Diplomarbeit

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Diplomarbeit DIPLOMARBEIT Titel der Diplomarbeit Leonardo da Vincis Zeichnung „Kriegerbüste im Profil“ im Rahmen der Tradition von Helden- und Herrscherporträts sowie deren Bedeutung für Leonardos graphisches Gesamtwerk Verfasserin Katharina Fuchshuber angestrebter akademischer Grad Magistra der Philosophie (Mag. phil.) Wien, im Oktober 2007 Studienkennzahl lt. Studienblatt: A 315 Studienrichtung lt. Studienblatt: Kunstgeschichte Betreuer: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Artur Rosenauer ii iii Danksagung Die vorliegende Arbeit ist unter der Betreuung von Professor Artur Rosenauer entstanden. Für seinen fachkundigen Rat und seine umfassende Hilfsbereit- schaft möchte ich mich an dieser Stelle herzlich bedanken. Mein Dank für fachliche Auskünfte und Anregungen gilt auch den Kuratoren Hugo Chapman (British Museum, Dep. of Prints and Drawings), Alex Corney (Victoria and Albert Museum, sculpture), Claudia Cryza-Gersch (Kunsthistorisches Museum, Kunstkammer), Sylvia Ferino (Kunsthistorisches Museum, Gemäldegalerie), Michael Knuth (Berliner Staatsmuseen) und Matthias Pfaffenbichler (Kunsthistorisches Museum, Hofjagd- und Rüstkammer). Besonderer Dank gebührt meinen lieben Eltern, die mich auf meinem Bildungsweg immer verständnisvoll unterstützt haben. Für die aufwändige Arbeit des Korrekturlesens sei meiner Cousine Gudrun Kellner sowie Helene Breitenfellner gedankt. Auch Christoph Henrichs hat mit seinen hilfreichen Ideen einen wesentlichen Beitrag zu den letzten Schliffen dieser Arbeit geleistet. Con tutto il cuore vorrei ringraziare Matteo che mi ha fatto portare avanti questa tesi con il suo sostegno morale ed emotivo. Ha mostrato un gran talento nel motivarmi, tanta pazienza e mi ha dato un aiuto fondamentale non solo con le sue conoscenze informatiche. iv v INHALT 1 EINLEITUNG....................................................................................... 3 2 LEONARDO DA VINCI: KRIEGERBÜSTE IM PROFIL, BRITISH MUSEUM, LONDON........................................................................... 6 2.1 Zuschreibung............................................................................................................. 7 2.2 Zeichentechnik .......................................................................................................... 8 2.3 Datierung.................................................................................................................... 9 3 ENTSTEHUNGSUMSTÄNDE: KÜNSTLERISCHE UND KULTUR- HISTORISCHE EINFLÜSSE............................................................. 10 3.1 Andrea del Verrocchios künstlerischer Einfluss auf Leonardo und dessen Kriegerbüsten-Zeichnung ...................................................................................... 10 3.1.1 Bedeutende zeitgenössische Krieger-Reliefs in Verwandtschaft zu Leonardos Zeichnung.................................................................................................................. 12 3.1.1.1 Darius-Reliefs der Della-Robbia-Werkstatt................................................... 13 3.1.1.2 Alexander-Reliefs.......................................................................................... 16 3.1.1.3 Alexander der Große und Darius III. ikonographisch betrachtet .................. 22 3.1.2 Wechselwirkung zwischen Leonardo und Andrea del Verrocchio ............................ 25 3.1.2.1 Die Werkstatt Verrocchios ............................................................................ 25 3.1.2.2 Gemeinsame Werke Verrocchios und Leonardos........................................ 27 3.1.2.3 Parallelen zwischen ausgewählten Werken Verrocchios und der Kriegerbüsten-Zeichnung Leonardos ........................................................... 