DOCSLIB.ORG

Programmatic Environmental Assessment for Army 2020 Force Structure Realignment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Programmatic Environmental Assessment for Army 2020 Force Structure Realignment Programmatic Environmental Assessment for Army 2020 Force Structure Realignment Chapter 4 Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences Section 4.16 Fort Polk, Louisiana Section 4.17 Fort Riley, Kansas Section 4.18 Schofield Barracks and U.S. Army Garrison Hawai’i Section 4.19 Fort Sill, Oklahoma Section 4.20 Fort Stewart, Georgia Section 4.21 Fort Wainwright, Alaska Section 4.22 Summary of Potential Environmental Impacts Section 4.23 Conclusion Section 4.24 Cumulative Effects January 2013 Assisted by: Potomac-Hudson Engineering, Inc. Gaithersburg, MD 20878 This page intentionally left blank. Army 2020 Force Structure Realignment Programmatic Environmental Assessment January 2013 1 Table of Contents 2 4.16 FORT POLK, LOUISIANA ...................................................................... 4.16-1 3 4.16.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 4.16-1 4 4.16.1.1 Valued Environmental Components ............................................................ 4.16-3 5 4.16.1.2 Valued Environmental Components Dismissed from Detailed Analysis ...... 4.16-3 6 4.16.2 Air Quality ........................................................................................................ 4.16-8 7 4.16.2.1 Affected Environment .................................................................................. 4.16-8 8 4.16.2.2 Environmental Consequences ..................................................................... 4.16-8 9 No Action Alternative ................................................................................................... 4.16-8 10 Alternative 1: Force Reduction (up to 5,300 Soldiers and Army Civilians) .................. 4.16-8 11 Alternative 2: Installation gain of up to 1,000 Combat/Combat Support Soldiers resulting 12 from Brigade Combat Team Restructuring and Unit Realignments ............................ 4.16-9 13 4.16.3 Soil Erosion ..................................................................................................... 4.16-9 14 4.16.3.1 Affected Environment .................................................................................. 4.16-9 15 4.16.3.2 Environmental Consequences ................................................................... 4.16-10 16 No Action Alternative ................................................................................................. 4.16-10 17 Alternative 1: Force Reduction (up to 5,300 Soldiers and Army Civilians) ................ 4.16-10 18 Alternative 2: Installation gain of up to 1,000 Combat/Combat Support Soldiers resulting 19 from Brigade Combat Team Restructuring and Unit Realignments .......................... 4.16-10 20 4.16.4 Wetlands ....................................................................................................... 4.16-11 21 4.16.4.1 Affected Environment ................................................................................ 4.16-11 22 4.16.4.2 Environmental Consequences ................................................................... 4.16-11 23 No Action Alternative ................................................................................................. 4.16-11 24 Alternative 1: Force Reduction (up to 5,300 Soldiers and Army Civilians) ................ 4.16-11 25 Alternative 2: Installation gain of up to 1,000 Combat/Combat Support Soldiers resulting 26 from Brigade Combat Team Restructuring and Unit Realignments .......................... 4.16-11 27 4.16.5 Water Resources ........................................................................................... 4.16-11 28 4.16.5.1 Affected Environment ................................................................................ 4.16-11 29 4.16.5.2 Environmental Consequences ................................................................... 4.16-13 30 No Action Alternative ................................................................................................. 4.16-13 31 Alternative 1: Force Reduction (up to 5,300 Soldiers and Army Civilians) ................ 4.16-13 32 Alternative 2: Installation gain of up to 1,000 Combat/Combat Support Soldiers resulting 33 from Brigade Combat Team Restructuring and Unit Realignments .......................... 4.16-13 34 4.16.6 Facilities ........................................................................................................ 4.16-13 35 4.16.6.1 Affected Environment ................................................................................ 