DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 2 Hazards to Engineering Lifelines in Christchurch

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chapter 2 Hazards to Engineering Lifelines in Christchurch Please Note: The contact details given in this 1997 publication are no longer correct. Current contact information (2010) is: New Zealand Centre for Advanced Engineering Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand Phone: +64 3 364 2478 Fax: +63 3 364 2069 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.caenz.com Risks Realities A Multi-disciplinary Approach to the Vulnerability of Lifelines to Natural Hazards Report of the Christchurch Engineering Lifelines Group Centre for Advanced Engineering University of Canterbury Christchurch New Zealand ISBN 0-908993-12-9 First printing, November 1997 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, transmitted, or otherwise disseminated, in any form or by any means, except for the purposes of research or private study, criticism or review, without the prior permission of the Centre for Advanced Engineering. Copyright © 1997 Centre for Advanced Engineering, Private Bag 4800, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand. Project Manager John Lamb, Christchurch Engineering Lifelines Group. Editorial Services, Graphics and Book Design Charles Hendtlass and Úna O'Grady, Centre for Advanced Engineering. Cover Photograph by Michael Provost Photography. View looking west from above Banks Peninsula showing: Lyttelton Port; the Port Hills; the Estuary; the Sewage Treatment Works; the Central Business District of Christchurch; Christchurch Interna- tional Airport; the Southern Alps. Cover Design and Printing Print City, Christchurch. Disclaimer It will be noted that the authorship of this document has been attributed to the many individuals and organisations involved in its production. While all sections have been subject to review and final editing, the opinions expressed remain those of the authors responsible and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Centre for Advanced Engineering. This report by its nature is general in its application and subjective in its recommendations and is intended as an initial guide only. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the report, no liability whatsoever can be accepted for any error or misprint. Any persons concerned with any of the issues raised in this report should consult their professional advisers before undertaking any action, and no liability whatsoever shall attach to any party associated with the report for any reliance that any person may purport to place in the report. Centre for Advanced Engineering Establishment Function The Centre for Advanced Engineering was founded in The Centre is managed by a Board of Directors compris- May 1987 to mark the centenary of the School of Engi- ing representatives from industry, the engineering pro- neering at the University of Canterbury. It was estab- fession and the University of Canterbury. Chairman of lished by means of an appeal fund launched in conjunc- the Board is Mr Brian Wood of Christchurch. The Board tion with the centennial celebrations. To date approxi- selects the title for each project undertaken by the Centre mately $2 million has been raised, contributed by 150 and approves the level of funding. A Steering Committee corporate donors and 750 individual donors. The earn- is then appointed, initially to carry out detailed planning ings from this capital sum assist in funding the activities for the project and then to provide overall direction. The of the Centre. A 10th Anniversary Appeal has been Steering Committee appoints Task Group Leaders and a launched in 1997 to provide additional financial support Project Manager. to the Centre in its ongoing projects. Detailed work on the project is carried out on a voluntary basis by the members appointed to each Task Group. The Centre arranges to bring to New Zealand, at the Objective appropriate time, one or more Visiting Fellows to work The objective of the Centre is to enhance engineering with members of the Task Groups, bringing to the project knowledge within New Zealand in identified areas judged the latest relevant information from overseas. to be of national importance and to engage in technology transfer of the latest research information available from The Centre also undertakes a variety of smaller projects overseas. The Centre is not concerned with basic engi- and produces publications on engineering subjects of neering research but with the application of research current concern, and arranges lectures and seminars on findings to engineering problems and practice. appropriate topics as the occasion arises. The objective is achieved for each major project under- Contact: taken by bringing together a selected group of practising Centre for Advanced Engineering and research engineers and experts in the particular field University of Canterbury from both New Zealand and overseas to: Private Bag 4800 Christchurch • consolidate existing knowledge; New Zealand • study advanced techniques; Street Address: 39 Creyke Road • develop approaches to particular problems in engi- Christchurch 8004 neering and technology; Telephone: +64-3-364-2478 • promote excellence in engineering practice; and Fax: +64-3-364-2069 • disseminate findings through documentation and e-mail: [email