Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 101 / Thursday, May 27, 2021 / Notices 28571

Specifically excluded from the scope are or light truck section of the Tire and Rim The products covered by this investigation the following types of tires: Association Year Book; or are currently classified under the following (1) Racing car tires; such tires do not bear (2) if the maximum cold inflation pressure Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United the symbol ‘‘DOT’’ on the sidewall and may molded on the tire is less than any cold States (HTSUS) subheadings: 4011.10.10.10, be marked with ‘‘ZR’’ in size designation; inflation pressure listed for that size 4011.10.10.20, 4011.10.10.30, 4011.10.10.40, (2) pneumatic tires, of rubber, that are not designation in either the passenger car or 4011.10.10.50, 4011.10.10.60, 4011.10.10.70, new, including recycled and retreaded tires; light truck section of the Tire and Rim 4011.10.50.00, 4011.20.10.05, and (3) non-pneumatic tires, such as solid Association Year Book, the maximum load 4011.20.50.10. Tires meeting the scope rubber tires; limit molded on the tire is higher than the description may also enter under the (4) tires designed and marketed exclusively maximum load limit listed at that cold following HTSUS subheadings: as temporary use spare tires for passenger inflation pressure for that size designation in 4011.90.10.10, 4011.90.10.50, 4011.90.20.10, vehicles which, in addition, exhibit each of either the passenger car or light truck section 4011.90.20.50, 4011.90.80.10, 4011.90.80.50, the following physical characteristics: of the Tire and Rim Association Year Book; 8708.70.45.30, 8708.70.45.46, 8708.70.45.48, (a) The size designation and load index (7) tires designed and marketed exclusively 8708.70.45.60, 8708.70.60.30, 8708.70.60.45, combination molded on the tire’s sidewall for off-road use and which, in addition, and 8708.70.60.60. While HTSUS are listed in Table PCT–1R (‘‘T’’ Type Spare exhibit each of the following physical subheadings are provided for convenience Tires for Temporary Use on Passenger characteristics: and for customs purposes, the written Vehicles) or PCT–1B (‘‘T’’ Type Diagonal (a) The size designation and load index description of the subject merchandise is (Bias) Spare Tires for Temporary Use on combination molded on the tire’s sidewall dispositive. Passenger Vehicles) of the Tire and Rim are listed in the off-the-road, agricultural, Association Year Book, industrial or ATV section of the Tire and Rim Appendix II—List of Topics Discussed (b) the designation ‘‘T’’ is molded into the Association Year Book, in the Issues and Decision tire’s sidewall as part of the size designation, (b) in addition to any size designation Memorandum and, markings, the tire incorporates a warning, (c) the tire’s speed rating is molded on the prominently molded on the sidewall, that the I. Summary sidewall, indicating the rated speed in MPH tire is ‘‘Not For Highway Service’’ or ‘‘Not for II. Background or a letter rating as listed by Tire and Rim Highway Use’’, III. Scope of the Investigation Association Year Book, and the rated speed (c) the tire’s speed rating is molded on the IV. Changes from the Preliminary is 81 MPH or a ‘‘M’’ rating; sidewall, indicating the rated speed in MPH Determination (5) tires designed and marketed exclusively or a letter rating as listed by the Tire and Rim V. Application of Facts Available and Use of as temporary use spare tires for light trucks Association Year Book, and the rated speed Adverse Inference which, in addition, exhibit each of the does not exceed 55 MPH or a ‘‘G’’ rating, and VI. Discussion of the Issues following physical characteristics: (d) the tire features a recognizable off-road Comment 1: Application of Partial Adverse (a) the tires have a 265/70R17, 255/80R17, tread design; Facts Available (AFA) to Certain 265/70R16, 245/70R17, 245/75R17, 245/ (8) Tires designed and marketed for off- Downstream Sales of Hankook 70R18, or 265/70R18 size designation; road use as all-terrain-vehicle (ATV) tires or Comment 2: Hankook’s Revised Home and (b) ‘‘Temporary Use Only’’ or ‘‘Spare’’ is utility-terrain-vehicle (UTV) tires, and which, U.S. Market Sales Data molded into the