DOCSLIB.ORG

The Biomechanics of Sauropod Necks

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ORYCTOS,Vol. 1 : 113-120,Octobre 1998 NOT CRANESOR MASTS, BUT BEAMS : THE BIOMECHANICS OF SAUROPODNECKS John MARTIN', Valérie MARTIN-ROLLAND2 and Eberhard (Dino) FREY3 lleicesterCity Museum, New Walk, Leicester LEI 7EA, and Department of Geology, Leicester University, Leicester LEI 7RH;U. K. 2Muséedes Dinosaures, 11260 Espéraza, France. 3Museumfiir NattirkundeKarlsruhe, Posdach 6209,D-76042, Germany. Abstract : The mechanicsof sauropodnecks are still poorly understood,judging from many recentlife reconstructions. Only sevenor eight sauropodtaxa have necks well-enough known for their mobility and posture to be reconstructedfully and reliably. In theseanimals, the limits of mobility imposed by the zygapophysealand central articulation structuresmay be calculated. Simple biomechanicsshows that sauropodnecks were segmentedbeams, and that the way in which seg- mented beamsmust be braced adds further limits to mobility. The bracing systemsimplied by the vertebral anatomy can be reconstructed,based partly on an appreciation,from extantanimals, of what soft-tissuestructures were possiblegiven a particularset of bone geometries.Sauropod necks were dorsally-braced,ventrally-braced or a combinationof the two: eachsystem was associatedwith a distinctive,exclusive, group ofvertebral features- high, low or divided neural spines, largeor small transverseprocesses and shortor elongatedcervical ribs. The two setsof mobility-controlling systems(oint morphology and bracing) madethe necks of all "popular" sauropodsrelatively, or very rigid structures,and also show that they were habitually carriedwith the ventral aspect"down" with respectto gravity - in other words as beams,not masts. Key words : Dinosaur,sauropod, biomechnnics, necks, Iift reconstructions. Ni gruesni mâts, mais timons - Biomécaniquedes cousde sauropodes Résumé : D'aprèsde nombreusesreconstitutions récentes, la mécaniquedu cou des sauropodesdemeure méconnue. Au seindes sauropodes, seuls sept ou huit ont le cou suffisammentconnu pour permettreune reconstitutioncomplète et fiable de sa position et de sa mobilité. Chez ces animaux,les limites de la mobilité (imposéespar les zygapophyseset I'articu- lation du centrum)peuvent être calculées.Des principessimples de biomécaniquemontrent que le cou peut être assimilé à une poutresegmentée. La manièredont ces segmentsdoivent être soutenusajoute des limites supplémentairesaux pos- sibilitésde mobilité. Le systèmede soutienimposé par l'anatomievertébrale peut êtrereconstitué, partiellement fondé sur une appréciation(à partir d'animaux actuels)des dispositions particulières des structuresosseuses qui permettentde défi- nir le type de partiesmolles correspondantes.Le cou dessauropodes était soutenudorsalement, ventralement ou par une combinaisondes deux, chaquesystème étant associéà un groupeunique et distinct de caractèresvertébraux (épine neu- rale haute,basse ou divisée,grands ou petitsprocessus transverses, et côtescervicales courtes ou allongées).Les deux sys- tèmespossibles du contrôlede la mobilité (morphologiearticulaire et type de soutien)font du cou de tous les sauropodes < populaires >>une structure assezou très rigide et montre égalementque le cou était habituellement porté horizontale- ment, en d'autrestermes comme un timon et non colnmeun mât. Mots clés : Dinosaure,sauropode, biomécanique, cou, reconstitutions. INTRODUCTION as a result of their complexintervertebral articulation systems.The limits imposedby the zygapophysealand Popularlife reconstructionsregularly show sauro- centrapophysealmorphology of sauropodnecks may be podswith the neckheld almostvertically, or in an artis- calculatedquite accuratelyin the few taxathat arewell- tically flexed 's' curve, suggestingthat the animals enoughknown (Martin, 1981 ; Stevens& Parrish,1996). could browsehigh in the treesor fight by "necking" This paperapplies the principlesof biomechanics (e.g.Bakker, 1986; Paul , 1987). On the otherhand, to sauropods'necks to help resolvethe dilemma.An somestudies (e.g. Coombs, I9l5 ; Martin,I98l ; Dod- important limitation of the project is that there are son, 1990)have arguedthat there were rather severe very few reliable specimenson which to base our mechanicallimits to the flexibility of sauropods'necks conclusions. 113 ORYCTOS.Vol. 1. 1998 LIMITS OF KNOWLEDGE be made. In most cases,too (exceptionsbeing Pla- .SAUROPOD NECKS teosaurus and, perhaps, Shunosaurusin which several or many individuals belonging to one species are Only one or two prosauropod and perhaps eight known) there is only one individual animal known. sauropodtaxa arewell-enough known for anear-com- Does this animal representthe constructional situation plete, accurate reconstruction of the neck skeleton to in a species,genus or higher taxon? TAXON AGE NECK known... SITUATION PROSAUROPODA Thecodontosaurus. .. .Norian-Camian. .incompletely. .? Anchisaurus ... ...Pliensbachianor Toarcian... ..incompletely ? ........ .? Massospondylus.............Hettangian-Pliensbachian ......nearly completely. ......?10 low, undivided neural spines; "long ribs" Yunannosauru,r. .Hettangian-Pliensbachian. .incompletely. .? Mussaurus .Norian ........?compleûely .... ... .. ...? Ammosaurus . ......Pliensbachianor Toarcian.. ...incompletely .... ... ..? Plateosaurus ........Norian ........many,completely........l0 low, undivided neural spines; ribs 2-3 segments Sellosaurus .Norian ........incompletely.............? Euskelosaurus ......CarnianorNorian .....incompletely..........? Lufengosaurus . .Hettangian-Pliensbachian. .incompletely.. .? Melanorosauru,r.............Carnian or Norian .....incompletely...........? Riojasaurus .........Norian ........completely? .... .........? SAI.JROPODA Vulcanodon .........?Hettangian ..?...... ...........? Barapasaurus .......?"early Jurassic" ......?. ................? Cetiosaurus .........Bajocian-Bathonian ...nearlycompletely .......14 medium,undivided neural spines; ribs 1-2 segments Haplocanthosaurus..........Kimmeridgian-Tithonian.......nearly completely .......14 medium,undivided neural spines; ribs 1-2 segments Patagosaurus .......Callovian .....?partially................? Shunosaurusv .......Bathonian-Callovian ..?completely ....?15medium, undivided neural spines; ribs ? Omeisaurus .........Bathonian-Callovian ..?partially ........? Mamenchisaurus.............late Jurassic ..incompletely ....8low, undivided + ?14medium, undivided neuralspines; ribs 2-3 segments Phuwiangosaurus............?. .....?.. ...............? Euhelopus ..?Kimmeridgian .... ...Nearlycompletely .......?l21ow-medium, undivided + 3 medium-high dividedneural spines; ribs 2-3 segments Diplodocus .Kimmeridgian-Tithonian... ....? completely... .........7 medium,undivided + 8 medium,divided neuralspines; ribs l-2 segments Barosaurus .Kimmeridgian-Tithonian.......nearlycompletely .......?15 medium, undivided + ?2medium, divided neuralspines; ribs 1-2 segments Apatosaurus ........Kimmeridgian-Tithonian.......nearlycompletely .......7 low,wide but undivided + 8 low,widely dividedneural spines; ribs <l segment Dicraeosaurus ......Kimmeridgian... ......?nearlycompletely ......74 high, undivided + ?7high, divided neural spines;ribs 1 segment Brachiosaurus . .. ...Kimmeridgian-Tithonian.......?nearly completely . ...?13low, undivided neural spines; ribs 1-2segments TABLE l. Completenessof well-knownsauropodomorph dinosaurs'necks rt4 MARTIN , MARTIN-ROLLAND& FREY - SAUROPODNECKS BIOMECHANICS . SAUROPODNECKS \ryEREBRACED BEAMS A simple beam supported at just one end, like a FIGURE I - A simple,unbraced beam supported at cranejib, has its upper part stressedby tension while one end. The effect of gravity on the unsupported its lower part is under compression (fig. 1). Most structureis to placethe upper part under tension the lower part. engineering beams are braced, either by their cross- while compressing sectional design, by internal struts or by external braces, to distribute and reduce these stresses.The Forth Bridge, near Edinburgh, Scotland, shows how this works. It is a cantilever bridge; each half-section is a beam braced above and below and supported at one end by a leg. Civil engineering does not make segmented,mobile-jointed beams (except for those wooden toy snakes), but long-necked animals (like sauropods)have them. A segmented,flexible beam cannot be unbraced. Becauseeach segmentneeds to be free to move againstits neighbours,the tensile and compressivestresses must be redistributed away from the intersegmental articulations by bracing systems running the whole length of the structure. knees so that we can stand for long periods without Just like the Forth Bridge, a horizontal beam has tiring. to be braced above and below; in living structuresthis Sauropod neck ligament systemshave been des- means dorsal and ventral bracing systems. If the cribed before, particularly in discussionsof the func- beam is tilted, the detailed geometry (including the tion of divided neural spines (e.g. Alexander, 1985, orientation of the bracing members) changes,but the and references therein), as "cables" supporting a principle remains the same. For stability in all orien- "crafiejib". Recognition of a ventral system, and of tations, the beam has a minimum of three bracing its function in combination with the dorsal structures members at least one dorsal and two ventral. The as bracing for the neck, is new in this paper. In sau- dorsal braces are tension members while the ventral ropods the long, forward and backward directed pro- set work in compression (again, like the Forth Bridge) cessesof the cervical
Recommended publications
  • Valérie Martin, Varavudh Suteethorn & Eric Buffetaut, Description of the Type and Referred Material of Phuwiangosaurus