30 3.1.2.4 Leonardo nach Verrocchio oder Verrocchio nach Leonardo? ...................... 36 3.2 Die Medici als wichtige Inspirationsquelle für Leonardo und Verrocchio ........ 39 3.2.1 Die „Giostre“ der Medici ............................................................................................ 39 3.2.2 Der „all’antica“-Harnisch im Quattrocento................................................................. 43 3.2.3 Antikenentlehnung und Formerweiterung der „all’antica“-Harnische bei Leonardos Kriegerbüsten-Zeichnung und den Feldherren-Reliefs Verrocchios Nachfolger ...... 45 3.2.4 Lorenzo il Magnifico und Matthias Corvinus ............................................................. 48 3.2.5 Die Antikensammlung der Medici.............................................................................. 50 4 DIE TRADITION DER HELDEN- UND HERRSCHERPORTRÄTS .. 53 4.1 Die Vorbildwirkung antiker Münzen für Porträtdarstellungen............................ 53 4.1.1 Pisanello und Andere ................................................................................................ 54 4.1.2 Die Vorbildwirkung antiker Münzen auf Leonardo .................................................... 55 4.1.3 Giovanni Mansionarios „Historia Imperialis“ ............................................................. 56 4.1.4 Suetons Kaiserviten .................................................................................................. 57 4.1.5 Desiderios zwölf Cäsaren ......................................................................................... 59 4.1.6 Petrarcas „De Viris illustribus“ und die Zyklen der „Uomini Famosi“ ........................ 62 4.1.7 Domenico Ghirlandaios Heldenporträts in der „Sala dei Gigli” ................................. 65 4.1.8 Heldenporträt-Medaillons als Architekturdekoration ................................................. 66 4.2 Marco Zoppos phantastische Heldenporträts...................................................... 68 5 LEONARDOS MANIE DES KRIEGERTYPUS ................................. 71 5.1 Typus des reifen Mannes – Kriegerbüstentypus ................................................. 72 5.2 Typus des Jünglings............................................................................................... 80 5.3 Bedeutung der Physiognomie und Physiognomik für Leonardo ...................... 83 5.4 Identifizierung der Gesichtstypen ......................................................................... 87 6 FAZIT BEZÜGLICH DES CHARAKTERS UND DES ZWECKS LEONARDOS KRIEGERBÜSTEN-ZEICHNUNG ............................. 88 6.1 Charakter der Kriegerbüsten-Zeichnung.............................................................. 89 6.2 Zweck der Kriegerbüsten-Zeichnung.................................................................... 90 7 FAZIT BEZÜGLICH DER DATIERUNG DER KRIEGERBÜSTEN- ZEICHNUNG LEONARDOS..............................................................92 8 DER NACHHALL LEONARDOS KRIEGERBÜSTEN-ZEICHNUNG 93 8.1 Michelangelos Präsentationsblätter......................................................................93 9 RESÜMEE .........................................................................................95 10 ABBILDUNGSVERZEICHNIS .........................................................101 11 BIBLIOGRAPHIE ............................................................................106 12 ANHANG .........................................................................................115 12.1 Zusammenfassung................................................................................................117 12.2 Lebenslauf..............................................................................................................118 