DOCSLIB.ORG

Richard Ober Papers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c81z4b3g No online items Register of the Richard Ober papers Finding aid prepared by Dale Reed Hoover Institution Archives 434 Galvez Mall Stanford University Stanford, CA, 94305-6003 (650) 723-3563 [email protected] © 2019 Register of the Richard Ober 2019C20 1 papers Title: Richard Ober papers Date (inclusive): 1942-2001 Collection Number: 2019C20 Contributing Institution: Hoover Institution Archives Language of Material: English Physical Description: 28 manuscript boxes(11.2 linear feet) Abstract: Correspondence, writings, notes, personnel records, memoranda, reports, legal records, and printed matter, relating to the Central Intelligence Agency and its Operation CHAOS. Consists mainly of reportage of post-Watergate debate on intelligence agency oversight and of documentation of related litigation. Physical Location: Hoover Institution Archives Creator: Ober, Richard, 1921-2001 Access The collection is open for research; materials must be requested at least two business days in advance of intended use. Publication Rights For copyright status, please contact the Hoover Institution Archives. Preferred Citation [Identification of item], Richard Ober papers, [Box no., Folder no. or title], Hoover Institution Archives Acquisition Information Materials were acquired by the Hoover Institution Archives in 2018. Accruals Materials may have been added to the collection since this finding aid was prepared. To determine if this has occurred, find the collection in Stanford University's online catalog at http://searchworks.stanford.edu/ . Materials have been added to the collection if the number of boxes listed in the catalog is larger than the number of boxes listed in this finding aid. 1921 Born, New York City 1943 A.B., Harvard University 1943-1946 U.S. Army service 1948 M.A., Columbia University Joined Central Intelligence Agency 1964 Graduate, National War College 1967-1972 Chief, Central Intelligence Agency Counterintelligence Special Operations Group 1972-1974 Chief, Central Intelligence Agency Counterintelligence International Terrorism Group 1974-1976 Director for Intelligence Coordination, National Security Council 1980 Retired from Central Intelligence Agency 2001 Died, Fairfax Station, Virginia Scope and Content of Collection The Richard Ober papers are narrowly focused on Operation CHAOS, a program conducted by the United States Central Intelligence Agency from 1967 to 1972 for the purpose of surveillance and infiltration of dissident and radical movements in the United States, including antiwar, black power and left-wing organizations. The program complemented the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation's older counterintelligence program, COINTELPRO. The Central Intelligence Agency's rationale for entering into domestic activities was to investigate the possibility of foreign influence in the target organizations. The programs became publicly known in consequence of revelations following upon and associated with the Watergate scandal. Beginning in 1974 they occasioned intense publicity and investigation by multiple Congressional and other government bodies. Richard Ober, a career Central Intelligence Agency official, directed Operation CHAOS throughout its five-year existence. Subsequently he was seconded to the United States National Security Council as its senior staff member for intelligence matters. The publicity he received following revelation of the existence of Operation CHAOS prompted the Agency to seek severance of his employment. He resisted this, but was retired in 1980. Key series in the collection are those formed around the numerous investigations of intelligence community activities: the Central Intelligence Agency Domestic Intelligence Report File (the Agency's report on itself); the Commission on CIA Activities within the United States File (the so-called Rockefeller Commission after its chairman, Vice President Nelson A. Rockefeller); the Commission on the Reorganization of the Government for the Conduct of Foreign Policy File (the so-called Murphy Commission after its chairman, Ambassador Robert D. Murphy); the Senate Select Committee to Study Register of the Richard Ober 2019C20 2 papers Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities File (the so-called Church Committee after its chairman, Senator Frank Church); the House Committees File (especially the so-called Pike Committee, after its chairman, Congressman Otis G. Pike); and the Department of Justice Report File (regarding the mail-opening component of Operation CHAOS). The Legal Cases File is concerned with the numerous subsequent civil lawsuits brought by individuals and organizations against government agencies and officials. Typically these cases involved both numerous