DOCSLIB.ORG

Observation of Air Showers with the Iceact 7 Pixel Demonstrator in Coincidence with Icecube and Icetop

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Observation of Air Showers with the Iceact 7 Pixel Demonstrator in Coincidence with Icecube and Icetop Observation of air showers with the IceAct 7 pixel demonstrator in coincidence with IceCube and IceTop von Erik Ganster Masterarbeit in Physik Vorgelegt der Fakultät für Mathematik, Informatik und Naturwissenschaften der Rheinisch-Westfälischen Technischen Hochschule Aachen im Oktober 2018 angefertigt am III. Physikalischen Institut B Univ.-Prof. Dr. Christopher Wiebusch revised version, January 2019 Betreuer Dr. Jan Auenberg III. Physikalisches Institut B RWTH Aachen Erstgutachter Univ.-Prof. Dr. Christopher Wiebusch III. Physikalisches Institut B RWTH Aachen Zweitgutachter Dr. Andreas Haungs Institute for Nuclear Physics Karlsruhe Institute of Technology iii iv Contents 1 Introduction1 2 Cosmic Rays3 2.1 Energy Spectrum . .3 2.2 Air Showers . .5 2.3 Cherenkov Light . .7 3 The IceCube Neutrino Observatory 11 3.1 The IceCube In-Ice Array . 12 3.2 The surface detector IceTop . 16 3.3 IceCube-Gen2 . 17 4 The IceAct Telescope 19 4.1 Mechanical structure/design . 21 4.2 Camera and Optics . 22 4.3 Silicon Photomultiplier (SiPM) . 25 4.4 The IceAct demonstrator at South Pole . 29 4.4.1 Camera . 30 4.4.2 Data Acquisition System . 32 4.4.3 Telescope Operation . 34 5 Coincident Data Taking with IceAct and IceCube 37 5.1 Connection between IceAct and IceCube . 37 5.2 Method of Time Synchronization . 39 5.3 Time Synchronization Results . 41 6 Analysis of Coincident Events 45 6.1 Analysis methods . 45 6.1.1 Software trigger . 45 6.1.2 Signal Extraction . 47 v Contents 6.2 Event Selection . 48 6.2.1 IceAct Event Selection . 48 6.2.2 IceTop Event Selection . 54 6.2.3 IceCube Event Selection . 56 6.3 IceAct Telescope Performance . 59 6.3.1 Observing Cosmic Rays . 64 6.3.2 Energy threshold of the IceAct Telescope . 72 6.4 Correlation between IceAct and IceCube/IceTop . 74 7 Summary and Outlook 77 A Appendix 81 Bibliography 83 List of Figures 91 List of Tables 95 vi 1 Introduction For more than a decade scientists all over the world have searched for the origin of cosmic rays and tried to explain their acceleration mechanisms leading to energies of 1020 eV. The IceCube Neutrino Observatory is a 1 km3 lage neutrino telescope melted deep in the glacial ice at the geographic South Pole. It was built to search for very high energetic neutrinos of astrophysical origin. The identication of their sources could answer the question for the sources of high energy cosmic rays, since they are believed to be the same. An air shower surface detector called IceTop is located above the IceCube in- ice array. It measures cosmic rays and can be used as a veto for cosmic ray induced muons and neutrinos that are the main background in IceCube's search for astrophysical neutrinos. A larger air shower detector on the surface is part of the Gen-2 extension of Ice- Cube. These surface detector should improve the veto capabilities of IceTop as well as the investigation of cosmic rays. One idea is the use of an array of small imaging air Cherenkov telescopes called IceAct. By observing an independent component of air showers, Cherenkov light, with a low energy threshold they could improve IceTop's com- position measurements and veto cosmic rays by using the whole atmosphere in their eld of view as an active volume. In order to demonstrate the capabilities of such an air Cherenkov telescope even in the harsh environments at South Pole, an IceAct telescope demonstrator was installed in December 2015. After a brief introduction to cosmic rays and the principle of Cherenkov radiation an introduction to the IceCube Neutrino Observatory is given. The concept of Ice- Act telescopes is introduced followed by a chapter on how data is taken in coincidence with IceAct, IceCube and IceTop. The focus of this thesis is the analysis of coincident events recorded with all three detectors in 2016 proong a successful operation of an air Cherenkov telescope at South Pole and its dierent capabilities: vetoing cosmic ray air showers, composition measurements together with IceTop and energy calibration for IceTop. Parts of this thesis will be published in a paper on the design and performance of the rst IceAct demonstrator at South Pole. 1 1 Introduction 