MALAWI NO ALERT Food Security Update WATCH WWWAAARRRNNNIIINNNGGG February 2006 EMERGENCY

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

MALAWI NO ALERT Food Security Update WATCH WWWAAARRRNNNIIINNNGGG February 2006 EMERGENCY ALERT STATUS: MALAWI NO ALERT Food Security Update WATCH WWWAAARRRNNNIIINNNGGG February 2006 EMERGENCY CONTENTS Summary and Implications Summaries and timeline .............1 Markets and Prices .....................2 Prolonged dry spells in some districts have caused fears of reduced maize production from Special Focus: Dry spells pose a the initial estimate of about 2.4 million metric tons (MT). Even if the rains resume, the threat to crop Production ...........4 crops may not recover in some parts of the country, and affected households will be food Appendix: Prices compared to insecure this season. Apart from maize, the production of other crops such as beans, MVAC Scenarios.........................6 tobacco, cassava and sweet potatoes has also suffered. More details about the impact of the dry spells on crop production will be provided when the second round production figures are presented. The maize supply situation in ADMARC markets remains tight. Many ADMARC markets have no stocks for sale, leaving the local markets as the only option for household maize purchases. Unfortunately, most of the private traders are concentrated in local markets located in or near the urban areas where there is more purchasing power and accessibility than in the rural remote areas. With fewer traders supplying remote rural markets with maize, supplies and prices are more erratic. The hunger season has now reached its peak. In an effort to meet their immediate food needs, some of the households are engaging in piece work in exchange for food or cash, selling livestock at reduced prices, selling firewood, etc. Households targeted by food aid distribution programs continue to benefit, and the assistance has helped to mitigate the negative impacts of this year’s hunger season. Seasonal Timeline Current Hazard Summary • Local market maize prices continue to rise at an unprecedented rate, exacerbating food access problems for an increasing number of people at a time of the year when most households have run out of their own production and are entirely dependent on markets for food. • Prolonged dry spells, especially in parts of the central and northern regions of the country, cause concerns over production prospects in the region. • Scarcity of casual labor opportunities and a drop in livestock prices negatively affects household income and ability to buy food. Food Security Summary The hunger season is now at its peak. The number of people seeking casual employment has grown. Unfortunately, most agricultural activities have been completed and, consequently, there is little demand for casual labor, the main source of income for majority of the poor rural households. People from areas surrounding cities are begging for cash to buy food. FEWS NET is a USAID funded activity. Comments or questions regarding this report can be addressed to Sam Chimwaza, FEWS NET representative for Malawi: FEWS NET/Malawi, Off Chilambula Road, Old Town, P.O. Box 30455, Lilongwe 3, MALAWI (Tel) 265 1 754892; (Fax) 265 1 754892; Email:[email protected] Disclaimer: The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the view of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. MALAWI: FOOD SECURITY UPDATE FEBRUARY 2006 The crops in the field are beginning to mature, especially in the southern region and parts of the central region. In a few areas, some of the households, particularly those not targeted with food aid, have begun to harvest green maize for consumption. Although consumption of green maize as a snack is considered normal behavior, more households have been using the green maize as the main source of food as they cannot afford to buy maize at the prevailing high prices. This will have a negative impact on the final harvest and will push poorer households, who already produce insufficient quantities of food, into a vicious circle of chronic and deepening