DOCSLIB.ORG

Hydraulophones: Acoustic Musical Instruments and Expressive User Interfaces

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Hydraulophones: Acoustic musical instruments and expressive user interfaces by Ryan E. Janzen A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Applied Science Graduate Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Toronto Copyright c 2008 by Ryan E. Janzen Abstract Hydraulophones: Acoustic musical instruments and expressive user interfaces Ryan E. Janzen Master of Applied Science Graduate Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Toronto 2008 Fluid flow creates an expansive range of acoustic possibilities, particularly in the case of water, which has unique turbulence and vortex shedding properties as compared with the air of ordinary wind instruments. Sound from water flow is explained with reference to a new class of musical instruments, hydraulophones, in which oscillation originates directly from matter in its liquid state. Several hydraulophones which were realized in practical form are described. A unique user-interface consisting of a row of water jets is presented, in terms of its expressiveness, tactility, responsiveness to derivatives and inte- grals of displacement, and in terms of the direct physical interaction between a user and the physical process of sound production. Signal processing algorithms are introduced, which extract further information from turbulent water flow, for industrial applications as well as musical applications. Version v200809 ii The guidance, collaboration, knowledge, creativity, boldness, and camaraderie of Pro- fessor Steve Mann is greatly appreciated. The work of Dr. James Fung, Chris Aimone, Raymond Lo, Mark Post, Mike Hung, Ahmed Sharifi, Fabian Wauthier, and James Meier, in terms of previous and current contributions, is acknowledged and tributed. Recent hydraulophone installations in pub- lic spaces were designed in collaboration with Steve Mann and Chris Aimone. Concert performances were presented in collaboration with Steve Mann, Dr. John Derksen, Dr. Roger Mantie, John Kameel Farah, Nick Storring, Chris Aimone, Ariel Garten, Noah Mintz, Laura Bolt, and Eyal Katz. Demonstrations and concerts were done with the cooperation of: • Galapagos Art Space, New York • New York University • DGI-Byen, Copenhagen, Denmark • Nuit Blanche, Toronto • Luminato Festival, Toronto • Harbourfront Centre, Toronto • Music Gallery, Toronto • The Power Plant Contemporary Art Gallery, Toronto • Ontario Science Centre, Toronto • University of Toronto Faculty of Music • Hart House, Toronto • Hart House Symphonic Band • Knox College, Toronto • Dundas Square, Toronto • CITY-TV, Toronto • CBC Radio iii • Danish Radio • OM Reunion Festival • Brampton Independent Arts Festival • Kensington Market Pedestrian Sundays, Toronto • Grange Park, Toronto • Baldwin Street BIA Festival, Toronto • International Computer Music Conference 2007 • New Interfaces for Musical Expression Conference 2007 • IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo 2006 • ACM Multimedia 2007 • University of Augsburg, Germany The support of the Canada Council for the Arts, Ontario Arts Council, Toronto Arts Council, TELUS, and Ontario Centres of Excellence is acknowledged. iv Contents 1 Introduction: Musical Instruments in All States... 1 1.1 Classification of musical instruments as a context for hydraulophone . 1 1.2 Hydraulophone, and a physics-based organology . 3 1.3 States of matter, and musical terminology . 4 1.4 Early hydraulophones . 5 1.5 Contributions of this research work . 9 2 Is sound ever produced purely from liquid? 12 2.1 ......................................... 12 2.2 Acoustic oscillation in water already in existence . 13 2.3 Use of liquid in existing musical instruments, where liquid is not the pri- mary medium of sound generation . 14 2.4 Organological purity, and the state-of-matter of the sound source . 16 3 Sound Production from Liquid 18 3.1 Turbulence . 18 3.2 Turbulent Spectra . 19 3.3 Producing turbulence on purpose . 21 3.4 Karman vortex street . 22 3.5 Strouhal number . 23 3.6 Intentional introduction of Karman vortex street . 23 v 3.7 Background: Underwater acoustics . 24 4 Signal Processing of Fluid Dynamics Signals 27 4.1 Introduction . 27 4.2 Acoustic pickups to listen to turbulent sound . 27 4.2.1 Types of acoustic pickups . 28 4.2.2 Custom-built hydrophones . 29 4.2.3 Spatio-temporal uncertainty . 30 4.3 Detection and estimation of fluid flow based on sound alone . 32 4.3.1 Listening to water flow in hydraulophones . 35 4.4 Flow sensor using spectral-division least-squares . 35 4.4.1 Differentiating between hot and cold water . 37 4.4.2 Differentiating between flow rates . 37 4.5 Height of a water jet: Simple method to evaluate flow rate . 38 4.5.1 Theoretical analysis of water jet height . 39 4.5.2 Application . 41 4.6 Filterbanks . 42 4.7 Summary . 