2 2 Cosmic Rays Cosmic ray is a collective term for charged particles or nuclei that traverse through the interstellar medium, reach Earth and enter atmosphere. During balloon ights in 1912 Victor Hess observed a faster discharge of electroscopes with increasing altitude [1]. He correctly concluded that the ionization of air must increase with altitude causing the electroscopes to lose their charge faster. This ionization is caused by cosmic rays hitting the atmosphere and producing secondary charged particles in extensive air showers. The origin of cosmic rays reaching energies of more than 1020 eV (gure 2.1) is still unknown, as well as mechanisms accelerating particles to these energies or their sources. This chapter will give an introduction to cosmic rays and their well measured energy spectrum. It describes how air showers evolve in the atmosphere and what eect is used to measure these air showers at highest energies. 2.1 Energy Spectrum The dierential energy spectrum of cosmic rays is shown in gure 2.1. Measurements of dierent experiments are combined to cover an energy range from 1013 eV to 1020 eV. The dierential ux, or number of particles, of cosmic rays is given in units of 1=(GeV m2 s sr). The spectrum follows a power law of the form: dN / Eγ : (2.1) dE To point out three important features of the spectrum it is often multiplied by a factor of Ex. In gure 2.1, it is multiplied with a factor of E2:6 and its main features (knee, 2nd knee and ankle) are marked. Direct measurements of cosmic rays are feasible up to energies of about 100 TeV. For higher energies large detection areas are required to collect a suitable number of events in a reasonable time. The power law behavior causes the rate to heavily decrease from more than 1000 particles per second and square meter at GeV energies to about one particle per square meter and year at PeV.[2] 3 2 Cosmic Rays Figure 2.1: Energy spectrum of cosmic rays. Flux measurements of dierent experi- ments are shown. The spectrum is multiplied by E2:6 to point out its features: knee, 2nd knee and ankle. Taken from [3]. A steepening of the spectrum occurring between 1015 eV to 1016 eV is called knee (gure 2.1). At the knee the spectral index γ of equation (2.1) changes from ≈ −2:7 to ≈ −3:1, a softening of the spectrum. Energy and ux measurements of cosmic rays at the knee and beyond rely on indirect measurements of secondary particles produced in air showers (section 2.2) by ground based instruments.[2, 4] A second, further softening of the spectrum at about 4 × 1017 eV is called 2nd knee. At about 4 × 1018 eV the spectrum recovers to a spectral index of ≈ −2:7 again as can easily be seen in gure 2.1. This transition is called ankle. Event rates lower than one particle per square kilometer and century above 100 EeV requires huge detectors for measurements. The worlds largest detector for cosmic rays is the Pierre Auger Cosmic Ray Observatory in the Province of Mendoza, Argentina, covering an area of ≈ 3000 km2 [5].[2] 4 2.2 Air Showers Dierent models have been evolved to explain the knee and the ankle in the cosmic rays' energy spectrum. Common explanations uses dierent acceleration mechanisms and origins to describe these features. Knee and 2nd is associated with an upper limit of acceleration in galactic sources like supernova remnants and dierent compositions from light particles to heavy nuclei. The ankle, on the other hand, is the onset of an extra galactic component with a harder spectrum compared to galactic sources.[2, 6] An interaction of very high energetic cosmic rays with photons from the cosmic mi- crowave background (CMB) called GZK-cuto would lead to a hard cuto in the en- ergy spectrum at about 6 × 1019 eV. The GZK-cuto is driven by production of a ∆+- resonance: p + γ ! ∆+ ! p + π0 ! n + π+ : It was introduced and rst calculated by K. Greisen, G. T. Zatsepin and V. A. Kuzmin in 1966 giving it the name GZK-cuto shortly after the CMB was discovered by A. Penzias and R. Wilson [79]. 2.2 Air Showers Primaries of the cosmic rays will produce so called air showers when they hit Earth's atmosphere and interact with air nuclei. Such air showers can be divided into two categories (or parts): electromagnetic and hadronic showers. A simple model for the description of processes in electromagnetic showers was introduced by W. Heitler in 1954 and can be expanded to hadronic cascades. The model cannot replace fully detailed simulations of the processes inside an air shower, especially for hadronic ones, but it describes the most important features fairly well. The Heitler model for electromagnetic and its adapted version for hadronic showers is shown in gure 2.2 and shall be discussed in more detail.