Leisure Policy in New Zealand and Malaysia: a Comparative Study of Developments in Sport and Physical Recreation
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
LEISURE POLICY IN NEW ZEALAND AND MALAYSIA: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DEVELOPMENTS IN SPORT AND PHYSICAL RECREATION . A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy At Lincoln University By Mohd Salleh Aman Lincoln University New Zealand 2005 11 Abstract of thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Leisure policy in New Zealand and Malaysia: A comparative study of developments in sport and physical recreation by Mohd Salleh Aman This comparative study assessed the usefulness of the convergence thesis as a tool for understanding developments in leisure, recreation and sport in New Zealand and Malaysia. The study examined the interrelationship between 'global' and 'local' or 'contingent' factors and their impact upon leisure behaviour, leisure policy and leisure structures. 'Local' factors included institutional arrangements (notably political ones) and national cultural practices. A social history of New Zealand and Malaysia with particular reference to leisure, sport and recreation and national cultural practices was provided as a context for discussion of these issues. The study utilised a mixture of archival and library research and semi-structured interview, and was guided by an explicit comparative framework, concentrating on the development of leisure, sport and recreation in the two countries between 1970 and 2002. Interviews with 'key players' in both countries captured valuable data in the form of 'insiders' views' on leisure behaviour, policy and structure. These data were analysed with the relevance of the convergence thesis in mind. This study shows that contemporary leisure behaviour in New Zealand and Malaysia is shaped by the media and is highly commercialised, placing a high value on entertainment, and involves increasingly passive forms of participation. Informal sport and individualised recreational activities are replacing organised team-based sports in popularity. Leisure behaviour trends have led governments in both countries to encourage greater participation in sport and physical activity and to encourage private sector iii ventures into leisure-related products, services and infra-structures in the form of private public partnerships. In terms ofleisure policy, developments in leisure, recreation and, noticeably, sport, in Malaysia and New Zealand have been shaped by the wider agendas of the governing political parties. This is particularly noticeable at central government level. Individual political leaders in both countries have been influential in setting leisure-related policy. They had the vision to see that sport in particular might serve wider, national interests and that investments in sport could help raise the profiles of their countries jn international markets and among trading organisations and the regulatory bodies that oversee trading practices. Malaysian and New Zealand governments seek to make leisure, sport and recreation policy supportive of other priorities. In Malaysia, the government legitimises its control over the policies which affect people's lives by appeals to Islamic principles and the need to put collective needs of nation building ahead of individual concerns for freedom. In terms of institutional, political, arrangements, this impacts at both central and local government levels in Malaysia. New Zealand, following a pluralist, Westminster, tradition of political representation, experiences regular changes in political management at central government level and a system of local government whereby local autonomy is jealously protected. Malaysia has resisted 'the global', by virtue of the nation-building policies of the Barisan Nasional, which has been in power since 1957. New Zealand's 'resistance' stems in part at least from the autonomy which local government enjoys. These experiences demonstrate that resistance to 'global' change can take varied forms at the 'local', contingent, level (Thorns, 1992). Differences in leisure structures reflect, once again, different agendas stemming from different political arrangements. The Malaysian government's approach is multi Ministry, and micro-managed. In New Zealand, a 'hands off' approach via a quasi autonomous non-government organisation CQuango'), became the favoured means of iv structuring central government leisure provision in the 1980s and 1990s. This was with a view to encouraging stability and consistency in leisure policy and provision in a pluralistic political system. Overall, and 'cautiously', this study provided support for the convergence thesis as a way to explain development in leisure, recreation and sport in New Zealand and Malaysia over