45 5 Properties and Applications of Modern Hydraulophones 46 5.1 Development of modern hydraulophones during the course of this research 46 5.2 Compositions and Performances . 47 5.3 Poiseuille Embouchure . 57 5.4 Absement and Presement . 61 5.5 Hydraulophone installations . 64 6 Fluid User-Interfaces 69 6.1 Fluid expressivity . 69 6.2 Multi-modal feedback . 70 vi 6.3 Self-cleaning keyboard . 72 6.4 On the ability of a fluid user-interface's mouths to repel foreign objects . 74 6.4.1 Theoretical analysis: Drag on a Sphere . 75 6.4.2 Levitation of a spherical object . 77 6.4.3 Small contaminants . 77 6.4.4 Large contaminants . 78 6.4.5 Evaluating jet flow . 79 6.4.6 Ontario Science Centre South Hydraulophone: Summary of data . 80 6.4.7 Summary . 81 6.5 Water jets as pixels: Water fountains as both sensors and displays . 82 6.5.1 Overview . 82 6.5.2 Water jets as interactive media . 82 6.5.3 Bidirectionality from flow control . 83 6.5.4 Sensory consistency, by valve design . 83 6.5.5 Application . 85 6.5.6 Programmatic sequence of the educational game . 86 6.5.7 Distinguishing sequential notes, and implications for level of difficulty 86 6.5.8 Contributions of the author (bidirectional fluid user-interfaces) . 89 6.6 Computer Vision for fluid user-interfaces . 90 6.7 Summary . 90 7 Conclusion 91 Bibliography 92 vii Chapter 1 Introduction: Musical Instruments in All States of Matter 1.1 Classification of musical instruments as a context for hydraulophone Sound produced by liquid matter is a physical phenomenon which has interesting applica- tions in engineering, science and music. As liquid sound phenomena can, for one, be used in musical instruments, the instruments and phenomena are perhaps best understood by first examining their context within the realm of existing musical instruments1. Traditionally, musical instruments have often been grouped into three categories: strings, wind and percussion. In 1703, S´ebastiende Brossard did precisely that [16] when he classified instruments in his Dictionnaire de Musique. Since then, various researchers have devised their own classification schemes to account for instruments newly discovered among cultures worldwide. In 1914, Erich von Hornbostel and Curt Sachs modified previous classification schemes, creating four main categories in an attempt to include all 1In this thesis, ideas on musical instrument organology follow the train of thought presented by S. Mann in [14] and later by Mann and Janzen in [16]. 1 Chapter 1. Introduction: Musical Instruments in All States... 2 conceivable instruments: idiophones (vibrations from the \substance of the instrument itself, owing to its solidity and elasticity ... without requiring stretched membranes or strings"), membranophones (having stretched membranes), chordophones (having long strings), and aerophones (using wind) [7, p.169]. As well, Francis Galpin (1910) and Sachs (1940) each added a category to account for instruments which made use of electricity [7, p.176][26]. Sachs used the name \elec- trophones" [26]. Among present-day organologists and ethnomusicologists, there is general agreement that this classification scheme should depend only on how sound is initially produced in the instrument [16]. For example, the fifth category, \electrophones", is reserved for instruments such as the Theremin, ondes-Martenot, and the modern synthesizer, which actually generate the sound signal source itself [16] electrically, regardless of whether electricity is used in some other fashion. An example of using electricity in some other fashion lies in a pipe organ. Even if there is an electric motor to pump wind into the organ, rather than a hand-operated blower, the pipe organ is still an aerophone. As well, it is still an aerophone regardless of whether the valves delivering wind to the pipes are mechanically, electrically, pneumatically, or hydraulically actuated [16]. The electric guitar serves as another example: Even if an effects pedal is added in order to post-process the audio signal, the electric guitar remains a chordophone. In describing the operation of an instrument, one could distinguish between how an instrument is controlled (i.e. that which comes before the initial sound production mechanism), how an instrument's sound is post-processed (that which comes after the sound production mechanism), and the physics of the sound production itself [16]. The physical state-of-matter of sound production played a role in a newer classification system proposed by Andre Shaeffner in 1932 [16], which he claimed was \exhaustive, potentially covering all real and conceivable instruments" [7, p176]. In the Schaeffner Chapter 1. Introduction: Musical Instruments in All States... 3 classification system, sound production in solid versus
Recommended publications
  • The KNIGHT REVISION of HORNBOSTEL-SACHS: a New Look at Musical Instrument Classification

