Host Plant Association of Western Species of Papaipema

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Host Plant Association of Western Species of Papaipema VOLUME 57, NUMBER 2 153 FIGS. 1-4. Dichrorarnpha acuminatana. 1, Wings of male from Steuben, ME. 2, \\lings of male from Apetlon, Austria. 3, Genitalia of male from Steuben, ME. 4, Genitalia of male frum Apetlon, Austria. Further details are in the Specimens examined section of the text. The species is widely distributed in western and genit. slide prep. WEM612012 (Fig. 4), foreWing central Europe (Razowski 1996). Two Palaearctic con­ length 5.5 mm. The four Palaearctic specimens are in geners, D. vancouverana McDunnough (=D. gue­ the U.S. National Museum of Natural History neeana Obraztsov) and D. petiverella (L.), were previ­ (USNM), Washington, D.C.; we thank J. W. Brown for ously reported in Maine (Roberts 1991), and loaning them. subsequent collecting there has revealed well estab­ lished populations of these species along the immedi­ LITERATURE CITED ate coastline wherever undisturbed stands of their na­ BENTINCK, G. A. & A. DIAKONOFF. 1968. De Nederlandse hladrollers (Tortricidae). Monogr. Nederlands. Entomo!' Ver. tive or naturalized foodplant Achillea millefolium L. No.3. 201 pp. (Asteraceae) occur. With captures of D. vancouverana KUZNETSOV, V 1. 1987. Family Tortricidae (tortricid moths), pp. in the Pacific Northwest (Miller 1999), coastal distri­ 279-956. In Medvedev, G. S. (ed.), Keys to the insects of the European part of the USSR. U.S Dept. of Agr. & Nat!. Science bution patterns of the two hoi arctic congeners con­ Found. 991 pp. [translationl tinue to suggest they are immigrants, although the MILLER, W. E. 1999. A new synonymy in Dichrorampha that re­ possibility cannot be ruled out that they represent veals an overlooked immigrant record for North America (Tor­ trieidae). J. Lepid. Soc. 53:74-75. spotty relicts of circumpolar distributions. RAZOWSKI, J. 1996. Tortricidae, pp. 130-157. In Karsholt, O. & J. Specimens examined. 0, Steuben, ME (Fig. 1), Razowski (eds.), The Lepidoptera of Europe: a distributional M. A. Roberts, 15/06/2001, genit. slide prep. checklist. Apollo Books, Stenstrup. 380 pp. ROBERTS, M. A. 1991. Two Pale arctic species of Dichrommpha dis­ MAR2027M (Fig. 3), forewing length 7.0 mm, in M. covered in Maine (Tortriddae). J. Lepid. Soc. 45:169- 171. A. Roberts collection, Steuben, ME; 0, Wangeroog, Ostfries. Inseln [ Germany], 07/09/1949, E. Jackh, MICHAEL A. ROBERTS, 367 Village Road, Steuben, genit. prep. on pin, forewing length 6.0 mm; 0, Kel­ Maine 04680, USA. Email: [email protected] AND heim, Obfrk. [ Germany], 03/08/1952, Jackh, genit. WILLIAM E. MILLER, Department of Entomology, Uni­ prep. on pin, foreWing length 6.0 mm; 0, Hannover, versity of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota 55108, USA. Misb Moor [Germany], 29/05/1931, genit. slide prep. Email: [email protected] WEM 612011, forewing length 6.5 mm; 0, Apetlon, Received for publicatiun 8 April 2002; revised and accepted 11 No­ Burgenland [Austria] (Fig. 2), 11/09/1971, E. Jackh, vember 2002. journal oftlte Lepidopterists' SOCiety 57(2). 2003, 153-156 HOST PLANT ASSOCIATIONS OF WESTERN SPECIES OF PAPAIPEMA (NOCTUIDAE) WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO THE APIACEOUS PLANTS Additional key words: host plants, Apiaceae, Asteraceae, polyphagy. The genus Papaipema Smith (Noctuidae) is the seded only by the Holarctic genera Acronicta Ochs. (n largest noctuid genus endemic to North America has = 81 Nearctic species), Catocala Schrank (n = 110), long been a favorite among students of lepidopteran Lacinipolia McDunnough (n = 57), and Schinia Hub­ life histmy (e.g., Kwiat 1916, Hessel 1954). With 46 ner (n = 123 species in North America) (Hodges described species and at least 5 undescribed species of 1983). Papaipema currently includes 46 valid de­ which we are, Papaipema is the fifth most speciose scribed species, at least five undescribed species noctuid genus on this continent (Hodges 1983), super- (Quinter, in MS), and two valid subspecific entities, 154 J OURNAL OF THE LEPIDOPTERISTS' SOCIETY Papaipema baptisiae baptisiae (Bird) and Papaipema notes of his son (archived at the American Museum of b. limata Bird (KL. Quinter, in Hodges 1983). Natural History), the late Junius Bird, the host plant Papaipema and its relatives form a putatively mono­ was described as a "large, Dill-like weed," suggesting an phyletic clade of endophagous plant borers in the apiaceous plant. The published association of P per­ Apameini (sensu Hodges 1983). Whereas most of the tincta with Lupinus polyphyllus Lindley (Fabaceae) species in this tribe are associated with monocotyledo­ (see Bird 1926) is curious because only two other Pa­ nous plants, species of Papaipema feed and specialize paipema species are associated with fabaceous plants: on members of between 22 and 25 plant families the western Papaipema angelica with Psoralea (Goldstein 1999). Though well studied, a number of macrostachya DC., and the eastern Papaipema bap­ questions remain eoncerning host plant associations in tisiae with Baptisia tinctoria (L.). this group, especially among the relatively few western Outside the Papaipema birdi complex, umbellifer­ species (Papaipema attains its highest regional diver­ feeding occurs in Papaipema eryngii, a threatened sity in the eastern United States). In this paper, we species restricted to prairie wetlands where it speCial­ present life history data based on recent collecting and izes on Eryngium yuccifolium, and in the P harrisi rearing efforts for species belonging to the Papaipema group, comprising P harrisi and P verona Smith). birdi (Dyar 1908) and Papaipema harrisi Grote Host records for P harrisi, whose distribution suggest species complexes, and summarize the known host as­ an association with Heracleum lanatum Michx. (Api­ sociations for the remaining western Papaipema aceae) along the Atlantic Coast and an association with species and those associated with Apiaceae regardless Angelica atropurpurea L. (Apiaceae) westward follow­ of geography. Our observations bear on the evolution ing the Great Lakes (Kwiat 1916, Hessel 1954, Jones of umbellifer-feeding in Lepidoptera, and Papaipema & Kimball 1943, Quinter unpublished data), Both of in particular and possibly the role of coumarin com­ these host species are apiaceous plants, In the North­ pounds in mediating the evolution of host association east, it is thought that P birdi and P harrisi segregate (e .g. , Berenbaum 1981, 1983). We also discuss collect­ themselves according to host plant, with P birdi con­ ing and rearing efforts on eastern umbel-feeding Pa­ fining itself to Cicuta maculata and P harrisi to Angel­ paipema species. All larvae encountered were reared ica atropurpurea (see Kwiat 1916, Hessel 1954), Pa­ on artificial diet, and adult specimens deposited at paipema verona, for which we do not report novel host AM"IH and FMNH. records, is a western species recorded primarily from Apiaceous host plant records for Papaipema species of the umbel genus Heracleum. species. A few species of Papaipema are known to Recent field collections. During 1995, we exam­ feed on apiaceous plants, and although at least three of ined several eastern USA sites for larvae of both P these (P birdi, P harrisii and P enjngii Bird) appear to birdi and P harrisi. Visits to wetlands in western Con­ be speCialists on Apiaceae, the others exhibit a broader necticut and Massachusetts with dense populations of range of apiaceous and non-apiaceous host use. The P Angelica atropurpurea yielded only two Papaipema bircli complex includes an eastern species (P birdi ) larvae (Papaipema harrisi has become deCidedly rare and two western species (P pertincta Dyar and P in­ in New England and is considered extirpated from sulidens [Bird] ), all of which are associated with the Massachusetts). However, visits to a calcareous sedge­ Apiaceae (= U mbelliferae). Papaipema birdi has been meadow complex in Otsego County, New York yielded considered oligophagous specialist on apiaceous more than two dozen Papaipema larvae from both An­ plants, its primary host being the water hemlock gelica atropurpurea and Cicuta maculata, All larvae Cicuta maculata L. Prior to the present study, other collected from C. maculata and A atropurpurea at the host records included Sium suave Walt. (Apiaceae), upstate New York site proved to be P birdi. Although and "other umbellates" (Hessel 1954:60; treating P reports of "other umbellates" than Cicuta maculata birch as a synonym of P marginidens, of which there and Sium suave occur in the literature (e,g" Kwiat are no known host records), as well as several astera­ 1916), our collections appear to be the first documen­ ceous plants (Kwiat 1916). The two other species in tation of Angelica atropurpurea as a host for P birdi. th e P birdi complex, P pertincta and P insulidens, Although Kwiat (1916) reported non-apiaceous hosts each of which have been recorded from both apia­ for P birdi, it is conceivable that the taxonomic confu­ ceous and non-apiaceous plants, are western species sion that typically surrounds Papaipema has resulted in apparently separated by the Cascade Mountains, with erroneous reporting of hosts subsequent to that publi­ P pertincta to the west and P insulidens to the east. A cation, host of P insulidens was described by Bird (1921, Our findings in the northwestern United States ex­ 1931) as a species of Senecio (Asteraceae). In the field tended the known host ranges of P pertincta and P in- VOLUME 57, NUMBER 2 155 TABLE 1. Collecting information and host associations of western PapaipellUl species discovered during this study. Species Locality Life stage Host plant Dates P. pertincta Oregon: Tillamook Co.: Rt. 101, 4 larvae Heracleum maximum 8 July 1995 1 mi S. of Wheeler Oregon: Clatsop Co.: Rt. 101, 9 larvae, 1 pupa Cicuta douglasii 8 July 1995 8 mi. S. of Astoria (at jet. Rts. 101 & 30) Oregon Tillamook Co.: Rt. 101, 8 larvae Senecio vulgariS 9-10 July 1995 1-2 mi. N. of Manzanita 8 larvae Heracleum maximum 4 larvae Ligusticum apifolium 1 larva Daueus sp. 8 larvae Cirsium sp. 3 larvae ErechWes minima Oregon: Lincoln Co: , E.
Recommended publications
  • Lepidoptera of North America 5
    Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera by Valerio Albu, 1411 E. Sweetbriar Drive Fresno, CA 93720 and Eric Metzler, 1241 Kildale Square North Columbus, OH 43229 April 30, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration: Blueberry Sphinx (Paonias astylus (Drury)], an eastern endemic. Photo by Valeriu Albu. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Abstract A list of 1531 species ofLepidoptera is presented, collected over 15 years (1988 to 2002), in eleven southern West Virginia counties. A variety of collecting methods was used, including netting, light attracting, light trapping and pheromone trapping. The specimens were identified by the currently available pictorial sources and determination keys. Many were also sent to specialists for confirmation or identification. The majority of the data was from Kanawha County, reflecting the area of more intensive sampling effort by the senior author. This imbalance of data between Kanawha County and other counties should even out with further sampling of the area. Key Words: Appalachian Mountains,
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera, Noctuidae, Xyleninae)
    Zootaxa 3755 (2): 165–178 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2014 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3755.2.3 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6E3EB860-21C2-4F44-816E-DCCDAB6ECB0D A revision of the genus Protarchanara Beck, 1999 with description of a new genus and three new species (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae, Xyleninae) ANTON V. VOLYNKIN1, 5, ALEXEJ YU. MATOV2, PÉTER GYULAI3 & GOTTFRIED BEHOUNEK4 1Altai State University, Lenina str., 61, RF-656000, Barnaul, Russia; Tigirek State Natural Reserve, office 42, Nikitina str. 111, RF- 656043, Barnaul, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] 2Zoological Institute RAS, Universitetskaja emb. 1, RF-199034, Saint-Petersburg, Russia. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 3H-3530 Miskolc, Mélyvölgy 13/A, Hungary. E-mail: [email protected] 4Sudetenstrasse 6, В-85567 Graphing bei München, Germany. E-mail: [email protected] 5Corresponding author Abstract The genus Protarchanara Beck, 1999 is revised. The new genus Hydredes gen. n. (type species Hydredes yakobsoni sp. n.) is described. Three new species, Hydredes yakobsoni sp. n., H. shchetkini sp. n. and Protarchanara mythimnoida sp. n. are described from Central Asia. Two species, Arenostola delattini Wiltshire, 1953 and Hydraecia praecipua Hacker & Nekrasov, 2001 are transferred to the genus Hydredes gen. n. Protarchanara brevilinea impudica (Staudinger, 1892) stat. n. is upgraded to subspecific level. Lectotypes for Namangana contumax Püngeler, 1902, Sidemia (Luperina) johni Püngeler, 1914 and Nonagria impudica Staudinger, 1892 are designated. The adults and male and female genitalia are il- lustrated.
