DOCSLIB.ORG

Project Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Project Document United Nations Development Programme Project Document Project title: Enhancing financial sustainability of the Protected Area system in Georgia Country: Implementing Partner: Management Arrangements: Georgia Ministry of Environmental Protection and National Implementation Modality Agriculture (MoEPA)/ Agency of (NIM) with Country Office support Protected Areas (APA) UNSPF/Country Programme Outcome: By 2020, communities enjoy greater resilience through enhanced institutional and legislative systems for environment protection, sustainable management of natural resources and disaster risk reduction1. UNDP Strategic Plan Output: 1.4.1 Solutions scaled up for sustainable management of natural resources, including sustainable commodities and green and inclusive value chains UNDP Social and Environmental Screening Category: UNDP Gender Marker: GEN2 Low Atlas Project ID (formerly Award ID): 00089759 Atlas Output ID (formerly Project ID): 00095873 UNDP-GEF PIMS ID number: 6138 GEF ID number: 9879 Planned start date: October 1, 2018 Planned end date: September 30, 2023 PAC meeting date : TBD Brief project description: Georgia’s recent socio-economic transition was accompanied by unsustainable economic activities and over-use of biological resources, driven by poverty, lack of alternative livelihoods, irresponsible exploitation, ignorance on nature’s values, and ineffective legislation. Today, Georgia is one of the few countries globally where protected areas are a genuine high level national priority. Significant progress is made with the expansion of the PA network in the past decades, supported by legislative-institutional reforms, and the country is committed to increase the area under formal protection to 20% protection (from current 8%) in the next 8 years. Despite 1 United Nations Office in Georgia, 2016. United Nations Partnership for Sustainable Development (framework document) – Georgia 2016-2020. UN House, Tbilisi, Georgia, 56 pp. 1 | P a g e progress made, threats to globally significant biodiversity in Georgia from socio-economic development as well as climate change are exacerbated by ineffective implementation and enforcement of legislation and policies on PAs. Remaining barriers to an effective and efficient PA system are addressed under three components: (i) sufficient, secure and predictable revenue sources ensure sustainable PA operations; (ii) improved management effectiveness of PAs; and (iii) improved awareness of Protected Area values. With GEF incremental support, CNF’s 2030 Sinking Fund will until 2030 annually provide $950,000 to 12 Target PAs, supporting operating costs, site-level TA and capacity building, on financial-administrative planning, budgeting and accounting, tourism development, management effectiveness assessment, and operational management. Awareness raising improves societal acceptance and support of PAs. The project will close the annual funding gap by $1.15 mln; increase CNF’s co-financing to Target PAs until 2030 by $4.35 mln over the baseline, matched by government funding; increase CAS, METT and Financial Scorecards; and expand support to 12 Target Key Biodiversity Areas, covering 431,872 ha. Project costs are estimated at $9,958,516, including $1,826,484 from GEF and $7,958,516 co-financing from MoEPA ($4,750,000), CNF ($3,008,516) and Bank of Georgia ($200,000). FINANCING PLAN GEF Trust Fund USD 1,826,484 UNDP TRAC resources USD 0 Cash co-financing to be administered by UNDP USD 0 (1) Total Budget administered by UNDP USD 1,826,484 PARALLEL CO-FINANCING Government US$ 4,750,000 Caucasus Nature Fund US$ 3,008,516 Bank of Georgia US$ 200,000 (2) Total co-financing US$ 7,958,516 (3) Grand-Total Project Financing (1)+(2) US$ 9,785,000 SIGNATURES Signature: print name below Agreed by Date/Month/Year: Government Signature: print name below Agreed by Date/Month/Year: Implementing Partner Signature: print name below Agreed by UNDP Date/Month/Year: 2 Table of Contents I. Acronyms and abbreviations ............................................................................................................................. 4 II. Development Challenge ..................................................................................................................................... 6 III. Strategy ............................................................................................................................................................ 11 IV. Results and Partnerships.................................................................................................................................. 14 V. Project Management ....................................................................................................................................... 28 VI. Project Results Framework .............................................................................................................................. 30 VII. Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) Plan ........................................................................................................... 34 VIII. Governance and Management Arrangements ................................................................................................ 38 IX. Financial Planning and Management ............................................................................................................... 