tire’s sidewall; in addition, exhibit each of the following Comment 3: Hankook’s Minor Corrections (c) the tread depth of the tire is no greater characteristics: Comment 4: Hankook’s Warranty Expenses than 6.2 mm; and (a) the tire’s speed rating is molded on the Comment 5: Application of Partial AFA to (d) Uniform Tire Quality Grade Standards sidewall, indicating the rated speed in MPH Nexen’s Sample Sales (‘‘UTQG’’) ratings are not molded into the or a letter rating as listed by the Tire and Rim Comment 6: Nexen’s CEP Offset tire’s sidewall with the exception of 265/ Association Year Book, and the rated speed Comment 7: Nexen’s Noise Reduction 70R17 and 255/80R17 which may have does not exceed 87 MPH or an ‘‘N’’ rating, Foam and Special Wrapping Costs UTQG molded on the tire sidewall; and VII. Recommendation (6) tires designed and marketed exclusively (b) both of the following physical [FR Doc. 2021–11262 Filed 5–26–21; 8:45 am] characteristics are satisfied: for specialty tire (ST) use which, in addition, BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P exhibit each of the following conditions: (i) The size designation and load index (a) The size designation molded on the combination molded on the tire’s sidewall does not match any of those listed in the tire’s sidewall is listed in the ST sections of DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE the Tire and Rim Association Year Book, passenger car or light truck sections of the Tire and Rim Association Year Book, and (b) the designation ‘‘ST’’ is molded into the International Trade Administration tire’s sidewall as part of the size designation, (ii) The size designation and load index (c) the tire incorporates a warning, combination molded on the tire’s sidewall [A–580–878] prominently molded on the sidewall, that the matches any of the following size designation tire is ‘‘For Trailer Service Only’’ or ‘‘For (American standard or metric) and load Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products Trailer Use Only’’, index combinations: From the Republic of Korea: Final (d) the load index molded on the tire’s Results of Antidumping Duty sidewall meets or exceeds those load indexes American standard size Metric size Load index Administrative Review and Final listed in the Tire and Rim Association Year Determination of No Shipments; 2018– Book for the relevant ST tire size, and 26x10R12 ...... 254/70R/12 .... 72 2019 (e) either 27x10R14 ...... 254/65R/14 .... 73 (i) the tire’s speed rating is molded on the 28x10R14 ...... 254/70R/14 .... 75 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, sidewall, indicating the rated speed in MPH 28x10R14 ...... 254/70R/14 .... 86 International Trade Administration, or a letter rating as listed by Tire and Rim 30X10R14 ..... 254/80R/14 .... 79 Department of Commerce. Association Year Book, and the rated speed 30x10R15 ...... 254/75R/15 .... 78 SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce does not exceed 81 MPH or an ‘‘M’’ rating; 30x10R14 ...... 254/80R/14 .... 90 or 31x10R14 ...... 254/85R/14 .... 81 (Commerce) determines that certain (ii) the tire’s speed rating molded on the 32x10R14 ...... 254/90R/14 .... 95 corrosion-resistant steel products sidewall is 87 MPH or an ‘‘N’’ rating, and in 32x10R15 ...... 254/85R/15 .... 83 (CORE) from the Republic of Korea either case the tire’s maximum pressure and 32x10R15 ...... 254/85R/15 .... 94 (Korea) were sold in the United States maximum load limit are molded on the 33x10R15 ...... 254/90R/15 .... 86 at less than normal value during the sidewall and either 33x10R15 ...... 254/90R/15 .... 95 (1) both exceed the maximum pressure and period of review of July 1, 2018, through 35x9.50R15 ... 241/105R/15 .. 82 June 30, 2019. maximum load limit for any tire of the same 35x10R15 ...... 254/100R/15 .. 97 size designation in either the passenger car DATES: Applicable May 27, 2021.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:29 May 26, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00047 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\27MYN1.SGM 27MYN1 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES 28572 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 101 / Thursday, May 27, 2021 / Notices