    Valérie Martin, Varavudh Suteethorn & Eric Buffetaut, Description of the Type and Referred Material of Phuwiangosaurus

    ORYCTOS, V ol . 2 : 39 - 91, Décembre 1999 DESCRIPTION OF THE TYPE AND REFERRED MATERIAL OF PHUWIANGOSAURUS SIRINDHORNAE MARTIN, BUFFETAUT AND SUTEETHORN, 1994, A SAUROPOD FROM THE LOWER CRETACEOUS OF THAILAND Valérie MARTIN 1, Varavudh SUTEETHORN 2 and Eric BUFFETAUT 3 1 Musée des Dinosaures, 11260 Espéraza, France 2 Geological Survey Division, Department of Mineral Resources, Rama VI Road, 10400 Bangkok, Thailand 3 CNRS (UMR 5561), 16 cour du Liégat, 75013 Paris, France Abstract : The type specimen of P. sirindhornae Martin, Buffetaut and Suteethorn, 1994 is an incomplete, partly articulated, skeleton discovered in the Phu Wiang area of northeastern Thailand). Most of the abundant sauropod material from the Sao Khua Formation (Early Cretaceous), collected on the Khorat Plateau, in northeastern Thailand, is referable to this species. Phuwiangosaurus is a middle-sized sauropod, which is clearly different from the Jurassic Chinese sauropods (Euhelopodidae). On the basis of a few jaw elements and teeth, P. sirindhornae may be considered as an early representative of the family Nemegtosauridae. Key words : Sauropoda, Osteology, Early Cretaceous, Thailand Description du type et du matériel rapporté de Phuwiangosaurus sirindhornae Martin, Buffetaut et Suteethorn, 1994, un sauropode du Crétacé inférieur de Thaïlande Résumé : Le spécimen type de Phuwiangosaurus sirindhornae est un squelette incomplet, partiellement articulé, découvert dans la région de Phu Wiang (Nord-Est de la Thaïlande). Phuwiangosaurus est un sauropode de taille moyenne (15 à 20 m de longueur) très différent des sauropodes du Jurassique chinois. La majeure partie de l’abondant matériel de sauropodes, récolté sur le Plateau de Khorat (Formation Sao Khua, Crétacé inférieur), est rap - portée à cette espèce.
  • 71St Annual Meeting Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Paris Las Vegas Las Vegas, Nevada, USA November 2 – 5, 2011 SESSION CONCURRENT SESSION CONCURRENT

    71St Annual Meeting Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Paris Las Vegas Las Vegas, Nevada, USA November 2 – 5, 2011 SESSION CONCURRENT SESSION CONCURRENT