protected] public seminars. http: www.cae.canterbury.ac.nz A unique forum for co-operation among industry, the Executive Director: John P Blakeley engineering profession and university research engi- Projects Director: John L Lumsden neers is thus provided. NOTE: Although the Christchurch Engineering Lifelines project has been based upon earlier work in 1990/91 on the Wellington Case Study of Lifelines in Earthquakes, the Christchurch project has been undertaken by a separate Christchurch Engineering Lifelines Group, not under the general direction of the Centre for Advanced Engineering (CAE). John Lumsden, Projects Director of CAE, has been on the Steering Committee of the Christchurch Group and CAE has been responsible for the publication of this book. B Contents Preface .................................................................................................................................................................... v Project Team Participants ................................................................................................................................. vii Acknowledgements .............................................................................................................................................. ix Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................. xi Photographs .................................................................................................................... following page xiii Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................... xxxi 1 Risk Assessment, Methodology, Vulnerability, Impact and Importance ........................................................ 1 2 Hazards to Engineering Lifelines in Christchurch 2.1 Seismic Hazards ........................................................................................................................................ 17 2.2 Earthquake Hazards ................................................................................................................................... 18 2.3 Waimakariri Flood Hazard ........................................................................................................................ 29 2.4 Local Flooding Hazard .............................................................................................................................. 30 2.5 Tsunami Hazard ......................................................................................................................................... 31 2.6 Extreme Wind Storm Scenario .................................................................................................................. 34 2.7 Snowstorm Scenario .................................................................................................................................. 39 2.8 Slope Hazard and Damage to Services on Hills ........................................................................................ 45 3 Seismic Liquefaction and Lifelines 3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 47 3.2 Fundamentals ............................................................................................................................................. 50 3.3 Level Ground Liquefaction ....................................................................................................................... 51 3.4 Christchurch Lifelines Study ..................................................................................................................... 57 3.5 Sustained Shear Stress ............................................................................................................................... 58 3.6 Counter Measures ...................................................................................................................................... 60 3.7 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................. 61 3.8 References ................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • APPENDIX B Map Series APPENDIX B APPENDIX EARTHQUAKE COMMISSION: Canterbury Earthquakes 2010 and 2011 - Land Report As at 29 February 2012 28
    APPENDIX B APPENDIX B Map series EARTHQUAKE COMMISSION: Canterbury Earthquakes 2010 and 2011 - Land report as at 29 February 2012 28 Map series Map series 1 - Overview maps Map 1.1 General overview map 29 Map 1.2 Overview map - Northern suburbs 30 Map 1.3 Overview map - Central suburbs 31 Map 1.4 Overview map - Eastern suburbs 32 Map 1.5 Overview map - Southern suburbs 33 Map 1.6 Overview map - Port Hills and Lyttelton suburbs 34 Map series 2 - Northern suburbs Map 2a General land observation map Total area of liquefaction observations to 13 June 2011 35 Map 2b Detailed land observation map Recorded observations from 4 September 2010 36 Map 2c Detailed land observation map Recorded observations from 22 February 2011 37 Map 2d Observed ground cracking Crack locations post 4 September 2010 and 22 February 2011 38 Map 2e Groundwater elevation contours 39 Map 2f LiDAR survey Bare earth digital elevation model pre September 2010 40 Map 2g LiDAR survey Bare earth digital elevation model post June 2011 41 Map 2h Ground surface elevation change LiDAR difference pre 2010 to post June 2011 42 Map series 3 - Central suburbs Map 3a General land observation map Total area of liquefaction observations to 13 June 2011 43 Map 3b Detailed land observation map Recorded observations from 4 September 2010 44 Map 3c Detailed land observation map Recorded observations from 22 February 2011 45 Map 3d Observed ground cracking Crack locations post 4 September 2010 and 22 February 2011 46 Map 3e Groundwater elevation contours 47 Map 3f LiDAR survey Bare earth
