+B; Ägyptisches Museum und Totenbuchprojekt Bonn, TM 57381, . goriano Egizio; ; fragmentary state. preservation. Bellion 1987: 317, dates it to the 22nd Dy- pParis BN 129–136; Bibliothèque Nationale; nasty; Tawfik 2008: 279 (Kat. 134); Toten- pVaticano 38568 (=Vaticano 17); Museo Grego- Luft 1974: 36; Totenbuchprojekt Bonn, TM ©Hwty-jry-dj=s-wrs; good state of preserva- buchprojekt Bonn, TM 57644, . good state of preservation. tm57090>. http://gallica.bnf.fr Gasse 1993: Pl. XLI. Budek 2008: 21; Totenbuchprojekt Bonn, pZagreb 604; Archeoloski Musej, Baron von Seeber 1976: 227 (107), compares it to pVati- pBerlin P. 3156; Ägyptisches Museum und Papy- TM 57386, . preservation. the “Theban-y Tradition”; Totenbuchprojekt Luft 1974: 21; Budek 2008: 8–9; Tawfik 2008: Mosher 2016: 11–12, suggests that the pa- Bonn, TM 57187, . TM 57106, . ; good state of preservation. Ptolemaic source; Totenbuchprojekt Bonn, Botti 1964: Pl. 12. TM 134896, . 250–150 BC; good state of preservation. pPrivate Collection Sydney (without number); http://www.british museum.org Ns-Mnw; good state of preservation. Object protected/ Fazzini and Bianchi 1988: 236–237 (Cat. 127); Catalogue Sotheby’s Auction, Sotheby’s An- Nº Inv / Provenance Location Type of figure Body posture Attitude Quirke 1993: 43 (103), 76, n. 103 (Thebes is tiquities, London 10th July 1990: 117. offered mentioned as place of provenance in Anasta- Seeber 1976: 226 (73); Bellion 1987: 264, dates pVaticano 38568...... 24 Above JaD 2 1 si’s register); Mosher, 2016: 33–34, assigns it it between the 26th Dynasty and the Ptole- to the tradition of the “Later HG Set”; Toten- maic Period; Coenen 2006: 88, n. 2; Budek buchprojekt Bonn, TM 57036, . siders it comes from Thebes; Mosher 2010: 125, 127, fig. 15–16, 137, passim, assigns it to pBangor; Penrhyn Castle; 1) ¦A-arjj, 2) PA-wn; ca. style 1 and to the tradition of the “BM 10086 pBangor...... Above JaD 2 or 3 1 332–330 BC; fragmentary state. group”. . Tawfik 2008: 245 (Kat. 56); Totenbuch- pBerlin P. 3015 Above JaD or 2 2 projekt Bonn, TM112431, . PA-dj-¡rw-pA-Xrd; good state of preservation.

24 The right-hand palm faces upwards while the left one faces downwards. 23 The eye is simplified and does not bear the vertical addition. 25 Only the upper half is preserved.

154 155 TdE82017 Iconographic Rendering of the Notion of Purification ...Lucía Díaz-Iglesias Llanos

pBerlin P 3156...... Baines, J. Budek, J. Above JaD 2 1 1985 Fecundity Figures: Egyptian Personification 2008 “Die Sonnelaufszene. Untersuchungen and the Iconology of a Genre. Warminster. zur Vignette 15 des Altägyptischen Toten- pPrivate Collection Sesto Congresso Interna­ buches während der Spät- und Ptolemäer- Sydney...... Above JaD 2 1 1992 “Open palms”, in: zionale di Egittologia, Atti. Torino: I, 29–32. zeit”, SAK 37: 18–48.

