Google: Online Search & the Battle for Clicks

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Google: Online Search & the Battle for Clicks SLOAN FELLOWS PROGRAM IN INNOVATION & GLOBAL LEADERSHIP Google: Online Search & the Battle for Clicks May 1, 2005 Prepared by: Priya Iyer Brian Courtney Sloan Fellows ’05 i SLOAN FELLOWS PROGRAM IN INNOVATION & GLOBAL LEADERSHIP TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................................................1 2 SEARCH ENGINE INDUSTRY EVOLUTION .............................................................................................1 2.1 INDEXING – FINDING CONTENT...................................................................................................................2 2.2 QUALITY OF RESULTS .................................................................................................................................2 2.3 MARKET TRENDS ........................................................................................................................................4 3 STRUCTURE OF THE INDUSTRY ...............................................................................................................5 3.1 PORTER’S FIVE FORCES ANALYSIS..............................................................................................................5 3.2 SYSTEM MODEL ..........................................................................................................................................6 4 VALUE CAPTURE IN THE ONLINE SEARCH INDUSTRY.....................................................................9 4.1 VALUE CREATION VS. VALUE CAPTURE .....................................................................................................9 4.2 CRITICAL FACTORS OF VALUE CAPTURE ..................................................................................................11 4.3 VALUE CAPTURE ACROSS FIRMS -UNIQUENESS VS. COMPLEMENTARY ASSETS.......................................11 5 GOOGLE’S COMPETITIVE POSITION ....................................................................................................13 5.1 VALUE CHAIN ...........................................................................................................................................13 5.2 CREATING VALUE .....................................................................................................................................14 5.3 CAPTURING VALUE ...................................................................................................................................14 5.4 DELIVERING VALUE ..................................................................................................................................15 5.5 COMPETITIVE RESPONSE ...........................................................................................................................15 5.6 CREATION & CONTROL OF PROPRIETARY INDUSTRY STANDARDS ............................................................16 6 GOOGLE’S FUTURE STRATEGY ..............................................................................................................18 6.1 GROW CURRENT CONSUMER MARKETS....................................................................................................18 6.2 PROVIDE UBIQUITY ACROSS DEVICES .......................................................................................................19 6.3 EXPAND GLOBALLY ..................................................................................................................................19 6.4 PENETRATE ENTERPRISE MARKETS ..........................................................................................................19 6.5 BUILD NETWORKS & PARTNERSHIPS ........................................................................................................20 6.6 CONCLUSION.............................................................................................................................................20 7 APPENDIX .......................................................................................................................................................21 7.1 HISTORY OF SEARCH ENGINES AND DIRECTORIES ....................................................................................21 7.2 VALUE CAPTURE STRATEGY OF FOLLOWERS............................................................................................23 ii SLOAN FELLOWS PROGRAM IN INNOVATION & GLOBAL LEADERSHIP 1 Introduction Since the inception of the internet the user community has longed for complete and efficient access to the vast array of content on the web. This gave rise to an industry for search engines with players including Lycos, Yahoo!, Infoseek, AltaVista, Inktomi, Ask Jeeves, Google, and Northern Light. Competition revolved around relevance of search results and total indexed content. To find and index more sites, bots and spiders were created to tirelessly search the web. Search engines quickly learned that the vast majority of searches were for retail products. Google leveraged this to become the dominant channel for online advertisements. With billions of dollars at stake, search rank and ad placement became critical and hence highly profitable. Google has evolved from being a best-of-breed search engine to a destination site for a vast array of activities including eCommerce, email, blogging, maps, and much more. When Google went public in 2004 they were generating over a billion dollars a year in adverting revenue. In the battle for platforms, Microsoft is the unequivocal winner having crushed giants like IBM, Apple, Lotus, Netscape, etc. In the post-PC era, control of the platform matters only to the extent that it is one of the means of controlling