    [Show full text]
  • Working List of Prairie Restricted (Specialist) Insects in Wisconsin (11/26/2015)
    Working List of Prairie Restricted (Specialist) Insects in Wisconsin (11/26/2015) By Richard Henderson Research Ecologist, WI DNR Bureau of Science Services Summary This is a preliminary list of insects that are either well known, or likely, to be closely associated with Wisconsin’s original native prairie. These species are mostly dependent upon remnants of original prairie, or plantings/restorations of prairie where their hosts have been re-established (see discussion below), and thus are rarely found outside of these settings. The list also includes some species tied to native ecosystems that grade into prairie, such as savannas, sand barrens, fens, sedge meadow, and shallow marsh. The list is annotated with known host(s) of each insect, and the likelihood of its presence in the state (see key at end of list for specifics). This working list is a byproduct of a prairie invertebrate study I coordinated from1995-2005 that covered 6 Midwestern states and included 14 cooperators. The project surveyed insects on prairie remnants and investigated the effects of fire on those insects. It was funded in part by a series of grants from the US Fish and Wildlife Service. So far, the list has 475 species. However, this is a partial list at best, representing approximately only ¼ of the prairie-specialist insects likely present in the region (see discussion below). Significant input to this list is needed, as there are major taxa groups missing or greatly under represented. Such absence is not necessarily due to few or no prairie-specialists in those groups, but due more to lack of knowledge about life histories (at least published knowledge), unsettled taxonomy, and lack of taxonomic specialists currently working in those groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Errata and First Update to the 2010 Checklist of the Lepidoptera Of
    Errata and first uppppdate to the 2010 checklist of the Lepidoptera of Alberta Gregory R. Pohl, Jason J Dombroskie, Jean‐François Landry, Charles D Bird, and Vazrick Nazari lead author contact: [email protected] Introduction: Since the Annotated list of the Lepidoptera of Alberta was published in March 2010 (Pohl et al. 2010), a few typographical and nomenclatural errors have come to the authors' attention, as well as three erroneous AB records that were inadvertently omitted from that publication. Additionally, a considerable number of new AB species records have been brought to our attention since that checklist went to press. As expected, most are microlepidoptera. We detail all these items below, in what we hope will be a regular series of addenda to the AB list. If you are aware of further errors or additions to the AB Lepidoptera list, please contact the authors. Wit hin the NidNoctuoidea, there are a few minor iiiinconsistencies in the order of species wihiithin genera, and in the order of genera within tribes or subtribes, as compared to the sequence published by Lafontaine & Schmidt (2010). As well, the sequence of tribes in the AB list does not exactly match that of Lafontaine & Schmidt (2010), particularly in the Erebinae. We are not detailing those minor differences here unless they involve a move to a new genus or new higher taxonomic category. Errata: Abstract, p. 2, line 10, should read "1530... annotations are given" 41 Nemapogon granella (p. 55). Add Kearfott (1905) to the AB literature records. 78 Caloptilia syringella (p. 60). This species should be placed in the genus Gracillaria as per De Prins & De Prins (2005).
