DOCSLIB.ORG

Understanding the Rio+20 Conference

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Understanding the Rio+20 Conference Building a fair green economy and democratic governance of the planet in a framework of sustainable development 20-22 june 2012 1 This analysis report was written by: Miriam CANGUSSU TOMAZ GARCIA Emeline DIAZ Vaia TUUHIA Geneviève VERBRUGGE Pierre RADANNE Dossiers et Débats pour le Développement Durable. (4D – 150-154, rue du Faubourg Saint-Martin – 75001 Paris – www.association4d.org) With the financial support of: It was funded by the Ministry for Ecology, Sustainable Development and Energy, The Agence Française de Développement, the Fond Français pour l’Environnement Mondial and the Agence de l’Environnement de la Maitrise de l’Energie. This report is also published in English. It is available on the following sites: www.iepf.org and www.association4d.org. 2 WHY WRITE AN ANALYSIS REPORT? In the course of the months spent preparing for the Rio Conference, a worrying fact came to light: there is a terrible gap between the importance of what is at stake, the aggravation of all sorts of crises and the lack of clarity in visions for the future, the weakness of political proposals and especially the inability of countries to adopt converging positions. This is all expressed in texts that are difficult to understand, that fail to explain the stakes or evaluate the efforts of the last twenty years, or to highlight the possible progress that needs to be made. It is impossible to meet the world’s expectations without respecting the fundamental loyalty that underpins transparency. This realisation motivated the Organisation Internationale de la Francophonie in partnership with the association 4D (Dossiers et Débats pour le Développment Durable) to write an analysis for the Summit, based on the following objectives to: • Help everyone to understand the true stakes of the negotiation by doing away with any jargon. • Describe the state of play of the points of the negotiation that constitute the basis for moving forward. • Report on obstacles and identify progress and potential areas of convergence that point towards a successful future for all peoples and that is coherent with achieving global balance. • Transcribe the points that could be used in a potential agreement, as well as the ideas for a future mandate. This is all the more necessary as the media find it difficult to access all the elements required for a full understanding of the subject, and rarely have enough time and space to take its full complexity into account. Given the difficulty and the highly scientific nature of the contents of most environmental issues linked to social and economic questions, we consider it essential to outline and re- contextualise the issues at stake in this analysis report. It is all the more useful to do this, as the 2012 Conference is part of a cycle of Earth Summits that are held every ten years. This analysis report aims to provide a tool for international negotiators, media, and more broadly speaking, all economic actors, professions, private and public sectors, to enable them to follow the ins and outs of these complex negotiations that cover vast stakes (development, equity, climate, biodiversity, desertification, economy, finance, governance…). This analysis report also aims to provide an update in accessible language on the technical sticking points of the negotiations and especially on the political stakes as well as impacts on society. This requires training if the negotiations are to take the high road and include maximum participation. It is all the more necessary as the organisation of this conference poses a problem in terms of limitation of numbers of participants, imposed by the host country. This Memoradum is aimed at everyone who will not be able to take part in the Rio Conference but who would like to understand the facts at the outset and be able to better follow the progress from afar and subsequently transpose things into their practice and commitments. In order to do this, and to remain as neutral and as complete as possible, as well as presenting all the issues at stake in this process, this document will be widely communicated and submitted for modification and contributions to various actors (NGOs, politicians, scientists, country negotiators…) The opinions expressed in this analysis report are the author’s alone, and do not represent any official position of any Member States of the French-speaking community. 3 Dedication to Ms Gro Harlem Brundtland, We wish you to be fully aware, Madam, that the pale sun of Norway has lighted up our lives, with your report ‘Our Common Future’, written in 1987. You probably do not know us; but those writing to you a part of the world as a whole. We shall live out our lives on this planet. We shall do everything in our power to succeed in achieving sustainable development for humankind as a whole. This new Summit in Rio looks like being difficult. Yet humankind lives on hope; indifference causes humans to fade and feel worthless; violence destroys humankind: you had to confront this issue yourself last year. In this new negotiation, few commitments are being made, or funding dedicated. We therefore need to outline a roadmap that will help us to change and achieve a new development model - new civilizations – totally based on the Sustainable Development Goals, aka the Millennium Development Goals. We need to build new global governance. This will be far more difficult than in Rio in 1992 or in Kyoto; it will therefore take time. But with new communication tools, a gigantic web is being woven around the entire planet, one of actors on the move. Their initiatives, practice and cooperation will enable us to extend the work of Agenda 21s, the strategies for sustainable development in both companies and countries. The objective is to successfully set humanity on a road over the course of this century, to guarantee the future for our children and grandchildren. • The structure of this document - The first part of this analysis is devoted to considering the current state of the world that has changed a lot since the Rio Conference of 1992, and the issues currently confronting the global community (“The stakes in a changing world”). - It is followed by an evaluation of the tentative solutions proposed by previous conferences in terms of sustainable development, and an explanation of the workings of the current negotiation process (“The solutions proposed by the Summits on sustainable development”). - And finally, we shall explore the potential paths to meet the challenges (“The real solutions to meet the challenges of the future”). This includes the need to consider the ultimate objective of these negotiations: to build a new development model that satisfies everyone. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. The issues at stake in a world of change ............................................................................ 9 1. The legacy of the 20th century ........................................................................................ 9 1.1. The three forms of globalisation ............................................................................. 10 1.2. The impacts of globalisation ................................................................................... 11 1.3. Stakes of the 21st century ...................................................................................... 13 2. Challenges of the 21st century ....................................................................................... 15 3. The founding principles of the 21st century .................................................................. 17 3.1. The responsibility .................................................................................................... 17 3.2. Solidarity ................................................................................................................. 18 3.3. The Commons or declaring the universal interest of Humankind ....................... 19 3.4. Sustainability: optimising resources, sobriety and respect for the limits of the planet and ecosystems ....................................................................................................... 21 3.5. Equity and Social justice ........................................................................................ 22 II. Tentative responses by the Earth Summit on sustainable development ....................... 25 1. The history of the concept of Sustainable Development .............................................. 25 1.1. The integration of economic and social issues: a difficult question ...................... 25 1.2. The appearance of the environmental question .................................................... 26 1.3. The ambiguity caused by presenting sustainable development through the three pillars 27 2. The Summits on Environment and Sustainable Development ................................... 27 2.1. The emergence of strong principles and genuine awareness ............................... 30 2.2. Challenges to the implementation of decisions and commitments made by Summits ............................................................................................................................. 35 3. The Millennium Development Goals ............................................................................. 42 4. The weak implementation of the progress made in Johannesburg ............................. 44 4.1. The key commitments, objectives and time-lines of the Johannesburg action plan. .................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • The Importance of the Rio Conventions to the Cooperative Republic of Guyana