    ISSN 1937-2809 online Journal of Supplement to the November 2011 Vertebrate Paleontology Vertebrate Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Society of Vertebrate 71st Annual Meeting Paleontology Society of Vertebrate Las Vegas Paris Nevada, USA Las Vegas, November 2 – 5, 2011 Program and Abstracts Society of Vertebrate Paleontology 71st Annual Meeting Program and Abstracts COMMITTEE MEETING ROOM POSTER SESSION/ CONCURRENT CONCURRENT SESSION EXHIBITS SESSION COMMITTEE MEETING ROOMS AUCTION EVENT REGISTRATION, CONCURRENT MERCHANDISE SESSION LOUNGE, EDUCATION & OUTREACH SPEAKER READY COMMITTEE MEETING POSTER SESSION ROOM ROOM SOCIETY OF VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS SEVENTY-FIRST ANNUAL MEETING PARIS LAS VEGAS HOTEL LAS VEGAS, NV, USA NOVEMBER 2–5, 2011 HOST COMMITTEE Stephen Rowland, Co-Chair; Aubrey Bonde, Co-Chair; Joshua Bonde; David Elliott; Lee Hall; Jerry Harris; Andrew Milner; Eric Roberts EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Philip Currie, President; Blaire Van Valkenburgh, Past President; Catherine Forster, Vice President; Christopher Bell, Secretary; Ted Vlamis, Treasurer; Julia Clarke, Member at Large; Kristina Curry Rogers, Member at Large; Lars Werdelin, Member at Large SYMPOSIUM CONVENORS Roger B.J. Benson, Richard J. Butler, Nadia B. Fröbisch, Hans C.E. Larsson, Mark A. Loewen, Philip D. Mannion, Jim I. Mead, Eric M. Roberts, Scott D. Sampson, Eric D. Scott, Kathleen Springer PROGRAM COMMITTEE Jonathan Bloch, Co-Chair; Anjali Goswami, Co-Chair; Jason Anderson; Paul Barrett; Brian Beatty; Kerin Claeson; Kristina Curry Rogers; Ted Daeschler; David Evans; David Fox; Nadia B. Fröbisch; Christian Kammerer; Johannes Müller; Emily Rayfield; William Sanders; Bruce Shockey; Mary Silcox; Michelle Stocker; Rebecca Terry November 2011—PROGRAM AND ABSTRACTS 1 Members and Friends of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, The Host Committee cordially welcomes you to the 71st Annual Meeting of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology in Las Vegas.
  • (Dinosauria: Sauropoda) Specimens from the Upper Cretaceous Daijiaping Formation of Southern China

    (Dinosauria: Sauropoda) Specimens from the Upper Cretaceous Daijiaping Formation of Southern China

    New titanosauriform (Dinosauria: Sauropoda) specimens from the Upper Cretaceous Daijiaping Formation of southern China Fenglu Han1, Xing Xu2,3, Corwin Sullivan4,5, Leqing Huang6, Yu Guo7 and Rui Wu1 1 School of Earth Sciences, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan, China 2 Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China 3 CAS Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Beijing, China 4 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada 5 Philip J. Currie Dinosaur Museum, Wembley, Canada 6 Hunan Institute of Geological Survey, Changsha, China 7 The Geological Museum of China, Beijing, China ABSTRACT Titanosauriform sauropod dinosaurs were once considered rare in the Upper Creta- ceous of Asia, but a number of titanosauriforms from this stratigraphic interval have been discovered in China in recent years. In fact, all adequately known Cretaceous Asian sauropods are titanosauriforms, but only a few have been well studied, lending significance to any new anatomical information that can be extracted from Asia's Cretaceous sauropod record. Here we give a detailed description of some titanosauri- form bones recovered recently from the Upper Cretaceous Daijiaping Formation of Tianyuan County, Zhuzhou City, Hunan Province, southern China. The occurrence of this material in Hunan increases the known geographic range of titanosauriforms in eastern Asia. Although all of the specimens discussed in this paper can be assigned to Titanosauriformes at least tentatively, some bones display a limited number of features Submitted 20 August 2019 that are more typical of basal sauropods and/or derived diplodocoids, suggesting Accepted 19 November 2019 Published 20 December 2019 complex patterns of character evolution within Neosauropoda.
  • Evolution of the Caudal Vertebral Series in Macronarian Sauropod Dinosaurs: Morphofunctional and Phylogenetic Implications

