The Silos of American Catholicism and Their Connections to Cultural and National Identities: an Examination of Contemporary Ca

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Silos of American Catholicism and Their Connections to Cultural and National Identities: an Examination of Contemporary Ca THE SILOS OF AMERICAN CATHOLICISM AND THEIR CONNECTIONS TO CULTURAL AND NATIONAL IDENTITIES: AN EXAMINATION OF CONTEMPORARY CATHOLICISM WITH FR. JAMES MARTIN, SJ AND R.R. RENO Thesis Submitted to The College of Arts and Sciences of the UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Master of Arts in Theological Studies By Tiffany Alice Hunsinger, BA Dayton, Ohio August 2020 THE SILOS OF AMERICAN CATHOLICISM AND THEIR CONNECTIONS TO CULTURAL AND NATIONAL IDENTITIES: AN EXAMINATION OF CONTEMPORARY CATHOLICISM WITH FR. JAMES MARTIN, SJ AND R.R. RENO Name: Hunsinger, Tiffany Alice APPROVED BY: _________________________________________ William L. Portier, PhD. Committee Chair _________________________________________ Dr. Timothy Gabrielli, Ph.D. Faculty Reader _________________________________________ Sister Angela Ann Zukowski, Ph.D. Faculty Reader _________________________________________ Daniel S. Thompson, Ph.D. Chairperson ii © Copyright by Tiffany Alice Hunsinger All rights reserved 2020 iii ABSTRACT THE SILOS OF AMERICAN CATHOLICISM AND THEIR CONNECTIONS TO CULTURAL AND NATIONAL IDENTITIES: AN EXAMINATION OF CONTEMPORARY CATHOLICISM WITH FR. JAMES MARTIN, SJ AND R.R. RENO Name: Hunsinger, Tiffany Alice University of Dayton Advisor: Dr. William L. Portier The objective of this thesis is to outline the path of the American Church’s current polarization. Those represented by Father James Martin are not as engaged in the Traditional aspects of the Church, which loses credibility among those on the other “side.” On the other hand, those represented by R.R. Reno have embraced Tradition, but have the risk of falling into extremism that ignores Catholic Social Teaching as it is most widely interpreted. At the same time these sides are disputing, young adults are leaving the Church altogether at a drastic rate, which might make all this scholarship for naught. Through examining these sides from the viewpoint of migration into the United States, a common thread emerges that will bring the two sides together rather than further cleave them apart. However, as the American political stage shows in our current times, there appears to be no simple solution. iv Dedicated to my late Great-Grandmother Alice Whitehead v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I give special thanks to my advisor, Dr. William Portier, who has followed this project since my first semester in the 500C Historical Theology course. He has helped and continues to inspire my belief in the importance of grounding Theology in History. Furthermore, I am especially gratefully to the time, energy, and support he dedicated throughout this process. I know he exercised much patience in the process and has probably earned some time off in Purgatory. I also wish to thank my readers, Dr. Timothy Gabrielli and Sister Angela Ann Zukowski, both of whom provided a quick turnaround for my defense, which was further exacerbated by the Coronavirus. Both also offered their expertise as I shaped this project. As well as this, there are countless other scholars, professors, ministers, and friends that have inspired me immensely as I have embarked on this academic journey, especially those that honored me with the privilege of their time as I processed various ideas with them. Although the list is exhaustive, I would especially like to mention Dr. Sandra Yocum, Dr. Dennis Doyle, Dr. William Johnston, Fr. Silviu Bunta, Amy Doorley, Dr. Vincent Miller, Fr. Ted Cassidy, Fr. Jim Schimelfpening, Br. Tom Pieper, the Marianist community, and so many others of whom I beg their forgiveness because of their exclusion from this list. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT.......................................................................................................................iv DEDICATION....................................................................................................................v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS..................................................................................................vi INTRODUCTION TO THE SILOS OF AMERICAN CATHOLIC POLARIZATION …....1 CHAPTER I: R.R. RENO.................................................................................................23 CHAPTER II: FATHER JAMES MARTIN, SJ...............................................................41 CHAPTER III: MIGRATION..........................................................................................61 CONCLUSION..................................................................................................................99 REFERENCES................................................................................................................117 vii INTRODUCTION TO SILOS OF AMERICAN CATHOLIC POLARIZATION I took the Fall Semester of my senior year of undergraduate studies off. At the time, I had become stressed and could not see the point in finishing a degree at Purdue University. I had spent the two years prior becoming, my personal description, a “Catholic pro.” Dominican friars ran the Catholic parish literally in the middle of Purdue’s campus. Although Purdue is a public university, the friars still had a lot of sway, particularly the pastor. (In fact, he was often invited to graduation ceremonies to pray; it also provided him the opportunity to hug every student he knew as he/she received the diploma). As such, my whole life soon became wrapped up into proving the strength of my devotion. Because these Dominicans and their mostly male staff were extremely tradition-focused, this proved rather simple. In my case, as a woman, I merely needed to pray a Rosary every day, begin wearing a chapel veil, donate all of my pants, and work “part-time” with youth ministry and religious education. I had to also realize that my goal in life must be to become a stay-at-home mother or a nun (one that wears a habit). On top of that, the woman must always protect man’s virtue and embody pure, demure Mary, both mother and virgin, as best she could. After two years of this, I finally became disenchanted with this form of Catholicism. I found it impossible, or perhaps I just was not willing, to continue to subscribe to this faith system. Particularly as someone not raised in this tradition, I had finally had enough. Of course, when one is so entrenched in such a strong belief system, it is quite hard to escape. Perhaps because I had been blessed to be raised an eclectic pluralist and had experienced the direct damage that can come from this particular theology, I could literally and figuratively run away. As such, I moved to Chicago to live with brother and his family. I became a barista and swore off Catholicism, except I went to Confession every week. I walked to St. Peter’s in the Loop after my therapy appointments, just a couple of blocks away. My therapist, a Buddhist-type, taught me a lot about Jungian methods, a fun batch of therapeutic technique, but the Catholic guilt still existed. A priest once invited me to a young adult group at the parish, as a sort of weird penance. He promised not all Catholics were like the Dominicans. I did not believe him. Still, I made my way through the popular Chicago churches, not attending Mass, but just exploring. I went to St. John Cantius, known for Extraordinary Forms of Masses and the corresponding Latin Rosaries, for a Theology on Tap and learned more about exorcisms and mortal sin. I learned about social justice at Old St. Patrick’s, whose community centered itself on Hope, Kinship, and Hospitality. I marveled at Holy Name Cathedral and listened to a parishioner boast that St. John Paul II had once visited. I went to a few Polish parishes to witness the Polish language in a community setting. I explored the vastness of Catholicism during this time in Chicago, loving and despising all of it. At the same time, my questions about free will had begun to rise, so I went through some Aquinas and the philosophers all the Dominicans had loved. I had not yet found my answer and was growing bored of looking in the same places. Plus, Catholicism, religion in general, I had learned, functioned as an entity indescribable. Throughout my life, I had grown close to a variety of people professing, or not professing, various religious creeds. Yet, Catholicism, I had discovered, had a whole 2 different ruleset. For whatever