    The Importance of the Rio Conventions to the Cooperative Republic of Guyana

    Target: Tertiary Educational Institutions The Importance of the Rio Conventions to the Cooperative Republic of Guyana What are the Rio Conventions? The Rio Conventions are three international agreements initiated in 1992 at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) or Earth Summit held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. These Conventions, United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity (UNCBD), United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD), help Governments rethink economic development and find ways to prevent the destruction of irreplaceable natural resources and avoid global pollution. As follow-up to the Summit and to declare its readiness to participate in the process to ensure that environmental considerations are factored into social and economic decisions, Guyana signed on to the Rio Conventions in 1992. The Government of Guyana ratified the UNCBD and the UNFCCC on August 29, 1994 and almost three years later, on June 26, 1997, endorsed the UNCCD. United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity (UNCBD) The United Nations Convention of Biological Diversity (UNCBD) is a framework convention that has three goals for the conservation and sustainably use of biodiversity, while promoting economic development. The goals are: • conservation of biological diversity for future generations; • exploitation of biological diversity in a sustainable way; and • sharing the benefits from the use of genetic resources in a fair and equitable manner. The UNCBD is essential for food security, medicines, fresh air, water, shelter, and a clean and healthy environment in which to live. It supports efforts to provide knowledge and fill information gaps on the management of biodiversity.
  • EARTH SUMMITS-WPS Office.Pdf

