DOCSLIB.ORG

Nebraska's Big Ten History

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nebraska's Big Ten History 100 2017-18 NEBRASKA WOMEN'S BASKETBALL NEBRASKA'S BIG TEN HISTORY Although Nebraska competed for the first time as a member of the Big Ten Conference in 2011-12, the Huskers have a relatively substantial history playing against Big Ten opponents. Nebraska's first-ever meeting with a Big Ten school came with a thrilling 68-67 overtime victory over Minnesota on Dec. 30, 1977. Two weeks later, the Huskers improved to 2-0 against the Big Ten with a 71-63 victory over Iowa at the Jennies Classic in Warrensburg, Mo., on Jan. 13, 1978. The following season, Nebraska improved to 3-0 against the Big Ten with a narrow 59-57 victory over Minnesota at the Devaney Center on Nov. 28, 1978. Overall, the Huskers carry an 88-78 all-time record against Big Ten opposition after their first six seasons of Big Ten Conference competition. Nebraska is 64-49 against Big Ten foes in its first six seasons in the conference, including 56-44 in Big Ten regular-season play. The Huskers captured the 2014 Big Ten Tournament title by going 3-0 in Indianapolis. The Huskers are 8-5 all-time in the Big Ten Tournament and 6-3 at Bankers Life Fieldhouse in Indianapolis. The Huskers are 32-30 on the road in Big Ten play in their first six Big Ten seasons. Nebraska's Big Ten Series History vs. Illinois (Nebraska leads, 10-5) Lincoln: Nebraska leads, 5-1 (last, Nebraska 73, Illinois 57, Jan. 10, 2016) Champaign-Urbana: Nebraska leads, 4-2 (last, Illinois 79, Nebraska 70, March 1, 2017) Neutral: Illinois leads, 2-1 (last, Illinois 79, Nebraska 70, March 1, 2017) Last Meeting: Illinois 79, Nebraska 70, March 1, 2017 (Lincoln) First Meeting: Nebraska 89, Illinois 86, March 3, 1982 vs. Indiana (Nebraska leads, 5-4) Lincoln: Nebraska leads, 3-2 (last, Nebraska 67, Indiana 64, Feb. 19, 2017) Bloomington: Series tied, 2-2 (last, Indiana 59, Nebraska 47, Feb. 7, 2016) Neutral: None Last Meeting: Nebraska 67, Indiana 64, Feb. 19, 2017 (Lincoln) First Meeting: Indiana 83, Nebraska 80 (OT), Nov. 26, 1994 (Lincoln) vs. Iowa (Series tied, 12-12) Lincoln: Iowa leads, 5-4 (last, Iowa 74, Nebraska 68, Dec. 31, 2015) Iowa City: Series tied, 4-4 (last, Iowa 75, Nebraska 72, Dec. 31, 2016) Neutral: Nebraska leads, 5-2 (last, Iowa 74, Nebraska 65, March 6, 2015) Last Meeting: Iowa 75, Nebraska 72, Dec. 31, 2016 (Iowa City) Chelsea Aubry, a 2012 Canadian Olympian, led Nebraska with 18 points, four First Meeting: Nebraska 71, Iowa 63, Jan. 13, 1978 (Warrensburg, Mo.) rebounds and four assists in just 20 minutes in No. 25 Nebraska's 87-47 win over Michigan on Dec. 9, 2006. The Huskers are 11-3 all-time against the Wolverines, vs. Maryland (Maryland leads, 6-0) including a 118-92 win in the first meeting between the two schools on Nov. 28, Lincoln: Maryland leads, 3-0 (Maryland 93, Nebraska 49, Jan. 4, 2017) 1980 - the highest scoring game in Nebraska history. College Park: Maryland leads, 3-0 (Maryland 89, Nebraska 50, Jan. 7, 2016) Neutral: None Last Meeting: Maryland 93, Nebraska 49, Jan. 4, 2017 (Lincoln) vs. Ohio State (Ohio State leads, 8-7) First Meeting: Maryland 76, Nebraska 64, March 25, 2008 (College Park) Lincoln: Series tied, 3-3 (last, Ohio State 87, Nebraska 69, Feb. 16, 2017) Columbus: Ohio State leads, 5-3 (last, Ohio State 95, Nebraska 75, Jan. 29, 2017) vs. Michigan (Nebraska leads, 11-3) Neutral: Nebraska leads, 1-0 (last, Nebraska 71, Ohio State 57, March 3, 2012) Lincoln: Nebraska leads, 5-2 (last, Michigan 