Early Mississippian Ocean Anoxia Triggered Organic Carbon Burial And

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Early Mississippian Ocean Anoxia Triggered Organic Carbon Burial And https://doi.org/10.1130/G46950.1 Manuscript received 20 August 2019 Revised manuscript received 6 December 2019 Manuscript accepted 9 December 2019 © 2020 The Authors. Gold Open Access: This paper is published under the terms of the CC-BY license. Published online 31 January 2020 Early Mississippian ocean anoxia triggered organic carbon burial and late Paleozoic cooling: Evidence from uranium isotopes recorded in marine limestone Keyi Cheng1, Maya Elrick1 and Stephen J. Romaniello2,3 1 Department of Earth & Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, USA 2 Department of Earth & Space Science, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287, USA 3 Department of Earth & Planetary Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA ABSTRACT limestone precipitated from that seawater has the The Early Mississippian (Tournaisian) positive δ13C excursion (mid-Tournaisian carbon potential to record global ocean δ238U. isotope excursion [TICE]) was one of the largest in the Phanerozoic, and the organic carbon We applied the δ238U redox proxy to the one (OC) burial associated with its development is hypothesized to have enhanced late Paleozoic of the largest positive δ13C excursion in the Pha- cooling and glaciation. We tested the hypothesis that expanded ocean anoxia drove widespread nerozoic—the Early Mississippian (Tournaisian) OC burial using uranium isotopes (δ238U) of Lower Mississippian marine limestone as a global δ13C isotope excursion, or mid-Tournaisian car- seawater redox proxy. The δ238U trends record a large Tournaisian negative excursion last- bon isotope excursion (TICE) (Saltzman et al., ing ∼1 m.y. The lack of covariation between δ238U values and facies changes and proxies for 2004). Previous TICE studies interpreted that local depositional and diagenetic influences suggests that theδ 238U trends represent a global OC burial generating the positive excursion was seawater redox signal. The negative δ238U excursion is coincident with the first TICE posi- the result of either OC sequestration in foreland tive excursion, supporting the hypothesis that an expanded ocean anoxic event controlled basin deposits (tectonic-sedimentation driver; OC burial. These results provide the first evidence from a global seawater redox proxy that Saltzman et al., 2000, 2004) or oxygen minimum an ocean anoxic event drove Tournaisian OC burial and controlled Early Mississippian zone expansion (marine anoxia driver; Saltzman, cooling and glaciation. Uranium and carbon modeling results indicate that (1) there was an 2003; Buggisch et al., 2008; Liu et al., 2018; Ma- ∼6× increase in euxinic seafloor area, (2) OC burial was initially driven by expanded euxinia harjan et al., 2018a). To test which process was followed by expanded anoxic/suboxic conditions, and (3) OC burial mass was ∼4–17× larger responsible for TICE OC burial, we used δ238U than that sequestered during other major ocean anoxic events. of Tournaisian limestone in Nevada (USA) to generate a global seawater redox curve. INTRODUCTION Traditional tools used for deciphering the mech- Large, repeated positive carbon isotope anism that best explains enhanced OC burial BACKGROUND (δ13C) excursions are a common feature in Pro- events include lithologic and paleobiologic fea- The Early Mississippian spans the climatic terozoic–Phanerozoic marine carbonate and or- tures, elemental geochemistry, Fe speciation, transition between the Devonian greenhouse and ganic carbon isotope records (e.g., Veizer et al., and sulfur and nitrogen isotopes (e.g., Meyer the late Paleozoic ice age (LPIA) (Montañez 1999). Several of the “Big 5” mass extinctions and Kump, 2008); however, these tools reflect and Poulsen, 2013). The timing of initial LPIA were associated with large positive δ13C excur- local rather than global processes. cooling is debated as occurring by the Middle sions, highlighting