DOCSLIB.ORG

REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS in the AGE of HUMAN RIGHTS Pro牛

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS in the AGE of HUMAN RIGHTS Pro牛 ALISA VON HAGEL & DANIELA MANSBACH REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS IN THE AGE OF HUMAN RIGHTS - Reproductive Rights in the Age of Human Rights Alisa Von Hagel • Daniela Mansbach Reproductive Rights in the Age of Human Rights Pro-life Politics from Roe to Hobby Lobby Alisa Von Hagel Daniela Mansbach University of Wisconsin University of Wisconsin Superior, WI , USA Superior, WI , USA ISBN 978-1-137-53951-9 ISBN 978-1-137-53952-6 (eBook) DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-53952-6 Library of Congress Control Number: 2016937740 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifi cally the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfi lms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specifi c statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. Cover design by Emma J Hardy Printed on acid-free paper This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by Springer Nature The registered company is Nature America Inc. New York CONTENTS 1 The Reproductive Rights Debate in the Age of Human Rights 1 2 The Fight over Abortion: Fetal Rights in the Post-Roe Era 29 3 Love Them Both: Pro-life Is Pro-women 87 4 Defending the People: Third-Party Interests in the Debate over Reproductive Rights 141 5 Between Conservatism and Libertarianism: Pro-life Strategy After the ACA 183 6 The Future of Reproductive Rights in the Age of Human Rights 213 Court Cases, Appeals, and Briefs 237 Federal Law 239 v vi CONTENTS Proposed Laws 241 State Laws 243 Proposed State Laws 245 Index 247 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 5.1 Chip Bok Editorial Cartoon used with the permission of Chip Bok and Creators Syndicate. All rights reserved. 197 vii LIST OF TABLES Table 1.1 Pro-life arguments in The New York Times and Washington Post 7 Table 1.2 Pro-life websites 9 Table 1.3 Typology for public policy 11 Table 1.4 Federal (proposed and enacted) and state (enacted) legislation, including pro-life and pro-choice policy 12 ix CHAPTER 1 The Reproductive Rights Debate in the Age of Human Rights 1 INTRODUCTION In June 2014, the Supreme Court handed down their ruling in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, a case involving a challenge to the 2010 law, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA, which will here-in after be referred to as ACA). For-profi t corporations challenged the require- ment that health insurance plans with prescription coverage include all Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved forms of contracep- tion. These corporations argued that this mandate violates the protec- tions of religious liberty established in the free exercise clause of the First Amendment and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA). The court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, fi nding the requirement was a violation of federal law, because it created a substantial burden on the religious beliefs of the corporate entities in question. The ruling opens the possibility for further restrictions on abortion that are based on the protection of individuals’ right to religious liberty. Thus, although the case focused specifi cally on the employer mandate, many in the pro- life movement view this ruling as a victory in their struggle to limit—and eventually eliminate—the right to abortion. The debate over abortion has always included discussion of the rights of third-party actors who are secondary in the procedure itself; the right of medical professionals to refuse to participate in abortion or abortion- related services had been established since the 1970s. Specifi cally, the Church Amendment was adopted in 1973, prohibiting government © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 1 A. Von Hagel, D. Mansbach, Reproductive Rights in the Age of Human Rights, DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-53952-6_1 2 REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS IN THE AGE OF HUMAN RIGHTS offi cials from requiring physicians to perform abortion or sterilization based upon moral or religious objections to the practice. Further, restrictions on public funding for abortion were also fi rst enacted during the 1970s, with the fi rst prohibition on government funding for abortion passed in 1976. The Hyde Amendment, attached to the 1976 spending bill for the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, pro- hibited funding for abortion, primarily affecting Medicaid programming. Both conscience clauses and funding restrictions on abortion continue to be enacted at both the federal and state levels. Furthermore, both types of policies have greatly expanded over time in terms of the effect and breadth of the protections and restrictions imposed. These two types of public policies have proven to be the most