food insecurity. With the termination of food aid distributions at the end of March, it is feared that many households will be forced to prematurely harvest their maize. It may be necessary, if resources permit, to extend food aid distribution in some areas to April/May when the maize is fully matured and dry. Because of the high price of maize, some poor households have been forced to substitute cheaper maize husks for maize grain and prepare an inferior quality of the staple food, nsima. Those who can afford a bit of maize mix the two to increase the amount of flour they obtain from the little money they have. Maize husks are not used for human consumption in normal years and are rarely found on the market. However, in bad years when maize grain prices soar, husks surface in the local markets as a cheaper substitute source of food. The wide availability of maize husks in the local markets this year, especially in the rural markets, is a manifestation of the severity of the food security problem. Households that have livestock are selling Table 1: Commodity Price Comparison their animals to obtain cash for food. Commodity Unit of Price/unit last Price/unit this However, livestock prices in some areas Measurement year (MK) year (MK) have dropped as a result of the high volume Maize Pail 300 - 350 900 - 1,300 of distress sales. Table 1 compares current Green Maize Cob 5 -10 7 – 15 livestock prices with those over same time Cassava Tuber 0.50 -10 5 – 20 last year in Chamama Extension Planning European Potatoes Pail 250 -300 450 – 500 Area (EPA) in Kasungu District. The table Maize husks Pail N/A 350 – 450 Dried Cassava Pail N/A 400 furtrher shows that while the price of food Chips has at least doubled, the price of livestock Beans Pail 1,200 1,900 has drastically fallen, typical of the hunger Cattle Each 15,000 - 25,000 9,000 – 15,000 season. In Kasungu District, dried cassava Goats Each 1,500 – 2,500 800 – 1,200 chips and maize husks are not typically used Sheep Each 1,800 – 3,000 700 – 1,000 for making nsima flour. Yet, due to food Pig Each 2,500 – 4,000 800 – 1,500 Chicken Each 150 – 250 75 – 150 insecurity, some of the households are Source: FEWS NET/ Malawi forced to buy dried cassava chips just to have something to eat. In addition, maize husks are also found in many local markets with prices as high as MK350 to MK450 per pail, which is equivalent to the price of maize grain in a normal year. The situation is similar in many parts of the rural areas in the country. Markets and Prices February is the peak of the hunger season. Figure 1: Local Market Maize Price Ranges, April 2005 to February 2006 Many households will have depleted their food stocks from last year’s harvest, and the February current year’s harvest is not ready for January consumption until sometime in March/April, December especially for the central and northern November regions. This results in an increased demand October for marketed food commodities, especially September maize, pushing up maize prices in local August markets. In a bad year such as this one, the July price increases are dramatic, because of the scarcity and an ineffective supply response. June Due to the scarcity of typical maize supplies May this year (normally available within Malawi April or neighboring Mozambique), traders are 0 1020304050607080 Malawi Kwacha/kg finding it difficult to source adequate FEWSNet/Malawi Source:MoAFS quantities of maize. When they do, the 2 MALAWI: FOOD SECURITY UPDATE FEBRUARY 2006 prices are extremely high. These high prices, coupled with the increase in demand, push up maize prices in the local markets. Maize prices in February ranged from MK20.83/kg at Misuku market in Chitipa District to MK67.75/kg at Monkey Bay market in Mangochi District. Last year at this time, the lowest prices were MK12.5 and MK23 at Bangula market in Nsanje District and Namwera market in Mangochi District, respectively. Figure 1 shows that price ranges stabilized a bit in October to December, which coincides with the period when there was a relatively smooth flow along the food aid pipeline and a stable flow of