the fact that these excur- Uranium isotope variations (δ238U) record- to Late Devonian (e.g., Isaacson et al., 2008), sions record key processes and events in Earth ed in marine carbonates provide a novel way Early Mississippian (Buggisch et al., 2008), or history (e.g., Joachimski and Buggisch, 1993). to distinguish between drivers for marine OC the middle-late Mississippian (e.g., Isbell et al., These positive excursions are attributed to an burial by providing an independent estimate of 2003). North American TICE magnitudes range increase in the burial fraction of organic car- globally integrated ocean redox conditions. The from ∼6‰ to 7‰, and most are characterized bon (OC) produced by oxygenic photosynthe- δ238U value of marine carbonates is a global re- by a double spike (Saltzman, 2002; Maharjan sis, resulting in the withdrawal of atmospheric dox proxy because U isotopes fractionate dur- et al., 2018a). TICE magnitudes from Europe 238 CO2, and pO2 buildup. Increased primary pro- ing reduction with U, which is preferentially and Russia range from 4‰ to 6‰ (Saltzman ductivity, expanded marine anoxia, or increased sequestered into marine sediments deposited et al., 2004). The δ18O trends from Tournaisian sedimentation rates have all been suggested as under anoxic conditions, leaving seawater en- apatite, calcite, and carbonate-associated sul- possible drivers for enhanced OC burial during riched in 235U (Weyer et al., 2008). Because the fate indicate a positive ∼1‰–2‰ shift concur- these events (Kump and Arthur, 1999). However, residence time of U in seawater is significantly rent with the TICE, indicating seawater cooled distinguishing among these potential drivers is longer than ocean mixing times, the U isotope as OC was buried (Mii et al., 1999; Buggisch not straightforward, leading to competing inter- composition of open-ocean seawater is homo- et al., 2008; Maharjan et al., 2018b). Previous pretations involving global or local processes. geneous ( Tissot and Dauphas, 2015); as a result, studies using δ15N (Yao et al., 2015; Maharjan CITATION: Cheng, K., Elrick, M., and Romaniello, S.J., 2020, Early Mississippian ocean anoxia triggered organic carbon burial and late Paleozoic cooling: Evidence from uranium isotopes recorded in marine limestone: Geology, v. 48, p. 363–367, https://doi.org/10.1130/G46950.1 Geological Society of America | GEOLOGY | Volume 48 | Number 4 | www.gsapubs.org 363 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geology/article-pdf/48/4/363/4972107/363.pdf by guest on 28 September 2021 W E concentrations of Th (<0.6 ppm) indicate that 238 A B SL measured δ U trends were not influenced by these local processes. To evaluate potential ef- PR fects of local reducing bottom water or pore America waters, we compared δ238U versus selected North redox-sensitive metals and Mn/Sr (Fig. 3). The lack of covariation and low Mn/Sr values (<0.3) among these redox proxies indicate that 050 km the δ238U trends were not controlled by local reducing conditions. All samples had Mg/Ca Figure 1. (A) Early Mississippian paleogeography of North American, from Blakey (2013). Red values <0.05, indicating that they have not circle shows location of study area in present-day southern Nevada, USA (GPS coordinates been dolomitized. 37°23’39.1"N, 115°15’42.1"W). (B) Schematic east-west cross section across the Mississip- Previous studies of Bahamian carbonates in- pian carbonate ramp, showing location of study area (PR—Pahranagat Range, Nevada, USA; dicated that early diagenesis results in an aver- SL—sea level; modified from Maharjan et al., 2018a). age ∼0.27‰ enrichment of bulk limestone sedi- ments (Tissot and Dauphas, 2015; Romaniello 34 et al., 2018a) and δ SCAS (CAS—carbonate- et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2018). U-isotope com- et al., 2013; Chen et al., 2018). We assume that associated sulfate) (Gill et al., 2007; Maharjan positions are reported as: the Lower Mississippian samples were also af- et al., 2018b) to evaluate Tournaisian seawater fected by similar levels of diagenetic U-isotopic 