An Explanatory Text to Accompany the 1:750,000 Scale Fault and Geologic Maps of California

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Explanatory Text to Accompany the 1:750,000 Scale Fault and Geologic Maps of California Physical! Sci .Lib. TN 24 C3 A3 NO. 201 PHYSICAL S«K AN EXPLANATORY TEXT SI TO ACCOMPANY THE 1:750,000 SCALE FAULT AND GEOLOGIC MAPS OF CALIFORNIA PURPOSE AND USE EVOLUTION OF FAULT AND GEOLOGIC MAPS FAULTS AND EARTHQUAKES MAJOR STRUCTURAL BLOCKS OF CALIFORNIA FAULT PATTERNS VOLCANOES THERMAL SPRINGS AND WELLS INDEXES TO: Faults Hot Springs Formations Source Data 1 s^l -J BULLETIN 201 AN EXPLANATORY TEXT TO ACCOMPANY THE 1:750,000 SCALE FAULT AND GEOLOGIC MAPS OF CALIFORNIA By Charles W. Jennings Geologist 1985 L^ CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION ^^'"'M^ DIVISION OF MINES AND GEOLOGY 1416 NINTH STREET, ROOM 1341 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 CONTENTS Page Preface vii Abstract ix Introduction 1 Purpose and uses 1 Value of map compilations 2 Base Mop 2 Source data 2 Acknowledgments 3 Part I Fault Map of California Introduction 7 Recognition of faulting as cause of eartliquakes 7 Evolution of fault maps of California 7 First fault map of the state— 1908 7 Second fault map of California— 1922 - 9 Faults sfiown on Geologic Map of California— 1938 10 Combined Wood and Jenkins fault map of tfie southern half of the state— 1947 11 Earthquake Epicenter and Fault Map of California— 1964 12 Earthquake Epicenter Mop of California— 1978 12 Small-scale fault maps of California 12 Preliminary Fault and Geologic Map of California— 1973 14 Fault Map of California— 1975 edition 14 Depiction of faults 15 Fault classification 15 Fault definitions 15 Historic faults, earthquakes, and creep 16 Earthquakes with surface rupture 16 Recorded fault creep 18 Displaced survey lines 23 Seismicity 23 Quaternary faults 24 Identification 24 Problems 24 Plio-Pleistocene boundary controversy 26 Major Quaternary faults 26 Philosophy of conservatism 26 Pre-Quoternory faults 27 Accuracy of fault locations 27 Offshore structure 28 Coast Range thrust 28 Circular fault structures 28 Future changes in fault depiction 29 Fault patterns 30 Structural provinces 30 Predominant fault trends defining structural provinces 31 Major structural blocks with predominantly northwest faults 31 Coast Ranges block 31 Peninsular Ranges block 31 Major structural block having predominantly east-trending faults 31 Transverse Ranges block 31 Santa Ynez and Son Gabriel sub-blocks 31 Banning sub-block 31 San Bernardino sub-block 31 Pinto Mountains sub-block 31 Major structural blocks charocterized by northeast-trending fault boundaries 32 Mojove block 32 Tehachapi block 32 iii Page Major structural blockj charocterized by north-trending faults 32 Kern Canyon block 32 Ponomint and Death Valley blocks 32 Worner block 33 East Sierra block 33 Cascade block 33 Gordo block 33 Major structural blocks characterized by other types of faults 33 Sonoran Desert block 33 Sierra Nevada block 33 Klamath block 33 Modoc block 33 Coast Ranges sub-blocks 33 Santo Lucia and Gobilan sub-blocks 33 Son Francisco ond Berkeley sub-blocks 34 Diablo and Great Valley sub-blocks 34 Stonyford sub-block 34 Peninsular Ranges sub-blocks 34 San Clemente and Cotalina sub-blocks 34 Polos Verdes and Inglewood-Son Diego sub-blocks 34 Santa Ana, Riverside, and Son Jacinto sub-blocks 34 Sub-blocks within the Modoc block 34 Summary 34 Fault couples 35 En echelon faults 35 Regularity of fault spacing 35 Summary on fault geometry 39 Faulting and patterns of seismicity 39 Relationship of epicenters to faults 39 Relationship of surface rupture to earthquake magnitude 41 Faults with recurring earthquake activity 41 Patterns of seismicity 42 Cautions in use of Fault Map of California for land-use planning 42 Depiction of volcanoes 43 Distribution and age 43 Relation of volcanoes to faults 44 Volcanic hazards 44 Depiction of thermal springs and wells 45 Temperoture 45 Mode of occurrence of hot springs 45 Distribution of hot springs 45 Part II Geologic Map of California Introduction 51 History of geologic mops of California 51 The first attempts 51 Preliminary Minerological