the on-ramps to the Internet. The emerging battle is about capturing eye­ balls and mouse-clicks; where business models are based on on-line advertising revenue, sale of goods, subscriptions to content, and bundled broadband access1. This paper looks at how the search engine market evolved and how Google is on its way to become the dominant player. We will take a look at how value is created and captured within this market and what the system dynamics are for growth. In looking at the value chain, we will explore how competitive dynamics will evolve in the “battle for clicks”. Will Google win because its search-engine technology makes it the Internet portal of choice? Will Yahoo! manage to gain an advantage by being the most aggressive in acquiring content, e-commerce, and advertising properties on the internet? Or, perhaps it is impossible to beat Microsoft with its monopoly in the operating system platform. With this we will explore the future for the search market and discuss key factors for success. 2 Search Engine Industry Evolution The Internet and the World Wide Web (WWW) were radical innovations that sparked new channels and new forms of businesses. Though the Internet has been around since the 1960’s, Tim Berners Lee created the WWW in 1990. The WWW consist of two main components, a web server for publishing content, and web browsers for accessing content. Both internet browsers and web servers have 1 Battle for Clicks, Fuld & Company, 2005 1 SLOAN FELLOWS PROGRAM IN INNOVATION & GLOBAL LEADERSHIP been freely available since 1991. The evolution of the WWW was truly astonishing. From 26 known web sites in late 1992 to today where there are millions of web sites and billions of web pages. During this period of rapid growth many new products have been invented to help make the web easier to navigate and use; one of the most meaningful of these is the search engine. 2.1 Indexing – Finding Content In the early days of the Internet, users shared files using FTP servers. To help facilitate the ability to find these files Archie was written by Alan Emtage of McGill University in Montreal in 1990. Archie provided script based data gathering with query capabilities, creating the first true web search. Based on the success of Archie, alternative utilities were created, the most popular of which was Gopher. To search Gopher, Veronica and Jughead were written in 1993. These represent the first S-curve in search evolution. The problem with these tools was that the user had to manually maintain the directory of sites that could be searched. Indexability They were limited in their reach and quickly became outdated. Around this time, Matthew Gray of MIT wrote the World Wide Web Wanderer, the web’s Spiders first robot. Bots were a disruption to the Hierarchy existing state of search technology Bot Based Search WWW Worm allowing computers to automatically Archie index and re-index sites. While they 1990 2000 2010 Figure 1: Disruptive innovation in index-ability for search significantly increased the number of sites that could be accessed through automation of the indexing, result relevancy became the dominant issue. However, over a period of time more generalized ‘bots’ emerged which searched different collections of data. Spiders were another significant incremental innovation to bots - they not only indexed the content, they followed page links and references to find new sites. In 1993, three search engines emerged that leveraged spiders: JumpStation, the World Wide Web Worm, and Repository-Based Software Engineering (RBSE) spider. Bots and Spiders represent the second S-curve in the evolution of search engines. 2.2 Quality of Results JumpStation and WWW Worm simply listed results in the order they were found on the web. This algorithm, a FIFO implementation, was not scaleable and these
Recommended publications
  • Internet Economy 25 Years After .Com
    THE INTERNET ECONOMY 25 YEARS AFTER .COM TRANSFORMING COMMERCE & LIFE March 2010 25Robert D. Atkinson, Stephen J. Ezell, Scott M. Andes, Daniel D. Castro, and Richard Bennett THE INTERNET ECONOMY 25 YEARS AFTER .COM TRANSFORMING COMMERCE & LIFE March 2010 Robert D. Atkinson, Stephen J. Ezell, Scott M. Andes, Daniel D. Castro, and Richard Bennett The Information Technology & Innovation Foundation I Ac KNOW L EDGEMEN T S The authors would like to thank the following individuals for providing input to the report: Monique Martineau, Lisa Mendelow, and Stephen Norton. Any errors or omissions are the authors’ alone. ABOUT THE AUTHORS Dr. Robert D. Atkinson is President of the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation. Stephen J. Ezell is a Senior Analyst at the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation. Scott M. Andes is a Research Analyst at the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation. Daniel D. Castro is a Senior Analyst at the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation. Richard Bennett is a Research Fellow at the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation. ABOUT THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION FOUNDATION The Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF) is a Washington, DC-based think tank at the cutting edge of designing innovation policies and exploring how advances in technology will create new economic opportunities to improve the quality of life. Non-profit, and non-partisan, we offer pragmatic ideas that break free of economic philosophies born in eras long before the first punch card computer and well before the rise of modern China and pervasive globalization. ITIF, founded in 2006, is dedicated to conceiving and promoting the new ways of thinking about technology-driven productivity, competitiveness, and globalization that the 21st century demands.