plaintiffs and numerous defendants. Ober figured as a defendant in all but one--a potential legal case revolving around the unauthorized biography of Washington Post publisher Katharine Graham by Deborah Davis. Davis mistakenly named Ober as Deep Throat and Ober figured here as a potential plaintiff. There is also a specifically titled Operation CHAOS File. This consists of redacted internal documents from Operation CHAOS that were made public in the course of the various legal cases. They shed light on the program's general guidelines as well as on some specific operations. The large General Intelligence File consists primarily of press coverage of the intense debate over the proper role and oversight of the intelligence community that ensued during the latter half of the 1970s. There are a few additional small series not specifically connected with Operation CHAOS issues. These include Ober's Army Personnel File, Central Intelligence Agency Personnel File, and National Security Council Personnel File. In 1963-1964 Ober was a student at the National War College. His National War College File is mainly concerned with his participation in a group student visit to Africa, as is the associated Audiovisual File. Subjects and Indexing Terms United States. Central Intelligence Agency. Secret service--United States. Box/Folder 1 : 1 Army Personnel File 1942-1952 Scope and Contents note Military personnel file of Richard Ober. Includes Reserve Officers Training Corps and Army Reserve materials, orders, and memoranda. Boxes 1-2 Central Intelligence Agency Personnel File 1948-1980 Scope and Contents note Personnel file of Richard Ober as a Central Intelligence Agency employee. Box/Folder 1 : 2 Questionnaires and personnel action notifications 1948-1979 General Scope and Contents note Contains correspondence, memoranda, lists and notes. Box/Folder 1 : 3 1951-1974 Box/Folder 1 : 4 1975 Box/Folder 1 : 5 1976 Box/Folder 1 : 6 1977-1978 Box/Folder 1 : 7 1979-1980 Box/Folder 1 : 8 Request for documents 1978 Scope and Contents note Includes correspondence together with redacted document copies. Box/Folder 1 : 9 Appeal of proposed separation 1978 Scope and Contents note Contains correspondence and memoranda. Includes redacted copies of earlier personnel file documents. Register of the Richard Ober 2019C20 3 papers Central Intelligence Agency Personnel File 1948-1980 Box/Folder 1 : 10 Retirement 1980 Scope and Contents note Contains memoranda and drafts. Box/Folder 1 : 11 Travel authorizations and miscellany 1974-1979 Writings Box/Folder 2 : 1 "Recommendations on Intelligence from the Murphy and Rockefeller Commission Reports" (internal memorandum by Ober) 1975 Scope and Contents note Typescript "The U.S. Intelligence Community Today" (internal study by Ober) 1978 Box/Folder 2 : 2-4 Drafts Box/Folder 2 : 5 Notes Box/Folder 2 : 6-7 Working materials Boxes 2-4 National War College File 1963-1964 Scope and Contents note Papers of Richard Ober as a National War College student. Box/Folder 2 : 8 General 1963-1964 Scope and Contents note Contains correspondence, memoranda, lists, and handbooks. Box/Folder 2 : 9 Research paper 1963-1964 Scope and Contents note Contains memoranda, guidelines, and a letter. Trip to Africa 1964 Scope and Contents note Contains memoranda, itineraries, travel documents, briefing materials, and printed matter. See also Audiovisual File. Box/Folder 3 : 1 General Box/Folder 3 : 2 Senegal Box/Folder 3 : 3 Ghana Box/Folder 3 : 4 Congo Box/Folder 3 : 5-6 Angola Box/Folder 3 : 7 Southern Rhodesia Box/Folder 4 : 1 Southern Rhodesia Box/Folder 4 : 2 Kenya Box/Folder 4 : 3 Ethiopia Box/Folder 4 : 4 Nigeria Box/Folder 4 : 5 National Security Council Personnel File 1974-1976 Scope and Contents note Personnel file of Richard Ober as a National Security Council employee. Contains correspondence, memoranda, lists, and notes. Boxes 4-5 Central Intelligence Agency Domestic Intelligence Report File 1974-1975 Scope and Contents note File on a report by Central Intelligence Agency Director William E. Colby to President Gerald R. Ford on domestic intelligence activities of the Central Intelligence Agency. Box/Folder 4 : 6 Text of report, 1974, with publicly released redacted appendices, 1975 Box/Folder 5 : 1 Press coverage 1974-1975 Register of the Richard Ober 2019C20 4 papers Commission on CIA Activities within the United States File 1974-1977 Boxes 5-6 Commission on CIA Activities within the United States File 1974-1977 Scope and Contents note File on a report by commission established by President Gerald R. Ford and chaired by Vice President Nelson A. Rockefeller (Rockefeller Commission). Box/Folder 5 : 2 Text of report 1975 Scope and Contents note Printed copy Box/Folder 5 : 3 Excerpts of report leaked to press
Recommended publications
  • The Watergate Story (Washingtonpost.Com)