reason, amidst horrible acts, people stayed. At the same time, Catholics condemned other Catholics. Some were “cafeteria” Catholics, some were “rad-trad” Catholics. James Martin was a heretic whose books should be burned, or he was a beacon with nice meditations and a popular book called My Life with the Saints. Pope Francis could be the antichrist, or he was the best thing to happen to the Catholic Church since the good intentions of Vatican II. Through this experience, and this research, I have discovered that the Church is yet again in a period of divisiveness. However, in the current era, it is more closely described as polarization, especially as it is located in the American Catholic experience. As such, this paper is meant to describe two sides of this polarization in the American Catholic Church, and outline its uniqueness to this time and place of the Church’s life. Polarization Divisions have existed in the Church since her conception. For example, any person can study the events of the Council of Nicaea and see a consensus was nowhere close to happening between all Christians there. In fact, Catholics have rarely all agreed on doctrine and Tradition. There has always been “in-fighting.” However, in this particular time,
Recommended publications
  • Liberal Catholicism in France, 1845-1670 Dissertation
    LIBERAL CATHOLICISM IN FRANCE, 1845-1670 DISSERTATION Presented Is fbrtial Ftalfillaent of the Requlreaents for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By JOHN KEITH HUOKABY, A. £., M. A, ****** The Ohio State University 1957 Approved by: CONTENTS Chapter Page I INTRODUCTION......................... 1 The Beginnings of Liberal Catholicism in F r a n c e ....................... 5 The Seoond Liberal Catholic Movement . 9 Issues Involved in the Catholic-Liberal Rapprochement . • ......... > . 17 I. The Challenge of Anticierlealism. • 17 II. Ohuroh-State Relatione........ 22 III.Political Liberalism and Liberal Catholic la n .................. 26 IV. Eeoncttlc Liberalism and Liberal Catholiciam ..... ........... 55 Scope and Nature of S t u d y .......... 46 II THE CAMPAIGN AGAINST THE UNIVERSITS.... 55 Lamennais vs. the Unlveralte........ 6l Oniv era it a under the July Monarchy. 66 Catholic and Unlversite Extremism .... 75 The Liberal Catholio Campaign ......... 61 III CHURCH-STATE RELATIONS................ 116 Traditional Attitudes ................. 117 The Program of L*Avaiilr........... 122 The Montalembert Formula* Mutual Independence but not Separation .... 129 Freedom of Conscience and Religion . 155 Syllabus of Errors ........... 165 17 GALL ICANISM AND ULTRAMONTANISM........... 177 Ultramontanism: de Maistre and Lamennais 160 The Second Liberal Catholic Movement. 165 The Vatican Council............. 202 V PAPAL SOVEREIGNTY AND ITALIAN UNITY. .... 222 71 POLITICAL OUTLOOK OF LIBERAL CATHOLICS . 249 Democracy and Political Equality .... 257 ii The Revolution of 1848 and Napoleon . 275 Quarantiem and Ant 1-etatlaae.............. 291 VII CONCLUSIONS.............................. 510 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY............................ 525 ill Chapter X INTRODUCTION In the aftermath of the French Revolution the Roman Catholic Church placed itself in opposition to the dynamic historical forces in nineteenth-century France.
    [Show full text]
  • Parties Groups with Answers.Pdf
    Parties/Groups Quiz MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choooe the one altunatlve that best S) Lobbying includes all of the following completes the ltatemeot or ....,... the question. EXCEPT I) African Americans, women, and people A) mounting advertising campaigns to with no college education tend lo be alert the public about an issue A) Republicans B) hosting receptions and special events B) Democrats for members of Congress C) Independents C) approaching members of Congress D) Socialists as they walk through the Capitol E) Libertarians D) telephone calls to members of Congress E) scheduled face-to-face meetings with 2) Whites, men, and people with some college education tend to be members of Congress A) Independents B) Socialists 6) What role does the majority party C) Democrats undertake in legislatures at all levels? D) Libertarians A) Leading oversight and criticism of El Republicans ruling-party policies BJ Electing the