    The KNIGHT REVISION of HORNBOSTEL-SACHS: a New Look at Musical Instrument Classification

    The KNIGHT REVISION of HORNBOSTEL-SACHS: a new look at musical instrument classification by Roderic C. Knight, Professor of Ethnomusicology Oberlin College Conservatory of Music, © 2015, Rev. 2017 Introduction The year 2015 marks the beginning of the second century for Hornbostel-Sachs, the venerable classification system for musical instruments, created by Erich M. von Hornbostel and Curt Sachs as Systematik der Musikinstrumente in 1914. In addition to pursuing their own interest in the subject, the authors were answering a need for museum scientists and musicologists to accurately identify musical instruments that were being brought to museums from around the globe. As a guiding principle for their classification, they focused on the mechanism by which an instrument sets the air in motion. The idea was not new. The Indian sage Bharata, working nearly 2000 years earlier, in compiling the knowledge of his era on dance, drama and music in the treatise Natyashastra, (ca. 200 C.E.) grouped musical instruments into four great classes, or vadya, based on this very idea: sushira, instruments you blow into; tata, instruments with strings to set the air in motion; avanaddha, instruments with membranes (i.e. drums), and ghana, instruments, usually of metal, that you strike. (This itemization and Bharata’s further discussion of the instruments is in Chapter 28 of the Natyashastra, first translated into English in 1961 by Manomohan Ghosh (Calcutta: The Asiatic Society, v.2). The immediate predecessor of the Systematik was a catalog for a newly-acquired collection at the Royal Conservatory of Music in Brussels. The collection included a large number of instruments from India, and the curator, Victor-Charles Mahillon, familiar with the Indian four-part system, decided to apply it in preparing his catalog, published in 1880 (this is best documented by Nazir Jairazbhoy in Selected Reports in Ethnomusicology – see 1990 in the timeline below).
  • CITY of LAGRANGE, GEORGIA REGULAR MEETING of the MAYOR and COUNCIL August 25, 2020 the CITY COUNCIL MEETING WAS HELD at GREAT WO

    CITY of LAGRANGE, GEORGIA REGULAR MEETING of the MAYOR and COUNCIL August 25, 2020 the CITY COUNCIL MEETING WAS HELD at GREAT WO