the past 32 years. Although institutional arrangements and national cultural practices have provided some resistance to convergence processes, changing consumer sentiments may weaken such resistance in future. Key Words: Convergence, convergence thesIs, leisure policy, Malaysian leisure policy, New Zealand leisure policy, comparative analysis, contingency, globalisation, leisure consumption, resistance, Elite Sport, Sport-for-AlI, leisure behaviour, leisure structures, sport and recreation. v Acknowledgement In undertaking this research, I have been greatly assisted by many individuals and agencies whose contributions in one way or another have brought about the materialisation of this thesis. I would like to extend my deepest gratitude to my first supervisor Bob Gidlow for his professional guidance and constructive criticism. I am also grateful to my co-supervisor Professor Grant Cushman for his ideas and positive contributions. The close supervision and helpful comments from both of them have markedly improved the content of my thesis. I acknowledge my debt to my"Malaysian supervisor Associate Professor Dr. Mohamed Nor Che' Noh, who passed away before the completion of this thesis. The research would not have been possible without the financial assistance of University of Malaya for granting overseas study leave. I am also grateful to Lincoln University's postgraduate fund. I would like to acknowledge the generosity and kindness of National Sport Council and Ministry of Youth and Sport, Malaysia. I wish to thank these individuals: Tan Sri Abdullah Sanusi Ahmad, Rosli Hussein, Datuk A. Hamid, Khoo Kay Kim, M. Jegathesan, Wan Sabri, Sallehuddin, Naza, Rashidi, Munir, Faithal, Jun, Douglas Brougton, Geoff Ormandy, Harvey Perkins, Claire Simpson and Geraldine. I wish to offer special thanks to all the informants all over New Zealand and Malaysia who took time off their busy schedules to participate and made this study possible. They have provided rich and colourful meaning to the better understanding of the subjective leisure experience. It was a pleasure getting to know them and I am grateful for their friendship. Finally, I wish to express my appreciation to my family for their thoughtfulness and encouragement throughout my studies. To my mother, and my late father, thank you for everything. To my children, Adam, Anis, Ummi, Ali and Aman, I owe you love and support. To my wife Zaleha, whose assistance has been invaluable, and whose patience and understanding have sustained my efforts, I dedicate this thesis. Above all, I thank you God for giving me Your Blessings to complete my study. VI Table of Contents Abstract ii Acknowledgement v Table of contents vi List pf figures xi Chapter 1: Introduction 1 1.0 Introduction 1 1.1 Thesis objectives 3 1.2 The convergence thesis 4 1.2.1 The nature of convergence 4 1.2.2· Convergence thesis: the strengths and weaknesses 6 1.2.3 Convergence via globalisation 8 1.2.4 Globalisation in leisure and sport 11 1.3 Government involvement in leisure, sport and recreation 15 1.3.1 Government support of economic development 15 1.3.2 Institutional arrangements 16 1.4 Culture 16 1.4.1 National cultural practice 17 1.5 Global consciousness versus contingent experience 18 1.6 The concepts of leisure, sport and recreation 20 1.6.1 Leisure 20 1.6.2 Sport 21 1.6.3 Recreation 22 1.7 Organisation of the thesis 24 1.8 Summary 24 Chapter 2: Research framework and methodology 25 2.0. Introduction 25 2.1 Research time frame 25 2.2 Information sources regarding leisure, sport and recreation in New Zealand and Malaysia 26 2.3 Methods 27 2.3.1 Library and archival research 27 2.3.2 Interviewing 'key players' in the development ofleisure policy 28 2.4 Comparative framework 31 2.4.1 Rationale 31 2.4.2 Cross-national research 31 2.5 Research framework 33 2.6 Summary 34 Vll Chapter 3: Cultural histories of New Zealand and Malaysia 35 3.0 Introduction 35 3.1 New Zealand: cultural history 35 3.1.1 The place 35 3.1.2 History 37 3.1.3 The people 39 3.1.4 Government 40 3.1.5 Economy 42 3.2 The history of leisure, sport and recreation in New Zealand 44 3.3 Malaysia: cultural history 48 3.3.1 The place 48 3.3.2 History 49 3.3.3 The people 49 3.3.4 Government 54 3.3.5 Economy 56 3.4 The history of leisure, sport and recreation in Malaysia 57 3.5 A comparison of different aspects of cultures in New Zealand and Malaysia 60 3.5.1 The individual and the collective 60 3.5.2 Beliefs systems 63 3.5.3 Symbols and rituals 66 3.5.4 Heroes 67 3.6 Summary 70 Chapter 4: Leisure behaviour in New Zealand and Malaysia 72 4.0 Introduction 72 4.1 Contemporary leisure patterns 72 4.2 The economic contribution of leisure behaviour 78 4.3 The emphasis on sport and physical activity in leisure policy 80 4.4 Summary 83 Chapter 5: The evolution of central government involvement in leisure,