    Evolution of the Caudal Vertebral Series in Macronarian Sauropod Dinosaurs: Morphofunctional and Phylogenetic Implications

    Evolution of the Caudal Vertebral Series in Macronarian Sauropod Dinosaurs: Morphofunctional and Phylogenetic Implications A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Drexel University By Lucio Manuel Ibiricu In partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy October 2010 © Copyright 2010 Lucio Manuel Ibiricu. All Rights Reserved ii DEDICATION To the people who trusted me and my grandfather (Manolo) iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First of all, I want to thank my advisor, Dr. Lacovara, for several things: for admitting me in the program, for supporting me constantly, especially at the beginning of my experience in the United States and for exposing me to ―big‖ people in Paleontology. Ken gave me the opportunity to work and learn; I will always be grateful to him. I also thank Dr. Spotila, the head of my committee, for always supporting me and for helping in the organization, always very important during the PhD. I really appreciate it. In addition, I want to thank Dr. Dodson for accepting to be part of my committee. His presence is a privilege to me and it is an honor to say that he was part of my PhD committee. I would like to express my gratitude to Dr. Gallagher. He taught me the majority of my first courses at Drexel and I always learned a lot from him. Also, my first TA was under his supervision; therefore, I want to thank him for all the support he gave me both as student and as a TA. Likewise, I would like to thank Dr. Kilham, because her presence in my committee pushed me to learn more about ecology, which helped me integrate dinosaurs and their environment.
  • Overview of Sauropod Phylogeny and Evolution

    Overview of Sauropod Phylogeny and Evolution

    One Overview of Sauropod Phylogeny and Evolution Jeffrey A. Wilson SAUROPOD STUDIES FROM OWEN TO long bones” and “the toes being terminated by THE PRESENT strong claws” (Owen 1842:102), but this assess- ment was based on limited anatomical evidence This year marks the one hundred sixty-fourth (Owen 1875:27). Key data emerged with the dis- anniversary of Richard Owen’s (1841) description covery of abundant Cetiosaurus bones in of the first sauropod—Cetiosaurus, the “whale Oxfordshire by John Phillips. Thomas Huxley lizard”—on the basis of vertebrae and limb ele- examined this “splendid series of remains” ments from localities across England. Although before the publication of Phillips’ (1871) mono- these remains “had been examined by Cuvier graph and was the first to place Cetiosaurus within and pronounced to be cetaceous” (Buckland Dinosauria (Iguanodontidae [Huxley, 1869:35]). 1841:96), Owen (1841:458–459) demonstrated Phillips (1871) interpreted Cetiosaurus as a plant- the saurian affinities of Cetiosaurus on the basis eating dinosaur and hypothesized that its limb of several features, including the absence of epi- bones were “suited for walking.” He could not physes (growth plates) on caudal vertebrae (fig. rule out the possibility that it was amphibious, 1.1). He differentiated Cetiosaurus from other however, concluding that it was a “marsh-loving extinct saurians on the basis of its large size and or riverside animal.” Owen (1875:27) later acqui- characteristics of its vertebrae (see Upchurch esced, referring Cetiosaurus to the Dinosauria and Martin 2003:215). Owen (1841:462) con- because of its four sacral vertebrae. He admitted cluded his initial description with this assess- that it may have had some terrestrial capabilities ment: “The vertebræ, as well as the bones of the but concluded that Cetiosaurus was an estuarine extremities, prove its marine habits .
  • Cretaceous Saurischian Tracksites from Southwest Sichuan Province and Overview of Late Cretaceous Dinosaur Track Assemblages of China

    Cretaceous Saurischian Tracksites from Southwest Sichuan Province and Overview of Late Cretaceous Dinosaur Track Assemblages of China