84, Nebraska 51, Jan. 22, 2017) Last Meeting: Ohio State 87, Nebraska 69, Feb. 16, 2017 (Columbus) Ann Arbor: Nebraska leads, 6-1 (last, Michigan 88, Nebraska 60, Feb. 23, 2017) First Meeting: Nebraska 63, Ohio State 54, Dec. 2, 1990 (Columbus) Neutral: None Last Meeting: Michigan 88, Nebraska 60, Feb. 23, 2017 (Ann Arbor) vs. Penn State (Penn State leads, 6-5) First Meeting: Nebraska 118, Michigan 92, Nov. 28, 1980 (Lincoln)* Lincoln: Nebraska leads, 3-2 (Nebraska 87, Penn State 69, Feb. 2, 2016) *highest scoring game in Nebraska history University Park: Penn State leads, 3-2 (last, Penn State 86, Nebraska 69, Jan. 19, 2017) Neutral: Penn State leads, 1-0 (last, Penn State 83, Nebraska 64, Dec. 30, 2002) vs. Michigan State (Nebraska leads, 6-3) Last Meeting: Penn State 83, Nebraska 69, Jan. 19, 2017 (Lincoln) Lincoln: Nebraska leads, 4-0 (Nebraska 76, Michigan State 74 OT, Feb. 26, 2017) First Meeting: Penn State 102, Nebraska 66, Jan. 2, 1993 (University Park) East Lansing: Michigan State leads, 3-1 (last, Michigan State 93, Nebraska 73, Jan. 7, 2017) Neutral: Nebraska leads, 1-0 (Nebraska 86, Michigan State 58, March 8, 2014) vs. Purdue (Purdue leads, 7-3) Last Meeting: Nebraska 76, Michigan State 74 OT, Feb. 26, 2017 (Lincoln) Lincoln: Purdue Leads 3-1 (last, Purdue 68, Nebraska 50, Feb. 21, 2016) First Meeting: Michigan State 73, Nebraska 53, Feb. 23, 2012 (East Lansing) West Lafayette: Series tied, 2-2 (last, Purdue 88, Nebraska 45, Jan. 26, 2017) Neutral: Purdue leads, 2-0 (last, Purdue 77, Nebraska 64, March 9, 2013) vs. Minnesota (Nebraska leads 11-9) Last Meeting: Purdue 88, Nebraska 45, Jan. 26, 2017 (West Lafayette) Lincoln: Nebraska leads, 9-3 (last, Minnesota 79, Nebraska 69 OT, Feb. 4, 2017) First Meeting: Nebraska 93, Purdue 89 (3OT), Feb. 2, 2012 (West Lafayette) Minneapolis: Minnesota leads, 6-1 (last, Minnesota 110, Nebraska 73, Feb. 11, 2016) Neutral: Nebraska leads, 1-0 (Nebraska 80, Minnesota 67, March 7, 2014) vs. Rutgers (Rutgers leads, 3-2) Last Meeting: Minnesota 79, Nebraska 69 OT, Feb. 4, 2017 (Lincoln) Lincoln: Nebraska leads 2-0 (Nebraska 62, Rutgers 58, Jan. 10, 2017) First Meeting: Nebraska 68, Minnesota 67 (OT), Dec. 30, 1977 (Lincoln) Piscataway: Rutgers leads, 2-0 (last, Rutgers 66, Nebraska 56, Jan. 30, 2016) Neutral: Rutgers leads, 1-0 (Rutgers 66, Nebraska 63, March 3, 2016) vs. Northwestern (Nebraska leads, 8-6) Last Meeting: Nebraska 62, Rutgers 58, Jan. 10, 2017 (Lincoln) Lincoln: Nebraska leads, 4-2 (last, Northwestern 62, Nebraska 58, Dec. 28, 2016) First Meeting: Rutgers 46, Nebraska 43, Feb. 5, 2015 (Piscataway) Evanston: Northwestern leads, 4-3 (last, Northwestern 85, Nebraska 62, Jan. 3, 2016) Neutral: Nebraska leads, 1-0 (last, Nebraska 88, Northwestern 56, March 1, 2012) vs. Wisconsin (Nebraska leads, 8-6) Last Meeting: Northwestern 62, Nebraska 58, Dec. 28, 2016 (Lincoln) Lincoln: Nebraska leads, 4-2 (last, Nebraska 70, Wisconsin 63, Feb. 15, 2015) First Meeting: Nebraska 65, Northwestern 64, Nov. 29, 1980 (Lincoln) Madison: Series tied, 4-4 (last, Wisconsin 82, Nebraska 56, Feb. 9, 2017) Neutral: None Last Meeting: Wisconsin 82, Nebraska 56, Feb. 9, 2017 (Madison) First Meeting: Wisconsin 79, Nebraska 74, Jan. 5, 1979 (Madison) INTRODUCTION . THIS IS NEBRASKA . ADMINISTRATION . COACHES . MEET THE HUSKERS . OPPONENTS . REVIEW . RECORDS . TRADITION.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Information Sheet: Extraterritorial Jurisdiction: a Summary
