DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix S3. Her Monument Types Used As a Basis For

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix S3. Her Monument Types Used As a Basis For APPENDIX S3. HER MONUMENT TYPES USED AS A BASIS FOR FUNERARY SITES WITHIN THE GRAVE GOODS DATABASE Funerary site type (HER monument type) BANK BARROW CONTRACTED LONG‐HORNED CAIRN BARROW INHUMATION MAES‐HOWE CAIRN BARROW CEMETERY CREMATION MIXED CEMETERY BELL BARROW CREMATION BURIAL MORTUARY ENCLOSURE BOWL BARROW CREMATION CEMETERY MORTUARY HOUSE BURIAL CREMATION PIT MOUND BURIAL CAIRN CROUCHED INHUMATION ORKNEY‐CROMARTY BURIAL PIT D SHAPED BARROW CAIRN CAIRN DISC BARROW OVAL BARROW CAIRN CEMETERY ENTRANCE GRAVE PASSAGE GRAVE CAIRN CIRCLE ENCLOSED CREMATION PASSAGE TOMB CAIRNFIELD CEMETERY POND BARROW CART BURIAL EXTENDED INHUMATION RING BARROW CAUSEWAYED RING DITCH FLEXED INHUMATION RING CAIRN CEMETERY FUNERAL PYRE RING DITCH CHAMBERED BARROW FUNERARY ENCLOSURE ROUND BARROW CHAMBERED LONG FUNERARY SITE SAUCER BARROW BARROW GRAVE SHORT CIST CHAMBERED CAIRN GRAVE MARKER SQUARE BARROW CHAMBERED LONG CAIRN HUMAN REMAINS STALLED CAIRN CHAMBERED ROUND INHUMATION TOMB CAIRN INHUMATION CEMETERY TOR CAIRN CHAMBERED TOMB KERB CAIRN TUMULUS CINERARY URN LONG BARROW URN CIST LONG CAIRN URNFIELD COFFIN LONG CIST _______________________________________________________________________________________________ APPENDIX S4. FUNERARY‐RELATED SEARCH TERMS USED IN FREE‐TEXT SEARCHES IN ORDER TO IDENTIFY FORMAL BURIALS BEYOND TRADITIONAL FUNERARY SITES (EG AT HILLFORTS) Search term Burial Cremation Cremated bone Human remains Grave Inhumation Skeleton Burnt bone Urn Calcined BIBLIOGRAPHY Allen, D. 1981. The excavation of a Beaker burial monument at Ravenstone, Buckinghamshire in 1978. Archaeological Journal 138(1), 72–117 Allen, T., Bates, A. & Collins, J. 2012. A Road Through the Past: Archaeological discoveries on the A2 Pepperhill to Cobham Road‐Scheme in Kent. Oxford: Oxford Archaeology Monograph 16 Andrews, P., Booth, P., Fitzpatrick, A. & Welsh, K. 2015. Digging at the Gateway: Archaeological Landscapes of South Thanet: The Archaeology of East Kent Access Phase II. Oxford: Oxford Wessex Archaeology Monograph 8 Ashbee, P. 1979. The Porth Cressa cist‐graves, St Maryʹs, Isles of Scilly: a postscript. Cornish Archaeology 18, 61– 80 Brewster, T.C.M. 1980. The Excavation of Garton and Wetwang Slacks. Wintringham: East Riding Archaeological Research Committee Prehistoric Excavation Report 2 (microfiche) Calkin, J. 1962. The Bournemouth area in the Middle and Late Bronze Age, with the ‘Deverel‐Rimbury’ problem reconsidered. Archaeological Journal 119(1), 1–91 Edgar, M. 2012. Beyond Typology: Late Iron Age and early Roman Brooches in Northern France. Unpublished PhD. University of Leicester Farley, J., Parfitt, K. & Richardson, A. 2014. A Late Iron Age helmet burial from Bridge, near Canterbury, Kent. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 80, 379–88 Fitzpatrick, A. 1997b. A 1st‐century AD ‘Durotrigian’ inhumation burial with a decorated Iron Age mirror from Portesham, Dorset. Proceedings of the Dorset Natural History & Archaeology Society 118, 51–70 Giles, M. 2012. A Forged Glamour: Landscape, identity and material culture in the Iron Age. Oxford: Windgather Greenwell, W. 1877. British Barrows: A Record of the examination of sepulchral mounds in various parts of England. Oxford: Clarendon Press Grinsell, L. 1959. Dorset Barrows. Dorchester: Dorset Natural History & Archaeological Society Hill, J.D. 2004. Excavation of an Iron Age Chariot in the Village of Wetwang, East Yorkshire in May 2001. Unpublished report. London: British Museum Jones, A., Quinnell, H., Randall, C. & Woodward, P. 2013. The Early Bronze Age enclosure at Cowleaze, Winterbourne Steepleton: New data and new interpretations. Proceedings of the Dorset Natural History & Archaeology Society 134, 164–74 Jones, A., Marley, J., Quinnell, H., Hartgroves, S., Evershed, R., Lawson‐Jones, A., Jones, S., Randall, C., Ratcliffe, L., Šoberl, L. & Taylor, R. 2011. On the beach: New discoveries at Harlyn Bay, Cornwall. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 77, 89–109 Mortimer, J. 1905. Forty Years’ Researches in British and Saxon Burial Mounds of East Yorkshire. London: A. Brown & Sons Needham, S., Parfitt, K., Varndell, G., Birchenough, A., Corke, B. & Crummy, S. 2006. The Ringlemere Cup: Precious cups and the beginning of the Channel Bronze Age. London: British Museum Research Publication 163 Owen, E. 1889. Discovery of ancient British sepulchral remains at Penmon. Archaeologia Cambrensis 6(21), 59– 63 Parfitt, K. 1998. A Late Iron Age burial from Chilham Castle, near Canterbury, Kent. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 64, 343–51 Piggott, C.M. 1938. A Middle Bronze Age Barrow and Deverel‐Rimbury Urnfield, at Latch Farm, Christchurch, Hampshire. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 4(1), 169–87 Tester, P. & Bing, H. 1949. A first century urn‐field at Cheriton, near Folkestone. Archaeologia Cantiana 62, 21– 36 Woodward, A. & Hunter, J. 2015. Ritual in EBA Grave Goods: An examination of ritual and dress equipment from Chalcolithic and EBA Graves in England. Oxford: Oxbow Books .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bronze Age Tell Communities in Context: an Exploration Into Culture
    Bronze Age Tell Kienlin This study challenges current modelling of Bronze Age tell communities in the Carpathian Basin in terms of the evolution of functionally-differentiated, hierarchical or ‘proto-urban’ society Communities in Context under the influence of Mediterranean palatial centres. It is argued that the narrative strategies employed in mainstream theorising of the ‘Bronze Age’ in terms of inevitable social ‘progress’ sets up an artificial dichotomy with earlier Neolithic groups. The result is a reductionist vision An exploration into culture, society, of the Bronze Age past which denies continuity evident in many aspects of life and reduces our understanding of European Bronze Age communities to some weak reflection of foreign-derived and the study of social types – be they notorious Hawaiian chiefdoms or Mycenaean palatial rule. In order to justify this view, this study looks broadly in two directions: temporal and spatial. First, it is asked European prehistory – Part 1 how Late Neolithic tell sites of the Carpathian Basin compare to Bronze Age ones, and if we are entitled to assume structural difference or rather ‘progress’ between both epochs. Second, it is examined if a Mediterranean ‘centre’ in any way can contribute to our understanding of Bronze Age tell communities on the ‘periphery’. It is argued that current Neo-Diffusionism has us essentialise from much richer and diverse evidence of past social and cultural realities. Tobias L. Kienlin Instead, archaeology is called on to contribute to an understanding of the historically specific expressions of the human condition and human agency, not to reduce past lives to abstract stages on the teleological ladder of social evolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Neolithic and Earlier Bronze Age Key Sites Southeast Wales – Neolithic
    A Research Framework for the Archaeology of Wales Key Sites, Southeast Wales, 22/12/2003 Neolithic and earlier Bronze Age Key Sites Southeast Wales – Neolithic and early Bronze Age 22/12/2003 Neolithic Domestic COED-Y-CWMDDA Enclosure with evidence for flint-working Owen-John 1988 CEFN GLAS (SN932024) Late Neolithic hut floor dated to 4110-70 BP. Late Neolithic flints have been found at this site. Excavated 1973 Unpublished: see Grimes 1984 PEN-Y-BONT, OGMORE (SS863756) Pottery, hearth and flints Hamilton and Aldhouse-Green 1998; 1999; Gibson 1998 MOUNT PLEASANT, NEWTON NOTTAGE (SS83387985) Hut, hearth, pottery Savory 1952; RCAHMW 1976a CEFN CILSANWS HUT SITE (SO02480995) Hut consisting of 46 stake holes found under cairn. The hut contained fragments of Mortlake style Peterborough Ware and flint flakes Webley 1958; RCAHMW 1997 CEFN BRYN 10 (GREAT CARN) SAM Gml96 (SS49029055) Trench, pit, posthole and hearth associated with Peterborough ware and worked flint; found under cairn. Ward 1987 Funerary and ritual CEFN BRYN BURIAL CHAMBER (NICHOLASTON) SAM Gml67 (SS50758881) Partly excavated chambered tomb, with an orthostatic chamber surviving in a roughly central position in what remains of a long mound. The mound was made up peaty soil and stone fragments, and no trace of an entrance passage was found. The chamber had been robbed at some time before the excavation. Williams 1940, 178-81 CEFN DRUM CHAMBERED TOMB (SN61360453,) Discovered during the course of the excavation of a deserted medieval settlement on Cefn Drum. A pear-shaped chamber of coursed rubble construction, with an attached orthostatic passage ending in a pit in the mouth of a hornwork and containing cremated bone and charcoal, were identified within the remains of a mound with some stone kerbing.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerial Investigation and Mapping of the Newgrange Landscape, Brú Na Bóinne, Co