    [Show full text]
  • List of Insect Species Which May Be Tallgrass Prairie Specialists
    Conservation Biology Research Grants Program Division of Ecological Services © Minnesota Department of Natural Resources List of Insect Species which May Be Tallgrass Prairie Specialists Final Report to the USFWS Cooperating Agencies July 1, 1996 Catherine Reed Entomology Department 219 Hodson Hall University of Minnesota St. Paul MN 55108 phone 612-624-3423 e-mail [email protected] This study was funded in part by a grant from the USFWS and Cooperating Agencies. Table of Contents Summary.................................................................................................. 2 Introduction...............................................................................................2 Methods.....................................................................................................3 Results.....................................................................................................4 Discussion and Evaluation................................................................................................26 Recommendations....................................................................................29 References..............................................................................................33 Summary Approximately 728 insect and allied species and subspecies were considered to be possible prairie specialists based on any of the following criteria: defined as prairie specialists by authorities; required prairie plant species or genera as their adult or larval food; were obligate predators, parasites
    [Show full text]
  • BWSR Featured Plant Name: Purple-Stemmed Angelica
    BOARD OF WATER rn, AND SOIL RESOURCES 2018 December Plant of the Month BWSR Featured Plant Name: Purple-stemmed Angelica (Angelica atropurpurea) Plant family: Carrot (Apiaceae) Purple-stemmed A striking 6 to 9 feet tall, purple- Angelica grows in stemmed Angelica is one of moist conditions in full sun to part Minnesota’s tallest wildflowers. This shade, reaching as robust herbaceous perennial grows tall as 9 feet. along streambanks, shores, marshes, Photo Credit: calcareous fens, springs and sedge Karin Jokela, Xerces Society meadows — often in calcium-rich alkaline soils. The species epithet “atropurpurea” comes from the Latin words āter (“dark”) Plant Stats and purpūreus (“purple”), in reference to the deep purple color of the stem. WETLANDSTATEWIDE Flowers bloom from May to July. Like INDICATOR other plants in the carrot family, the STATUS: OBL flowers provide easy-to-access floral PLANTING resources for a wide diversity of flies, METHODS: bees and other pollinators. Although Bare-root, not confirmed for this species, the containers, nectar of other members of the Angelica seed genus can have an intoxicating effect on insects. Both butterflies and bumble bees are reported to lose flight ability, or fly clumsily, for a short period after consuming the nectar. Purple-stemmed Angelica is a host plant for the Eastern black swallowtail butterflyPapilio ( polyxenes asterius) and the umbellifera borer moth (Papaipema birdi). Uses Native American cultures. The consumption must be done projects. Restorationists plant also has many culinary with EXTREME CAUTION. appreciate its ability to Purple-stemmed Angelica uses: the flavorful stems are The similar water hemlock tolerate wet soils, part shade has a long history of human similar in texture to celery and poison hemlock are both and high weed pressure use.
    [Show full text]
  • Check List of Noctuid Moths (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae And
    Бiологiчний вiсник МДПУ імені Богдана Хмельницького 6 (2), стор. 87–97, 2016 Biological Bulletin of Bogdan Chmelnitskiy Melitopol State Pedagogical University, 6 (2), pp. 87–97, 2016 ARTICLE UDC 595.786 CHECK LIST OF NOCTUID MOTHS (LEPIDOPTERA: NOCTUIDAE AND EREBIDAE EXCLUDING LYMANTRIINAE AND ARCTIINAE) FROM THE SAUR MOUNTAINS (EAST KAZAKHSTAN AND NORTH-EAST CHINA) A.V. Volynkin1, 2, S.V. Titov3, M. Černila4 1 Altai State University, South Siberian Botanical Garden, Lenina pr. 61, Barnaul, 656049, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Tomsk State University, Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecology, Lenina pr. 36, 634050, Tomsk, Russia 3 The Research Centre for Environmental ‘Monitoring’, S. Toraighyrov Pavlodar State University, Lomova str. 64, KZ-140008, Pavlodar, Kazakhstan. E-mail: [email protected] 4 The Slovenian Museum of Natural History, Prešernova 20, SI-1001, Ljubljana, Slovenia. E-mail: [email protected] The paper contains data on the fauna of the Lepidoptera families Erebidae (excluding subfamilies Lymantriinae and Arctiinae) and Noctuidae of the Saur Mountains (East Kazakhstan). The check list includes 216 species. The map of collecting localities is presented. Key words: Lepidoptera, Noctuidae, Erebidae, Asia, Kazakhstan, Saur, fauna. INTRODUCTION The fauna of noctuoid moths (the families Erebidae and Noctuidae) of Kazakhstan is still poorly studied. Only the fauna of West Kazakhstan has been studied satisfactorily (Gorbunov 2011). On the faunas of other parts of the country, only fragmentary data are published (Lederer, 1853; 1855; Aibasov & Zhdanko 1982; Hacker & Peks 1990; Lehmann et al. 1998; Benedek & Bálint 2009; 2013; Korb 2013). In contrast to the West Kazakhstan, the fauna of noctuid moths of East Kazakhstan was studied inadequately.