    Extraterritorial jurisdiction: A summary This document contains general information. It is not legal advice. Every situation is different and other laws might apply to your situation. If you have questions, contact an attorney, visit the Department of Labor and Industry website at www.dli.mn.gov/business/workers-compensation-businesses or call the workers’ compensation hotline at 800-342-5354 and press 3. Note: This information sheet is about coverage under the Minnesota Workers’ Compensation Act for: employees injured while performing duties outside of Minnesota; and employees who regularly work outside of Minnesota who are injured while performing duties in Minnesota for the same employer. It is not about workers’ compensation coverage under the laws of other states. Injuries occuring outside the state of Minnesota An employee who is injured outside the state of Minnesota is only covered under the Minnesota Workers’ Compensation Act if the Act’s requirements for “extraterritorial application” or “temporary out-of-state employment” are met. Extraterritorial application The requirements for “extraterritorial application” are in Minnesota Statutes, section 176.041, subdivision 2. Subd. 2. Extraterritorial application. If an employee who regularly performs the primary duties of employment within this state receives an injury while outside of this state in the employ of the same employer, the provisions of this chapter shall apply to such injury. If a resident of this state is transferred outside the territorial limits of the United States as an employee of a Minnesota employer, the resident shall be presumed to be temporarily employed outside of this state while so employed. Under this statute, Minnesota workers’ compensation benefits apply if any employee who “regularly performs” the “primary duties” of employment in Minnesota is injured while working for the same employer outside of Minnesota.
    [Show full text]
  • South Dakota Vs. Minnesota Trust Law Desk Reference Guide
    South Dakota vs. Minnesota Trust Law Desk Reference Guide Advantage South Dakota Minnesota For over 30 years, SD has been Like many states, MN has one of the best places to locate attempted to catch up to SD by a trust. A unique and active implementing the Uniform legislative trust committee, Trust Code. However, the Trust Location (Situs) favorable Legislature and difference is still clear and governor support continues to distinct, and the state does not rank SD as a top tier trust have the stability or support jurisdiction state; as verified by that SD enjoys from the industry leaders. government. In addition to many other taxes, MN taxes its trusts. In 2018, the There is no state personal, Fielding v. Commissioner of corporate, or fiduciary income Revenue decision highlighted tax, as well as no state tax on this major difference, holding State Taxes capital gains, dividends, that a trust set up as a MN trust interest, intangibles, or any may not need to stay a resident other income. This equates to trust for tax purposes for the NO state taxes on trust income. entire length of the trust (depending on circumstances). A Dynasty Trust has unlimited possibilities because there is no Rule Against Perpetuities MN has a Rule Against The Dynasty Trust - Legacy (abolished in 1983). Dynasty Perpetuities. By statute, all Trusts avoid federal estate and non-vested interests must vest Planning for Generations income taxation on trust assets (pass) 21 years after death of an because there is no forced asset individual or 90 years after its distribution and the bonus of creation.