2 1 Einleitung Aus Leonardo da Vincis umfangreichem graphischen Werk sticht eine Zeichnung aus seiner frühen Florentiner Schaffensperiode in ihrer Präzision und aufmerksamen Detailgestaltung besonders hervor: die so genannte „Kriegerbüste im Profil“, die sich heute im British Museum in London befindet. Sie zeigt einen mit phantasiereich dekoriertem Helm und Harnisch ausgestatteten Mann mittleren Alters im strengen Profil. Dieses Blatt soll den Ausgangs- und Mittelpunkt der vorliegenden Arbeit bilden. Die Zeichnung stellt an sich eine Besonderheit dar, da sie durch eine ausgeprägte Formenharmonie und eine verblüffende stilistisch-technische Raffinesse besticht. Ihr soll das erste Kapitel gewidmet sein und das Werk in seiner Zuschreibung, Zeichentechnik und Datierung untersucht werden. Betrachtet man die Zeichnung in Zusammenhang mit Leonardos graphischem Gesamtwerk kommt ihr eine außerordentliche Rolle zu. Eine Analyse der Vielzahl seiner Studien bringt ans Licht, dass Leonardo stets an diesem im Londoner Blatt angelegten physiognomischen Typus festhält und ihn in unterschiedlichsten Kontexten seiner Arbeiten einbringt. Das Antlitz findet sich mit unterschiedlicher Haartracht, im Alter gesteigert und in der Ansicht variiert wieder – die markanten Gesichtszüge jedoch wiederholen sich in allen Beispielen und scheinen den Künstler über Jahrzehnte hin nicht mehr loszulassen. Die Kriegerbüsten-Zeichnung ist dabei die am feinsten ausgearbeitete Variante davon und stellt chronologisch gesehen das erste Beispiel Leonardos Auseinandersetzung mit diesem Gesichtstypus dar. Sie nimmt somit eine prototypische Funktion ein. Vor den Ausführungen zu Leonardos Manie des Kriegertypus, denen in Kapitel 5 Raum gegeben werden soll, seien nach den Ausführungen zum Londoner Blatt zunächst die Entstehungsumstände der Zeichnung untersucht, um verstehen zu können, wie Leonardo überhaupt zu diesem Thema und dieser Art der Darstellung kommt. Stellt die Kriegerbüsten-Zeichnung zwar ein Phänomen innerhalb Leonardos zeichnerischen Schaffens dar, so bewegt jedoch auch er sich auf dem Gebiet der Kriegerporträtdarstellung nicht
Recommended publications
  • Freeing Leonardo Da Vinci's Fight for the Standard in the Hall of the Five
    International Journal of Social Science Studies Vol. 5, No. 10; October 2017 ISSN 2324-8033 E-ISSN 2324-8041 Published by Redfame Publishing URL: http://ijsss.redfame.com Freeing Leonardo da Vinci’s Fight for the Standard in the Hall of the Five Hundred at Florence’s Palazzo Vecchio Antonio Cassella1 1President of Research Autism LLC (FL) and Director of Imerisya (Instituto merideño de investigación de la inteligencia social y del autismo, Mérida, Venezuela). Correspondence: Antonio Cassella, 1270 N. Wickham Rd. 16-613, Melbourne, FL, 32935, USA. Received: August 17, 2017 Accepted: September 1, 2017 Available online: September 18, 2017 doi:10.11114/ijsss.v5i10.2657 URL: https://doi.org/10.11114/ijsss.v5i10.2657 Abstract In June 2017, the author wrote an article in the International Journal of Social Science Studies in which he hypothesized that the Hall of the Five Hundred at Florence’s Palazzo Vecchio has been protecting the central piece of Leonardo da Vinci’s mural Battle of Anghiari: The Fight for the Standard (La Lotta per lo Stendardo) under Giorgio Vasari’s painting Battle of Marciano for 512 years now. On the evening of August 10, 2017, the author read a veiled message left by Vasari: The vertical line that passes through the center of the Battle of Marciano also passes through the center of the Fight for the Standard. On the evening of August 15, the author read a second secret message left by Vasari: The bottom of Leonardo’s Battle of Anghiari aligns with the floor of the Hall of the Five Hundred.