pLondon BM EA 9963...... Above JaD 3 1 ∅ Barwik, M. Buroh, K.; Jürgens, P.; Müller-Wollermann 1995 “Du Nouveau sur le Papyrus de Pacheren- R.; Scholz, S.; Ziedler, J. pNew York MMA Above JaD 2 or 3 2 min au Musée Czartoryski à Cracovie”, 1985 Hieroglyphenschrift und Totenbuch. Die Papy- 66.9.142...... RdE 46: 3–7. ri der Ägyptischen Sammlung der Universität Tübingen. Tübingen. pParis BN 47–51...... Above JaD 3 1 Bellion, M. pParis BN 129–136...... 1987 Egypte ancienne: catalogue des manuscrits Cecil, L.W. Above JaD 3 1 hiéroglyphiques et hiératiques et des dessins 1903 “Report on the Work Done at Asuan”, pParma 106...... sur papyrus, cuir ou tissu, publiés ou signalés. ASAE 4: 51–73. Above JaD 3 1 Doctoral dissertation, École Pratique des Hautes Études. pTorino 1812...... Coenen, M. Above JaD 2 1 1999a “The Greco-Roman Mortuary Papyri in Bickel, S. the National Museum of Antiquities at . pVaticano 38602...... Above JaD 2 ? 2001 “Entre angoisse et espoir : Le Livre des Lei­den”, OMRO 79: 67–79. Morts”, in: J.-L. Chappaz and S. Vuilleu­ 1999b “The Egyptian Funerary Papyri in the pZagreb 604...... Above JaD 2 2 mier (eds.): Sortir au Jour. Art Égyptien de Bodleian Library”, The Bodleian Library Re- la Fondation Martin Bodmer (CSEG 7), Ge- cord 16 n º 6: 450–469. nève: 117–134. 2000 “The Funerary Papyri of the Bodleian Li- brary at Oxford”, JEA 86: 81–98. Bienkowski, P.; Tooley, A. Bibliography Aufrère, S.H. 2001 “On the Demise of the Book of the Dead 1995 Gifts of the Nile: Ancient Egyptian Arts and 2015 “Au pays de l’Œil d’Horus et de l’Œil in Ptolemaic Thebes”, RdE 52: 69–84. Crafts in Liverpool Museum. London. d’Osiris ou l’Égypte comme regard du 2006 “A Preliminary Survey of the Books of the Dead on Papyrus and Linen in the Abitz, F. faucon divin (modèle: Falco peregrinus Bonnet, H. Nichol­son Museum”, in: K. Sowada and 1995 Pharao als Gott in den Unterweltsbüchern pelegrinoides, TEMMINCK 1829) – Pre- mière Partie”, in: M. Massiera, B. Mathieu, 2000 [1952] Reallexikon der ägyptischen Religionsge- B. Ockin­ga (eds.): Egyptian Art in the Ni­ des Neuen Reiches (OBO 146). Freiburg, and Fr. Rouffet (eds.): Apprivoiser le sau- schichte. Hamburg. cholson Museum, Sydney, Sydney: 81–89, Göttingen. vage / Taiming the Wild (CENiM 11), Mont- Pls. 13–16. pellier: 31–47. Botti, G. Albert, F. 1964 I Cimeli egizi del Museo di Antichità di Parma. Curtis, N.G.W.; Kockelmann, H.; Munro, I. 2006 “La composition du Livre des Morts Tar- Ayrton, E.R.; Currelly, C.T, ;Weigall, Firenze. 2005 “The Collection of Book of the Dead Man­ ­ dif. Des Traditions Locales aux Traditions A.E.P.B. uscripts in Marischal Museum, University ‘Scripturales’, Égypte Afrique et Orient 43: 1904 Abydos Part III. London. Du Bourget, P.; Gabolde, L. of Aberdeen, Scotland: A Comprehensive 39–46. 2002 Le Temple de Deir al-Médîna (MIFAO 121). Le Overview”, BIFAO 105: 49–73. Backes, B. Caire. Allen, T.G. 2010 “Three Funerary Papyri from Thebes: New D’Auria, S.; Lacovara, P.; Roehring, C.H. 1960 The Egyptian Book of the Dead: Documents in Evidence on Scribal and Funerary Practice Brunner-Traut, E. 1988 Mummies and Magic – The Funerary Arts of the Oriental Institute Museum at the Universi- in the Late Period”, BMSAES 15: 1–21. 1977 s.u. Gesten, in E. Otto and W. Helck (eds.): Ancient Egypt. Boston. ty of Chicago (OIP 82). Chicago. LÄ. Wiesbaden: II, 573–585. Backes, B.; Gülden, S.A.; Kockelmann, H.; Daumas, F. Assmann, J. Müller-Roth, M.; Munro, I.; Stöhr, S. Brunner-Traut, E.; Brunner, H. 1988–1995 Valeurs phonétiques des signes hiérogly­ 1991 Das Grab des Amenemope (TT 41) (Theben 3). 20092 Bibliographie zum Altägyptischen Totenbuch 1981 Die Ägyptische Sammlung der Universität phiques d’époque gréco-romaine (Or Monsp Mainz am Rhein. (SAT 13). Wiesbaden. Tübingen. Mainz am Rhein. IV). Montpellier.