effective means for restricting or limiting access to abortion, particularly at the fed- eral level. Nevertheless, until the case of Hobby Lobby , the pro-life strategy rarely focused on the rights of third-party actors. Prior to the Hobby Lobby case, the pro-life movement centered its attention on the rights of the fetus and the rights of women, the two subjects involved in the abortion procedure. In advocating for fetal rights, the primary focus and intent of the pro-life movement has been to eliminate access to abortion and secure the overturning of the decision in Roe v. Wade . This strategy, based upon the belief in the sanctity of life and the assumption that life begins at the moment of fertilization, represented the central focus of the move- ment until the mid-1990s. The failure to secure this goal—the complete elimination of the right to abortion—as well as the inability to produce any substantial change in public opinion regarding abortion led to the adoption of a new strategy. This new strategy focuses on women’s rights and well-being, arguing that abortion physically and emotionally harms women. As a result, this strategy focuses on limiting access to abortion rather than eliminating it altogether. The development of the women- centered strategy has demonstrated that the pro-life movement is adaptable to changing circumstances and contexts, using new arguments and strategies to promote their cause. The passage of the ACA in 2010, and the Hobby Lobby ruling in 2014, led to the adoption of new strategy by the pro-life movement, which complements the fetus-centered and women-centered strategies. This latest strategy advocates for the rights of third-party actors such as employers, with a special focus on the argument of religious liberty. As such, the ruling in Hobby Lobby introduces two main changes into the ear- lier pro-life discourse and its related public policy. First, the ruling shifted THE REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS DEBATE IN THE AGE OF HUMAN RIGHTS 3 attention from rights that were traditionally at the heart of the debate over reproductive choices—such as the right to life, women’s liberty and autonomy, and reproductive rights—to religious liberty. Specifi cally, both the fetus- centered and women-centered discourses aimed to change peo- ple’s opinion on abortion through emphasis on the sanctity of life as well as the harm abortion causes women. The focus on freedom of religion, however, shifts the argument away from the debate over the meaning and implications of abortion; in this case, supporting the pro-life movement does not require people to oppose abortion, only to agree that individuals have the right to freedom of religion, or, more generally, freedom from government control. In addition to the changing argument, the focus on religious liberty also represents a shift in pro-life strategy; while the movement has historically been driven by religious adherents who believe in the sanctity of life because of biblical dictates, the movement as a whole has worked to minimize the use of religious arguments, particularly in their public campaigns and fetus-centered discourse. Including religious liberty as a right that is violated during the course of an abortion adds to the issues that are part of the debate over reproductive rights, while also allowing the pro-life movement to further distinguish their work from that of the pro-choice movement. Second, this ruling introduces a new set of actors in need of protection in the practice of abortion. Initially, the pro-life movement focused solely on the protection of the fetus, placing the movement in opposition to the pro-choice movement, which advocates for women’s reproductive choice and autonomy. This fetus-centered discourse often defi ned women as the source of the threat, situating them in direct confl ict with the fetus that needs to be saved. Through subsuming women’s rights and health within their discourse in the 1990s, the pro-life movement was able to address the critique of pro-choice activists, as well as others who demanded that women’s complex decision-making process is taken seriously. With the Hobby Lobby ruling, the pro-life movement expands the participants they will protect, adding employers to the other third party actors they aim to protect.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Parties Groups with Answers.Pdf