government maize imports for sale in ADMARC markets. This suggests that the policies and programs have played a significant role in stabilizing the maize prices in the local markets. The price variation has since increased significantly – see January and February 2006 data in Figure 1. Table 2: LOCAL MARKET MAIZE PRICE COMPARISON - JANUARY AND FEBRUARY 2006 Market January February % change Market January February % change Market January February % change NKHATABAY 56.22 50.62 -10% KASUNGU 43.29 49.35 14% THETE 39.25 51.00 30% NTONDA 46.00 46.00 0% MISUKU 18.05 20.83 15% NAMBUMA 36.74 47.75 30% MWANZA 48.68 49.09 1% BALAKA 53.64 62.68 17% NSANJE 43.96 58.54 33% LILONGWE 33.25 33.83 2% MZUZU 38.27 44.84 17% MTAKATAKA 49.67 66.33 34% CHIRADZULU 54.92 56.03 2% BEMBEKE 41.28 48.75 18% BVUMBWE 42.00 56.25 34% NKHOTAKOTA 48.67 49.67 2% DOWA 30.92 37.03 20% LUNZU 45.87 62.65 37% NANJIRI 34.82 35.91 3% TSANGANO T-OFF 40.77 49.01 20% CHITIPA 31.21 42.79 37% NSUNDWE 42.70 45.00 5% MZIMBA 33.91 40.98 21% MONKEY BAY 49.07 67.75 38% BANGULA 50.59 53.50 6% LIZULU 41.26 50.00 21% NTCHISI 38.76 53.65 38% LUCHENZA 42.50 45.00 6% MANGOCHI 49.10 60.09 22% JALI 40.19 55.80 39% SALIMA 47.67 50.53 6% PHALOMBE 55.08 67.51 23% THONDWE 41.73 58.57 40% NAMWERA 43.38 46.32 7% MITUNDU 41.53 51.18 23% CHILUMBA 26.10 37.36 43% NKHOMA 32.53 35.00 8% KARONGA 44.27 54.88 24% MIGOWI 44.11 63.55 44% SANTHE 30.52 33.37 9% NGABU 48.33 60.00 24% NCHALO 42.22 62.00 47% DWANGWA 56.37 62.13 10% CHIMBIYA 40.25 50.00 24% HEWE 23.71 35.04 48% JENDA 45.22 50.00 11% ZOMBA 41.25 51.25 24% MALOMO 38.53 57.00 48% LIWONDE 44.33 49.12 11% LIMBE 48.00 60.00 25% RUMPHI 32.84 49.21 50% MWANSAMBO 47.34 52.99 12% MAYAKA 45.00 56.67 26% NTCHEU 40.05 60.59 51% MCHINJI 37.50 42.53 13% CHINTHECHE 42.48 54.99 29% NENO 38.82 n/a CHIKWAWA 48.34 54.82 13% MPONELA 32.14 41.62 30% EMBANGWENI 50.00 n/a NTHALIRE 22.79 25.87 14% MULOZA 46.25 60.00 30% Source: Ministry of Agriculture There are 60 markets for which maize price data was available for January and February 2006 to make comparisons.
Recommended publications
  • We Will Still Live: Confronting Stigma and Discrimination
    Leitner Center for International Law and Justice We Will Still Live Fordham Law School Confronting Stigma and Discrimination Against 33 West 60th Street Second Floor New York, NY 10023 Women Living with HIV/AIDS in Malawi 212.636.6862 REPORT MALAWI www.leitnercenter.org THE LEITNER CENTER We Will Still Live Confronting Stigma and Discrimination Against Women Living with HIV/AIDS in Malawi Chi Mgbako Jeanmarie Fenrich Tracy E. Higgins Associate Clinical Professor of Executive Director, Leitner Center Leitner Family Professor of Law, Fordham Law School for International Law and Justice International Human Rights, Fordham Law School Supervisor, Walter Leitner Fordham Law School International Human Rights Clinic Co-Director, Leitner Center for J.D. Fordham Law School 1998 International Law and Justice J.D. Harvard Law School 2005 J.D. Harvard Law School 1990 B.A. Columbia University 2001 B.A. Princeton University 1986 Contents Introduction 2 Acknowledgments 5 Part I Background 6 Malawi’s Obligations Under International and Domestic Law 6 International Law 6 Domestic Law 8 Women’s Vulnerability to HIV/AIDS in Malawi 8 Condoms and Negotiating Power 8 Economic Dependency 10 Violence Against Women 11 Harmful Traditional Practices 12 Commercial Sex Workers 14 Girls and Young Women 16 Male Sexuality and Denial 16 Part II Stigma and Discrimination Against Women Living with HIV/AIDS in Malawi 18 Community-Level Stigma 18 Verbal Attacks 18 Social Exclusion and Fear of Casual Transmission 19 AIDS, Sex, Morality, and Death 20 Fear of Stigma as an Impediment
    [Show full text]
  • Malawi Newborn Health Program Final Evaluation Report