156 157 TdE82017 Iconographic Rendering of the Notion of Purification ...Lucía Díaz-Iglesias Llanos

Deveria, Th. Faulkner, R.O.; Andrews, C. Grieshammer, R. Lapp, G. 1872 Le Papyrus de Nebqued. Paris. 2000 [1985] The Ancient Egyptian Book of the Dead. 1970 Das Jenseitsgericht in den Sargtexten (ÄA 20). 2004 The Papyrus of Nebseni (BM EA 9900) (Cat- New York. Wiesbaden. alogue of the Books of the Dead in the British Díaz-Iglesias Llanos, L. Museum 3). London. 2005 “Commentary on Heracleopolis Magna Faulkner, R.O.; Goelet, O.; Dassow, E.; Von Griffiths, J.G. 2008 Totenbuch Spruch 125: Synoptische Textaus- gabe nach Quellen des Neuen Reiches (TbT 3). from the Theological Perspective (I): the Wasserman, J. 1960 The Conflict of Horus and Seth from Egyp- Basel. Image of the Local Lakes in the Vignette 1994 The Egyptian Book of the Dead: the Book of tian and Classical Sources: a Study in Ancient of Chapter 17 of the Book of the Dead”, 2015 Die Vignette zu Spruch 15 auf Totenbuch-papy- Going forth by Day: Being the Papyrus of Ani Mythol­ogy (Liverpool Monographs in Archae- TdE 4: 31–106. (Royal Scribe of the Divine Offerings) ri des Neuen Reiches (BAÄ 6). Basel. . San ology and Oriental Studies). Liverpool. 2009 “Heracleópolis Magna, lecturas desde Francisco. la especulación teológica (II): la purifi- Leemans, C. Guillevic, J.C.; Ramond, P. cación en los lagos de la ciudad”, TdE 5 (1): Fazzini, R.A.; Bianchi, R.S. 1840 Description raisonée des monumens égyptiens 191–204. 1975 Le papyrus Varille. Un Libre des Morts 1988 Cleopatra’s Egypt: Age of the Ptolemies. du Musée d’Antiquités des Pays-Bas de Leide. 2013 “Relación iconográfica y espacial entre d’époque ptolémaique. Toulouse. Brooklyn. Leiden. dos componentes de las viñetas de BD 17 1842–1905 Aegyptische Monumenten van het Neder­ y 125”, in: S. Carro Martín et al. (eds.): Hermann, A. landsche Museum van Oudheden te Leyden Medi­terraneos: An Interdisciplinary Ap- Feucht, E. 1936 “Das Grab eines Nachtmin in Unternu­ vol. III. Monumenten behoorende tot de Grav- proach to the Cultures of the Mediterranean 1985 Das Grab des Nefersecheru (TT 296) (Theben bien”, MDAIK 6: 1–40, Taf. 1–5. en Lijkpapyrus (T.1). Leiden. Sea, Newcastle upon Tyne: 507–524. 2). Mainz am Rhein. 2014 El ciclo mítico de Heracleópolis Magna. Con- Lefebure, E. tinuidad y reelaboración a partir de las fuentes Gabolde, M. Hofmann, E. 1889 Les hypogées royaux de Thèbes, seconde divi- funerarias y cultuales (Aula Ægyptiaca-Studia 1995 “L’inondation sous les pieds d’Amon”, 2004 Bilder im Wandel: die Kunst der ramessid­ sion: Notices des Hypogées (MMAF 3. 