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Leo the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Rate for Non-Examined Companies Ayala, Elfi Blum, or Lingjun Wang, AD/ Act). The statute and Commerce’s CVD Operations, Office VII, Scope of the Order regulations do not address the Enforcement and Compliance, establishment of a rate to be applied to International Trade Administration, The products covered by this order companies not selected for individual U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 are CORE from Korea. For a complete examination when Commerce limits its Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, description of the scope of this order, examination in an administrative review DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3945, see the Issues and Decision pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the 6 (202) 482–0197, or (202) 482–2316, Memorandum. Act. Generally, Commerce looks to respectively. Analysis of Comments Received section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: provides instructions for calculating the All issues raised by parties in the case all-others rate in a market economy Background and rebuttal briefs are addressed in the investigation, for guidance when On November 24, 2020, Commerce Issues and Decision Memorandum. A calculating the rate for companies published the Preliminary Results of the list of the issues addressed in the Issues which were not selected for individual 2018–2019 administrative review of the and Decision Memorandum is provided examination in an administrative antidumping duty (AD) order on CORE in the appendix to this notice. The review. Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of from Korea.1 This review covers eleven Issues and Decision Memorandum is a the Act, the all-others rate is normally companies,2 of which we collapsed public document and is on file ‘‘an amount equal to the weighted Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd. and Dongbu electronically via Enforcement and average of the estimated weighted- Steel Co., Ltd. as single entity Compliance’s Antidumping and average dumping margins established (i.e., Dongbu) for AD purposes, and Countervailing Duty Centralized for exporters and producers selected Dongbu, Dongkuk, and Electronic Service System (ACCESS). individually investigated, excluding any Hyundai as mandatory respondents. ACCESS is available to registered users zero or de minimis margins, and any We invited interested parties to at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a margins determined entirely {on the comment on the Preliminary Results complete version of the Issues and basis of facts available}.’’ and received case and rebuttal briefs.3 Decision Memorandum can be accessed In this review, the final estimated On March 22, 2021, we extended the directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/ weighted-average dumping margins for time limit for the final results of this frn/. Dongbu and Dongkuk are not zero, de review from 120 days to 168 days.4 On Changes Since the Preliminary Results minimis, or based entirely on facts May 10, 2021, Commerce extended the otherwise available, and for Hyundai is deadline for the final results by an Based on the comments received, we zero. Therefore, Commerce calculated additional 10 days to May 21, 2021.5 made changes for these final results the rate for non-examined companies Commerce conducted this review in which are explained in the Issues and using a weighted average of the accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of Decision Memorandum. estimated weighted-average dumping Final Determination of No Shipments margins calculated for Dongbu and 1 See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products Dongkuk using each company’s publicly from the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results and We received no comments regarding ranged values for the subject Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty the no shipments claims with respect to merchandise.8 Administrative Review; 2018–019, 85 FR 74987 NSSVC, HSG, and TDA since the (November 24, 2020) (Preliminary Results), and Preliminary Results. Further, we have Final Results of the Administrative accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Review 2 The eleven companies are: Dongbu Steel Co., analyzed the questionnaire responses Ltd., Dongbu Incheon Steel Co., Ltd., Dongkuk Steel submitted by the respondents since the We determine that the following Mill Co., Ltd. (Dongkuk), Company Preliminary Results and determined that weighted-average dumping margins (Hyundai), POSCO Ltd., POSCO Daewoo the record contains no information that Corporation, POSCO International Corporation, exist for the period July 1, 2018, through POSCO Coated & Color Steel Co., Hoa Sen Group calls into question a finding of no June 30, 2019: (HSG), Ton Dong A Corporation (TDA), and Nippon shipments.7 Therefore, we find that Steel and Sumikin Sales Vietnam Co. (NSSVC). NSSVC, HSG, and TDA had no 8 Commerce normally calculates (A) a weighted- 3 See Petitioners’ Letters: ‘‘Corrosion-Resistant shipments of subject merchandise average of the estimated weighted-average dumping Steel Products from the Republic of Korea: during the POR. margins calculated for the examined respondents; Petitioners’ Case Brief Regarding Dongbu Steel Co., (B) a simple average of the estimated weighted- Ltd.,’’ dated January 11, 2021; ‘‘Corrosion-Resistant average dumping margins calculated for the Steel Products from the Republic of Korea: 6 See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Corrosion-Resistant examined respondents; and (C) a weighted-average Petitioners’ Case Brief Regarding Dongkuk Steel Steel Products from the Republic of Korea: Issues of the estimated weighted-average dumping margins Mill Co., Ltd.,’’ dated January 11, 2021; ‘‘Corrosion- and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of calculated for the examined respondents using each Resistant Steel Products from : Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and company’s publicly ranged U.S. sale values of the Petitioners’ Rebuttal Brief Regarding Dongkuk Steel Final Determination of No Shipments; 2018–2019,’’ subject merchandise. Commerce then selects from Mill Co., Ltd.,’’ dated January 19, 2021; Dongkuk’s dated with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (B) and (C) the rate closest to (A) as the most Letters, ‘‘Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products (Issues and Decision Memorandum). appropriate rate for non-examined companies. See from the Republic of Korea: Case Brief,’’ dated 7 See NSSVC’s Letter, ‘‘Corrosion-Resistant Steel Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from France, January 11, 2021; and ‘‘Certain Corrosion-Resistant Products from the Republic of Korea: NSSVC’s Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom: Steel Products from the Republic of Korea: Rebuttal Response to the Department’s Administrative Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Brief,’’ dated January 19, 2021. Review Questionnaire,’’ dated November 24, 2020; Reviews, Final Results of Changed-Circumstances 4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Corrosion-Resistant TDA’s Letters, ‘‘Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Review, and Revocation of an Order in Part, 75 FR Steel Products from the Republic of Korea: Products from the Korea, 7/1/2018–6/30/2018 53661, 53663 (September 1, 2010). Extension of Deadline for Final Results of Administrative Review, Case No. A–580–878: Initial 9 Commerce finds that that KG Dongbu Steel Co., Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated Questionnaire Response,’’ dated November 23, Ltd. is the successor-in-interest to Dongbu Steel Co., March 22, 2021. 2020, and ‘‘Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Ltd. and Dongbu Incheon Steel Co., Ltd. for 5 See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Corrosion-Resistant Products from the Republic of Korea, Case No. A– purposes of determining AD cash deposits and Steel Products from the Republic of Korea: Second 580–878: No Shipment letter,’’ dated October 9, liabilities. See Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Extension of Deadline for Final Results of 2019; and HSG’s Letter, ‘‘Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products and Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated Products from the People’s Republic of China- Products from the Republic of Korea: Final Results May 10, 2021. Response to Questionnaire,’’ dated March 11, 2020. of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Changed