    [Show full text]
  • The Mw 6.3 Christchurch, New Zealand Earthquake of 22 February 2011
    THE MW 6.3 CHRISTCHURCH, NEW ZEALAND EARTHQUAKE OF 22 FEBRUARY 2011 A FIELD REPORT BY EEFIT THE CHRISTCHURCH, NEW ZEALAND EARTHQUAKE OF 22 FEBRUARY 2011 A FIELD REPORT BY EEFIT Sean Wilkinson Matthew Free Damian Grant David Boon Sarah Paganoni Anna Mason Elizabeth Williams Stuart Fraser Jenny Haskell Earthquake Field Investigation Team Institution of Structural Engineers 47 - 58 Bastwick Street London EC1V 3PS Tel 0207235 4535 Fax 0207235 4294 Email: [email protected] June 2011 The Mw 6.2 Christchurch Earthquake of 22 February 2011 1 CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 3 1. INTRODUCTION 4 2. REGIONAL TECTONIC AND GEOLOGICAL SETTING 6 3. SEISMOLOGICAL ASPECTS 12 4. NEW ZEALAND BUILDING STOCK AND DESIGN PRACTICE 25 5. PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS 32 6. PERFORMANCE OF LIFELINES 53 7. GEOTECHNICAL ASPECTS 62 8. DISASTER MANAGEMENT 96 9. ECONOMIC LOSSES AND INSURANCE 108 10. CONCLUSIONS 110 11. REFERENCES 112 APPENDIX A: DETAILED RESIDENTIAL DAMAGE SURVEY 117 The Mw 6.2 Christchurch Earthquake of 22 February 2011 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to express their thanks to the many individuals and organisations that have assisted with the EEFIT mission to Christchurch and in the preparation of this report. We thank Arup for enabling Matthew Free to attend this mission and the British Geological Survey for allowing David Boon to attend. We would also like to thank the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council for providing funding for Sean Wilkinson, Damian Grant, Elizabeth Paganoni and Sarah Paganoni to join the team. Their continued support in enabling UK academics to witness the aftermath of earthquakes and the effects on structures and the communities they serve is gratefully acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Heritage Evaluation Royal New Zealand Air Force (RNZAF) Hobsonville Headquarters and Parade Ground (Former)
    Historic Heritage Evaluation Royal New Zealand Air Force (RNZAF) Hobsonville Headquarters and Parade Ground (former) 135 and 214 Buckley Avenue, Hobsonville Figure 1: RNZAF Headquarters (5 July 2017; Auckland Council) Prepared by Auckland Council Heritage Unit July 2017 1.0 Purpose The purpose of this document is to consider the place located at 135 and 214 Buckley Road, Hobsonville against the criteria for evaluation of historic heritage in the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in Part) (AUP). The document has been prepared by Emma Rush, Senior Advisor Special Projects – Heritage; and Rebecca Freeman – Senior Specialist Historic Heritage, Heritage Unit, Auckland Council. It is solely for the use of Auckland Council for the purpose it is intended in accordance with the agreed scope of work. 2.0 Identification 135 Buckley Avenue, Hobsonville (Parade Ground) and 214 Buckley Avenue, Hobsonville (former Site address Headquarters) Legal description 135 Buckley Ave - LOT 11 DP 484575 and Certificate of 214 Buckley Ave - Section 1 SO 490900 Title identifier Road reserve – Lot 15 DP 484575 NZTM grid Headquarters – Northing: 5927369; Easting: reference 1748686 Parade Ground – Northing: 5927360; Easting: 1748666 Ownership 135 Buckley Avenue – Auckland Council 214 Buckley Avenue – Auckland Council Road reserve – Auckland Transport Auckland Unitary 135 Buckley Avenue (Parade Ground) Plan zoning Open Space – Informal Recreation Zone 214 Buckley Avenue (former Headquarters) Residential - Mixed Housing Urban Zone Existing scheduled Hobsonville RNZAF
    [Show full text]
  • 840 Ngai Tahu Property – Evidence of Trevor Watt
    Evidence of Trevor Watt with appendices 840 Ngai Tahu Property page 1 Before the Independent Hearings Panel In the Matter of the Resource Management Act 1991 And In the Matter of the Canterbury Earthquake (Christchurch Replacement District Plan) Order 2014 And In the Matter of the Proposed Christchurch Replacement Plan (Chapter 14: Residential) Brief of evidence of Trevor William Watt for Ngāi Tahu Property Limited [840 and FS 1375] Dated: 20 March 2015 179 Victoria Street PO Box 13149 Christchurch Solicitor Acting: A C Dewar/ J E Walsh Phone: 03 379 3720 Fax: 03 379 8370 Email: [email protected] NGA72191 4255333.1 NGA72191:4192373 Evidence of Trevor Watt with appendices 840 Ngai Tahu Property page 2 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................1 SCOPE OF EVIDENCE...........................................................................................1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................2 WIGRAM CONTROL TOWER ...............................................................................4 WIGRAM HANGARS 4 & 5…………………...........................................................5 IMPLICATIONS & ASSESSMENT.........................................................................7 NGA72191 4255333.1 NGA72191:4192373 Evidence of Trevor Watt with appendices 840 Ngai Tahu Property page 3 2 INTRODUCTION Qualifications and experience 1. My full name is Trevor William Watt. I am a graduate