    Parties/Groups Quiz MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choooe the one altunatlve that best S) Lobbying includes all of the following completes the ltatemeot or ....,... the question. EXCEPT I) African Americans, women, and people A) mounting advertising campaigns to with no college education tend lo be alert the public about an issue A) Republicans B) hosting receptions and special events B) Democrats for members of Congress C) Independents C) approaching members of Congress D) Socialists as they walk through the Capitol E) Libertarians D) telephone calls to members of Congress E) scheduled face-to-face meetings with 2) Whites, men, and people with some college education tend to be members of Congress A) Independents B) Socialists 6) What role does the majority party C) Democrats undertake in legislatures at all levels? D) Libertarians A) Leading oversight and criticism of El Republicans ruling-party policies BJ Electing the legislature's leaders C) Making commitlee assignments 3) Political parties do all of the following D) Electing legislative leaders, making EXCEPT committee assignments, and holding A) campaigning for candidates BJ identifying potential candidates the majority on committees E) Holding a majority on committees C) identifying a narrow issue concern DJ organizing elections El nominating candidates to run for 7) Federalist 10 suggests that the framers of the office Constitution were: A) in favor of strong political parties. B) in support of parties as a necessary 4) Interest groups can ensure that laws condition of democratic government. passed by legislatures and signed by C) suspicious of parties. executives are in keeping with current O) oblivious to parties.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright by Rhiannon Jade Goad 2013
    Copyright by Rhiannon Jade Goad 2013 The Thesis Committee for Rhiannon Jade Goad Certifies that this is the approved version of the following thesis: “Dr. Paul Cured my Apathy”: Ron Paul’s Libertarian Discourse APPROVED BY SUPERVISING COMMITTEE: Supervisor: Susan S Heinzelman Christopher King “Dr. Paul Cured my Apathy”: Ron Paul’s Libertarian Discourse by Rhiannon Jade Goad, B.A. Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degrees of Master of Arts and Master of Public Affairs The University of Texas at Austin August 2013 Abstract “Dr. Paul Cured my Apathy”: Ron Paul’s Libertarian Discourse Rhiannon Jade Goad, M.A.;M.Paff The University of Texas at Austin, 2013 Supervisor: Susan S Heizelman During the 2008 and 2012 presidential elections, many young white men found a political hero in the 77-year-old Republican Congressman from Texas, whose rallies often center on obscure, technical arguments concerning the Federal Reserve. It is because of the grassroots support of the young white men who adore him that Ron Paul has become a major figure in today’s political scene. What attracts young white men to Ron Paul? This paper explores the history and discourse of Libertarianism to better understand the political subjectivity and identity of Ron Paul supporters. In Chapter 2, I historically contextualize Paul’s libertarian discourse. I argue that the discourse of libertarianism is characterized by claims to an apolitical, ahistorical past in which Libertarian rhetoric naturalizes discourses of free market capitalism, “classical” liberalism, and “authentic” Americanism.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Supreme Court of the United States
    No. 19-1392 In The Supreme Court of the United States THOMAS E. DOBBS, M.D., M.P.H., STATE HEALTH OFFICER OF THE MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, ET AL., Petitioners, v. JACKSON WOMEN’S HEALTH ORGANIZATION, ET AL., Respondents. On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit AMICUS BRIEF OF THE ELLIOT INSTITUTE IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONERS THOMAS P. MONAGHAN JAY ALAN SEKULOW CECILIA NOLAND-HEIL Counsel of Record FRANCIS J. MANION STUART J. ROTH GEOFFREY R. SURTEES COLBY M. MAY AMERICAN CENTER FOR WALTER M. WEBER LAW & JUSTICE LAURA HERNANDEZ 1000 Regent University AMERICAN CENTER FOR Drive LAW & JUSTICE Virginia Beach, VA 23464 201 Maryland Ave., N.E. (757) 226-2489 Washington, DC 20002 (202) 546-8890 [email protected] Counsel for Amicus ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page QUESTION PRESENTED..................... i TABLE OF AUTHORITIES....................iv INTEREST OF AMICUS...................... 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT................... 1 ARGUMENT................................ 2 I. ABORTION IS A POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS PROCEDURE................3 A. Ambulance calls........................ 3 B. Maternal abortion deaths................ 5 II. THE CLAIM THAT ABORTION IS SAFER THAN CHILDBIRTH IS NOT SUPPORTED AND MOST LIKELY FALSE ............... 7 A. Relevance to abortion jurisprudence........ 7 B. Repetition of the fiction.................. 8 C. Refutation of the fiction and possible backpedaling.......................... 10 D. Dissecting the fiction................... 12 E. Response to contrary statements in Whole Woman's Health ....................... 19 III. PUBLISHED LITERATURE INDICATES THAT ABORTION IS MORE DANGEROUS THAN CONTINUED PREGNANCY......... 21 iii CONCLUSION..............................26 APPENDIX A: Correspondence with HHS/CDC . 1a APPENDIX B: Documented ambulance calls 2009-21 ............................... 10a iv TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page CASES City of Akron v.