4.16-13 36 4.16.6.2 Environmental Consequences ................................................................... 4.16-14 37 No Action Alternative ................................................................................................. 4.16-14 38 Alternative 1: Force Reduction (up to 5,300 Soldiers and Army Civilians) ................ 4.16-14 39 Alternative 2: Installation gain of up to 1,000 Combat/Combat Support Soldiers resulting 40 from Brigade Combat Team Restructuring and Unit Realignments .......................... 4.16-14 41 4.16.7 Socioeconomics ............................................................................................ 4.16-14 42 4.16.7.1 Affected Environment ................................................................................ 4.16-14 43 4.16.7.2 Environmental Consequences ................................................................... 4.16-19 44 No Action Alternative ................................................................................................. 4.16-19 45 Alternative 1: Force Reduction (up to 5,300 Soldiers and Army Civilians) ................ 4.16-19 46 Alternative 2: Installation gain of up to 1,000 Combat/Combat Support Soldiers resulting 47 from Brigade Combat Team Restructuring and Unit Realignments .......................... 4.16-22 48 4.16.8 Land Use Conflicts and Compatibility ............................................................ 4.16-24 49 4.16.8.1 Affected Environment ................................................................................ 4.16-24 50 4.16.8.2 Environmental Consequences ................................................................... 4.16-25 Table of Contents i Army 2020 Force Structure Realignment Programmatic Environmental Assessment January 2013 1 No Action Alternative ................................................................................................. 4.16-25 2 Alternative 1: Force Reduction (up to 5,300 Soldiers and Army Civilians) ............... 4.16-25 3 Alternative 2: Installation gain of up to 1,000 Combat/Combat Support Soldiers resulting 4 from Brigade Combat Team Restructuring and Unit Realignments .......................... 4.16-25 5 4.16.9 Hazardous Materials and Hazardous Waste ................................................. 4.16-26 6 4.16.9.1 Affected Environment ................................................................................ 4.16-26 7 4.16.9.2 Environmental Consequences ................................................................... 4.16-26 8 No Action Alternative ................................................................................................. 4.16-26 9 Alternative 1: Force Reduction (up to 5,300 Soldiers and Army Civilians) ................ 4.16-26 10 Alternative 2: Installation gain of up to 1,000 Combat/Combat Support Soldiers resulting 11 from Brigade Combat Team Restructuring and Unit Realignments .......................... 4.16-26 12 4.16.10 Traffic and Transportation ............................................................................. 4.16-27 13 4.16.10.1 Affected Environment ............................................................................. 4.16-27 14 4.16.10.2 Environmental Consequences ............................................................... 4.16-27 15 No Action Alternative ................................................................................................. 4.16-27 16 Alternative 1: Force Reduction (up to 5,300 Soldiers and Army Civilians) ................ 4.16-27 17 Alternative 2: Installation gain of up to 1,000 Combat/Combat Support Soldiers resulting 18 from Brigade Combat Team Restructuring and Unit Realignments .......................... 4.16-27 19 4.16.11 Cumulative Effects ........................................................................................ 4.16-27 20 Region of Influence .................................................................................................... 4.16-27 21 Fort Polk Projects (Past, Present, and Reasonably Foreseeable) ............................ 4.16-28 22 Past Projects ............................................................................................................. 4.16-28 23 Present Projects ........................................................................................................ 4.16-28 24 Future Projects .......................................................................................................... 4.16-28 25 Other Agency (DoD and non-DoD) and Other Public/Private Actions (Past, Present, and 26 Reasonably Foreseeable) ......................................................................................... 4.16-28 27 No Action Alternative ................................................................................................. 4.16-29 28 Alternative 1: Force Reduction (up to 5,300 Soldiers and Army Civilians) ................ 4.16-29 29 Alternative 2: Installation gain of up to 1,000 Combat/Combat Support