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:29 May 26, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00048 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\27MYN1.SGM 27MYN1 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 101 / Thursday, May 27, 2021 / Notices 28573

Weighted-average Producer or exporter dumping margin (percent)

Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd./Dongbu Incheon Steel Co., Ltd.9 ...... 0.86 Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd ...... 0.76 Hyundai Steel Company ...... 0.00

Review-Specific Average Rate Applicable to the Following Companies: 10

POSCO, POSCO Daewoo Corporation and POSCO International Corporation ...... 0.80 POSCO Coated & Color Steel Co., Ltd ...... 0.80

Disclosure expired (i.e., within 90 days of prior to liquidation of the relevant publication). entries during the POR. Failure to We intend to disclose the calculations comply with this requirement could Cash Deposit Requirements performed in connection with these result in Commerce’s presumption that final results to parties in this proceeding The following cash deposit reimbursement of antidumping duties within five days after public requirements will be effective upon occurred and the subsequent assessment announcement of the final results, in publication of the notice of final results of doubled antidumping duties. accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). of administrative review for all Administrative Protective Order Assessment Rates shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, This notice also serves as a reminder Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the for consumption on or after the date of to parties subject to administrative Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), publication, as provided by section protective orders (APO) of their Commerce will determine, and U.S. 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit responsibility concerning the return or Customs and Border Protections (CBP) rate for the respondents noted above destruction of proprietary information shall assess, antidumping duties on all will be the rate established in the final disclosed under APO in accordance appropriate entries of subject results of this administrative review; (2) with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely merchandise in accordance with the for merchandise exported by written notification of the return or final results of this review. We will manufacturers or exporters not covered destruction of APO materials, or calculate importer-specific assessment in this administrative review but conversion to judicial protective order, rates on the basis of the ratio of the total covered in a prior segment of the is hereby requested. Failure to comply amount of antidumping duties proceeding, the cash deposit rate will with the regulations and the terms of an calculated for each importer’s examined continue to be the company-specific rate APO is a sanctionable violation. sales and the total entered value of the published for the most recently sales in accordance with 19 CFR completed segment of this proceeding; Notification to Interested Parties 351.212(b)(1). (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered We are issuing and publishing this in this review, a prior review, or the For entries of subject merchandise notice in accordance with sections original investigation, but the producer during the POR produced by each 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 is, then the cash deposit rate will be the respondent for which it did not know its CFR 351.221(b)(5). rate established for the most recently merchandise was destined for the completed segment of this proceeding Dated: May 21, 2021. United States, we will instruct CBP to for the producer of the subject Christian Marsh, liquidate such entries at the all-others merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement rate if there is no rate for the rate for all other producers or exporters and Compliance. intermediate company(ies) involved in will continue to be 8.31 percent, the all- Appendix the transaction. others cash deposit rate established in Consistent with its recent notice,11 the investigation.12 These cash deposit List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum Commerce intends to issue assessment requirements, when imposed, shall instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 remain in effect until further notice. I. Summary days after the date of publication of the II. Background final results of this review in the Notification to Importers Regarding the III. Scope of the Order Federal Register. If a timely summons is Reimbursement of Duties IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results V. Final Determination of No Shipments filed at the U.S. Court of International This notice also serves as a final VI. Discussion of Comments Trade, the assessment instructions will reminder to importers of their Comment 1: Home Market Packing direct CBP not to liquidate relevant responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) Expenses entries until the time for parties to file to file a certificate regarding the Comment 2: Clad Material/Coating Metal a request for a statutory injunction has reimbursement of antidumping duties (CMETALH/U) Coding