    [Show full text]
  • Love Them Both? Pro-Woman, Pro-Life: New Policy Frames in The
    Love Them Both? Pro-Woman, Pro-Life: New Policy Frames in the Anti-Abortion Movement Ebba Wallin Eriksson Supervisor: Josefina Erikson Bachelor Thesis, Political Science Department of Government Uppsala University, Spring 2020 Word count: 11281 Page count: 42 Table of Contents 1. Introduction 3 1.1. Aim and Research Questions 4 1.2. Disposition 5 1.3. Definitions 5 2. Theoretical Framework 6 2.1. The American Anti-abortion Movement: Before and After Roe v. Wade 6 2.2. Emergence of the Pro-Woman, Pro-Life Faction 7 2.3. Frame Analysis and Frame Alignment Processes 8 2.4. Frame Extension and Frame Transformation in the Pro-Life Movement 10 3. Research Design 11 3.1. Empirical Research of Frames 12 3.2. Choice of Method and Analytical Framework 14 3.3. Material and Context 15 3.4. Sample 17 4. Findings and Discussion 18 4.1. Findings 18 4.1.1 The Fetal Rights Frame 18 4.1.2 The Pro-Death Frame 21 4.1.3. The Selfish Mother Frame 22 4.1.4. The Coercion Frame 24 4.1.5. The Medical Advances Frame 25 4.1.6. The PAS Frame 26 4.2. Discussion 27 5. Conclusion 30 References 32 Appendix 37 2 1. Introduction In 1973, the US Supreme Court established that abortion is a constitutional right with the landmark ruling Roe v. Wade (410 U.S. 113). The Court recognized fetus viability as the earliest ​ ​ ​ stage of when the state may prohibit a woman from obtaining an abortion. Viability, defined as the point of fetal development where the fetus can survive outside the womb, was estimated to occur at the gestational age of 28 weeks.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity Committee Newsletter
    Diversity Committee Newsletter Vol. 1, No. 1 — May 2015 Diversity Matters: A Historical to Present-Day Look at the NJSBA’s Commitment to Diversity and Inclusion by Milagros Camacho, Diversity Committee Co-chair n recognition of the fact that New Jersey is one of tenure she instructed the General Counsel Executive the most diverse states in the country, the New Committee (GCEC) to study what steps the bar associa- I Jersey State Bar Association (NJSBA) has accepted tion could take to achieve greater diversity. The GCEC, the proposition that only by embracing diversity and after a full and comprehensive review of all relevant working diligently toward creating an environment of issues, published nearly 30 well-considered recom- universal inclusion can our association become the type mendations in a report entitled “Blueprint for Diversity.” of fellowship that truly reflects the needs of the greater The association took this report to heart, and many of community we represent and the ideals upon which the those recommendations became part of the fabric of our NJSBA was created. This truism, one repeatedly and association. collegially impressed upon us by visionaries such as One such recommendation was the creation of a Mel Narol and countless others, formed the basis upon committee that prepared a final report on the recom- which a nascent cause became a movement, and while mendations to implement the goal of increasing diver- gathering strength in the process eventually evolved into sity in the bar. This led to the creation of an Ad Hoc a standing committee charged with the responsibility Committee on Diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Oppositional Frames in Evaluating Movement Success: National and Local Debates Over Sex Education Programming
    Analysis of Oppositional Frames in Evaluating Movement Success: National and Local Debates Over Sex Education Programming Lauren Finkel Haverford College, Department of Political Science Advisor: Professor Steve McGovern Senior Thesis 13 April 2009 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................................2 Introduction ..............................................................................................................................3 Literature Review......................................................................................................................7 Components of Framing Theory ....................................................................................7 Frame Alignment .....................................................................................................8 Frame Bridging ...............................................................................................8 Frame Amplification .......................................................................................9 Frame Extension .............................................................................................9 Frame Transformation .................................................................................10 Oppositional Framing ............................................................................................10 Boundary Framing ........................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Born Alive Infant Protection Act (SB 9)