    The Watergate Story (Washingtonpost.Com)

    The Watergate Story (washingtonpost.com) Hello corderoric | Change Preferences | Sign Out TODAY'S NEWSPAPER Subscribe | PostPoints NEWS POLITICS OPINIONS BUSINESS LOCAL SPORTS ARTS & GOING OUT JOBS CARS REAL RENTALS CLASSIFIEDS LIVING GUIDE ESTATE SEARCH: washingtonpost.com Web | Search Archives washingtonpost.com > Politics> Special Reports 'Deep Throat' Mark Felt Dies at 95 The most famous anonymous source in American history died Dec. 18 at his home in Santa Rosa, Calif. "Whether ours shall continue to be a government of laws and not of men is now before Congress and ultimately the American people." A curious crime, two young The courts, the Congress and President Nixon refuses to After 30 years, one of reporters, and a secret source a special prosecutor probe release the tapes and fires the Washington's best-kept known as "Deep Throat" ... the burglars' connections to special prosecutor. A secrets is exposed. —Special Prosecutor Archibald Cox after his Washington would be the White House and decisive Supreme Court firing, Oct. 20, 1973 changed forever. discover a secret taping ruling is a victory for system. investigators. • Q&A Transcript: John Dean's new book "Pure Goldwater" (May 6, 2008) • Obituary: Nixon Aide DeVan L. Shumway, 77 (April 26, 2008) Wg:1 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/watergate/index.html#chapters[6/14/2009 6:06:08 PM] The Watergate Story (washingtonpost.com) • Does the News Matter To Anyone Anymore? (Jan. 20, 2008) • Why I Believe Bush Must Go (Jan. 6, 2008) Key Players | Timeline | Herblock
  • Selected Chronology of Political Protests and Events in Lawrence

    Selected Chronology of Political Protests and Events in Lawrence

    SELECTED CHRONOLOGY OF POLITICAL PROTESTS AND EVENTS IN LAWRENCE 1960-1973 By Clark H. Coan January 1, 2001 LAV1tRE ~\JCE~ ~')lJ~3lj(~ ~~JGR§~~Frlt 707 Vf~ f·1~J1()NT .STFie~:T LA1JVi~f:NCE! i(At.. lSAG GG044 INTRODUCTION Civil Rights & Black Power Movements. Lawrence, the Free State or anti-slavery capital of Kansas during Bleeding Kansas, was dubbed the "Cradle of Liberty" by Abraham Lincoln. Partly due to this reputation, a vibrant Black community developed in the town in the years following the Civil War. White Lawrencians were fairly tolerant of Black people during this period, though three Black men were lynched from the Kaw River Bridge in 1882 during an economic depression in Lawrence. When the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1894 that "separate but equal" was constitutional, racial attitudes hardened. Gradually Jim Crow segregation was instituted in the former bastion of freedom with many facilities becoming segregated around the time Black Poet Laureate Langston Hughes lived in the dty-asa child. Then in the 1920s a Ku Klux Klan rally with a burning cross was attended by 2,000 hooded participants near Centennial Park. Racial discrimination subsequently became rampant and segregation solidified. Change was in the air after World "vV ar II. The Lawrence League for the Practice of Democracy (LLPD) formed in 1945 and was in the vanguard of Post-war efforts to end racial segregation and discrimination. This was a bi-racial group composed of many KU faculty and Lawrence residents. A chapter of Congress on Racial Equality (CORE) formed in Lawrence in 1947 and on April 15 of the following year, 25 members held a sit-in at Brick's Cafe to force it to serve everyone equally.
  • CIA Intelligence Collection About Americans: CHAOS and the Office