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota Ag News – Milk Production
    United States Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service Minnesota Ag News – Milk Production Minnesota Field Office · 375 Jackson St, Ste 610 · St. Paul, MN 55107 (651) 728-3113 fax (855) 271-9802 · www.nass.usda.gov/mn Cooperating with the Minnesota Department of Agriculture November 18, 2020 Media Contact: Dan Lofthus Milk production in Minnesota during October 2020 totaled 846 million pounds, up 3% from the previous October according to the latest USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service – Milk Production report. The average number of milk cows during October, at 444,000 head, was the same as the previous month but down 3,000 from last year. Monthly production per cow averaged 1,905 pounds, up 60 pounds from last October. Milk Production Milk Production per Cow Minnesota: 2018-2020 Minnesota: 2018-2020 875 2,000 1,950 850 1,900 825 1,850 800 1,800 1,750 Million Million pounds 775 1,700 750 Pounds per head 1,650 725 1,600 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018 2019 2020 2018 2019 2020 Milk Cows and Production – Selected States: October 2019 and 2020 Milk Cows 1 Milk Per Cow 2 Milk Production 2 State Change 2019 2020 2019 2020 2019 2020 from 2019 (1,000 head) (1,000 head) (pounds) (pounds) (million pounds) (million pounds) (percent) Arizona ...................................... 197 196 1,985 1,965 391 385 -1.5 California ................................... 1,725 1,720 1,940 1,970 3,347 3,388 1.2 Colorado ..................................
    [Show full text]
  • Unionid Mollusks of the Missouri River on the Nebraska Border
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln US Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Department of Defense 1983 UNIONID MOLLUSKS OF THE MISSOURI RIVER ON THE NEBRASKA BORDER Ellet Hoke Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usarmyceomaha Part of the Civil and Environmental Engineering Commons Hoke, Ellet, "UNIONID MOLLUSKS OF THE MISSOURI RIVER ON THE NEBRASKA BORDER" (1983). US Army Corps of Engineers. 105. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usarmyceomaha/105 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Defense at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in US Army Corps of Engineers by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. .-- UNIONID MOLLUSKS OF THE MISSOURI RIVER ON THE NEBRASKA BORDER ELLET HOKE 3000 UNIVERSITY AVENUE, NO. 63 WEST DES MOINES, IOWA 50265, U.S.A. ABSTRACT The Missouri River, bordering Nebraska, has previously been reported to be uninhabitable for unionid mollusks. Studies conducted in the Missouri River and its backwaters, primarily during 1981 and 1982. revealed the presence of thirteen species and subspecies of unionid mollusks. The apparent absence of any extensive prior unionid work in the Missouri River may explain the discrepancy between this and previous literature. little has been written on the unionid fauna of the general understanding of the species present. The area Missouri River in general, and almost nothing on that portion selected for the survey extends from Santee, Nebraska to the of the river bordering Nebraska. Collections were reported confluence of the Platte and Missouri Rivers below Omaha during the nineteenth century from the Great Falls of the (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Omaha-Council Bluffs Area Nebraska-Iowa by ROBERT D
    Geology of the Omaha-Council Bluffs Area Nebraska-Iowa By ROBERT D. MILLER GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 472 Prepared as a part of a program of the Department of the Interior for the development of the Missouri River basin UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1964 STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director Miller, Robert David, 1922- Geology .of the Omaha-Council Bluffs area, Iowa. 'iV ashington, U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1964. iv, 70 p. illus., maps (3 col.) diagrs., tables. 30 em. (U.S. Geological Survey. Professional Paper 472) Part of illustrative matter fold. in pocket. Prepared as a part of a program of the Dept. of the Interior for the development of the Missouri River basin. Bibliography: p. 67-70. (Continued on next card) Miller, Robert David, 1922- Geology of the 0maha-Council Bluffs area, Nebraska-Iowa. 1964. (Card 2) 1. Geology-Nebraska-Omaha region. 2. Geology-Iowa-Council Bluffs region. I. Title: Omaha-Council Bluffs area, Nebraska-Iowa. (Series) For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract __________________________________________ _ 1 Stratigraphy--Continued Introduction ______________________________________ _ 2 Quaternary System-Continued Location ______________________________________ _ 2 Pleistocene Serie!Y-Continued Present investigation ___________________________ _ 2 Grand Island Formation ________________ _ 23 Acknowledgments ______________________________ _ 3 Sappa Formation __________
