Informal Reasoning with and Without the Internet: an Individual Differences Approach

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Informal Reasoning with and Without the Internet: an Individual Differences Approach INFORMAL REASONING WITH AND WITHOUT THE INTERNET: AN INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES APPROACH A Dissertation Presented to The Academic Faculty By Victor J. Ellingsen In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in Psychology Georgia Institute of Technology May, 2017 Copyright © 2017 by Victor J. Ellingsen Informal Reasoning With and Without the Internet: An Individual Differences Approach Approved by: Dr. Phillip L. Ackerman, Advisor Dr. Rick P. Thomas School of Psychology School of Psychology Georgia Institute of Technology Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Margaret E. Beier Dr. Paul Verhaeghen Department of Psychology School of Psychology Rice University Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. James S. Roberts School of Psychology Date Approved: March 29, 2017 Georgia Institute of Technology ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Phillip Ackerman, for his guidance on this project and over the course of my graduate school career. I also appreciate the advice provided by the other committee members during this project. I also would like to thank the many people whose support was perhaps less tangible, but just as important. Erin Marie Conklin, Samuel Posnock, and Charles Calderwood provided invaluable insight into how to follow in their footsteps. Elnora Kelly, Laura Barg-Walkow, Sadaf Kazi, Chelsea Vance, Mike Morrison, and Ilya Gokhman were with me to celebrate the highs and commiserate on the lows that are inevitably part of graduate school. Franklin Rea, Kyle Jones, and my exceptionally patient mother were always willing to listen despite not always knowing what I was talking about or why it seemed important. The many friends I met through Georgia Tech Hapkido and Black Knight Martial Arts were a wonderful and much-needed community outside of the lab. In particular, Dr. Brian Ritchie and Dr. Matthieu Bloch generously offered their views of grad school from the “other side,” which helped me keep things in perspective. I am also indebted to the 2017 federal hiring freeze, which left me with nothing to do for three months except to sit in New Hampshire and finish this dissertation. Finally, this project would not have been possible without assistance from Chelsea Vance, Andrew Helbling, Soundarya Kanthimathinathan, and Sadaf Kazi, who helped code the more than 10,000 arguments generated by participants in these two studies. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................... iii LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................. vi SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... viii CHAPTER 1 ....................................................................................................................... 1 Measurement Approaches ............................................................................................... 5 Prompt types ................................................................................................................ 5 Tasks ............................................................................................................................ 8 Instructions .................................................................................................................... 15 Interim Summary and Theoretical Framework ............................................................. 16 Individual Differences in Informal Reasoning .............................................................. 19 Within-person consistency of informal reasoning performance ................................ 19 Cognitive ability ........................................................................................................ 20 Prior knowledge ......................................................................................................... 23 Prior opinion .............................................................................................................. 26 Non-ability factors ..................................................................................................... 28 Program of Research ..................................................................................................... 30 Study 1 ....................................................................................................................... 30 Study 2 ....................................................................................................................... 31 Interim Summary and Overview of Method ................................................................. 41 CHAPTER 2 ..................................................................................................................... 42 Method .......................................................................................................................... 42 Power analysis ........................................................................................................... 42 Sample ....................................................................................................................... 43 Measures .................................................................................................................... 44 Procedure ................................................................................................................... 49 Results ........................................................................................................................... 49 Assessments of abilities and non-ability factors ........................................................ 51 Argument generation task .......................................................................................... 51 Predictors of reasoning performance ......................................................................... 58 Discussion ..................................................................................................................... 67 CHAPTER 3 ..................................................................................................................... 73 Method .......................................................................................................................... 73 iv Power analysis ........................................................................................................... 74 Sample ....................................................................................................................... 74 Measures .................................................................................................................... 