    Aerial investigation and mapping of the Newgrange landscape, Brú na Bóinne, Co. Meath The Archaeology of the Brú na Bóinne World Heritage Site Interim Report, December 2018 This interim report has been prepared to make available the results of ongoing analysis, interpretation and mapping work in advance of full publication. The report has been produced for use on the internet. As such, the high-resolution imagery has been compressed to optimise downloading speeds. Interpretation and opinion expressed in the interim report are those of the authors. Printed copies of the report will be made available as soon as is practicable following the release of this digital version. Adjustments may be made to the final publication text subject to the availability of information at that time. NOTE Virtually all of the sites featured in this report are located on private land. These are working farms with both crops and livestock. There is no entry onto these lands without the express permission of the landowners. Furthermore, the sites are mostly subsurface and can only be seen as cropmarks. There are extensive views across the floodplain from Newgrange Passage Tomb, which can be accessed via the OPW Brú na Bóinne Visitor Centre. Details of on-line booking for the Brú na Bóinne Visitor Centre and guided tour of Newgrange are available at: http://www.heritageireland.ie/en/midlands-eastcoast/brunaboinnevisitorcentre/ Cover image: View across the Geometric Henge, looking north towards Newgrange Farm. © Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht
    [Show full text]
  • Stone-Cist Grave at Kaseküla, Western Estonia, in the Light of Ams Dates of the Human Bones
    Estonian Journal of Archaeology, 2012, 16, 2, 91–117 doi: 10.3176/arch.2012.2.01 Margot Laneman STONE-CIST GRAVE AT KASEKÜLA, WESTERN ESTONIA, IN THE LIGHT OF AMS DATES OF THE HUMAN BONES The article discusses new AMS dates of the human bones at stone-cist grave I at Kaseküla, western Estonia, in the context of previously existent radiocarbon dates, artefact finds and osteological studies. There are altogether 12 radiocarbon dates for 10 inhumations (i.e. roughly a third of all burials) of the grave, provided by two laboratories. The dates suggest three temporally separated periods in the use life of the grave(s): the Late Bronze Age, the Pre-Roman Iron Age and the Late Iron Age. In the latter period, the grave was probably reserved for infant burials only. Along with chronological issues, the article discusses the apparently unusual structure of the grave and compares two competing osteological studies of the grave’s bone assemblage from an archaeologist’s point of view. Margot Laneman, Institute of History and Archaeology, University of Tartu, 18 Ülikooli St., 50090 Tartu, Estonia; [email protected] Introduction The main aim of this article is to present and discuss new radiocarbon (AMS) dates of the human bones collected from stone-cist grave I at Kaseküla, western Estonia. The stone-cist grave was excavated by Mati Mandel in 1973 with the purpose of specifying the settlement history of the region (Mandel 1975). So far it has remained the only excavated stone-cist grave in mainland western Estonia (Mandel 2003, fig. 20). Excavation also uncovered a Late Neolithic settlement site beneath the grave, which was further investigated by Aivar Kriiska in 1997 (Kriiska et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Megalithic Astronomy in South India
    In Nakamura, T., Orchiston, W., Sôma, M., and Strom, R. (eds.), 2011. Mapping the Oriental Sky. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Oriental Astronomy. Tokyo, National Astronomical Observatory of Japan. Pp. xx-xx. MEGALITHIC ASTRONOMY IN SOUTH INDIA Srikumar M. MENON Faculty of Architecture, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal – 576104, Karnataka, India. E-mail: [email protected] and Mayank N. VAHIA Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai, India, and Manipal Advanced Research Group, Manipal University, Manipal – 576104, Karnataka, India. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: The megalithic monuments of peninsular India, believed to have been erected in the Iron Age (1500BC – 200AD), can be broadly categorized into sepulchral and non-sepulchral in purpose. Though a lot of work has gone into the study of these monuments since Babington first reported megaliths in India in 1823, not much is understood about the knowledge systems extant in the period when these were built – in science and engineering, and especially in mathematics and astronomy. We take a brief look at the archaeological understanding of megaliths, before making a detailed assessment of a group of megaliths in the south Canara region of Karnataka State in South India that were hitherto assumed to be haphazard clusters of menhirs. Our surveys have indicated that there is a positive correlation of sight-lines with sunrise and sunset points on the horizon for both summer and winter solstices. We identify five such monuments in the region and present the survey results for one of these sites, demonstrating their astronomical implications. We also discuss the possible use of megaliths in the form of stone alignments/ avenues as calendar devices.
    [Show full text]
  • Plym Valley Connections Heritage Lottery Fund Project
    Designers of the London 2012 Olympic Parklands PLYM VALLEY CONNECTIONS HERITAGE LOTTERY FUND PROJECT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER AND HERITAGE ASSESSMENT AUGUST 2013 CONTENTS 1.0 FOREWORD 5 2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8 3.0 INTRODUCTION 10 4.0 APPROACH TO THE LCHA 12 5.0 METHODOLOGY 14 5.1. Guidance and Sources of Information 14 5.2. Study Area 15 6.0 OVERVIEW OF ASSESSMENT THEMES 16 6.1. Introduction 16 6.2. Physical Landscape and Natural Heritage 16 6.3. Cultural Heritage 22 6.4. People, Access and Places 30 6.5. Drivers for Change 33 7.0 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER AREAS 34 1. Coastal and Tidal Waters Landscape Character Type 36 2. Open Coastal Plateau and Cliffs Landscape Character Type 42 3. Lowland Plain Landscape Character Type 44 4. Wooded Valley and Farmland Landscape Character Type 46 5. Upland Fringes Landscape Character Type 54 6. Upland Moorland Landscape Character Type 62 7. Urban Landscape Character type 64 8.0 PROPOSED HLF BOUNDARY AND CONSIDERATIONS 66 9.0 CONCLUSIONS 68 APPENDICES 71 Appendix 1. Workshop Summary Findings Appendix 2. List of Significant Heritage Assets Appendix 3. Gazetteer of Environmental Assets Appendix 4. Landscape Character Overview FIGURES 4 1.0 FOREWORD “The longer one stays here the more does the spirit of the moor sink into one’s soul, its vastness, and also its grim charm. When you are once out upon its bosom you have left all traces of modern England behind you, but, on the other hand, you are conscious everywhere of the homes and the work of the prehistoric people.
    [Show full text]
  • Ume 10, -U Ser
    Volume 10, -u ser . - 1968 Editors EDWARD S. DEEVEY a-- RICHARD FOSTER FLINT J. GORDON OGDEN, III _ IRVINg ROUSE Managing Editor RENEE S. KRA YALE UNIVERSITY NEW HAVEN, CONNECT.IC U l"ii)fl h d IiV r E AT\As g'LyyEi.. R C N, / r..? i.NA .3 8. ComIlient, usually corn ; fOg the date with other relevant dates, for each ,Ttdterial, silil"iiliari ing t e signitic.ance ant Sillpllilt 3't(i"r ing t., t t e radiocarbon t was i' itl ii73kinz 'P;.5 lit;re, i'; till teelmital :i"it.' i°_i , e.g. the iral lthout subscribers at $50.0( * Suggestions to authors of the reprints o the United Suites Geological Survey, 5th ed., Vashington, D. C., 1958 jc.=oscrxwxcn.t Panting ()ihce, $1.75). Volume 10, Number 1 - 1968 RADIOCARBON Published by THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE Editors EDWARD S. DEEVEY- RICHARD FOSTER FLINT J. GORDON OGDEN, III - IRVING ROUSE Managing Editor RENEE S. KRA YALE UNIVERSITY NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT VOL. 1 10, No. Radiocarbon 1965 CONTENTS Il1I Barker and John lackey British Museum Natural Radiocarbon Measurements V 1 BONN H. IV. Scharpenseel, F. Pietig, and M. A. Tawcrs Bonn Radiocarbon Measurements I ............................................... IRPA Anne Nicole Schreurs Institut Royal du Patrimoine Artistirlue Radiocarbon Dates I ........ 9 Lu Soren Hkkansson University of Lund Radiocarbon Dates I Lv F. Gilot Louvain Natural Radiocarbon Measurements VI ..................... 55 1I H. R. Crane and J. B. Griffin University of Michigan. Radiocarbon Dates NII 61 N PL IV. J. Callow and G. I. Hassall National Physical Laboratory Radiocarbon Measurements V ..........