238 235 redox reported mixed results between adjacent 238 (U/U)sample enrichment, and we argue that the samples were δ U =− 238 235 1 ×1000‰, (1) sections, leaving the question of global redox (U/U)standard enriched uniformly throughout the succession, conditions unanswered. based on the early diagenetic closure of the U We sampled the Lower Mississippian Joana where the standard is CRM-145 (Uranyl Nitrate isotopic system due to the low solubility of U4+ Limestone and Limestone X in the Pahranagat Assay and Isotopic Solution; New Brunswick in anoxic pore waters and limited variation in 18 Range of southeastern Nevada, USA (Fig. 1; GPS Laboratory, 2010). Mn/Sr and δ Ocarb values (Fig. 3; Fig. DR2). coordinates 37°23’39.1"N, 115°15’42.1"W), Given the lithologic, sedimentologic, and geo- where previous conodont biostratigraphy and RESULTS chemical results, we interpret the observed δ238U δ13C studies provide a robust temporal frame- Measured δ238U values ranged from −1.02‰ trends to represent original changes in global work and indicate that the ∼250-m-thick succes- to 0.02‰ (Table DR4 in the Data Repository), seawater redox conditions and recognize a clear sion spans ∼4 m.y. (Saltzman, 2002; Maharjan and stratigraphic trends are shown in Figure 2. negative excursion representing a major Tour- 13 et al., 2018a, 2018b). Detailed paleogeographic, The δ Ccarb (carb—carbonate) values ranged naisian ocean anoxic event (OAE). Using con- stratigraphic, and biostratigraphic background, from −1.1‰ to 7.0‰. Cross-plots of δ238U odont biostratigraphy and numeric age control and our methods, are provided in the GSA Data values against proxies of local redox condi- (Buggisch et al., 2008), the duration of the OAE Repository1. tions (U, V, Mo), detrital influx (Al/U, Th/U, was ∼1 m.y. Uranium is sourced from weathered con- Fe, wt% carbonate), nutrients (Fe, P), and dia- The onset and peak of the Tournaisian 18 tinental crust, and the main sinks are subox- genesis (Mn/Sr, δ Ocarb) show no covariation OAE coincide with the onset and first peak of ic-anoxic-euxinic marine sediments, altered (Fig. 3; Fig. DR2). the TICE (Fig.
Recommended publications
  • Extent and Duration of Marine Anoxia During the Frasnian– Famennian (Late Devonian) Mass Extinction in Poland, Germany, Austria and France
    This is a repository copy of Extent and duration of marine anoxia during the Frasnian– Famennian (Late Devonian) mass extinction in Poland, Germany, Austria and France. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/297/ Article: Bond, D.P.G., Wignall, P.B. and Racki, G. (2004) Extent and duration of marine anoxia during the Frasnian– Famennian (Late Devonian) mass extinction in Poland, Germany, Austria and France. Geological Magazine, 141 (2). pp. 173-193. ISSN 0016-7568 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756804008866 Reuse See Attached Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Geol. Mag. 141 (2), 2004, pp. 173–193. c 2004 Cambridge University Press 173 DOI: 10.1017/S0016756804008866 Printed in the United Kingdom Extent and duration of marine anoxia during the Frasnian– Famennian (Late Devonian) mass extinction in Poland, Germany, Austria and France DAVID BOND*, PAUL B. WIGNALL*† & GRZEGORZ RACKI‡ *School of Earth Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK ‡Department of Palaeontology and Stratigraphy, University of Silesia, ul. Bedzinska 60, PL-41-200 Sosnowiec, Poland (Received 25 March 2003; accepted 10 November 2003) Abstract – The intensity and extent of anoxia during the two Kellwasser anoxic events has been investigated in a range of European localities using a multidisciplinary approach (pyrite framboid assay, gamma-ray spectrometry and sediment fabric analysis).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 Paleozoic Stratigraphy of the Grand Canyon