[10, 11] The left side of gure 2.2 shows an electromagnetic shower induced by a primary high energy photon. In a rst step the photon produces an electron-positron pair. Each elec- tron and positron will radiate a single photon by bremsstrahlung after traveling a certain distance in the atmosphere. In both cases the energy is assumed to be equally divided between both outgoing particles. Both processes, pair production and bremsstrahlung repeats several times and form an electromagnetic cascade of high energetic particles.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Branching Model for Hadronic Air Showers Vladimir Novotny
    A branching model for hadronic air showers Vladimir Novotny∗ Charles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Institute of Particle and Nuclear Physics, Prague, Czech Republic E-mail: [email protected] Dalibor Nosek Charles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Institute of Particle and Nuclear Physics, Prague, Czech Republic E-mail: [email protected] Jan Ebr Institute of Physics of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic E-mail: [email protected] We introduce a simple branching model for the development of hadronic showers in the Earth’s atmosphere. Based on this model, we show how the size of the pionic component followed by muons can be estimated. Several aspects of the subsequent muonic component are also discussed. We focus on the energy evolution of the muon production depth. We also estimate the impact of the primary particle mass on the size of the hadronic component. Even though a precise calcu- lation of the development of air showers must be left to complex Monte Carlo simulations, the proposed model can reveal qualitative insight into the air shower physics. arXiv:1509.00364v1 [astro-ph.HE] 1 Sep 2015 The 34th International Cosmic Ray Conference, 30 July- 6 August, 2015 The Hague, The Netherlands ∗Speaker. c Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike Licence. http://pos.sissa.it/ A branching model for hadronic air showers Vladimir Novotny 1. Introduction We study a hadronic component of extensive air showers. Key parameters that we want to determine are a shape of a muonic subshower profile and an atmospheric depth of its maximum µ µ (Xmax).
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation on Gamma-Electron Air Shower Separation for CTA
    Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv The Faculty of Physics Astronomy and Space Physics Department Investigation on gamma-electron air shower separation for CTA Field of study: 0701 { physics Speciality: 8.04020601 { astronomy Specialisation: astrophysics Master's thesis the second year master student Iryna Lypova Supervisor: Dr. Gernot Maier leader of Helmholtz-University Young Investigator Group at DESY and Humboldt University (Berlin) Kyiv, 2013 Contents Introduction 2 1 Extensive air showers 3 1.1 Electromagnetic showers . 3 1.2 Hadronic showers . 7 1.3 Cherenkov radiation . 11 2 Cherenkov technique 13 2.1 Cherenkov telescopes . 13 2.2 Cherenkov Telescope Array . 18 2.3 Air shower reconstruction . 24 3 γ-electron separation with telescope arrays 31 3.1 Hybrid array . 31 3.2 The Cherenkov Telescope Array . 39 Summary 42 Reference 44 Appendix A 47 Appendix B 50 Introduction Very high energy (VHE) ground-based γ-ray astrophysics is a quite young science. The earth atmosphere absorbs gamma-rays and direct detection is possible only with satellite or balloon experiments. The flux of gamma rays falls rapidly with increasing energy and satellite detectors become not effective anymore due to the limited collection area. Another possibility for gamma- ray detection is usage of Imaging Atmospheric Cherenkov telescopes. The primary γ-ray creates a cascade of the secondary particles which move through the atmosphere. The charged component of the cascade which moves with velocities faster the light in the air, emits Cherenkov light which can be detected by the ground based optical detectors. The ground based gamma astronomy was pioneered by the 10 m single Cherenkov telescope WHIPPLE (1968) [1] in Arizona.