    [Show full text]
  • DOCUMENT RESUME AUTHOR Webnet 96 Conference Proceedings
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 427 649 IR 019 168 AUTHOR Maurer, Hermann, Ed. TITLE WebNet 96 Conference Proceedings (San Francisco, California, October 15-19, 1996). INSTITUTION Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, Charlottesville, VA. PUB DATE 1996-10-00 NOTE 930p.; For selected individual papers, see IR 019 169-198. Many figures and tables are illegible. AVAILABLE FROM Web site: http://aace.virginia.edu/aace/conf/webnet/proc96.html; also archived on WebNet 98 CD-ROM (includes 1996, 1997, 1998) AACE Membership/CD orders, P.O. Box 2966, Charlottesville, VA 22902; Fax: 804-978-7449 ($35, AACE members, $40, nonmembers). PUB TYPE Collected Works Proceedings (021) EDRS PRICE MF06/PC38 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Access to Information; Authoring Aids (Programming); Computer Science; Computer Software; Courseware; Databases; Distance Education; Educational Media; Educational Strategies; *Educational Technology; Electronic Libraries; Elementary Secondary Education; *Hypermedia; Information Technology; Instructional Design; Multimedia Materials; Postsecondary Education; *World Wide Web IDENTIFIERS Electronic Commerce; Software Tools; Virtual Classrooms; *Web Sites ABSTRACT This proceedings contains 80 full papers, 12 posters/demonstrations, 108 short papers, one panel, and one tutorial, all focusing on World Wide Web applications. Topics include: designing hypertext navigation tools; Web site design; distance education via the Web; instructional design; the world-wide market and censorshipon the Web; customer support via the Web; VRML;
    [Show full text]
  • Regulating Search Engines: Taking Stock and Looking Ahead
    GASSER: REGULATING SEARCH ENGINES REGULATING SEARCH ENGINES: TAKING STOCK AND LOOKING AHEAD "To exist is to be indexed by a search engine" (Introna & Nissenbaum) URS GASSER TABLE OF CONTENTS I. IN TR O D UCTIO N ....................................................................................... 202 II. A BRIEF (AND CASUAL) HISTORY OF SEARCH ENGINES ..................... 203 Il. SEARCH ENGINE REGULATION: PAST AND PRESENT ........................ 208 A. OVERVIEW OF SEARCH ENGINE-RELATED CASES ............................ 208 B. LEGISLATION AND REGULATION ................................................. 216 C . SU M M AR Y .......................................................................................... 2 19 III. POSSIBLE FUTURE: HETEROGENEOUS POLICY DEBATES AND THE NEED FOR A NORMATIVE FRAMEWORK ......................................... 220 A. THEMES OF FUTURE POLICY DEBATES ............................................. 220 B . C HALLENGES A HEAD ........................................................................ 224 C. NORMATIVE FOUNDATIONS .............................................................. 227 IV . C ON CLU SIO N ....................................................................................... 234 * Associate Professor of Law, S.J.D. (St. Gallen), J.D. (St. Gallen), LL.M. (Harvard), Attorney at Law, Director, Research Center for Information Law, Univ. of St. Gallen, Faculty Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society, Harvard Law School. I owe special thanks to my colleague James Thurman and the
    [Show full text]
  • Cryonics Magazine, Q1 2001