    EARTH SUMMITS-WPS Office.Pdf

    EARTH SUMMITS The decennial meetings/ conferences/ conventions of the world leaders organized by United Nations Organization (UNO) are commonly known as 'Earth Summits'. The main objectives of the UN earth summits are to bring together the national heads or their representatives and organizations at a common forum (i) to identify and update the issues/ challenges related to earth and its environment; (ii) to quantify them; (iii) to identify and look into probable solutions and remedial measures; and (iv) to develop and effective plan of action. Initiated by the UNO, the first earth summit was organized in the year 1972 at Stockholm, Sweden. After that at a regular interval of 10 years the earth summits are being held, the last one in 2012 at Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The list of UN Earth Summits: (1) United Nations Conference on the Human Environment at Stockholm (UNCHS): The UNCHS was held from 5th to 16th June, 1972 at Stockholm, Sweden. It was UN's first major conference on global environmental issues. Leaders and representatives from 114 governments attended the conference. The action plan of the UNCHS contained 109 recommendations covering 6 broad issues. They were - (i) human settlement, (ii) natural resource management, (iii) pollution control, (iv) educational and social aspects of environment, (v) environment and development, and (vi) the role of international organizations. (2) Earth Summit of Nairobi, Kenya: The second UN earth summit was held at Nairobi, the capital city of Kenya, Africa from 10th to 18th May, 1992. But on account of some political issues and intervention of USA, the Nairobi summit is not considered an Earth Summit officially.
  • Bringing the Ocean Back Into the Earth Summit

    Bringing the Ocean Back Into the Earth Summit

    BRINGING THE OCEAN BACK INTO THE EARTH SUMMIT INTRODUCTION The United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (UNCSD) will take place in Brazil in 2012 to mark the 20th anniversary of the 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) in Rio de Janeiro, and the 10th anniversary of the 2002 World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) in Johannesburg. It is being convened under United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) resolution 64/236.1 UNCED and WSSD are remembered as Earth Summit 1 and Earth Summit 2 respectively; it is likely that UNCSD will be remembered as Earth Summit 3. With 70% of the Earth covered by the ocean, and given the importance of the ocean as the life support system of Planet Earth, it is time for UNCSD to pay due attention to the needs of the ocean, and to the hundreds of millions of people who depend on healthy ocean ecosystems for their very survival. It is especially fitting as 2012, the year UNCSD will take place, marks the 30th anniversary of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS, Montego Bay, December, 1982). BACKGROUND The major documents underpinning UNCSD include2 the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development,3 Agenda 21,4 the Programme for the Further Implementation of Agenda 21,5 the Johannesburg Declaration on Sustainable Development and the Plan of Implementation of the World Summit on Sustainable Development, also known as the Johannesburg Plan of Implementation. Chapter 17 of Agenda 21 adopted at UNCED remains the fundamental programme of action for achieving sustainable development with respect to the oceans.
  • United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development

    United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development

    The Scottish Parliament and Scottish Parliament Infor mation C entre l ogos. SPICe Briefing Rio+20: United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development 19 June 2012 12/42 Gareth Fenney Between 20 and 22 June 2012 global leaders will meet along with participants from governments, the private sector, NGOs and other groups in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil for the UN Conference on Sustainable Development. The conference marks the 20th anniversary of the 1992 UN Conference on Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro. This briefing outlines what has happened since 1992, and what the expectations are for this year‟s meeting. Image: United Nations CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................................. 3 BACKGROUND............................................................................................................................................................ 4 SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT ................................................................................................................................ 4 WHAT IS SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT? .......................................................................................................... 4 POLICY TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT ........................................................................................... 4 PURPOSE OF THE UN CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT ........................................................ 5 OUTCOMES OF PREVIOUS EARTH
  • From Stockholm to New York, Via Rio and Johannesburg: Has the Environment Lost Its Way on the Global Agenda?

    From Stockholm to New York, Via Rio and Johannesburg: Has the Environment Lost Its Way on the Global Agenda?