74 Procedure ................................................................................................................... 81 Results ........................................................................................................................... 82 Predictor variables ..................................................................................................... 83 Argument generation task .......................................................................................... 88 Missing data and adjusted analysis plan .................................................................... 89 Experimental manipulation results (Hypotheses 2 through 4) .................................. 91 Individual differences results (Hypotheses 5 through 8) ........................................... 96 Exploratory Analyses .............................................................................................. 101 Discussion ................................................................................................................... 112 CHAPTER 4 ................................................................................................................... 124 Predictors of Reasoning Performance ......................................................................... 124 Methodological Considerations................................................................................... 126 Limitations .................................................................................................................. 127 Conclusion ................................................................................................................... 128 APPENDIX A ................................................................................................................. 132 APPENDIX B ................................................................................................................. 133 APPENDIX C ................................................................................................................. 134 APPENDIX D ................................................................................................................. 135 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................... 139 v LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Argument Prompts ............................................................................................. 47 Table 2: Descriptive Statistics for Person-Level Predictors (Study 1) ............................. 52 Table 3: Correlations Between Person-level Predictors (Study 1) .................................. 52 Table 4: Descriptive Statistics for Reasoning Items (Study 1) ........................................ 54 Table 5: Myside
Recommended publications
  • Democratic Strain and Popular Discontent in Europe: Responding to the Challenges Facing Liberal Democracies
    DEMOCRATIC STRAIN AND POPULAR DISCONTENT IN EUROPE: RESPONDING TO THE CHALLENGES FACING LIBERAL DEMOCRACIES Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development Michael Levitt, Chair JUNE 2019 42nd PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION Published under the authority of the Speaker of the House of Commons SPEAKER’S PERMISSION The proceedings of the House of Commons and its Committees are hereby made available to provide greater public access. The parliamentary privilege of the House of Commons to control the publication and broadcast of the proceedings of the House of Commons and its Committees is nonetheless reserved. All copyrights therein are also reserved. Reproduction of the proceedings of the House of Commons and its Committees, in whole or in part and in any medium, is hereby permitted provided that the reproduction is accurate and is not presented as official. This permission does not extend to reproduction, distribution or use for commercial purpose of financial gain. Reproduction or use outside this permission or without authorization may be treated as copyright infringement in accordance with the Copyright Act. Authorization may be obtained on written application to the Office of the Speaker of the House of Commons. Reproduction in accordance with this permission does not constitute publication under the authority of the House of Commons. The absolute privilege that applies to the proceedings of the House of Commons does not extend to these permitted reproductions. Where a reproduction includes briefs to a Standing Committee of the House of Commons, authorization for reproduction may be required from the authors in accordance with the Copyright Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Online Dialogue and Interaction Disruption. a Latin American Government’S Use of Twitter Affordances to Dissolve Online Criticism
    Online Dialogue and Interaction Disruption. A Latin American Government’s Use of Twitter Affordances to Dissolve Online Criticism Dialogo en línea e interacciones interrumpidas. El uso que un gobierno Latinoamericano hace de las posibilidades tecnológicas de Twitter para disolver críticas en línea Carlos Davalos University of Wisconsin-Madison Orcid http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6846-1661 [email protected] Abstract: Few academic studies have focused on how Latin American governments operate online. Political communica- tion studies focused on social media interactions have overwhelmingly dedicated efforts to understand how regular citizens interact and behave online. Through the analysis of hashtags and other online strategies that were used during Mexican Pres- ident Enrique Peña Nieto’s (EPN) term to critique or manifest unconformity regarding part of the government’s performance, this study observes how members of a Latin American democratic regime weaponized a social media platform to dissipate criticism. More specifically, it proposes that the manipulation of social media affordances can debilitate essential democratic attributes like freedom of expression. Using a qualitative approach, consisting of observation, textual analysis, and online eth- nography, findings show that some Mexican government’s manipulation of inconvenient Twitter conversations could impact or even disrupt potential offline crises. Another objective of the presented research is to set a baseline for future efforts focused on how Latin American democratic regimes behave and generate digital communication on social media platforms. Keywords: Mexico, citizens, government, social media, disruption, social capital, affordances, weaponization, Twitter, online, criticisms Resumen: Son pocos los proyectos académicos dirigidos a entender la forma en que gobiernos Latinoamericanos operan en línea/Internet.