    SOURCE FEATURES PAGE Fred Chamberlain Glass Transitions: A Project Proposal 3 Mike Perry Interview with Dr. Jerry Lemler, M.D. 13 Austin Esfandiary A Tribute to FM-2030 16 Johnny Boston FM & I 18 Billy H. Seidel the ALCOR adventure 39 Natasha Vita-More Considering Aesthetics 45 Columns Book Review: Affective Computing..................................41 You Only Go Around Twice .................................................42 First Thoughts on Last Matters............................................48 TechNews.......................................................................51 Alcor update - 19 The Global Membership Challenge . 19 Letter from Steve Bridge . 26 President’s Report . 22 “Last-Minute” Calls . 27 Transitions and New Developments . 24 Alcor Membership Status . 37 1st Qtr. 2001 • Cryonics 1 Alcor: the need for a rescue team or even for ingly evident that the leadership of The Origin of Our Name cryonics itself. Symbolically then, Alcor CSC would not support or even would be a “test” of vision as regards life tolerate a rescue team concept. Less In September of 1970 Fred and extension. than one year after the 1970 dinner Linda Chamberlain (the founders of As an acronym, Alcor is a close if meeting, the Chamberlains severed all Alcor) were asked to come up with a not perfect fit with Allopathic Cryogenic ties with CSC and incorporated the name for a rescue team for the now- Rescue. The Chamberlains could have “Rocky Mountain Cryonics Society” defunct Cryonics Society of California forced a five-word string, but these three in the State of Washington. The articles (CSC). In view of our logical destiny seemed sufficient. Allopathy (as opposed and bylaws of this organization (the stars), they searched through star to Homeopathy) is a medical perspective specifically provided for “Alcor catalogs and books on astronomy, wherein any treatment that improves the Members,” who were to be the core of hoping to find a star that could serve as prognosis is valid.
    [Show full text]
  • BTLOOKSMART SIGNS TWO YEAR DEAL with BT OPENWORLD Submitted By: Prodigy Communications Monday, 23 September 2002
    BTLOOKSMART SIGNS TWO YEAR DEAL WITH BT OPENWORLD Submitted by: Prodigy Communications Monday, 23 September 2002 Leading UK ISP Teams With BTLookSmart for Two More Years London, 23rd September 2002 BTLookSmart today announced a two year advertising and search syndication deal with leading UK Internet service provider (ISP) BT Openworld. BTLookSmart is the international joint venture between LookSmart (NASDAQ: LOOK; ASX: LOK), global leader in Search Targeted Marketing, and British Telecommunications (NYSE: BTY). The agreement is an extension of an existing contract with BTLookSmart providing web search and directory solutions to BT Openworld. The comprehensive advertising and syndication deal stems from the companies joint initiatives to support the development of new revenue streams and the optimal monetisation of search traffic. BTLookSmart will host and serve BT Openworld’s search and directory service. The agreement, including sales of space for BidSmart Featured Listings, Performance Listings and graphical advertising, will be controlled and operated by BTLookSmart. The mechanism will allow highly targeted advertising through cross-linking to keyword search and categories. Revenues generated will be shared between BT Openworld and BTLookSmart. “The extension of our contract with BT Openworld is an endorsement of BTLookSmart’s strengths and expertise in the provision of search and directory services. This syndication deal, coupled with our recent acquisition of UK Plus, shows that we are in a unique position to provide a total managed search solution for ISPs and Portals,” said Kevin Kerrigan, BTLookSmart COO. “We look forward to continue working with BTLookSmart to provide highly effective search results for our customers as well as effective monetisation of search traffic”, said Mehdi Salam, Director of Sales, BT Openworld.