and Geological Map of the State of California— 1891 51 Geological Mop of the State of Colifornia— 1916 51 Geological Mop of California— 1938 52 Geologic Atlos of California— 1958-1969 52 Two smoll-scole geologic maps of California (1966 and 1968) 54 Geologic Map of California— 1977 54 History of the project 54 Uses of the geologic map 55 Objectives and contents 56 Representation of faults 56 Representation of contacts 56 Compilation method 56 Classification of rock units and special problems 58 Colors, patterns, symbols of rock units, ond mop appearance 61 Geologic time scale 66 Volcanoes 66 Botholiths ond plutons 66 Offshore geology 68 References cited in Parts I ond II 69 iv Part III Appendices Page APPENDIX A: INDEX TO FAULT NAMES SHOWN ON THE FAULT MAP OF CALIFORNIA, 1975 EDITION Named faults shown 77 Procedure for naming faults 77 Index to fault names 78 Supplemental index to fault names 80 APPENDIX B: TABULATED LIST OF THERMAL SPRINGS AND WELLS Data used and acknowledgments 81 Locating thermal springs and wells 81 Tabulated list of thermal springs and wells 81 References cited in Appendix B 1 17 APPENDIX C: INDEX TO THE GEOLOGIC FORMATIONS GROUPED WITHIN EACH UNIT PORTRAYED ON THE GEOLOGIC MAP OF CALIFORNIA, 1977 EDITION Explanation 1 19 Index 120 APPENDIX D: SOURCE DATA INDEX How to use this index 125 Other references 125 Indexes to published geologic maps 125 Indexes to theses 125 Explanation of maps 127 Bibliography (by atlas sheet) 128 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figures Figure 1. Increase of published geologic map data for California 2 Figure 2. Theses on California geology 1892-1976 (exclusive of topical and brood regional studies) 3 Figure 3. Bruce Clark's 1930 map of California showing "principal known primary faults" 13 Figure 4. Mop of California and adjacent terrone showing major Quaternary faults and identifying historic fault breaks, occurrences of fault creep, and triggered creep 19 Figure 5. Mop showing small-magnitude earthquake epicenters reported during 1975 25 Figure 6. Generalized mop of the Long Volley-Mono Craters area showing location of faults 29 Figure 7. Numerous short NW and NE conjugate faults characteristic of the Panomint and Death Valley blocks 32 Figure 8. Diagonal faults formed between two major strike-slip faults, the Son Andreas and the Rodgers Creek-Heoldsburg faults ... 36 Figure 9. Diagonal faults formed between the strike-slip Son Andreas and Son Gabriel faults 37 Figure 10. Diagonal folds formed between the San Andreas and Rinconada faults in thin sedimentary cover overlying granitic basement rocks 38 Figure 11. Fracture zones illustrated by Menard (1955) 40 Figure 12. Part of a tectonic mop of the world (Condie, 1976) including the same area illustrated by Menard 40 Figure 13. Alignment of Tertiary volcanic plugs near San Luis Obispo along a line of weakness presumed to be on ancient fault 44 Figure 14. Relief Mop of California showing geomorphic provinces 48 Figure 15. Geologic Legend (generalized description of rock types) 62-63 Figure 16. State index map showing the boundaries of the individual Geologic Atlas sheets and the source data index mops in Appendix D 126 Page Tables Table 1. Summory of published foull mops of Colifornia 14 Table 2. Comporison of various commonly used fault definitions 17 Table 3. Evidence used for determining fault history 17 Table 4. Port A. Historic surface faulting associated v/ith earthquakes in California 20 Port B. Historic surface faulting associated with earthquakes in Nevado ond Bajo California 22 Port C. California faults displaying fault-creep slippage not associated with earthquakes 22 Part D. Triggered creep along faults associated with earthquakes in California 23 Table 5. California seismic record for 75 years 41 Table 6. Observed volcanic events in California 44 Table 7. Springs neor boiling point temperature 46 Table 8. State geologic mops of California 52 Table 9. Geologic otlos of California (1 -.250,000 scale) 53 Table 10. Derived legend for 1:750,000 scale Geologic Mop of California 59-60 Table 11. Comparison of "American" and "International" mop colors for sedimentary rocks 64 Table 12. Comparison of "American" and "International" map colors for plutonic and volcanic rocks 64 Table 13. Patterns used on Geologic Mop of Colifornio 65 Table 14. Geologic time scale 67 Table 15. Botholifh, plutons, and stocks identified on the 1977 Geologic Mop of California 68 Plates (in pocket) Plate lA. Faults shown on the first fault mop of California. From Mop No. 1 of the State Earthquake Investigation Commission report on the California earthquake of April 18,1906 (Lowson and others, 1908) . Fault names shown in quotation marks ore from the text of 1908 report; other fault names were added from current usage. Plate 1 B. H. O. Wood's abridged version of Lawson's 1908 fault map of California, showing faults and "lines" tentative!/ considered by Wood to be generatrices of earthquakes. Plate IC. Faults shown on the Fault Map of California compiled by B. Willis ond H. O. Wood and published by the Seismologlcal Society of America in 1922 at o scale of 1:506,880. Plate ID. Faults shown on the Geologic Mop of California published in 1938 at 1:500,000 scole. This reduced version, showing faults only, includes all those faults shown on the larger scale mop. Faults were not shown by name on the original mop, but have been identified on this plate. Plate IE. Foult mop of southern California (here slightly generalized) compiled by H. O. Wood. Faults were taken largely from the 1922 Fault Mop of Californio and the 1938 Geologic Mop of California. Plate 2A. Structural provinces of California determined by the prominent fault patterns and characteristics of the faults they contain or bound. Plate 2B. Parallelism between major Quaternary faults and regularity of fault spacing. Plate 2C.
Recommended publications
  • PDF Linkchapter
    Index (Italic page numbers indicate major references) Abalone Cove landslide, California, Badger Spring, Nevada, 92, 94 Black Dyke Formation, Nevada, 69, 179, 180, 181, 183 Badwater turtleback, California, 128, 70, 71 abatement districts, California, 180 132 Black Mountain Basalt, California, Abrigo Limestone, Arizona, 34 Bailey ash, California, 221, 223 135 Acropora, 7 Baked Mountain, Alaska, 430 Black Mountains, California, 121, Adams Argillite, Alaska, 459, 462 Baker’s Beach, California, 267, 268 122, 127, 128, 129 Adobe Range, Nevada, 91 Bald Peter, Oregon, 311 Black Point, California, 165 Adobe Valley, California, 163 Balloon thrust fault, Nevada, 71, 72 Black Prince Limestone, Arizona, 33 Airport Lake, California, 143 Banning fault, California, 191 Black Rapids Glacier, Alaska, 451, Alabama Hills, California, 152, 154 Barrett Canyon, California, 202 454, 455 Alaska Range, Alaska, 442, 444, 445, Barrier, The, British Columbia, 403, Blackhawk Canyon, California, 109, 449, 451 405 111 Aldwell Formation, Washington, 380 Basin and Range Province, 29, 43, Blackhawk landslide, California, 109 algae 48, 51, 53, 73, 75, 77, 83, 121, Blackrock Point, Oregon, 295 Oahu, 6, 7, 8, 10 163 block slide, California, 201 Owens Lake, California, 150 Basin Range fault, California, 236 Blue Lake, Oregon, 329 Searles Valley, California, 142 Beacon Rock, Oregon, 324 Blue Mountains, Oregon, 318 Tatonduk River, Alaska, 459 Bear Meadow, Washington, 336 Blue Mountain unit, Washington, 380 Algodones dunes, California, 101 Bear Mountain fault zone, California,
    [Show full text]
  • October 3, 2018
    Cuyama Valley Groundwater Basin Groundwater Sustainability Plan Hydrogeologic Conceptual Model Draft Prepared by: October 2018 Table of Contents Chapter 2 Basin Setting .......................................................................................................2-2 Acronyms 2-3 2.1 Hydrogeologic Conceptual Model ..........................................................................2-4 2.1.1 Useful Terminology ................................................................................................2-4 2.1.2 Regional Geologic and Structural Setting ..............................................................2-5 2.1.3 Geologic History ....................................................................................................2-5 2.1.4 Geologic Formations/Stratigraphy .........................................................................2-8 2.1.5 Faults and Structural Features ............................................................................. 