    [Show full text]
  • Leonardo Da Vinci and the Persistence of Myth Emily Hanson
    Washington University in St. Louis Washington University Open Scholarship All Theses and Dissertations (ETDs) 1-1-2012 Inventing the Sculptor: Leonardo da Vinci and the Persistence of Myth Emily Hanson Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/etd Recommended Citation Hanson, Emily, "Inventing the Sculptor: Leonardo da Vinci and the Persistence of Myth" (2012). All Theses and Dissertations (ETDs). 765. https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/etd/765 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses and Dissertations (ETDs) by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY Department of Art History & Archaeology INVENTING THE SCULPTOR LEONARDO DA VINCI AND THE PERSISTENCE OF MYTH by Emily Jean Hanson A thesis presented to the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Washington University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts May 2012 Saint Louis, Missouri ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wouldn’t be here without the help and encouragement of all the following people. Many thanks to all my friends: art historians, artists, and otherwise, near and far, who have sustained me over countless meals, phone calls, and cappuccini. My sincere gratitude extends to Dr. Wallace for his wise words of guidance, careful attention to my work, and impressive example. I would like to thank Campobello for being a wonderful mentor and friend, and for letting me persuade her to drive the nearly ten hours to Syracuse for my first conference, which convinced me that this is the best job in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rediscovered Watermark in the Drawing Leda and the Swan by Raphael Kept at Windsor Castle
    arts Article The Rediscovered Watermark in the Drawing Leda and the Swan by Raphael Kept at Windsor Castle Claudio Calì Design Department, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy; [email protected] Abstract: This article presents an in-depth study of Raphael’s drawing of Leda and the Swan (RCIN 912759), preserved at Windsor Castle. The research aims to make the paper’s physical properties accessible and extend the information on the watermark. The methodology follows an artistic– design-oriented approach. The data extraction process uses a back-lighting photographic technique combined with image post-processing operations. The work catalogues in scientific terms the complete paper mould lines of the Windsor sheet according to the International Standard of Paper Classification (IPH). Based on comparisons with a series of drawings by Leonardo da Vinci, the contribution suggests a chronological and provenance estimate of the paper used by Raphael. Keywords: Raphael; Leonardo da Vinci; Leda; design; paper-based watermark; digitisation; graphical representation; image-processing; art; preservation 1. Introduction The drawing Leda and the Swan in the Royal Collection at Windsor Castle, RCIN 912759, dated 1507, is one of Raphael’s best-known mythological studies and conceivably Citation: Calì, Claudio. 2021. The among the most remarkable portraits on paper dedicated to the figure of Leda. The Rediscovered Watermark in the examination of the drawing from life came about almost by chance. A research visit to Drawing Leda and the Swan by Windsor was made to analyse the paper supports of a series of drawings made by Leonardo Raphael Kept at Windsor Castle. Arts da Vinci.
    [Show full text]
  • Leonardo Da Vinci
    Leonardo da Vinci From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonardo_da_Vinci This is a Renaissance Florentine name. The name da Vinci is an indicator of birthplace, not a family name and the person is properly referred to by the given name Leonardo. Leonardo da Vinci Portrait by Francesco Melzi Born Lionardo di ser Piero da Vinci[1] 15 April 1452 Vinci, Republic of Florence(present-day Italy) Died 2 May 1519 (aged 67) Amboise, Kingdom of France Known for Art, science Works • Mona Lisa • The Last Supper • Salvator Mundi • The Vitruvian Man • Lady with an Ermine Movement High Renaissance Signature Leonardo di ser Piero da Vinci (Italian: [leoˈnardo di ˌsɛr ˈpjɛːro da (v)ˈvintʃi] ( listen); 15 April 1452 – 2 May 1519), more commonly Leonardo da Vinci or simply Leonardo, was an Italian polymath of the Renaissance whose areas of interest included invention, painting, sculpting, architecture, science, music, mathematics, engineering, literature, anatomy, geology, astronomy, botany, writing, history, and cartography. He has been variously called the father of palaeontology, ichnology, and architecture, and he is widely considered one of the greatest painters of all time. Sometimes credited with the inventions of the parachute, helicopter, and tank,[2][3][4] he epitomised the Renaissance humanist ideal. Many historians and scholars regard Leonardo as the prime exemplar of the "Universal Genius" or "Renaissance Man", an individual of "unquenchable curiosity" and "feverishly inventive imagination",[5] and he is widely