    [Show full text]
  • Astro-Particle Physics: Imaging Air Cherenkov Telescopes (Iacts)
    IceAct: Cosmic Ray Air Cherenkov telescopes as an upgrade to the IceCube Neutrino Observatory at the South Pole Larissa Paul, Anna AbadSantos, Antonio Banda, Aine Grady, Sean McLaughlin, Matthias Plum and Karen Andeen Department of Physics, Marquette University, Milwaukee WI, USA Student researchers Astro-particle physics: Imaging Air Cherenkov Telescopes (IACTs): Testing epoxy for the use at the South Pole: at work • Cosmic rays - Particles Source? IACTs detect Cherenkov light produced in the atmosphere by air showers: this The IceAct cameras consist of 61 PMMA Winston cones (WCs) glued onto the with the highest known allows us to study the purely electromagnetic component of the air shower with glass of 61 SiPMs with epoxy. The epoxy used in previous versions of the energy in the universe excellent energy and mass resolution prototype was not cold-rated, causing rapid degradation of the camera at Polar • Discovered in 1912, still a • technique is complementary to the particle detectors already in place at the temperatures. A reliable cold-rated epoxy is vital to ensure many years South Pole of successful data taking. the IceAct lot of unknowns: camera • What are cosmic rays? • will allow us to significantly improve several measurements that we are • What are the astrophysical sources of cosmic interested in through: We are testing two different cold-rated epoxies for rays? • cross-calibrations of the different detector components against each other long-term reliability and reproducibility: • How are they accelerated? • reconstruction of events with different detector configurations • Goal #1: release equal amounts of epoxy drops • Air showers onto each SiPM. Cascades of secondary particles generated by cosmic IceAct: • Problem: viscosity of epoxy changes with time exposed to air, causing the ray particles interacting with the earth's atmosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Extensive Air Showers and Ultra High-Energy Cosmic Rays: a Historical Review
    EPJ manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Extensive Air Showers and Ultra High-Energy Cosmic Rays: A Historical Review Karl-Heinz Kampert1;a and Alan A Watson2;b 1 Department of Physics, University Wuppertal, Germany 2 School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leeds, UK Abstract. The discovery of extensive air showers by Rossi, Schmeiser, Bothe, Kolh¨orsterand Auger at the end of the 1930s, facilitated by the coincidence technique of Bothe and Rossi, led to fundamental con- tributions in the field of cosmic ray physics and laid the foundation for high-energy particle physics. Soon after World War II a cosmic ray group at MIT in the USA pioneered detailed investigations of air shower phenomena and their experimental skill laid the foundation for many of the methods and much of the instrumentation used today. Soon in- terests focussed on the highest energies requiring much larger detectors to be operated. The first detection of air fluorescence light by Japanese and US groups in the early 1970s marked an important experimental breakthrough towards this end as it allowed huge volumes of atmo- sphere to be monitored by optical telescopes. Radio observations of air showers, pioneered in the 1960s, are presently experiencing a renais- sance and may revolutionise the field again. In the last 7 decades the research has seen many ups but also a few downs. However, the exam- ple of the Cygnus X-3 story demonstrated that even non-confirmable observations can have a huge impact by boosting new instrumentation to make discoveries and shape an entire scientific community.