    CITY OF LAGRANGE, GEORGIA REGULAR MEETING OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL August 25, 2020 THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING WAS HELD AT GREAT WOLF CONFERENCE CENTER, 150 TOM HALL PARKWAY, LAGRANGE, GEORGIA, IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE COUNCIL RETREAT. Present: Mayor Jim Thornton; Council Members Nathan Gaskin, Mark Mitchell, Tom Gore, Jim Arrington, Willie Edmondson, and LeGree McCamey Also Present: City Manager Meg Kelsey; City Clerk Sue Olson; Assistant City Manager Bill Bulloch; Communications Manager Katie Van Schoor; City Attorney Jeff Todd The meeting was called to order by Mayor Thornton, the invocation was given by Council Member Dr. Willie Edmondson, and Mayor Thornton led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. On a motion by Mr. Edmondson seconded by Mr. Gaskin, Council unanimously approved the minutes of the regular Council meeting held on August 10, 2020. A public hearing was held to receive comments on amending the noise ordinance. No comments were received and on a motion by Mr. McCamey seconded by Mr. Gaskin, Council voted unanimously to approve the following ordinance: AN ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAGRANGE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE CITY; TO AMEND AND RE-ADOPT THE NOISE ORDINANCE IN ORDER TO PROHIBIT THE IGNITING OF CONSUMER FIREWORKS DURING CERTAIN HOURS; TO REPEAL CONFLICTING ORDINANCES; TO FIX AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAGRANGE, GEORGIA, HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That Section 35-1-19 of the code be amended by deleting said section, in its entirety, inserting in lieu thereof the following: “Sec.
  • 2017 Pipe Organ Report

    2017 Pipe Organ Report

    ORGAN REPORT 2604 N. Swan Blvd., Wauwatosa, WI 53226 JUNE 1, 2017 “Beauty evangelizes, and a new organ will strengthen the Christ King mission to proclaim Christ and make disciples in the world.” Table of Contents A Letter From the Organ Committee.................Pg. 2 The Organ Committee Process..........................Pg. 3 Addendum 1 of 2: Riedel Organ Condition Report..................Pg. 4-15 Addendum 2 of 2: Type of Organs.............................................Pg.16-20 From theTHE Committee... PIPE ORGAN AT CHRIST KING PARISH The Organ Committee at Christ King Parish was formed in 2015 at the request of the Pastoral Council and the Worship Committee to evaluate the condition of our current organ, plus its present and future role in our community. This report will provide details on the failing condition of our organ, the cost for refurbishment vs the cost of replacing the instrument and the vetting of organ building companies. In 2007, the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) issued a document entitled, “Sing to the Lord: Music in Divine Worship”. Drawing from several centuries of organ use in the Catholic Church the Bishops stated the following about organs: 87. Among all other instruments which are suitable for divine worship, the organ is “accorded pride of place” because of its capacity to sustain the singing of a large gathered assembly, due to both its size and its ability to give “resonance to the fullness of human sentiments, from joy to sadness, from praise to lamentation.” Likewise,” the manifold possibilities of the organ in some way remind us of the immensity and the magnificence of God” 88.
  • The Music of the Bible, with Some Account of the Development Of

    The Music of the Bible, with Some Account of the Development Of

    . BOUGHT WITH THE INCOl^E .. FROM THE SAGE ENDOWMENT FUlSfD THE GIFT OF Henrg W. Sage 1891 ,. A>.3ooq..i.i... /fiMJA MUSIC LIBRARY Cornell University Library ML 166.S78 1914 The music of the Bible with some account 3 1924 021 773 290 The original of tiiis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924021773290 Frontispiece. Sounding the Shophar. (p. 224/ THE MUSIC OF THE BIBLE WITH SOME ACCOUNT OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF MODERN MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS FROM ANCIENT TYPES BY JOHN STAINER M.A., MUS. DOC, MAGD. COLL., OXON. NEW EDITION : With Additional Illustrations and Supplementary Notes BY the Rev. F. W. GALPIN, M.A., F.L.S. London : NOVELLO AND COMPANY, Limited. New York: THE H. W. GRAY CO., Sole Agents for the U.S.A. [ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.] 5 ORIGINAL PREFACE. No apology is needed, I hope, for issuing in this form the substance of the series of articles which I contributed to the Bible Educator. Some of the statements which I brought forward in that work have received further confirmation by wider reading; but some others I have ventured to qualify or alter. Much new matter will be found here which I trust may be of interest to the general reader, if not of use to the professional. I fully anticipate a criticism to the effect that such a subject as the development of musical instruments should rather have been allowed to stand alone than have been associated with Bible music.
  • Trinity's Organ