    Malawi Newborn Health Program Final Evaluation Report National Level - Expanded Impact Project (with learning activities in the districts of Chitipa, Dowa, Thyolo, Mzimba, Mchinji) Cooperative Agreement No.: GHS-A-00-06-00016-00 30 September 2006 – 30 September 2011 Submitted to USAID/GH/HIDN/NUT/CSHGP December 31, 2011 by: Save the Children Federation, Inc. 54 Wilton Road, Westport, CT 06880 Telephone: (203) 221-4000 - Fax: (203) 221-4056 Contact Persons: Eric A. Swedberg, Senior Director, Child Health and Nutrition Carmen Weder, Associate Director, Department of Health & Nutrition Principal writers and editors: John Murray, External Team Leader; Karen Z. Waltensperger, Senior Advisor, Health-Africa Region; Nathalie Gamache, Associate Director, Country Support & Coordination, Saving Newborn Lives; Evelyn Zimba, Malawi Newborn Health Program Manager; Joby George, Senior Health Program Manager; Sharon Lake-Post, Editorial Consultant This report is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development USAID). The contents are the responsibility of Save the Children and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. Page Acronyms 3 A. PRELIMINARY INFORMATION 5 B. OVERVIEW OF THE PROJECT STRUCTURE AND IMPLEMENTATION 9 C. EVALUATION ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY AND LIMITATIONS 13 D. DATA QUALITY AND USE 14 E. PRESENTATION OF PROJECT RESULTS 17 F. DISCUSSION OF THE RESULTS 20 G. DISCUSSION OF POTENTIAL FOR SUSTAINED OUTCOMES, CONTRIBUTION TO SCALE,
    [Show full text]
  • Map District Site Balaka Balaka District Hospital Balaka Balaka Opd
    Map District Site Balaka Balaka District Hospital Balaka Balaka Opd Health Centre Balaka Chiendausiku Health Centre Balaka Kalembo Health Centre Balaka Kankao Health Centre Balaka Kwitanda Health Centre Balaka Mbera Health Centre Balaka Namanolo Health Centre Balaka Namdumbo Health Centre Balaka Phalula Health Centre Balaka Phimbi Health Centre Balaka Utale 1 Health Centre Balaka Utale 2 Health Centre Blantyre Bangwe Health Centre Blantyre Blantyre Adventist Hospital Blantyre Blantyre City Assembly Clinic Blantyre Chavala Health Centre Blantyre Chichiri Prison Clinic Blantyre Chikowa Health Centre Blantyre Chileka Health Centre Blantyre Blantyre Chilomoni Health Centre Blantyre Chimembe Health Centre Blantyre Chirimba Health Centre Blantyre Dziwe Health Centre Blantyre Kadidi Health Centre Blantyre Limbe Health Centre Blantyre Lirangwe Health Centre Blantyre Lundu Health Centre Blantyre Macro Blantyre Blantyre Madziabango Health Centre Blantyre Makata Health Centre Lunzu Blantyre Makhetha Clinic Blantyre Masm Medi Clinic Limbe Blantyre Mdeka Health Centre Blantyre Mlambe Mission Hospital Blantyre Mpemba Health Centre Blantyre Ndirande Health Centre Blantyre Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital Blantyre South Lunzu Health Centre Blantyre Zingwangwa Health Centre Chikwawa Chapananga Health Centre Chikwawa Chikwawa District Hospital Chikwawa Chipwaila Health Centre Chikwawa Dolo Health Centre Chikwawa Kakoma Health Centre Map District Site Chikwawa Kalulu Health Centre, Chikwawa Chikwawa Makhwira Health Centre Chikwawa Mapelera Health Centre
    [Show full text]
  • Master Plan Study on Rural Electrification in Malawi Final Report
    No. JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY (JICA) MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS (MONREA) DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AFFAIRS (DOE) REPUBLIC OF MALAWI MASTER PLAN STUDY ON RURAL ELECTRIFICATION IN MALAWI FINAL REPORT MAIN REPORT MARCH 2003 TOKYO ELECTRIC POWER SERVICES CO., LTD. MPN NOMURA RESEARCH INSTITUTE, LTD. JR 03-023 Contents 0 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... 1 1 Background and Objectives ........................................................................................................ 4 1.1 Background ......................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Objectives............................................................................................................................ 8 2 Process of Master Plan................................................................................................................ 9 2.1 Basic guidelines .................................................................................................................. 9 2.2 Identification of electrification sites ................................................................................. 10 2.3 Data and information collection........................................................................................ 10 2.4 Prioritization of electrification sites.................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 0129300018 Inventory of Malawi's ICH, Volume 2 2013