    Fordham International Law Journal Volume 29, Issue 5 2005 Article 3 From Stockholm to New York, via Rio and Johannesburg: Has the Environment Lost its Way on the Global Agenda? Paolo Galizzi∗ ∗ Copyright c 2005 by the authors. Fordham International Law Journal is produced by The Berke- ley Electronic Press (bepress). http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ilj From Stockholm to New York, via Rio and Johannesburg: Has the Environment Lost its Way on the Global Agenda? Paolo Galizzi Abstract This Article will examine the response of the international community to the compelling evi- dence on the environmental crisis facing our Planet. It will analyze the place of the environment in the international agenda from the early 1970s, when an international environmental agenda emerged, to the 2005 World Summit, where Heads of State and Government gathered to renew their commitment to the international agenda for the twenty-first century agreed at the Millennium Summit. More specifically, the Article will examine the “comprehensive” international environ- mental agenda that has emerged within the U.N. FROM STOCKHOLM TO NEW YORK, VIA RIO AND JOHANNESBURG: HAS THE ENVIRONMENT LOST ITS WAY ON THE GLOBAL AGENDA? Paolo Galizzi* In the streets of a crowded city, in the aisles of a giant super- market, or on the floor of a gleaming electronics factory, the biological state of Earth's rivers, forests, and mountains may seem a remote concern. Yet, despite the breakneck pace of technological change many of us have seen in our lifetimes, we each depend far more than we may realize on the web of life of which we are a part.
  • TOWARDS a GENDER-RESPONSIVE IMPLEMENTATION of the CONVENTION on BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY Note by the Executive Secretary 1

    TOWARDS a GENDER-RESPONSIVE IMPLEMENTATION of the CONVENTION on BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY Note by the Executive Secretary 1

    CBD Distr. GENERAL CBD/COP/14/INF/21 1 November 2018 ENGLISH ONLY CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY Fourteenth meeting Sharm El-Sheikh, Egypt, 17-29 November 2018 Item 17 of the provisional agenda* TOWARDS A GENDER-RESPONSIVE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY Note by the Executive Secretary 1. The present document was initially prepared by UN Women, with inputs from the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), Bioversity International, the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) and the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, for the capacity- building workshop on gender mainstreaming in the implementation of the Convention. The workshop was co-organized by UN Women and the Secretariat of the Convention, and was held in Montreal, Canada, on 1 July 2018. This document was updated following the workshop. 2. It first sets the context by presenting the gender dimensions of biodiversity conservation and the global norms on gender equality and natural resource management. It then outlines the key mandates for the integration of a gender perspective in biodiversity conservation and identifies the main entry points for strengthening gender considerations in decisions of the Parties to the Convention and in the implementation of the Convention, as well as in the future work of Parties and other stakeholders. Gender-responsive practices contributing to biodiversity conservation at the local and country level are then presented to highlight promising
  • The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and Addressing Climate Change

    The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and Addressing Climate Change

    Discussion Paper The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and Addressing Climate Change Independent Commission on Multilateralism February 2016 Introduction 2015 was a watershed year for the United Nations. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the Paris Agreement on Climate Change were adopted with an unprecedented sense of ownership by member states, and both are universally applicable. The Third International Conference on Financing for Development and the Third World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction also form part of the new policy framework. In 2016, the UN has the opportunity and the challenge to operate under the most comprehensive sustainable development agenda in its history. The open and inclusive nature of the process that led to the adoption of the 2030 Agenda and the Paris Agreement on Climate Change has renewed the international community’s faith in multilateralism. However, to implement these outcomes, the UN needs to change its working methods and update its structures from 1945. I. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development On September 25, 2015, at the UN Sustainable Development Summit, 193 governments took the historic step of adopting the 2030 Agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The preamble of the 2030 Agenda clearly defines its purpose: “a plan of action for people, planet and prosperity” that also “seeks to strengthen universal peace in larger freedom.” The 2030 Agenda breaks manifold paradigms. First, the three fundamental pillars of development— economic, social, and environmental—are integrated. Second, it is universally applicable; all countries, from north and south, signed up to implement it. Third, it includes issues that had remained outside the scope of development, particularly peace and climate change.
  • Sustainable Development: Legal Issues and Incentives - J