    [Show full text]
  • Dining Hall,” “Cafeteria,” and “Campus Food Service” • Be Specific As You Learn More – E.G
    THE INTERNET Conducting Internet Research Computer Applications I Martin Santos Jorge Cab Objectives • After completing this section, students will be able to: • Understand the internet • Identify the different tools for research • Use and cite references from the internet Lecturers: Martin Santos/Jorge Cab (S.P.J.C.) 2 Vocabulary List • Internet (the Net): a global connection of millions of computer networks • Browser: software that helps a user access web sites (Internet Explorer and Netscape) • Server: a computer that runs special software and sends information over the Internet when requested • World Wide Web (the Web or www.): multimedia portion of the Internet consisting of text, graphics, audio and video • URL: stands for Uniform Resource Locator. It is the website's “address” or what the user types in to make the connection • Web site: a “virtual” place on the Internet with a unique URL • Virtual: “mental” replica of something - you can’t “touch” it – need a “tool” to get to it • Web page: a place on a web site where specific information is located • Home page: main page of a web site and first page to load when a site is accessed • Hyperlink: “clickable” text or graphics – takes you from one place to another – usually underlined and shows a hand shaped icon • Hypertext: capability to “link” or “jump” to other references or cross references by clicking • Cyberspace: “electronic” universe where information from one computer connects with another • Upload: process of transferring information to a page/site on the internet • Download: process of transferring information to a computer • Search engine: a site that scans the contents of other web sites to create a large index of information • Domain (top level): code located in the URL representing the type of organization (i.e., .gov (government), .edu (education), .mil (military), .org (organization – non-profit), .com (commercial – a business – for profit) • Internet Service Provider (ISP): a company with direct connection to the Internet that grants subscribers access to various Internet services.
    [Show full text]
  • Finding Alibaba: How Jerry Yang Made the Most Lucrative Bet in Silicon Valley History
    Parmy Olson Forbes Staff I cover agitators and innovators in mobile. FOLLOW FORBES 9/30/2014 @ 12:55PM 122,847 views Finding Alibaba: How Jerry Yang Made The Most Lucrative Bet In Silicon Valley History This story appears in the October 20, 2014 issue of Forbes. Comment Now Follow Comments Yahoo's co-founder Jerry Yang at the office of his venture firm AME in Palo Alto, Calif. (Ethan Pines For Forbes) Jerry Yang’s Revenge - Forbes, 2014-10-20 Page 1 Jerry Yang is giving a quick tour of the conference room at his private investment firm in Palo Alto, Calif. It’s dotted with gifts and photos from his 20 years in Silicon Valley. Yahoo’s 45-year-old billionaire co-founder stops before a glass deal toy on a low table. “Um, I have no idea what that is.” He peers more closely, checks the date: September 2012. “That is… that was after I’d gone. I think that was the last deal I worked on at Yahoo.” The plaque commemorates what may have been one of the dumbest business decisions of all time. Yahoo’s board agreed to sell 523 million Alibaba shares, half of its stake, back to Alibaba at $13 apiece. Yang hadn’t been so keen to sell. They did anyway. By then he’d quit the board. Sure enough, Alibaba’s IPO last month rocked global markets. Shares of the Chinese e-commerce giant are now worth around $90. Yahoo still has a 16% stake worth $36 billion, but it left almost as much money on the table–some $35.5 billion–as its entire current market capitalization.