    [Show full text]
  • The Apameini of Israel (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) SHILAP Revista De Lepidopterología, Vol
    SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología ISSN: 0300-5267 [email protected] Sociedad Hispano-Luso-Americana de Lepidopterología España Kravchenko, V. D.; Fibiger, M.; Mooser, J.; Junnila, A.; Müller, G. C. The Apameini of Israel (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología, vol. 36, núm. 142, junio, 2008, pp. 253-259 Sociedad Hispano-Luso-Americana de Lepidopterología Madrid, España Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=45512540015 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative SHILAP Nº 142 9/6/08 11:52 Página 253 SHILAP Revta. lepid., 36 (142), junio 2008: 253-259 CODEN: SRLPEF ISSN:0300-5267 The Apameini of Israel (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) V. D. Kravchenko, M. Fibiger, J. Mooser, A. Junnila & G. C. Müller Abstract In Israel, 20 species of tribe Apameini belonging to 10 genera have been found to date. Four species are endemic of the Levant (Sesamia ilonae, Luperina kravchenkoi, Gortyna gyulaii and Lenisa wiltshirei). Others are mostly Palaearctic, Mediterranean, Iranian and Irano-Turanian elements. Grassland species of the Apameini are mainly associated with the Temperate region and are univoltine with highest rate of occurrence in May, or in autumn. Most wetland and oases species are multivoltine and occur in oases and riverbeds over the country, though few of the species are extremely localized. The S. ilonae is presently known only from northern area of the Sea of Galilee, while A. deserticola is from oases of the Dead Sea area.
    [Show full text]
  • Borer Moth (Papaipema Marginidens (Guenee))
    Conservation Assessment for the Brick-Red Borer Moth (Papaipema marginidens (Guenee)) USDA Forest Service, Eastern Region December 6, 2005 James Bess OTIS Enterprises 13501 south 750 west Wanatah, Indiana 46390 This document is undergoing peer review, comments welcome This Conservation Assessment was prepared to compile the published and unpublished information on the subject taxon or community; or this document was prepared by another organization and provides information to serve as a Conservation Assessment for the Eastern Region of the Forest Service. It does not represent a management decision by the U.S. Forest Service. Though the best scientific information available was used and subject experts were consulted in preparation of this document, it is expected that new information will arise. In the spirit of continuous learning and adaptive management, if you have information that will assist in conserving the subject taxon, please contact the Eastern Region of the Forest Service - Threatened and Endangered Species Program at 310 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 580 Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53203. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS............................................................................................................ 1 NOMENCLATURE AND TAXONOMY ..................................................................................... 1 DESCRIPTION OF SPECIES.......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nota Lepidopterologica, 25.04.2012, ISSN 0342-7536 ©Societas Europaea Lepidopterologica; Download Unter Und
    ©Societas Europaea Lepidopterologica; download unter http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/ und www.zobodat.at Nota lepi. 35(1): 33-50 33 Additions to the checklist of Bombycoidea and Noctuoidea of the Volgo-Ural region. Part II. (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae, Erebidae, Nolidae, Noctuidae) Kari Nupponen ' & Michael Fibiger"^ Merenneidontie 19 D, FI-02320 Espoo, Finland; [email protected] ^ Deceased. 1 1 Received May 20 1 1 ; reviews returned September 20 1 ; accepted 3 December 2011. Subject Editor: Lauri Kaila. Abstract. Faunistic records additional to the recently published lists of Bombycoidea and Noctuoidea of the South Ural Mountains (Nupponen & Fibiger 2002, 2006) are presented, as well as some interesting records from the North Urals and the Lower Volga region. The material in the southern Urals was collected during 2006-2010 in six different expeditions, in North Ural in 2003 and 2007, and in the Lower Volga region in 2001, 2002, 2005, and 2006 in four expeditions. Four species are reported for the first time from Europe: Dichagyris latipennis (Piingeler, 1909), Pseudohermonassa melancholica (Lederer, 1853), Spae- lotis deplorata (Staudinger, 1897), and Xestia albonigra (Kononenko, 1981). Fourteen species are reported for the first time from the southern Urals. Altogether, records of 68 species are reported, including a few corrections to the previous articles. Further illustrations and notes on some poorly known taxa are given. Introduction The fauna of Bombycoidea and Noctuoidea of the southern Ural Mountains has been studied intensely since 1996, and the results of the research during 1996-2005 were published by Nupponen & Fibiger (2002, 2006). Since 2005, several further expedi- tions were made to the Urals by the first author.