43 X. Total Budget and Work Plan ............................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. XI. Legal Context ................................................................................................................................................... 49 XII. Risk Management ............................................................................................................................................ 50 XIII. Annexes ............................................................................................................................................................ 52 Annex A: Multi Year Work Plan ............................................................................................................................... 53 Annex B: GEF Tracking Tool at baseline .................................................................................................................. 55 Annex C: Overview of Technical Consultancies ....................................................................................................... 56 Annex D: Terms of Reference of Project Management Staff .................................................................................. 67 Annex E: UNDP Social and Environmental Screening Template ............................................................................. 70 Annex F: Stakeholder Engagement Plan ................................................................................................................. 81 Annex G: Gender Analysis and Action Plan ............................................................................................................. 86 Annex H: UNDP Risk Log .......................................................................................................................................... 91 Annex I: Project Theory of Change .......................................................................................................................... 94 Annex J: System of Protected Areas in Georgia (2017) ........................................................................................... 97 Annex K: Institutional arrangements of the PA system in Georgia ......................................................................... 99 Annex L: Summary of KBA criteria applicable to target Protected Areas in Georgia ............................................ 101 Annex M: Biodiversity profile of target Protected Areas in Georgia ..................................................................... 103 Annex N: Approach towards strengthening domestic revenue streams for target PAs in Georgia ................ 109 Annex O: Monitoring Plan ..................................................................................................................................... 117 Annex P: Evaluation Plan ....................................................................................................................................... 121 Annex Q: Project Quality Assurance Report, completed in UNDP online corporate planning system ................. 121 Annex R: HACT assessment of CNF ....................................................................................................................... 121 Annex S: Letter of Agreement for Support Services.............................................................................................. 121 3 I. ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS APA Agency of Protected Areas AWP Annual Work Plans BMZ German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development CAS Capacity Assessment Scorecard CBD Convention on Biological Diversity CI Conservation International CO Country Office CNF Caucasus Nature Fund CzDA Czech Development Agency ECP Eco-region Conservation Plan for the Caucasus EOP End-of-project ERC Evaluation Resource Center ESMP Environmental and Social Management Plan ESV Ecosystem Services Valuation EU European Union FFI Fauna and Flora International FIF Financial Investment Funds GDI Gender Development Index GEF Global Environment Facility GGI Gender Gap Index GII Gender Inequality Index GIZ Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Batumi Guidebook.Pdf
    About Georgia 10 10 О Грузии General Information 10 11 Краткая информация о Грузии About Ajara 13 13 Аджария General Information 13 13 Краткая информация об Аджарии Population 14 15 Население Nature - Geography 14 14 Природа – география Climate 14 15 Климат Flora and Fauna 16 16 Флора и фауна Protected Areas 16 16 Охраняемые территории Kobuleti Protected Areas 16 18 Охраняемые территории Кобулети Kintrishi Protected Areas 16 18 Кинтришская охраняемая территория Mtirala National Park 19 19 Национальный парк Мтирала Machakhela Transboundary Protected Areas 21 21 Трансграничная охраняемая территория Мачахела Natural Treasures 21 21 Природные богатства Botanical Garden 21 21 Ботанический сад Green Lake (“Mtsvane Tba”) 22 22 Озеро Мцване Goderdzi Petried Forest 22 22 Ископаемый лес Годердзи Coastal Sand Dunes 22 22 Прибрежные песчаные дюны History 24 25 История History of Ajara (Review) 24 25 Исторический обзор Аджарии Ajara as an Autonomous Republic Аджария как автономная республика within Georgia 27 27 в составе Грузии Religion and Traditions 28 28 Религия и традиции Christian Orthodoxy in Ajara 28 28 Православие в Аджарии Other Religious Denominations in Ajara 28 28 Другие религии и конфессии в Грузии Religious Monuments 30 30 Религиозные памятники Cuisine 40 39 Кухня Ajarian Cuisine 40 40 Аджарская кухня Ajarian Wine 40 40 Аджарское вино Culture and Art 43 42 Искусство и культура Architecture 43 43 Архитектура Arched Bridges 44 44 Арочные мосты Archaeology 47 47 Археология Craft 48 49 Ремесла Folklore 51 51 Фольклор Theatres, Cinema, Circus