    0129300018 Inventory of Malawi's ICH, Volume 2 2013 Rec;u CLT I CIH I ITH Le I -~ OCT~ 201;- No ... ... ..... ~ /.. ~. .~ ...... MINISTRY OF TOURISM AND CULTURE MALAWI NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR UNESCO INVENTORY OF MALAWI' S INTANGIBLE CULTURAL HERITAGE VOLUME 2 September 2012 - April 2013 1 Inventory of Malawi's ICH, Volume 2 2013 CONTENTS 2 PREFACE ...................................................................................................................... 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..•...•..••.••.•••..•....•.•••.••..•..•...••.........•..•...•...................•..•..•••.• 4 1. INTRODUCTION 5 2.1NTANGIBLE CULTURAL HERITAGE ELEMENTS 6 2.1 Bandya Community ........•..........•...•....................................•.•..•••.••..•.•••.•••••••••••• 6 2.1.1 Ukuluka Umono ...••.........•••....•••..•.•....•••..•••...•..•••..••...•••..••.••••••••••••••••••••••..•.. • 6 2.1.2 Ukuluka lvingwe Kufuma Kukatani .................................................... 10 2.1.3 Ukupiya Chiponde ...••.......••.......••...•.••••......••.....•••......•.•..•••••••••••••••••••...• 12 2.1.4 Ukwimba lngwaya ................................•..•..••...•.........•.....•..•••••••••••••••••.•. 14 2.1.5 Ukubaza ltuli ............................................................................................... 16 2.1.6 Namayoka 18 2.2 Lambya Community 20 2.2.1 Ukusumbila 20 2.2.2 Ukusona lchibonde 21 2.2.3 Ukusyania lsengo ••.••••.......•••.••.•••.....•..••.......•..............•.......•..•.••••••..•••• 23 2.3. Mambwe Community •••..•..•......••.••.•••..•......•...•.•••..•..•••..••.•...................•.....••.•..•••.
    [Show full text]
  • Democratic Constitution and Ethnic Organizations in Malawi: Preserving Good Culture Or Promoting, Regionalism, Nepotism and Tribalism
    History Research, July-Sep., 2015, Vol. 5, No. 3, 169-187 doi: 10.17265/2159-550X/2015.03.004 D DAVID PUBLISHING Democratic Constitution and Ethnic Organizations in Malawi: Preserving Good Culture or Promoting, Regionalism, Nepotism and Tribalism Willie S. D. Zeze Nkhoma-Lilongwe, Malawi Due to the advent of the 1994 democratic constitution particularly sections 32 and 33 which provide for every person’s right to freedom of conscience, religion, belief and thought, and also to academic freedom Malawi has significantly witnessed mushroom development of tribal organizations, aiming at preserving and protecting local religious beliefs and cultural practices. The Chewa Heritage Foundation (CHEFO) and the Muhlako wa Alhomwe (MWA) are among the well-known numerous ethnic organizations through which the traditional beliefs, cultural and religious practices enjoy significant respect from Chewa and Lhomwe people. Although the new Constitution has cleared a road for the establishment of these ethnic organizations, it seems activities of all ethnic associations are significantly promoting tribalism and nepotism, in addition to being used as campaign tools by political parties. This article intends to critically assess and evaluate the role and the impact of the Chewa Heritage Foundation and Muhlako wa Alhomwe on rule of law, governance and culture in Malawi. The following question will guide the discussion: Why are the Chewa Heritage Foundation and Mulhako wa Alhomwe cultural associations while exercising their constitutional rights promoting tribalism, regionalism and nepotism and used as campaign machinery by both opposition and ruling political parties? Its hypothesis is, in spite of preserving protecting cultural practices as guaranteed in constitution, tribal organizations need to be watchful so that they should not promote tribalism, nepotism and being used as campaign tools by crooked and opportunist politicians.
