DOCSLIB.ORG

The Jovian Magnetosheath: Factors Influencing the Size, Shape, And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Jovian Magnetosheath: Factors Influencing the Size, Shape, And UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles The Jovian Magnetosheath: Factors Influencing the Size, Shape, and Mirror Mode Content and Distribution A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Geophysics and Space Physics by Steven Peter Joy 2010 The dissertation of Steven Peter Joy is approved. _________________________________ Richard A. Thorne _________________________________ Christopher T. Russell _________________________________ Raymond J. Walker _________________________________ Margaret G. Kivelson, Committee Chair University of California, Los Angeles 2010 ii To my wife, Ella, and our children, David and Danielle. They sacrificed much and often to allow me to complete this work. And to my father, a scientist who I respect tremendously and who has always been an inspiration to me. iii Table of Contents Chapter 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1 1.1. Outline................................................................................................................. 2 1.2. The Shape and Location of the Earth’s Bow Shock and Magnetopause ............ 2 1.3. The shape and location of the Jovian bow shock and magnetopause................. 5 1.4. Properties of the Near-Jupiter and Near-Earth Solar Wind ................................ 7 1.5. The Earth’s Magnetosheath ................................................................................ 7 1.6. Mirror Mode Theory and Observations .............................................................. 8 1.7. Data Sources ..................................................................................................... 13 Bibliography ................................................................................................................. 14 Chapter 2 Probabilistic Models of the Shape and Location of the Jovian Magnetosheath Boundaries ........................................................................................................................ 18 2.1. The Ogino-Walker MHD Simulation at Jupiter................................................ 21 2.2. Solar Wind Dynamic Pressure Effects on the Shape and Location of the Bow Shock and Magnetopause ............................................................................................. 22 2.3. IMF Effects on the Shape and Location of the Bow Shock and Magnetopause25 2.4. Jovian bow shock and magnetopause shape models......................................... 29 2.5. Most probable Jovian bow shock and magnetopause surfaces......................... 32 2.6. Comparisons to Previous Boundary Models..................................................... 38 2.7. Solar Cycle Variation of the Size and Shape of the Jovian Boundaries ........... 39 2.8. Summary of Results.......................................................................................... 41 Bibliography ................................................................................................................. 45 Chapter 3 The Solar Wind in the Vicinity of Earth and Jupiter........................................ 49 3.1. Model predictions of the near-Jupiter solar wind ............................................. 51 3.2. Solar Wind Data Sets........................................................................................ 53 3.3. Statistical Analysis of the Data near Jupiter’s Orbit......................................... 61 3.3.1 Near-Jupiter Solar Wind: Quiet vs. Disturbed.......................................... 66 3.3.2 Near-Jupiter Solar Wind: Solar Cycle Variations..................................... 67 3.4. The Lognormal Distribution Function.............................................................. 68 3.5. Near-Jupiter Solar Wind: Probability Density Distributions............................ 69 3.6. Statistical Analysis of the Data near Earth ....................................................... 73 3.7. Summary........................................................................................................... 79 Bibliography ................................................................................................................. 81 Chapter 4 Mirror Mode Structures in the Jovian Magnetosheath..................................... 84 4.1. Identification and Classification of Mirror Modes ........................................... 86 4.2. Analysis............................................................................................................. 88 4.2.1 Distribution relative to the bow shock and the magnetopause ................. 89 4.2.2 Local time distribution.............................................................................. 92 4.2.3 Background field and plasma conditions.................................................. 92 4.3. Summary of Observations................................................................................. 97 4.4. Discussion......................................................................................................... 98 iv 4.5. Conclusions..................................................................................................... 103 Bibliography ............................................................................................................... 106 Chapter 5 Mirror Mode Structures and Evolution: Case study of a mirror mode train observed in data acquired by the THEMIS spacecraft.................................................... 