1). Le 7). Bellaterra. BIFA­O 95: 235–258. ischen Privatgräber (Theben 17). Mainz am Caire. Rhein. Dominicus, B. Gasse, A. Lenzo Marchese, G. 1994 Gesten und Gebärden in Darstellungen des 1993 Les papyrus hiératiques et hiéroglyphiques du Kákosy, L. 2010 “The Two Funerary Papyri of Queen Ned- Alten und Mittleren Reiches (SAGA 10). Museo gregoriano egizio (Museo Gregoriano 1979 “Temples and Funerary Beliefs in the jmet (P. BM EA 10490 and P. BM EA 10541 Heidelberg. Egizio, Aegyptiaca Gregoriana I). Città del Graeco-Roman Epoch”, in: L’Égyptologie + Louvre E. 6258)”, BMSAES 15: 63–83. Vaticano. en 1979, Axes prioritaires de recherches, Paris: Donadoni-Roveri, A.M. 2001 Le Livre des morts de Pacherientaihet I, 117–127. Lepsius, R. 1988 Civilta’ degli Egizi. Le Credenze Religiose. au Museo gregoriano egizio. Città del 1842 Das Todtenbuch der Ägypter nach dem hiero- Milano, Torino. Vaticano. Karig, J.S. glyphischen papyrus in Turin. Leipzig. 1989 Dal Museo al Museo. Passato e futuro del Mu- 2002 Un papyrus et son scribe: le Livre des morts 1968 “Die Kultkammer des Amenhotep aus seo Egizio di Torino. Torino. Va­tican: Museo gregoriano egizio 48832. Deir Durunka”, ZÄS 95, 27–34, Abb. 1–2. Limme, L. Paris. Eaton, K. 1983 “Trois Livres des Morts illustrés des Mu- sées royaux d’Art et d’Histoire à Bru­ 2013 Ancient Egyptian Temple Ritual. Perfor- Germer, R. Kees, H. xelles”, in: H. De Meulenaere and L. mance, Pattern and Practice (Routledge Stud- 1997 Mummies. Life after Death in Ancient Egypt. 1956 Totenglauben und Jenseitsvorstellungen der al- ies in Egyptology 1). Oxford, New York. ten Ägypter. Grundlagen und Entwicklung bis Limme (eds.): Artibus Aegypti. Studia in ho­ Münich, New York. norem Bernard V. Bothmer a colleges amicis zum Ende des Mittleren Reichs. Berlin. Einaudi, S. discipulis conscripta quae curaverunt, Bru­ Glanville, S.R.K. xelles: 81–99. 2007 “The ‘Tomb of Osiris’: An Ideal Burial 1927 “Note on the Nature and Date of the “Pa- Kockelmann, H. Model?”, in: J.C. Goyon and C. Cardin pyri” of Nakht, B.M. 10471 and 10473”, 2008 Untersuchungen zu den späten Totenbuch- (eds.): Proceedings of the Ninth Internatio­nal Lise, G. JEA 13, n º 1/2: 50–56, Pls. XIX–XXI. Handschriften auf Mumienbinden (SÄT 12). Congress of Egyptologists (OLA 150.2), Leu- 1979 Museo Archeologico Raccolta Egizia. Milano. Wiesbaden. ven: 475–485. Goyon, J.-Cl. Lucarelli, R. Faulkner, R.O. 1967 “Le Cérémonial de Glorification d’Osiris Koemoth, P.P. 2006 The Book of the Dead of Gatseshen: Ancient 1962 A Concise Dictionary of Middle Egyptian. du Papyrus du Louvre I. 3079 (lignes 110 à 1996 “Osiris-Lune, l’horizon et l’œil oudjat”, Egyptian Funerary Religion in the 10th Centu- Oxford. 112)”, BIFAO 65: 89–156. CdE 71 / 142: 203–220. ry BC (EU 21). Leiden.