    [Show full text]
  • Reconnection to Cleared Site in Christchurch Architecture for the Rememberer
    Reconnection to Cleared Site in Christchurch Architecture for the Rememberer Abigail Michelle Thompson A thesis submitted in ful! lment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Architecture (professional), The University of Auckland, 2012 Fig 1: Project. Surface study model by author. Abstract The loss of life and buildings due to the devastating and continuing earthquakes in Canterbury (since 9th September, 2010) have created a need to examine the issue of memory with concerns to architecture in a New Zealand context. This thesis was initiated with concern to addressing the cleared (destroyed, demolished) buildings of Christchurch and architecture’s role in reconnecting Cantabrians mnemonically to the cleared sites in their city. This is an investigation of architecture’s ability to trigger memories in order to speci! cally address the disorientation experienced by Cantabrians subsequent to the loss of built fabric in their city. The design intention is to propose an architectural method for reconnecting people’s memories with site, which will have implications to other sites throughout the city of Christchurch. Consequently, two signi! cant sites of destruction have been chosen, the Methodist Church site at 309 Durham St (community) and the house at 69 Sherborne St (domestic). With the only original material left on these cleared sites being the ground itself, two issues were made apparent. Firstly, that ground should play a signi! cant role in substantiating the memory of the site(s), and secondly the necessary task of designing a mnemonic language without tangible links (other than ground). Collective memory is examined with regards to theory by Maurice Halbwachs, Piere Nora, and Peter Carrier.
    [Show full text]
  • Unsettling Recovery: Natural Disaster Response and the Politics of Contemporary Settler Colonialism
    UNSETTLING RECOVERY: NATURAL DISASTER RESPONSE AND THE POLITICS OF CONTEMPORARY SETTLER COLONIALISM A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY STEVEN ANDREW KENSINGER IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DR. DAVID LIPSET, ADVISER JULY 2019 Steven Andrew Kensinger, 2019 © Acknowledgements The fieldwork on which this dissertation is based was funded by a Doctoral Dissertation Fieldwork Grant No. 8955 awarded by the Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research. I also want to thank Dr. Robert Berdahl and the Berdahl family for endowing the Daphne Berdahl Memorial Fellowship which provided funds for two preliminary fieldtrips to New Zealand in preparation for the longer fieldwork period. I also received funding while in the field from the University of Minnesota Graduate School through a Thesis Research Travel Grant. I want to thank my advisor, Dr. David Lipset, and the members of my dissertation committee, Dr. Hoon Song, Dr. David Valentine, and Dr. Margaret Werry for their help and guidance in preparing the dissertation. In the Department of Anthropology at the University of Minnesota, Dr. William Beeman, Dr. Karen Ho, and Dr. Karen-Sue Taussig offered personal and professional support. I am grateful to Dr. Kieran McNulty for offering me a much-needed funding opportunity in the final stages of dissertation writing. A special thanks to my colleagues Dr. Meryl Puetz-Lauer and Dr. Timothy Gitzen for their support and encouragement. Dr. Carol Lauer graciously offered to read and comment on several of the chapters. My fellow graduate students and writing-accountability partners Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Christchurch Street Names: B
    Christchurch Street Names B Current name Former name Origin of name Suburb Additional information See Source Further information Badger Street Named after Ronald Parklands Badger was a real estate Sylvia Street Information supplied "The property Smith Badger agent and a landowner in by Richard Greenaway market", The Press, (1880?-1946). New Brighton. in 2008. 19 October 1918, p 10 First appears in street directories in 1928. “Obituary, Mr R. S. Badger”, The Press, 18 September 1946, p 5 Baffin Street Named after Baffin Wainoni One of a number of streets Huron Street, “Chester Street West or “Tunnel’s first blast Island in the Arctic in a subdivision between Niagara Street, Cranmer Terrace?”, celebrated”, The Ocean of Northern Ottawa Road, Pages Road Ontario Place, The Press, 28 April Press, 22 July 2011, Canada. and Cuffs Road given Quebec Place, 1959, p 7 p A7 Canadian place names. Vancouver Information supplied in Crescent and Named because Canadian 2005 by Tim Baker in Winnipeg Place. engineers and workers an interview with Also Ottawa lived in the area while Margaret Harper. Road. working for Henry J. Kaiser Co of USA and building the Lyttelton road tunnel. Houses were built for them by Fletcher Construction. After the tunnel was opened in 1964, the Canadians went home and their houses were sold to locals. © Christchurch City Libraries February 2016 Page 1 of 172 Christchurch Street Names B Current name Former name Origin of name Suburb Additional information See Source Further information OR Named because they were near Ottawa Road. Named in 1959. Baigent Way Named after Steve Middleton Baigent was a former Riccarton/Wigram Baigent.
    [Show full text]
  • The Correspondence of Julius Haast and Joseph Dalton Hooker, 1861-1886
    The Correspondence of Julius Haast and Joseph Dalton Hooker, 1861-1886 Sascha Nolden, Simon Nathan & Esme Mildenhall Geoscience Society of New Zealand miscellaneous publication 133H November 2013 Published by the Geoscience Society of New Zealand Inc, 2013 Information on the Society and its publications is given at www.gsnz.org.nz © Copyright Simon Nathan & Sascha Nolden, 2013 Geoscience Society of New Zealand miscellaneous publication 133H ISBN 978-1-877480-29-4 ISSN 2230-4495 (Online) ISSN 2230-4487 (Print) We gratefully acknowledge financial assistance from the Brian Mason Scientific and Technical Trust which has provided financial support for this project. This document is available as a PDF file that can be downloaded from the Geoscience Society website at: http://www.gsnz.org.nz/information/misc-series-i-49.html Bibliographic Reference Nolden, S.; Nathan, S.; Mildenhall, E. 2013: The Correspondence of Julius Haast and Joseph Dalton Hooker, 1861-1886. Geoscience Society of New Zealand miscellaneous publication 133H. 219 pages. The Correspondence of Julius Haast and Joseph Dalton Hooker, 1861-1886 CONTENTS Introduction 3 The Sumner Cave controversy Sources of the Haast-Hooker correspondence Transcription and presentation of the letters Acknowledgements References Calendar of Letters 8 Transcriptions of the Haast-Hooker letters 12 Appendix 1: Undated letter (fragment), ca 1867 208 Appendix 2: Obituary for Sir Julius von Haast 209 Appendix 3: Biographical register of names mentioned in the correspondence 213 Figures Figure 1: Photographs
    [Show full text]
  • Gccrs Panel Bios
    GCCRS PANEL BIOS Alan Dallas CPEng CMEngNZ Alan was at an engineering forensics and seismic assessment seminar in the Christchurch CBD on 22 February 2011, subsequently serving as a CBD building assessor and team leader. He joined Batchelar McDougall Consulting (BMC) in August 2011 and has since worked on the assessment and repair of a range of buildings. Alan also flew to Kaikoura on 15 November 2016 to inspect buildings and bridges. Ana Pereira CPEng Ana is civil engineer with a geotechnical specialization, with over 10 years of experience in the geotechnical field. In Portugal, Ana was a site engineer managing construction of piles, micropiles and anchors for many different developments. These included residential and commercial buildings, roads and railways in different geological settings, including alluvial soils near waterways. She also managed several excavations for underground car parking in urban areas. Her experience in New Zealand, from 2012 onwards, is based on seismic hazard assessment, foundation, ground improvement design and slope stability analysis for residential and commercial buildings and bridges. Andrew Marriott CPEng CMEngNZ IntPE(NZ) Andrew has more than 30 years’ experience in structural and civil engineering, including designing a wide range of structures in New Zealand and the United Kingdom. He is currently a Principal and Director of Batchelar McDougall Consulting. Andrew has specialised in heritage engineering and temporary works designs as well as maintaining his competency in general structures ranging from residential through to multi-storey commercial developments. Andrew volunteered for Civil Defence as a Chartered Professional Engineer following the 22 February 2011 Christchurch earthquake and was lead engineer in the heritage area.