Circumstances Reviews, 86 FR 10922 (February 23, Circumstances Reviews, 86 FR 10922 (February 23, the Republic of Korea and Taiwan: Amended Final 2021). 2021). Affirmative Antidumping Determination for India 10 See supra n.8. 10 See supra n.8. and Taiwan, and Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 9 Commerce finds that that KG Dongbu Steel Co., 11 See Notice of Discontinuation of Policy to Issue 48390 (July 25, 2016), as amended by Certain Ltd. is the successor-in-interest to Dongbu Steel Co., Liquidation Instructions After 15 Days in Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the Ltd. and Dongbu Incheon Steel Co., Ltd. for Applicable Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Republic of Korea: Notice of Court Decision Not in purposes of determining AD cash deposits and Harmony with Final Determination of Investigation liabilities. See Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Administrative Proceedings, 86 FR 3995 (January Products and Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel 15, 2021). and Notice of Amended Final Results, 83 FR 39054 Products from the Republic of Korea: Final Results 12 See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products (August 8, 2018). of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Changed from India, Italy, the People’s Republic of China,

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:29 May 26, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00049 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\27MYN1.SGM 27MYN1 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES 28574 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 101 / Thursday, May 27, 2021 / Notices

Comment 3: Changes to Calculations Action Coalition (the petitioner) filed its Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Comment 4: General & Administrative case brief.3 Centralized Electronic Service System (G&A) Expenses On January 8, 2021, we received a (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to Comment 5: Constructed Export Price joint rebuttal brief from the respondents registered users at https:// (CEP) Offset and a rebuttal brief from the petitioner.4 Comment 6: Cost of Production-Smoothing access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete VII. Recommendation On February 26, 2021, Commerce version of the Issues and Decision rejected the respondents’ case brief and Memorandum can be accessed directly [FR Doc. 2021–11247 Filed 5–26–21; 8:45 am] the petitioner’s rebuttal brief for at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/ BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P containing untimely new factual index.html. information.5 On March 2, 2021, the Changes Since the Preliminary Results DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE respondents’ submitted a revised case brief, and the petitioner submitted its Based on our analysis of the International Trade Administration revised rebuttal case brief.6 comments received, and for the reasons On March 3, 2021, Commerce explained in the Issues and Decision [A–489–829] extended the deadline for these final Memorandum, we made certain changes results until May 21, 2021.7 from the Preliminary Results. Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From the Republic of Turkey: Final Results Scope of the Order 8 Final Determination of No Shipments of Antidumping Duty Administrative The scope of the Order covers rebar For the Preliminary Results, we found Review and Final Determination of No from Turkey. A full description of the that Habas Sinai ve Tibbi Gazlar Istihsal Shipments; 2018–2019 scope of the Order is contained in the Endu¨ strisi A.S (Habas) did not have any Issues and Decision Memorandum.9 shipments of subject merchandise AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, during the POR. No parties commented International Trade Administration, Analysis of Comments Received on this preliminary determination. For Department of Commerce. All issues raised in the case and the final results of review, we continue SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce rebuttal briefs filed by parties in this to find that Habas made no shipments (Commerce) finds that sales of steel review are addressed in the Issues and of subject merchandise during the POR. concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) from the Decision Memorandum. A list of the Final Results of Administrative Review Republic of Turkey (Turkey) were made issues addressed in the Issues and at less than normal value during the Decision Memorandum is in the For these final results, we determine period of review (POR) July 1, 2018, appendix to this notice. The Issues and that the following weighted-average through June 30, 2019. Decision Memorandum is a public dumping margins exist for the period DATES: Applicable May 27, 2021. document and is on file electronically July 