    Trinity's Organ

    Trinity’s Organ The organ at Trinity was dedicated on October 23, 1994. In many ways it can be thought of as a reflection of our own congregation. There are 2,395 pipes in the organ. Trinity congregation, in 1994 was very close to that number in membership and has since then far surpassed it. The pipes in the organ actually form a “congregation of singers” made up of many different shapes and sizes. Some are short, some are tall. Some sing high, some sing low. Some are loud, some are soft. Each person in our sanctuary can combine his or her voice with others to offer up prayers and songs of praise. Each pipe in the organ “building” works along side of others to produce sounds for accompanying our songs of praise. We each have a mouth to sing God’s praise. Each pipe in the organ also has a mouth. The straight edge at the top of a pipe’s mouth is called the upper lip. The bottom edge is the lower lip. Pipes have “feet”, “bodies”, “ears”, and “tongues.” The pipes “sing” in much the same way as humans. Sound is produced when air causes something to vibrate. The sound then comes out through a mouth for all to hear. The pipes receive their breath for singing from a windchest. The sound produced by the pipes is thus a sound that is vibrant – “alive”! The organ at Trinity is an instrument allowed by God to be built for worship – an instrument whose breath will combine with ours to set in motion pipes for praise.
  • Level 3 Physics (90520) 2010

    Level 3 Physics (90520) 2010

    9 0 5 2 0 905200 3 For Supervisor’s use only Level 3 Physics, 2010 90520 Demonstrate understanding of wave systems Credits: Four 9.30 am Tuesday 23 November 2010 Check that the National Student Number (NSN) on your admission slip is the same as the number at the top of this page. Make sure you have the Resource Booklet L3-PHYSR. You should answer ALL the questions in this booklet. For each numerical answer, full working must be shown. The answer should be given with an SI unit to an appropriate number of significant figures. For each ‘describe’ or ‘explain’ question, the answer should be written or drawn clearly with all logic fully explained. If you need more space for any answer, use the page(s) provided at the back of this booklet and clearly number the question. Check that this booklet has pages 2–8 in the correct order and that none of these pages is blank. YOU MUST HAND THIS BOOKLET TO THE SUPERVISOR AT THE END OF THE EXAMINATION. For Assessor’s use only Achievement Criteria Achievement Achievement Achievement with Merit with Excellence Identify or describe aspects Give descriptions or explanations Give explanations that show of phenomena, concepts or in terms of phenomena, clear understanding in terms of principles. concepts, principles and / or phenomena, concepts, principles relationships. and / or relationships. Solve straightforward problems. Solve problems. Solve complex problems. Overall Level of Performance (all criteria within a column are met) © New Zealand Qualifications Authority, 2010 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced by any means without the prior permission of the New Zealand Qualifications Authority.
  • Seeking Cavaillé-Coll Organs in North America We Are Forging Ahead, Indeed, and with No Little Palatable AGNES ARMSTRONG Success

    Seeking Cavaillé-Coll Organs in North America We Are Forging Ahead, Indeed, and with No Little Palatable AGNES ARMSTRONG Success

    VOLUME 59, NUMBER 1, WINTER 2015 THE TRACKER JOURNAL OF THE ORGAN HISTORICAL SOCIETY ORGAN HISTORICAL SOCIETY•JUNE 28-JULY 3 THE PIONEER VALLEY - WESTERN MASS. Join us for the 60th Annual OHS Convention, and our first visit to this cradle of American organbuilding. WILLIAM JACKSON (1868) CASAVANT FRÈRES LTÉE. (1897) C.B. FISK (1977) JOHNSON & SON (1892) JOHNSON & SON (1874) EMMONS HOWARD (1907) Come! Celebrate! Explore! ALSO SHOWCASING THE WORK OF HILBORNE ROOSEVELT, E. & G.G. HOOK, AEOLIAN-SKINNER, AND ANDOVER ORGAN WWW.ORGANSOCIETY.ORG/2015 SKINNER ORGAN CO. (1921) HILBORNE L. ROOSEVELT (1883) 2015 E. POWER BIGGS FELLOWSHIP HONORING A NOTABLE ADVOCATE FOR examining and understanding the pipe or- DEADLINE FOR APPLICATIONS gan, the E. Power Biggs Fellows will attend is February 28, 2015. Open to women the OHS 60th Convention in the Pioneer and men of all ages. To apply, go to Valley and the Berkshires of Western Mas- HTTP: // BIGGS.ORGANSOCIETY.ORG sachusetts, June 28 – July 3, 2015, with headquarters in Springfield, Mass. Hear and experience a wide variety of pipe or- gans in the company of organ builders, professional musicians and enthusiasts. 2015 COMMITTEE The Fellowship includes a two-year member- SAMUEL BAKER CHAIR TOM GIBBS VICE CHAIR ship in the OHS and covers these convention costs: GREGORY CROWELL CHRISTA RAKICH ♦ Travel ♦ Meals PAUL FRITTS PRISCILLA WEAVER ♦ ♦ Hotel Registration LEN LEVASSEUR LEN ORGAN HISTORICAL SOCIETY WWW.ORGANSOCIETY.ORG PHOTOS J.W. STEERE & SON (1902) A DAVID MOORE INC World-Class Tracker Organs Built in Vermont Photos Courtesy of J. O. Love A Gem Rises We are pleased to announce that our Opus 37 is nearing completion at St Paul Catholic Parish, Pensacola, Florida.
  • Hornbostel-Sachs Classification of Musical Instruments†

    Hornbostel-Sachs Classification of Musical Instruments†

    72 Knowl. Org. 47(2020)No.1 D. Lee. Hornbostel-Sachs Classification of Musical Instruments Hornbostel-Sachs Classification of Musical Instruments† Deborah Lee City, University of London, Department of Library and Information Science, Northampton Square, London EC1V 0HB, England, <[email protected]> Deborah Lee is a visiting lecturer at City, University of London, where she leads the information organization module. She was awarded her PhD in library and information science in 2017 from City, University of London. Her thesis, entitled “Modelling Music: A Theoretical Approach to the Classification of Notated Western Art Music,” was supervised by Professor David Bawden. Her research interests include music classification, the the- ory and aesthetics of classification schemes, music as information and the pedagogy of cataloguing education. Deborah is also the Joint Acting Head of the Book Library and Senior Cataloguer at the Courtauld Institute of Art. Lee, Deborah. 2020. “Hornbostel-Sachs Classification of Musical Instruments.” Knowledge Organization 47(1): 72- 91. 73 references. DOI:10.5771/0943-7444-2020-1-72. Abstract: This paper discusses the Hornbostel-Sachs Classification of Musical Instruments. This classification system was originally designed for musical instruments and books about instruments, and was first published in German in 1914. Hornbostel-Sachs has dominated organological discourse and practice since its creation, and this article analyses the scheme’s context, background, versions and impact. The position of Hornbostel-Sachs in the history and development of instrument classification is explored. This is followed by a detailed analysis of the mechanics of the scheme, including its decimal notation, the influential broad categories of the scheme, its warrant and its typographical layout.
  • Development of Science» («Развитие Науки»): Материалы Конкурсов Исследовательских Работ На Английском Языке (2018–2019 Гг.)