    [Show full text]
  • I ANKARA UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE of SOCIAL SCIENCES
    ANKARA UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES FACULTY OF COMMUNICATIONS COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF IMPROVING NEWS TRUSTWORTHINESS IN KENYA AND TURKEY IN THE WAKE OF FAKE NEWS IN DIGITAL ERA. MASTER’S THESIS ABDINOOR ADEN MAALIM SUPERVISOR DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ ERGİN ŞAFAK DİKMEN ANKARA- 2021 i TEZ ONAY SAYFASI TÜRKİYE CUMHURİYETİ ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ (MEDYA VE İLETİŞİM ÇALIŞMALARI ANABİLİM DALI) Dijital Çağdaki Sahte Haberlerin Sonucunda Türkiye ve Kenya’da Artan Haber Güvenilirliğinin Karşılaştırmalı Analizi (YÜKSEK LİSANS TEZİ) Tez Danışmanı DR. ÖĞR. Üyesi ERGİN ŞAFAK DİKMEN TEZ JÜRİSİ ÜYELERİ Adı ve Soyadı İmzası 1- PROF.DR. ABDULREZAK ALTUN 2- DR. ÖĞR. Üyesi ERGİN ŞAFAK DİKMEN 3- Doç. Dr. FATMA BİLGE NARİN. Tez Savunması Tarihi 17-06-2021 ii T.C. ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Müdürlüğü’ne, DR. ÖĞR. Üyesi ERGİN ŞAFAK DİKMEN danışmanlığında hazırladığım “Dijital Çağdaki Sahte Haberlerin Sonucunda Türkiye ve Kenya’da Artan Haber Güvenilirliğinin Karşılaştırmalı Analizi (Ankara.2021) ” adlı yüksek lisans - doktora/bütünleşik doktora tezimdeki bütün bilgilerin akademik kurallara ve etik davranış ilkelerine uygun olarak toplanıp sunulduğunu, başka kaynaklardan aldığım bilgileri metinde ve kaynakçada eksiksiz olarak gösterdiğimi, çalışma sürecinde bilimsel araştırma ve etik kurallarına uygun olarak davrandığımı ve aksinin ortaya çıkması durumunda her türlü yasal sonucu kabul edeceğimi beyan ederim. Tarih: 3/8/2021 Adı-Soyadı ve İmza ABDINOOR ADEN MAALIM iii ANKARA UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES FACULTY OF COMMUNICATIONS COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF IMPROVING NEWS TRUSTWORTHINESS IN KENYA AND TURKEY IN THE WAKE OF FAKE NEWS IN DIGITAL ERA. MASTER’S THESIS ABDINOOR ADEN MAALIM SUPERVISOR DR. ÖĞR. ÜYESİ ERGİN ŞAFAK DİKMEN ANKARA- 2021 iv DECLARATION I hereby declare with honour that this Master’s thesis is my original work and has been written by myself in accordance with the academic rules and ethical requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • 7 Mar 2018 Submission: Fake News
    Written Representation 144 Name: Nicholas Fang Managing Director, Black Dot Pte Ltd Received: 7 Mar 2018 Submission: Fake News - A National Security Concern and What Needs To Be Done to Address It 1. Introduction 2. The Critical Dangers 3. Possible Solutions 4. Conclusion 1. Introduction There have been numerous efforts from governments, academia and industry around the world to address the challenges and threats posed by the phenomenon that has come to be known as fake news, but with little in the way of conclusive and definitive solutions or answers. This submission aims to raise ideas and suggestions from the perspective of journalism and the communications sector, to address some of the unique circumstances and challenges facing Singapore and Singaporeans in this era of fake news. Information is a powerful tool that is essential to the effective functioning of a democratic society. It permeates all aspects of society and leaves its mark on tangible and intangible aspects, including public policy, financial markets, societal perceptions, attitudes, mores, values and behaviour of individuals. Information can be used positively to educate, influence and persuade, or for more nefarious purposes. As a long-time journalist , first with The Straits Times for nine years and then six years at Mediacorp as a senior editor overseeing teams of reporters and other editors, the power of information as conveyed through different media platforms was deeply ingrained in me and indeed all of us practitioners of the trade from the first day on the job. Accuracy was paramount, and context and background essential to ensure the value of the information was fully understood.