    Born Alive Infant Protection Act (SB 9) Why is this necessary? • January 23, 2019: New York enacts legislation legalizing abortion until the moment of birth to a standing ovation. They continue the celebration by lighting the top of One World Trade Center pink.i • January 30, 2019: Virginia's Democratic Gov. Ralph Northam when discussing a late-term abortion bill tells WTOP radio, “The infant would be delivered; the infant would be kept comfortable; the infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desire, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother.” This comment brings the discussion on state-endorsed infanticide to the mainstream.ii • January 31, 2019: Sen. Ben Sasse (R- NE) files the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act (S. 311) in Congress requiring doctors to provide the proper degree of care to abortion survivors.iii • February 25, 2019: S. 311 is voted down 53 yeas– 44 nays. • January 13, 2020: KY Sen. Whitney Westerfield (R- Crofton) files the Born- Alive Infant Protection Act (SB 9), a variation of Sen. Sasse’s bill but applied at the state level.iv • February 25, 2020: S. 311 is voted down a second year in a row 56 yeas- 41 nays. • April 15, 2020: SB 9 passes the KY House of Representatives. Sent to Gov. Beshear’s desk. April 24, 2020: SB 9 is vetoed by Gov. Beshear. • January 22, 2021: A refiled SB 9 becomes law without Gov. Beshear’s signature after passing through the legislature. The left’s disregard if the unborn.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cognitive Dissonance of Religious Liberty Discourse: Statutory Rights Masquerading As Constitutional Mandates
    THE COGNITIVE DISSONANCE OF RELIGIOUS LIBERTY DISCOURSE: STATUTORY RIGHTS MASQUERADING AS CONSTITUTIONAL MANDATES MARCI A. HAMILTON* There is a cognitive dissonance in current religious liberty discourse. On the one hand, there are vulnerable groups emerging as strong rights holders in the culture, including LGBTQ, women, and children. On the other hand, there are the religious believers who cannot or will not fit this new social order into their worldview and, therefore, assert rights against it. In fact, the religious liberty “rights” asserted are not consti- tutional, but rather statutory.1 It is critically important that our public debate be built on this fact. Rights for the vulnerable are under attack by some religious actors who have sought to turn religious liberty into a weapon of exclusion, control, and harm. “Cognitive dissonance” is the “psychological conflict resulting from incongruous beliefs and attitudes held simultaneously,”2 and is often experienced as discomfort, which can lead the person to choose various routes away from the discomfort, such as denial or action.3 As politi- cally powerful religious actors experience unease in a culture they no longer control, there has been a multiplication of de- * Fox Professor of Practice, University of Pennsylvania. Thanks to the Federalist Society for bringing together experts with differing views on the most important topics of the day, and to John DiIulio, Leslie Griffin, Lia Howard, and Kathleen Kennedy Townsend for their thoughtful comments. 1. See, e.g., Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (RFRA), Pub. L. No. 103- 141, 107 Stat. 1488 (1993) (codified as amended at 42 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Dilthey and Carnap: the Feeling of Life, the Scientifc Worldview, and the Elimination of Metaphysics
    CHAPTER 12 Dilthey and Carnap: The Feeling of Life, the Scientifc Worldview, and the Elimination of Metaphysics Eric S. Nelson INTRODUCTION In this chapter I will propose a reinterpretation of the early Vienna Circle’s project of radical empiricism by reconsidering it in light of its under-appreciated Continental sources. After briefy discussing recent challenges to the standard view of logical positivism, such as its social- political context in “Red Vienna,” I examine the impact of “life- philosophical” thinkers such as Nietzsche and—in particular—Dilthey on the thought of Rudolf Carnap. Dilthey’s modernistic advocacy for empirical scientifc inquiry and his far-reaching critique of metaphysics as refecting a conceptually unjustifable and indemonstrable perspective expressing a “feeling of life” and interpretively (affectively, pragmatically) articulated in a “worldview” was embraced, via Dilthey’s student and Carnap’s teacher Herman Nohl (1879–1960), in Carnap’s pre- physicalist writings of the 1920s and the Vienna Circle’s 1929 manifesto. Such E.S. Nelson (*) Division of the Humanities, Academic Building, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Kowloon, Hong Kong © The Author(s) 2018 321 J. Feichtinger et al. (eds.), The Worlds of Positivism, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65762-2_12 322 E.S. NELSON works announced the task of overcoming metaphysics and defending the scientifc life-stance (Lebenshaltung) against its authoritarian, metaphysi- cal, and religious detractors. The argument developed here concerns the philosophical and social-political nexus of life, science, and metaphysics in Dilthey and Carnap. Popularized or “vulgar” expressions of what came to be called Lebensphilosophie often served a reactionary role in Germanic culture in conservative cultural critics such as Ludwig Klages and Oswald Spengler.
    [Show full text]
  • Theatre Beyond Space and Time
    Theatre Beyond Space and Time Reza Abdoh in conversation with Gautam Dasgupta he brilliant, visionary artist Reza Abdoh (1963–1995) was an Iranian-born theatre director, playwright, and founder of his own theatre company Dar T A Luz. Encompassing theatre, dance, literature, pop culture, video, and myth, his works include Bogeyman, Father Was a Peculiar Man, Tight Right White, and Quotations from a Ruined City, and were primarily seen in Los Angeles, New York City, and Europe. The PAJ Publications title Reza Abdoh, edited by Daniel Mufson, featuring essays on him and the text of The Hip-Hop Waltz of Eurydice, was published in 1999. His play, The Law of Remains, appears in the PAJ volume Plays for the End of the Century (1996). Abdoh’s work was so daring and original that the memory of his theatre productions, produced often in abandoned or site-specific spaces, has long remained for those who were fortunate to see his work, and then spread to those who never had that opportunity. Since Abdoh’s death, a documentary of his life has been made by Adam Soch. Reza Abdoh, a retrospective of the artist’s work, opened on June 3, 2018, at MoMA PS1 in Queens. The interview published here for the first time is from the archive of PAJ Publications. It was taped on April 7, 1994. Let’s start off with the most embarrassing of our questions. You have often been referred to in the press as the bad boy, the enfant terrible of the American theatre. Do you actu- ally see yourself as being deliberately provocative? No.
    [Show full text]
  • Social & Behavioural Sciences 19Th PCSF 2019 Professional Culture Of
    The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences EpSBS ISSN: 2357-1330 https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2019.12.1 19th PCSF 2019 Professional Culture of the Specialist of the Future SELF-ASSESSMENT OF PERSONAL CIVIC IDENTITY IN ADOLESCENTS Tatiana Bespalova (a), Olga Tenyaeva (b)*, Sergey Kudinov (c) *Corresponding author (a) Ryazan State University named after S.A. Yesenin, Ryazan, Russia, [email protected], 8(910)500-37-91 (b) Ryazan State University named after S.A. Yesenin, Ryazan, Russia, [email protected], 8(960)570-58-41 (c) Peoples ' friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russia, [email protected], 8(962)965-06-16 Abstract The psychological nature of personal civic identity remains underinvestigated. Issues related to its motivation, the mechanisms of its formation, its implementation, etc. remain unsolved. The paper presents a theoretical review of modern approaches to the investigation of personal civic identity. It deals with psychological aspects of personal identity as a psychological phenomenon. The author employs her own methodology of investigating self-assessment of personal civic identity in adolescents. The research involves 208 humanitarian students of Ryazan State University named for S. A. Yesenin (Ryazan, Russia). The research indicates that there are only a few people showing high-level personal civic identity. Students of this category are characterized by a formed axiological sphere, which presupposes deep understanding of their civic stand, independence in their life choices, willingness to develop into members of civic society. People with low-level civic identity are characterized by extreme egocentricity and self-oriented motivation, underdeveloped self-regulatory functions, rigid thinking, stereotyped behavior patterns.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the PDF Version Including House and Senate Voting Scorecards
    2016 LEGISLATIVE REPORT the conservative legislature from attacking Floridian’s Overview access to reproductive healthcare. In an unprecedented legislative session, elected officials introduced four onerous bills which didn’t just restrict The Florida Alliance of Planned Parenthood Affiliates is access to reproductive health services but attempted to the advocacy and political arm of Planned Parenthood end all access to abortion care in the state. In addition for health centers in Florida and represents the interests the first time, the Florida legislature attempted to defund of 22 health centers statewide, 15 of which provide Planned Parenthood health centers through the budget abortion care. Floridians know they can count on Planned process. The “Florida for Life Act” filed by Representative Parenthood for nonjudgmental, compassionate and Charles Van Zant attempted to ban all abortion services in affordable quality care. With nearly 70% of Planned the state and urged the United States Supreme Court to Parenthood health centers in medically underserved overturn Roe v Wade. The legislation has been filed for the areas or physician shortage areas, Planned Parenthood past seven years of the Representative’s legislative term is a reliable provider for communities in need. For years, but had never received a committee hearing because Planned Parenthood patients have experienced funding of constitutional concerns. This session, for the first time cuts to county health departments and preventive health ever, this unconstitutional legislation was heard in the services. Each year since 2012, Florida has experienced Civil Justice Subcommittee and passed favorably with 8 HIV infections rise even as they decline across the Republican yeas, 2 Democratic nays and 1 Republican country.
    [Show full text]