    CIA Intelligence Collection About Americans: CHAOS and the Office

    CIA INTELLIGENCE COLLECTION ABOUT AMERICANS : CHAOS AND THE OFFICE OF SECURITY CONTENTS I. Introduction Page A. CHAOS___________________________________------------ 681 B. MERRIMAC and RESISTANCE _ _ __ _______ ___- _______ 681 C. Special security investigations _____ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ -_ _ _ _ _ _ _- __ __ _ 682 D. The investigation ____________ -- _____ -- __________________ 683 E. Summary of the issues-- _____ ________________ ___________ 683 1. Statutor authority_-_______--------------------- 684 a. CTounterintelligence-- _ _ _ _ _-_ __ __ __ _-_-_ __ __ b. Protecting sources and methods of intelligence- :E 2. Statutory prohibitions--- _-_ __ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _-__ _ _ __ 686 3. Questions raised by CHAOS----- - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 686 4. Questions raised by the Office of Security Programs-- 688 11. History and Operation of CHAOS _ - _ _-_ __ _ ___ ___ _ _ _ _ __ _-_-__ _ __ 688 A. Background----____________-_______-_______________-__ 688 B. Authorization of CHAOS _____ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ __ __ __ _ _ --_-_ _ C. The November 1967 peace movement study- ______________ % D. Operation of the CHAOS program and related CIA projects- 693 1. Gathering information ______ __ __ __ _ __ __ __ __ ____ -_- 693 2. Processing, storage and control of CHAOS informa- tion--_________________-_____-__________--~--- 695 3. Reporting by CIA- _ _ - _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __-__ _ _ _ _ _ __ ____ _ a.
  • Privacy, Wiretapping and the Citizen Congress’ Battle to Set Legal Boundaries on Government Wiretapping in the 1970S Olsen, E.A

    Privacy, Wiretapping and the Citizen Congress’ Battle to Set Legal Boundaries on Government Wiretapping in the 1970S Olsen, E.A

    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Privacy, wiretapping and the citizen Congress’ battle to set legal boundaries on government wiretapping in the 1970s Olsen, E.A. Publication date 2020 Document Version Other version License Other Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Olsen, E. A. (2020). Privacy, wiretapping and the citizen: Congress’ battle to set legal boundaries on government wiretapping in the 1970s. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:29 Sep 2021 Privacy, Wiretapping and the Citizen: Congress’ Battle to Set Legal Boundaries on Government Wiretapping in the 1970s ACADEMISCH PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Universiteit van Amsterdam op gezag van de Rector Magnificus prof. dr. ir. K.I.J.
  • A New View of the Watergate Investigations