    [Show full text]
  • GOOGLE IS a MAFIA-LIKE POLITICAL CARTEL 1.2.Pdf
    INVESTIGATIONS REVEAL THAT GOOGLE IS OPERATED AS A MAFIA-LIKE CARTEL FBI 302 Form Background Information Draft FED-DOJCONG44-2018.C-GH 1.2 Investigation of Google/Alphabet/YouTube/Jigsaw, et al, Operating As An Organized Crime Entity President Donald Trump 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20500 U.S. Christopher Wray – Director Federal Bureau Of Investigation 601 4th Street NW Washington, DC 20535 Jeff Sessions – Attorney General U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530-0001 Erin Schneider - Senior Investigator, Regional Director - Enforcement Securities And Exchange Commission 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2800 San Francisco, CA 94104 Copies To: Tamara (Tien-Jan) Jih Murray, Google Litigation Counsel Google, Inc. 15 Upper Lake Road Woodside, CA 94062 David Drummond, Google Litigation Counsel Google, Inc. #2 Quail Road Woodside, CA 94062 Kent Walker, Google Litigation Counsel Google LLC 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway Mountain View, CA 94043 1 INVESTIGATIONS REVEAL THAT GOOGLE IS OPERATED AS A MAFIA-LIKE CARTEL FBI 302 Form Background Information Google And It's Cartel Members have offices in the United States nationwide and are, at least, known to have offices in California at numerous locations. Google And It's Cartel Members attempted (And did, in fact, succeed) to “kill brands via Jigsaw AI attacks; decimate income via anti-trust violations; bribe politicians to acquire exclusive monopolistic advantages over competitors; steal technology; manipulate the stock market via “flash-boy”, “pump-and-dump”,
    [Show full text]
  • Cybergossip Or Securities Fraud? Some First Amendment Guidance in Drawing the Line
    University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository Faculty Publications Faculty Scholarship 2001 Cybergossip or Securities Fraud? Some First Amendment Guidance in Drawing the Line. Lyrissa Lidsky University of Missouri School of Law, [email protected] Michael Pike Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/facpubs Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, First Amendment Commons, Internet Law Commons, and the Privacy Law Commons Recommended Citation Lidsky, Lyrissa Barnett, Cybergossip or Securities Fraud? Some First Amendment Guidance in Drawing the Line, 5 No. 5 Wallstreetlawyer.com: Sec. Elect. Age 15. (2001). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CYBERGOSSIP OR SECURITIES FRAUD? SOME FIRST..., 5 No. 5... 5 No. 5 Wallstreetlawyer.com: Sec. Elec. Age 15 Wallstreetlawyer.com: Securities in the Electronic Age October, 2001 CYBERGOSSIP OR SECURITIES FRAUD? SOME FIRST AMENDMENT GUIDANCE IN DRAWING THE LINE Lyrissa Barnett Lidsky, Michael Pike a1 Copyright (c) 2001 Glasser LegalWorks; Lyrissa Barnett Lidsky, Michael Pike Fifteen-year-old Jonathan Lebed, the youngest person ever pursued by the SEC in an enforcement action, made over $800,000 in six months by promoting stocks on Internet message boards. Using several fictitious screen names, Jonathan posted hundreds of messages on Yahoo! Finance, hyping selected over-the-counter stocks and then promptly selling his pre-purchased shares as soon as the stock prices rose.
    [Show full text]
  • Networks of Outrage and Hope- Social Movements in the Internet
    networks of outrage and hope Pour Alain Touraine My intellectual father, theorist of social movements networks of outrage and hope social movements in the internet age Second Edition manuel castells polity Copyright © Manuel Castells 2012, 2015 The right of Manuel Castells to be identified as Author of this Work has been asserted in accordance with the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published in 2012 by Polity Press This edition first published in 2015 by Polity Press Polity Press 65 Bridge Street Cambridge CB2 1UR, UK Polity Press 350 Main Street Malden, MA 02148, USA All rights reserved. Except for the quotation of short passages for the purpose of criticism and review, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. ISBN-13: 978-0-7456-9575-4 ISBN-13: 978-0-7456-9576-1(pb) A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Castells, Manuel, 1942– Networks of outrage and hope : social movements in the Internet age / Manuel Castells. pages cm Revised edition of the author’s Networks of outrage and hope published in 2012. ISBN 978-0-7456-9575-4 (hardback) -- ISBN 978-0-7456-9576-1 (pbk.) 1. Information technology--Social aspects. 2. Internet--Social aspects. 3. Information society. 4. Information networks. 5. Social movements. 6. Technology and civilization. I. Title. HM851.C369 2015 302.23’1--dc23 2014043395 Typeset in 10.75 on 14 pt Janson Text by Servis Filmsetting Ltd, Stockport, Cheshire SK2 5AJ Printed and bound in the United States by Courier Digital Solutions, North Chelmsford, MA The publisher has used its best endeavours to ensure that the URLs for external websites referred to in this book are correct and active at the time of going to press.