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Animal Species of North Carolina 2018
    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Animal Species of North Carolina 2018 Carolina Northern Flying Squirrel (Glaucomys sabrinus coloratus) photo by Clifton Avery Compiled by Judith Ratcliffe, Zoologist North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources www.ncnhp.org C ur Alleghany rit Ashe Northampton Gates C uc Surry am k Stokes P d Rockingham Caswell Person Vance Warren a e P s n Hertford e qu Chowan r Granville q ot ui a Mountains Watauga Halifax m nk an Wilkes Yadkin s Mitchell Avery Forsyth Orange Guilford Franklin Bertie Alamance Durham Nash Yancey Alexander Madison Caldwell Davie Edgecombe Washington Tyrrell Iredell Martin Dare Burke Davidson Wake McDowell Randolph Chatham Wilson Buncombe Catawba Rowan Beaufort Haywood Pitt Swain Hyde Lee Lincoln Greene Rutherford Johnston Graham Henderson Jackson Cabarrus Montgomery Harnett Cleveland Wayne Polk Gaston Stanly Cherokee Macon Transylvania Lenoir Mecklenburg Moore Clay Pamlico Hoke Union d Cumberland Jones Anson on Sampson hm Duplin ic Craven Piedmont R nd tla Onslow Carteret co S Robeson Bladen Pender Sandhills Columbus New Hanover Tidewater Coastal Plain Brunswick THE COUNTIES AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES OF NORTH CAROLINA Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Animal Species of North Carolina 2018 Compiled by Judith Ratcliffe, Zoologist North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org This list is dynamic and is revised frequently as new data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate. The list is published periodically, generally every two years.
    [Show full text]
  • CHECKLIST of WISCONSIN MOTHS (Superfamilies Mimallonoidea, Drepanoidea, Lasiocampoidea, Bombycoidea, Geometroidea, and Noctuoidea)
    WISCONSIN ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY SPECIAL PUBLICATION No. 6 JUNE 2018 CHECKLIST OF WISCONSIN MOTHS (Superfamilies Mimallonoidea, Drepanoidea, Lasiocampoidea, Bombycoidea, Geometroidea, and Noctuoidea) Leslie A. Ferge,1 George J. Balogh2 and Kyle E. Johnson3 ABSTRACT A total of 1284 species representing the thirteen families comprising the present checklist have been documented in Wisconsin, including 293 species of Geometridae, 252 species of Erebidae and 584 species of Noctuidae. Distributions are summarized using the six major natural divisions of Wisconsin; adult flight periods and statuses within the state are also reported. Examples of Wisconsin’s diverse native habitat types in each of the natural divisions have been systematically inventoried, and species associated with specialized habitats such as peatland, prairie, barrens and dunes are listed. INTRODUCTION This list is an updated version of the Wisconsin moth checklist by Ferge & Balogh (2000). A considerable amount of new information from has been accumulated in the 18 years since that initial publication. Over sixty species have been added, bringing the total to 1284 in the thirteen families comprising this checklist. These families are estimated to comprise approximately one-half of the state’s total moth fauna. Historical records of Wisconsin moths are relatively meager. Checklists including Wisconsin moths were compiled by Hoy (1883), Rauterberg (1900), Fernekes (1906) and Muttkowski (1907). Hoy's list was restricted to Racine County, the others to Milwaukee County. Records from these publications are of historical interest, but unfortunately few verifiable voucher specimens exist. Unverifiable identifications and minimal label data associated with older museum specimens limit the usefulness of this information. Covell (1970) compiled records of 222 Geometridae species, based on his examination of specimens representing at least 30 counties.
    [Show full text]