    Cretaceous Research 56 (2015) 458e469 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Cretaceous Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/CretRes Cretaceous saurischian tracksites from southwest Sichuan Province and overview of Late Cretaceous dinosaur track assemblages of China * Lida Xing a, , Geng Yang b, Jun Cao b, Martin G. Lockley c, Hendrik Klein d, Jianping Zhang a, W. Scott Persons IV e, Haiqian Hu a, Hongjiang Shen b, Xiaomin Zheng b, Yongchao Qin b a School of the Earth Sciences and Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, 100083, China b Regional Geological Survey Team, Sichuan Bureau of Geological Exploration and Development of Mineral Resources, Chengdu, China c Dinosaur Tracks Museum, University of Colorado Denver, PO Box 173364, Denver, CO, 80217, USA d Saurierwelt Palaontologisches€ Museum, Alte Richt 7, D-92318, Neumarkt, Germany e Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, 11455 Saskatchewan Drive, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E9, Canada article info abstract Article history: Dinosaur tracks from Upper Cretaceous deposits of Sichuan Province, China have proved of great sig- Received 16 March 2015 nificance for two reasons: they (1) provide unambiguous evidence of dinosaurs from this epoch in this Received in revised form region, and (2) demonstrate that the track bearing units of the Leidashu Formation are not Paleocene- 11 June 2015 Eocene in age as previously claimed by some authors. We herein describe five small sites, from the Accepted in revised form 18 June 2015 Zhaojue area and the nearby Xide areas. Two sites are dominated by theropod tracks, including one with Available online xxx small tracks of Eubrontes-like morphology, and another with deep tracks revealing long metatarsal impressions, probably indicating a soft substrate.
  • Photographic Atlas and Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of the Holotype Skull of Euhelopus Zdanskyi with Description of Additional Cranial Elements

    Photographic Atlas and Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of the Holotype Skull of Euhelopus Zdanskyi with Description of Additional Cranial Elements

    Photographic Atlas and Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of the Holotype Skull of Euhelopus zdanskyi with Description of Additional Cranial Elements Stephen F. Poropat1,2*, Benjamin P. Kear1 1 Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Uppsala County, Sweden, 2 Australian Age of Dinosaurs Natural History Museum, The Jump-Up, Winton, Queensland, Australia Abstract Background: Euhelopus zdanskyi is one of relatively few sauropod taxa known from an almost complete skull and mandible. Recent phylogenetic analyses suggest that Euhelopus is a somphospondylan titanosauriform, and that it is a member of the clade (Euhelopodidae) which is the sister taxon to the hugely successful, dominantly Cretaceous sauropod group Titanosauria. Methodology/Principal Findings: The skull elements of Euhelopus were CT scanned at Uppsala Akademiska Sjukhuset. Three-dimensional models of the elements were constructed from the DICOM data using Mimics 14.0, InVesalius 3.0, and GeoMagic Studio 2012, the skull was rearticulated in Rhinoceros 4.0, and the final version was rendered in GeoMagic Studio 2012. Conclusions/Significance: The fact that relatively complete sauropod skulls are so rare in the fossil record, particularly among titanosauriforms, means that the skulls that are known should be as thoroughly described and well-illustrated as possible. This contribution supplements previous descriptions of the cranial elements of Euhelopus, one of the few euhelopodid taxa for which cranial material is known, by presenting a comprehensive photographic atlas of the skull elements to facilitate a better understanding of their morphology. We describe several elements which have been overlooked in past studies of Euhelopus, and also provide as accurate a reconstruction of the skull as possible (in the absence of the braincase), the most significant components of which are the articulations of the palate and the mandible.
  • Osteology of Huabeisaurus Allocotus (Sauropoda: Titanosauriformes) from the Upper Cretaceous of China

    Osteology of Huabeisaurus Allocotus (Sauropoda: Titanosauriformes) from the Upper Cretaceous of China