    [Show full text]
  • In the Art of Sandro Botticelli And
    CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE ANTIQUITY AND THE SISTINE SOJOURN (1481-1482) IN THE ART OF SANDRO BOTTICELLI AND DOMENICO GHIRLANDAIO Volume 1 A thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Art by Max Calvin Marmor May, 1982 ~ • I The Thesis of Max Calvin Marmor is approved: anne L. Trabold, Ph.D. California State University, Northridge i i This thesis is dedicated to the immortal words of Ibn Abad Sina "Seek not gold in shallow vessels!" (Contra Alchemia, Praefatio) iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thanks are due my thesis committee for allowing a maverick to go his own way. Without their contributions, this experience would not have been what it has been. More could be said on this score but, to quote the Devil (whose advice I should have followed from the outset): "Mach es kurz! Am Juengsten Tag ist's nur ein F--z!" So I'll "make it short." I owe special thanks to Dr. Birgitta Wohl, who initially persuaded me that higher education is worthwhile; who expressed unfailing interest in my ideas and progress; and who, throughout, has provided a unique living example of wide learning and humanistic scholarship. Finally, this thesis could not have been written without the ever prompt, ever courteous services of the CSUN Library Inter-Library Loan Department. Thanks to Charlotte (in her many roles}, to Misha and their myriad elves, who, for an unconscionably long time, made every day Christmas! iv CONTENTS Page LIST 01'' FIGURES . vii ABSTRACT . ix Chapter INTRODUCTION: CONTEXT AND CRISIS IN THE REVIVAL OF ANTIQUITY.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lost Manuscripts of Leonardo Da Vinci
    THE LOST MANUSCRIPTS OF LEONARDO DA VINCI A history of Leonardo da Vinci’s manuscripts and a calculation of how many remain lost by RICHARD SHAW POOLER Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF LITERATURE AND PHILOSOPHY in the subject of ART HISTORY at the UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA Promoter: Prof Bernadette Van Haute -------------------------------------- OCTOBER 2014 DECLARATION I declare that THE LOST MANUSCRIPTS OF LEONARDO DA VINCI is my own work and that all the sources that I have used or quoted have been indicated or acknowledged by means of complete references. ……………………………. Richard Shaw Pooler Date ………………………….. Title: THE LOST MANUSCRIPTS OF LEONARDO DA VINCI A history of Leonardo da Vinci’s manuscripts and a calculation of how many remain lost Summary: This thesis investigates the history of Leonardo da Vinci’s manuscripts, explains the recovery of some of those that were lost, and calculates what proportion of his work remains lost. It does this by researching the following four main topics: the compilation of his manuscripts; the dispersal and loss of his manuscripts; the recovery and reconstruction of some manuscripts; and an estimate of what remains lost. Most of Leonardo’s manuscripts were written in the last thirty years of his life. The first part of this thesis traces which manuscripts were written and when. After his death, his manuscripts dispersed and it is not known how many were lost. The next section details the dispersal. Recovery of some manuscripts took place followed by further dispersal and loss. Part of the recovery was due to key collectors such as Pompeo Leoni.
    [Show full text]
  • Caravaggio's Roman Patron Del Monte As a Florentine