111 5.1. THEMIS Instrumentation and Data Sets ........................................................ 112 5.2. Mirror Mode Event Description...................................................................... 113 5.3. Plasma distribution functions of the mirror mode structures.......................... 124 5.3.1. Linear Growth Phase of Mirror Mode Development.............................. 124 5.3.2. Non-linear Saturation of Mirror Mode Growth ...................................... 125 5.3.3. Mirror Structure Decay........................................................................... 129 5.4. Particle Distribution Functions Observed by THEMIS-D when Quasi-Periodic Mirror Mode Structures are Present............................................................................ 130 5.5. Particle Distribution Functions Observed by THEMIS-C when Mirror Mode Peak Structures are Observed. .................................................................................... 132 5.6. Particle Distribution Functions Observed by THEMIS-A when Mirror Mode Dip Structures are Observed. ...................................................................................... 133 5.7. Discussion....................................................................................................... 134 Bibliography ............................................................................................................... 137 Chapter 6 Summary and Future Work............................................................................ 139 6.1. Future Work.................................................................................................... 145 Bibliography ............................................................................................................... 146 Appendix A: Identification of Jovian Boundary Crossing Times ................................. 147 Bibligography ............................................................................................................. 161 v List of Figures Figure 1.1 Observed magnetopause crossings and the distribution of stand-off distances (after Fairfield et al. , 1976; Fairfield , 1971).............................................................. 3 Figure 1.2 An illustration of the differences between the motions of the untrapped and trapped particles in a mirror geometry (after Kivelson and Southwood , 1996).......... 9 Figure 1.3 Velocity distribution function during mirror mode linear growth (after Southwood and Kivelson , 1993). .............................................................................. 10 Figure 1.4 Wire-frame representation of the magnetic field perturbation surfaces in a mirror mode structure (after Constantinescu , 2002)................................................. 12 Figure 2.1 Summary of the observations of Jupiter boundary crossings to date projected into the Jovian equatorial plane (after Joy et al., 2002)............................................ 20 Figure 2.2 Response of the Ogino-Walker Jupiter MHD simulation to changes in solar wind dynamic pressure in the absence of an IMF (after Walker et al ., 2005). ......... 23 Figure 2.3 Simulation response to the addition of a small southward or northward IMF at low dynamic pressure (after Walker et al ., 2005)..................................................... 26 Figure 2.4 Simulation response to the inclusion of an IMF with a small B Y component (after Walker et al ., 2005)......................................................................................... 28 Figure 2.5 Contours of the flow diversion criterion used to identify the magnetopause in the MHD simulation (after Joy et al ., 2002)............................................................. 30 Figure 2.6 Bow shock (left) and magnetopause (right) surfaces generated by evaluating equation (2) at the 10 th , 50 th , and 90 th percentiles of the observed solar wind dynamic pressure in the three principal planes (rows, after Joy et al ., 2002).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Jjmonl 1603.Pmd
    alactic Observer GJohn J. McCarthy Observatory Volume 9, No. 3 March 2016 GRAIL - On the Trail of the Moon's Missing Mass GRAIL (Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory) was a NASA scientific mission in 2011/12 to map the surface of the moon and collect data on gravitational anomalies. The image here is an artist's impres- sion of the twin satellites (Ebb and Flow) orbiting in tandem above a gravitational image of the moon. See inside, page 4 for information on gravitational anomalies (mascons) or visit http://solarsystem. nasa.gov/grail. The John J. McCarthy Observatory Galactic Observer New Milford High School Editorial Committee 388 Danbury Road Managing Editor New Milford, CT 06776 Bill Cloutier Phone/Voice: (860) 210-4117 Production & Design Phone/Fax: (860) 354-1595 www.mccarthyobservatory.org Allan Ostergren Website Development JJMO Staff Marc Polansky It is through their efforts that the McCarthy Observatory Technical Support has established itself as a significant educational and Bob Lambert recreational resource within the western Connecticut Dr. Parker Moreland community. Steve Barone Jim Johnstone Colin Campbell Carly KleinStern Dennis Cartolano Bob Lambert Mike Chiarella Roger Moore Route Jeff Chodak Parker Moreland, PhD Bill Cloutier Allan Ostergren Cecilia Dietrich Marc Polansky Dirk Feather Joe Privitera Randy Fender Monty Robson Randy Finden Don Ross John Gebauer Gene Schilling Elaine Green Katie Shusdock Tina Hartzell Paul Woodell Tom Heydenburg Amy Ziffer In This Issue "OUT THE WINDOW ON YOUR LEFT" ............................... 4 SUNRISE AND SUNSET ...................................................... 13 MARE HUMBOLDTIANIUM AND THE NORTHEAST LIMB ......... 5 JUPITER AND ITS MOONS ................................................. 13 ONE YEAR IN SPACE ....................................................... 6 TRANSIT OF JUPITER'S RED SPOT ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Apollo Over the Moon: a View from Orbit (Nasa Sp-362)