    [Show full text]
  • Consumer-Reports-Web
    TRUST WORTHY 13/WNET (www.thirteen.org)* E*TRADE FINANCIAL* The New York Times Online (NYTimes.com) A. Briggs Passport & Visa Expeditors, Inc.* Eastman Kodak Company* North Jersey Media Group* Adobe.com eMedicine.com, Inc.* Orbitz Aetna InteliHealth (www.intelihealth.com)* Epiar Inc.* Pfaltzgraff.com Air Force Association (www.afa.org)* Evolving Systems, Inc. (evolve.net)* Quackwatch* Alliance Consulting Group Associates Inc.* Factiva (www.factiva.com)* REALAGE (www.realage.com)* AmSouth Bank (www.amsouth.com)* FAIR: Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting RealNetworks (www.fair.org)* Anvil Media, Inc.* Roll Call (www.rollcall.com)*; Federal Computer Week* RCjobs (www.rcjobs.com)* Aon Corporation (www.aon.com)* FM-CFS Canada* St. Petersburg Times (www.sptimes.com)* Bankrate.com Forbes.com Inc. (www.forbes.com)* Sallie Mae (www.salliemae.com)* Barnes&Noble.com (bn.com) Greater Philadelphia Tourism Marketing Scholastic (www.scholastic.com)* Beliefnet Corporation (www.gophila.com) Shopping.com Best Buy Company, Inc. (BestBuy.com)* Healthology* Show Business Weekly* Beyond Ink LLC* Hewlett-Packard (hp.com) Sleeve City (www.sleevetown.com)* bismarcktribune.com* Hilton Hotels Corporation (www.hilton.com)* SponsorAnything.com* BMI Gaming, Inc. (www.bmigaming.com)* Hispanic Radio Network* Suicide and Mental Health Association International* BurlingtonCoatFactory.com*; BabyDepot.com* HotJobs TapeandMedia.com* Business Technology Association* Hotwire Thrivent Financial for Lutherans* Cablevision* INGDIRECT.com (www.thrivent.com) CARFAX* Ingenio, Inc.*
    [Show full text]
  • Market Research SD-5 Gathering Information About Commercial Products and Services
    Market Research SD-5 Gathering Information About Commercial Products and Services DEFENSE STANDARDIZATION PROGRA M JANUARY 2008 Contents Foreword 1 The Market Research Other Considerations 32 Background 2 Process 13 Amount of Information Strategic Market Research to Gather 32 What Is Market Research? 2 (Market Surveillance) 14 Procurement Integrity Act 32 Why Do Market Research? 2 Identify the Market or Market Paperwork Reduction Act 33 Segment of Interest 14 When Is Market Research Cost of Market Research 34 Done? 5 Identify Sources of Market Information 16 Who Should Be Involved In Market Research? 7 Collect Relevant Market Other Information Information 17 Technical Specialist 8 Document the Results 18 on Market Research 35 User 9 Logistics Specialist 9 Tactical Market Research Appendix A 36 (Market Investigation) 19 Testing Specialist 9 Types of Information Summarize Strategic Market Available on the Internet Cost Analyst 10 Research 19 Legal Counsel 10 Formulate Requirements 20 Appendix B 39 Contracting Officer 10 Web-Based Information Identify Sources of Sources Information 21 Guiding Principles 11 Collect Product or Service Appendix C 47 Examples of Tactical Start Early 11 Information from Sources 22 Collect Information from Information Define and Document Product or Service Users 26 Requirements 11 Evaluate the Data 27 Refine as You Proceed 12 Document the Results 30 Tailor the Investigation 12 Repeat as Necessary 12 Communicate 12 Involve Users 12 Foreword The Department of Defense (DoD) relies extensively on the commercial market for the products and services it needs, whether those products and services are purely commercial, modified for DoD use from commercial products and services, or designed specifically for DoD.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study on Vertical and Broad-Based Search Engines
    International Journal of Latest Trends in Engineering and Technology IJLTET Special Issue- ICRACSC-2016 , pp.087-093 e-ISSN: 2278-621X A STUDY ON VERTICAL AND BROAD-BASED SEARCH ENGINES M.Swathi1 and M.Swetha2 Abstract-Vertical search engines or Domain-specific search engines[1][2] are becoming increasingly popular because they offer increased accuracy and extra features not possible with general, Broad-based search engines or Web-wide search engines. The paper focuses on the survey of domain specific search engine which is becoming more popular as compared to Web- Wide Search Engines as they are difficult to maintain and time consuming .It is also difficult to provide appropriate documents to represent the target data. We also listed various vertical search engines and Broad-based search engines. Index terms: Domain specific search, vertical search engines, broad based search engines. I. INTRODUCTION The Web has become a very rich source of information for almost any field, ranging from music to histories, from sports to movies, from science to culture, and many more. However, it has become increasingly difficult to search for desired information on the Web. Users are facing the problem of information overload , in which a search on a general-purpose search engine such as Google (www.google.com) results in thousands of hits.Because a user cannot specify a search domain (e.g. medicine, music), a search query may bring up Web pages both within and outside the desired domain. Example 1: A user searching for “cancer” may get Web pages related to the disease as well as those related to the Zodiac sign.
    [Show full text]
  • 60 ENTREPRENEUR in the Click by Catherine Seda
    SEARCHING FOR SALES: Nacho Hernandez knows that thinking like your customers is key to successfully marketing via search engines. 60 I ENTREPRENEUR In the Click By Catherine Seda ou can’t resist the temptation. Fixated on ample, if you type a keyword into MSN Search your computer screen, you anxiously type on Microsoft’s consumer information and enter- Ykeywords relevant to your business into tainment site (www.msn.com), the Web site list- your favorite search engine. A list of search results ings displayed could be from Inktomi, Microsoft appears. You cringe as you spot several competitors, or Overture. Overture provides search results not then grumble because your company’s Web site only to MSN Search, but also to AltaVista and is nowhere to be seen. Where is it? That depends. Yahoo! Could a top site on Overture then appear Where is your search engine marketing strategy? as a top site on a distribution partner’s site? Yes. Gone are the days Unfortunately, these distribution relationships when adding keywords change frequently, making it difficult to deter- want all the right people to in meta tags to your mine exactly where results come from. site produced rankings. The challenging part, however, is figuring out how notice your business? then you Search engine marketing to land a top position in the search engines. There has evolved into a com- are two complementary yet completely different plex and competitive types of methods: optimization and advertising. need to make the most of today’s program. It’s also prof- Search engine optimization (SEO) refers to en- itable—according to a hancing your Web site design to make it more ap- March 2003 report by pealing to crawler-based search engines.
    [Show full text]
  • Serving the Boaters of America PROLOG P/R/C Greg Scotten, SN
    Volume 2, Issue 2 May 2012 Marketing and Public Relations, The Art and Science of Creating LINKS (Click on selected Link) a Call to Action and Causing a Change. The United States Power Squadrons PR Contest Forms Boating Safety Centennial Anniversary Articles Cabinet Serving the Boaters of America PROLOG P/R/C Greg Scotten, SN The United States Power Squadrons is Inside this issue: celebrating 100 years of community Jacksonville Sail & Power service on 1 February 2014. Your Squadron to conduct a celebratory USPS Centennial 1 squadron needs to be part of that boat parade on the St. John’s important Centennial event which is a River. national milestone. To celebrate this Bright Ideas 2 national milestone, several projects are The Power Squadrons Flag and underway and a national anniversary Etiquette Committee has designed Importance of 3 a unique boat Ensign, which Squadron Editors web page will post exciting activities and information. The Power Squadrons’ emphasizes the event, and is to be MPR Committee 3 Ship Store will be featuring items with flown on members’ vessels in 2013 Mission the 100th Anniversary Logo. An and 2014. A special new Power anniversary postal commemorative is Squadrons logo has been under discussion. All levels of the distributed and is available on line. organization are planning local 2012 Governing 4 A year long ceremonial activity is community activities. Board planned. At the 2013 Annual The precise anniversary day is Sunday, Meeting Governing Board, full sized anniversary Ensigns will be Hands-on Training 6 2 February 2014. But because the Governing Board at the Annual Meeting presented to each of the thirty- two districts.
    [Show full text]