2-17 2.1.6 Basin Boundaries ................................................................................................ 2-26 2.1.7 Principal Aquifers and Aquitards .......................................................................... 2-26 2.1.8 Natural Water Quality Characterization ................................................................ 2-32 2.1.9 Topography, Surface Water and Recharge .......................................................... 2-36 2.1.10 Hydrogeologic Conceptual Model Data Gaps .....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Annex to Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan – July 2017
    City of Santa Barbara Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Annex to Santa Barbara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan – July 2017 City of Santa Barbara Annex to Santa Barbara County 2017 Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Contents SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 3 SECTION 2 PLAN PURPOSE AND AUTHORITY ................................................................... 4 SECTION 3 PLANNING PROCESS ............................................................................................. 6 Overview ................................................................................................................................. 8 Mitigation Advisory Committee (MAC) ................................................................................. 9 MAC Members ........................................................................................................................ 9 Overview of MAC Meetings ................................................................................................. 10 City Local Hazard Mitigation Planning Team ...................................................................... 11 SECTION 4 CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT ................................................................................ 14 Governance ........................................................................................................................... 14 Departmental Responsibilities, Plans, and Capabilities ........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • And Induced Seismicity
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR " GEOLOGICAL SURVEY SUMMARIES OF TECHNICAL REPORTS, VOLUME XIII Prepared by Participants in NATIONAL EARTHQUAKE HAZARDS REDUCTION PROGRAM Compiled by Barbara B. Charonnat External Research Program Thelma R. Rodriguez Earthquake Prediction Wanda H. Seiders Earthquake Hazards and Risk Assessment Global Seismology and Induced Seismicity The research results described in the following summaries were submitted by the investigators on November 30, 1981 and cover the 6-month period from April 1, 1981 through October 31, 1981. These reports include both work performed under contracts administered by the Geological Survey and work by members of the Geological Survey. The report summaries are grouped into the four major elements of the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program: Earthquake Hazards and Risk Assessment (H) Robert D. Brown, Jr., Coordinator U.S. Geological Survey 345 Middlefield Road, MS-77 Menlo Park, California 94025 Earthquake Prediction (P) James H. Dieterich, Coordinator U.S. Geological Survey 345 Middlefield Road, MS-77 Menlo Park, California 94025 Global Seismology (G) Eric R. Engdahl, Coordinator U.S. Geological Survey Denver Federal Center, MS-967 Denver, Colorado 80225 Induced Seismicity (IS) Mark D. Zoback, Coordinator U.S. Geological Survey 345 Middlefield Road, MS-77 Menlo Park, California 94025 Open File Report No. 82-6£ This report has not been reviewed for conformity with USGS editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. Parts of it were prepared under contract to the U.S. Geological Survey and the opinions and conclusions expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of the USGS. Any use of trade names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the USGS.