    CHAPTER 2 PALEOZOIC STRATIGRAPHY OF THE GRAND CANYON PAIGE KERCHER INTRODUCTION The Paleozoic Era of the Phanerozoic Eon is defined as the time between 542 and 251 million years before the present (ICS 2010). The Paleozoic Era began with the evolution of most major animal phyla present today, sparked by the novel adaptation of skeletal hard parts. Organisms continued to diversify throughout the Paleozoic into increasingly adaptive and complex life forms, including the first vertebrates, terrestrial plants and animals, forests and seed plants, reptiles, and flying insects. Vast coal swamps covered much of mid- to low-latitude continental environments in the late Paleozoic as the supercontinent Pangaea began to amalgamate. The hardiest taxa survived the multiple global glaciations and mass extinctions that have come to define major time boundaries of this era. Paleozoic North America existed primarily at mid to low latitudes and experienced multiple major orogenies and continental collisions. For much of the Paleozoic, North America’s southwestern margin ran through Nevada and Arizona – California did not yet exist (Appendix B). The flat-lying Paleozoic rocks of the Grand Canyon, though incomplete, form a record of a continental margin repeatedly inundated and vacated by shallow seas (Appendix A). IMPORTANT STRATIGRAPHIC PRINCIPLES AND CONCEPTS • Principle of Original Horizontality – In most cases, depositional processes produce flat-lying sedimentary layers. Notable exceptions include blanketing ash sheets, and cross-stratification developed on sloped surfaces. • Principle of Superposition – In an undisturbed sequence, older strata lie below younger strata; a package of sedimentary layers youngs upward. • Principle of Lateral Continuity – A layer of sediment extends laterally in all directions until it naturally pinches out or abuts the walls of its confining basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvanian Boundary Unconformity in Marine Carbonate Successions
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Dissertations & Theses in Earth and Atmospheric Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Department of Sciences Summer 6-2014 ORIGIN AND DISTRIBUTION OF THE MISSISSIPPIAN – PENNSYLVANIAN BOUNDARY UNCONFORMITY IN MARINE CARBONATE SUCCESSIONS WITH A CASE STUDY OF THE KARST DEVELOPMENT ATOP THE MADISON FORMATION IN THE BIGHORN BASIN, WYOMING. Lucien Nana Yobo University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/geoscidiss Part of the Geochemistry Commons, Geology Commons, Sedimentology Commons, and the Stratigraphy Commons Nana Yobo, Lucien, "ORIGIN AND DISTRIBUTION OF THE MISSISSIPPIAN – PENNSYLVANIAN BOUNDARY UNCONFORMITY IN MARINE CARBONATE SUCCESSIONS WITH A CASE STUDY OF THE KARST DEVELOPMENT ATOP THE MADISON FORMATION IN THE BIGHORN BASIN, WYOMING." (2014). Dissertations & Theses in Earth and Atmospheric Sciences. 59. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/geoscidiss/59 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations & Theses in Earth and Atmospheric Sciences by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. ORIGIN AND DISTRIBUTION OF THE MISSISSIPPIAN – PENNSYLVANIAN BOUNDARY UNCONFORMITY IN MARINE CARBONATE SUCCESSIONS WITH A CASE STUDY OF THE KARST DEVELOPMENT ATOP THE MADISON FORMATION IN THE BIGHORN BASIN, WYOMING. By Luscalors Lucien Nana Yobo A THESIS Presented to the Faculty of The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For the Degree of Master of Science Major: Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Under the Supervision of Professor Tracy D.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Timeline
    SCIENCE IN THE PARK: GEOLOGY GEOLOGIC TIME SCALE ANALOGY PURPOSE: To show students the order of events and time periods in geologic time and the order of events and ages of the physiographic provinces in Virginia. BACKGROUND: Exact dates for events change as scientists explore geologic time. Dates vary from resource to resource and may not be the same as the dates that appear in your text book. Analogies for geologic time: a 24 hour clock or a yearly calendar. Have students or groups of students come up with their own original analogy. Before you assign this activity, you may want to try it, depending on the age of the student, level of the