    [Show full text]
  • Detection Techniques of Radio Emission from Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays
    Detection Techniques of Radio Emission from Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Chad M. Morris, B.S. Graduate Program in Physics The Ohio State University 2009 Dissertation Committee: Prof. James J. Beatty, Adviser Prof. John F. Beacom Prof. Richard J. Furnstahl Prof. Richard E. Hughes c Copyright by Chad M. Morris 2009 Abstract We discuss recent and future efforts to detect radio signals from extended air showers at the Pierre Auger Observatory in Malarg¨ue, Argentina. With the advent of low-cost, high-performance digitizers and robust digital signal processing software techniques, radio detection of cosmic rays has resurfaced as a promising measure- ment system. The inexpensive nature of the detector media (metallic wires, rods or parabolic dishes) and economies of scale working in our favor (inexpensive high- quality C-band amplifiers and receivers) make an array of radio antennas an appealing alternative to the expense of deploying an array of Cherenkov detector water tanks or ‘fly’s eye’ optical telescopes for fluorescence detection. The calorimetric nature of the detection and the near 100% duty cycle gives the best of both traditional detection techniques. The history of cosmic ray detection detection will be discussed. A short review on the astrophysical properties of cosmic rays and atmospheric interactions will lead into a discussion of two radio emission channels that are currently being investigated. ii This dissertation is dedicated to my wife, Nichole, who has tolerated and even encouraged my ramblings for longer than I can remember.
    [Show full text]
  • Pos(ICRC2019)270 B † 15%
    Air-Shower Reconstruction at the Pierre Auger Observatory based on Deep Learning PoS(ICRC2019)270 Jonas Glombitza∗a for the Pierre Auger Collaboration yb aRWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany bObservatorio Pierre Auger, Av. San Martín Norte 304, 5613 Malargüe, Argentina E-mail: [email protected] Full author list: http://www.auger.org/archive/authors_icrc_2019.html The surface detector array of the Pierre Auger Observatory measures the footprint of air show- ers induced by ultra-high energy cosmic rays. The reconstruction of event-by-event information sensitive to the cosmic-ray mass, is a challenging task and so far mainly based on fluorescence detector observations with their duty cycle of ≈ 15%. Recently, great progress has been made in multiple fields of machine learning using deep neural networks and associated techniques. Apply- ing these new techniques to air-shower physics opens up possibilities for improved reconstruction, including an estimation of the cosmic-ray composition. In this contribution, we show that deep convolutional neural networks can be used for air-shower reconstruction, using surface-detector data. The focus of the machine-learning algorithm is to reconstruct depths of shower maximum. In contrast to traditional reconstruction methods, the algorithm learns to extract the essential in- formation from the signal and arrival-time distributions of the secondary particles. We present the neural-network architecture, describe the training, and assess the performance using simulated air showers. 36th International Cosmic Ray Conference — ICRC2019 24 July – 1 August, 2019 Madison, Wisconsin, USA ∗Speaker. yfor collaboration list see PoS(ICRC2019)1177 c Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Atmosphere As a Calorimeter for UHE Cosmic Rays
    SLAC Summer Institute on Particle Physics (SSI04), Aug. 2-13, 2004 Understanding the Atmosphere as a Calorimeter for UHE Cosmic Rays Gerd Schatz∗ Fakultat¨ f¨ur Physik, Universitat¨ Heidelberg This contribution discusses the methods to measure the energies of cosmic rays at the extreme upper end of the spectrum. After a short introduction to calorimetry in high energy physics the most important features of extensive air showers (EASs) are described. An EAS is the phenomenon which develops when a high energy particle enters the atmosphere of the Earth. The two methods of determining the energy in the range where ground based detectors have to be used are then described. The contribution ends with listing some of the unsolved problems in the field. 