    [Show full text]
  • Malawi Demographic and Health Survey 2000 [FR123]
    Malawi 2000 Malawi Malawi Demographic and Health Survey Demographic and Health Survey 2000 Malawi Demographic and Health Survey 2000 National Statistical Office Zomba, Malawi ORC Macro Calverton, Maryland, USA August 2001 This report presents findings from the 2000 Malawi Demographic and Health Survey (2000 MDHS), which was implemented by the National Statistical Office. ORC Macro (DHS) furnished technical assistance in the design and implementation of the survey. Funding for the 2000 MDHS survey was provided by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID/Malawi), the Department for International Development (DfID/Malawi), and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF/Malawi). The 2000 MDHS is part of a worldwide MEASURE Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS+) Project, which is designed to collect, analyse, and disseminate data on fertility, family planning, maternal and child health, HIV/AIDS, and other topics in health and population. Additional information about the Malawi DHS may be obtained from: National Statistical Office P.O. 333 Zomba, Malawi Telephone: 524-377 Fax 525-130 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.nso.malawi.net Information about the MEASURE DHS+ project may be obtained from: ORC Macro 11785 Beltsville Drive Suite 300 Calverton, MD 20705 Telephone: 301-572-0200 Fax: 301-572-0999 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.measuredhs.com Suggested citation: National Statistical Office [Malawi] and ORC Macro. 2001. Malawi Demographic and Health Survey 2000. Zomba, Malawi and Calverton, Maryland,
    [Show full text]
  • Malawi Country Operational Plan 2017 Strategic Direction Summary
    Malawi Country Operational Plan 2017 Strategic Direction Summary April 26, 2017 1 1.0 Goal Statement While there has been significant progress in the fight against HIV, Malawi still has 980,000 people living with HIV (PLHIV), including 350,000 undiagnosed. The Malawi Population-Based HIV Impact Assessment (MPHIA) showed significant progress toward the globally endorsed targets of 90-90-90. The number of new adult infections each year continues to decline (28,000/year in 2016), coinciding with an increase in ART coverage. With the number of annual HIV-related deaths reduced to 27,000/year in 2016, Malawi continues making progress toward epidemic control. However, MPHIA also highlights a disproportionately high HIV incidence among adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) with point estimates for HIV incidence 8 times higher among females aged 15-24 than males. Therefore, the overarching goal of COP17 is to interrupt HIV transmission by reducing incidence among AGYW through testing and treatment of potential sexual partners (men 15-40) and primary prevention (e.g., expansion of DREAMS and AGYW targeted interventions), thereby interrupting the lifecycle of HIV transmission and accelerating progress to epidemic control. The 1st 90 remains the greatest challenge and requires a number of key strategy shifts: Targeting testing and treatment strategies: Increased focus on targeting men and youth with the most efficient testing modalities (e.g., index case testing) and treatment strategies (e.g., same-day ART initiation) to achieve saturation across all age and gender bands in scale-up districts by the end of FY18. Increasing focus in five “acceleration” districts: Per the MPHIA, the epidemic is most intense in population-dense regions of Southern Malawi, especially Blantyre; therefore, PEPFAR will focus on Blantyre and four other high burden, scale up districts (deemed “acceleration” districts) that include 70% of the national gap to saturation.