    ABSTRACT Title of Document: IN THE GRACES OF HIS HIGHNESS THE GRAND DUKE: CARAVAGGIO’S ROMAN PATRON DEL MONTE AS A FLORENTINE COURTIER AND AGENT Marie J. Ladino Master of Arts 2009 Directed By: Dr. Anthony Colantuono Associate Professor Department of Art History and Archaeology While Cardinal Francesco Maria del Monte is celebrated as Caravaggio’s first major patron in Rome, his primary activities at the turn of the seventeenth century were, in reality, centered much more around his role as a courtier and an artistic agent working on behalf of Ferdinando I de’ Medici, the Grand Duke of Tuscany. In order to further the grand duke’s propagandistic agenda for himself and his state, the cardinal, from his position in Rome, advised Ferdinando on opportunities to buy and commission works of art. He also gave gifts to the sovereign, such as Caravaggio’s Medusa , always with the grand duke’s artistic aims in mind. Del Monte should indeed be thought of as a patron of the arts; however, his relationship with the Florentine court sheds light on an essential but perhaps understudied position within the mechanism of Italian patronage—that of the agent who works on behalf of another. IN THE GRACES OF HIS HIGHNESS THE GRAND DUKE: CARAVAGGIO’S ROMAN PATRON DEL MONTE AS A FLORENTINE COURTIER AND AGENT By Marie Jacquelin Ladino Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland, College Park, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts 2009 Advisory Committee: Professor Anthony Colantuono, Chair Professor Meredith Gill Professor Yui Suzuki © Copyright by Marie Jacquelin Ladino 2009 Disclaimer The thesis document that follows has had referenced material removed in respect for the owner's copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    ROBI-RTO LUDOVICO "DAL GR/\NITO ALL'ARCOBALENO" CINQUE SECOLI DI "T ITE" DI PAOLO UCCELLO, PITTORE FIORENTINO « Celui qui veut reconstituer un auteur à par- tir de son oeuvre se construit nécessaire- ment un personnage imaginaire » Paul \^aléry Non stupisce che figura di Paolo Uccello ricorra costantemente nelle "r//é'" degli ardsfi anteriori all'opera del Vasari, e che il Vasari stesso se ne occupi', o\'^'iamente — a metà del Cinquecento, e torni ancora in altre opere minori di storiografia arfisfica cinque e secentesche, prima ancora d'approdare alle tardo-secentesche iVo/Z^/V deiprofessori del disegno da Cimabue in qua del fiorendno Filippo Baldinucci-. Quel che invece potrebbe sor- prendere è la popolarità di cui Paolo Uccello gode in epoca moderna quan- do, a distanza di pochi anni, diventa oggetto di una delle I ».f ininiaginaires di Marcel Schwob e poi del primo dei Voemi italici del Pascoli che al pittore fiorentino dedicava l'omonima composizione apparsa originariamente sul «Marzocco» nel 1903 (5 luglio). Il grande interesse riscosso in campo let- terario al volgere del secolo scorso dal pittore del nostro rinascimento pare spiegarsi con alcuni tratti particolarmente affascinanti della sua personalità che agevolmente si prestano a rielaborarne l'immagine dal dominio stori- co a quello letterario. Interessante è seguire le vicende di questa lunga for- mna goduta nei secoli da Paolo Uccello, esaminando la storia e le evolu- zioni delle sue "vite" nella cultura artistica e letteraria di paesi diversi, cer- cando di stabilire quale sia la relazione di esse con le opere letterarie più recenti apparse in Italia e in Francia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Romance of Sandro Botticelli Woven with His Paintings
    THE ROMANCE OF SANDRO BOTTICELLI T« nIw yorc PUBUC UBRART «*^- —^.—.^ ,»„_,— ^1 t^y^n^y^n^€-.^^59i^^€i!/yi^/ta,. THE ROMANCE OF SANDRO BOTTICELLI WOVEN FROM HIS PAINTINGS BY A. J. ANDERSON Author o( "The Romance 6t Fra Filippo Lippi,'* etc. V- WITH PHOTOGRAVURE FRONTISPIECE AND NINETEEN OTHER ILLUSTRATIONS NEW YORK DODD, MEAD AND COMPANY 1912 !^\>S YV- PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN — PREFACE HE who would write the account of a Tuscan of the Quattrocento will find that there are two just courses open to him : he may compile a scientific record of bare facts and contemporary refer- ences, without a word of comment, or else he may tell his story in the guise of fiction. The common practice of writing a serious book, rooted on solid facts, and blossoming out into the author's personal deductions as to character and motives, is a monstrous injustice—the more authori- tative the style, the worse the crime—for who can judge the character and motives of even a contem- porary ? Besides, such works stand self-condemned, since the serious books and articles on Sandro Botti- celli, written during the past twenty years, prove beyond a doubt {a) That he was a deeply religious man, permeated with the rigorism of Savonarola, and groaning over the sins of Florence ; That he a (J?) was semi-pagan ; (r) That he was a philosopher, who despaired of reconciling Christianity with classicalism ; 5 6 Preface {d) That he was an ignorant person, who knew but little of those classical subjects which he took from the poems of Lorenzo and Politian ; ((?) That he was a deep student and essayist on Dante ; (/) That he was a careless fellow, with no thoughts beyond the jest and bottle.