1, 2018, through June 30, 2019: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT via Enforcement and Compliance’s : Weighted- Robert Copyak or Thomas Dunne, AD/ average CVD Operations, Office VII, 3 See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Steel Concrete Producers/exporters dumping Enforcement and Compliance, Reinforcing Bar from the Republic of Turkey: margin RTAC’s Case Brief,’’ dated December 22, 2020. (percent) International Trade Administration, 4 See Respondents’ Letter, ‘‘Steel Concrete U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Reinforcing Bar from the Republic of Turkey: Icdas Celik Enerji Tersane ve Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, Turkish Respondents’ Rebuttal Case Brief,’’ dated Ulasim Sanayi A.S 10 ...... 5.30 DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3642 or January 8, 2021; see also Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Steel Kaptan Demir Celik Endu¨strisi ve Concrete Reinforcing Bars from the Republic of (202) 482–2328, respectively. Turkey: RTAC’s Rebuttal Brief,’’ dated January 8, Ticaret A.S ...... 12.41 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 2021. Review-Specific Average Rate 5 See Commerce Letters, ‘‘Steel Concrete Applicable to the Following Background Reinforcing Bar from the Republic of Turkey— Companies: 11 Rejection of Case Brief Containing Untimely New Colakoglu Dis Ticaret A.S ... 7.05 On November 24, 2020, Commerce Factual Information,’’ dated February 26, 2021 and Colakoglu Metalurji A.S ...... 7.05 published the Preliminary Results of ‘‘Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from the Republic Diler Dis Ticaret A.S ...... 7.05 this administrative review and invited of Turkey—Rejection of Rebuttal Brief Containing Kaptan Metal Dis Ticaret ve interested parties to comment on the Untimely New Factual Information,’’ dated Nakliyat A.S ...... 7.05 1 February 26, 2021. Preliminary Results. These final results 6 See Respondents’ Letter, ‘‘Steel Concrete cover seven companies for which an Reinforcing Bar from the Republic of Turkey: Rates for Non-Selected Companies administrative review was initiated and Submission of Turkish Respondents’ Revised Case For the rate for non-selected not rescinded. On December 22, 2020, Brief,’’ dated March 2, 2021; see also Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from respondents in an administrative Kaptan Demir Celik Endustrisi ve Turkey: Resubmission of RTAC’s Rebuttal Brief,’’ Ticaret A.S. (Kaptan Demir) and Icdas dated March 2, 2021. 10 We have determined that the two company Celik Enerji Tersane ve Ulasim Sanayi 7 See Memorandum, ‘‘Administrative Review of names (Icdas Celik Enerji Tersane ve Ulasim and A.S. (Icdas) (collectively, the the Antidumping Duty Order on Steel Concrete Icdas) refer to the same company, and the rate respondents) filed a joint case brief.2 Reinforcing Bar from the Republic of Turkey,’’ calculated for Icdas applies to both company dated March 3, 2021. names. See Preliminary Results and accompanying Also, on the same day, the Rebar Trade 8 See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from the Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 2. Republic of Turkey and Japan: Amended Final 11 This rate is based on the rates for the 1 See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from the Affirmative Antidumping Duty Determination for respondents that were selected for individual Republic of Turkey: Preliminary Results of the Republic of Turkey and Antidumping Duty review, excluding rates that are zero, de minimis, Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Orders, 82 FR 32532 (July 14, 2017) (Order). or based entirely on facts available. See section Preliminary Determination of No-Shipments; 2018– 9 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act; see also Memorandum, 2019, 85 FR 74983 (November 24, 2020) Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2018– ‘‘Final Results of the Antidumping Administrative (Preliminary Results). 2019 Administrative Review of the Antidumping Review of Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from the 2 See Respondents’ Letter, ‘‘Steel Concrete Duty Order on Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Republic of Turkey; 2018–2019: Calculation of the Reinforcing Bar from the Republic of Turkey: Turkey,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby Cash Deposit Rate for Non-Selected Companies,’’ Turkish Respondents’ Case Brief,’’ dated December adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision dated concurrently with these final results (Non- 22, 2020. Memorandum). Selected Companies Memorandum).

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:29 May 26, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00050 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\27MYN1.SGM 27MYN1 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES