Global Status Report 2019, 1St Edition, Is Published by the Secretariat of the Inter- Net & Jurisdiction Policy Network

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Global Status Report 2019, 1St Edition, Is Published by the Secretariat of the Inter- Net & Jurisdiction Policy Network INTERNET & JURISDICTION G LOBAL STATUS R EPORT 2019 AUTHOR: PROF. DAN JERKER B. SVANTESSON This Report was commissioned by the Secretariat of the Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network and au- thored by Professor Dr. Dan Jerker B. Svantesson. The Internet & Jurisdiction Global Status Report 2019, 1st Edition, is published by the Secretariat of the Inter- net & Jurisdiction Policy Network. The author of this Report made a best effort to map the current ecosystem and trends based on desk-re- search, as well as stakeholder surveys and interviews. The completeness of information can however not be guaranteed, as this Report constitutes a first global baseline on the state of jurisdiction on the internet. Moreover, the analysis of the author does not nec- essarily reflect the view of the Secretariat of the In- ternet & Jurisdiction Policy Network, of stakeholders engaged in the Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network, or of the financial supporters of the Report. Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network - Paris, France The Secretariat of the Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network is grateful for the financial and institutional support of the following entities that have enabled the production of the Report: REPORT CITATION Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network (2019). Internet & Jurisdiction Global Status Report 2019. FOREWORDS BERTRAND DE LA CHAPELLE and PAUL FEHLINGER Executive Director and Deputy Executive Director Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network ow to handle the coexistence of het- emerging digital economy. To preserve the erogeneous laws on the cross-bor- open, cross-border nature of the internet, der internet is one of the greatest policy coherence and legal interoperability Hpolicy challenges of the digital 21st century. between multiple regimes must be estab- Yet, scalable and coherent policy solutions lished. This requires communication, coor- cannot be developed without a comprehen- dination and, ultimately, cooperation among sive understanding of a highly complex and all stakeholders. dynamic ecosystem comprised of multiple Yet, sound policy-making must be based actors, initiatives and trends across the pol- on evidence and reliable data. Policy co- icy silos of digital economy, human rights herence on a transnational basis can only and security. This was a clear call by over be achieved through a shared understand- 200 key stakeholders from 40 countries at ing of the issues at stake and awareness of the 2nd Global Conference of the Internet & the various initiatives. The availability of Jurisdiction Policy Network in 2018. Howev- this comprehensive overview and analysis er, even decades after the rise of the com- of trends and initiatives will translate the mercial internet, such consolidated data did highly complex and often technical nature not yet exist. To provide this indispensable of substantive issues for decision makers. mapping and analysis, the Secretariat of the This Report represents the first step of an Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network de- ongoing effort by the Secretariat of the cided to launch the world’s first Internet & Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network to Jurisdiction Global Status Report. make this essential information accessible Drawing on the unique expertise of key to all stakeholders, to help them to collec- stakeholders engaged in the policy devel- tively address some of the most pressing opment work in the Internet & Jurisdiction global challenges of our times. Policy Network, this inaugural edition of the We are delighted that this full edition of Global Status Report provides a first snap- the Internet & Jurisdiction Global Status shot and baseline. This Report should be Report will be launched on the occasion of understood as a foundational dataset that the 14th Internet Governance Forum in Ber- will allow us to collectively proceed and fill lin, Germany. We would like to express our in the gaps in future global and regional edi- gratitude to the pioneers of this new global tions. For this ambitious and crucial endeav- effort to foster policy coherence through our, we invite all stakeholders to contribute capacity building and evidence-based policy their knowledge and share their data. innovation: the stakeholders in the Internet Clarifying how existing national laws apply & Jurisdiction Policy Network, the author, in cyberspace and developing new balanced Professor Dan Svantesson, as well as Ger- frameworks to address abuses, will ena- many, Denmark, Estonia and the European ble the digital economy to protect human Commission, who are making this essential rights and will determine the shape of the effort possible. INTERNET & JURISDICTION POLICY NETWORK 2 DR. MARIA FLACHSBARTH CASPER KLYNGE Parliamentary State Secretary to the Federal Minister for Danish Tech-ambassador Economic Cooperation and Development, Germany Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark he World Wide Web, the internet as most people igitalisation and technology are defining parame- know it, is just 30 years old. Within this short amount ters for how our societies evolve in the 21st centu- of time, the distinction between the online and of- ry. On the one hand, technology has the potential Tfline world has become meaningless. We are online every Dto lift people out of poverty, improve healthcare and other day. We use the internet