AUSTRALIA's SECURITY, 1939-1942S LONDON OR WASHINGTON?
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Australia's security, 1939-1942: London or Washington? Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Burns, Barbara Ruth, 1935- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 04/10/2021 22:32:59 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/317958 AUSTRALIA'S SECURITY, 1939-1942s LONDON OR WASHINGTON? fey Barbara Rath Barns A Thesis Sabmitted to the Faealty of the BEPARTMEiT OF HISTORY In partial Falfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 19 6 6 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at the University of Arizona and is deposited in the University library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library, Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided, that accurate acknowledgement of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Bean of the Graduate College when in his judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author. SIGNEDi .A-4/ APPROVAL BY THESIS DIRECTOR This thesis has been approved on the date shown below? />Q2®4(gOj£j1<o ^ F, LAMMERS \yrnA Bate Professor of History FSEFACE & e purpose of this study is to show the effect that the growth of sJapamese power durimg the period 1939-1S*^ had oa the security of Austra lia 0 Australiaa governmental officials were faced with many agonizing and perplexing problems, which caused considerable tension between the Dominion Government and the Waited Kingdom= Finally8 as a result of de velopments which will be considered in detail, Australia took the unpre- cented step of frankly seeking to base her security on American rather than British foundations„ Wnfertunately, certain official documents, pertaining to the sub ject of this thesis, of which the Grown Copyright is legally vested in the Controller of lis Majesty8s Stationery Office, are unavailable to the pub lic at the present time, These restrictions deprive my study of any claim to be definitive0 However, it has been ay intention to present the picture as accurately as possible through the use of all available material. My trip to Australia, and subsequent visits to the Australian National Wmiversity in Canberra and the University of Melbourne, proved invaluable as they afforded me the opportunity to use their extensive libraries. Consequently, much of the research for this thesis was carried out at these two universities, I also received immeasurable help in under standing the views of the Australians at the time of World War II from dis-■ tinguished professors serving at the two universities mentioned above, Without this assistance, this work would have been an impossible task. „TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EREFACE . iii LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS.............. v ABSTRACT .................. .............. vi I. MENACE OF JAPAN ....... ....... ........ 1 II. AUSTRALIA9 BRITAIN, AND PACIFIC SECURITT.......... .. 20 III. AMERICA, BRITAIN, AND PACIFIC SECURITY ......... 52 IV. PACIFIC SECURITY? WHOSE RESPONSIBILITY? ........ ?1 V. AUSTRALIA, AMERICA, AND PACIFIC SECURITY........ 106 VI. CONCLUSION. ............. 130 LIST OF REFERENCES. .............. 134 iv IjIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure Rage la ..The Japanese Empire and Its Partition ........... 1.9 2. British Commitments in the Far East ............ 5.1 v ABSTRACT In Septembers 1939o Australia as a ©©minion of the British Cem- monwealthg was prepared to follow the traditional role of accepting guidance9 leadership and military assistance from the United Kingdomo • However„ the divergence, of interests between Britain and Australia caused tensions to increase. Typical of these were: Britain®s insis tence that the European theater take precedence over the Pacific a Churchill®s unwillingness to grant Australia a major role in policy making for the Pacific9 the deaf ear given to Australia8s plea to fur ther strengthen Singapore, and the use of Australian troops in the Middle East while the situation nearer home was rapidly deteriorating, Added to these was the knowledge of the waning power of Great Britain and her inability to defend her possessions in the Pacific„ Therefore8 when a Japanese invasion of her homeland seemed possibles Australia turned for aid to America, Though this plea may have been unorthodoxp . it was realistic, Australia®s security was jeopardized; she could not defend herself unaided. Nevertheless9 it took many agonizing days before America responded in what Australia considered a suitable manner. The ultimate decision to call on Washingtons rather than Londons and the events that led up to this decision, comprise the major portion of this work. CHAPTER I THE HENACE OF JAPAN In September 1939 King George VI, on the advice of the United Kihgdem government, declared war against Germany on behalf of the United Kingdom, India, Burma, and the Colonial Empire, Also the king declared war against Germany on behalf of the self-governing dominions of Australia9 Canada, South Africa and lew Zealand on separate advise ments of these governments, The Prime Minister of Australia, Mr* Menzies, declared that Australia was at war with Germany by virtue of the king's statement» There was no hesitation, Australia would cooperate with the Imperial Government to the fullest extent „ However, there was a lack of preparation on the part of all Commonwealth governments. Few realized the problems ahead. Be one anticipated the sacrifices that would be required. At the outset of the war, Australia felt reasonably secure as a part of the British Empire. She looked to the Prime Minister of Britain for guidance, assistance and leadership. This had been her traditional role and it was the path she was prepared to follow. How* ever, as the war progressed, the ability of the British to guarantee security in every part of the globe declined, while differences of in terest developed which required impartial and independent consideration. The truth is that while the Pacific was am area in which the interests ' \ 1 of Britain as a whole were only secondarys though still deemed important, to Australians it was a sphere of vital interest, of direct, immediate peril, and. of special responsibility,. While the world, watched with horror the aggressive actions of Germany in Europe, Australians watched their neighbor to the north „ As an island continent of white people in the midst of a sea of Orientals, Australians had reason to be apprehensive. They had been hearing about the Yellow Peril (denoting all Orientals) all their lives„ But this ex= pression, since the 192©8s, pertained only to Japan and carried with it the picture of a small, overpopulated island that lacked the necessary natural resources and thus was greedy for the land, and the resources within it, that Australians cherished0 Australia's fear of Japan did net date from Pearl Harbor, bat from the day Japan began her aggressive actions in the 192©8s . The face that Japan was expanding, seemingly un<= hindered by the great Western powers, indicated that Australia might be her victim in the near future „ Aware that the rest of the world was preoccupied by the European situation, Australian governmental officials implored those powers stronger than she to stop this threat before it grew toe large to handle„ She offered a variety of alternatives, none of which she could back up alone. For the most part, Australian sugges tions went unheeded„ Bae to her lack of military resources, Australia's hands were tied as she watched Japan's empire grow larger« The story of Japan's growth must be told because it has a direct bearing on Australia's relations with her Mother Country« It is only natural that since Australia would be endangered by any southward drive 3 on the part of Japang she should be one of the first to send up warnings to the rest of the world concerning this menace. She also felt that it was only natural that Great Britain should see this danger and conse quently send aid to her Dominion government. Within this realm of reason- lag lies the bulk of the controversy that was later to develop between Prime Minister Churchill and Prime Minister Curtin. As the situation grew more distressing for each prime minister, their apparent inability to reassure the other successfully caused friction that was unlike any between Great Britain and Australia before, The menace of Japan was the decisive factor causing strained rela tions between Australia and her Mother Country, True, there had been dif ferences of opinion in the past. But these were of minor importance in comparison to the close bond that Australia felt for Great Britain. Therefore there is a direct correlation between the increasing threat of Japan and the tone of the messages exchanged between the two prime min isters. Each country was under tremendous pressure and limited in its responses to conditions throughout the world. Neither interpreted the same picture with the same degree of importance. There was obviously a divergence of interests and as this became more apparent, relations grew more tense. Japan0s entry into the conflict had changed the whole emphasis of the Second World War for Australians. Previously they had fought their wars on the territories of other people; new a war threatened their own soil. Previously it had been London or Coventry that was bombed; now it was Darwin and Broome, The bulk of the nation0s fighting men, whether 4 seas land ©r air forces, was serving in war theaters thousands of miles from the Pacific area.