    [Show full text]
  • KANSAS V. NEBRASKA ET AL
    (Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2014 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus KANSAS v. NEBRASKA ET AL. ON EXCEPTIONS TO REPORT OF SPECIAL MASTER No. 126, Orig. Argued October 14, 2014—Decided February 24, 2015 In 1943, Congress approved the Republican River Compact, an agree- ment between Kansas, Nebraska, and Colorado to apportion the “vir- gin water originating in” the Republican River Basin. 57 Stat. 87. In 1998, Kansas filed an original action in this Court contending that Nebraska’s increased groundwater pumping was subject to regula- tion by the Compact to the extent that it depleted stream flow in the Basin. This Court agreed. Ensuing negotiations resulted in the 2002 Final Settlement Stipulation (Settlement), which established mecha- nisms to accurately measure water and promote compliance with the Compact. The Settlement identified the Accounting Procedures, a technical appendix, as the tool by which the States would measure stream flow depletion, and thus consumption, due to groundwater pumping. The Settlement also reaffirmed that “imported water”— that is, water brought into the Basin by human activity—would not count toward a State’s consumption. Again, the Accounting Proce- dures were to measure, so as to exclude, that water flow.
    [Show full text]
  • The Minnesota Gag Law and the Fourteenth Amendment
    MR, HARTMANN, a resident of Minneapolis, is enrolled in the University of Minnesota graduate school, where he is working toward a degree in American constitutional history. This is his first published article. The Minnesota GAG LAW and the Fourteenth Amendment JOHN E. HARTMANN ON JUNE 1,1931, the Supreme Court of the and the protection it affords a democratic United States handed down a decision community without the privflege this act which, according to one authority, repre­ seeks to limit." ^ sented "the climax of a striking evolution The origins of the Minnesota "gag law" in our Constitutional law whereby freedom are obscure. Some claim that it was spon­ of speech and press is at last effectively sored by a legislator intent on silencing an "nationalized'." In this decision, rendered in editor who was attacking him, and that the case of Near v. Minnesota, the court the editor died before the law could be for the first time used "the guarantee of applied to his particular publication.^ The liberty in the Fourteenth Amendment . bill was initiated in the Minnesota Senate to completely obliterate a state law."^ by Freling H. Stevens, a Minneapolis attor­ The law in question, which had been ney whose firm included his brother and enacted by the Minnesota legislature in his two sons. He was serving his second 1925, declared certain types of publications term as state senator, and politically he was a nuisance and provided for injunctions to a Progressive-Republican. When the bfll prevent their circulation. Of this Minnesota was introduced on March 27, 1925, as Sen­ measure — the first to provide for actual ate File 1181, it did not cause a furor.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing the Red River of the North
    FISHING THE RED RIVER OF THE NORTH The Red River boasts more than 70 species of fish. Channel catfish in the Red River can attain weights of more than 30 pounds, walleye as big as 13 pounds, and northern pike can grow as long as 45 inches. Includes access maps, fishing tips, local tourism contacts and more. TABLE OF CONTENTS YOUR GUIDE TO FISHING THE RED RIVER OF THE NORTH 3 FISHERIES MANAGEMENT 4 RIVER STEWARDSHIP 4 FISH OF THE RED RIVER 5 PUBLIC ACCESS MAP 6 PUBLIC ACCESS CHART 7 AREA MAPS 8 FISHING THE RED 9 TIP AND RAP 9 EATING FISH FROM THE RED RIVER 11 CATCH-AND-RELEASE 11 FISH RECIPES 11 LOCAL TOURISM CONTACTS 12 BE AWARE OF THE DANGERS OF DAMS 12 ©2017, State of Minnesota, Department of Natural Resources FAW-471-17 The Minnesota DNR prohibits discrimination in its programs and services based on race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, public assistance status, age, sexual orientation or disability. Persons with disabilities may request reasonable modifications to access or participate in DNR programs and services by contacting the DNR ADA Title II Coordinator at [email protected] or 651-259-5488. Discrimination inquiries should be sent to Minnesota DNR, 500 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, MN 55155-4049; or Office of Civil Rights, U.S. Department of the Interior, 1849 C. Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20240. This brochure was produced by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Division of Fish and Wildlife with technical assistance provided by the North Dakota Department of Game and Fish.