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus
    STATUS AND PROTECTION OF GLOBALLY THREATENED SPECIES IN THE CAUCASUS CEPF Biodiversity Investments in the Caucasus Hotspot 2004-2009 Edited by Nugzar Zazanashvili and David Mallon Tbilisi 2009 The contents of this book do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of CEPF, WWF, or their sponsoring organizations. Neither the CEPF, WWF nor any other entities thereof, assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, product or process disclosed in this book. Citation: Zazanashvili, N. and Mallon, D. (Editors) 2009. Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus. Tbilisi: CEPF, WWF. Contour Ltd., 232 pp. ISBN 978-9941-0-2203-6 Design and printing Contour Ltd. 8, Kargareteli st., 0164 Tbilisi, Georgia December 2009 The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conservation International, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan, the MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. This book shows the effort of the Caucasus NGOs, experts, scientific institutions and governmental agencies for conserving globally threatened species in the Caucasus: CEPF investments in the region made it possible for the first time to carry out simultaneous assessments of species’ populations at national and regional scales, setting up strategies and developing action plans for their survival, as well as implementation of some urgent conservation measures. Contents Foreword 7 Acknowledgments 8 Introduction CEPF Investment in the Caucasus Hotspot A. W. Tordoff, N. Zazanashvili, M. Bitsadze, K. Manvelyan, E. Askerov, V. Krever, S. Kalem, B. Avcioglu, S. Galstyan and R. Mnatsekanov 9 The Caucasus Hotspot N.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Resilience to Climate Change in South Caucasus Agriculture Ahouissoussi, Neumann, and Srivastava the WORLD BANK
    Building Resilience to Climate Change in South Caucasus Agriculture Change in South Caucasus Climate to Building Resilience DIRECTIONS IN DEVELOPMENT Agriculture and Rural Development Ahouissoussi, Neumann, and Srivastava Neumann, and Srivastava Ahouissoussi, Building Resilience to Climate Change in South Caucasus Agriculture Nicolas Ahouissoussi, James E. Neumann, and Jitendra P. Srivastava, Editors THE WORLD BANK Building Resilience to Climate Change in South Caucasus Agriculture DIRECTIONS IN DEVELOPMENT Agriculture and Rural Development Building Resilience to Climate Change in South Caucasus Agriculture Nicolas Ahouissoussi, James E. Neumann, and Jitendra P. Srivastava, Editors © 2014 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW, Washington DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000; Internet: www.worldbank.org Some rights reserved 1 2 3 4 17 16 15 14 This work is a product of the staff of The World Bank with external contributions. The findings, interpreta- tions, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of The World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Nothing herein shall constitute or be considered to be a limitation upon or waiver of the privileges and immunities of The World Bank, all of which are specifically reserved. Rights and Permissions This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO) http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia Environmental Performance Reviews Third Review
    UNECE Georgia Environmental Performance Reviews Third Review UNITED NATIONS ECE/CEP/177 UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE REVIEWS GEORGIA Third Review UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 2016 Environmental Performance Reviews Series No. 43 NOTE Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. In particular, the boundaries shown on the maps do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. The United Nations issued the second Environmental Performance Review of Georgia (Environmental Performance Reviews Series No. 30) in 2010. This volume is issued in English only. ECE/CEP/177 UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales E.16.II.E.3 ISBN 978-92-1-117101-3 e-ISBN 978-92-1-057683-3 ISSN 1020-4563 iii Foreword It is essential to monitor progress towards environmental sustainability and to evaluate how countries reconcile environmental and economic targets and meet their international environmental commitments. Through regular monitoring and evaluation, countries may more effectively stay ahead of emerging environmental issues, improve their environmental performance and be accountable to their citizens. The ECE Environmental Performance Review Programme provides valuable assistance to member States by regularly assessing their environmental performance so that they can take steps to improve their environmental management, integrate environmental considerations into economic sectors, increase the availability of information to the public and promote information exchange with other countries on policies and experiences.