to receive news. We communicate key sectors of society and drive economic growth. On the with family, friends and co-workers. Our homes and appli- other hand, technology could exacerbate inequalities, un- ances are connected through the Internet of Things. We dermine fundamental rights and erode public trust in dem- order business services and interact with local and national ocratic institutions. To reap the benefits and minimise the authorities. Our mobile phones and laptops make for easy risks of technological development, a balanced approach internet access at home or on the go. is necessary. This requires the right policy framework. We The internet increased global connectivity, advanced our therefore need to identify the challenges technology pre- societies and economies, and still offers tremendous op- sents to governance at both the national and international portunities. However, we must not forget that almost half level. Cross-border technologies, such as the internet and the world’s population has no access to the internet. Par- platform economy, bring a range of such challenges. ticularly, women are facing inequalities with regard to ac- Denmark therefore welcomes the Internet & Jurisdiction cess to the internet and participation in the IT sector. The Policy Network’s effort to map the major trends of the digi- internet’s potential still needs to be unlocked in remote ar- tal society. The Internet & Juristiction Global Status Report is eas and less developed countries. This is a task of utmost a timely contribution towards a better understanding of the importance, and we need to keep it in mind when talking digital age, which is an important step in providing us with a about the internet’s future and evolution. Also, not all coun- solid base for constructive international dialogue and cooper- tries and stakeholders have been able to contribute equally ation. Approximately two years ago, the Danish government to discussions about internet jurisdiction and regulation. decided to elevate technology and digitisation to a strategic The internet established some new challenges, too. Free foreign policy priority – through the TechPlomacy-initiative speech needs to be protected online and we have to find – and to appoint Denmark’s, and in fact the world’s first, Am- ways to deal with hate speech, manipulation and misinfor- bassador for Technology and Digitization (‘Tech Ambassa- mation. Data security and privacy rights are of highest im- dor’) and to create a dedicated representation to technology. portance and we require a defence against mounting cyber The initiative is a response to the increasing importance that threats. Eventually, we need to have a secure but open and technology, digitalisation and the industry has on individuals, reliable internet that benefits all, people and businesses societies and international relations alike – and the necessity around the world. of boosting the dialogue between the tech industry, govern- Germany advocates for net neutrality, free speech and ac- ments and multilateral organisations. We are working towards cess for all. The Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation a stronger multistakeholder cooperation to ring-fence core and Development cooperates closely with developing coun- values and institutions and to promote a human-centric ap- tries in digitalisation processes and promotes the inclusion proach to technological development. In short, a balanced of developing countries in all relevant discussions. That is approach where public and private actors take responsibility. why we supported this very first Internet & Jurisdiction In recognition of the urgent need for common norms and the Global Status Report. perseverance of a rules-based international order in the dig- We wish for the progressing debate on jurisdictional chal- ital era. To get regulation right and to safeguard democracy, lenges to the open internet to be inclusive, to involve all human rights and the rule of law. stakeholders and to be open for all regions of the world. Digitalisation is international and cross-border in nature, creating a number of new legal and other challenges to our societies and the rule of law in the digital age – an age that for the very
Recommended publications
  • Estudio De Derecho Comparado Sobre La Responsabilidad De Los Intermediarios En Internet Por Violaciones De Derechos De Autor
    COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS ON NATIONAL APPROACHES TO THE LIABILITY OF INTERNET INTERMEDIARIES FOR INFRINGEMENT OF COPYRIGHT AND RELATED RIGHTS Ignacio GARROTE FERNÁNDEZ-DÍEZ1 Associate Professor of Civil Law Autonomous University of Madrid 1 The author would like to thank Prof. Juan José Marín López, Professor of Civil Law at the University of Castile-La Mancha (Spain), for his generosity when it came to providing a good part of the material used in the research that led to the drafting of this paper. Thanks for their collaboration must also go to Carlos Castro (Colombia), Adriana Mauleón (Mexico), Anastasia Amosova (Russia) and Federico Mastrolilli (Italy). Any possible errors committed in this paper are the author's exclusive responsibility. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................... 3 II. ARGENTINA ......................................................................... 5 III. BELGIUM ......................................................................... 7 IV. BRAZIL ......................................................................... 14 V. CHILE ......................................................................... 17 VI. FINLAND ......................................................................... 21 VII. FRANCE ......................................................................... 24 VIII. GERMANY ......................................................................... 32 IX. ITALY ......................................................................... 41