    [Show full text]
  • Connectivity Solutions for 752 PEPFAR Supported MOH Clinics
    REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) #MAL-122019-EMR Connectivity Solutions for 752 PEPFAR Supported MOH Clinics ELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION (EGPAF) NED BANK House, City Centre, P.O. Box 2543, Lilongwe, Malawi FIRM DEADLINE: Friday, 17 January 2020 at 11am INTRODUCTION Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation (“EGPAF” or “Foundation”), a non-profit organization, is a world leader in the fight to eliminate pediatric AIDS. Our mission is to prevent pediatric HIV infection and to eliminate pediatric AIDS through research, advocacy, and prevention and treatment programs. For more information, please visit http://www.pedaids.org. OBJECTIVE OF THE ASSIGNMENT | SCOPE OF WORK | EXPECTED DELIVERABLES EGPAF seeks to contract with a reputable Vendor to immediately meet our current connectivity needs (with the possibility of fulfilling future needs as they arise) in support of an ambitious national Electronic Medical Records (EMR) initiative. It is anticipated that the selected Vendor can assess our requirements, develop a comprehensive and effective solution to implement at all 752 PEPFAR-supported MOH Clinics throughout Malawi (see Attachment 1), and eventually implement and install, in coordination with the necessary Foundation staff, all necessary infrastructure at each site to reflect its proposed solution(s). More specifically, the selected Contractor is expected to offer a fast and affordable Carrier Backbone network services to cover 752 clinics across the 28 Districts in Malawi to support regular and incremental data transmission from the Clinics/health facilities to a Central Data Repository hosted at the Ministry of Health. The winning Contractor will be responsible for installation of last mile connection to connect each health facility to the backbone network, including configuring Point-to-Point connections between the health facility and the Central Data Repository.
    [Show full text]
  • Emergency Appeal 2020
    EMERGENCY May - October APPEAL 2020 MALAWI MALAWI Overview Map Chitipa CHITIPA Chitipa v" District Hospital Karonga District Hospital v"v"Karonga old Hospital KARONGA Chilumba TANZANIA RUMPHI Rumphi Rumphi District v"Hospital ZAMBIA NORTHERN MZUZU CITY v" Mzuzu Mzuzu Central Hospital v" Nkhata Bay District Hospital NKHATA BAY MZIMBA Mzimba District v" Hospital LIKOMA LILONGWE CITY Lake Malawi MOZAMBIQUE Lilongwe Central Hospital "v KASUNGU \! NKHOTAKOTA "v v" Nkhotakota Bwaila/Bottom Hospital Kasungu District Hospital Kasungu v" District Hospital NTCHISI Ntchisi District ZOMBA CITY CENTRAL v"Hospital DOWA Dzaleka Refugee MCHINJI SALIMA Camp (44,385) v" Dowa District Hospital v"Salima District v" Mchinji District Hospital Hospital ZOMBA LILONGWE CITY v" \!v" DEDZA "v Zomba Central Hospital LILONGWE Dedza Dedza District v" Mangoche BLANTYRE CITY Hospital v" Mangochi District "v MANGOCHI Hospital NTCHEU Ntcheu Ntcheu District Hospitalv" !\ Capi Balaka District Hospital MACHINGA v" Liwonde Majo own BLANTYRE BALAKA v"Machinga District Hospital He ility "v Machinga Lake Centr ospital LIMBE "v Queen Elizabeth Chilwa ZOMBA CITY Central Hospital NENO "v Distr ospital v"Zomba Central Hospital Mwanza District Hospital SOUTHERN Refugee " ZOMBA (Numbe efugees) v BLANTYRE PHALOMBE v"Chiradzulu District Hospital MWANZA Road v" CHIRADZULU BLANTYRE CITY Ional der MULANJE Chikwawa District v" Thyolo District v" Mulanje District Region Hospital Hospital v" Hospital District CHIKWAWA THYOLO MOZAMBIQUE Popul en (People m) Bangula NSANJE ZIMBABWE Nsanje District v" Hospital The designations employed and the presentation of material in the report do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or Theof itdesignationss authorities, or conc eemployedrning the delim iandtation othef its fpresentationrontiers or boundarie sof.