    Sustainable Development: Legal Issues and Incentives - J

    DIMENSIONS OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT – Vol. I - Sustainable Development: Legal Issues and Incentives - J. H. Archer, M. P. Eppling, and C. A. Biegel, SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: LEGAL ISSUES AND INCENTIVES J. H. Archer, M. P. Eppling, and C. A. Biegel Graduate Department of Environmental, Coastal, and Ocean Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Boston, USA Keywords: Sustainable development, sustainable development law, legal issues, legal instruments, carrying capacity, intergenerational equity, Rio Declaration, Agenda 21, climate change, biodiversity, desertification, emissions trading, toxic chemicals, hazardous waste, transboundary, command and control, environmental taxes, carbon tax, emissions tax, transferable discharge permit, tradable emissions permit, deposit- refund system, subsidy, property rights. Contents 1. Introduction 2. Background 2.1. The Rio Conference 2.1.1. The Rio Declaration 2.1.2. Agenda 21 2.2. The Road to Rio 2.3. After Rio 2.3.1. International Institutional Developments 2.3.2. International Legal Developments 2.3.3. Evaluating Progress Since Rio 3. Critical Issues 3.1. Identifying Sustainable Development Law 3.2. Definitional Issues 3.3. Intergenerational Equity 4. The Capacity of Sustainable Development Principles to Generate Standards 5. Compliance and Enforceability 5.1. Nature of Legal Instruments 5.2. Political, Institutional, and Monitoring Requirements 5.3. Enforcement of and Compliance with International Environmental Regimes 5.4. TransboundaryUNESCO Issues – EOLSS 6. Incentives for Sustainable Development 6.1. Command and Control Policies 6.2. Economic InstrumentsSAMPLE CHAPTERS 6.2.1. Environmental Taxes 6.2.2. Transferable Discharge Permits 6.2.3. Deposit-Refund Systems 6.2.4. Subsidies 6.2.5. Property Rights 6.3. One Size Does Not Fit All: The Need for an Integrated Approach 6.4.
  • Justification Regarding PSTET Paper-1 Questions

    Justification Regarding PSTET Paper-1 Questions

    Effi rfs*a um tfary" fefun'* +r h.B fiqri.Et Lfr.FE, riilu tf"* +ilr di{&{H, Br_8, )iia.B.)fu -., ,rrc1 tr-5 6: 0172-2212221 , sA6: [email protected] rrsfora tfa rifrE ffiI r,rfonr.nra ,frr= }pe 20fi fHH E1 rn-njrra ffi- 2s.02.18 d aEl E1,a r#lif"p* ff,ffi; - *-= * rffi1rro qTrs -" Effi;fi, * is tr fu mdffira-f€-dT .1 ;s-p-fo3 3 iffi mel ir faJ u-g,-dE DldIfu, .x1.S.nr.,-s.t. s1o fu rimu r zffi:- r. ffi*,-g, eTfun-c 2.7t7xF'frffiilffi-Ir5 -/-r"-' tt Tacher Eligibility Test-2o17 held on ".subJect: PuqJab State 25.o2.2o,.a-EvaluationofTQuestionsofPSTET.I. ,,, This is with reference to Your Memo No. K.W. 6/ 180- 17D(3)/ 508 '.i,, clated 06l006l2Ol8 on the subject cited above vide which it was asked to send the Para-wise comments on the enclosed representation cll some candidatcs. In this connection, it is intimated that in Para 8, somd carrdidates raised objections on 7 questions. The Answers of all these 7 question$ lave been got rechecked- form the subject experts and it was found that the answers as mentioned in the revised answer key are absolutcll' 7 qucstir)Ils ill-e t correct. I-lowevcr, the question-wise comments of these given below: Set Set Rcmarks A C ffi ir rptid b'(st;klr;Gi:"r'riii ii-] thc supported by thc evidances/proof's/inragcs rvith i attachements-fiom page I to 10. =-.--r- . ,-1 .l i / t-'.^.,;,'.'arm,rht,r I I 127 r50 ilr; Co.r*i Ans*e, is option 'cl'([',nviorrtmental---.
  • The Road to Rio+20