    [Show full text]
  • Intermediaries and Hate Speech: Fostering Digital Citizenship for Our Information Age
    University of Colorado Law School Colorado Law Scholarly Commons Articles Colorado Law Faculty Scholarship 2011 Intermediaries and Hate Speech: Fostering Digital Citizenship for Our Information Age Danielle Keats Citron University of Maryland School of Law Helen Norton University of Colorado Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/articles Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, and the Internet Law Commons Citation Information Danielle Keats Citron and Helen Norton, Intermediaries and Hate Speech: Fostering Digital Citizenship for Our Information Age, 91 B.U. L. REV. 1435 (2011), available at https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/articles/ 178. Copyright Statement Copyright protected. Use of materials from this collection beyond the exceptions provided for in the Fair Use and Educational Use clauses of the U.S. Copyright Law may violate federal law. Permission to publish or reproduce is required. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Colorado Law Faculty Scholarship at Colorado Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of Colorado Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. +(,121/,1( Citation: 91 B.U. L. Rev. 1435 2011 Provided by: William A. Wise Law Library Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline Tue Feb 28 14:00:01 2017 -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at http://heinonline.org/HOL/License -- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text. -- To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope of your HeinOnline license, please use: Copyright Information ARTICLE INTERMEDIARIES AND HATE SPEECH: FOSTERING DIGITAL CITIZENSHIP FOR OUR INFORMATION AGE DANIELLE KEATS CITRON & HELEN NORTON* IN TROD U CTION ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fostering Freedom Online: the Role of Internet Intermediaries
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Other Publications from the Center for Global Center for Global Communication Studies Communication Studies (CGCS) 1-2015 Fostering Freedom Online: The Role of Internet Intermediaries Rebecca MacKinnon Elonnai Hickok Allon Bar Hai-in Lim Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/cgcs_publications Part of the Communication Commons Recommended Citation MacKinnon, Rebecca; Hickok, Elonnai; Bar, Allon; and Lim, Hai-in. (2015). Fostering Freedom Online: The Role of Internet Intermediaries. Other Publications from the Center for Global Communication Studies. Retrieved from https://repository.upenn.edu/cgcs_publications/21 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/cgcs_publications/21 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Fostering Freedom Online: The Role of Internet Intermediaries Abstract “Fostering Freedom Online: the Role of Internet Intermediaries” is the title of a new title in the UNESCO Internet freedom series. With the rise of Internet intermediaries that play a mediating role on the internet between authors of content and audiences, UNESCO took a joint initiative, with the Open Society Foundations, the Internet Society, and Center for Global Communication Studies at the University of Pennsylvania’s Annenberg School for Communication, to examine this recent historical phenomenon and how it impacts on freedom of expression and associated fundamental rights such as privacy. The case study research, collaboratively
    [Show full text]
  • Internet Intermediary Liability: Wilmap, Theory and Trends
    INTERNET INTERMEDIARY LIABILITY: WILMAP, THEORY AND TRENDS Giancarlo F. Frosio forthcoming in 12 Indian Journal of Law and Technology (2017) ABSTRACT To better understand the heterogeneity of the international online intermediary liability regime—with the collaboration of an amazing team of contributors across five continents—I have developed and launched the World Intermediary Liability Map (WILMap), a detailed English-language resource hosted at Stanford CIS and comprised of case law, statutes, and proposed laws related to intermediary liability worldwide. Since its launch in July 2014, the WILMap has been steadily and rapidly growing. Today, the WILMap covers almost one hundred jurisdictions in Africa, Asia, the Caribbean, Europe, Latin America, North America and Oceania. After introducing the WILMap—and the surrounding landscape of recent projects related to intermediary liability—this article aims at discussing advancement in intermediary liability theory and describing emerging regulatory trends. I. INTRODUCTION Unsurprisingly, online intermediaries’ obligations, liabilities, and responsibilities increasingly take the center stage of Internet policy. However, inconsistencies across different regimes generate legal uncertainties that undermine both users’ rights and business opportunities. To better understand the heterogeneity of the international online intermediary liability regime—with the collaboration of an amazing team of contributors across five continents—I have developed and launched the World Intermediary Liability Map (WILMap), a detailed English-language resource hosted Senior Researcher and Lecturer, Center for International Intellectual Property Studies (CEIPI), Universitè de Strasbourg; Non-Resident Fellow, Stanford Law School, Center for Internet and Society. S.J.D., Duke University School of Law, Durham, North Carolina; LL.M., Duke University School of Law, Durham, North Carolina; LL.M., Strathclyde University, Glasgow, UK; J.D., Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy.