158 159 TdE82017 Iconographic Rendering of the Notion of Purification ...Lucía Díaz-Iglesias Llanos

Luft, U. 2010 “An Intriguing Theban Book of the Dead Tra- Newberry, P.E. Quirke, S. 1974 “Aus der Geschichte der Berliner Papyrus- dition in the Late Period”, BMSAES 15: 123–172. 1899 The Amherst Papyri: being an Account of the 1993 Owners of Funerary Papyri in the British Mu- Sammlung. Erwerbungen und Ankäufe 2016 The Book of the Dead. Saite through- Ptole Egyptian Papyri in the Collection of the Right seum (BMOP 92). London. orientalischer Papyri zwischen 1828 und maic Periods. A Study of Traditions Evident Hon. Lord Amherst of Hackney, F.S.A. at Did- 2013 Going out in Daylight – prt m hrw. The -An 1861”, Archiv für Papyrusforschung und ver- in Versions of Texts and Vignettes. Volume lington Hall, Norfolk. London. cient Egyptian Book of the Dead: Translations, wandte Gebiete, 22–23: 5–46. 1 (BD Spells 1–15) (SPBDStudies). North Sources, Meanings (GHP Egyptology 20). 1977 “Das Totenbuch des Ptahmose Papyrus Charlestone. Neret, G. London. Kraków MNK IX – 752 / 1–4”, ZÄS 104: 2002 [1995] Description de l’Égypte. Publiée par les Müller, I. Radwan, A. 46–75, Taf. I–III. ordres de Napoléon Bonaparte. Köln. 1985 “Totenbuch der Ta-rudj genannt Nai- 2015 “Neferu Re und Neferu Osiris (Liverpool- Lüscher, B. nai”, in Nofret die Schöne: die Frau im alten Stele 49–56)”, in: L.D. Morenz and A. El NiwiŃski, A. 2007 Totenbuch-Papyrus Neuchâtel Eg. 429 und Ägypten: “Wahrheit” und Wirklichkeit, Roe­ Hawary (eds.): Weitergabe. Fetschrift für Ur- 1985 “Miscellanea de Deir el-Bahari”, MDAIK Princeton Pharaonic Roll 2. Zur Totenbuch- mer- und Pelizaeus-Museum, Hildesheim sula Rößler-Köhler zum 65. Geburtstag (GOF 15. Juli 1985-4 November 1985, 41: 197–227, Taf. 28–35. IV.53), Wiesbaden: 351–359. Tradition von Deir el-Medina (BAÄ 1). Basel. Mainz am Rhein: 148–151, Nr. 174. 1989 Studies on the Illustrated Theban Funerary Pa- 2010 “In the Footsteps of Edouard Naville pyri of the 11th and 10th Centuries B.C. (OBO (1844–1926)”, BMSAES 15: 103–121. Rössler-Köhler, U. Müller-Roth, M. 86). Freiburg, Göttingen. 1979 Kapitel 17 des ägyptischen Totenbuches: Un- 2008 “Der Kranz der Rechtfertigung”, in: B. 2006 “The Book of the Dead on the Coffins of tersuchungen zur Textgeschichte und Funktion Meeks, D. Rothöhler and A. Manisali (eds.): Mythos the 21st Dynasty”, in: B. Backes, I. Munro, eines Textes der altägyptischen Totenliteratur 1979 “Pureté et Impureté. Ancien Orient”, in: & Ritual: Festschrift für Jan Assmann zum 70. and S. Stöhr (eds.): Totenbuch-Forschungen: (GOF IV.10). Wiesbaden. Dic- H. Cazelles and A. Feuillet (eds.): Geburtstag, Münster: 143–162. gesammelte Beiträge des 2. Internationalen To- 1999 Zur Tradierungsgeschichte des Totenbuches tionnaire de la Bible, Supplement X, Paris: 2009 “Lokalkolorit in Schwarz-Weiss”, in: B. tenbuch-Symposiums, Bonn, 25. bis 29. Sep- zwischen der 17. und 22. Dynastie (Tb 17) (SAT 430–452. Backes, M. Müller-ROth, and S. Stöhr tember 2005 (SAT 11), Wiesbaden: 245–260, 3). Wiesbaden. (eds.): Ausgestattet mit den Schriften des Thot: Pls. 1–5. Milde, H. Festschrift für Irmtraut Munro zu ihrem 65. Saleh, M. The Vignettes in the Book of the Dead of Nefer- 1991 Geburtstag (SÄT 14), Wiesbaden: 119–131. Piankoff, A.; Rambova, N. 1984 Das Totenbuch in den thebanischen Beamten- renpet (EU 7). Leiden. 