1. Introduction The observational evidence for ultra high energy cosmic rays and possible ways for accelerating them have been discussed extensively by T. Stanev [1] and R. Blanford [2], respectively. It is the purpose of this contribution to describe and critically review the methods for determining the energy of cosmic ray particles in the energy range where direct detection from high flying balloons or satellites is no more possible and ground-based detector systems have to be used. Any particle entering the atmosphere of the Earth from space is characterized by the following 8 parameters position, direction, time, energy, particle kind The last item is a discrete parameter determining mass and charge of the incident particle. When these parameters have been measured we know everything we can ever hope to know about it. The 6 observables in the first line can be measured with reasonable accuracy and do not present any serious problem.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Shower Physics
    Air shower physics SHINE autumn school 27. 10. 2020 Felix Riehn Universidad de Santiago de Compostela / LIP What are air showers? Proton, 100 TeV (simulation) Air shower == cascade of Particle interactions in atmosphere particles hadrons 2 Created by …? Astrophysics: Origin of features ? Acceleration ? Cosmic rays (Unger 2006) 3 Indirect (air showers) Particle physics: ect dir (Engel 2019) CRs through extensive air showers air shower physics (want to know): CR interaction - Astrophysics (primary particle) Energy, mass, direction - Particle physics (primary interaction) multiplicity, cross section … Observables ?? 4 CR air shower observables * particles at (under)ground * energy deposit along path 5 Example: Pierre Auger Observatory Both! (Hybrid measurement) 6 Related to primary? Air shower development: the start CR particle UHE interaction (~100 TeV) ● Hadronic! ● Exotic? ● Black holes? ● UHE secondaries (~100 TeV) Fireball? ● Chiral symmetry? ● Pions, kaons, charmed ... ● New (exotic) particles? ● Lorentz invariance? EAS according to SM ?? 7 EAS according to the Standard Model CR proton Hadronic interaction: Successive interactions: EM cascade hadronic cascade 8 EM cascade Equal sharing of energy All with same interaction Ionisation (continuous length Pair creation Bremsstrahlung energy loss) Multiplicity: 2 Until continuous energy loss dominant Generation 1 ‘generation z’ Generation 2 Etc. 9 Hadronic cascade CR proton Assume pions only Equal sharing of energy Multiplicity: fixed (Matthews 2005) Until pions likely decay 10 Hadronic
    [Show full text]
  • Observation of Inclined Eev Air Showers with the Radio Detector of the Pierre Auger Observatory
    Published in JCAP as DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2018/10/026 Observation of inclined EeV air showers with the radio detector of the Pierre Auger Observatory A. Aab,75 P. Abreu,67 M. Aglietta,49,48 I.F.M. Albuquerque,18 J.M. Albury,12 I. Allekotte,1 A. Almela,8,11 J. Alvarez Castillo,63 J. Alvarez-Muñiz,74 G.A. Anastasi,40,42 L. Anchordoqui,81 B. Andrada,8 S. Andringa,67 C. Aramo,46 N. Arsene,69 H. Asorey,1,26 P. Assis,67 G. Avila,9,10 A.M. Badescu,70 A. Balaceanu,68 F. Barbato,56,46 R.J. Barreira Luz,67 S. Baur,35 K.H. Becker,33 J.A. Bellido,12 C. Berat,32 M.E. Bertaina,58,48 X. Bertou,1 P.L. Biermann,b J. Biteau,30 S.G. Blaess,12 A. Blanco,67 J. Blazek,28 C. Bleve,52,44 M. Boháčová,28 C. Bonifazi,23 N. Borodai,64 A.M. Botti,8,35 J. Brack,f T. Bretz,37 A. Bridgeman,34 F.L. Briechle,37 P. Buchholz,39 A. Bueno,73 S. Buitink,75 M. Buscemi,54,43 K.S. Caballero-Mora,62 L. Caccianiga,55 L. Calcagni,4 A. Cancio,11,8 F. Canfora,75,77 J.M. Carceller,73 R. Caruso,54,43 A. Castellina,49,48 F. Catalani,16 G. Cataldi,44 L. Cazon,67 J.A. Chinellato,19 J. Chudoba,28 L. Chytka,29 R.W. Clay,12 A.C. Cobos Cerutti,7 R. Colalillo,56,46 A. Coleman,86 L. Collica,48 M.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2108.07164V1 [Astro-Ph.HE] 16 Aug 2021