    The Road to Rio+20

    The UNEP Magazine for Youth for young people · by young people · about young people The road to Rio+20 Half the planet, one voice Green jobs, green options 1 Tunza_9.3_Engv4.indd 1 23/11/2011 18:31 TUNZA the UNEP magazine CONTENTS for youth. To view current and past issues of this publication online, The Bandung Declaration 3 please visit www.unep.org New beginnings at Rio+20 4 United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) PO Box 30552, Nairobi, Kenya Half the planet, one voice 6 Tel (254 20) 7621 234 Fax (254 20) 7623 927 A week of inspiration 6 Telex 22068 UNEP KE E-mail [email protected] We were there! 7 www.unep.org In with the new 8 ISSN 1727-8902 Six minutes to save the Earth 10 Director of Publications Nick Nuttall Editor Geoffrey Lean Earth Summits and Multilateral 12 Special Contributor Wondwosen Asnake Environmental Agreements Youth Editor Karen Eng Guest Editor Daniela Jaramillo Troya Nairobi Coordinator Naomi Poulton Green jobs, green options 14 Head, UNEP’s Children and Youth Unit Theodore Oben Enjoying the BYEE buzz 16 Circulation Manager Mohamed Atani Sharing inspiration 17 Design Edward Cooper, Ecuador Production Banson Young leaders 18 Cover photo Phade71/Flickr Youth contributors Andrew Bartolo (Malta); Alina Start with yourself 20 Bezhenar (Russia); María del Refugio Boa Alvarado (Mexico); Mariana Carnasciali (Brazil); Ella Cunnison Seven steps into the future 22 (UK); Sebastien Duyck (France); Elham Fadaly (Egypt); Aghnia Fasza (Indonesia); Mary Jade P. Gabanes Beyond the art of the probable 24 (Philippines); Shakeem Goddard (St Lucia); Christopher Grant (St Vincent & Grenadines); Anisa Haernissa (Indonesia); Hu Ching (Singapore); M.
  • Review of Implementation of Agenda 21 and the Rio Principles

    Review of Implementation of Agenda 21 and the Rio Principles

    United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Division for Sustainable Development Sustainable Development in the 21st century (SD21) Review of implementation of Agenda 21 and the Rio Principles Detailed review of implementation of the Rio Principles December 2011 DRAFT Study prepared by the Stakeholder Forum for a Sustainable Future Acknowledgements This study is part of the Sustainable Development in the 21st century (SD21) project. The project is implemented by the Division for Sustainable Development of the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs and funded by the European Commission - Directorate-General for Environment - Thematic Programme for Environment and sustainable management of Natural Resources, including energy (ENRTP). Support from the European Commission is gratefully acknowledged. The study was carried out by Stakeholder Forum for a Sustainable Future (SF), under the supervision of David Le Blanc (UN-DESA). Within SF, Kirsty Schneeberger, Hannah Stoddart and Farooq Ullah participated in the editorial team. Contributors on individual chapters of the report were Nicholas Allen, Margaret Araujo Dantas, Isabel Bottoms, Robert Clews, Amy Cutter, Beth Harrison, Ian Fenn, Paul Heigl, Emma Mullins, Maliha Muzammil, Emma Norris, Nicola Peart, Kirsty Schneeberger, Andrew Shaw, and Sara Svensson. Claire Fellini (UN-DESA) prepared the manuscript. This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the United nations
  • Review of Implementation of Agenda 21 and the Rio Principles Synthesis

    Review of Implementation of Agenda 21 and the Rio Principles Synthesis

    Sustainable Development in the 21st century (SD21) Review of implementation of Agenda 21 and the Rio Principles Synthesis Study prepared by the Stakeholder Forum for a Sustainable Future January 2012 Design by formatoverde.pt All photographs by © United Nations Acknowledgement This study is part of the Sustainable Development in the 21st century (SD21) project. The project is implemented by the Division for Sustainable Development of the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs and funded by the European Commission - Directorate-General for Environment - Thematic Programme for Environment and sustainable management of Natural Resources, including energy (ENRTP). Support from the European Commission is gratefully acknowledged. This report was done by Felix Dodds, Kirsty Schneeberger and Farooq Ullah from Stakeholder Forum for the Future, under the supervision of David Le Blanc (UN-DESA). This report has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. Synthesis | Review of Implementation of Agenda 21 and The Rio Principles III Contents Introduction ............................................................ 1 Implementation of Agenda 21 ................................ 1 Implementation of the Rio Principles ..................... 2 Methodology .......................................................... 3 Detailed assessments