    A New View of the Watergate Investigations

    A New View of the Watergate Investigations Author Ed Gray discusses his father�s experiences of the controversy from the top of the FBI Nixon Library April 9 at 7:00 p.m. March 18, Yorba Linda, CA—When President Nixon appointed L. Patrick Gray III as head of the FBI, Gray knew that following the footsteps of J. Edgar Hoover—his immediate (and only) predecessor—would be a challenge. But Gray quickly found himself in a deep mess, the result of the FBI’s investigation into the June 1972 break-in at the Democratic National Committee headquarters in the Watergate office complex in Washington, D.C. Gray lays out his story in his posthumously published memoirs, co-written with his son, Ed Gray. Ed Gray will discuss his father’s view of the Watergate controversy and its aftermath at a free public lecture on April 9 at 7:00 p.m. at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum. “Part of the Nixon Library’s mission is to encourage a free spirit of inquiry into all aspects of the Nixon administration, including the Watergate abuses of government power,” Library director Tim Naftali said. According to publisher Times Books: This book is Gray’s firsthand account of what really happened during his crucial year as acting director of the FBI, based on a never-before-published first-person account and previously secret documents. He reveals the witches’ brew of intrigue and perfidy that permeated Washington, and he tells the unknown story of his complex relationship with his top deputy, Mark Felt, raising disturbing questions about the methods and motives of the man purported to be Deep Throat.
  • The Vietnam War, 1965-1975

    The Vietnam War, 1965-1975

    How I will compress four lectures into one because I’ve run out of time. A last‐minute addition to my bibliography: • B.G. Burkett (Vanderbilt, 66) and Glenna Whitley, Stolen Valor: How the Vietnam Generation was robbed of its Heroes and its History (Dallas, 1998). • Burkett makes many claims in this book, but the most fascinating aspect of it is his exposure of the “phony Vietnam veteran,” a phenomenon that still amazes me. “Many Flags” campaign ‐ Allied support 1.) South Korea –largest contingent – 48,000(would lose 4407 men)‐US financial support 2.) Australia – 8000, lost 469 3.)New Zealand, 1000, lost 37 4.) Thailand – 12,000 troops, 351 lost 5.) Philippines – medical and small number of forces in pacification 6.) Nationalist China –covert operations American Force levels/casualties in Vietnam(K=killed W=wounded) 1964 23,200 K 147 W 522 1965 190,000 K 1369 W 3308 1966 390,000 5008 16,526 1967 500,000 9377 32,370 1968 535,000 14,589 46,797 1969 475,000 9414 32,940 1970 334,000 4221 15,211 1971 140,000 1381 4767 1972 50,000 300 587 Soviet and Chinese Support for North Vietnam • 1.) Despite Sino‐Soviet dispute and outbreak of Cultural Revolution in China, support continues • 2.) Soviet supply of anti‐aircraft technology and supplies to the North –along with medical supplies, arms, tanks, planes, helicopters, artillery, and other military equipment. Soviet ships provided intelligence on B‐52 raids – 3000 soldiers in North Vietnam (Soviet govt. concealed extent of support) • 3.) Chinese supply of anti‐aircraft units and engineering
  • Watergate and the Two Lives of Mark Felt

    Watergate and the Two Lives of Mark Felt

    Watergate and the Two Lives of Mark Felt Page 1 of 7 washingtonpost.com Advertisement Watergate and the Two Lives of Mark Felt Roles as FBI Official, 'Deep Throat' Clashed THE VALUE By Michael Dobbs Washington Post Staff Writer STARTS Monday, June 20, 2005; A01 WITH THE The Watergate scandal had reached a peak, and President Richard M. Nixon was furious about press leaks. His suspicions focused on the number two man at the FBI, W. Mark Felt, a 31-year bureau veteran. He ordered his aides to "confront" the presumed traitor. Another man may have panicked. Over the previous six months, Felt had been meeting secretly with Bob Woodward of The Washington Post, helping him and fellow Post reporter Carl Bernstein with a series of sensational scoops about the abuse of presidential power. But the former World War II spymaster had an exquisite sense of how to play the bureaucratic game. In a Feb. 21, 1973, FBI memo, Felt denounced the Post stories as an amalgam of "fiction and half truths," combined with some genuine information from "sources either in the FBI or the Department of Justice." To deflect attention from himself, he ordered an investigation into the latest leak. "Expedite," he instructed. Recently identified as the secret Watergate source known as "Deep Throat," Felt is the last and most mysterious of a colorful cast of characters who have captured the national imagination. Now 91, and in shaky health, the former FBI man joins a pantheon of Watergate figures ranging from H.R. "Bob" Haldeman and G. Gordon Liddy to John J.
  • FBI's Lead Watergate Investigators Speak Together Publicly