    chl APOLLO OVER THE MOON: A VIEW FROM ORBIT (NASA SP-362) Chapter 1 - Introduction Harold Masursky, Farouk El-Baz, Frederick J. Doyle, and Leon J. Kosofsky [For a high resolution picture- click here] Objectives [1] Photography of the lunar surface was considered an important goal of the Apollo program by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The important objectives of Apollo photography were (1) to gather data pertaining to the topography and specific landmarks along the approach paths to the early Apollo landing sites; (2) to obtain high-resolution photographs of the landing sites and surrounding areas to plan lunar surface exploration, and to provide a basis for extrapolating the concentrated observations at the landing sites to nearby areas; and (3) to obtain photographs suitable for regional studies of the lunar geologic environment and the processes that act upon it. Through study of the photographs and all other arrays of information gathered by the Apollo and earlier lunar programs, we may develop an understanding of the evolution of the lunar crust. In this introductory chapter we describe how the Apollo photographic systems were selected and used; how the photographic mission plans were formulated and conducted; how part of the great mass of data is being analyzed and published; and, finally, we describe some of the scientific results. Historically most lunar atlases have used photointerpretive techniques to discuss the possible origins of the Moon's crust and its surface features. The ideas presented in this volume also rely on photointerpretation. However, many ideas are substantiated or expanded by information obtained from the huge arrays of supporting data gathered by Earth-based and orbital sensors, from experiments deployed on the lunar surface, and from studies made of the returned samples.
    [Show full text]
  • Deep Space Chronicle Deep Space Chronicle: a Chronology of Deep Space and Planetary Probes, 1958–2000 | Asifa
    dsc_cover (Converted)-1 8/6/02 10:33 AM Page 1 Deep Space Chronicle Deep Space Chronicle: A Chronology ofDeep Space and Planetary Probes, 1958–2000 |Asif A.Siddiqi National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA SP-2002-4524 A Chronology of Deep Space and Planetary Probes 1958–2000 Asif A. Siddiqi NASA SP-2002-4524 Monographs in Aerospace History Number 24 dsc_cover (Converted)-1 8/6/02 10:33 AM Page 2 Cover photo: A montage of planetary images taken by Mariner 10, the Mars Global Surveyor Orbiter, Voyager 1, and Voyager 2, all managed by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California. Included (from top to bottom) are images of Mercury, Venus, Earth (and Moon), Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune. The inner planets (Mercury, Venus, Earth and its Moon, and Mars) and the outer planets (Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune) are roughly to scale to each other. NASA SP-2002-4524 Deep Space Chronicle A Chronology of Deep Space and Planetary Probes 1958–2000 ASIF A. SIDDIQI Monographs in Aerospace History Number 24 June 2002 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Office of External Relations NASA History Office Washington, DC 20546-0001 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Siddiqi, Asif A., 1966­ Deep space chronicle: a chronology of deep space and planetary probes, 1958-2000 / by Asif A. Siddiqi. p.cm. – (Monographs in aerospace history; no. 24) (NASA SP; 2002-4524) Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Space flight—History—20th century. I. Title. II. Series. III. NASA SP; 4524 TL 790.S53 2002 629.4’1’0904—dc21 2001044012 Table of Contents Foreword by Roger D.
    [Show full text]
  • Mission Overview the Pioneer Mission Set the Stage for U.S. Space
    Mission Overview The Pioneer mission set the stage for U.S. space exploration. Pioneer 1 was the first manmade object to escape the Earth's gravitational field. Later Pioneer 4 was the first spacecraft to fly to the moon, Pioneer 10 was the first to Jupiter, Pioneer 11 was the first to Saturn and Pioneer 12 was the first U.S. spacecraft to orbit another planet, Venus. The following table summarizes the Pioneer spacecraft and scientific objectives of the Pioneer mission. Name Launch Mission Status (as of 1998) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Pioneer 1 1958-10-11 Moon Reached altitude of 72765 miles Pioneer 2 1958-11-08 Moon Reached altitude of 963 miles Pioneer 3 1958-12-02 Moon Reached altitude of 63580 miles Pioneer 4 1959-03-03 Moon Passed by moon into solar orbit Pioneer 5 1960-03-11 Solar Orbit Entered solar orbit Pioneer 6 1965-12-16 Solar Orbit Still operating Pioneer 7 1966-08-17 Solar Orbit Still operating Pioneer 8 1967-12-13 Solar Orbit Still operating Pioneer 9 1967-11-08 Solar Orbit Signal lost in 1983 Pioneer E 1969-08-07 Solar Orbit Launch failure Pioneer10 1972-03-02 Jupiter Communication terminated 1998 Pioneer11 1972-03-02 Jupiter/Saturn Communication terminated 1997 Pioneer12 1978-05-20 Venus Entered Venus atmos. 1992-10-08 The focus of this document is on Pioneer Venus (12), the last spacecraft in a mission of firsts in space exploration. Probe Separation: Pioneer Venus separated into two spacecraft on Aug 8, 1978: an Orbiter (PVO) and a Multiprobe. The latter was separated into five separate vehicles near Venus.
    [Show full text]
  • Deep Space Navigation: the Apollo VIII Mission
    F EATURE Deep Space Navigation: The Apollo VIII Mission by Paul Ceruzzi things. I remember that one of the Missile Division. For a mission like things that I was concerned with at the Apollo, inertial navigation had several In December 1968 the Apollo VIII time was whether our navigation was challenges. The first is that gyroscopes, mission took three astronauts from the sufficiently accurate, that we could, in which are at the heart of an inertial sys- Earth to an orbit around the Moon and fact, devise a trajectory that would get tem, tend to drift and give erroneous read- back again, safely. It was the first mission us around the Moon at the right dis- ings. The second is that the system needs to carry human beings far enough away tance without, say, hitting the Moon to account for the acceleration of gravity, from the Earth to be influenced primarily on the back side or something like which cannot be distinguished from the by the gravitational field of another heav- that, and if we lost communication accelerations due to a rocket’s thrust or enly body. That mission also marked a with Earth, for whatever reason, could any other accelerating force. number of other famous milestones: the we navigate by ourselves using celes- The drift problem, though serious, first human crew lofted by the Saturn V tial navigation. We thought we could, was manageable for intercontinental bal- booster, the Christmas Eve reading from but these were undemonstrated listic missiles (ICBM), whose rocket the Bible book of Genesis, and the skills.1 motors burn only for a few minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA Deep Space Network
    NASA Deep Space Network https://spaceodyssey.dmns.org/media/53989/deep_space_network.ppt Deep Space Network The Challenge: Pioneer 10 Tracking and Communicating with Spacecraft beyond Earth Orbit : •Lunar Exploration •Planetary Exploration •Interplanetary Exploration •Astronomical Exploration NASA Deep Space Network Three complexes, approximately 120°apart: --Goldstone --Madrid --Canberra Functions: • Receipt of Telemetry • Spacecraft Command • Radiometric Tracking – of spacecraft • Very Long Baseline Interferometry – determine location of radio sources • Radio Science – determine transmission characteristics between ground and spacecraft • Monitor and Control of real-time data • Science such as radio astronomy (on space- available basis) NASA Deep Space Network Operational Concept Signals to/from Spacecraft are Line of Sight Coverage of DSN Stations overlap beyond 30,000km (18.000 miles), providing 8-14 hours of daily view. This ensures reliable and useable two station coverage for lunar and deep space coverage for “uplinks” (transmission) to spacecraft and “downlinks” (receive data) from spacecraft. NASA Deep Space Network Canberra Ground Station Complex One of three space communications complexes making up DSN --multiple steerable antennae --remote locations protected by terrain from radio interference and away from population centers. Each complex consists of ultrasensitive receiving and processing systems which include, as a minimum , the following dish antennas: • One 34-meter (111-foot) diameter High Efficiency antenna. • One 34-meter Beam Waveguide antenna. • One 26-meter (85-foot) antenna. • One 70-meter (230-foot) antenna. NASA Deep Space Network Goldstone Ground Station Complex Madrid Ground Station Complex NASA Deep Space Network Details of DSN Facilities DSN Network also includes: • The Demonstration Test Facility at Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) where spacecraft-to-DSN compatibility is demonstrated and tested prior to launch.
    [Show full text]
  • Cooperation Or Competition?
    Exploring the Universe: Cooperation or Competition? European Forum Alpbach 2013 Shuang-Nan Zhang Director, Center for Particle Astrophysics Institute of High Energy Physics Chief Scientist, Space Science Division National Astronomical Observatories Chinese Academy of Sciences 1 Day 1 2 Ways of learning Write down one thing you think you are good at doing Write down how you learnt of doing this Choose and write down one of these answers: (1) From lecturing in classroom (2) By yourself: reading, asking, discussion, practicing (3) Other 3 Importance of asking and discussion The greatest scholar and teacher in Chinese history, Confucius (孔夫子), told us: “Among every three people, there must be someone who know more than me (三人一 行，必有我师)” The Nobel Laureate C.N. Yang (杨振宁) once said “Most of my knowledge comes from asking and discussing with my fellow students”. In Chinese, an intellectual is called “a person learning by asking (有学问的人)” 4 Nobel Laureate C.N. Yang (杨振宁) and me C.N. Yang is the “person learning by asking (有学问的人)” 5 Albert Einstein (爱因斯坦) and me I am the “person learning by asking (有学问的人)” 6 Traditional and interactive teaching Traditional teaching: one directional delivery of information from the teacher to students (notebooks) Role of teacher: information delivery Success measured by rate of information delivered Interactive teaching: asking + discussion Role of teacher: stimulate and moderate the process Success measured by rate of information received Just like communications: it only matters how much is received at the receiver’s end! Barriers must be removed for efficient communications. 7 Interruptions are invited during these seminars You are invited to interrupt me during at any time Asking questions, making points and comments, and even challenging me.
    [Show full text]
  • The Race to the Moon
    The Race to the Moon Jonathan McDowell Yes, we really did go there... July 2009 imagery of Fra Mauro base from Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter. Sergey Korolev's Program At Podlipki, in the Moscow suburbs, Korolev's factory churns out rockets and satellites Sputnik Luna moon probes Vostok spaceships Mars and Venus probes Spy satellites America's answer: the captured Nazi rocket team led by Dr. Wernher von Braun, based in Huntsville, Alabama America's answer: naturalized US citizen Dr. Wernher von Braun, based in Huntsville, Alabama October 1942: First into space The A-4 (V-2) rocket reaches over 50 miles high – the first human artifact in space. This German missile, ancestor of the Scud and the Shuttle, was designed to hit London and was later mass- produced by concentration camp labor – but the general in charge said at its first launch: “Today the Space Age is born”. First Earth Satellite: Sputnik Oct 1957 First Living Being in Orbit: Laika, Nov 1957 First Probe to Solar orbit: Luna-1 Jan 1959 First Probe to hit Moon: Luna-2 Sep 1959 First intact return to Earth from orbit: Discoverer 13 Aug 1960 First human in space: Yuriy Gagarin in Vostok-1 Apr 1961 Is America losing the Space Race? Time to up the stakes dramatically.... “In this decade...” I believe that this nation should commit itself to achieving the goal, before this decade is out, of landing a man on the Moon and returning him safely to the Earth. John F Kennedy, address to Congress, May 25, 1961 1958-1961 MOON PROGRAM – USSR USA SEP 1958: E-1 No.
    [Show full text]
  • Calendar2010 with the Beginning of a New Year, Construction of the International Space Station Is Nearing Completion
    www.nasa.gov NP-2009-10-033-JSC National Aeronautics and Space Administration International Space Station calendar2010 With the beginning of a new year, construction of the International Space Station is nearing completion. As the largest and most complicated spacecraft ever built, this orbiting outpost can support a crew of six, operating 24 hours a day, seven days a week, 365 days a year. It is a shining example of international cooperation for the United States and its space exploration partners. A New Year of Exploration January 2010 SMTWTFS 1 2 3 4 1965 – Gemini VII 1973 – Pioneer 10. Flyby 1998 – STS-88 Unity of Jupiter. First yby of Connecting Module. First outer planet U.S. segment 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2001 – STS-108 1972 – Apollo 17. Final Expedition 4 Apollo mission 2006 – STS-116 P5 truss 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 1965 – Gemini VI-A and VII successfully rendezvous 1970 – Venera 7 (U.S.S.R.). First spacecraft to land on 1903 – Wright brothers another planet (Venus) rst ight Winter Solstice— Christmas Day 19 20 21 Winter begins 22 23 24 25 1968 – Apollo 8 becomes rst crewed mission to 1968 – Apollo 8 orbit the moon 26 27 28 29 30 31 SMTWTFS SMTWTFS 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 January 2011 st rd 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 New 1 Full 3 November 2010 5 13 21 28 28 29 30 25 26 27 28 29 For more information about the International Space Station please visit www.nasa.gov Neutral Buoyancy Lab Ascent Training Ground support for the International Space Station involves more than 100,000 people in space agencies, at 500 contractor facilities and in 37 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Launch and Results of Pioneer
    H UMAN F LIGHT &ROBOTIC E XPLORATION “Pioneering Space” Part II By Gideon Marcus research determined that 108 had experi- days for Earth and Moon to be in similar enced the same problem. This discovery did respective positions again. The launch win- An Unnumbered Pioneer not come as a complete surprise. Dolph dows were so narrow that mission planners Just six months after Louis Dunn Thiel, propulsions expert at Space had long since decided to not provide trajec- gave the order to start production, through Technology Laboratories and Peenemünde tory compensation for launch holds. dint of hard effort and ingenuity, the first veteran, had noted early that year that Instead, each Thor was preprogrammed Thor-Able three-stage booster towered 88 Thor’s turbopump design was thoroughly with a particular roll program, which varied feet above Launch Complex 17 pad A on marginal and recommended that the prob- depending on the launch day. The Air Force Merritt Island, Florida. The serial number, lem be fixed in the next run of the Thor mis- took for granted that the rocket would be 127, was printed on the Thor IRBM first sile. The problem was that several of the ready to fire at the proper time.2 stage, and USAF was proudly emblazoned potentially faulty Thors had already been Able-1’s first countdown went by along the Vanguard second stage. Atop the built and were committed for a variety of almost without a hitch. The Thor-Able third stage rested the world’s first lunar missions: several test flights, two more booster was fully fueled by the afternoon of probe.
    [Show full text]
  • Space 365: an App Connecting You – and Your Audience – to Space
    44th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2013) 2425.pdf SPACE 365: AN APP CONNECTING YOU – AND YOUR AUDIENCE – TO SPACE. S. H. Williams1, 1NASA Planetary Science Division (detail), NASA HQ, Mail Suite 3X54, 300 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20546, [email protected]; permanent address: Education Division, Smithsonian Institution, National Air and Space Museum, Washington, DC. Introduction: An app called “SPACE 365” has launch date and the arrangement of a personal appear- been created to help learners/educators of all descrip- ance by Nichell Nichols, who played Lt. Uhura in that tions keep track of Space exploration-related events, series. That linkage allowed for a significantly-higher along with other events, birthdays, etc. to provide so- level of media and public attention than the event cio-historical context. It allows the user to search the would have otherwise attracted. app database by year, date, keywords, subject catego- March 3, 2012: Less utilized was a co-incidence of ries, and other parameters; share with others, and even dates a year ago, associated with the 100th anniversary query the app SME. Many of the Space-related entries of the discovery of the Cepheid variable period- have an associated NASA image and one or more links luminosity relationship, still a fundamental astronomi- to external information sources. SPACE 365 is availa- cal “yardstick,” by one Henrietta Leavitt at Harvard ble at no cost, in both Android and Apple formats, College Observatory – a pioneering discovery by a from the usual sources. gender pioneer in a male-dominated field. March 3 Background: The need to enhance both formal and was also the 40th anniversary of the launch of the Pio- informal STEM education efforts is as great as it is neer 10 spacecraft, the first to reach Jupiter, and the well-documented.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA Is Not Archiving All Potentially Valuable Data
    ‘“L, United States General Acchunting Office \ Report to the Chairman, Committee on Science, Space and Technology, House of Representatives November 1990 SPACE OPERATIONS NASA Is Not Archiving All Potentially Valuable Data GAO/IMTEC-91-3 Information Management and Technology Division B-240427 November 2,199O The Honorable Robert A. Roe Chairman, Committee on Science, Space, and Technology House of Representatives Dear Mr. Chairman: On March 2, 1990, we reported on how well the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) managed, stored, and archived space science data from past missions. This present report, as agreed with your office, discusses other data management issues, including (1) whether NASA is archiving its most valuable data, and (2) the extent to which a mechanism exists for obtaining input from the scientific community on what types of space science data should be archived. As arranged with your office, unless you publicly announce the contents of this report earlier, we plan no further distribution until 30 days from the date of this letter. We will then give copies to appropriate congressional committees, the Administrator of NASA, and other interested parties upon request. This work was performed under the direction of Samuel W. Howlin, Director for Defense and Security Information Systems, who can be reached at (202) 275-4649. Other major contributors are listed in appendix IX. Sincerely yours, Ralph V. Carlone Assistant Comptroller General Executive Summary The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) is respon- Purpose sible for space exploration and for managing, archiving, and dissemi- nating space science data. Since 1958, NASA has spent billions on its space science programs and successfully launched over 260 scientific missions.
    [Show full text]