    Development of Science» («Развитие Науки»): Материалы Конкурсов Исследовательских Работ На Английском Языке (2018–2019 Гг.)

    Министерство культуры Пермского края Пермская государственная ордена «Знак Почета» краевая универсальная библиотека им. А. М. Горького Коммуникативная площадка научного сообщества («Центр науки») «Development of Science» («Развитие науки»): материалы конкурсов исследовательских работ на английском языке (2018–2019 гг.) Пермь 2019 УДК 001:378.147.88=111 (079) ББК 72 D49 Development of Science = Развитие науки : материалы конкурсов исследо- вательских работ на английском языке (2018–2019 гг.) / Пермская государ- ственная краевая универсальная библиотека им. А. М. Горького ; сост. И. И. Муравьев. – Пермь : [б. и.], 2019. – 86 с. – ISBN 978-5-6043295-1-1. В сборнике представлены материалы второго и третьего ежегодных кон- курсов работ на английском языке «Development of Science» («Развитие науки»). Второй конкурс был посвящен проблемам и направлениям развития города Перми, третий конкурс прошел под темой «Взгляд в будущее: моя страна и мир к 2040 году». Работы представили 14 студентов пермских вузов, раскрыв заяв- ленные темы с позиций разных наук и областей человеческих знаний. Составитель И. И. Муравьев Технический редактор А. Н. Ругалева Библиографический редактор Л. В. Дудина ISBN 978-5-6043295-1-1 © ГКБУК «ПГКУБ им. А. М. Горького» Content From the originator……………………………………………………………………5 Problems and development path of Perm city (contest of 2018) The health status of socially excluded people evaluation (Voronova A.) ……............ 7 Sociological research of Perm University culture: does the organizational culture of employees contribute to innovation? (Gabbasova D.) ………….…………………. 14 Art in Perm (Efremova A.) ……………………………………………………….... 21 The Architecture of Perm: Past, Present and Future (Kashitskiy I.) …………….… 27 Problems of Municipal Solid Waste (Panina Y.) ………...………………………… 33 The social status of a journalist in the opinion of the youth of the city of Perm (Pachi- na Y.) .........................................................................................................................
  • Hollywood Edge Sound Effects Cartoon Trax

    Hollywood Edge Sound Effects Cartoon Trax

    Hollywood Edge Sound Effects Cartoon Trax Finding Sound Effects: 1. Use the Excel menu to search the descriptions for key terms ( Ctrl + F ). 2. Write down the Disk and Track numbers and give them to the Media Desk assistant. reproduced with permission from www.hollywoodedge.com Disk Track Time Description CRT-01 1 0:07 Large Swarm Of Bees, Agitated Buzzing. CRT-01 1 0:11 Medium-high Pitched Insect Buzzing Around ( Kind Of Like Air Escaping From A Balloon ) ( i.e. Mosquito Buzz ). CRT-01 1 0:12 Several Different Insects Buzzing Around [stereo]. CRT-01 1 0:08 Medium Insect Buzzing Around CRT-01 1 0:13 High Pitched Insect Buzzing Around, Distant Perspective, ( Kind Of Like Air Escaping From A Balloon ) ( i.e. Mosquito Buzz ). CRT-01 1 0:15 Swarm Of Insects Buzzing Around CRT-01 2 0:12 Fly Buzz - Annoying Sound. CRT-01 2 0:04 Fly Buzz Around And By - Annoying. CRT-01 2 0:08 Fly Buzz In And Short Back And Forth Buzzes ( i.e. Dodging Fly Swatter ). CRT-01 2 0:08 Fly Buzz In, Quick Buzz In Face, Rapid Circles And Away At Tail - Annoying. CRT-01 2 0:04 Funny Fly Buzz CRT-01 2 0:04 Funny Fly Buzz, Sounds Like Talking CRT-01 2 0:04 Funny Fly Buzz, Sounds Like High-pitched Talking CRT-01 2 0:08 Funny Fly Buzz, ( i.e. Fly Sputters To A Halt In Mid Air, Falls Out Of The Sky ) CRT-01 3 0:09 Funny Fly Breaths - Heavy W / Wing Buzz On Exhale ( i.e.
  • Theatre Organ Bombarde'." -•- A