    [Show full text]
  • State Abbreviations
    State Abbreviations Postal Abbreviations for States/Territories On July 1, 1963, the Post Office Department introduced the five-digit ZIP Code. At the time, 10/1963– 1831 1874 1943 6/1963 present most addressing equipment could accommodate only 23 characters (including spaces) in the Alabama Al. Ala. Ala. ALA AL Alaska -- Alaska Alaska ALSK AK bottom line of the address. To make room for Arizona -- Ariz. Ariz. ARIZ AZ the ZIP Code, state names needed to be Arkansas Ar. T. Ark. Ark. ARK AR abbreviated. The Department provided an initial California -- Cal. Calif. CALIF CA list of abbreviations in June 1963, but many had Colorado -- Colo. Colo. COL CO three or four letters, which was still too long. In Connecticut Ct. Conn. Conn. CONN CT Delaware De. Del. Del. DEL DE October 1963, the Department settled on the District of D. C. D. C. D. C. DC DC current two-letter abbreviations. Since that time, Columbia only one change has been made: in 1969, at the Florida Fl. T. Fla. Fla. FLA FL request of the Canadian postal administration, Georgia Ga. Ga. Ga. GA GA Hawaii -- -- Hawaii HAW HI the abbreviation for Nebraska, originally NB, Idaho -- Idaho Idaho IDA ID was changed to NE, to avoid confusion with Illinois Il. Ill. Ill. ILL IL New Brunswick in Canada. Indiana Ia. Ind. Ind. IND IN Iowa -- Iowa Iowa IOWA IA Kansas -- Kans. Kans. KANS KS A list of state abbreviations since 1831 is Kentucky Ky. Ky. Ky. KY KY provided at right. A more complete list of current Louisiana La. La.
    [Show full text]
  • Missouri River Valley in North Eastern Nebraska
    Water-Supply Paper No. 2 15 f A, Economic Geology, 96 n I B, Descriptive Geology, 118 owm] M, General Hydrographic Investigations, 25 [ 0, Underground Waters, 71 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIRECTOR GEOLOGY AND WATER RESOURCES OF A PORTION OF THE MISSOURI RIVER VALLEY IN NORTH EASTERN NEBRASKA BY GK E. WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1908 CONTENTS. Page. Introduction___________________ Topography ___________________ Descriptive geology _____ Stratigraphy ____________ Structure__________________ Description of the rocks____ Cretaceous system ___ Dakota sandstone __ Benton group______ 10 Graueros shale_ 11 Greenhorn limestone 11 Carlile shale_ 12 Niobrara formation 13 Pierre shale_______ 15 Tertiary system________ 18 Arikaree formation- 18 Pliocene deposits_ 19 Quaternary system_____ 20 Glacial drift_______ 20 Loess ________. 20 Alluvium______. 21 Dune sand_________ 22 Economic geology______________ 22 Mineral resources__________ 22 Brick clay ____________ 22 Sand and gravel_______ 22 Building stone_________ 22 Cement rock________ 23 Coal ____________. 2-i Peat __________________ 2-1 Volcanic ash___________ 24 Water resources- __________ 25 General statement _____ 25 Surface waters ________ 25 Streams___________ 25 Springs _______. 20 Underground waters _ 27 Shallow wells _____ 27 Artesian wells_____ 28 Artesian conditions ___________________ 28. Chemical composition of artesian water- 28 Pressure _______________ _ 29 Temperature of artesian water________ 30 Construction and care of
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota Metropolitan Area