    [Show full text]
  • Explanatory Text to Accompany the Fault Activity Map of California
    An Explanatory Text to Accompany the Fault Activity Map of California Scale 1:750,000 ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor LESTER A. SNOW, Secretary BRIDGETT LUTHER, Director JOHN G. PARRISH, Ph.D., State Geologist STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION CALIFORNIA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CALIFORNIA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY JOHN G. PARRISH, Ph.D. STATE GEOLOGIST Copyright © 2010 by the California Department of Conservation, California Geological Survey. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without written consent of the California Geological Survey. The Department of Conservation makes no warranties as to the suitability of this product for any given purpose. An Explanatory Text to Accompany the Fault Activity Map of California Scale 1:750,000 Compilation and Interpretation by CHARLES W. JENNINGS and WILLIAM A. BRYANT Digital Preparation by Milind Patel, Ellen Sander, Jim Thompson, Barbra Wanish, and Milton Fonseca 2010 Suggested citation: Jennings, C.W., and Bryant, W.A., 2010, Fault activity map of California: California Geological Survey Geologic Data Map No. 6, map scale 1:750,000. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor LESTER A. SNOW, Secretary BRIDGETT LUTHER, Director JOHN G. PARRISH, Ph.D., State Geologist STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION CALIFORNIA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY An Explanatory Text to Accompany the Fault Activity Map of California INTRODUCTION data for states adjacent to California (http://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/qfaults/). The The 2010 edition of the FAULT ACTIVTY MAP aligned seismicity and locations of Quaternary OF CALIFORNIA was prepared in recognition of the th volcanoes are not shown on the 2010 Fault Activity 150 Anniversary of the California Geological Map.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Geological Survey Final Technical Report Award No
    U.S. Geological Survey Final Technical Report Award No. G12AP20066 Recipient: University of California at Santa Barbara Mapping the 3D Geometry of Active Faults in Southern California Craig Nicholson1, Andreas Plesch2, John Shaw2 & Egill Hauksson3 1Marine Science Institute, UC Santa Barbara 2Department of Earth & Planetary Sciences, Harvard University 3Seismological Laboratory, California Institute of Technology Principal Investigator: Craig Nicholson Marine Science Institute, University of California MC 6150, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-6150 phone: 805-893-8384; fax: 805-893-8062; email: [email protected] 01 April 2012 - 31 March 2013 Research supported by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Department of the Interior, under USGS Award No. G12AP20066. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors, and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the U.S. Government. 1 Mapping the 3D Geometry of Active Faults in Southern California Abstract Accurate assessment of the seismic hazard in southern California requires an accurate and complete description of the active faults in three dimensions. Dynamic rupture behavior, realistic rupture scenarios, fault segmentation, and the accurate prediction of fault interactions and strong ground motion all strongly depend on the location, sense of slip, and 3D geometry of these active fault surfaces. Comprehensive and improved catalogs of relocated earthquakes for southern California are now available for detailed analysis. These catalogs comprise over 500,000 revised earthquake hypocenters, and nearly 200,000 well-determined earthquake focal mechanisms since 1981. These extensive catalogs need to be carefully examined and analyzed, not only for the accuracy and resolution of the earthquake hypocenters, but also for kinematic consistency of the spatial pattern of fault slip and the orientation of 3D fault surfaces at seismogenic depths.
    [Show full text]
  • Quaternary Fault and Fold Database of the United States
    Jump to Navigation Quaternary Fault and Fold Database of the United States As of January 12, 2017, the USGS maintains a limited number of metadata fields that characterize the Quaternary faults and folds of the United States. For the most up-to-date information, please refer to the interactive fault map. Santa Ynez fault zone, Pacifico section (Class A) No. 87a Last Review Date: 2000-08-01 citation for this record: Treiman, J.A., compiler, 2000, Fault number 87a, Santa Ynez fault zone, Pacifico section, in Quaternary fault and fold database of the United States: U.S. Geological Survey website, https://earthquakes.usgs.gov/hazards/qfaults, accessed 12/14/2020 03:14 PM. Synopsis General: Other than the basic geologic map location from Dibblee (1950 #5977; 1966 #5978) and a few other local studies, very little is known about most of this fault zone. Paleoseismic studies have been done in only two localities--the Alegria Canyon site along the Santa Ynez, South Branch section [87c] and the Rancho San Marcos site near the assigned section boundary between the Santa Ynez, Western section [87b] and Santa Ynez, Eastern sections [87d]. Although the latter study site, demonstrating Holocene displacement, is tentatively placed in the Santa Ynez, Eastern section [87d], the majority of this section (especially in Ventura County) is very poorly studied with respect to recency of activity. The South Branch is a little better known as a result of investigations in the late 1970's and early 1980's for a proposed Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) facility (Envicom, 1978 #5981; Yerkes and others, 1980 #5993; Rice and others, 1981 #5986) as well as an earlier study cited by Hart (1978 #5983).