    FBI's Lead Watergate Investigators Speak Together Publicly

    FBI’s Lead Watergate Investigators Speak Together Publicly — For The First Time ! This panel will bring together publicly for the first time the FBI's lead The panel includes: investigators of the Watergate Scandal. • Angelo Lano—Agent assigned the Through memories and anecdotes, these Watergate case, considered the Bureau’s panelists will create a narrative of the most thorough source of Watergate information. To a person, every person Bureau's work that weaves the initial committed to this panel says Watergate burglary to the halls of the Nixon White would not have been successful without House and ultimately the Oval Office. Lano’s leadership. Popular culture and the media have • John Mindermann—Agent who long focused on the role of the Washington developed sources in CREEP, including Post's Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein in Judy Hoback, a key informant who breaking Watergate leads to the public. If helped shift the Bureau’s investigation the media looks at the FBI's involvement from the burglars to Nixon’s into Watergate, they often center upon administration. In 1973, he occupied former FBI Assistant Director Mark Felt, the Nixon White House to secure popularly known as "Deep Throat." This Watergate evidence under orders of the Attorney General. panel will illuminate the Bureau's role in the • Paul Magallanes—Agent who Watergate investigation and attribute the interviewed Watergate burglars in success of the Watergate investigation to a Spanish in the DC jail mere hours after handful of special agents who worked, the Watergate break-in. He developed against incredible odds and amidst sources in CREEP, including Hoback.
  • 'Lose in Vietnam, Bring Our Boys Home'

    'Lose in Vietnam, Bring Our Boys Home'

    Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons Faculty Publications 2004 ‘Lose in Vietnam, Bring Our Boys Home’ Robert N. Strassfeld Case Western Reserve University - School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/faculty_publications Part of the Law Commons Repository Citation Strassfeld, Robert N., "‘Lose in Vietnam, Bring Our Boys Home’" (2004). Faculty Publications. 267. https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/faculty_publications/267 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. "LOSE IN VIETNAM, BRING THE BOYS HOME" ROBERTN. STRASSFELD. This Article examines the contest over dissent and loyalty during the Vietnam War. The Johnson and Nixon Administrations used an array of weapons to discourage or silence antiwar opposition. These included crinLinal prosecutions for "disloyal speech," a tool that they used with less frequency than s01ne other administrations in times of war; prosecutions for other "crimes" that served as pretext for prosecuting disloyal speech; infiltration and harassment; and an attempt to characterize their critics as disloyal. The antiwar movement, in turn, responded to allegations that dissent equaled disloyalty by offering an alternative vision of loyalty and patriotism. In so doing, they recast notions of allegiance, betrayal, support of the troops, and our obligations in the face of conflicting loyalties. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... 1892 I. THE USES OF LOYALTY IN THE VIETNAM WAR ERA ........... 1894 A. The Model of Legal Repression: The World War I Experience ...........................................................................
  • Dangerous Liaisons: Seduction and Betrayal in Confidential Press-Source Relations Lili Levi University of Miami School of Law, Llevi@Law.Miami.Edu

    Dangerous Liaisons: Seduction and Betrayal in Confidential Press-Source Relations Lili Levi University of Miami School of Law, [email protected]