    [Show full text]
  • Contribution to Mycobiotic of Algeti National Park (East Georgia): Fungi on the Woody Plants
    saqarTvelos mecnierebaTa erovnuli akademiis moambe, t. 4, #1, 2010 BULLETIN OF THE GEORGIAN NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, vol. 4, no. 1, 2010 Botanics Contribution to Mycobiotic of Algeti National Park (East Georgia): Fungi on the Woody Plants † Irma Murvanishvili* , Angelina Jorjadze*, Nino Gotsadze* * Tbilisi Botanical Garden and Institute of Botany, Tbilisi (Presented by Academy Member G. Nakhutsrishvili) ABSTRACT. The paper presents the fungi on woody plants, which have been found in the Algeti National Park. At present 228 species of fungi are revealed on various plants, of which 131 are macrofungi and 97 micromycetes. © 2010 Bull. Georg. Natl. Acad. Sci. Key words: fungi, woody plants, Algeti National Park. The Algeti National Park is located on the southern and bushes); botanists call the southern slopes of the slopes of the East Trialeti range, at the source of the Trialeti range a “floristic junction”, since one could find Algeti river. The Algeti Nature Reserve was established here flora of Colchian, Hircanian, Iberian, Caucasian, in 1965 with the purpose of protecting the southeastern Middle Eastern, Persian and other origin [1, 2]. border of distribution of eastern spruce (Picea orientalis During field studies (2006 - 2008) and on the basis of (L.) Link). In 2007 it was given a status of the National the Herbarium of Tbilisi Botanical Garden and Institute of Park. 6044 ha of the Algeti National Park is covered with Botany, and according to the literature data [3-6], 228 spe- forests. Among them fir trees occupy - 1442 ha, beech - cies of fungi on various plants were identified. Of these 2250 ha, oaks - 1380 ha, pines - 250 ha, hornbeams - 120 131 species are macromycetes and 97 - micromycetes.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Action Plan
    Environmental and Social Impact Assessment – Part 6 Project Number: 47919 April 2014 GEO: Adjaristsqali Hydropower Project Prepared by Mott MacDonald and Adjaristsqali Georgia LLC for the Asian Development Bank The environmental impact assessment is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “Terms of Use” section of this website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Biodiversity Action Plan Adjaristsqali Hydropower Cascade Project December 2013 Adjaristsqali Georgia LLC Biodiversity290039 EVT Action EMS 01Plan A http://pims01/pims/llisapi.dll/open/1516754514 1 November 2012 Adjaristsqali Hydropower Cascade Project December 2013 Adjaristsqali Georgia LLC 1. Abashidze Street 6, 6010 Batumi, Georgia Mott MacDonald, Demeter House, Station Road, Cambridge CB1 2RS, United Kingdom t +44 (0)1223 463500 f +44 (0)1223 461007, www.mottmac.com Biodiversity Action Plan Issue and revision record Revision Date Originator Checker Approver Description A 2/11/2012 Celia Figueira Vanessa Hovland Caroline McParland Draft for client review Mihai Coroi Tristan Folland Róisín Ní Mhathúna B 29/11/2012 Mihai Coroi Vanessa Hovland Final Draft
    [Show full text]
  • Field Guide – Common Trees and Shrubs of Georgia
    Introduction Up to 400 species of trees and shrubs grow in Georgian for- ests. This Field Guide contains information about 100 species of trees and shrubs from 38 plant families. The abundance of relict and endemic timber species (61 species endemic to Geor- gia and 43 species endemic to the Caucasus) indicates the high biodiversity of Georgian forests. Georgian forests provide habitats and migration corridors to a range of wild fauna, and play an important role in the conserva- tion of the genetic diversity of animal species in the region. In conditions of complex and deeply dissected relief, characteristic to Georgia, forests are especially important due to their climate regulation, water regulation and soil protection functions. Forests also ensure the continuous delivery of vital benefits and resources to the population, and facilitate the development of a range of industries. Introduction In this Field Guide each plant family is displayed in a different color. The Field Guide contains an alphabetical index of species, as well as the names of species in Latin and English, as estab- lished by the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature. The Field Guide also contains a brief description of the taxo- nomic characteristics, range and protection status of each spe- cies. Alphabetical Index Name in English Name in Latin # Alpine Currant Ribes alpinum 59 Bay Laurel Laurus nobilis 62 Begonia-Leafed Lime Tilia Begoniifolia 92 Bitchvinta Pine Pinus pithyusa 6 Black Alder Alnus barbata 28 Black Elder Sambucus nigra 31 Black Poplar Populus
    [Show full text]
  • Wikivoyage Georgia.Pdf
    WikiVoyage Georgia March 2016 Contents 1 Georgia (country) 1 1.1 Regions ................................................ 1 1.2 Cities ................................................. 1 1.3 Other destinations ........................................... 1 1.4 Understand .............................................. 2 1.4.1 People ............................................. 3 1.5 Get in ................................................. 3 1.5.1 Visas ............................................. 3 1.5.2 By plane ............................................ 4 1.5.3 By bus ............................................. 4 1.5.4 By minibus .......................................... 4 1.5.5 By car ............................................. 4 1.5.6 By train ............................................ 5 1.5.7 By boat ............................................ 5 1.6 Get around ............................................... 5 1.6.1 Taxi .............................................. 5 1.6.2 Minibus ............................................ 5 1.6.3 By train ............................................ 5 1.6.4 By bike ............................................ 5 1.6.5 City Bus ............................................ 5 1.6.6 Mountain Travel ....................................... 6 1.7 Talk .................................................. 6 1.8 See ................................................... 6 1.9 Do ................................................... 7 1.10 Buy .................................................. 7 1.10.1
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Erosion of Crop Varieties and Plant Resources in the Central Great Caucasus
    Maia Akhalkatsi AMIES II –G2: Agrobiodiversity and Genetic Erosion of Crop Varieties and Plant Resources in the Central Great Caucasus Center for Ivane Javakhishvili Agricultural International Development Tbilisi State Ilia State University and Environmental University University Research of Georgia Genetic Erosion of Crop Varieties Study site is located at Kazbegi Municipality and located in the Central Great Caucasus at an altitude between 1250 and 5047 m a.s.l. Kazbegi Mt. Kazbegi 5033 m Georgia Genetic Erosion of Crop Varieties Agriculture of this area is extreme internal variability and complexity, with a multiplicity of highly localized providing the habitats and agricultural lands for much genetic erosion of crop varieties, animals, plants, fungi, and other life forms for wild plant resources. Genetic Erosion of Crop Varieties History of Agriculture of Georgia The ancient findings from Neolithic period of cereal grains in Georgia were discovered: 1. Trialeti Range, Tsalka district; 2. Kvemo Kartli region: Arukhlo and Shulaveri excavations, Dmanisi and Bolnisi districts; 3. Samegrelo region: Dikha-Gudzuba and Nokalakevi; 4.. Imereti Region, Dzudzuana cave; 5. Kakheti, Nelkarisi. Genetic Erosion of Crop Varieties Crops of the Neolithic period • The following crops were found in these archaeological excavations: • Seven species of cultivated wheat - Triticum aestivum, T. spelta, T. carthlicum, T. macha, T. monococcum, T. dicoccum, T. compactum and one wild relative Aegilops cylindrica. • Other cereals: millet - Panicum milleaceaum,
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus
    STATUS AND PROTECTION OF GLOBALLY THREATENED SPECIES IN THE CAUCASUS CEPF Biodiversity Investments in the Caucasus Hotspot 2004-2009 Edited by Nugzar Zazanashvili and David Mallon Tbilisi 2009 The contents of this book do not necessarily re ect the views or policies of CEPF, WWF, or their sponsoring organizations. Neither the CEPF, WWF nor any other entities thereof, assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, product or process disclosed in this book. Citation: Zazanashvili, N. and Mallon, D. (Editors) 2009. Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus. Tbilisi: CEPF, WWF. Contour Ltd., 232 pp. ISBN 978-9941-0-2203-6 Design and printing Contour Ltd. 8, Kargareteli st., 0164 Tbilisi, Georgia December 2009 The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conservation International, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan, the MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. This book shows the effort of the Caucasus NGOs, experts, scienti c institutions and governmental agencies for conserving globally threatened species in the Caucasus: CEPF investments in the region made it possible for the rst time to carry out simultaneous assessments of species’ populations at national and regional scales, setting up strategies and developing action plans for their survival, as well as implementation of some urgent conservation measures. Contents Foreword 7 Acknowledgments 8 Introduction CEPF Investment in the Caucasus Hotspot A. W. Tordoff, N. Zazanashvili, M. Bitsadze, K. Manvelyan, E. Askerov, V. Krever, S. Kalem, B. Avcioglu, S. Galstyan and R. Mnatsekanov 9 The Caucasus Hotspot N.
    [Show full text]
  • A Revision of Geostiba of the West Palaearctic Region. XXVII
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Linzer biologische Beiträge Jahr/Year: 2019 Band/Volume: 0051_2 Autor(en)/Author(s): Assing Volker Artikel/Article: A revision of Geostiba of the West Palaearctic region. XXVII. New species from Georgia and Kyrgyzstan, and additional records (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Aleocharinae) 717-730 Linzer biol. Beitr. 51/2 717-730 20.12.2019 A revision of Geostiba of the West Palaearctic region. XXVII. New species from Georgia and Kyrgyzstan, and additional records (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Aleocharinae) Volker ASSING A b s t r a c t : Five species of Geostiba THOMSON, 1858 from Georgia and East Kyrgyzstan are described and illustrated: Geostiba (Tropogastrosipalia) simplicicollis nov.sp. (Georgia: Kakheti); G. (Sibiota) kakhetiana nov.sp. (Georgia: Kakheti); G. (S.) frischi nov.sp. (Kyrgyzstan: Issyk-Kul); G. (S.) prominens nov.sp. (Kyrgyzstan: Issyk- Kul); G. (S.) dentata nov.sp. (Kyrgyzstan: Issyk-Kul). Based on a study of recently collected material, Geostiba zerchei PACE, 1996 is moved from the subgenus Sibiota CASEY, 1906 to Sipalotricha SCHEERPELTZ, 1931; the male sexual characters of this previously doubtful taxon are described and illustrated for the first time. Additional records of eight species are reported from the Caucasus region. K e y w o r d s : Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Aleocharinae, Geostibini, Geostiba, Caucasus region, Georgia, Middle Asia, Kyrgyzstan, new subgeneric assignment, new species, new records. Introduction The Caucasian fauna of the speciose genus Geostiba THOMSON, 1858 has been addressed in several previous contributions (ASSING 2005, 2016a, b, 2017a, c, 2018). As many as 46 species had been recorded from the region including Northeast Turkey (from Ordu to the border with Georgia), Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, and the Russian part of the Greater Caucasus.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Divergence Between Two Evolutionary Lineages of the Caucasian Salamander: Evidence from GIS Analysis
    HERPETOLOGICAL JOURNAL 18: 155–163, 2008 Ecological divergence between two evolutionary lineages of the Caucasian salamander: evidence from GIS analysis David Tarkhnishvili1, Uður Kaya2, Alexander Gavashelishvili1 & Irina Serbinova3 1Centre of Biodiversity Studies, Ilia Chavchavadze State University, Tbilisi, Georgia 2Department of Zoology, Ege University, Bornova-Izmir, Turkey 3Moscow Zoo, Russia The Caucasian salamander (Mertensiella caucasica sensu lato) is an endemic taxon of the western Lesser Caucasus, classified as Vulnerable in the IUCN Red List. Two isolated evolutionary lineages occur within its range – one in the Black Sea basin, and the other in the basin of the Caspian Sea. We identified and described 51 locations throughout the range of the species, from the easternmost to the westernmost known location and within an elevational range of 50– 2400 m a.s.l. We applied binary logistic regression and a maximum entropy approach to predict the range of the salamander within the polygon delimited by extreme values of 19 bioclimatic parameters for the locations identified. The models were based on the analysis of bioclimatic data, terrain ruggedness and some other environmental variables. The presence or absence of the salamander depends on the level of and variations in rainfall, temperature and terrain ruggedness. Absence of the species from the Greater Caucasus is explained by unsuitable climatic conditions. Separate analysis of the “eastern” and “western” lineages showed no overlap of their predicted ranges, and the model based on the complete data set showed good results only for the “western” evolutionary lineage. This suggests that the genetic isolation of these two lineages is caused by differential climatic requirements rather than by existing fragmentation of suitable habitats.
    [Show full text]