    Minnesota Metropolitan Area Clear Lake Zimmerman Stanford Twp. IsantiAthens Twp. Oxford Twp. Clear Lake Twp. Orrock Twp. Chisago Lake Twp. Livonia Twp. Lent Twp. Clearwater Becker Twp. Bethel St. Francis Stacy Center City Shafer Sherburne Lindstrom Clearwater Twp. Becker 169 Linwood Twp. Chisago City 10 East Bethel Big LakeBig Lake Twp. Burns Twp. Oak Grove Wyoming Twp. Franconia Twp. Silver Creek Twp. Elk River Wyoming Chisago Monticello Corinna Twp. Anoka Monticello Twp. Columbus Twp. Otsego Twp. Ramsey Andover Ham Lake Forest Lake New Scandia Twp. Maple Lake Twp. Albertville 35 Maple Lake Anoka Albion Twp. Buffalo Twp. St. Michael Rogers Marine on St. Croix Dayton Buffalo Hassan Twp. Chatham Twp. Coon Rapids Champlin Blaine Hanover Lino LakesCenterville Hugo May Twp. 169 Circle Pines Lexington Washington Rockford Twp. Osseo Spring Lake Park Wright Corcoran Maple Grove Brooklyn Park Mounds View White Bear Twp. Marysville Twp. Greenfield North Oaks Dellwood Stillwater Twp. Rockford Fridley Shoreview Grant Waverly 94 Montrose Hennepin Brooklyn Center Arden Hills Gem LakeBirchwood Village New Brighton Loretto White Bear LakeMahtomedi Stillwater Columbia Heights Vadnais Heights Delano New Hope Franklin Twp. Medina Crystal Pine Springs Oak Park Heights Woodland Twp. Independence Plymouth Robbinsdale St. Anthony Little Canada Bayport Roseville MaplewoodNorth St. Paul Maple Plain 36 Baytown Twp. Medicine Lake Lauderdale Lake Elmo Long Lake Golden Valley Falcon Heights 35E Oakdale Wayzata Winsted 394 West Lakeland Twp. Watertown Orono Minneapolis Ramsey Woodland St. Louis Park St. Paul Landfall Spring Park Hollywood Twp. Watertown Twp. Minnetrista Lakeland Mound DeephavenMinnetonka Hopkins Lake St. Croix Beach Shorewood Lilydale St. Bonifacius Tonka BayGreenwood West St.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020-2021 Minnesota-North Dakota Application for Reciprocity Benefits
    2020-2021 MINNESOTA-NORTH DAKOTA APPLICATION FOR RECIPROCITY BENEFITS MINNESOTA OFFICE OF HIGHER EDUCATION NORTH DAKOTA UNIVERSITY SYSTEM GENERAL INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTIONS Minnesota-North Dakota Tuition Reciprocity Program 2020-2021 Academic year (Fall 2020-Spring/Summer 2021) ✓ To avoid delay, applications must be mailed directly to the appropriate state agency by the applicant ✓ The application must be completed in ink or typed ✓ APPLICATION FOR RECIPROCITY IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE INDIVIDUAL HOW TO APPLY: Complete this application IN FULL and sign the certification. Mail the completed application DIRECTLY to the higher education agency located in the state of your residence. Reciprocity recipients who earned credits during the 2019-2020 academic year will automatically have benefits renewed for 2020-2021 at the institution reporting credits for the student during the 2019-2020 academic year. Therefore, these students do NOT need to complete a reciprocity application for the 2020-2021 academic year. If your current institution has not received notification of your renewal status by November 1, 2020, please contact the administering agency in your state of residence. APPLICATION DEADLINES COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES: The application for tuition reciprocity must be correctly completed and postmarked by the last day of classes in the term for which benefits are needed. The application deadline, except those in vocational and technical programs, is the last day of classes at the institution you are or will be attending in the term that benefits are required. Applications will not be processed retroactively. If you wish to participate in the program for the entire academic year, your application must be correctly completed and postmarked by the last day of scheduled classes in the fall term at the institution you are or will be attending.
    [Show full text]