    Osteology of Huabeisaurus allocotus (Sauropoda: Titanosauriformes) from the Upper Cretaceous of China Michael D. D’Emic1*, Philip D. Mannion2, Paul Upchurch3, Roger B. J. Benson4, Qiqing Pang5, Cheng Zhengwu6 1 Anatomical Sciences Department, Stony Brook University, Health Sciences Center, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America, 2 Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, United Kingdom, 3 Department of Earth Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom, 4 Department of Earth Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, 5 Shijiazhuang University of Economics, Shijiazhuang, People’s Republic of China, 6 Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing, People’s Republic of China Abstract Background: The Late Cretaceous titanosauriform sauropod Huabeisaurus allocotus Pang and Cheng is known from teeth and much of the postcranial skeleton. Its completeness makes it an important taxon for integrating and interpreting anatomical observations from more fragmentary Cretaceous East Asian sauropods and for understanding titanosauriform evolution in general. Methodology/Principal Findings: We present a detailed redescription of Huabeisaurus allocotus and a suite of anatomical comparisons with other titanosauriforms that demonstrate its validity via autapomorphies (e.g., division of some presacral vertebral laminae, reduced development of caudal ribs, the development of fossae relative to one another in caudal vertebral neural arches, high tibia-to-femur ratio). Huabeisaurus shares many features with other Cretaceous East Asian sauropods (e.g., pendant cervical ribs, anterior-middle caudal vertebrae with a nearly flat anterior centrum face and a concave posterior centrum face) that are absent in sauropods from other landmasses and strata, suggesting a close relationship among many of these forms within the clade Somphospondyli.
  • A New Titanosauriform Sauropod (Dinosauria: Saurischia) from the Lower Cretaceous of Hyogo, Japan

    A New Titanosauriform Sauropod (Dinosauria: Saurischia) from the Lower Cretaceous of Hyogo, Japan

    Zootaxa 3848 (1): 001–066 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Monograph ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2014 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3848.1.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B72CF242-610B-45E8-A0C4-813EB115FD5B ZOOTAXA 3848 A new titanosauriform sauropod (Dinosauria: Saurischia) from the Lower Cretaceous of Hyogo, Japan HARUO SAEGUSA1,2,3 & TADAHIRO IKEDA1,2 1Institute of Natural and Environmental Sciences, University of Hyogo, Hyogo 669-1546, Japan 2Museum of Nature and Human Activities, Hyogo, Hyogo 669-1546, Japan 3Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand Accepted by S. Brusatte: 5 Jun. 2014; published: 12 Aug. 2014 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 HARUO SAEGUSA & TADAHIRO IKEDA A new titanosauriform sauropod (Dinosauria: Saurischia) from the Lower Cretaceous of Hyogo, Japan (Zootaxa 3848) 66 pp.; 30 cm. 12 Aug. 2014 ISBN 978-1-77557-465-1 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-77557-466-8 (Online edition) FIRST PUBLISHED IN 2014 BY Magnolia Press P.O. Box 41-383 Auckland 1346 New Zealand e-mail: [email protected] http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ © 2014 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5326 (Print edition) ISSN 1175-5334 (Online edition) 2 · Zootaxa 3848 (1) © 2014 Magnolia Press SAEGUSA & IKEDA Table of contents Abstract . 3 Introduction . 3 Systematic paleontology . 4 Dinosauria Owen, 1842 . 5 Saurischia Seeley, 1887 . 5 Sauropoda Marsh, 1878 . 7 Macronaria Wilson and Sereno, 1998 . 9 Titanosauriformes Salgado, Coria, and Calvo, 1997. 53 Discussion . 55 Conclusion. 57 Acknowledgements .
  • Early Evolution of Titanosauriform Sauropod Dinosaurs by Michael