Load more

Recommended publications
  • United States Air Force and Its Antecedents Published and Printed Unit Histories
    UNITED STATES AIR FORCE AND ITS ANTECEDENTS PUBLISHED AND PRINTED UNIT HISTORIES A BIBLIOGRAPHY EXPANDED & REVISED EDITION compiled by James T. Controvich January 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTERS User's Guide................................................................................................................................1 I. Named Commands .......................................................................................................................4 II. Numbered Air Forces ................................................................................................................ 20 III. Numbered Commands .............................................................................................................. 41 IV. Air Divisions ............................................................................................................................. 45 V. Wings ........................................................................................................................................ 49 VI. Groups ..................................................................................................................................... 69 VII. Squadrons..............................................................................................................................122 VIII. Aviation Engineers................................................................................................................ 179 IX. Womens Army Corps............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 34, Number 2, 2012
    Kansas Preservation Volume 34, Number 2 • 2012 REAL PLACES. REAL STORIES. Historical Society Legislative Wrap-Up Historic preservation supporters spent much of the 2012 Kansas legislative Newsletter of the Cultural session advocating for the state historic preservation tax credit program amidst Resources Division Kansas Historical Society a vigorous debate over Kansas tax policy. On May 22 Governor Sam Brownback signed a comprehensive tax-cut bill that lowers personal income tax rates and eliminates state income taxes on the profits of limited liability companies, Volume 34 Number 2 subchapter S corporations, and sole proprietorships. Although the plan Contents eliminates many tax incentives, the historic tax credit program remains intact. 1 Regarding the Partnership Historic Sites donation tax credit program, there Kansas Preservation Alliance Awards was legislative support for continuing the program; however, it was not included 10 in the final bill. The program sunset in accordance with the existing statute on National Register Nominations June 30, 2012. 15 State Rehabilitation Tax Credit Read more: 18 Save the Date – Preservation Symposium kansas.com/2012/05/22/2344393/governor-signs-bill-for-massive. 19 html#storylink=cpy Project Archaeology Unit Find a copy of the bill: kslegislature.org/li/b2011_12/measures/documents/ hb2117_enrolled.pdf KANSAS PRESERVATION Correction Several sharp-eyed readers noticed the population figures listed in “A Tale of Two Published quarterly by the Kansas Historical Cities” article in the volume 34, number 1 2012 issue, mistakenly switched the Society, 6425 SW 6th Avenue, Topeka KS 66615-1099. figures for the African American population with those for all of Wichita. The Please send change of address information corrected figures for African Americans in Wichita are: page 14, 1880: 172 African to the above address or email Americans; 1890: 1,222; 1900: 1,289; 1950: 8,082.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground Water Technical Support Highlights 1995-2000
    H I G H L I G H T S Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research LaboratoryLaboratory Status Report for the Week of February 20, 19951995 REGIONAL ASSISTANCE Technical Assistance to Region I: During a telephone conversation on January 9, 1995, RPM Chet Janowski requested review comments on the “Draft Remedial Action Evaluation Study” for the Gilson Road Superfund Site in Nashua, NH. On February 8, 1995, Randall Ross (RSKERL) and Dr. Milovan Beljin (Univ. of Cincinnati) stated that the document was well written and brought together the majority of historical and recent information collected at the site. The review also discussed a few areas which were not adequately addressed, including the presence of LNAPLs