    [Show full text]
  • Prehistoric Activities in Megalithic Graves in Falbygden, Sweden by MALOU BLANK
    Prehistoric Activities in Megalithic Graves in Falbygden, Sweden BY MALOU BLANK Abstract The different types of use of megalithic graves are discussed in this article. Based on new AMS analyses and the re-examination of materials from excavated graves in Falbygden, a multitude of later modifications and activities are demonstrated. A long-term perspective of the use of dolmens, passage graves and the less studied gallery graves is applied and it is shown that the extent as well as the location of activity differed during the various periods. In this study, it is argued that the reuse of megalithic graves occurs more often than previously described and also that times of abandonment needs to be considered. The analyses indicate that despite similarities to several megalithic areas in Sweden, the prehistory of Falbygden is unique. In contrast to other regions, there is a significant level of megalithic reuse during the second part of the Late Neolithic. The results imply that the monumentality of the graves, which has often been claimed in previous research, is of less importance. Instead, megalithic graves were transformed through time and adapted to the prevailing practices. Introduction The prehistoric reuse of graves and monuments of the graves (Tilley 1994; Bradley 2002; is a well-known phenomenon which has been van Dyke & Alcock 2003; Arwill-Nordbladh recognized in many parts of Europe (Leclerc 2013). This study emphasizes the importance & Masset 1980; Hingley 1996; Holtorf of including reused graves in archaeological 1998; Billard et al. 2010). Although the research, in order to gain a more complete reuse of older graves is noted, its potential for understanding of prehistoric societies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Landscape Archaeology of Martin Down
    The Landscape Archaeology of Martin Down Martin Down and the surrounding area contain a variety of well‐preserved archaeological remains, largely because the area has been unaffected by modern agriculture and development. This variety of site types and the quality of their preservation are relatively unusual in the largely arable landscapes of central southern England. Bokerley Dyke, Grim's Ditch, the short section of medieval park boundary bank and the two bowl barrows west of Grim's Ditch, form the focus of the Martin Down archaeological landscape and, as such, have been the subject of part excavations and a detailed survey by the Royal Commission on the Historical Monuments of England. These investigations have provided much information about the nature and development of early land division, agriculture and settlement within this area during the later prehistoric and historic periods. See attached map for locations of key sites A ritual Neolithic Landscape….. Feature 1. The Dorset Cursus The Cursus dates from 3300 BCE which makes it contemporary with the earthen long barrows on Cranborne Chase: many of these are found near, on, or within the Cursus and since they are still in existence they help trace the Cursus' course in the modern landscape. The relationship between the Cursus and the alignment of these barrows suggests that they had a common ritual significance to the Neolithic people who spent an estimated 0.5 million worker‐hours in its construction. A cursus circa 6.25 miles (10 kilometres) long which runs roughly southwest‐northeast between Thickthorn Down and Martin Down. Narrow and roughly parallel‐sided, it follows a slightly sinuous course across the chalk downland, crossing a river and several valleys.
    [Show full text]
  • Ever Increasing Circles: the Sacred Geographies of Stonehenge and Its Landscape
    Proceedings of the British Academy, 92, 167-202 Ever Increasing Circles: The Sacred Geographies of Stonehenge and its Landscape TIMOTHY DARVILL Introduction THE GREAT STONE CIRCLE standing on the rolling chalk downland of Salisbury Plain that we know today as Stonehenge, has, in the twentieth century AD, become a potent icon for the ancient world, and the focus of power struggles and contested authority in our own. Its reputation and stature as an archaeological monument are enormous, and sometimes almost threaten to overshadow both its physical proportions and our accumu- lated collective understanding of its construction and use. While considerable attention has recently been directed to the relevance, meaning and use of the site in the twentieth century AD (Chippindale 1983; 1986a; Chippindale et al. 1990; Bender 1992), the matter of its purpose, significance, and operation during Neolithic and Bronze Age times remains obscure. The late Professor Richard Atkinson was characteristically straightforward when he said that for questions about Stonehenge which begin with the word ‘why’: ‘there is one short, simple and perfectly correct answer: We do not know’ (1979, 168). Two of the most widely recognised and enduring interpretations of Stonehenge are, first, that it was a temple of some kind; and, second, that its orientation on the midsummer sunrise gave it some sort of astronomical role in the lives of its builders. Both interpre- tations, which are not mutually exclusive, have of course been taken to absurd lengths on occasion. During the eighteenth century, for example, William Stukeley became obses- sive about the role of the Druids at Stonehenge (Stukeley 1740).
    [Show full text]
  • Oxford Handbooks Online
    Mortuary Practices, Bodies and Persons in Northern Europe Oxford Handbooks Online Mortuary Practices, Bodies and Persons in Northern Europe Karl-Göran Sjögren The Oxford Handbook of Neolithic Europe (Forthcoming) Edited by Chris Fowler, Jan Harding, and Daniela Hofmann Subject: Archaeology, Archaeology of Europe, Prehistoric Archaeology Online Publication Date: May DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199545841.013.017 2014 Abstract and Keywords This chapter provides a brief overview of practices involving human remains during the period c. 4000–2200 BC in northern Europe, with an emphasis on Denmark and southern Sweden. Finds of human bones come from a number of different contexts, such as monumental and earthen graves, mortuary houses, bog finds, causewayed camps, and settlements. Some of these remains may be the product of specific stages in extended mortuary processes, while others probably result from different kinds of practices. The interpretation of megalithic tombs as ossuaries is reviewed critically, and an alternative interpretation, primary burial with subsequent handling of selected bones, is preferred. Recent evidence from eastern Sweden, indicating more complex mortuary practices than usually envisaged for the middle Neolithic in this area, is discussed briefly. This includes the practice of cremation, indications of secondary burial, and the discovery of probable mortuary houses. Keywords: Denmark, Sweden, Neolithic, mortuary practices, megalithic tombs, cremations, mortuary houses Introduction This chapter provides a brief overview of practices involving human remains during the period c. 4000–2200 BC in northern Europe, with an emphasis on southern Scandinavia, that is, Denmark and southern Sweden. There are two main reasons for this limited focus. First, most of northern Europe is made up of primary, crystalline rocks, such as granites or gneisses, where preservation of unburnt human bone is generally poor.
    [Show full text]
  • The Long Barrows and Long Mounds of West Mendip
    Proc. Univ. Bristol Spelaeol. Soc., 2008, 24 (3), 187-206 THE LONG BARROWS AND LONG MOUNDS OF WEST MENDIP by JODIE LEWIS ABSTRACT This article considers the evidence for Early Neolithic long barrow construction on the West Mendip plateau, Somerset. It highlights the difficulties in assigning long mounds a classification on surface evidence alone and discusses a range of earthworks which have been confused with long barrows. Eight possible long barrows are identified and their individual and group characteristics are explored and compared with national trends. Gaps in the local distribution of these monuments are assessed and it is suggested that areas of absence might have been occupied by woodland during the Neolithic. The relationship between long barrows and later round barrows is also considered. INTRODUCTION Long barrows are amongst the earliest monuments to have been built in the Neolithic period. In Southern Britain they take two forms: non-megalithic (or “earthen”) long barrows and megalithic barrows, mostly belonging to the Cotswold-Severn tradition. Despite these differences in architectural construction, the long mounds are of the same, early 4th millennium BC, date and had a similar purpose. The chambers of the long mounds were used for the deposition of the human dead and the monuments themselves appear to have acted as a focus for ritual activities and religious observations by the living. Some long barrows show evidence of fire lighting, feasting and deposition in the forecourts and ditches of the monuments, and alignment upon solstice events has also been noted. A local example of this can be observed at Stoney Littleton, near Bath, where the entrance and passage of this chambered long barrow are aligned upon the midwinter sunrise1.
    [Show full text]