    [Show full text]
  • To Disinformation!
    NO to Disinformation! How to Recognize Historical Manipulation and Historical Fake News on the Internet Author: Łukasz Kamiński No to Disinformation! 1 Ministry of Culture Ministry of Culture Table of contents NO 1. Introduction 4 to Disinformation! 2. How to recognize disinformation? 8 How to Recognize Historical Manipulation 2.1 Who is the author? 9 and Historical Fake News on the Internet 2.2 Take a look at the information 11 Author: 2.3 Check the photo or video 13 Łukasz Kamiński 2.4 Quotes, documents 15 Warsaw, 2021 3. How to verify information (virtual world) 16 3.1 Encyclopedias and biographical dictionaries 17 3.2 Digital libraries and archives 20 3.3 Publication databases 22 3.4 Press 24 3.5 History websites 25 3.6 Institutions 27 4. How to verify information (physical world) 28 4.1 Just ask 28 4.2 Visit a library 30 4.3 Contact an archive 31 5. Good practices 32 6. Key terms 33 7. Useful websites and online publications 35 Soviet activity in this field was met with resistance from 1. Introduction the West, especially the United States •. One of the most famous disinformation operations was the joint Stasi-KGB action to spread the belief that the AIDS virus has been artificially created by Americans• . The inclination to gossip and believe rumours has been plaguing humanity since the dawn of time. This facet of our Caricature published in the newspaper psychology is connected both to natural curiosity and to Pravda in October 1986. According to the will to strengthen a person’s social status by possessing the Russians, the some widely unknown, confidential and important virus was created in the Pentagon’s ‘information’ •.
    [Show full text]
  • Leiden University Law School
    Special Rapporteur on the Promotion and Protection of the Right to Freedom of Opinion and Expression A Report by Students at Leiden Law School Written by Niamh Coghlan, Amalia Flenga, Carola Gioco, Lindsay McCosh, Flavia Mencarini, Guilherme Migliora, Melanie Moulder, Ona Lorda Roure, Uditi Saha, Agnese Soverini, and Ruoxin Su with Dr Mark Leiser, Leiden Law School Purpose: To inform the Special Rapporteur’s annual thematic report presented to the Human Rights Council at its 47th session in June 2021 Report on Disinformation 1 Leiden Law School Executive summary: 1. This report identifies the main challenges posed by disinformation. It analyses the impact of measures adopted by States as well as platforms to combat this phenomenon. Based on the findings of our research, the report provides a series of recommendations to the Special Rapporteur. 2. Disinformation has consequences for both individuals and society. Identified issues include population control, loss of consumer protection, as well as increasing democratic deficits and discriminatory practices. 3. States have deployed various strategies to counterbalance the negative effects of disinformation. Some have used ‘command-and-criminality' methods to punish those spreading disinformation. Often these come with disproportionate penalties. Others have launched official programmes that include platforms monitoring or using independent organizations to debunk misleading online news and information. If abused, however, these measures can encroach basic human rights like freedom of expression, the right to liberty and security, etc.. These measures can also hamper the work of journalists and the public’s right to access information. 4. The report highlights both legal provisions and guidance at the international and regional levels addressing human rights abuses arising from far-reaching and over broad measures countering disinformation.