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Design Study Report on the Project for Improvement of Rural Health Care Facilities in the Republic of Malawi
    Ministry of Health No. The Republic of Malawi BASIC DESIGN STUDY REPORT ON THE PROJECT FOR IMPROVEMENT OF RURAL HEALTH CARE FACILITIES IN THE REPUBLIC OF MALAWI October 2006 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY (JICA) KUME SEKKEI Co., Ltd. / EARL Consultants Inc. GM JR 06ー200 BASIC DESIGN STUDY REPORT ON THE PROJECT FOR IMPROVEMENT OF RURAL HEALTH CARE FACILITIES IN THE REPUBLIC OF MALAWI October 2006 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY (JICA) KUME SEKKEI Co., Ltd. / EARL Consultants Inc. PREFACE In response to a request from the Government of the Republic of Malawi, the Government of Japan decided to conduct a basic design study on the Project for Improvement of Rural Health Care Facilities in the Republic of Malawi and entrusted the study to the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). JICA sent to Malawi a study team from February 27 to March 25, 2006. The team held discussions with the officials concerned of the Government of Malawi, and conducted a field study at the study area. After the team returned to Japan, further studies were made. Then, a mission was sent to Malawi in order to discuss a draft basic design, and as this result, the present report was finalized. I hope that this report will contribute to the promotion of the project and to the enhancement of friendly relations between our two countries. I wish to express my sincere appreciation to the officials concerned of the Government of the Republic of Malawi for their close cooperation extended to the teams. October, 2006 Masafumi KUROKI Vice-President Japan International Cooperation Agency October, 2006 Letter of Transmittal We are pleased to submit to you the basic design study report on the Project for Improvement of Rural Health Care Facilities in the Republic of Malawi.
    [Show full text]
  • MALAWI Main Health Facilities and Population Density March 2020
    MALAWI Main Health Facilities and Population Density March 2020 Chitipa Chitipa District CHITIPA Hospital Karonga District Karonga old Hospital Hospital KARONGA Chilumba UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA RUMPHI Rumphi Rumphi District Hospital ZAMBIA NORTHERN MZUZU CITY Mzuzu Central MZUZU Hospital Nkhata Bay NKHATA BAY Nkhata Bay MZIMBA District Hospital Mzimba District Hospital LIKOMA LILONGWE CITY Lake Malawi MOZAMBIQUE Lilongwe Central Hospital Bwaila/Bottom Hospital NKHOTAKOTA KASUNGU Nkhotakota District Hospital Kasungu Kasungu District Hospital NTCHISI ZOMBA CITY Ntchisi District CENTRAL Hospital DOWA Dzaleka Refugee Camp (44,385) MCHINJI Dowa SALIMA Dowa District Salima District Mchinji District Hospital Hospital ZOMBA Hospital LILONGWE CITY ZOMBA CITY Zomba Central Hospital DEDZA LILONGWE Dedza Dedza District BLANTYRE CITY Hospital Mangoche Mangochi District ZOMBA MANGOCHI Hospital NTCHEU Ntcheu Ntcheu District Hospital BLANTYRE CITY Capital City MACHINGA CHIRADZULU Balaka District Liwonde BLANTYRE Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital Hospital Major town MOZAMBIQUE Machinga District Hospital BALAKA Refugee camp / settlement Machinga LIMBE Lake (Number of refugees) ZOMBA CITY Chilwa NENO Road Zomba Central Hospital Mwanza District Hospital SOUTHERN ZOMBA District BLANTYRE PHALOMBE THYOLO BLANTYRE Region MWANZA Chiradzulu District Hospital CHIRADZULU International border BLANTYRE CITY MULANJE Chikwawa District Health facility Hospital Thyolo District Mulanje District Hospital Hospital Central Hospital District Hospital CHIKWAWA THYOLO Population density (People per Sq. Km) < 100 Bangula 101 - 250 NSANJE 251 - 500 ZIMBABWE Nsanje District Hospital 501 - 1,000 > 1,000 The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. Creation date: 3 Apr 2020 Sources: OSM, UNCS, UNOCHA, Camps: UNHCR, Health Facilities: HDX/WHO-CDC, Population Density: Malawi NSO Feedback: [email protected] | Twitter: @UNOCHA_ROSEA | www.unocha.org/rosea | www.reliefweb.int.
    [Show full text]