1957 Mythological Papyri: Texts and Plates (Bol- gräbern des Neuen Reiches: Texte und Vi- Munro, I. lingen Series 40, Egyptian Religious Texts and gnetten (AV 46). Mainz am Rhein. Mosher, M. 1988 Untersuchungen zu den Totenbuch-Papyri der Representations 3). New York. 1990 The Ancient Egyptian Book of the Dead in the 18. Dynastie: Kriterien ihrer Datierung (Stud- Saleh, M.; Sourouzian, H. Late Period: a Study of Revisions Evident in ies in Egyptology). London, New York. 1987 Official Catalogue. The Egyptian Museum -Cai Piotrovsky, M. Evolving Vignettes, and the Possible Chronolog- 1994 Die Totenbuch-Handschriften des 18. Dynas- ro. Cairo, Mainz am Rhein. 1974 Egyptian Antiquities in the Hermitage. ical or Geographical Implications for Differing tie im ägyptischen Museum Cairo (ÄA 54). Leningrad. Versions of Vignettes. Doctoral dissertation, Wiesbaden. Schott, E. University of California, Berkeley. 2001 Spruchvorkommen auf Totenbuch-Textzeugen 1992 Die Ägyptischen Sünden. Kapitel 125 und 1992 “Theban and Memphite Book of the Dead der dritten Zwischenzeit (SAT 5). Wiesbaden. Quack, J.F. Kapitel 30 des ägyptischen Totenbuches über- Traditions in the Late Period”, JARCE 29: 2006 Review of “Lapp, G. The Papyrus of Neb- 2013 “Conceptions of Purity in Egyptian Re- setzt und kommentiert. Göttingen. 143–172. seni (BM EA 9900)”, JEA 92: 293–294. ligion”, in: Chr. Frevel and Chr. Nihan 2001 The Papyrus of Hor (BM EA 10479): with Pa- 2010 “Evidence of a Master Copy Transferred (eds.): Purity and the Forming of Religious Seeber, C. pyrus MacGregor: The Late Period Tradition at from Thebes to the Memphis Area in Dy- Traditions in the Ancient Mediterranean World 1976 Untersuchungen zur Darstellung des Toten­ Akhmim (Catalogue of the Books of the Dead in nasty 26”, BMSAES 15: 201–224. and Ancient Judaism (Dynamics in the Histo- gerichts im alten Ägypten (MÄS 35). the British Museum 2). London. ry of Religion 3), Leiden, Boston: 115–158. München, Berlin. 2008 “Five Versions of Spell 19 from the Late Pe- Munro, P. riod Book of the Dead”, in S.E. Thompson 1973 Die spätägyptischen Totenstelen (Ägyptolog­ Quaegebeur, J. Servajean, F. and P. Der Manuelian (eds.): Egypt and Be- ische Forschungen 25). Glückstadt. 1975 Le Dieu égyptien Shaï dans la réligion et 2001 “Le Lotus émergeant et les quatre fils yond: Essays Presented to Leonard H. Lesko l’onomastique (OLA 2). Leuven. d’Horus: Analyse d’une métaphore physio­ upon his Retirement from the Wilbour Chair Naville, E. 1979 “La situle décorée de Nesnakhetiou au logique”, in: S.H. Aufrère (ed.): Encyclo- of Egyptology at Brown University, June 2005, 1886 Das aegyptische Todtenbuch der XVIII. bis XX. Musée Royal de Mariemont”, CdÉ 54: pédie religieuse de l’univers vegetal (Or Monsp Brown University: 237–260. Dynastie. Berlin. 40–48. XI), Montpellier: 261–295.