    University of Miami Law School University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository Articles Faculty and Deans 1991 Dangerous Liaisons: Seduction and Betrayal in Confidential Press-Source Relations Lili Levi University of Miami School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/fac_articles Part of the Communications Law Commons, and the Social Influence and Political Communication Commons Recommended Citation Lili Levi, Dangerous Liaisons: Seduction and Betrayal in Confidential Press-Source Relations, 43 Rutgers L. Rev. 609 (1991). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty and Deans at University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLE DANGEROUS LIAISONS: SEDUCTION AND BETRAYAL IN CONFIDENTIAL PRESS-SOURCE RELATIONS Lili Levi* INTRODUCTION .................................. 611 I. MEDIA ETHICS, VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURE, AND SOURCE RETALIATION .......................... 620 A. A Typology of Confidential Sources ....... 623 1. Source Identity ...................... 623 2. Motivations for Leaking ............... 624 3. Leaks versus Plants .................. 628 4. Reasons for Anonymity ............... 631 B. The Ethic of Non-Disclosure ............. .632 C. The Occasions of Voluntary Disclosure .... 636 D. The New Trend of Source Retaliation ..... 639 II. CURRENT APPROACHES TO BREACH OF CONTRACT CLAIMS BY NEWS SOURCES ..................... 644 A. Freedom of Contract Model .............. 645 B. First Amendment Model ................. 656 1. First Amendment Immunity ........... 656 * Associate Professor of Law, University of Miami School of Law. A.B. 1977, Bryn Mawr College; J.D. 1981, Harvard Law School.
  • Nixon's Wars: Secrecy, Watergate, and the CIA

    Nixon's Wars: Secrecy, Watergate, and the CIA

    Eastern Kentucky University Encompass Online Theses and Dissertations Student Scholarship January 2016 Nixon's Wars: Secrecy, Watergate, and the CIA Chris Collins Eastern Kentucky University Follow this and additional works at: https://encompass.eku.edu/etd Part of the Defense and Security Studies Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Collins, Chris, "Nixon's Wars: Secrecy, Watergate, and the CIA" (2016). Online Theses and Dissertations. 352. https://encompass.eku.edu/etd/352 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at Encompass. It has been accepted for inclusion in Online Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Encompass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Nixon’s Wars: Secrecy, Watergate, and the CIA By Christopher M. Collins Bachelor of Arts Eastern Kentucky University Richmond, Kentucky 2011 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Eastern Kentucky University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS December, 2016 Copyright © Christopher M. Collins, 2016 All rights reserved ii Acknowledgments I could not have completed this thesis without the support and generosity of many remarkable people. First, I am grateful to the entire EKU history department for creating such a wonderful environment in which to work. It has truly been a great experience. I am thankful to the members of my advisory committee, Dr. Robert Weise, Dr. Carolyn Dupont, and especially Dr. Thomas Appleton, who has been a true friend and mentor to me, and whose kind words and confidence in my work has been a tremendous source of encouragement, without which I would not have made it this far.
  • Looking at the Law

    Looking at the Law

    Looking at the Law Michelle Parrini and Charles F. Williams The recent London subway “There is always a possibility that at preventing the exercise of bombings drew renewed attention a secret police may become a First Amendment rights of to the difficulties facing government menace to free government and speech and association, on attempts to uncover and intercept ter- free institutions because it carries the theory that preventing the ror plots; though there may now be with it the possibility of abuses of growth of dangerous groups more awareness of the issue, nations power which are not always quick- and the propagation of dan- have been trying to learn their enemy’s ly apprehended or understood.” gerous ideas would protect the secrets since the beginning of recorded national security and deter vio- history. Spies appear in Homer’s Greek — The Church Committee lence…Many of the techniques epic, the Iliad. Ancient Roman writ- Report, 1976.1 used would be intolerable ings are filled with accounts of intrigue in a democratic society even and assassination plots. Caesar’s secret gence on other countries increased 39 if all of the targets had been agents looked out for his interests in percent between 1998-2002.2 Public involved in violent activity, Rome. Sun Tzu’s The Art of War (500 and congressional opinion about the but COINTELPRO went far BC) describes espionage and the use appropriate scope of covert govern- beyond that. The unexpressed of human intelligence as key to suc- ment activities, and perceptions that major premise of the programs cessful warfare.