legislature's leaders C) Making commitlee assignments 3) Political parties do all of the following D) Electing legislative leaders, making EXCEPT committee assignments, and holding A) campaigning for candidates BJ identifying potential candidates the majority on committees E) Holding a majority on committees C) identifying a narrow issue concern DJ organizing elections El nominating candidates to run for 7) Federalist 10 suggests that the framers of the office Constitution were: A) in favor of strong political parties. B) in support of parties as a necessary 4) Interest groups can ensure that laws condition of democratic government. passed by legislatures and signed by C) suspicious of parties. executives are in keeping with current O) oblivious to parties.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright by Rhiannon Jade Goad 2013
    Copyright by Rhiannon Jade Goad 2013 The Thesis Committee for Rhiannon Jade Goad Certifies that this is the approved version of the following thesis: “Dr. Paul Cured my Apathy”: Ron Paul’s Libertarian Discourse APPROVED BY SUPERVISING COMMITTEE: Supervisor: Susan S Heinzelman Christopher King “Dr. Paul Cured my Apathy”: Ron Paul’s Libertarian Discourse by Rhiannon Jade Goad, B.A. Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degrees of Master of Arts and Master of Public Affairs The University of Texas at Austin August 2013 Abstract “Dr. Paul Cured my Apathy”: Ron Paul’s Libertarian Discourse Rhiannon Jade Goad, M.A.;M.Paff The University of Texas at Austin, 2013 Supervisor: Susan S Heizelman During the 2008 and 2012 presidential elections, many young white men found a political hero in the 77-year-old Republican Congressman from Texas, whose rallies often center on obscure, technical arguments concerning the Federal Reserve. It is because of the grassroots support of the young white men who adore him that Ron Paul has become a major figure in today’s political scene. What attracts young white men to Ron Paul? This paper explores the history and discourse of Libertarianism to better understand the political subjectivity and identity of Ron Paul supporters. In Chapter 2, I historically contextualize Paul’s libertarian discourse. I argue that the discourse of libertarianism is characterized by claims to an apolitical, ahistorical past in which Libertarian rhetoric naturalizes discourses of free market capitalism, “classical” liberalism, and “authentic” Americanism.
    [Show full text]
  • Richard Rohr – Is His Teaching Biblical?
    Richard Rohr – Is His Teaching Biblical? By Jane Krammer, Anglican Mainstream1. This paper has been researched and written as a result of a deep concern over those Christian friends who have turned away from a more biblically based Christian faith to follow the teachings of Richard Rohr and the Center for Action and Contemplation. Many consider Rohr’s teachings very attractive, like flashes of gold in the mundanities of life. He is often spoken of in glowing terms; and his following continues to grow, spreading through friendship groups and social media. However Rohr’s use of biblical terminology and Christian sounding language is deceptive, lulling his readers into a false sense of security, whilst feeding them a mixed diet of mysticism, self-help spirituality, social justice, biblical inaccuracies and false doctrine. In this way the biblical faith of his followers is progressively and systematically undermined. Those who become more deeply embedded in his teaching have a demonstrated tendency to turn away from upholding Jesus Christ as Son of God and our only Lord and Saviour. Richard Rohr’s ideas and teaching seem to be continually evolving and also adapting in response to criticism – which makes it hard to arrive at his completely definitive answer on some subjects. I started this paper by thoroughly studying 2011 Rohr’s teaching from his book Falling Upwards, before turning to some of his daily online meditations 2015-20172, in which he develops some key themes, which are touched on but not elaborated, in Falling Upwards. In this paper I have sought to examine some of the most significant themes in Rohr’s teaching (notably ‘dualism’ and ‘the Cosmic Christ’ as well as his views on biblical authority, the deity of Jesus, atonement and the cross), I have then tried to give a more biblical perspective on these.
    [Show full text]
  • Love Them Both? Pro-Woman, Pro-Life: New Policy Frames in The
    Love Them Both? Pro-Woman, Pro-Life: New Policy Frames in the Anti-Abortion Movement Ebba Wallin Eriksson Supervisor: Josefina Erikson Bachelor Thesis, Political Science Department of Government Uppsala University, Spring 2020 Word count: 11281 Page count: 42 Table of Contents 1. Introduction 3 1.1. Aim and Research Questions 4 1.2. Disposition 5 1.3. Definitions 5 2. Theoretical Framework 6 2.1. The American Anti-abortion Movement: Before and After Roe v. Wade 6 2.2. Emergence of the Pro-Woman, Pro-Life Faction 7 2.3. Frame Analysis and Frame Alignment Processes 8 2.4. Frame Extension and Frame Transformation in the Pro-Life Movement 10 3. Research Design 11 3.1. Empirical Research of Frames 12 3.2. Choice of Method and Analytical Framework 14 3.3. Material and Context 15 3.4. Sample 17 4. Findings and Discussion 18 4.1. Findings 18 4.1.1 The Fetal Rights Frame 18 4.1.2 The Pro-Death Frame 21 4.1.3. The Selfish Mother Frame 22 4.1.4. The Coercion Frame 24 4.1.5. The Medical Advances Frame 25 4.1.6. The PAS Frame 26 4.2. Discussion 27 5. Conclusion 30 References 32 Appendix 37 2 1. Introduction In 1973, the US Supreme Court established that abortion is a constitutional right with the landmark ruling Roe v. Wade (410 U.S. 113). The Court recognized fetus viability as the earliest ​ ​ ​ stage of when the state may prohibit a woman from obtaining an abortion. Viability, defined as the point of fetal development where the fetus can survive outside the womb, was estimated to occur at the gestational age of 28 weeks.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Oppositional Frames in Evaluating Movement Success: National and Local Debates Over Sex Education Programming
    Analysis of Oppositional Frames in Evaluating Movement Success: National and Local Debates Over Sex Education Programming Lauren Finkel Haverford College, Department of Political Science Advisor: Professor Steve McGovern Senior Thesis 13 April 2009 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................................2 Introduction ..............................................................................................................................3 Literature Review......................................................................................................................7 Components of Framing Theory ....................................................................................7 Frame Alignment .....................................................................................................8 Frame Bridging ...............................................................................................8 Frame Amplification .......................................................................................9 Frame Extension .............................................................................................9 Frame Transformation .................................................................................10 Oppositional Framing ............................................................................................10 Boundary Framing ........................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • The Renewal of Catholic Americanism David J
    University of Dayton eCommons Marianist Award Lectures U.S. Catholic Special Collection 2005 The iM ssing Piece: The Renewal of Catholic Americanism David J. O'Brien Follow this and additional works at: http://ecommons.udayton.edu/uscc_marianist_award Recommended Citation O'Brien, David J., "The iM ssing Piece: The Renewal of Catholic Americanism" (2005). Marianist Award Lectures. 3. http://ecommons.udayton.edu/uscc_marianist_award/3 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Catholic Special Collection at eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Marianist Award Lectures by an authorized administrator of eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. US.CATH BX 1406.2 .027 2005 THE MISSING PIECE: THE RENEWAL OF CATHOLIC AMERICANISM by DAVID J. O'BRIEN Marianist Award Lecture 2005 THE UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON It j· • I I 1 1 , ~ . rf '· Copyright© 2008 by The University of Dayton u~.CATM BX ,qo&.~---------------------------------------------­ o'l."T 2b05 David}. O'Brien is Loyola Professor of Roman Catholic Studies at the College of the Holy Cross in Worcester, Massachusetts, where he has been on the faculty since 1969. He holds a B.A. from the University ofNotre Dame and a doctorate in History from the University of Rochester. Among other honors, he has been awarded several honorary doctorates. His service to U.S. Catholic higher education and to the U.S. Catholic Church includes membership in or work with the American Catholic Historical &so­ dation {of which he served as president, 1998-99); the Atlsociation of Catholic Colleges and Universities; the Catholic Committee on Urban Ministry; Catholic Peace Fellowship; the Diocese ofWorcester; the boards of Cross Currents, Church History, Religion and A~erican Culture and National Catholic Reporter; the Na­ tional Conference of Catholic Bishops; the National Council of Churches; and Pax Christi.
    [Show full text]
  • Catholic Social Thought, Political Liberalism and the Idea of Human Rights
    Journal of Christian legal Thought fall 2011 Catholic Social Thought, Political Liberalism and the Idea of Human Rights By Zachary R. Calo, Valparaiso University School of Law I. The Morality of Human Rights own assumptions, methods, and anthropology. The Human rights is the dominant moral category plurality that resides within the liberal human rights of modernity. As both a theoretical concept and tradition, particularly that located on the boundary the basis of legal norms, human rights shapes the of secularism and religion, is a necessary backdrop way we think and talk about personhood, social to engaging emerging debates about such significant justice, and political obligation. Yet, it is also the topics as religious pluralism and religious law. It case that there is no one account of human rights, also must shape our reflections on foundational but rather competing traditions of human rights questions about the limits and possibilities of human that strive for primacy. Human rights, in short, is a rights law.1 deeply contested category through which different This paper does not engage these broader moral visions aim to shape institutions and policies. contested issues but rather considers the background In spite of the label, human rights claims are not question of how religious traditions, in this case the universal either methodologically or substantively. social thought of the Catholic church, has engaged Rather, under the umbrella of human rights is the idea of human rights and the liberal tradition located a constant struggle between the universal more generally. In particular, this case study aims and the particular. How this tension unfolds, and to illuminate the process by which Catholicism whether it does so in a constructive or disruptive developed a native human rights tradition and manner, is one of the foundational questions that how, in turn, this tradition is distinguished from must be engaged in coming years.
    [Show full text]
  • Dilthey and Carnap: the Feeling of Life, the Scientifc Worldview, and the Elimination of Metaphysics
    CHAPTER 12 Dilthey and Carnap: The Feeling of Life, the Scientifc Worldview, and the Elimination of Metaphysics Eric S. Nelson INTRODUCTION In this chapter I will propose a reinterpretation of the early Vienna Circle’s project of radical empiricism by reconsidering it in light of its under-appreciated Continental sources. After briefy discussing recent challenges to the standard view of logical positivism, such as its social- political context in “Red Vienna,” I examine the impact of “life- philosophical” thinkers such as Nietzsche and—in particular—Dilthey on the thought of Rudolf Carnap. Dilthey’s modernistic advocacy for empirical scientifc inquiry and his far-reaching critique of metaphysics as refecting a conceptually unjustifable and indemonstrable perspective expressing a “feeling of life” and interpretively (affectively, pragmatically) articulated in a “worldview” was embraced, via Dilthey’s student and Carnap’s teacher Herman Nohl (1879–1960), in Carnap’s pre- physicalist writings of the 1920s and the Vienna Circle’s 1929 manifesto. Such E.S. Nelson (*) Division of the Humanities, Academic Building, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Kowloon, Hong Kong © The Author(s) 2018 321 J. Feichtinger et al. (eds.), The Worlds of Positivism, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65762-2_12 322 E.S. NELSON works announced the task of overcoming metaphysics and defending the scientifc life-stance (Lebenshaltung) against its authoritarian, metaphysi- cal, and religious detractors. The argument developed here concerns the philosophical and social-political nexus of life, science, and metaphysics in Dilthey and Carnap. Popularized or “vulgar” expressions of what came to be called Lebensphilosophie often served a reactionary role in Germanic culture in conservative cultural critics such as Ludwig Klages and Oswald Spengler.
    [Show full text]
  • Theatre Beyond Space and Time
    Theatre Beyond Space and Time Reza Abdoh in conversation with Gautam Dasgupta he brilliant, visionary artist Reza Abdoh (1963–1995) was an Iranian-born theatre director, playwright, and founder of his own theatre company Dar T A Luz. Encompassing theatre, dance, literature, pop culture, video, and myth, his works include Bogeyman, Father Was a Peculiar Man, Tight Right White, and Quotations from a Ruined City, and were primarily seen in Los Angeles, New York City, and Europe. The PAJ Publications title Reza Abdoh, edited by Daniel Mufson, featuring essays on him and the text of The Hip-Hop Waltz of Eurydice, was published in 1999. His play, The Law of Remains, appears in the PAJ volume Plays for the End of the Century (1996). Abdoh’s work was so daring and original that the memory of his theatre productions, produced often in abandoned or site-specific spaces, has long remained for those who were fortunate to see his work, and then spread to those who never had that opportunity. Since Abdoh’s death, a documentary of his life has been made by Adam Soch. Reza Abdoh, a retrospective of the artist’s work, opened on June 3, 2018, at MoMA PS1 in Queens. The interview published here for the first time is from the archive of PAJ Publications. It was taped on April 7, 1994. Let’s start off with the most embarrassing of our questions. You have often been referred to in the press as the bad boy, the enfant terrible of the American theatre. Do you actu- ally see yourself as being deliberately provocative? No.