class, or time constraints, you may want to leave out the events that have a date of less than 1 million years. ! Review conversions in the metric system before you begin this activity ! References L.S. Fichter, 1991 (1997) http://csmres.jmu.edu/geollab/vageol/vahist/images/Vahistry.PDF http://pubs.usgs.gov/gip/geotime/age.html Wicander, Reed. Historical Geology. Fourth Edition. Toronto, Ontario: Brooks/Cole, 2004. Print. VIRGINIA STANDARDS OF LEARNING ES.10 The student will investigate and understand that many aspects of the history and evolution of the Earth can be inferred by studying rocks and fossils. Key concepts include: relative and absolute dating; rocks and fossils from many different geologic periods and epochs are found in Virginia. Developed by C.P. Anderson Page 1 SCIENCE IN THE PARK: GEOLOGY Building a Geologic Time Scale Time: Materials Meter stick, 5 cm adding machine tape, pencil, colored pencils Procedure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Tournaisian and Viséan Lophophyllum of Gorskiy (1932)
    Geologos 23, 3 (2017): 215–221 doi: 10.1515/logos-2017-0022 Tournaisian and Viséan Lophophyllum of Gorskiy (1932) from the Kirghiz Steppe and a possible ancestor of a new Bashkirian rugose coral genus from the Donets Basin (Ukraine) Jerzy Fedorowski Institute of Geology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Bogumiła Krygowskiego 12, 61-680 Poznań, Poland; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract All specimens assigned by Gorskiy (1932) to the genus Lophophyllum Milne Edwards and Haime, 1850 are revised, rede- scribed and reillustrated. The corallite identified by him as a second, specifically indeterminate species ofLophophyllum is here questionably included in Amygdalophyllum Dun and Benson, 1920. For the reminding specimens two new, un- named genera are suggested. ”Lophophyllum” subtortuosum Gorskiy, 1932 belongs to a new, non-dissepimented genus of an unknown family. A possible relationship between gen. nov. 1, sp. nov. 1 and the new Bashkirian genus from the Donets Basin (Ukraine) is proposed. Key words: Kyrgyzstan, “Lophophyllum”, Rugosa, Lower Carboniferous, revision 1. Introduction applied by him cannot be adopted without revision. In addition, his conclusions concerning the relation- The rugose corals redescribed in the present note ships of the Kirghiz Steppe coral fauna cannot be ac- form a small part of the diversified coral fauna cepted without such a revision. The close similarity described by Gorskiy (1932) from the Devonian/ or relationship of the coral fauna from the Kirghiz Carboniferous passage beds and from Tournaisian Steppe to corals from the United States mentioned to lower Viséan strata of the Kirghiz Steppe of the by Gorskiy (1932, p. 58) is particularly doubtful.
    [Show full text]
  • Carboniferous Formations and Faunas of Central Montana
    Carboniferous Formations and Faunas of Central Montana GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 348 Carboniferous Formations and Faunas of Central Montana By W. H. EASTON GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 348 A study of the stratigraphic and ecologic associa­ tions and significance offossils from the Big Snowy group of Mississippian and Pennsylvanian rocks UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1962 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director The U.S. Geological Survey Library has cataloged this publication as follows : Eastern, William Heyden, 1916- Carboniferous formations and faunas of central Montana. Washington, U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1961. iv, 126 p. illus., diagrs., tables. 29 cm. (U.S. Geological Survey. Professional paper 348) Part of illustrative matter folded in pocket. Bibliography: p. 101-108. 1. Paleontology Montana. 2. Paleontology Carboniferous. 3. Geology, Stratigraphic Carboniferous. I. Title. (Series) For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, B.C. CONTENTS Page Page Abstract-__________________________________________ 1 Faunal analysis Continued Introduction _______________________________________ 1 Faunal relations ______________________________ 22 Purposes of the study_ __________________________ 1 Long-ranging elements...__________________ 22 Organization of present work___ __________________ 3 Elements of Mississippian affinity.._________ 22 Acknowledgments--.-------.- ___________________