    ICRC 2021 THE ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS CONFERENCE ONLINE ICRC 2021Berlin | Germany THE ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS CONFERENCE th Berlin37 International| Germany Cosmic Ray Conference 12–23 July 2021 Cosmic-Ray Studies with the Surface Instrumentation of IceCube Andreas Haungs for the IceCube Collaboration 0Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute for Astroparticle Physics, Germany E-mail: [email protected] IceCube is a cubic-kilometer Cherenkov detector installed in deep ice at the geographic South Pole. IceCube’s surface array, IceTop, measures the electromagnetic signal and mainly low-energy muons from extensive air showers above several 100 TeV primary energy, with shower bundles and high-energy muons detected by the in-ice detector IceCube. In combination, the in-ice detector and IceTop provide unique opportunities to study cosmic rays in detail with large statistics. This contribution summarizes recent results from these studies. In addition, the IceCube-Upgrade will include a considerable enhancement of the surface detector through the installation of scintillation detectors and radio antennas and possibly small air-Cherenkov telescopes. We will discuss the results of the prototype detectors installed at the South Pole and the prospects of this enhancement as well as the surface array planned for IceCube-Gen2. Corresponding author and presenter: Andreas Haungs arXiv:2108.07164v1 [astro-ph.HE] 16 Aug 2021 37th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC 2021) July 12th – 23rd, 2021 Online – Berlin, Germany © Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). https://pos.sissa.it/ Cosmic-ray studies at IceCube 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Cosmic Rays and Extensive Air Showers
    Cosmic Rays and Extensive Air Showers Todor Stanev Bartol research Institute Department of Physics & Astronomy University of Delaware Cosmic rays are charged nuclei accelerated outside the solar system. At energies above 1 GeV most of the cosmic rays are accelerated in our Galaxy. In this energy range the cosmic ray flux is dominated by H nuclei, i.e. protons. The best way to study cosmic rays is to detect them outside the atmosphere and this is done in satellite and high energy balloon experiments such as AMS 1. This is not, however, always possible since the flux of cosmic rays is proportional to E-2.7. At energies above 100 TeV their flux is is so small that we have to study the cascades they generate in the atmosphere – the extensive air showers. EDS'09, CERN, July 2009 The equivalent Lab energy of the LHC is 2.108 GeV. The interpretation of the highest energy cosmic rays events thus requires a long range extension of the hadronic interaction models. EDS'09, CERN, July 2009 Air shower detection Three main methods: 1) air shower arrays observe shower structure on a single observation level. 2) Cherenkov light detectors: 1.5 degree cone around the particle track. 3) fluorescent light detectors: isotropic emission of about 4 photons per meter track. EDS'09, CERN, July 2009 It is important at this point to emphasize the fact that cosmic rays experiments are actually observations. When we analyze these observations we have no idea what the beam is, neither in energy or in the type of the cosmic ray nucleus – it could be either a proton or a Fe nucleus.
    [Show full text]
  • Extensive Air Showers and Particle Physics
    Extensive Air Showers and Particle Physics Todor Stanev Bartol Research Institute Dept Physics and Astronomy University of Delaware Extensive air showers are the cascades that develop in the atmosphere after interactions of the cosmic rays. In vertical direction (cos θ=1) the atmosphere has more than 12 interaction lengths. High energy cosmic rays can be studied only by the detection and interpretation of the EAS. We need very good knowledge of the minimum bias physics for interpretation of the EAS results. We shall concentrate on the highest energy cosmic rays. Their analysis requires knowledge of the particle interactions at energies significantly higher than LHC. This is not a new problem. This is how it developed: John Linsley (PRL 10 (1963) 146) reports on the detection in Vulcano Ranch of an air shower of energy above 1020 eV. 1020 eV = = 2.4x1034 Hz 8 Problem: the microwave background = 1.6x10 erg = 170 km/h radiation is discovered in 1965. Greisen tennis ball and Zatseping&Kuzmin independently derived the absorption of UHE protons in √s equivalent is photoproduction interactions on the 430 TeV 3K background. More problems: such detections continue, the current world statistics is around 10 events The cosmic ray energy spectrum covers many orders of magnitude. Different experiments measure from kinetic energy in MeV to above 1011 GeV, i.e. sqrt(s) = 433 TeV. We have to extend the hadronic interaction models to a factor of 50 over LHC to be able to analyze these events. Shower profile of the highest energy shower detected by the Fly's Eye experiment.
    [Show full text]