    [Show full text]
  • RESEARCH Structural Modeling of the Western Transverse Ranges
    RESEARCH Structural modeling of the Western Transverse Ranges: An imbricated thrust ramp architecture Y. Levy 1,2 , T.K. Rockwell 1, J.H. Shaw 3, A. Plesch 3, N.W. Driscoll 2, and H. Perea 2,4 1DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGICAL SCIENCES, SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY, 5500 CAMPANILE DRIVE, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92182, USA 2SCRIPPS INSTITUTION OF OCEANOGRAPHY, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA–SAN DIEGO, 9500 GILMAN DRIVE, LA JOLLA, CALIFORNIA 92037, USA 3DEPARTMENT OF EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCES, HARVARD UNIVERSITY, 20 OXFORD STREET, CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS 02138, USA 4INSTITUT DE CIENCIES DEL MAR, CONSEJO SUPERIOR DE INVESTIGACIONES CIENTIFICAS, PASSEIG MARITIM DE LA BARCELONETA, 37-49, 08003 B ARCELONA, SPAIN ABSTRACT Active fold-and-thrust belts can potentially accommodate large-magnitude earthquakes, so understanding the structure in such regions has both societal and scientic importance. Recent studies have provided evidence for large earthquakes in the Western Transverse Ranges of California, USA. However, the diverse set of conicting structural models for this region highlights the lack of understanding of the subsurface geometry of faults. A more robust structural model is required to assess the seismic hazard of the Western Transverse Ranges. Toward this goal, we developed a forward structural model using Trishear in MOVE ® to match the rst-order structure of the Western Transverse Ranges, as inferred from surface geology, subsurface well control, and seismic stratigraphy. We incorporated the full range of geologic observations, including vertical motions from uplifted uvial and marine terraces, as constraints on our kinematic forward modeling. Using fault-related folding methods, we predicted the geometry and sense of slip of the major faults at depth, and we used these structures to model the evolution of the Western Transverse Ranges since the late Pliocene.
    [Show full text]
  • San Andreas Fault and Coastal Geology from Half Moon Bay to Fort Funston: Crustal Motion, Climate Change, and Human Activity David W
    Field SanTrip Andreas4 Fault and Coastal Geology from Half Moon Bay to Fort Funston: Crustal Motion, Climate Change, and Human Activity San Andreas Fault and Coastal Geology from Half Moon Bay to Fort Funston: Crustal Motion, Climate Change, and Human Activity David W. Andersen Department of Geology, San José State University, Calif. Andrei M. Sarna-Wojcicki U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, Calif. Richard L. Sedlock Department of Geology, San José State University, Calif. Introduction The geology of the San Francisco Peninsula reflects many processes operating at time scales ranging from hundreds of millions of years to a fraction of a human lifetime. We can attribute today’s landscape in the San Francisco Bay area to three major processes, each operating at its own pace, but each interacting with the others and with subsidiary processes: (1) the slow, long-term motion of the North American tectonic plate as it moves relative to the northwest-moving Pacific Plate, and the smaller but important component of crustal compression between the two plates; (2) the more rapid changes in global climate during the last few million years, which have controlled the rise and fall of sea level and the succession of flora and fauna on land and along the coast; and (3) the very recent, explosive growth of human population and its related activity, as expressed in pervasive ecological impact and urbanization. The oldest rocks in the region formed nearly 170 Ma (million years ago) under conditions very different from those in the San Francisco Bay area today, and rocks that were formed far apart have been juxtaposed during their later history.