    [Show full text]
  • Reducing Online Hate Speech: Recommendations for Social Media Companies and Internet Intermediaries
    Reducing Online Hate Speech The Internet and social media have revolutionized the production, consumption, and Recommendations for Social Media flow of information around the world, allowing billions of people to interact with one another and to exchange views and ideas. Unfortunately, the same digital platforms Companies and Internet Intermediaries also facilitate the circulation of harmful content, including online hate speech, and its Companies and Internet Intermediaries Recommendations for Social Media Reducing Online Hate Speech dissemination on an unprecedented scale at remarkable speed. Addressing the harmful consequences of online hate speech poses a unique regulatory challenge, because such speech is typically hosted on private platforms that operate in digital space and outside the control of most national governments. The present publication contains the results of a joint research project undertaken by the Israel Democracy Institute (IDI) and Yad Vashem, with the goal of supporting efforts by social media companies and other internet intermediaries to formulate policies and policy guidelines that can reduce online hate speech. The first part consists of the IDI/Yad Vashem Recommendations for Reducing Online Hate Speech: sixteen Editor: Yuval Shany Editor: Yuval recommendations, developed by a team of senior international experts in the field, which are meant to serve as the basis of policy guidelines for social media companies and internet intermediaries. The second part consists of studies by members of the research team—Tehilla Shwartz-Altshuler (IDI) and Mr. Rotem Medzini (IDI), Prof. Karen Eltis (University of Ottawa) and Dr. Ilia Siatitsa (Geneva Academy of Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law), and Prof. Susan Benesch (Berkman Klein Center, Harvard University)—that analyze online platforms’ current policies and the legal frameworks in which they operate, and propose directions for future reforms.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating the Approaches to Social Media Liability for Prohibited Speech
    \\jciprod01\productn\N\NYI\51-4\NYI406.txt unknown Seq: 1 29-JUL-19 14:08 EVALUATING THE APPROACHES TO SOCIAL MEDIA LIABILITY FOR PROHIBITED SPEECH ZI EN CHOW I. INTRODUCTION .................................. 1293 R II. DEFINITION OF PROHIBITED SPEECH .............. 1295 R III. UNDERSTANDING SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS ...... 1298 R A. First Option: No Liability for Social Media Platforms .................................... 1301 R B. Second Option: Strict Liability for Social Media Platforms .................................... 1303 R C. Third Option: Liability for Social Media Platforms Under Certain Circumstances ......... 1306 R IV. EVALUATION .................................... 1307 R V. CONCLUSION .................................... 1311 R I. INTRODUCTION “Facebook has been a useful instrument for those seeking to spread hate, in a context where, for most users, Facebook is the Internet . The extent to which Facebook posts and messages have led to real- world discrimination and violence must be indepen- dently and thoroughly examined.”1 In recent years, Internet intermediary responsibility for prohibited content posted by the users of those intermediaries has been in the spotlight. U.N. human rights experts have sug- gested that Facebook played a role in spreading hate speech in Myanmar, contributing to large scale human rights violations.2 Ultra-nationalist Buddhists in Myanmar have utilized Facebook to incite violence against the Rohingya people and 1. Human Rights Council, Rep. of the Indep. Int’l Fact-Finding Mission on Myan., ¶ 74, U.N. Doc. A/HRC/39/64 (Sept. 12, 2018). 2. Tom Miles, U.N. Investigators Cite Facebook Role in Myanmar Crisis, REUTERS, Mar. 12, 2018, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-myanmar-ro hingya-facebook/u-n-investigators-cite-facebook-role-in-myanmar-crisis-idUS KCN1GO2PN; id.; see Louise Matsakis, Twitter Releases New Policy on ‘Dehuman- izing Speech,’ WIRED (Sept.
    [Show full text]
  • Uva-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Hosting Intermediary Services and Illegal Content Online An analysis of the scope of article 14 ECD in light of developments in the online service landscape van Hoboken, J.; Quintais, J.P.; Poort, J.; van Eijk, N. DOI 10.2759/284542 Publication date 2018 Document Version Final published version Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): van Hoboken, J., Quintais, J. P., Poort, J., & van Eijk, N. (2018). Hosting Intermediary Services and Illegal Content Online: An analysis of the scope of article 14 ECD in light of developments in the online service landscape. (Digital Single Market). European Commission. https://doi.org/10.2759/284542 General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of
    [Show full text]
  • Hosting Intermediary Services and Illegal Content Online
    HOSTING INTERMEDIARY SERVICES AND ILLEGAL CONTENT ONLINE An analysis of the scope of article 14 ECD in light of developments in the online service landscape 1 Digital Single Market FINAL REPORT A study prepared for the European Commission DG Communications Networks, Content & Technology by: 2 Digital Single Market This study was carried out for the European Commission by Authors: Joris van Hoboken (Institute for Information Law (IViR), Faculty of Law, University of Amsterdam; Research Group on Law Science Technology & Society (LSTS), Vrije Universiteit Brussel), João Pedro Quintais, Joost Poort, Nico van Eijk (Institute for Information Law (IViR), Faculty of Law, University of Amsterdam) Internal identification Contract number: SMART number 2018/0033 DISCLAIMER By the European Commission, Directorate-General of Communications Networks, Content & Technology. The information and views set out in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the Commission. The Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this study. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein. ISBN 978-92-79-93002-7 DOI 10.2759/284542 © European Union, 2018. All rights reserved. Certain parts are licensed under conditions to the EU. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. ABSTRACT: This short study looks at the scope of the hosting safe harbour, in view of policies with respect to illegal content online and questions about the scope of Article 14 of the Electronic Commerce Directive (2000/31/EC) from a legal and practical perspective.
    [Show full text]