Darwin Skeptics a Select List of Science Academics, Scientists, and Scholars Who Are Skeptical of Darwinism

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Darwin Skeptics a Select List of Science Academics, Scientists, and Scholars Who Are Skeptical of Darwinism 8/24/2014 Darwin Skeptics A Select List of Science Academics, Scientists, and Scholars Who are Skeptical of Darwinism Compiled by Jerry Bergman PhD. It is commonly claimed that no scientist rejects macroevolution or Darwinism (by which is meant evolutionary naturalism, or the view that variation caused by mutations plus natural selection accounts for all life forms). For example, Dr. Steve Jones, Professor of Genetics at University College of London, wrote that “no scientist denies the central truth of The Origin, the idea of descent with modification... plants, animals and everything else descended from a common ancestor” (Jones, 2000, pp. xvii, xxiii). Other writers avoid the words “all” or “no scientist” and claim instead that “almost no scientist” rejects Darwinism as defined above. In an article refuting “wiccan creationism,” the author claimed that evolutionary theory has been confirmed to such a high degree and has such great explanatory power that it is the central organizing principle of the biological sciences today. Modern biology is basically unthinkable outside of the context of evolution and that is why it is accepted without reservations by pretty much every working scientists [sic] in the life sciences. It also isn’t really questioned in the other natural sciences, either, like physics or chemistry. The author then makes the following absolutist statement: Evolution is taken as a fact—and while there might be disagreements about some of the details of how evolution proceeds, there are no disagreements about the idea that it does occur and that it is the explanation for the diversity of life on our planet. Ashtaroth’s claim is exactly the opposite of the truth, which is that “almost no scientist puts any stock in any other attempted explanation for the diversity of life—especially creationism” (http://atheism.about.com/b/a/063194.htm accessed May 28, 2004, p. 1). This view is not an isolated example. The late Ernst Mayr, Alexander Agassiz Professor of Zoology at Harvard University, is “one of the most influential evolutionary theorists of our time” (Ferris, 2001, p. 326). Mayr declared that “no educated person any longer questions the validity of the so-called theory of evolution, which we now know to be a simple fact” (Mayr, 2001, p. 141). He has been claiming this for over 40 years—in 1967 he wrote that “evolution is accepted by every scientist” and for this reason it is no longer necessary to “enumerate painstakingly the proofs for evolution” (Mayr, 1967, p. v). In 1971, Mayr claimed that he did “not know of a single well-informed person who questions the factuality of evolution” (Mayr, 1971, p. 49). Not a single person! Mayr defines evolution, which he calls “Darwinism,” as the rejection of all supernatural phenomena and causations. The theory of evolution by natural selection explains the adaptedness and diversity of the world solely materialistically. It no longer requires God as creator or designer (Mayr 2001, p. 138). Mayr adds that “eliminating God from science made room for strictly scientific explanations of all natural phenomena” (Mayr 2001, p. 138). Furthermore, Mayr concludes, the “truly outstanding achievement” of Darwinism is that his theory “makes unnecessary the invocation of ‘final causes’—that is, any teleological forces” (Mayr 2001, p. 136). This claim is common. Evolutionary biologist of Brandt University Dr Gary Huxley wrote “Evolution is a fact and no educated scientist doubts it” (quoted in McDorman, 2011, p. 1). Yet, in spite of these claims, I was able to with little difficulty assemble a list of almost 3,000 scientists and professors who reject Darwinism as defined as variation caused by mutations plus natural selection ultimately accounts for all life forms, most of whom hold a Ph.D. degree in some field of science. This is but a small percentage of the estimated 113,000 Darwin Skeptic scientists and academics in the 1 United States alone, accordingly to a Harvard researcher (Gross and Simmons, 2006). Yet, Mayr admitted evolution is an historical, not an empirical science: Evolutionary biology, in contrast with physics and chemistry, is a historical science—the evolutionist attempts to explain events and processes that have already taken place. Laws and experiments are inappropriate techniques for the explication of such events and processes. Instead one constructs a historical narrative, consisting of a tentative reconstruction of the particular scenario that led to the events one is trying to explain (2001, p. 135). Given his acknowledgement of this fact, it is all the more surprising that Mayr would be so dogmatic as to insist upon the unquestionable, unequivocal validity of Darwinism. Joseph McInerney, the director of Biological Sciences Curriculum Study, which publishes the textbook Biological Science: An Ecological Approach, wrote that creationists maintain that ‘scientists disagree about evolution.’ That is a deliberate misrepresentation of biology. In fact, all scientists accept the reality of evolution” (quoted in Hill, 1996, pp. 5,7, emphasis added). This erroneous view has been widely promoted and accepted at least since 1922 when Professor George Duncan claimed that Evolution is well-nigh universally accepted by all scientific men as the best explanation for the facts of life. The American Association for the Advance of Science with over 1400 members, comprising most of the scientific men of the United States and Canada, affirmed, in December, 1922, without a dissenting vote, the following: “No scientific generalization is more strongly supported by thoroughly tested evidences than is that of evolution. The evidences for the evolution of man are sufficient to convince every scientist of note in the world.” ...H.F. Osborn of Columbia University writes: “Evolution has long since passed out of the domain of speculation, of hypothesis, and even of theory. It is a law of living nature as firmly and incontrovertibly established as the law of gravitation in respect to the celestial spheres” (Duncan, 1931, pp. 31-32). Others acknowledge that some Darwin Skeptic scientists exist, but conclude that the number is very small. For example, Samuel Kounaves argues evolutionary naturalists include “99.9999 percent of the scientific community” (Kounaves 2005, p. 1). The sources for the members of this list include primarily persons of my acquaintance, from their involvement in creationist or Darwin Doubter organizations, or books that they have written. The list is very incomplete, and I apologize for the many omissions. I estimate that, if I had the time and resources, I could easily complete a list of over 10,000 names. I am also a member of three discussion groups involving over to 400 creationists and Intelligent Design (ID) advocates, many of whom are not included in this list because of their justifiable concern that revealing their sympathies in this area could adversely impact their careers. I did not add names unless the person was out-of-the-closet or gave his or her permission. On my public list, I have close to 3,000 names, including about a dozen Nobel Prize winners but, unfortunately, a large number of persons that could be added to the public list, including many college professors, did not want their name listed because of real concerns over possible retaliation or harm to their careers. Many of those who did not want their names on this list are young academics without tenure, or academics who are concerned that “outing” them could seriously damage their career. This is a valid concern. For this reason I have a private list with well over a 1,000 names. Many on this list are secure tenured professors, teach at Christian Universities that protect their academic freedom to criticize Darwinism, or are in industry, or in a medical field where less antagonism exists when it comes to questioning Darwin. Some on this list are now involved full time in speaking and writing on origins, and no longer depend on secular employment to put bread on the family table. Many are also retired, thus no longer face retaliation for their doubts about Darwin. Some consented to include their names only if their current employment was not listed. This is an ongoing project and I greatly appreciate the contributions of the many persons who have helped me in this now six year long effort. I contacted 2 most of those on this list but, if they have published books or articles that clearly express doubts about Darwinism, or were active in various creation or ID movements, I did not always contact them. Most of the following worldwide scientists and educators (by the time this list was published some may be deceased) all reject “Darwinism” according to the following definition: The belief that evolution and common decent can account for the existence of all life. A few accept common decent but reject the Darwinisn mechanism. Most all persons on this list are also skeptical of the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Furthermore, all stressed that careful examination of the evidence for Darwinism should be encouraged. This list proves Mayr’s claim that “no educated person any longer questions the validity” of Darwinism, as Mayr defines it, to be not only false, but grossly irresponsible. Furthermore, many of these scientists and academics have published in the scientific literature, some extensively. In one survey, Elliott (1990) concluded that approximately half of the current Creation Research Society Board members have published research that was cited by other scientists. Thus “it seems reasonable to conclude that most CRS Board members are serious, if not notable, scientists.” References Anonymous. 2006. “A Scientific Dissent from Darwinism.” www.dissentfromdarwin.com, February. ______. 2006. “Over 5000 Scientists Proclaim their Doubts about Darwin’s Theory, Scientific Dissent from Darwinism Continues to Grow, Say Experts.” Available on www.dissentfromdarwin.com.
Recommended publications
  • U.S. PODCAST REPORT TOP 100 PODCASTS by DOWNLOADS Podcasts Ranked by Average Weekly Downloads in the United States Reporting Period: March 16 - April 12, 2020
    U.S. PODCAST REPORT TOP 100 PODCASTS BY DOWNLOADS Podcasts Ranked by Average Weekly Downloads in the United States Reporting Period: March 16 - April 12, 2020 # OF NEW RANK PODCAST PODCAST NETWORK SALES REPRESENTATION EPISODES CHANGE 1 NPR News Now NPR National Public Media 672 0 2 Up First NPR National Public Media 30 h2 3 The Ben Shapiro Show Cumulus Media/Westwood One Cumulus Media/Westwood One 22 0 4 My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff Stitcher Midroll 9 i2 and Georgia Hardstark 5 Planet Money NPR National Public Media 11 h3 6 NPR Politics NPR National Public Media 21 h1 7 Fresh Air NPR National Public Media 24 i1 8 Pod Save America RADIO.COM/Cadence13 Cadence 13 8 h1 9 Dateline NBC NBC News Wondery Brand Partnerships 13 i4 10 Indicator from Planet Money NPR National Public Media 20 h3 11 Hidden Brain NPR National Public Media 4 i1 12 Fox News Radio Newscast FOX News Podcasts FOX News Podcasts 672 h4 13 TED Radio Hour NPR National Public Media 5 h1 14 Office Ladies Stitcher Midroll 4 i3 15 How I Built This NPR National Public Media 6 0 16 Wait Wait... Don't Tell Me! NPR National Public Media 5 h5 17 The Dan Bongino Show Cumulus Media/Westwood One Cumulus Media/Westwood One 21 i5 18 Freakonomics Radio Stitcher Midroll 5 h1 19 The Rachel Maddow Show NBC News Wondery Brand Partnerships 21 h1 20 Unlocking Us with Brené Brown RADIO.COM/Cadence13 Cadence13 7 New 21 Conan O’Brien Needs A Friend Stitcher Midroll 4 i3 22 Oprah’s SuperSoul Conversations Stitcher Midroll 4 i5 23 VIEWS with David Dobrik and Jason RADIO.COM/Cadence13 Cadence13
    [Show full text]
  • Kelly Mckeague
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNTIL RELEASED BY THE COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND REFORM STATEMENT FOR THE RECORD OF MR. KELLY MCKEAGUE DIRECTOR, DEFENSE POW/MIA ACCOUNTING AGENCY BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON NATIONAL SECURITY COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND REFORM U.S HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES October 29, 2019 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNTIL RELEASED BY THE COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND REFORM INTRODUCTION Mr. Chairman, Ranking Member Hice, and distinguished members of the Subcommittee, it is a privilege to appear before you today. As provided in Section 916 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (NDAA for FY 2015), then Secretary of Defense Hagel established the Defense POW/MIA Accounting Agency (DPAA) in 2015 as the single organization within the Department of Defense (DoD) responsible for policy, control, and oversight of the program to resolve missing person cases; to account for missing persons from past conflicts, including locating, recovering, and identifying the remains of the missing; dissemination of appropriate information regarding these efforts to family members; and establishment of a means for communications between DPAA and the family members, veterans service organizations (VSO), concerned citizens, and the public on the Department’s past conflict accounting efforts. DPAA was established by merging the Defense POW/Missing Personnel Office, the Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command, and past conflict elements of the Air Force’s Life Sciences Equipment Laboratory. The agency’s overarching mission is to harness resources, research, and conduct operations to maximize the number of DoD personnel missing from past conflicts accounted for annually, while ensuring timely and accurate information is provided to their families and the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Clark, Harold Willard (1891–1986)
    Clark, Harold Willard (1891–1986) JAMES L. HAYWARD James L. Hayward, Ph.D. (Washington State University), is a professor emeritus of biology at Andrews University where he taught for 30 years. He is widely published in literature dealing with ornithology, behavioral ecology, and paleontology, and has contributed numerous articles to Adventist publications. His book, The Creation-Evolution Controversy: An Annotated Bibliography (Scarecrow Press, 1998), won a Choice award from the American Library Association. He also edited Creation Reconsidered (Association of Adventist Forums, 2000). Harold Willard Clark was an Adventist biologist who taught for many years at Pacific Union College. He became well known among Seventh-day Adventists through his writings that defended young-earth creationism and Flood geology. Early Life and Education Harold Willard Clark Harold W. Clark was born near Sherbrooke, Quebec, Photo from Wikimedia Commons. Canada, on November 6, 1891, the eldest of four siblings. Until Harold was six his parents, Homer and Sarah (nee Gladden) Clark, managed a farm near Sherbrooke. Eventually the family moved to a second farm near South Corinth, Vermont, where Harold spent most of his childhood and adolescence. There he learned to tend livestock, plant and harvest corn and potatoes, put up hay, care for a family garden, and make maple syrup. He also developed a love for nature, in part by reading through a botany textbook by Harvard professor Asa Gray. During the spring and summer of his sixteenth year he enjoyed learning the names of local wild plants, a passion that would occupy the rest of his life.1 Career in Education At sixteen Harold passed Vermont’s teachers’ examinations, and was certified to teach elementary school, which he did for the next year and a half.
    [Show full text]
  • Darwin Skeptics a Select List of Science Academics, Scientists, and Scholars Who Are Skeptical of Darwinism Compiled by Jerry Bergman Phd
    Darwin Skeptics A Select List of Science Academics, Scientists, and Scholars Who are Skeptical of Darwinism Compiled by Jerry Bergman PhD. http://www.rae.org/pdf/darwinskeptics.pdf , 24-8-2014 It is commonly claimed that no scientist rejects macroevolution or Darwinism (by which is meant evolutionary naturalism, or the view that variation caused by mutations plus natural selection accounts for all life forms). For example, Dr. Steve Jones, Professor of Genetics at University College of London, wrote that “no scientist denies the central truth of The Origin, the idea of descent with modification... plants, animals and everything else descended from a common ancestor” (Jones, 2000, pp. xvii, xxiii). Other writers avoid the words “all” or “no scientist” and claim instead that “almost no scientist” rejects Darwinism as defined above. In an article refuting “wiccan creationism,” the author claimed that evolutionary theory has been confirmed to such a high degree and has such great explanatory power that it is the central organizing principle of the biological sciences today. Modern biology is basically unthinkable outside of the context of evolution and that is why it is accepted without reservations by pretty much every working scientists [sic] in the life sciences. It also isn’t really questioned in the other natural sciences, either, like physics or chemistry. The author then makes the following absolutist statement: Evolution is taken as a fact—and while there might be disagreements about some of the details of how evolution proceeds, there are no disagreements about the idea that it does occur and that it is the explanation for the diversity of life on our planet.
    [Show full text]
  • Academic Genealogy of the Oakland University Department Of
    Basilios Bessarion Mystras 1436 Guarino da Verona Johannes Argyropoulos 1408 Università di Padova 1444 Academic Genealogy of the Oakland University Vittorino da Feltre Marsilio Ficino Cristoforo Landino Università di Padova 1416 Università di Firenze 1462 Theodoros Gazes Ognibene (Omnibonus Leonicenus) Bonisoli da Lonigo Angelo Poliziano Florens Florentius Radwyn Radewyns Geert Gerardus Magnus Groote Università di Mantova 1433 Università di Mantova Università di Firenze 1477 Constantinople 1433 DepartmentThe Mathematics Genealogy Project of is a serviceMathematics of North Dakota State University and and the American Statistics Mathematical Society. Demetrios Chalcocondyles http://www.mathgenealogy.org/ Heinrich von Langenstein Gaetano da Thiene Sigismondo Polcastro Leo Outers Moses Perez Scipione Fortiguerra Rudolf Agricola Thomas von Kempen à Kempis Jacob ben Jehiel Loans Accademia Romana 1452 Université de Paris 1363, 1375 Université Catholique de Louvain 1485 Università di Firenze 1493 Università degli Studi di Ferrara 1478 Mystras 1452 Jan Standonck Johann (Johannes Kapnion) Reuchlin Johannes von Gmunden Nicoletto Vernia Pietro Roccabonella Pelope Maarten (Martinus Dorpius) van Dorp Jean Tagault François Dubois Janus Lascaris Girolamo (Hieronymus Aleander) Aleandro Matthaeus Adrianus Alexander Hegius Johannes Stöffler Collège Sainte-Barbe 1474 Universität Basel 1477 Universität Wien 1406 Università di Padova Università di Padova Université Catholique de Louvain 1504, 1515 Université de Paris 1516 Università di Padova 1472 Università
    [Show full text]
  • Program of the Sessions San Diego, California, January 9–12, 2013
    Program of the Sessions San Diego, California, January 9–12, 2013 AMS Short Course on Random Matrices, Part Monday, January 7 I MAA Short Course on Conceptual Climate Models, Part I 9:00 AM –3:45PM Room 4, Upper Level, San Diego Convention Center 8:30 AM –5:30PM Room 5B, Upper Level, San Diego Convention Center Organizer: Van Vu,YaleUniversity Organizers: Esther Widiasih,University of Arizona 8:00AM Registration outside Room 5A, SDCC Mary Lou Zeeman,Bowdoin upper level. College 9:00AM Random Matrices: The Universality James Walsh, Oberlin (5) phenomenon for Wigner ensemble. College Preliminary report. 7:30AM Registration outside Room 5A, SDCC Terence Tao, University of California Los upper level. Angles 8:30AM Zero-dimensional energy balance models. 10:45AM Universality of random matrices and (1) Hans Kaper, Georgetown University (6) Dyson Brownian Motion. Preliminary 10:30AM Hands-on Session: Dynamics of energy report. (2) balance models, I. Laszlo Erdos, LMU, Munich Anna Barry*, Institute for Math and Its Applications, and Samantha 2:30PM Free probability and Random matrices. Oestreicher*, University of Minnesota (7) Preliminary report. Alice Guionnet, Massachusetts Institute 2:00PM One-dimensional energy balance models. of Technology (3) Hans Kaper, Georgetown University 4:00PM Hands-on Session: Dynamics of energy NSF-EHR Grant Proposal Writing Workshop (4) balance models, II. Anna Barry*, Institute for Math and Its Applications, and Samantha 3:00 PM –6:00PM Marina Ballroom Oestreicher*, University of Minnesota F, 3rd Floor, Marriott The time limit for each AMS contributed paper in the sessions meeting will be found in Volume 34, Issue 1 of Abstracts is ten minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Burdick, Clifford Leslie (1894–1992)
    Burdick, Clifford Leslie (1894–1992) JAMES L. HAYWARD James L. Hayward, Ph.D. (Washington State University), is a professor emeritus of biology at Andrews University where he taught for 30 years. He is widely published in literature dealing with ornithology, behavioral ecology, and paleontology, and has contributed numerous articles to Adventist publications. His book, The Creation-Evolution Controversy: An Annotated Bibliography (Scarecrow Press, 1998), won a Choice award from the American Library Association. He also edited Creation Reconsidered (Association of Adventist Forums, 2000). Clifford Leslie Burdick, a Seventh-day Adventist consulting geologist, was an outspoken defender of young earth creationism and involved in the search for Noah’s Ark. Many of his claims were sensationalist and later discredited. Early Life and Education Born in 1894, Burdick was a graduate of the Seventh Day Baptist Milton College of Wisconsin. After accepting the Seventh-day Adventist message, Burdick enrolled at Emmanuel Missionary College (EMC, now Andrews University) in hopes of becoming a missionary. There he met the prominent creationist George McCready Price who inspired Burdick’s Clifford Leslie Burdick. interest in “Flood geology.”1 From Youth's Instructor, July 11, 1967 In 1922 Burdick submitted a thesis to EMC entitled “The Sabbath: Its Development in America,” which he later claimed earned him a Master of Arts degree in theology. Records show, however, that he never received a degree at EMC. He also claimed to have received a master’s degree in geology from the University of Wisconsin. Although he did complete several courses in geology there, he failed his oral exams and thus was denied a degree.2 During the 1950s Burdick took courses in geology and paleontology at the University of Arizona with plans to earn a PhD.
    [Show full text]
  • Katalog, a – Adventbewegung
    A - Adventbewegung A 000 Adventbewegung A 100 Adventbewegung allgemein A 110 Adventbewegung in Nordamerika A 120 Adventbewegung in Deutschland A 200 Geschichten und Personen A 300 Glauben und Leben der Siebenten-Tags-Adventisten A 310 Gemeindewachstum/Mission A 400 Bücher von Ellen G. White A 500 Bücher über Ellen G. White A 100 - Adventbewegung Gerald Wheeler James White Wegbereiter und erster Leiter der Siebenten-Tags-Adventisten Etliches, was die Adventgemeinde heute kennzeichnet, geht auf seine Initiative zurück. Mit diesem Buch können wir seine Person besser verstehen lernen. Wolfgang Hartlapp Grundriss der Adventgeschichte Alles Wichtige kurz und prägnant – von der Wiederkunftserwartung in den ersten Jahrhunderten nach Christi bis zirka 1950. Inclusive Geschichte der Sabbat-Schule (=Bibelbetrachtung). Zudem Einordnung der Werke Ellen White’s. Angehängt sind eine Zeittafel von Augustinus bis in die 1960er Jahre, statistisches über die Adventbewegung sowie einer Karte zur Ausbreitung der Millerbewegung und Sabbat-Adventisten in den USA. Fernkurs für Diener am Wort – Theologisches Seminar Friedensau 1990, ca. 100 Seiten George R. Knight In Erwartung seines Kommens – Eine Kurzgeschichte der Siebenten-Tags-Adventisten Die Enttäusschung der wartenden Christen 1844 war nicht das Ende, sondern der Anfang einer weltweiten Bewegung. Der Autor, ein führender, mutiger adventistischer Kirchengeschichtler, beschreibt knapp und spannend sieben Etappen, die zur Entstehung und Entwicklung der Adventgemeinde führten. Advent-Verlag Lüneburg, 1994. Erstausg. 1993 in den USA, 160 Seiten, mit Zeittafel, ISBN 3- 8150-1257-0 George R. Knight Es war nicht immer so – Die Entwicklung adventistischer Glaubensüberzeugungen Wie kamen die Adventisten zu den Glaubensüberzeugen, die sie heute vertreten? Wie haben sich die Lehrauffassungen im laufen der Jahre verändert? Er legt in wohltuender Offenheit die unterschiedlichen Strömungen innerhalb der Adventgeschichte dar und verdeutlicht, dass Adventgläubige nicht aufhören dürfen, Suchende und Lernende zu sein.
    [Show full text]
  • May 1, 1969 Vol. 146 No. 18 REVIEW and HERALD • GENERAL CHURCH PAPER of the SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTISTS
    May 1, 1969 Vol. 146 No. 18 REVIEW AND HERALD • GENERAL CHURCH PAPER OF THE SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTISTS "Before the mountains were brought forth, or ever thou hadst formed the earth and the world, even from everlasting to everlasting, thou art God." Psalm 90:2. Last-Day Events-1 The Great Day "The great day of the Lord is near, near and hastening fast" (Zeph. 1:14, R.S.V.) Is ENTURIES ago Zephaniah proclaimed a message identical to that which Seventh-day Adventists C have heralded to the world since 1844. Note the prophet's further somber and tragic pen picture concerning the times: "A day of wrath is that day, a day of distress and anguish, a day of ruin and Near devastation" (Zeph. 1:15, 16, RS.V.). Then he admon- ishes God's people to "come together and hold assembly, . seek the Lord, . seek righteousness, seek humility" (Zeph. 2:1-3, R.S.V.). And to those who respond to this invitation, Zepha- niah promises, "The Lord, your God, is in your midst, a warrior who gives victory; he will rejoice over you with gladness. At that time I will bring you home" (Zeph. By RALPH S. WATTS 3:17, 20, R.S.V.). (Italics supplied.) "His [Zephaniah's] prophecies of impending judgment upon Judah apply with equal force to the judgments that are to fall upon an impenitent world at the time of the second advent of Christ."—Prophets and Kings, p. 389. What a glorious time in which to live—the days pre- ceding "the great day of the Lord"! Never has knowledge reached such stupendous propor- tions as it has for this present generation—knowledge which, if rightly used, could help prepare the world for "the great day of the Lord." But it is a sobering reality that the press and other news media almost continually blare.
    [Show full text]
  • United States District Court Northern District Of
    Case 3:07-cv-06076-SI Document 1 Filed 12/03/2007 Page 1 of 24 1 DANIEL A. HOROWITZ State Bar No. 92400 Attorney at Law 2 P.O. Box 1547 3 Lafayette, California 94549 4 [email protected] 5 6 Attorney for Plaintiff 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 14 MICHAEL SAVAGE, 15 No. 16 3:07-cv-06076-JCS Plaintiff, 17 18 vs. 19 Council on American-Islamic 20 Relations, Inc. and Does 1-100 21 22 Defendants. _____________________________/ 23 24 25 COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES 26 27 28 Case 3:07-cv-06076-SI Document 1 Filed 12/03/2007 Page 2 of 24 1 FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION 2 (Copyright Infringement) 3 4 JURISDICTION 5 1. 6 Michael Savage is the radio show star of “The Michael Savage Show”. “Michael 7 Savage”. Michael Savage is the owner of copyright interests in his show, “The Michael 8 Savage Show” also known as “The Savage Nation”. Savage broadcasts and creates his 9 content in the Northern District of California with his radio station located in San 10 Francisco, California. The content infringed upon was created in this district and 11 broadcast from this district. This cause of action arises from federal statute. 12 2. 13 14 “The Savage Nation” is a nationally syndicated radio show that reaches over eight 15 million listeners per week. Related to that show is the website www.MichaelSavage.com 16 which receives 2.3 million page views per month. The radio show originates in San 17 Francisco, California.
    [Show full text]
  • 14M Paid in Hazing Death Settlement
    D C Questions? Call 1-800-Tribune Saturday, December 1, 2018 Breaking news at chicagotribune.com GEORGE H. W. BUSH 1924-2018 DAVID HUME KENNERLY/GETTY 2011 The 41st president Oversaw end of the Cold War, presided over 1st Gulf War By Michael Graczyk died. He was 94. president, Bush was the man with he had trouble articulating “the Asociated Press The World War II hero, who also the golden resume who rose through vision thing,” and he was haunted by presided during the collapse of the the political ranks: from congress- his decision to break a stern, solemn HOUSTON — George H.W. Bush, Soviet Union and the final months of man to U.N. ambassador, Republican vow he made to voters: “Read my a patrician New Englander whose the Cold War, died late Friday night Party chairman to envoy to China, lips. No new taxes.” presidency soared with the coalition at his Houston home, said family CIA director to two-term vice presi- He lost his bid for re-election to victory over Iraq in Kuwait, but then spokesman Jim McGrath. His wife of dent under the hugely popular Ron- Bill Clinton in a campaign in which plummeted in the throes of a weak more than 70 years, Barbara Bush, ald Reagan. The 1991 Gulf War businessman H. Ross Perot took economy that led voters to turn him died in April 2018. stoked his popularity. out of office after a single term, has The son of a senator and father of a But Bush would acknowledge that Turn to Bush, Page 2 $14M paid in Leaders sign hazing death revised settlement NAFTA NIU student’s family sued Pi North American Kappa Alpha entities; 2012 case deal still faces test involved criminal guilty pleas before Congress By Zeke Miller By Matthew ities hosted “Mom and and Catherine Lucey Walberg Dad’s Night” and posed as Associated Press Chicago Tribune the pledges’ “Greek” par- ANTONIO PEREZ/CHICAGO TRIBUNE ents.
    [Show full text]
  • Mayor Charter Revision Halted
    Volume 95 Number 51 | AUGUST 8-14, 2018 | MiamiTimesOnline.com | Ninety-Three Cents FLORIDA HOUSE, DISTRICT 109 McMINN V. BUSH Mayor Battle charter to end revision Aug. 28 halted Both candidates are ready to Miami Commission to take on issues in community discuss further Tuesday FELIPE RIVAS [email protected] K. BARRETT BILALI Miami Times Contributor he race for District 109 of the Florida Not knowing the answers to ques- House of Representatives is gearing tions such as the amount of money a up to be a battle between candidates’ strong mayor would be paid and how experience versus perseverance. much power he would have caused T Miami City Commissioners to table a Young, up-and-comer Cedric McMinn will fight vote, which would bring a strong may- or form of government to the city. I want to look at a former state Rep. James Bush III in the Florida When I look at Brownsville, primary election Aug. 28 to occupy the seat that Four of the commissioners formed a comprehensive job opportunity will be vacated by term-limited and current dis- Overtown, Allapattah, quorum Tuesday and voted at a special act. I want to give every able, trict leader, Cynthia A. Stafford, who has endorsed Wynwood, I see communities meeting to carry over their special capable person, who is willing McMinn to fill her seat. No Republican has that need experienced meeting to the following Tuesday. to work,“ access to a job mounted a challenge. leadership,“ someone who The commissioners had two agenda . it will decrease crimes District 109 includes a swath of northwest Mi- understands the pulse of the items on which to vote.
    [Show full text]