    [Show full text]
  • Senior Citizen Issue Look Inside for FUN for SENIORS
    February 24 – March 9, 2021 Senior Citizen Issue Look inside for FUN FOR SENIORS YOUR REGIONAL BI-WEEKLY COMMUNITY NEWSPAPER 607-844-8228 CORTLAND • ITHACA • DRYDEN • HOMER • GROTON • MARATHON • WHITNEY POINT • MORAVIA • TULLY • LAFAYETTE [email protected] Est. 2002 @TCATRIBUNE CORTLANDAREATRIBUNE.COM The VIEW SPORTS BAR and RESTAURANT | 4568 OCTAGON ROAD | TULLY, NY 13159 ALWAYS accepting new patients (with a referral) 10 James Street Homer, New York 13077 Open Monday-Friday The View 8am-4:30pm Premier Golf Course-Restaurant-Sports Bar & Event Center 607-749-2640 Fax: 607-749-2644 Dr. Eduardo Bonilla-Trejos Dr. Jianghong Yu • Dr. Sheetal Rayancha The Best View Do you have Medicare and Medicaid? in Town! Are you new to Medicare? Theviewatsunsetpines.com Weddings-Company Parties-Special Events-Banquets Are you turning 65? Accomodates up to 200 people - Outside Deck - Full Bar Available Outdoor Ceremony location - Private Bridal Suite - In-House Catering TV’s for Slide Show Presentations - Rehearsal Dinners - AC/Heat HHAWKINSPHOTOGRAPHY Book your event now! Call 315-810-4180 Contact your local HOME of SUNSET PINES EXECUTIVE 9 HOLE GOLF COURSE - TOP QUALITY RESTAURANT - SPORTS BAR with LARGE SCREEN TV’S Good Food-Good Company-Good Games-Good Times Broker today for Seasonal Club Ride Destination Point-Amazing Food FREE help! Multiple rooms to rent inside & out MEDICARE Family Friendly-Pig Roasts Worth the Trip from Anywhere! INSURANCE 2021 Golf Leagues forming now! HOURS: Contact: Eric Vincent (607) 591-9649 Closed Monday Tuesday-Friday...4 to close [email protected] Saturday-Sunday...12 to close Masks and Social Distancing Rules Apply COVID-19 Sampling Center Help us stop the spread.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter V Traffickers Use of the Internet
    CHAPTER V TRAFFICKERS USE OF THE INTERNET TRAFFICKERS USE OF THE INTERNET V CHAPTER 5 TRAFFICKERS USE OF THE INTERNET; DIGITAL HUNTING FIELDS339 As the world continues to transform digitally, internet technologies are increasingly being used for the facil- The following pages make use of a definition of itation of trafficking in persons. With the rise of new Internet Technologies or Internet Usage to describe technologies, some traffickers have adapted their modus technology elements in the reviewed court cases. operandi for cyberspace by integrating technology and The term broadly refers to technologies in form of taking advantage of digital platforms to advertise, recruit social media platforms and applications, webpag- and exploit victims. es, communication apps or other applications de- Everyday digital platforms are used by traffickers to ad- signed to transfer money, pictures or text between vertise deceptive job offers and to market exploitative ser- individuals. The more precise term of Information vices to potential paying customers. Victims are recruited and Communications Technologies (ICT) is not through social media, with traffickers taking advantage used since it refers to all communication including of publicly available personal information and the an- telecommunications, which would be overly broad onymity of online spaces to contact victims. Patterns of for this research. exploitation have been transformed by digital platforms, as webcams and livestreams have created new forms of exploitation and reduced the need for transportation and The following chapter presents an analysis of the collect- transfer of victims. ed court cases, illustrating how internet technologies are With the help of the internet, traffickers have learnt to applied by traffickers to perpetrate their crimes in the adapt their strategies to effectively target specific victims, digital age.
    [Show full text]
  • Informational Social Influence
    Informational Social Influence TOWSON UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF GRADUATE STUDIES INFORMATIONAL SOCIAL INFLUENCE AND THE INTERNET: MANIPULATION IN A CONSUMPTIVE SOCIETY by Christopher P. Golda A thesis Presented to the faculty of Towson University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts Department of Psychology Towson University Towson, Maryland 21252 (December, 2014) Informational Social Influence ii Informational Social Influence Acknowledgements A special thanks to my family and committee for all their support and assistance. iii Informational Social Influence Abstract Information Social Influence and the Internet: Manipulation in a Consumptive Society Christopher P. Golda Research on Informational Social Influence (ISI) has demonstrated that an individual’s opinion can be shaped by others. Subsequent research has shown that an individual’s sensory perceptions can be influenced in the same manner, with significant implications for consumer advertising. The present study extends the current body of literature on ISI by applying this premise to artwork evaluated over the Internet. In this study, 60 participants were randomly assigned to one of four groups wherein they were asked to evaluate a piece of artwork over the Internet while unsuspectingly utilizing confederate ratings that were manipulated by opinion and credibility. The results demonstrated that confederate ratings influenced a participant’s evaluation of artwork; however, confederate expertise and the interaction were not significant. Ultimately,
    [Show full text]