    [Show full text]
  • The Mississippian Barnett Formation: a Source-Rock, Seal, and Reservoir Produced by Early Carboniferous Flooding of the Texas C
    THE MISSISSIPPIAN BARNETT FORMATION: A SOURCE-ROCK, SEAL, AND RESERVOIR PRODUCED BY EARLY CARBONIFEROUS FLOODING OF THE TEXAS CRATON Stephen C. Ruppel and Jeffery Kane Bureau of Economic Geology Jackson School of Geosciences The University of Texas at Austin Austin,. TX ABSTRACT The Early Carboniferous (Mississippian) was a time of crustal downwarping and flooding of southern Texas region. Mississippian facies documenting this flooding include a basal, updip, shallow to deep water carbonate succession and an overlying, downdip, deep water, fine grained siliciclastic mudrock succession. The basal carbonate succession, termed the Mississippian Limestone in the Permian Basin, includes the Chappel of the Llano Uplift and the Caballero-Lake Valley of southern New Mexico outcrops. These rocks document the margins of an extensive carbonate platform that occupied much of the western U.S. during the middle developed Mississippian. The overlying siliciclastic mudrock succession includes the Barnett formation of the Permian and Ft. Worth Basins and the Rancheria Formation of southern New Mexico outcrops. These rocks accumulated by autochthonous hemipelagic sedimentation and allochthonous mass gravity transport in low energy, below wave base, dysaerobic conditions in a platform marginal deep water basin formed on the southern margin of the Laurussian platform. The carbonate section is poorly known and only of minor importance as a hydrocarbon reservoir in the Permian Basin. Key insights into the detailed character and architecture of these rocks are provided by analogous outcrops of the Lake Valley outcrop succession in New Mexico. The overlying Barnett mudrock succession, long recognized as a hydrocarbon source rock, is similarly poorly known but has recently attracted great attention as a target for gas exploration and development.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Early Visean Coral Assemblage from Azrou-Khenifra Basin, Central Morocco and Palaeobiogeographic Implications Sergio Rodríguez1,2* , Ian D
    Rodríguez et al. Journal of Palaeogeography (2020) 9:5 https://doi.org/10.1186/s42501-019-0051-5 Journal of Palaeogeography ORIGINAL ARTICLE Open Access A new early Visean coral assemblage from Azrou-Khenifra Basin, central Morocco and palaeobiogeographic implications Sergio Rodríguez1,2* , Ian D. Somerville3, Pedro Cózar2, Javier Sanz-López4, Ismael Coronado5, Felipe González6, Ismail Said1 and Mohamed El Houicha7 Abstract A new early Visean coral assemblage has been recorded from turbidite facies in the southern part of the Azrou- Khenifra Basin, northwest of Khenifra, central Morocco. The newly discovered Ba Moussa West (BMW) coral fauna includes Siphonophyllia khenifrense sp. nov., Sychnoelasma urbanowitschi, Cravenia lamellata, Cravenia tela, Cravenia rhytoides, Turnacipora megastoma and Pleurosiphonella crustosa. The early Visean age of the coral assemblage is supported by foraminiferal and conodont data, with the recognition of the basal Visean MFZ9 Zone. This confirms that the first transgression in the Azrou-Khenifra Basin was during the earliest Visean. The allochthonous coral assemblage was recovered from coarse-grained proximal limestone debris flow and turbidite beds within a fault- bounded unit, lying to the west of a thrust syncline containing upper Visean limestones. No evidence exists of the former early Visean shallow-water platform from which the corals were derived. All other in situ platform carbonate rocks around the southern margin of the Azrou-Khenifra Basin are probably of late Visean (Asbian–Brigantian) age. The early Visean Ba Moussa West coral fauna can be compared with that at Tafilalt in eastern Morocco, as well as in other Saharian basins of Algeria. Many of the genera and species in the Ba Moussa West assemblage are identical to those in NW Europe, with which it must have had marine connections.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating the Frasnian-Famennian Mass Extinction: Comparing Brachiopod Faunas