    [Show full text]
  • OIL PAINTINGS on STONE and METAL in the SIXTEENTH and SEVENTEENTH CENTURIES a Dissertation Submitted T
    MATTER(S) OF IMMORTALITY: OIL PAINTINGS ON STONE AND METAL IN THE SIXTEENTH AND SEVENTEENTH CENTURIES A Dissertation Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By BRADLEY JAMES CAVALLO AUGUST 2017 Examining Committee Members: Tracy E. Cooper, Advisory Chair, Department of Art History Marcia B. Hall, Department of Art History Ashley D. West, Department of Art History Stuart Lingo, University of Washington © Copyright 2017 by Bradley James Cavallo All Rights Reserved ii ABSTRACT By the second decade of the twenty-first century, the preponderance of scholarship examining oil paintings made on stone slabs or metal sheets in Western Europe during the early modern period (fifteenth–eighteenth centuries) had settled on an interpretation of these artworks as artifacts of an elite taste that sought objects for inclusion in private collections of whatever was rare, curious, exquisite, or ingenious. In a cabinet of curiosities, naturalia formed by nature and artificialia made by man all complemented each other as demonstrations of marvelous things (mirabilia). Certainly small-scale paintings on stone or metal exhibited amidst these kinds of rarities aided in aggrandizing a noble or bourgeois collector’s social prestige. As well, they might have derived their interest as collectables because of the painter’s fame or increased capacity for miniaturization on copper plates, or because the painter left a slab of lapis lazuli, for example, partially uncovered to reveal its visually arresting stratigraphy or coloration. Nonetheless, while the lithic and metallic supports might have added value to the oil paintings it was not thought to add meaning.
    [Show full text]
  • ANDREA DEL CASTAGNO's LAST SUPPER by Eva Maria Lundin
    ANDREA DEL CASTAGNO’S LAST SUPPER by Eva Maria Lundin Under the Direction of Shelley Zuraw ABSTRACT This thesis analyzes Andrea del Castagno’s fresco of the Last Supper in the refectory of Sant’Apollonia, Florence. This study investigates the details of the commission, Castagno’s fresco in the iconographic tradition of representations of the Last Supper, the aspects which separate this Last Supper from previous examples in Florentine refectories, the fresco’s purpose in relation to its conventual setting, and also the artist’s use of both classicizing and contemporary elements and techniques. The central focus of my work is the significance of this fresco in terms of both the imagery Castagno employs and his possible sources. The purpose of this thesis is to recognize the innovative aspects of the fresco, as well as the role that Castagno played in the development of Florentine Renaissance art. INDEX WORDS: Andrea del Castagno, Castagno, Last Supper, Sant’Apollonia, Florentine refectories, Italian Renaissance painting, Fresco, Fictive marble ANDREA DEL CASTAGNO’S LAST SUPPER by Eva Maria Lundin B.A., University of Alabama, 2000 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF ART ATHENS, GEORGIA 2006 © 2006 Eva Maria Lundin All Rights Reserved. ANDREA DEL CASTAGNO’S LAST SUPPER by Eva Maria Lundin Major Professor: Shelley Zuraw Committee: Andrew Ladis Asen Kirin Electronic Version Approved: Maureen Grasso Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia December 2006 iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank the numerous people who have helped me throughout the past two and a half years, most importantly, the faculty, staff, and my fellow graduate students at the University of Georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Popular Library of Art Albrecht Durer 37
    The Popular Library of Art s A LBRECH T DU RER (3 7 Ill ustra tion ) . L N E C K E NSTE I N By I A . R E I I stra t n s O SS TT ( 5 3 ll u io ). By FO RD M ADO" H U E F FE R. RE M BRAN DT (6 1 Ill ustra tion s) . U G USTE BRE By A AL . FRE D W AL K E R ( 3 2 Ill us tra tion s a n d Ph t ra ure o og v ) . C E ME NT N L ACK By L I A B . M ILL E 2 I u stra t on s T (3 ll i ) . By ROMAIN ROLLAND . THE FRE NC H I M PRE SSI O N I STS 0 I u s ra t n s (5 ll t io ). A M E M A UC L AI R By C ILL . N R DA VI I s LEO A DO N C (44 Ill u tra tion s) . D r GE O RG GRON U By A . B u ra t s GA I N S OROU G H (5 5 Ill s t ion ) . RTH UR C H M B ER N . By A B . A LAI I L n s BO TT CE L I (3 7 Ill ust ra tio ) . M r AD V C RTW I G T By s (JULIA A R H ) . W A TTS . TE RT G. K . C H E S O By N .
    [Show full text]