    [Show full text]
  • Prepared by Participants in October 1987 This Report Is Preliminary And
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY NATIONAL EARTHQUAKE HAZARDS REDUCTION PROGRAM, SUMMARIES OF TECHNICAL REPORTS VOLUME XXV Prepared by Participants in NATIONAL EARTHQUAKE HAZARDS REDUCTION PROGRAM October 1987 OPEN-FILE REPORT 88-16 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S.Geological Survey editorial standards Any use of trade name is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the USGS. Menlo Park, California 1988 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY NATIONAL EARTHQUAKE HAZARDS REDUCTION PROGRAM, SUMMARIES OF TECHNICAL REPORTS VOLUME XXV Prepared by Participants in NATIONAL EARTHQUAKE HAZARDS REDUCTION PROGRAM Compiled by Muriel L. Jacobson Thelma R. Rodriguez The research results described in the following summaries were submitted by the investigators on October 1, 1987 and cover the period from May 1, 1987 through October 1, 1987. These reports include both work performed under contracts administered by the Geological Survey and work by members of the Geological Survey. The report summaries are grouped into the five major elements of the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program. Open File Report No. 88-16 This report has not been reviewed for conformity with USGS editorial stan­ dards and stratigraphic nomenclature. Parts of it were prepared under contract to the U.S. Geological Survey and the opinions and conclusions expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of the USGS. Any use of trade names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorse­ ment by the USGS. The data and interpretations in these progress reports may be reevaluated by the investigators upon completion of the research.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphic and Diagenetic Comparisons of the Monterey Formation, Point Reyes and Monterey Areas, California
    STRATIGRAPHIC AND DIAGENETIC COMPARISONS OF THE MONTEREY FORMATION, POINT REYES AND MONTEREY AREAS, CALIFORNIA A Thesis submitted to the faculty of San Francisco State University In partial fulfillment of The requirements for The Degree AS m Master of Science C,E0L In . ^ 5 Geosciences by Burcin Kelez San Francisco, California May 2016 Copyright by Burcin Kelez 2016 CERTIFICATION OF APPROVAL I certify that I have read Stratigraphic and diagenetic comparisons o f the Monterey Formation, Point Reyes and Monterey Areas, California by Burcin Kelez, and that in my opinion this work meets the criteria for approving a thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree: Master of Science in Geosciences at San Francisco State University. u X aaA i ; Lisa White, Ph.D. Adjunct Professor Thomas MacKinnon, Ph.D. Geologist, retired Chevron STRATIGRAPHIC AND DIAGENETIC COMPARISONS OF THE MONTEREY FORMATION, POINT REYES AND MONTEREY AREAS, CALIFORNIA Burcin Kelez San Francisco, California 2016 The Miocene Monterey Formation is a deep marine deposit characterized by a high content of biogenic silica and organic matter. The biogenic silica is derived mainly from diatoms. Rock types include diatomaceous rocks and their diagenetic equivalents- chert, porcelanite and siliceous mudstone. The Monterey Formation is the source and reservoir rock for most of the oil and gas resources in California. Although the Monterey Formation in many other places in California is composed of three distinctive members, calcareous, phosphatic, and siliceous, the younger siliceous part is the most extensive facies and is the only member well exposed at Point Reyes and the Monterey area. I have examined the stratigraphic and diagenetic features of the sub-members of the siliceous part of the Monterey Formation at two locations: Pt Reyes and the Monterey area.
    [Show full text]
  • Explanitory Text to Accompany the Fault Activity Map of California
    An Explanatory Text to Accompany the Fault Activity Map of California Scale 1:750,000 ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor LESTER A. SNOW, Secretary BRIDGETT LUTHER, Director JOHN G. PARRISH, Ph.D., State Geologist STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION CALIFORNIA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CALIFORNIA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY JOHN G. PARRISH, Ph.D. STATE GEOLOGIST Copyright © 2010 by the California Department of Conservation, California Geological Survey. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without written consent of the California Geological Survey. The Department of Conservation makes no warranties as to the suitability of this product for any given purpose. An Explanatory Text to Accompany the Fault Activity Map of California Scale 1:750,000 Compilation and Interpretation by CHARLES W. JENNINGS and WILLIAM A. BRYANT Digital Preparation by Milind Patel, Ellen Sander, Jim Thompson, Barbra Wanish, and Milton Fonseca 2010 Suggested citation: Jennings, C.W., and Bryant, W.A., 2010, Fault activity map of California: California Geological Survey Geologic Data Map No. 6, map scale 1:750,000. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor LESTER A. SNOW, Secretary BRIDGETT LUTHER, Director JOHN G. PARRISH, Ph.D., State Geologist STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION CALIFORNIA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY An Explanatory Text to Accompany the Fault Activity Map of California INTRODUCTION data for states adjacent to California (http://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/qfaults/). The The 2010 edition of the FAULT ACTIVTY MAP aligned seismicity and locations of Quaternary OF CALIFORNIA was prepared in recognition of the th volcanoes are not shown on the 2010 Fault Activity 150 Anniversary of the California Geological Map.
    [Show full text]