    Early Evolution of Titanosauriform Sauropod Dinosaurs by Michael

    Early evolution of titanosauriform sauropod dinosaurs by Michael Daniel DʼEmic A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Geology) in The University of Michigan 2011 Committee: Associate Professor Jeffrey A. Wilson, chair Assistant Professor Catherine Badgley Professor Tomasz K. Baumiller Professor Daniel C. Fisher Professor Rob van der Voo © Michael DʼEmic 2011 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First, I would like to thank my dissertation committee: C. Badgley, T. Baumiller, D. Fisher, R. van der Voo, and J. A. Wilson for advice and guidance during the project. Special thanks to J. A. Wilson for constant support, guidance, and research opportunities over the years. Thanks for field assistance and support from P. Christenson, T. Churchill, B. Dauksewicz, B. Foreman, P. Gingerich, A. Hayden, D. Klein, S. Macone, C. Manz, K. Melstrom, D. Raisanen, A. Tillett, and C. Youngs. Thanks to M. Fox (YPM), D. Nixon (SMU), C. Manz, K. Melstrom, and B. Sanders (UM) for preparation. Special thanks to A. Pan, L. Ballinger (FWMSH) and D. Colodner (ASDM) for permission to destructively sample limb bones for histology, and M. Sander and K. Stein for helpful technical information about drilling sauropod bones. Thanks to D. C. Fisher for use of thin-sectioning equipment and K. M. Smith for assistance. J. A. Wilson, M. Wedel and R. Barnes kindly provided parts of figures 4.1, 4.6 and 4.7, respectively. Thanks to the administrative staff of the UM Geological Sciences Department, especially N. Kingsbury and A. Hudon for much help over the years. Collections managers and curators at the following institutions are thanked for their help and hospitality, without which this dissertation certainly would not have been possible: C.
  • NECK POSTURE, DENTITION, and FEEDING STRATEGIES in JURASSIC SAUROPOD DINOSAURS KENT A. STEVENS and J. MICHAEL PARRISH Departmen

    NECK POSTURE, DENTITION, and FEEDING STRATEGIES in JURASSIC SAUROPOD DINOSAURS KENT A. STEVENS and J. MICHAEL PARRISH Departmen

    NECK POSTURE, DENTITION, AND FEEDING STRATEGIES IN JURASSIC SAUROPOD DINOSAURS KENT A. STEVENS and J. MICHAEL PARRISH Department of Computer and Information Science University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403; Department of Biological Sciences Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL 60115 Stevens: (541) 346-4430 (office) (541) 346-5373 (fax) [email protected] 2 INTRODUCTION Sauropod dinosaurs represent the extremes of both gigantism and neck elongation in the history of terrestrial vertebrates. Neck lengths were extreme in both absolute and relative measure. The necks of the Jurassic sauropods Barosaurus and Brachiosaurus were about 9m long, well over twice the length of their dorsal columns. Even the relatively short-necked Camarasaurus, with a cervical column about 3.5 m long, had a neck substantially longer than its trunk. Because of their elongate necks, massive bulk, abundance, and diversity, the feeding habits of the sauropod dinosaurs of the Jurassic period has been a subject of inquiry and dispute since relatively complete fossils of this clade were first discovered over 100 years ago. Analysis of the functional morphology and paleoecology of sauropods has led to a diversity of interpretations of their feeding habits. Sauropods have been interpreted as high browsers, low browsers, aquatic, terrestrial, bipedal, tripodal, and have even been restored with elephant-style probosces. Furthermore, differences in neck length, body shape, cranial anatomy, and dental morphology. Here we will review various lines of evidence relating to feeding in sauropods and reconsider them in light of our own studies on neck pose, mobility, and inferred feeding envelopes in Jurassic sauropods. Sauropods varied considerably in body plan and size, resulting in a range of head heights across the different taxa, when feeding in a neutral, quadrupedal stance.
  • This Electronic Thesis Or Dissertation Has Been Downloaded from Explore Bristol Research

    This Electronic Thesis Or Dissertation Has Been Downloaded from Explore Bristol Research

    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from Explore Bristol Research, http://research-information.bristol.ac.uk Author: Apostolaki, Naomi Title: The evolution of pneumaticity in Sauropodomorpha and its correlation to body size General rights Access to the thesis is subject to the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International Public License. A copy of this may be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode This license sets out your rights and the restrictions that apply to your access to the thesis so it is important you read this before proceeding. Take down policy Some pages of this thesis may have been removed for copyright restrictions prior to having it been deposited in Explore Bristol Research. However, if you have discovered material within the thesis that you consider to be unlawful e.g. breaches of copyright (either yours or that of a third party) or any other law, including but not limited to those relating to patent, trademark, confidentiality, data protection, obscenity, defamation, libel, then please contact [email protected] and include the following information in your message: •Your contact details •Bibliographic details for the item, including a URL •An outline nature of the complaint Your claim will be investigated and, where appropriate, the item in question will be removed from public view as soon as possible. This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from Explore Bristol Research, http://research-information.bristol.ac.uk Author: Apostolaki, Naomi Title: The evolution of pneumaticity in Sauropodomorpha and its correlation to body size General rights Access to the thesis is subject to the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International Public License.