at the site, the consequences of discontinuing the operation of a pump-and-treat system, and the identification of potential avenues for ground-water flow in the vicinity of the slurry wall. (90-R01-007) (R. Ross(RSKERL)405-436-8611) Technical Assistance to Region IX: The J. H. Baxter site in Weed, CA, is an operating wood treating facility that has soil and ground water contaminated with creosote, pentachlorophenol, and metals. On January 24, 1995, RPM Kathy Setian requested continuing technical assistance at the facility by reviewing the “Groundwater Remedial Design Investigation Report” and the “Supplement to the 30% Soils Remedial Design.” The February 9, 1995, response was prepared by Steve Acree (RSKERL) and Dr. Daniel Pope (Dynamac). Although no major concerns were noted regarding the conceptual treatment design, several recommendations were offered, including ways of dealing with soils contaminated with naphthalene, the need to determine the most efficient thickness of soil lifts for bioremediation, and sampling techniques.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2013 Working Copy Layout 1
    ANNUAL REPORT 2013 Adjutant General’s Department • KANSAS ARMY NATIONAL GUARD • KANSAS AIR NATIONAL GUARD • KANSAS DIVISION OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT • KANSAS HOMELAND SECURITY • CIVIL AIR PATROL ContentsContents Summary . 3 Agency History . 4 Overview 2013 . 7 Deployments . 11 Fiscal and Personnel . 12 Adjutant General’s Department Offices. 17 Sam Brownback Maj. Gen. Lee Tafanelli Governor of Kansas The Adjutant General State Offices . 19 Homeland Security . 20 Kansas Division of Emergency Management . 23 Special Programs and Facilities . 34 Joint Forces Headquarters Kansas . 38 Joint Offices . 41 Kansas Army National Guard . 47 KSARNG Offices . 61 Kansas Air National Guard. 71 Civil Air Patrol . 82 Index. 83 Adjutant General’s Department http://kansastag.gov/facebook.asp Kansas Army National Guard Kansas Air National Guard http://kansastag.gov/twitter.asp Joint Army/Air Public Affairs Office Phone: 785-274-1192 2722 S. Topeka Blvd. Cell: 785-806-4063 Rm 108 Email: [email protected] Topeka, KS, 66611 www.kansastag.gov Dear Reader, We invite you to read the latest edition of our agency annual report, which summarizes our department’s accom- plishments in 2013 and provides an overview of our agency structure, our leadership across the state, and our overall economic impact in Kansas. Our goal through this publication each year is to showcase the commitment of the men and women of this de- partment who are dedicated to doing their best for the state of Kansas. Our National Guard members and emer- gency management staff work hard to fulfill our mission of protecting life and property through planning, coordination and synchronization of state and federal resources and providing a ready military, emergency man- agement and homeland security capability for our state and nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2012 Layout 1
    AANNUALNNUAL RREPORTEPORT AdjutantAdjutant General’sGeneral’s DepartmentDepartment 20122012 •• KKANSAS AARMY NNATIONAL GGUARD •• KKANSAS AAIR NNATIONAL GGUARD •• KKANSAS DDIVISION OF EEMERGENCY MMANAGEMENT •• KKANSAS HHOMELAND SSECURITY •• CCIVIL AAIR PPATROL ContentsContents Summary . 3 Agency History . 4 Overview 2012 . 7 Deployments . 9 Fiscal and Personnel . 10 Adjutant General’s Department Offices. 15 Sam Brownback Maj. Gen. Lee Tafanelli Homeland Security . 19 Governor of Kansas The Adjutant General Kansas Division of Emergency Management . 21 Special Programs and Facilities . 33 Joint Forces Headquarters Kansas . 37 Joint Offices . 40 Kansas Army National Guard . 47 KSARNG Offices . 61 Kansas Air National Guard. 75 Civil Air Patrol . 84 Index. 85 Adjutant General’s Department http://kansastag.gov/facebook.asp Kansas Army National Guard Kansas Air National Guard http://kansastag.gov/twitter.asp Joint Army/Air Cover photos (clockwise from upper left): A convoy of Kansas National Guard humvees moves through the urban village training area at Crisis City; city and county officials address the media in Harveyville in the aftermath of the tornado that struck the town Feb. 28; pilots of the 190th Air Refueling Wing prepare to take off on a refueling mission; a Black Hawk helicopter lifts its payload during a slingload training exercise. Public Affairs Office Phone: 785-274-1192 2722 S. Topeka Blvd. Cell: 785-806-4063 Rm 108 Email: [email protected] Topeka, KS, 66611 www.kansastag.gov Dear Reader, Thank you for taking a moment to read our annual report which summarizes our agency’s accomplishments in 2012 and presents information on our agency structure, leadership, and our overall economic impact in Kansas.
    [Show full text]
  • Velocity, Speed with Direction
    Velocity Speed with Direction The Professional Career of Gen Jerome F. O’Malley ALOYSIUS G. CASEY AND PATRICK A. CASEY Air University Press Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama September 2007 Muir S. Fairchild Research Information Center Cataloging Data Casey, Aloysius G. Velocity : speed with direction : the professional career of Gen Jerome F. O’Malley / Aloysius G. Casey and Patrick Casey. p. ; cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-58566-169-5 1. O’Malley, Jerome F. 2. United States. Air Force—Officers—Biography. 3. Generals —United States—Biography. 4. Air pilots, Military—Biography. 5. Vietnam War, 1961– 1975—Aerial operations, American. I. Title. II. Casey, Patrick, 1960– 358.4/0092––dc22 Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of Air University, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other US government agency. Cleared for public release: distribution unlimited. Air University Press 131 West Shumacher Avenue Maxwell AFB, AL 36112-5962 http://aupress.maxwell.af.mil ii Contents Chapter Page DISCLAIMER . ii ABOUT THE AUTHORS . v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . vii INTRODUCTION . ix 1 The Fatal Crash . 1 2 The Hard Coal Region . 5 3 Saint Rose School . 11 4 Saint Rose Basketball . 23 5 West Point . 37 6 Diane Muennink, Silver Wings, and the Air Force Academy . 47 7 The B-47 Bomber and the General’s Aide . 63 8 The Blackbird SR-71 . 93 9 Colonel O’Malley and Combat in Country . 119 10 Combat Operations in North Vietnam . 129 11 SAC Wing Commander .
    [Show full text]
  • 11–6–06 Vol. 71 No. 214 Monday Nov. 6, 2006 Pages 64881–65034
    11–6–06 Monday Vol. 71 No. 214 Nov. 6, 2006 Pages 64881–65034 VerDate Aug 31 2005 18:08 Nov 03, 2006 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4710 Sfmt 4710 E:\FR\FM\06NOWS.LOC 06NOWS sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES II Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 214 / Monday, November 6, 2006 The FEDERAL REGISTER (ISSN 0097–6326) is published daily, SUBSCRIPTIONS AND COPIES Monday through Friday, except official holidays, by the Office PUBLIC of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration, Washington, DC 20408, under the Federal Register Subscriptions: Act (44 U.S.C. Ch. 15) and the regulations of the Administrative Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 Committee of the Federal Register (1 CFR Ch. I). The Assistance with public subscriptions 202–512–1806 Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402 is the exclusive distributor of the official General online information 202–512–1530; 1–888–293–6498 edition. Periodicals postage is paid at Washington, DC. Single copies/back copies: The FEDERAL REGISTER provides a uniform system for making Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 available to the public regulations and legal notices issued by Assistance with public single copies 1–866–512–1800 Federal agencies. These include Presidential proclamations and (Toll-Free) Executive Orders, Federal agency documents having general FEDERAL AGENCIES applicability and legal effect, documents required to be published Subscriptions: by act of Congress, and other Federal agency documents of public interest. Paper or fiche 202–741–6005 Documents are on file for public inspection in the Office of the Assistance with Federal agency subscriptions 202–741–6005 Federal Register the day before they are published, unless the issuing agency requests earlier filing.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2005 Final.Qxd
    The Adjutant General’s Department • Kansas Homeland Security • Kansas Emergency Management • Kansas Army National Guard • Kansas Air National Guard • Civil Air Patrol Annual Report 2005 150150 YYearearss ofof SerServicevice CCoonntteennttss Summaries . .3 Overview 2005 . .5 Deployments . .7 Legislative . .10 Emergency Response . .11 Homeland Security . .13 Kansas Emergency Management . .17 Military Assistance to Civil Authorities . .21 Civil Air Patrol . .22 Joint Offices Kathleen Sebelius Maj. Gen. Tod M. Bunting Governor of Kansas The Adjutant General and Programs . .23 Support Offices . .29 Non-Unit KSARNG Organizations . .35 Our History . .37 Sesquicentennial Celebration . .39 Joint Forces Headquarters Kansas . .41 Kansas Army National Guard . .43 Transistioned/ Deactivated Units . .61 Kansas Air National Guard . .65 Fiscal and Personnel . .75 ADJUTANT GENERAL’S DEPARTMENT KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Governor Major General Tod M. Bunting Dear Reader: I'm proud to present this report as an example of the commitment and dedication of the men and women of The Adjutant General’s Department of the great state of Kansas. The year covered by this report has been one unlike any other in our State or Nation's history. Thousands of Kansans serving in uniform supported by countless State and civilian employees have responded magnificently around the globe in support of the Global War on Terrorism. These men and women tirelessly responded to the call through the dedication and support of the citizens of Kansas, most notably the families and employers of our Guard men and women. Kansans are prepared and energetic in responding quickly and decisively to whatever threat faces our State and/or Nation, natural or man-made.
    [Show full text]
  • 1St Infantry Division Post Master Template
    1A HOME OF THE BIG RED ONE THE 1ST INFANTRY DIVISION POST www.riley.army.mil FRIDAY, APRIL 21, 2017 Vol. 9, No. 16 FORT RILEY, KANSAS Sgt. Takita Lawery | 19th PAD Spc. Elizabeth Payne, 19th PAD LEFT: Col. John M. Cyrulik and Command Sgt. Maj. Roque R. Quichocho, commander and senior noncommissioned officer of the 1st Combat Aviation Brigade, 1st Infantry Division, uncase the unit’s colors during a redeployment ceremony on Marshall Army Airfield April 12. The “Demon” brigade returned from an eight-month deployment to Afghanistan and the uncasing of the colors signifies the completion of the unit’s overseas mission and their return to garrison operations. RIGHT: Chief Warrant Officer 3 Steven D. Dickson II, 1st Attack Reconnaissance Battalion, 1st Aviation Regiment, 1st Combat Aviation Brigade, 1st Infantry Division, and son reunite after the CAB’s deployment to Afghanistan. Dickson was part of the final main group of Soldiers who returned to Fort Riley in a 7:15 p.m. redeployment ceremony April 15 on Marshall Army Airfield. A Homecoming to Remember ‘Demon’ brigade Soldiers return to Fort Riley By Sgt. Takita Lawery 19TH PUBLIC AFFAIRS DETACHMENT “I’m exceptionally humbled to be part of this tremendous team. They have lived up to the As children played and held up signs, waiting storied legacy of being brave, responsible and family members wiped tears on point for the nation.” away and the 1st Infantry Division Band played in the COL. JOHN M. CYRULIK background, it was a day of COMMANDER OF THE 1ST COMBAT AVIATION BRIGADE celebration at Fort Riley as hundreds of Soldiers returned home.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2011 Revised 11-22-11 Layout 1
    Kansas Adjutant General’s Department AANNUALNNUAL RREPORTEPORT 20112011 •• KKANSAS AARMY NNATIONAL GGUARD •• KKANSAS AAIR NNATIONAL GGUARD •• KKANSAS DDIVISION OF EEMERGENCY MMANAGEMENT •• KKANSAS HHOMELAND SSECURITY •• CCIVIL AAIR PPATROL ContentsContents Summary . 3 Agency History . 4 Overview 2011 . 7 Deployments . 9 Fiscal and Personnel . 11 Adjutant General’s Department Offices. 17 Sam Brownback Maj. Gen. (KS) Governor of Kansas Lee Tafanelli Homeland Security . 21 The Adjutant General Kansas Division of Emergency Management . 23 Special Programs and Facilities . 33 Joint Forces Headquarters Kansas . 37 Joint Offices . 40 Kansas Army National Guard . 45 KSARNG Offices . 59 Kansas Air National Guard. 71 Civil Air Patrol . 80 Index. 81 Adjutant General’s Department http://kansastag.gov/facebook.asp Kansas Army National Guard http://kansastag.gov/twitter.asp Kansas Air National Guard Joint Army/Air Greetings, This Annual Report is a summation of the many accomplishments achieved over the past year by the men and women of the Adjutant General’s Department. I am very proud of our employees and National Guard members who make up this agency and who work hard to protect the lives and property of their fellow citizens. I am also proud of and grateful for the personal sacri- fices of our soldiers and airmen who have deployed to Afghanistan, Iraq, Kuwait, the Horn of Africa and Asia, spreading the ideals of liberty and providing support to help make others’ lives better. During the past year, we have had our share of challenges. Some were natural – winter storms, tornadoes, floods and some of the hottest weather in years. These challenges were met with the high level of professional- ism and dedication that is always demonstrated by this agency.
    [Show full text]
  • PG Nov 2011 Layout 2
    First responders Extreme Home 184th Intelligence share rescue Makeover for Wing marks 70th skills . .6 Kansas Guards- Anniversary . .14 PlainsPlains GuardianGuardianman . .10 Volume 54 No. 6 Serving the Kansas Army and Air National Guard, Kansas Emergency Management, Kansas Homeland Security and Civil Air Patrol November 2011 Rose retires as first female general of Kansas National Guard By Steve Larson Kansas Army and Air National Guard for Public Affairs Office homeland security and for the command of Brig. Gen. Deborah Rose retired from the Joint Task Force - Kansas. She is also re- the Kansas National Guard after 28 years sponsible for formulating, developing, and of service to the state and nation. coordinating policies, plans, and programs Rose, who became the first woman to affecting the homeland security missions of earn the rank of brigadier general in the the Kansas National Guard. Kansas National Guard, was honored at a Rose entered military service with a di- retirement ceremony Oct. 1, in Hangar rect commission into the Nurse Corps in 662, 190th Air Refueling Wing, Forbes March 1983, where she remained until Field, Topeka. 1994 when the wing leadership requested “It has been an honor and privilege to she leave the Nurse Corps to take on a cru- serve the citizens of our state and nation,” cial leadership role. She was moved to a said Rose. “Throughout my career, I have line officer position where she became the been blessed to work with great Airmen 190th Service Flight commander, trans- and Soldiers. While I will miss wearing forming the organization to one of the the uniform, I know the organization is in finest in the Air National Guard.
    [Show full text]
  • US Military ALE Identifiers
    US Military ALE identifiers as of 31 March 2020 Compiled by Ron ([email protected]) This is a list of ALE identifiers used by US military (Army, Navy, Marine Corps) on HF nets. This list is compiled from my own monitoring as well as posts from other monitors around the country & in Europe. This list was started from a database first compiled several years ago by veteran monitor Mike Chace-Ortiz and posted on his now defunct web site. NOTE: All information in this file is from open sources. No classified information is knowingly included. ABBREVIATIONS AASF Army Aviation Support Facility ANG Air National Guard ArNG Army National Guard Arty Artillery Bde Brigade Btn Battalion CAB Combat Aviation Brigade CLB Combat Logistics Battalion CLR Combat Logistics Regiment Div Division JNGB Joint National Guard Base JISCC Joint Incident Site Communications Capability JOC Joint Operations Center MEB Marine Expeditionary Brigade TOC Tactical Operations Center USMC US Marine Corps IDENTIFIERS 0JOC, Utah ArNG Joint Operations Center, Draper, UT IIMEF1 poss USMC, Second Expeditionary Force Camp Lejune NC 1MLGINTMEFINTE 1st Marine Logistics Group (1st MLG) Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, CA 1MLGTACMEFTAC2 1st Marine Logistics Group (1st MLG) Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, CA 1INTELMMEFINT 1st Marine Logistics Group (1st MLG) Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, CA 101A-101st Airborne at Fort Campbell, KY 101C-101st Airborne at Fort Campbell, KY 101E-101st Airborne at Fort Campbell, KY 101AVGRD::US Army 101st Airborne 101AVTOC::US Army 101st Airborne:Avn Tactical Operations Center 100JFHWI Joint Forces Headquarters, Wisconsin National Guard Madison WI 101JFHWI Joint Forces Headquarters, Wisconsin National Guard Madison WI 105TOC32BCT 105 Cavalry Regiment 1st Squadron 32 Brigade Combat Team Wisconsin Army NG Madison WI 112ACO 1-12 Infantry 2nd Brigade Combat Team 4th Infantry Division Fort Carson, CO 112CMD 1-12 Infantry 2nd Brigade Combat Team 4th Infantry Division Fort Carson, CO 114SBN assoc w/NJ ArNG 115JISCSTATEAL South Carolina ArNG unit 1118TAC 1-118 Reg.
    [Show full text]