    Evaluating the Frasnian-Famennian mass extinction: Comparing brachiopod faunas PAUL COPPER Copper, P. 1998. Evaluating the Frasnian-Famennian mass extinction: Comparing bra- chiopod faunas.- Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 43,2,137-154. The Frasnian-Famennian (F-F) mass extinctions saw the global loss of all genera belonging to the tropically confined order Atrypida (and Pentamerida): though Famen- nian forms have been reported in the literafure, none can be confirmed. Losses were more severe during the Givetian (including the extinction of the suborder Davidsoniidina, and the reduction of the suborder Lissatrypidina to a single genus),but ońgination rates in the remaining suborder surviving into the Frasnian kept the group alive, though much reduced in biodiversity from the late Earb and Middle Devonian. In the terminal phases of the late Palmatolepis rhenana and P linguifurmis zones at the end of the Frasnian, during which the last few Atrypidae dechned, no new genera originated, and thus the Atrypida were extĘated. There is no evidence for an abrupt termination of all lineages at the F-F boundary, nor that the Atrypida were abundant at this time, since all groups were in decline and impoverished. Atypida were well established in dysaerobic, muddy substrate, reef lagoonal and off-reef deeper water settings in the late Givetian and Frasnian, alongside a range of brachiopod orders which sailed through the F-F boundary: tropical shelf anoxia or hypońa seems implausible as a cause for aĘpid extinction. Glacial-interglacial climate cycles recorded in South Ameńca for the Late Devonian, and their synchronous global cooling effect in low latitudes, as well as loss of the reef habitat and shelf area reduction, remain as the most likely combined scenarios for the mass extinction events.
    [Show full text]
  • (Late Devonian) Boundary Within the Foreknobs Formation, Maryland and West Virginia
    The Frasnian-Famennian (Late Devonian) boundary within the Foreknobs Formation, Maryland and West Virginia GEORGE R. McGHEE, JR. Department of Geological Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627 ABSTRACT The approximate position of the Frasnian-Famennian (Late De- vonian) boundary is determined within the Foreknobs Formation along the Allegheny Front in Maryland and West Virginia by utiliz- ing the time ranges of the articulate brachiopods Athryis angelica Hall, Cyrtospirifer sulcifer (Hall), and members of the Atrypidae. INTRODUCTION The age of strata previously called the "Chemung Formation" along the Allegheny Front in Maryland and West Virginia (Fig. 1) has been of interest to Devonian wokers for some time. Recent at- tempts to resolve this problem include the works of Dennison (1970, 1971) and Curry (1975). New paleontological contribu- tions to the resolution of time relations within the Greenland Gap Group ("Chemung Formation") are the object of this paper, which is an outgrowth of a much larger ecological analysis of Late Devo- nian benthic marine fauna as preserved in the central Appalachians (McGhee, 1975, 1976). STRATIGRAPHIC SETTING The following is a condensation and summary of the evolution of Upper Devonian stratigraphic nomenclatural usage in the study Figure 1. Location map of study area, showing positions of the mea- area; for a more complete and thorough discussion, the reader is sured sections used in this study (after Dennison, 1970). referred to Dennison (1970) and Kirchgessner (1973). The Chemung Formation was originally designated by James lower Cohocton Stage." Elsewhere, concerning the upper limit of Hall (1839) from Chemung Narrows in south-central New York.
    [Show full text]
  • Precisely Dating the Frasnian–Famennian Boundary
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Precisely dating the Frasnian– Famennian boundary: implications for the cause of the Late Devonian Received: 12 April 2018 Accepted: 12 June 2018 mass extinction Published: xx xx xxxx L. M. E. Percival1, J. H. F. L. Davies2, U. Schaltegger 2, D. De Vleeschouwer3, A.-C. Da Silva4,5 & K. B. Föllmi1 The Frasnian–Famennian boundary records one of the most catastrophic mass extinctions of the Phanerozoic Eon. Several possible causes for this extinction have been suggested, including extra- terrestrial impacts and large-scale volcanism. However, linking the extinction with these potential causes is hindered by the lack of precise dating of either the extinction or volcanic/impact events. In this study, a bentonite layer in uppermost-Frasnian sediments from Steinbruch Schmidt (Germany) is re-analysed using CA-ID-TIMS U-Pb zircon geochronology in order to constrain the date of the Frasnian–Famennian extinction. A new age of 372.36 ± 0.053 Ma is determined for this bentonite, confrming a date no older than 372.4 Ma for the Frasnian–Famennian boundary, which can be further constrained to 371.93–371.78 Ma using a pre-existing Late Devonian age model. This age is consistent with previous dates, but is signifcantly more precise. When compared with published ages of the Siljan impact crater and basalts produced by large-scale volcanism, there is no apparent correlation between the extinction and either phenomenon, not clearly supporting them as a direct cause for the Frasnian– Famennian event. This result highlights an urgent need for further Late Devonian geochronological and chemostratigraphic work to better understand the cause(s) of this extinction.
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLOGIC TIME SCALE V
    GSA GEOLOGIC TIME SCALE v. 4.0 CENOZOIC MESOZOIC PALEOZOIC PRECAMBRIAN MAGNETIC MAGNETIC BDY. AGE POLARITY PICKS AGE POLARITY PICKS AGE PICKS AGE . N PERIOD EPOCH AGE PERIOD EPOCH AGE PERIOD EPOCH AGE EON ERA PERIOD AGES (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) HIST HIST. ANOM. (Ma) ANOM. CHRON. CHRO HOLOCENE 1 C1 QUATER- 0.01 30 C30 66.0 541 CALABRIAN NARY PLEISTOCENE* 1.8 31 C31 MAASTRICHTIAN 252 2 C2 GELASIAN 70 CHANGHSINGIAN EDIACARAN 2.6 Lopin- 254 32 C32 72.1 635 2A C2A PIACENZIAN WUCHIAPINGIAN PLIOCENE 3.6 gian 33 260 260 3 ZANCLEAN CAPITANIAN NEOPRO- 5 C3 CAMPANIAN Guada- 265 750 CRYOGENIAN 5.3 80 C33 WORDIAN TEROZOIC 3A MESSINIAN LATE lupian 269 C3A 83.6 ROADIAN 272 850 7.2 SANTONIAN 4 KUNGURIAN C4 86.3 279 TONIAN CONIACIAN 280 4A Cisura- C4A TORTONIAN 90 89.8 1000 1000 PERMIAN ARTINSKIAN 10 5 TURONIAN lian C5 93.9 290 SAKMARIAN STENIAN 11.6 CENOMANIAN 296 SERRAVALLIAN 34 C34 ASSELIAN 299 5A 100 100 300 GZHELIAN 1200 C5A 13.8 LATE 304 KASIMOVIAN 307 1250 MESOPRO- 15 LANGHIAN ECTASIAN 5B C5B ALBIAN MIDDLE MOSCOVIAN 16.0 TEROZOIC 5C C5C 110 VANIAN 315 PENNSYL- 1400 EARLY 5D C5D MIOCENE 113 320 BASHKIRIAN 323 5E C5E NEOGENE BURDIGALIAN SERPUKHOVIAN 1500 CALYMMIAN 6 C6 APTIAN LATE 20 120 331 6A C6A 20.4 EARLY 1600 M0r 126 6B C6B AQUITANIAN M1 340 MIDDLE VISEAN MISSIS- M3 BARREMIAN SIPPIAN STATHERIAN C6C 23.0 6C 130 M5 CRETACEOUS 131 347 1750 HAUTERIVIAN 7 C7 CARBONIFEROUS EARLY TOURNAISIAN 1800 M10 134 25 7A C7A 359 8 C8 CHATTIAN VALANGINIAN M12 360 140 M14 139 FAMENNIAN OROSIRIAN 9 C9 M16 28.1 M18 BERRIASIAN 2000 PROTEROZOIC 10 C10 LATE
    [Show full text]