    [Show full text]
  • DX Times Master Page Copy
    N.Z. RADIO New Zealand DX Times N.Z. RADIO Monthly journal of the D X New Zealand Radio DX League (est. 1948) D X April 2003 - Volume 55 Number 6 LEAGUE http://radiodx.com LEAGUE . As Radio Hobbyists (DX’ers or Listeners) we are able to tune into Shortwave broadcasts from countries involved in the Iraqi conflict or neighbouring countries. Whether you agree or disagree with what has occurred, we are fortunate to be able to listen to those differing viewpoints and make up our own minds. You will find a list of English Broadcast frequencies from countries involved in the Iraqi conflict and its neighbours, compiled by Paul Ormandy on page 17, plus the normal ‘Unofficial Radio’ ‘Under 9’ & ‘Over 9’ Bandwatch columns and ‘Shortwave Report’ Contribution deadline for next issue is Wed 7th May 2003 PO Box 3011, Auckland Some of the International Broadcasters also CONTENTS have thought provoking comments or editorials about the conflict such as the editorial by Andy Sennitt on REGULAR COLUMNS the Radio Netherlands website at Bandwatch Under 9 3 http://www.rnw.nl/realradio/features/html/editorial.html with Ken Baird The Iraqi conflict has also shown that Bandwatch Over 9 6 Shortwave Radio is still a powerful tool, for general with Andy McQueen news and discussion and also as a Propaganda Shortwave Report 10 with Ian Cattermole outlet. English in Time Order 20 An interesting article as mentioned in the with Yuri Muzyka Unofficial Radio pages concerning Commando Solo Shortwave Mailbag 23 missions by the U.S. Air Force EC-130E aircraft and with Paul Ormandy other special forces broadcasts is on the dxing.info Utilities 25 website at.
    [Show full text]
  • Palmerston North Radio Stations
    Palmerston North Radio Stations Frequency Station Location Format Whanganui (Bastia Hill) Mainstream Radio 87.6 FM and Palmerston rock(1990s- 2018 Hauraki North (Wharite) 2010s) Palmerston Full service iwi 89.8 FM Kia Ora FM Unknown Unknown North (Wharite) radio Palmerston Contemporary 2QQ, Q91 FM, 90.6 FM ZM 1980s North (Wharite) hits ZMFM Palmerston Christian 91.4 FM Rhema FM Unknown North (Wharite) contemporary Palmerston Adult 92.2 FM More FM 1986 2XS FM North (Wharite) contemporary Palmerston Contemporary 93.0 FM The Edge 1998 Country FM North (Wharite) Hit Radio Palmerston 93.8 FM Radio Live Talk Radio Unknown Radio Pacific North (Wharite) Palmerston 94.6 FM The Sound Classic Rock Unknown Solid Gold FM North (Wharite) Palmerston 95.4 FM The Rock Rock Unknown North (Wharite) Palmerston Hip Hop and 97.0 FM Mai FM Unknown North (Wharite) RnB Classic Hits Palmerston Adult 97.8 FM The Hits 1938 97.8 ZAFM, North (Wharite) contemporary 98FM, 2ZA Palmerston 98.6 FM The Breeze Easy listening 2006 Magic FM North (Wharite) Palmerston North Radio Stations Frequency Station Location Format Radio Palmerston 99.4 FM Campus radio Unknown Radio Massey Control North (Wharite) Palmerston 104.2 FM Magic Oldies 2014 Magic FM North (Wharite) Vision 100 Palmerston 105.0 FM Various radio Unknown Unknown FM North (Kahuterawa) Palmerston Pop music (60s- 105.8 FM Coast 2018 North (Kahuterawa) 1970s) 107.1 FM George FM Palmerston North Dance Music Community 2XS, Bright & Radio Easy, Classic 828 AM Trackside / Palmerston North TAB Unknown Hits, Magic, TAB The Breeze Access Triple Access Community Nine, 999 AM Palmerston North Unknown Manawatu radio Manawatu Sounz AM Pop Palmerston 1548 AM Mix music (1980s- 2005 North (Kahuterawa) 1990s) Palmerston North Radio Stations New Zealand Low Power FM Radio Station Database (Current List Settings) Broadcast Area: Palmerston North Order: Ascending ( A-Z ) Results: 5 Stations Listed.
    [Show full text]
  • Bays Area Community Directory 2020
    BAYS AREA COMMUNITY DIRECTORY 2020 1 | P a g e Proudly supported by Contents Welcome to the 2020 edition of the Bays Area Community Directory ............... 3 Emergency Information .............................................................................................. 4 Local Emergency Services ...................................................................................... 4 Community Response Teams.................................................................................. 5 Christchurch Hospital ............................................................................................... 5 After Hours Medical Care ........................................................................................ 5 Natural disasters ........................................................................................................ 5 Defibrillator Locations............................................................................................... 9 How to Stay Informed - Radio ............................................................................... 10 Notes about this directory ........................................................................................ 11 Key local organisations .......................................................................................... 11 Charitable Status .................................................................................................... 11 Public interest/good ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]