    Theatre Organ Bombarde'." -•- A

    TheatreOrgan Bombarde JOURNAL of the AMERICAN THEATREORGAN ENTHUSIASTS .... .·· ·•• ..... ...········· .. ..... ·•········~•.x. ..• •.....·•."··•·· ·-..•~· ..... ""- Los Angeles Elks Temple Concert Morton STU GREEN observes THE GUYS WHO FIXED THE ORGAN - Page FIVE New Wurlitzer Theatre Organ The modern Theatre Console Organ that combines the grandeur of yesterday with the electronic wizardry of today. Command performance! Wurlitzer combines the classic Horseshoe Design of the immortal Mighty Wurlitzer with the exclusive Total Tone electronic circuitry of today. Knowledge and craftsmanship from the Mighty Wurlitzer Era have produced authentic console dimensions in this magnificent new theatre organ. It stands apart, in an instru­ ment of its size, from all imitative theatre organ • Dual system of tone generation • Authentic Mighty Wurlitzer Horseshoe Design designs. To achieve its big, rich and electrifying • Authentic voicing of theatrical Tibia and tone, Wurlitzer harmonically "photographed" Kinura originating on the Mighty Wurlitzer pipe organ voices of the Mighty Wurlitzer pipe organ to • Four families of organ tone serve as a standard. The resultant voices are au­ • Two 61-note keyboards • 25-note pedal keyboard with two 16 ' and thentic individually, and when combined they two 8 ' pedal voices augmented by Sustain blend into a rich ensemble of magnificent dimen­ • Multi-Matic Percussion ® with Ssh-Boom ®, Sustain, Repeat, Attack , Pizzicato, and sion. Then, to crown the accomplishment, we Bongo Percussion incorporated the famous Wurlitzer Multi-Matic • Silicon transistors for minimum maintenance Percussion ® section with exclusive Ssh-Boom ® • Reverb, Slide , Chimes, and Solo controls • Electronic Vibrato (4 settings) that requires no special playing techniques, • Exclusive 2 speed Spectra -Tone ® Sound Pizzi ca to Touch that was found only on larger pipe in Motion • Two-channel solid state amplifiers , 70 watts organs, Chimes and Slide Con trol ..
  • City Research Online

    City Research Online

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by City Research Online City Research Online City, University of London Institutional Repository Citation: Lee, D. ORCID: 0000-0002-5768-9262 (2019). Hornbostel-Sachs Classification of Musical Instruments. Knowledge Organization, 47(1), pp. 72-91. This is the accepted version of the paper. This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent repository link: https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/22554/ Link to published version: Copyright and reuse: City Research Online aims to make research outputs of City, University of London available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the author(s) and/or copyright holders. URLs from City Research Online may be freely distributed and linked to. City Research Online: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/ [email protected] Hornbostel-Sachs Classification of Musical Instruments Abstract This paper discusses the Hornbostel-Sachs Classification of Musical Instruments. This classification system was originally designed for musical instruments and books about instruments, and was first published in German in 1914. Hornbostel-Sachs has dominated organological discourse and practice since its creation, and this article analyses the scheme’s context, background, versions and impact. The position of Hornbostel-Sachs in the history and development of instrument classification is explored. This is followed by a detailed analysis of the mechanics of the scheme, including its decimal notation, the influential broad categories of the scheme, its warrant, and its typographical layout. The version history of the scheme is outlined and the relationships between versions is visualised, including its translations, the introduction of the electrophones category, and the Musical Instruments Museums Online (MIMO) version designed for a digital environment.