160 161 TdE82017

Shorter, A.W. Verhoeven, U. 1938 Catalogue of Egyptian Religious Papyri in the 1993 Das saitische Totenbuch der Iahtesnacht: P. Co- British Museum. London. lon. Aeg. 10207 (PTA 41/ 1–3). Bonn. 2001 Untersuchungen zur späthieratischen Buch- Siliotti, A.; Leblanc, Chr. schrift (OLA 99). Leuven. 1993 Nefertari e la Valle delle Regine. Firenze. Westendorf, A. Smith, W.S. 2001 Altägyptische Darstellungen des Sonnenlaufes 1960 Ancient Egypt as Represented in the Museum auf der abschüssigen Himmelsbahn (MÄS 10). of Fine Arts. Boston. Berlin.

Spiegel, J. Wiese, A. 1935 Die Idee vom Totengericht in der ägyptischen 2001 Antikenmuseum Basel und Sammlung Ludwig: Religion (LÄS 2). Glückstadt, Hamburg. die ägyptische Abteilung (Sonderbände der An- tiken Welt). Mainz am Rhein. Steindorff, G. 1937 Aniba, Zweiter Band (Mission Archéologique de Wild, H. Nubie 1929–1934). Glückstadt, Hamburg, 1972 “Champollion à Genève”, BIFAO 72: 1–46. New York. Wilkinson, R.H. Tawfik, T.S. 1994 Symbol & Magic in Egyptian Art. New York. 2008 Die Vignette zu Totenbuch-Kapitel 1 und ver- 1992 Reading Egyptian Art. A Hieroglyphic Guide gleichbare Darstellungen in Gräbern. Doc- to Ancient Egyptian Painting and Sculpture. toral dissertation, Rheinischen Friedrich- London. Wilhelms-Universität. Yoyotte, J. Taylor, J.H. 1961 Le Jugement des Morts dans l’Égypte Ancienne 2006 “The Coffin of Padiashaikhet”, in: K.- So (Sources Orientales IV). Paris. wada and B. Ockinga (eds.): Egyptian Art 1971 “La sépulture du père divin Psamétik, fils in the Nicholson Museum, Sydney, Sydney: de la dame Sbareky”, BSFE 60: 9–27. 264–291, Pls. 46–54. Zivie, A.P. Taylor, J.H. (ed.) 1979 La tombe de Pached à Deir El-Médineh [no. 3] 2010 Journey through the Afterlife. Ancient Egyp- (BiEg 63). Le Caire. tian Book of the Dead. London. No-author Teeter, E. 1981 Werke ägyptischer Kunst von der Frühzeit bis 2003 Ancient Egypt: Treasures from the Collection of zur spätantike: aus zwei schweizer Sammlun- the Oriental Institute (OIMP 23). Chicago. gen und anderem Privatnbesitz. Basel.

Thausing, G.; Goedicke, H. 1971 Nofretari, Eine Dokumentation de Wandgemäl- de ihres Grabes. Graz.

Valloggia, M. 2001 “Les manuscrits hiératiques et hiérogly­ phiques de la Bibliotheca Bodmeriana”, in: J.-L. Chappaz and S. Vuilleumier (eds.): Sortir au Jour. Art Égyptien de la fondation Martin Bod- mer (CSEG 7), Genève: 135–145, fig. 3–5.

Adoratriz del Dios. Isabel Sánchez Marqués. 162