    [Show full text]
  • Social & Behavioural Sciences 19Th PCSF 2019 Professional Culture Of
    The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences EpSBS ISSN: 2357-1330 https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2019.12.1 19th PCSF 2019 Professional Culture of the Specialist of the Future SELF-ASSESSMENT OF PERSONAL CIVIC IDENTITY IN ADOLESCENTS Tatiana Bespalova (a), Olga Tenyaeva (b)*, Sergey Kudinov (c) *Corresponding author (a) Ryazan State University named after S.A. Yesenin, Ryazan, Russia, [email protected], 8(910)500-37-91 (b) Ryazan State University named after S.A. Yesenin, Ryazan, Russia, [email protected], 8(960)570-58-41 (c) Peoples ' friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russia, [email protected], 8(962)965-06-16 Abstract The psychological nature of personal civic identity remains underinvestigated. Issues related to its motivation, the mechanisms of its formation, its implementation, etc. remain unsolved. The paper presents a theoretical review of modern approaches to the investigation of personal civic identity. It deals with psychological aspects of personal identity as a psychological phenomenon. The author employs her own methodology of investigating self-assessment of personal civic identity in adolescents. The research involves 208 humanitarian students of Ryazan State University named for S. A. Yesenin (Ryazan, Russia). The research indicates that there are only a few people showing high-level personal civic identity. Students of this category are characterized by a formed axiological sphere, which presupposes deep understanding of their civic stand, independence in their life choices, willingness to develop into members of civic society. People with low-level civic identity are characterized by extreme egocentricity and self-oriented motivation, underdeveloped self-regulatory functions, rigid thinking, stereotyped behavior patterns.
    [Show full text]
  • Tocqueville Chapter Craiutu and Holbreich FINAL (February 7, 2015)
    1 To be published in Combining the Spirit of Religion and the Spirit of Liberty: Tocqueville’s Thesis Revisited, ed. Michael Zuckert (University of Chicago Press, 2015) Aurelian Craiutu and Matthew N. Holbreich On Faith and Democracy as a New Form of Religion: A Few Tocquevillian Reflections1 “Faith in common opinion will become a sort of religion whose prophet will be the majority” ~ Tocqueville I. A problem of liberal modernity? Three decades ago, in his influential book After Virtue (1981), Alasdair MacIntyre advanced one of the most trenchant arguments against liberalism that has elicited a wide array of responses and heated debates. The values of economic and political liberalism, he argued, are based on (what he called) an emotivist and relativist culture which uncritically celebrates the total autonomy of the individual will and slowly leads to the gradual but inevitable decomposition of the social fabric. The main culprit, in MacIntyre’s view, is liberal individualism, the dominant doctrine of the last three centuries that shapes our norms and beliefs and has had a strong influence upon our social institutions and values. As society becomes atomized, so the story goes, it eventually turns into a mere “collection of citizens of nowhere,”2 detached from each other and pursuing interests that are often at odds with the common good. “The barbarians are not waiting beyond the frontiers,” MacIntyre warned his readers, “they have already been governing us for quite some time and it is our lack of consciousness of this that constitutes part of our predicament.”3 2 MacIntyre’s critique of liberal modernity still resonates today and the debate seems unlikely to be settled anytime soon.
    [Show full text]